Railroads Stocks
Railroads: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. owns the largest revenue base; L.B. Foster Company has the fastest current growth.
How has Railroads moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 14% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 10% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of S&P 500 on a rolling three-month view for 4 weeks running.
RS ↑4w · 9/10 >200d (+1) · 4/10 lead (+2) · EPS 6/10↑
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 10 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Is Railroads outperforming S&P 500?
Railroads has outperformed S&P 500 by 11.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 2%. 7 of 10 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. L.B. Foster Company is the strongest against the sector itself at +13.4%.
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Railroads has outperformed S&P 500 by 11.7% over 52 weeks and 2% over 13 weeks. 7 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 10 beat the sector itself. The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. leads with revenue of $2,631 million, based on 3 of 10 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1CSX CorporationCSX | 62.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 21.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.6 pp 45% evidence | 16.1/25 ROCE 3.7% · OPM 36% 76% evidence | 9.2/20 P/E 27.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.6/20 RS sector 8.3% · RS bench 14.1% · 1Y 44%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.9 + 16.1 + 9.2 + 15.6 = 62.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 2Union Pacific CorporationUNP | 60.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.2 pp 45% evidence | 17.2/25 ROCE 4.3% · OPM 39.5% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 22× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.3/20 RS sector 2% · RS bench 7.7% · 1Y 33.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 17.2 + 10.2 + 14.3 = 60.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies CorporationWAB | 58.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 19.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 45% evidence | 13.7/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 17.5% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 36.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.5/20 RS sector 8.7% · RS bench 14.5% · 1Y 56.2%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.1 + 13.7 + 8.5 + 17.5 = 58.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Canadian National Railway CompanyCNI | 56.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 15.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.2 pp 45% evidence | 14.2/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 35.4% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 21.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.3/20 RS sector 2.8% · RS bench 8.6% · 1Y 37.5%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.9 + 14.2 + 10.5 + 16.3 = 56.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5L.B. Foster CompanyFSTR | 53.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 22.3/35 Revenue 11.7% · PAT -73% · OPM change 3.7 pp 62% evidence | 4.5/25 ROCE 0.8% · OPM 1.7% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 27.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 13.4% · RS bench 19.4% · 1Y 89.6%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.3 + 4.5 + 9.5 + 17 = 53.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Trinity Industries, Inc.TRN | 47.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 22.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.5 pp 45% evidence | 11.7/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 20.5% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 8.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.0/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench -6.1% · 1Y 17.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.5 + 11.7 + 11.5 + 2 = 47.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7Norfolk Southern CorporationNSC | 45.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 13.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -9 pp 45% evidence | 12.8/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 29.3% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 26.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.7/20 RS sector -3.5% · RS bench 2.1% · 1Y 21.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.7 + 12.8 + 9.8 + 8.7 = 45 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Canadian Pacific Kansas City LimitedCP | 44.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 45% evidence | 11.4/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 34% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 28.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -3.7% · RS bench 1.8% · 1Y 20.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 11.4 + 8.8 + 6.6 = 44.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.GBX | 30.5/100Adverse evidence79% evidence | BASING | 3.7/35 Revenue -25.6% · PAT -54.2% · OPM change -5.5 pp 95% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 5.5% 76% evidence | 15.8/20 P/E 14× · PEG 0.27 65% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -12.2% · RS bench -7.2% · 1Y 11.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 3.7 + 7 + 15.8 + 4 = 30.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 10FreightCar America, Inc.RAIL | 24.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 7.5/35 Revenue -4.9% · PAT — · OPM change -4.9 pp 62% evidence | 3.0/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM -0.9% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -22.7% · RS bench -18.2% · 1Y -5.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.5 + 3 + 11.2 + 3 = 24.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Market action
L.B. Foster Company has the strongest one-year price move in Railroads at +89.6%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +19.4%. 7 of 10 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Railroads itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. has the highest Revenue among the 10 Railroads companies compared here, at $2,631 million. L.B. Foster Company is next at $563 million. L.B. Foster Company has the highest Revenue growth at 11.7%, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. is the scale leader at $2,631 million, 367.3% ahead of L.B. Foster Company. L.B. Foster Company's growth is 11.7% from a $563 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
Investor read: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. is the scale benchmark; L.B. Foster Company is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.'s growth falls below L.B. Foster Company's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Pacific Corporation UNP | $6.2B | 3.2% | Jun 2026 |
| Canadian National Railway Company CNI | $4.4B | -0.6% | Jun 2026 |
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited CP | $3.7B | -2.5% | Jun 2026 |
| CSX Corporation CSX | $3.5B | 1.7% | Jun 2026 |
| Norfolk Southern Corporation NSC | $3.0B | 0.2% | Jun 2026 |
| Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation WAB | $3.0B | 13% | Jun 2026 |
| The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. GBX | $577M | -32% | Jun 2026 |
| Trinity Industries, Inc. TRN | $492M | -16% | Jun 2026 |
| L.B. Foster Company FSTR | $121M | 23% | Mar 2026 |
| FreightCar America, Inc. RAIL | $64M | -33% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP
CSX Corporation · CSX
FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL
L.B. Foster Company · FSTR
Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX
Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN
Union Pacific Corporation · UNP
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Canadian National Railway Company · CNI
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP
CSX Corporation · CSX
FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL
L.B. Foster Company · FSTR
Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX
Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN
Union Pacific Corporation · UNP
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
Union Pacific Corporation has the highest OPM among the 10 Railroads companies compared here, at 39.5%. CSX Corporation is next at 36%. CSX Corporation has the highest Margin change at +5.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 10 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Union Pacific Corporation leads opm at 39.5%; CSX Corporation leads margin change at +5.6 percentage points.
Investor read: Union Pacific Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Pacific Corporation UNP | 40% | +0.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| CSX Corporation CSX | 36% | +5.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Canadian National Railway Company CNI | 35% | −1.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited CP | 34% | −0.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Norfolk Southern Corporation NSC | 29% | −9.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Trinity Industries, Inc. TRN | 21% | +3.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation WAB | 18% | −0.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. GBX | 5.5% | −5.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| L.B. Foster Company FSTR | 1.7% | +3.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| FreightCar America, Inc. RAIL | -0.9% | −4.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Canadian National Railway Company · CNI
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP
CSX Corporation · CSX
FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL
L.B. Foster Company · FSTR
Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX
Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN
Union Pacific Corporation · UNP
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB
Margin change · reported quarter history
Canadian National Railway Company · CNI
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP
CSX Corporation · CSX
FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL
L.B. Foster Company · FSTR
Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX
Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN
Union Pacific Corporation · UNP
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB
Profit Scale & Acceleration
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 10 Railroads companies compared here, at $109 million. FreightCar America, Inc. is next at $30 million. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at -54.2%. 3 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. leads with $109 million of TTM profit, 263.3% above FreightCar America, Inc.. The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. shows -54.2% growth from a $109 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
Investor read: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Pacific Corporation UNP | $1.7B | 4.6% | Jun 2026 |
| Canadian National Railway Company CNI | $1.1B | -1.3% | Jun 2026 |
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited CP | $845M | -7.0% | Jun 2026 |
| CSX Corporation CSX | $807M | 25% | Jun 2026 |
| Norfolk Southern Corporation NSC | $547M | -27% | Jun 2026 |
| Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation WAB | $363M | 11% | Jun 2026 |
| FreightCar America, Inc. RAIL | $42M | -16% | Mar 2026 |
| Trinity Industries, Inc. TRN | $27M | -6.9% | Jun 2026 |
| The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. GBX | $18M | -74% | Jun 2026 |
| L.B. Foster Company FSTR | $1M | -89% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Canadian National Railway Company · CNI
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP
CSX Corporation · CSX
FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL
L.B. Foster Company · FSTR
Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX
Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN
Union Pacific Corporation · UNP
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Canadian National Railway Company · CNI
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP
CSX Corporation · CSX
FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL
L.B. Foster Company · FSTR
Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX
Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN
Union Pacific Corporation · UNP
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB
Return On Capital Employed
Union Pacific Corporation has the highest ROCE among the 10 Railroads companies compared here, at 4.3%. CSX Corporation is next at 3.7%. L.B. Foster Company has the highest ROCE change at +1.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 10 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Union Pacific Corporation leads ROCE at 4.3%, 0.6 percentage points above CSX Corporation. L.B. Foster Company has the strongest latest improvement at +1.5 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
Investor read: Union Pacific Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union Pacific Corporation UNP | 4.3% | +0.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| CSX Corporation CSX | 3.7% | +0.5 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation WAB | 3.5% | +0.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Canadian National Railway Company CNI | 3.2% | 0.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Norfolk Southern Corporation NSC | 2.7% | −0.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Trinity Industries, Inc. TRN | 2.5% | +1.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited CP | 1.8% | +0.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. GBX | 0.9% | −2.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| L.B. Foster Company FSTR | 0.8% | +1.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| FreightCar America, Inc. RAIL | -0.3% | −3.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Canadian National Railway Company · CNI
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP
CSX Corporation · CSX
FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL
L.B. Foster Company · FSTR
Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX
Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN
Union Pacific Corporation · UNP
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Canadian National Railway Company · CNI
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP
CSX Corporation · CSX
FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL
L.B. Foster Company · FSTR
Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX
Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN
Union Pacific Corporation · UNP
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 10 Railroads companies compared here, at 0.27×. Trinity Industries, Inc. has the lowest P/E at 8.31×, so level and change sit with different companies. 1 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.27×. Only 1 of 10 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation WAB | 3.3 | 36.2 | Jun 2026 |
| Canadian National Railway Company CNI | 2.9 | 21.8 | Jun 2026 |
| Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited CP | 2.8 | 28.6 | Jun 2026 |
| Trinity Industries, Inc. TRN | 2.4 | 8.3 | Jun 2026 |
| Norfolk Southern Corporation NSC | 2.2 | 26.8 | Jun 2026 |
| Union Pacific Corporation UNP | 2.1 | 22.0 | Jun 2026 |
| CSX Corporation CSX | 1.5 | 27.5 | Jun 2026 |
| The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. GBX | 0.3 | 14.0 | Jun 2026 |
| L.B. Foster Company FSTR | — | 27.1 | Mar 2026 |
| FreightCar America, Inc. RAIL | — | 10.8 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Canadian National Railway Company · CNI
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP
CSX Corporation · CSX
Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX
Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN
Union Pacific Corporation · UNP
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB
P/E · reported quarter history
Canadian National Railway Company · CNI
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP
CSX Corporation · CSX
FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL
L.B. Foster Company · FSTR
Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX
Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN
Union Pacific Corporation · UNP
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Railroads comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 10 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 10 Railroads companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
Railroads company comparison FAQs
These 22 answers restate the Railroads comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 10 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Railroads sector outperforming S&P 500?
Railroads has outperformed S&P 500 by 11.7% over 52 weeks and 2% over 13 weeks. 7 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 10 beat the sector itself.
Which Railroads company is largest by revenue?
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. leads with revenue of $2,631 million, based on 3 of 10 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which Railroads company is growing fastest?
L.B. Foster Company has the fastest current revenue growth at 11.7%, across 3 of 10 comparable companies.
Which Railroads company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
CSX Corporation ranks first at 62.8/100 with 57.8% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Railroads company has the lowest comparable PEG?
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.27, among 1 of 10 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Railroads comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Railroads company is the biggest?
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $2,631 million, ahead of L.B. Foster Company at $563 million. That covers 3 of 10 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which Railroads company has the best profit margins?
Union Pacific Corporation has the highest operating margin at 39.5%, from 10 of 10 comparable companies. CSX Corporation shows the biggest recent improvement, at +5.6 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Railroads company makes the most profit?
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. earns the most, at $109 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 3 of 10 comparable companies. The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at -54.2%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Railroads company earns the highest return on capital?
Union Pacific Corporation leads on return on capital employed at 4.3%, across 10 of 10 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Railroads stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.27×. Only 1 of 10 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Railroads sector beating the market?
Railroads has outperformed S&P 500 by 11.7% over the last 52 weeks and 2% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 7 of 10 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Railroads stock has the strongest price momentum?
L.B. Foster Company has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Railroads company scores highest for research priority?
CSX Corporation scores 62.8 out of 100 with 57.8% evidence confidence, from 21.9 points on growth and earnings, 16.1 on capital efficiency, 9.2 on valuation and 15.6 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Railroads companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 10 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Railroads sector?
The 10 Railroads companies on this page carry $557,501 million of combined market value. Union Pacific Corporation is the largest at $176,054 million, about 32% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.
What is the Railroads sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 10 Railroads companies on this page is 26.8×, measured on the 10 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.
How is the Railroads sector performing?
7 of the 10 covered Railroads companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 11.7% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.
How many Railroads stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 10 listed Railroads companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.