Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-04
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Railroads Stocks

Railroads: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. owns the largest revenue base; L.B. Foster Company has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Railroads moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 14% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 10% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of S&P 500 on a rolling three-month view for 4 weeks running.

TURNING · ahead 4w~Moving with the index4 of 10 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS ↑4w · 9/10 >200d (+1) · 4/10 lead (+2) · EPS 6/10↑

20030020262025202420232022 308348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100115Mar 22Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 7 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 8 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 106, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 8 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 108, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 8 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 106, against 100 at the start · up 6.2% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 113, against 100 at the start · up 7.0% on a year ago · 8 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 107, against 100 at the start · up 2.2% on a year ago · 8 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 106, against 100 at the start · up 13.3% on a year ago · 8 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 104, against 100 at the start · up 5.4% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · up 2.7% on a year ago · 8 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 115, against 100 at the start · up 15.9% on a year ago · 8 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · up 26.7% on a year ago · 8 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 105, against 100 at the start · up 7.0% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 112, against 100 at the start · up 17.5% on a year ago · 8 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · up 8.1% on a year ago · 8 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 114, against 100 at the start · up 8.1% on a year ago · 8 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 115, against 100 at the start · up 6.4% on a year ago · 8 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two115 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
20030020262025202420232022 308348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100115Mar 22Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 7 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 8 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 106, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 8 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 108, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 8 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 106, against 100 at the start · up 6.2% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 113, against 100 at the start · up 7.0% on a year ago · 8 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 107, against 100 at the start · up 2.2% on a year ago · 8 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 106, against 100 at the start · up 13.3% on a year ago · 8 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 104, against 100 at the start · up 5.4% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · up 2.7% on a year ago · 8 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 115, against 100 at the start · up 15.9% on a year ago · 8 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 102, against 100 at the start · up 26.7% on a year ago · 8 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 105, against 100 at the start · up 7.0% on a year ago · 8 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 112, against 100 at the start · up 17.5% on a year ago · 8 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 110, against 100 at the start · up 8.1% on a year ago · 8 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 114, against 100 at the start · up 8.1% on a year ago · 8 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 115, against 100 at the start · up 6.4% on a year ago · 8 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two115No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Railroads, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 10 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Railroads outperforming S&P 500?

Railroads has outperformed S&P 500 by 11.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 2%. 7 of 10 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. L.B. Foster Company is the strongest against the sector itself at +13.4%.

+2.0%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+11.7%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
7/10Stocks leading S&P 500
5/10Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Railroads has outperformed S&P 500 by 11.7% over 52 weeks and 2% over 13 weeks. 7 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 10 beat the sector itself. The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. leads with revenue of $2,631 million, based on 3 of 10 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Companies
10
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$557.5B
Union Pacific Corporation
Revenue growing
1/3
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
7/10
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 3 of 10
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
CSX Corporation has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 57.8% evidence confidence.
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. looks inexpensive relative to peers or its own history, but its earnings trajectory has not yet earned the valuation signal.
Canadian National Railway Company has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1CSX CorporationCSX 62.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 21.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 5.6 pp 45% evidence 16.1/25 ROCE 3.7% · OPM 36% 76% evidence 9.2/20 P/E 27.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.6/20 RS sector 8.3% · RS bench 14.1% · 1Y 44%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.9 + 16.1 + 9.2 + 15.6 = 62.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
2Union Pacific CorporationUNP 60.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.2 pp 45% evidence 17.2/25 ROCE 4.3% · OPM 39.5% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 22× · PEG — 15% evidence 14.3/20 RS sector 2% · RS bench 7.7% · 1Y 33.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.9 + 17.2 + 10.2 + 14.3 = 60.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies CorporationWAB 58.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 19.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 45% evidence 13.7/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 17.5% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 36.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.5/20 RS sector 8.7% · RS bench 14.5% · 1Y 56.2%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.1 + 13.7 + 8.5 + 17.5 = 58.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Canadian National Railway CompanyCNI 56.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence BREAKING OUT 15.9/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.2 pp 45% evidence 14.2/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 35.4% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 21.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.3/20 RS sector 2.8% · RS bench 8.6% · 1Y 37.5%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.9 + 14.2 + 10.5 + 16.3 = 56.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5L.B. Foster CompanyFSTR 53.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence FADING 22.3/35 Revenue 11.7% · PAT -73% · OPM change 3.7 pp 62% evidence 4.5/25 ROCE 0.8% · OPM 1.7% 76% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 27.1× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.0/20 RS sector 13.4% · RS bench 19.4% · 1Y 89.6%11 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 22.3 + 4.5 + 9.5 + 17 = 53.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Trinity Industries, Inc.TRN 47.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 22.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3.5 pp 45% evidence 11.7/25 ROCE 2.5% · OPM 20.5% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 8.3× · PEG — 15% evidence 2.0/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench -6.1% · 1Y 17.9%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.5 + 11.7 + 11.5 + 2 = 47.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Norfolk Southern CorporationNSC 45.0/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 13.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -9 pp 45% evidence 12.8/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM 29.3% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 26.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.7/20 RS sector -3.5% · RS bench 2.1% · 1Y 21.9%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 13.7 + 12.8 + 9.8 + 8.7 = 45 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Canadian Pacific Kansas City LimitedCP 44.1/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 45% evidence 11.4/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 34% 76% evidence 8.8/20 P/E 28.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -3.7% · RS bench 1.8% · 1Y 20.8%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.3 + 11.4 + 8.8 + 6.6 = 44.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.GBX 30.5/100Adverse evidence79% evidence BASING 3.7/35 Revenue -25.6% · PAT -54.2% · OPM change -5.5 pp 95% evidence 7.0/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 5.5% 76% evidence 15.8/20 P/E 14× · PEG 0.27 65% evidence 4.0/20 RS sector -12.2% · RS bench -7.2% · 1Y 11.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 3.7 + 7 + 15.8 + 4 = 30.5 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
10FreightCar America, Inc.RAIL 24.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 7.5/35 Revenue -4.9% · PAT — · OPM change -4.9 pp 62% evidence 3.0/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM -0.9% 76% evidence 11.2/20 P/E 10.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -22.7% · RS bench -18.2% · 1Y -5.1%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 7.5 + 3 + 11.2 + 3 = 24.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
04 · what price has already done

Market action

L.B. Foster Company has the strongest one-year price move in Railroads at +89.6%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +19.4%. 7 of 10 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. has the highest Revenue among the 10 Railroads companies compared here, at $2,631 million. L.B. Foster Company is next at $563 million. L.B. Foster Company has the highest Revenue growth at 11.7%, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. is the scale leader at $2,631 million, 367.3% ahead of L.B. Foster Company. L.B. Foster Company's growth is 11.7% from a $563 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderThe Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · $2,631 million
Gap367.3% versus #2 · L.B. Foster Company
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/10 companies · 191 observations

Investor read: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. is the scale benchmark; L.B. Foster Company is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.'s growth falls below L.B. Foster Company's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenue growthfastest growers
Revenue · company comparison
3/10 level · 3/10 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Union Pacific Corporation UNP$6.2B3.2%Jun 2026
Canadian National Railway Company CNI$4.4B-0.6%Jun 2026
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited CP$3.7B-2.5%Jun 2026
CSX Corporation CSX$3.5B1.7%Jun 2026
Norfolk Southern Corporation NSC$3.0B0.2%Jun 2026
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation WAB$3.0B13%Jun 2026
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. GBX$577M-32%Jun 2026
Trinity Industries, Inc. TRN$492M-16%Jun 2026
L.B. Foster Company FSTR$121M23%Mar 2026
FreightCar America, Inc. RAIL$64M-33%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Canadian National Railway Company · CNI

$3.6B
$3.8B
$3.7B
$4.3B
$4.5B
$4.5B
$4.3B
$4.1B
$4.0B
$4.5B
$4.2B
$4.3B
$4.1B
$4.4B
$4.4B
$4.3B
$4.2B
$4.5B
$4.4B

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP

$1.9B
$2.0B
$1.8B
$2.2B
$2.3B
$2.5B
$2.3B
$3.2B
$3.3B
$3.8B
$3.5B
$3.6B
$3.5B
$3.9B
$3.8B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.9B
$3.7B

CSX Corporation · CSX

$3.3B
$3.4B
$3.4B
$3.8B
$3.9B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.6B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.6B
$3.5B
$3.4B
$3.6B
$3.6B
$3.5B
$3.5B

FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL

$58M
$75M
$93M
$57M
$86M
$129M
$81M
$89M
$62M
$127M
$161M
$147M
$113M
$138M
$96M
$119M
$161M
$126M
$64M

L.B. Foster Company · FSTR

$130M
$113M
$99M
$132M
$130M
$137M
$115M
$148M
$145M
$135M
$124M
$141M
$137M
$128M
$98M
$144M
$138M
$160M
$121M

Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC

$2.9B
$2.9B
$2.9B
$3.3B
$3.3B
$3.2B
$3.1B
$3.0B
$3.0B
$3.1B
$3.0B
$3.0B
$3.1B
$3.0B
$3.0B
$3.1B
$3.1B
$3.0B
$3.0B

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX

$599M
$551M
$683M
$794M
$951M
$767M
$1.1B
$1.0B
$1.0B
$809M
$863M
$820M
$1.1B
$876M
$762M
$843M
$760M
$706M
$588M
$577M

Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN

$420M
$472M
$473M
$417M
$497M
$591M
$642M
$722M
$821M
$798M
$810M
$841M
$799M
$629M
$585M
$506M
$454M
$611M
$492M

Union Pacific Corporation · UNP

$5.6B
$5.7B
$5.9B
$6.3B
$6.6B
$6.2B
$6.1B
$6.0B
$5.9B
$6.2B
$6.0B
$6.0B
$6.1B
$6.1B
$6.0B
$6.2B
$6.2B
$6.1B
$6.2B

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB

$1.9B
$2.1B
$1.9B
$2.0B
$2.1B
$2.3B
$2.2B
$2.4B
$2.6B
$2.5B
$2.5B
$2.6B
$2.7B
$2.6B
$2.6B
$2.7B
$2.9B
$3.0B
$3.0B

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Canadian National Railway Company · CNI

21%
26%
21%
16%
-6.6%
-12%
-1.6%
-1.5%
6.7%
3.1%
-2.5%
3.6%
-1.3%
1.3%
2.4%
-0.6%

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP

7.2%
19%
21%
23%
44%
44%
53%
55%
14%
6.3%
2.6%
7.8%
2.7%
3.2%
1.3%
-2.5%

CSX Corporation · CSX

28%
18%
8.8%
8.6%
-3.0%
-8.3%
-1.3%
-0.7%
0.1%
1.3%
-3.8%
-7.0%
-3.4%
-0.9%
-0.9%
1.7%

FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL

54%
48%
72%
-13%
56%
-28%
-1.6%
99%
65%
82%
8.7%
-40%
-19%
42%
-8.7%
-33%

L.B. Foster Company · FSTR

-15%
0.0%
21%
16%
12%
12%
-1.5%
7.8%
-4.7%
-5.5%
-5.2%
-21%
2.1%
0.7%
25%
23%

Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC

16%
17%
14%
7.4%
-8.3%
-11%
-5.1%
-4.1%
2.2%
2.7%
-1.6%
-0.4%
2.2%
1.7%
-1.7%
0.2%

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX

59%
39%
64%
31%
6.9%
5.5%
-23%
-21%
3.5%
8.3%
-12%
2.8%
-28%
-19%
-23%
-32%

Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN

42%
18%
25%
36%
73%
65%
35%
26%
16%
-2.7%
-21%
-28%
-40%
-43%
-2.9%
-16%

Union Pacific Corporation · UNP

14%
18%
7.8%
3.3%
-4.9%
-9.5%
-0.3%
-0.4%
0.7%
2.5%
-0.6%
-0.1%
2.5%
2.5%
-0.6%
3.2%

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB

1.8%
9.1%
11%
14%
18%
23%
9.5%
14%
9.9%
4.4%
2.3%
4.5%
2.3%
8.4%
15%
13%
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Union Pacific Corporation has the highest OPM among the 10 Railroads companies compared here, at 39.5%. CSX Corporation is next at 36%. CSX Corporation has the highest Margin change at +5.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 10 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Union Pacific Corporation leads opm at 39.5%; CSX Corporation leads margin change at +5.6 percentage points.

LeaderUnion Pacific Corporation · 39.5%
Gap9.7% versus #2 · CSX Corporation
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage10/10 companies · 191 observations

Investor read: Union Pacific Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Operating margin · company comparison
10/10 level · 10/10 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Union Pacific Corporation UNP40%+0.2 ppJun 2026
CSX Corporation CSX36%+5.6 ppJun 2026
Canadian National Railway Company CNI35%−1.2 ppJun 2026
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited CP34%−0.7 ppJun 2026
Norfolk Southern Corporation NSC29%−9.0 ppJun 2026
Trinity Industries, Inc. TRN21%+3.5 ppJun 2026
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation WAB18%−0.7 ppJun 2026
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. GBX5.5%−5.5 ppJun 2026
L.B. Foster Company FSTR1.7%+3.7 ppMar 2026
FreightCar America, Inc. RAIL-0.9%−4.9 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Canadian National Railway Company · CNI

37%
42%
33%
41%
43%
42%
39%
39%
38%
41%
36%
36%
37%
37%
37%
38%
39%
39%
35%

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP

40%
41%
29%
39%
41%
40%
37%
30%
35%
38%
33%
35%
34%
40%
35%
36%
37%
41%
34%

CSX Corporation · CSX

44%
40%
38%
45%
41%
37%
40%
40%
36%
34%
36%
39%
37%
31%
30%
36%
30%
32%
36%

FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL

-7.1%
0.1%
-0.7%
4.5%
-12%
-4.8%
1.4%
8.7%
2.3%
0.2%
2.4%
8.9%
7.6%
8.5%
4.0%
6.5%
9.1%
6.2%
-0.9%

L.B. Foster Company · FSTR

0.6%
-0.5%
-2.3%
1.9%
-0.9%
-4.6%
0.5%
4.5%
1.1%
0.2%
4.5%
3.2%
5.3%
2.4%
-2.0%
5.3%
6.0%
4.9%
1.7%

Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC

40%
40%
37%
39%
38%
37%
23%
19%
25%
26%
7.1%
37%
52%
37%
38%
38%
35%
32%
29%

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX

7.2%
2.1%
3.7%
2.5%
6.5%
-0.6%
6.0%
4.9%
6.2%
8.0%
7.4%
8.8%
12%
13%
11%
11%
9.5%
8.7%
4.3%
5.5%

Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN

19%
15%
12%
18%
19%
19%
11%
14%
12%
19%
14%
17%
15%
18%
17%
19%
26%
55%
21%

Union Pacific Corporation · UNP

44%
43%
41%
40%
40%
39%
38%
37%
37%
39%
39%
40%
40%
41%
39%
41%
41%
40%
40%

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB

11%
13%
12%
13%
13%
11%
13%
13%
15%
12%
17%
16%
16%
13%
18%
17%
17%
12%
18%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Canadian National Railway Company · CNI

+2.3 pp
+5.5 pp
+0.4 pp
+5.4 pp
−1.3 pp
−4.8 pp
−1.4 pp
−2.1 pp
−3.4 pp
−1.1 pp
−3.3 pp
+0.2 pp
+2.3 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.4 pp
−1.2 pp

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP

−0.5 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.6 pp
+7.5 pp
−9.7 pp
−5.4 pp
−2.0 pp
−4.0 pp
+5.5 pp
−1.2 pp
+2.1 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.1 pp
+2.6 pp
+0.8 pp
−0.7 pp

CSX Corporation · CSX

−12.0 pp
−3.1 pp
−2.6 pp
+1.9 pp
−5.0 pp
−4.9 pp
−3.1 pp
−3.2 pp
−0.5 pp
+1.8 pp
−2.9 pp
−5.9 pp
−3.2 pp
−7.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+5.6 pp

FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL

+15.7 pp
−5.3 pp
−4.9 pp
+2.1 pp
+4.2 pp
+14.7 pp
+5.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.2 pp
+5.3 pp
+8.3 pp
+1.6 pp
−2.4 pp
+1.5 pp
−2.3 pp
−4.9 pp

L.B. Foster Company · FSTR

−1.3 pp
−1.5 pp
−4.1 pp
+2.8 pp
+2.6 pp
+2.0 pp
+4.8 pp
+4.0 pp
−1.3 pp
+4.2 pp
+2.2 pp
−6.5 pp
+2.1 pp
+0.7 pp
+2.5 pp
+3.7 pp

Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC

−2.6 pp
−1.8 pp
−3.1 pp
−14.5 pp
−19.8 pp
−12.6 pp
−10.2 pp
−15.6 pp
+17.9 pp
+26.9 pp
+11.1 pp
+31.2 pp
+0.6 pp
−16.9 pp
−5.9 pp
−9.0 pp

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX

−0.7 pp
−2.7 pp
+2.3 pp
+2.4 pp
−0.3 pp
+8.6 pp
+1.4 pp
+3.9 pp
+5.6 pp
+4.8 pp
+3.6 pp
+2.2 pp
−2.3 pp
−4.1 pp
−6.7 pp
−5.5 pp

Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN

−2.2 pp
0.0 pp
+4.5 pp
−0.8 pp
−3.8 pp
−6.5 pp
−0.6 pp
+3.4 pp
+3.2 pp
+3.1 pp
−0.8 pp
+2.8 pp
+1.9 pp
+10.8 pp
+37.1 pp
+3.5 pp

Union Pacific Corporation · UNP

−5.1 pp
−3.6 pp
−3.6 pp
−2.7 pp
−2.8 pp
−3.5 pp
+0.1 pp
+1.4 pp
+3.0 pp
+3.1 pp
+2.2 pp
0.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.1 pp
−1.8 pp
+0.2 pp

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB

+2.8 pp
+1.1 pp
−2.0 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.1 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.5 pp
+3.9 pp
+3.3 pp
+1.8 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.7 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 10 Railroads companies compared here, at $109 million. FreightCar America, Inc. is next at $30 million. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at -54.2%. 3 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. leads with $109 million of TTM profit, 263.3% above FreightCar America, Inc.. The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. shows -54.2% growth from a $109 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderThe Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · $109 million
Gap263.3% versus #2 · FreightCar America, Inc.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/10 companies · 191 observations

Investor read: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Profit growthfastest growers
Net profit · company comparison
3/10 level · 1/10 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Union Pacific Corporation UNP$1.7B4.6%Jun 2026
Canadian National Railway Company CNI$1.1B-1.3%Jun 2026
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited CP$845M-7.0%Jun 2026
CSX Corporation CSX$807M25%Jun 2026
Norfolk Southern Corporation NSC$547M-27%Jun 2026
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation WAB$363M11%Jun 2026
FreightCar America, Inc. RAIL$42M-16%Mar 2026
Trinity Industries, Inc. TRN$27M-6.9%Jun 2026
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. GBX$18M-74%Jun 2026
L.B. Foster Company FSTR$1M-89%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Canadian National Railway Company · CNI

$1.7B
$1.2B
$918M
$1.3B
$1.5B
$1.4B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$2.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$1.1B

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP

$472M
$532M
$590M
$765M
$891M
$1.3B
$800M
$1.3B
$780M
$1.0B
$774M
$903M
$837M
$1.2B
$909M
$1.2B
$917M
$1.1B
$845M

CSX Corporation · CSX

$968M
$934M
$859M
$1.2B
$1.1B
$966M
$987M
$984M
$828M
$839M
$880M
$963M
$894M
$733M
$646M
$829M
$694M
$720M
$807M

FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL

$1M
$1M
$-26M
$15M
$-18M
$-10M
$-5M
$-19M
$3M
$-3M
$-12M
$8M
$-107M
$35M
$50M
$12M
$-7M
$-17M
$42M

L.B. Foster Company · FSTR

$2M
$0M
$-2M
$2M
$-2M
$-44M
$-2M
$3M
$0M
$0M
$4M
$3M
$36M
$0M
$-2M
$3M
$4M
$2M
$1M

Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC

$753M
$760M
$703M
$819M
$958M
$790M
$466M
$356M
$478M
$527M
$53M
$737M
$1.1B
$733M
$750M
$768M
$711M
$644M
$547M

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX

$36M
$6M
$11M
$8M
$29M
$-17M
$37M
$27M
$29M
$33M
$34M
$41M
$65M
$59M
$46M
$68M
$40M
$37M
$14M
$18M

Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN

$26M
$22M
$10M
$17M
$30M
$43M
$17M
$24M
$26M
$73M
$32M
$58M
$41M
$41M
$29M
$22M
$37M
$197M
$27M

Union Pacific Corporation · UNP

$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.8B
$1.9B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.6B
$1.5B
$1.7B
$1.6B
$1.7B
$1.7B
$1.8B
$1.6B
$1.9B
$1.8B
$1.8B
$1.7B

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB

$132M
$193M
$150M
$169M
$163M
$159M
$173M
$193M
$242M
$217M
$277M
$291M
$286M
$213M
$327M
$339M
$313M
$204M
$363M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Canadian National Railway Company · CNI

28%
-14%
18%
33%
-12%
-24%
50%
-9.6%
-4.5%
-2.1%
-46%
5.3%
5.2%
5.0%
8.9%
-1.3%

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP

-39%
89%
139%
36%
73%
-12%
-20%
-3.3%
-32%
7.3%
18%
17%
37%
9.6%
-10%
-7.0%

CSX Corporation · CSX

0.4%
15%
3.4%
15%
-16%
-25%
-13%
-11%
-2.1%
8.0%
-13%
-27%
-14%
-22%
-1.8%
25%

FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL

-1,900%
-1,100%
-227%
-3,667%
50%
-149%
-16%

L.B. Foster Company · FSTR

-33%
-200%
50%
0.0%
-150%
0.0%
-89%

Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC

0.0%
27%
4.0%
-34%
-57%
-50%
-33%
-89%
107%
130%
39%
1,315%
4.2%
-35%
-12%
-27%

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX

-19%
-383%
236%
238%
0.0%
-8.1%
52%
124%
79%
35%
66%
-38%
-37%
-70%
-74%

Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN

15%
95%
70%
41%
-13%
70%
88%
142%
58%
-44%
-9.4%
-62%
-9.8%
380%
-6.9%

Union Pacific Corporation · UNP

2.1%
13%
-4.3%
0.0%
-15%
-19%
0.9%
0.7%
6.6%
9.4%
6.7%
-0.9%
12%
7.0%
4.9%
4.6%

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB

35%
23%
-18%
15%
14%
48%
36%
60%
51%
18%
-1.8%
18%
16%
9.4%
-4.2%
11%
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Union Pacific Corporation has the highest ROCE among the 10 Railroads companies compared here, at 4.3%. CSX Corporation is next at 3.7%. L.B. Foster Company has the highest ROCE change at +1.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 10 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Union Pacific Corporation leads ROCE at 4.3%, 0.6 percentage points above CSX Corporation. L.B. Foster Company has the strongest latest improvement at +1.5 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderUnion Pacific Corporation · 4.3%
Gap16.2% versus #2 · CSX Corporation
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage10/10 companies · 197 observations

Investor read: Union Pacific Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
Return on capital · company comparison
10/10 level · 10/10 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Union Pacific Corporation UNP4.3%+0.3 ppJun 2026
CSX Corporation CSX3.7%+0.5 ppJun 2026
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation WAB3.5%+0.6 ppJun 2026
Canadian National Railway Company CNI3.2%0.0 ppJun 2026
Norfolk Southern Corporation NSC2.7%−0.3 ppJun 2026
Trinity Industries, Inc. TRN2.5%+1.4 ppJun 2026
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited CP1.8%+0.1 ppJun 2026
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. GBX0.9%−2.0 ppJun 2026
L.B. Foster Company FSTR0.8%+1.5 ppMar 2026
FreightCar America, Inc. RAIL-0.3%−3.2 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Canadian National Railway Company · CNI

3.1%
3.6%
2.8%
4.1%
4.2%
4.1%
3.7%
3.5%
3.2%
3.8%
3.3%
3.2%
3.1%
3.2%
3.2%
3.2%
3.1%
3.2%
2.9%
3.2%

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP

3.5%
1.9%
1.3%
2.0%
2.0%
1.5%
1.2%
1.3%
1.6%
2.0%
1.6%
1.7%
1.6%
2.0%
1.7%
1.7%
1.7%
2.0%
1.5%
1.8%

CSX Corporation · CSX

3.8%
3.6%
3.4%
4.5%
4.1%
3.6%
3.8%
3.8%
3.2%
3.2%
3.4%
3.7%
3.4%
2.8%
2.6%
3.2%
2.7%
2.8%
3.1%
3.7%

FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL

-3.6%
0.1%
-0.6%
2.2%
-8.5%
-5.5%
1.0%
6.5%
1.0%
0.2%
3.6%
11%
6.1%
8.8%
2.9%
4.6%
8.3%
4.5%
-0.3%

L.B. Foster Company · FSTR

0.3%
-0.2%
-0.9%
0.9%
-0.4%
-2.4%
0.2%
2.5%
0.6%
0.1%
2.3%
1.8%
2.9%
1.3%
-0.7%
2.9%
3.1%
3.2%
0.8%

Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC

3.1%
3.1%
3.0%
3.5%
3.5%
3.3%
2.0%
1.6%
2.0%
2.1%
0.6%
3.0%
4.1%
2.9%
2.9%
3.0%
2.7%
2.3%
2.1%
2.7%

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX

0.5%
1.0%
0.8%
2.4%
-0.2%
2.4%
1.8%
2.2%
2.2%
2.2%
2.5%
3.9%
3.6%
2.7%
2.9%
2.0%
1.8%
0.7%
0.9%

Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN

1.0%
0.9%
0.7%
0.9%
1.2%
1.4%
0.9%
1.2%
1.2%
1.8%
1.4%
1.7%
1.5%
1.4%
1.2%
1.1%
1.4%
4.2%
1.3%
2.5%

Union Pacific Corporation · UNP

4.2%
4.2%
4.1%
4.3%
4.5%
4.1%
3.9%
3.7%
3.6%
3.9%
3.9%
3.9%
3.9%
4.1%
3.8%
4.0%
4.1%
3.8%
3.9%
4.3%

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB

1.4%
1.7%
1.5%
1.7%
1.7%
1.6%
1.8%
2.1%
2.5%
2.1%
2.7%
2.9%
2.9%
2.2%
3.1%
2.9%
3.0%
2.2%
3.2%
3.5%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Canadian National Railway Company · CNI

+1.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.9 pp
−0.6 pp
−1.0 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.1 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−0.3 pp
0.0 pp

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP

−1.5 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.4 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.1 pp

CSX Corporation · CSX

+0.3 pp
0.0 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.7 pp
0.0 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.5 pp

FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL

−4.9 pp
−5.6 pp
+1.6 pp
+4.3 pp
+9.5 pp
+5.7 pp
+2.6 pp
+4.0 pp
+5.1 pp
+8.6 pp
−0.7 pp
−5.9 pp
+2.2 pp
−4.3 pp
−3.2 pp

L.B. Foster Company · FSTR

−0.7 pp
−2.2 pp
+1.1 pp
+1.6 pp
+1.0 pp
+2.5 pp
+2.1 pp
−0.7 pp
+2.3 pp
+1.2 pp
−3.0 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.9 pp
+1.5 pp

Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC

+0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.5 pp
−1.2 pp
−1.4 pp
+1.4 pp
+2.1 pp
+0.8 pp
+2.3 pp
0.0 pp
−1.4 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.3 pp

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX

−0.7 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.0 pp
−0.2 pp
+2.4 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.4 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.8 pp
−2.0 pp
−2.0 pp

Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN

+0.2 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
0.0 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.1 pp
+2.8 pp
+0.1 pp
+1.4 pp

Union Pacific Corporation · UNP

+0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.2 pp
0.0 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB

+0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.4 pp
0.0 pp
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 10 Railroads companies compared here, at 0.27×. Trinity Industries, Inc. has the lowest P/E at 8.31×, so level and change sit with different companies. 1 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.27×. Only 1 of 10 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderThe Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · 0.27×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/10 companies · 48 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
Valuation · company comparison
1/10 level · 10/10 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation WAB3.336.2Jun 2026
Canadian National Railway Company CNI2.921.8Jun 2026
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited CP2.828.6Jun 2026
Trinity Industries, Inc. TRN2.48.3Jun 2026
Norfolk Southern Corporation NSC2.226.8Jun 2026
Union Pacific Corporation UNP2.122.0Jun 2026
CSX Corporation CSX1.527.5Jun 2026
The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. GBX0.314.0Jun 2026
L.B. Foster Company FSTR27.1Mar 2026
FreightCar America, Inc. RAIL10.8Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Canadian National Railway Company · CNI

1.2
2.9
1.3
3.4
2.3
1.2
2.2
2.9

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP

0.4
0.5
2.1
1.2
1.1
1.7
2.8

CSX Corporation · CSX

1.0
1.5

Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC

3.3
1.4
0.5
1.0
2.2

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX

0.7
4.5
0.3

Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN

0.4
0.8
2.4

Union Pacific Corporation · UNP

2.4
3.3
3.5
2.4
2.5
2.4
2.1

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB

2.2
3.3
1.6
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.2
1.8
2.0
2.4
3.3

P/E · reported quarter history

Canadian National Railway Company · CNI

22.1
22.5
24.5
19.8
21.2
21.7
20.0
20.5
20.0
19.5
21.1
19.1
18.7
20.8
19.6
19.5
17.8
17.9
18.8
21.8

Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited · CP

17.8
21.8
26.3
31.1
29.3
26.9
26.0
23.3
22.6
24.9
28.5
28.8
30.5
26.1
24.5
24.1
22.6
22.4
24.4
28.6

CSX Corporation · CSX

18.7
22.4
21.3
16.3
14.3
16.1
14.8
17.2
16.4
19.1
20.6
18.6
18.7
18.0
17.6
20.1
23.2
23.5
25.2
27.5

FreightCar America, Inc. · RAIL

3.7
10.2
10.8

L.B. Foster Company · FSTR

26.7
40.4
49.6
58.5
169.2
37.4
32.1
5.3
6.9
6.0
6.6
59.9
39.1
27.1

Norfolk Southern Corporation · NSC

20.6
24.6
23.0
18.1
15.4
17.8
16.3
20.4
21.6
29.5
41.0
27.2
23.3
20.3
16.2
17.3
22.9
22.6
24.2
26.8

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. · GBX

25.3
19.8
23.9
20.4
40.4
20.9
13.0
22.5
11.3
15.2
14.5
9.8
11.9
9.0
6.4
7.3
7.8
12.2
14.0

Trinity Industries, Inc. · TRN

79.5
19.8
13.2
11.5
29.0
26.5
26.2
26.5
20.9
17.6
14.7
16.0
21.4
16.6
22.3
24.4
8.7
10.3
8.3

Union Pacific Corporation · UNP

21.0
25.3
26.0
19.9
17.4
18.5
17.8
18.7
19.6
23.5
23.5
21.3
22.6
20.6
21.3
20.0
20.1
19.3
20.0
22.0

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation · WAB

35.9
31.1
30.3
24.0
22.5
28.9
28.2
29.4
25.4
28.0
28.5
27.7
30.3
31.4
28.4
31.3
29.1
31.3
35.4
36.2
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Railroads comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 10 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 10 Railroads companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Railroads company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Railroads comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 10 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Railroads sector outperforming S&P 500?

Railroads has outperformed S&P 500 by 11.7% over 52 weeks and 2% over 13 weeks. 7 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 10 beat the sector itself.

Which Railroads company is largest by revenue?

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. leads with revenue of $2,631 million, based on 3 of 10 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Which Railroads company is growing fastest?

L.B. Foster Company has the fastest current revenue growth at 11.7%, across 3 of 10 comparable companies.

Which Railroads company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

CSX Corporation ranks first at 62.8/100 with 57.8% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Railroads company has the lowest comparable PEG?

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.27, among 1 of 10 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Railroads comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Railroads company is the biggest?

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $2,631 million, ahead of L.B. Foster Company at $563 million. That covers 3 of 10 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.

Which Railroads company has the best profit margins?

Union Pacific Corporation has the highest operating margin at 39.5%, from 10 of 10 comparable companies. CSX Corporation shows the biggest recent improvement, at +5.6 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Railroads company makes the most profit?

The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. earns the most, at $109 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 3 of 10 comparable companies. The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at -54.2%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Railroads company earns the highest return on capital?

Union Pacific Corporation leads on return on capital employed at 4.3%, across 10 of 10 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Railroads stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — The Greenbrier Companies, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.27×. Only 1 of 10 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Railroads sector beating the market?

Railroads has outperformed S&P 500 by 11.7% over the last 52 weeks and 2% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 7 of 10 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Railroads stock has the strongest price momentum?

L.B. Foster Company has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Railroads company scores highest for research priority?

CSX Corporation scores 62.8 out of 100 with 57.8% evidence confidence, from 21.9 points on growth and earnings, 16.1 on capital efficiency, 9.2 on valuation and 15.6 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Railroads companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 10 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Railroads sector?

The 10 Railroads companies on this page carry $557,501 million of combined market value. Union Pacific Corporation is the largest at $176,054 million, about 32% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.

What is the Railroads sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 10 Railroads companies on this page is 26.8×, measured on the 10 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.

How is the Railroads sector performing?

7 of the 10 covered Railroads companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 11.7% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.

How many Railroads stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 10 listed Railroads companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI