Tanfac Industries Ltd (TANFACIND) — share price & stock analysis
From losses in FY14 and FY15 to record profits — the comeback is real, the price knows it.
Tanfac Industries Ltd (TANFACIND) trades at ₹2,470 as of 1 July 2026, up 26% over the past year — beating NIFTY 500 for 5 weeks. The machine reads this as turnaround, richly priced: from losses in FY14 and FY15 to record profits — the comeback is real, the price knows it. It trades at a P/E of 74.7× (the highest of its own range); the price is in Stage 2 — advancing, 81 weeks in; the business cycle reads DEEP CYCLICAL / EXPANSION. Fundamentals-momentum score: 56/100 (mixed).
Data as of 1 July 2026 · every number traces to its Screener source column · not investment advice.
- Market cap
- ₹5,238 Cr
- P/E
- 74.7×
- ROE
- 20.5%
- vs own 10-yr valuation
- highest ever
- Book value / share
- ₹187
- EPS (TTM)
- ₹35.2
- 10-yr median P/E
- 16.1×
- Revenue (FY26)
- ₹711 Cr
- Profit after tax (FY26)
- ₹70 Cr
- Weinstein stage
- Stage 2 (81 weeks)
- Data as of
- 1 July 2026
Profits swing violently in this business — real losses in FY14 and FY15. That is what “deep cyclical” means: the same company looks brilliant at the top of its cycle and broken at the bottom.net_profit
Where the clock stands now: earnings sit at 81% of their historical range, margins are mid-band, and the market pays the expensive end of its range (100th percentile). That reads as EXPANSION — the comfortable middle — the easy money off the bottom is made; from here the story has to keep delivering.net_profit
4 of the 6 things we track are currently moving the right way — most of the dashboard is turning up.
Where the levels actually stand: ROCE 24% — a high-quality engine; effectively no debt; margins mid-band. Momentum says which way things are moving; these say where they are.
Read this number for what it is: it measures the DIRECTION of change, not the quality of the business. A mediocre business getting better scores high here; a great one having a soft quarter scores low. Profit, sales and margins count double.
The market has pre-paid for growth that hasn’t arrived yet
Since Oct 2016, the stock is up 10,500% while earnings per share grew 1,306%. The difference is re-rating — investors paying more for the same rupee of profit.pricettm_eps
That works until it doesn’t: from here, earnings have to do the lifting, because the multiple has already done its part.
Today’s P/E of 74.7× is about the most expensive this stock has ever traded against its own 10-year history.pe_ratio
Data: Price, EPS and valuation (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | Price (₹) | EPS (TTM) (₹) | P/E (×) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16 | 23.0 | – | 9.2 |
| Dec 16 | 37.4 | 2.5 | 14.9 |
| Feb 17 | 41.9 | 2.1 | 20.0 |
| Apr 17 | 32.1 | – | – |
| Jun 17 | 24.1 | – | – |
| Aug 17 | 29.7 | – | – |
| Oct 17 | 46.2 | – | – |
| Dec 17 | 65.3 | – | – |
| Feb 18 | 57.0 | – | – |
| Apr 18 | 63.3 | – | – |
| Jun 18 | 53.9 | – | 11.2 |
| Aug 18 | 157 | 10.2 | 15.4 |
| Nov 18 | 146 | – | 14.3 |
| Jan 19 | 110 | 14.9 | 7.4 |
| Mar 19 | 110 | 17.4 | 6.3 |
| May 19 | 109 | 17.6 | 6.2 |
| Jul 19 | 68.9 | 18.1 | 3.8 |
| Sep 19 | 83.7 | 15.5 | 5.4 |
| Nov 19 | 56.2 | 10.3 | 5.4 |
| Jan 20 | 66.9 | 10.3 | 6.5 |
| Mar 20 | 40.9 | 8.3 | 4.9 |
| May 20 | 73.3 | 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Jul 20 | 105 | 8.5 | 12.3 |
| Sep 20 | 86.2 | 5.8 | 14.8 |
| Nov 20 | 89.5 | 7.4 | 12.1 |
| Jan 21 | 93.4 | – | 12.6 |
| Apr 21 | 127 | 10.6 | 12.0 |
| Jun 21 | 116 | – | 13.2 |
| Aug 21 | 156 | – | 17.8 |
| Oct 21 | 376 | 18.1 | 20.8 |
| Dec 21 | 249 | 20.7 | 12.0 |
| Feb 22 | 312 | 23.1 | 13.5 |
| Apr 22 | 306 | 23.2 | 13.2 |
| Jun 22 | 240 | – | 9.0 |
| Aug 22 | 260 | 20.5 | 12.7 |
| Oct 22 | 442 | 19.7 | 22.4 |
| Dec 22 | 420 | 19.8 | 21.2 |
| Feb 23 | 488 | – | 23.9 |
| Apr 23 | 803 | 28.1 | 28.6 |
| Jun 23 | 965 | 28.1 | 34.4 |
| Sep 23 | 940 | 32.8 | 28.7 |
| Nov 23 | 1,043 | 34.2 | 30.5 |
| Jan 24 | 1,197 | 34.2 | 35.0 |
| Mar 24 | 933 | 31.1 | 30.0 |
| May 24 | 1,106 | 26.3 | 42.1 |
| Jul 24 | 1,152 | 26.3 | 43.9 |
| Sep 24 | 1,075 | 22.7 | 47.4 |
| Nov 24 | 1,004 | 26.7 | 37.6 |
| Jan 25 | 1,549 | – | 58.1 |
| Mar 25 | 1,535 | 39.1 | 39.3 |
| May 25 | 1,530 | 44.1 | 34.7 |
| Jul 25 | 2,203 | 48.1 | 45.8 |
| Sep 25 | 2,302 | 48.1 | 47.9 |
| Nov 25 | 2,040 | 47.0 | 43.4 |
| Feb 26 | 1,975 | 37.4 | 52.8 |
| Mar 26 | 1,921 | 37.5 | 51.3 |
| May 26 | 2,182 | 35.1 | 62.1 |
| Jun 26 | 2,440 | 35.2 | 69.4 |
| Jul 26 | 2,470 | 35.2 | 70.2 |
Price is the weekly close (₹). EPS is trailing-twelve-month profit per share, anchored on Screener's own snapshots (the window starts at the first stable snapshot — earlier IPO-era share-count revisions are excluded, since they are not earnings events); between snapshots it is filled from price ÷ P/E (an exact identity), and any fill straying more than 18% from the neighbouring snapshots is dropped rather than shown. The lower panel is the P/E — what the market pays per rupee of profit; the dotted line is its long-run median (16.1×).
An uptrend that has held for 81 weeks
STAGE 2 · ADVANCING · 81 WEEKSEvery stock cycles through the same four seasons — a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Right now this one is in Stage 2: advancing, 81 weeks in, confirmed.stage
The price sits above its rising 200-day average (₹2,082 today) and its strength against the index is still improving — trends like this persist more often than they reverse, which is why the system rides them instead of guessing the top.dma_200
Beating NIFTY 500 for 5 weeks — relative strength is the market’s live opinion, and right now it is on this stock’s side.rs_mansfield
What would end it: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the house exit rule — mechanical, no debates.dma_200
Data: Weekly price, moving averages and stage (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | Price (₹) | 200-DMA (₹) | 50-DMA (₹) | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16 | 26.5 | 33.1 | 32.3 | 4 |
| May 16 | 16.4 | 15.6 | 15.0 | 4 |
| Aug 16 | 21.5 | 16.6 | 18.1 | 2 |
| Nov 16 | 23.3 | 19.4 | 22.8 | 2 |
| Jan 17 | 40.0 | 26.6 | 35.7 | 2 |
| Apr 17 | 32.0 | 29.5 | 32.8 | 2 |
| Jul 17 | 28.7 | 28.5 | 27.2 | 4 |
| Oct 17 | 39.2 | 31.1 | 35.3 | 2 |
| Dec 17 | 65.1 | 43.4 | 59.0 | 2 |
| Mar 18 | 56.5 | 51.1 | 60.2 | 2 |
| Jun 18 | 58.3 | 54.3 | 57.8 | 2 |
| Sep 18 | 164 | 69.7 | 102 | 2 |
| Nov 18 | 123 | 103 | 140 | 2 |
| Feb 19 | 103 | 104 | 104 | 2 |
| May 19 | 104 | 106 | 109 | 2 |
| Aug 19 | 77.8 | 94.7 | 81.2 | 4 |
| Nov 19 | 87.4 | 87.4 | 78.4 | 4 |
| Jan 20 | 67.3 | 76.0 | 63.0 | 4 |
| Apr 20 | 57.9 | 65.8 | 51.0 | 4 |
| Jul 20 | 85.2 | 69.6 | 74.5 | 2 |
| Oct 20 | 88.4 | 80.7 | 90.9 | 2 |
| Dec 20 | 91.9 | 84.2 | 89.5 | 2 |
| Mar 21 | 118 | 97.5 | 117 | 2 |
| Jun 21 | 120 | 108 | 120 | 2 |
| Sep 21 | 263 | 134 | 182 | 2 |
| Nov 21 | 245 | 203 | 269 | 2 |
| Feb 22 | 313 | 247 | 309 | 2 |
| May 22 | 259 | 265 | 288 | 2 |
| Aug 22 | 278 | 256 | 253 | 4 |
| Oct 22 | 474 | 309 | 390 | 2 |
| Jan 23 | 503 | 389 | 475 | 2 |
| Apr 23 | 682 | 440 | 512 | 2 |
| Jul 23 | 986 | 649 | 903 | 2 |
| Sep 23 | 963 | 767 | 919 | 2 |
| Dec 23 | 1,249 | 918 | 1,143 | 2 |
| Mar 24 | 972 | 968 | 1,000 | 2 |
| Jun 24 | 978 | 1,007 | 1,044 | 2 |
| Aug 24 | 1,088 | 1,044 | 1,089 | 2 |
| Nov 24 | 1,065 | 1,038 | 1,038 | 4 |
| Feb 25 | 1,684 | 1,239 | 1,537 | 2 |
| May 25 | 1,505 | 1,362 | 1,525 | 2 |
| Aug 25 | 2,083 | 1,601 | 1,973 | 2 |
| Oct 25 | 1,921 | 1,871 | 2,168 | 2 |
| Jan 26 | 2,242 | 1,956 | 2,123 | 2 |
| Apr 26 | 2,242 | 1,981 | 2,016 | 2 |
| Jun 26 | 2,145 | 2,053 | 2,103 | 2 |
| Jul 26 | 2,470 | 2,082 | 2,193 | 2 |
Out of the loss years — profitable again, still below its best
Over 12 years, sales went from ₹117 Cr to ₹711 Cr (about 16% a year), and profit from ₹−3.0 Cr to ₹70.0 Cr.revenuenet_profit
The books show real losses in FY14 and FY15 (worst: ₹−5.0 Cr). Everything about today’s cheap-looking numbers must be read against that history — the recovery is what you are buying.net_profit
Data: Revenue by year
| Period | Revenue (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 117 |
| FY15 | 120 |
| FY16 | 133 |
| FY17 | 126 |
| FY18 | 162 |
| FY19 | 222 |
| FY20 | 165 |
| FY21 | 148 |
| FY22 | 320 |
| FY23 | 375 |
| FY24 | 378 |
| FY25 | 557 |
| FY26 | 711 |
Data: Profit by year
| Period | Profit after tax (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | -3 |
| FY15 | -5 |
| FY16 | 0 |
| FY17 | 3 |
| FY18 | 10 |
| FY19 | 36 |
| FY20 | 17 |
| FY21 | 17 |
| FY22 | 53 |
| FY23 | 56 |
| FY24 | 52 |
| FY25 | 88 |
| FY26 | 70 |
Data: OPM % by year
| Period | OPM % (%) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 9.4 |
| FY15 | 6.7 |
| FY16 | 6.8 |
| FY17 | 11.1 |
| FY18 | 13.0 |
| FY19 | 23.9 |
| FY20 | 16.4 |
| FY21 | 22.3 |
| FY22 | 23.8 |
| FY23 | 20.3 |
| FY24 | 19.0 |
| FY25 | 23.5 |
| FY26 | 15.8 |
Sales grew 12% last quarter
Mar 26 sales were ₹193 Cr, up 12% on the same quarter last year.revenue
Data: Quarterly sales
| Period | Revenue (₹ Cr) | YoY growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 106 | – |
| Sep 23 | 81.0 | – |
| Dec 23 | 88.0 | – |
| Mar 24 | 103 | – |
| Jun 24 | 95.0 | -10.4 |
| Sep 24 | 112 | 38.3 |
| Dec 24 | 178 | 102.3 |
| Mar 25 | 172 | 67.0 |
| Jun 25 | 176 | 85.3 |
| Sep 25 | 169 | 50.9 |
| Dec 25 | 173 | -2.8 |
| Mar 26 | 193 | 12.2 |
Margins are compressing — 21% → 16% in a year
Of every ₹100 of sales, the company keeps ₹15.7 as operating profit (a year ago it kept ₹20.8).opm_pct
The gross margin moved the same way (35% → 29%), so this is about input costs and pricing power — the raw-material equation worsened.gpm_pctopm_pct
Data: Three margins, quarterly
| Period | Gross (%) | Operating (%) | Net (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 38.5 | 22.7 | 17.3 |
| Sep 23 | 38.8 | 19.2 | 14.0 |
| Dec 23 | 35.9 | 16.6 | 11.5 |
| Mar 24 | 32.5 | 15.9 | 12.3 |
| Jun 24 | 35.0 | 16.4 | 11.8 |
| Sep 24 | 43.3 | 24.4 | 17.3 |
| Dec 24 | 40.3 | 28.2 | 19.5 |
| Mar 25 | 34.9 | 20.8 | 13.2 |
| Jun 25 | 30.9 | 16.5 | 11.0 |
| Sep 25 | 32.1 | 15.9 | 10.2 |
| Dec 25 | 29.7 | 14.9 | 9.0 |
| Mar 26 | 29.2 | 15.7 | 9.3 |
Profit fell hard 22% — mostly from keeping more of each sale
Mar 26 profit after tax was ₹18.0 Cr, down 22% year on year.net_profit
Data: Quarterly profit after tax
| Period | PAT (₹ Cr) | YoY growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 18.0 | – |
| Sep 23 | 11.0 | – |
| Dec 23 | 10.0 | – |
| Mar 24 | 13.0 | – |
| Jun 24 | 11.0 | -38.9 |
| Sep 24 | 19.0 | 72.7 |
| Dec 24 | 35.0 | 250.0 |
| Mar 25 | 23.0 | 76.9 |
| Jun 25 | 19.0 | 72.7 |
| Sep 25 | 17.0 | -10.5 |
| Dec 25 | 16.0 | -54.3 |
| Mar 26 | 18.0 | -21.7 |
The single biggest driver was margins giving way.
Data: Where the profit change came from (Mar 25 → Mar 26)
| Component | Effect (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| PAT Mar 25 | 23 |
| More sales | +4 |
| Thinner margins | −10 |
| Depreciation | −1 |
| Tax | +1 |
| Everything else | +1 |
| PAT Mar 26 | 18 |
Most of the profit becomes cash — but not all
Over the last 5 profitable years, the business reported ₹319 Cr of profit and collected ₹197 Cr of operating cash — about 62% conversion.operating_cash_flownet_profit
The wrinkle is the latest year: FY26 collected ₹43.0 Cr against ₹70.0 Cr of reported profit — about 61%. One year isn’t a trend, but it is the line to watch.operating_cash_flownet_profit
Data: Cash collected vs profit reported (annual)
| Period | Operating cash flow (₹ Cr) | Profit after tax (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|
| FY14 | 19.0 | -3.0 |
| FY15 | 9.0 | -5.0 |
| FY16 | 16.0 | 0.0 |
| FY17 | 16.0 | 3.0 |
| FY18 | 17.0 | 10.0 |
| FY19 | 37.0 | 36.0 |
| FY20 | 22.0 | 17.0 |
| FY21 | 37.0 | 17.0 |
| FY22 | 44.0 | 53.0 |
| FY23 | 43.0 | 56.0 |
| FY24 | 34.0 | 52.0 |
| FY25 | 33.0 | 88.0 |
| FY26 | 43.0 | 70.0 |
The cash cycle is tightening — money comes home faster
One rupee now takes about 112 days to go out the door as materials and come back as collected cash — down from 129 days the year before.cash_conversion_cycle
The biggest mover: inventory moving faster off the shelf (112 → 76 days).inventory_days
Data: Days of cash locked up (annual)
| Period | Customers owe (debtor days) (days) | Stock on shelf (inventory days) (days) | We owe suppliers (payable days) (days) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY14 | 56.0 | 136 | 113 |
| FY15 | 52.0 | 106 | 89.0 |
| FY16 | 54.0 | 82.0 | 97.0 |
| FY17 | 46.0 | 66.0 | 69.0 |
| FY18 | 44.0 | 75.0 | 74.0 |
| FY19 | 38.0 | 107 | 90.0 |
| FY20 | 40.0 | 75.0 | 47.0 |
| FY21 | 40.0 | 134 | 142 |
| FY22 | 28.0 | 91.0 | 76.0 |
| FY23 | 49.0 | 89.0 | 78.0 |
| FY24 | 59.0 | 100 | 77.0 |
| FY25 | 65.0 | 112 | 48.0 |
| FY26 | 57.0 | 76.0 | 21.0 |
The asset base keeps compounding — this company builds
The productive asset base has gone from ₹59.0 Cr (FY14) to ₹212 Cr, with another ₹29.0 Cr of capacity under construction right now.fixed_assetscwip
The build is bigger than the cash engine: investing outflows (₹163 Cr) exceeded operating cash (₹110 Cr) over the last 3 years — the difference comes from debt or shareholders.investing_cash_flowoperating_cash_flow
Data: Assets in place vs under construction (annual)
| Period | Fixed assets (₹ Cr) | Under construction (CWIP) (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|
| FY14 | 59.0 | 0.0 |
| FY15 | 53.0 | 0.0 |
| FY16 | 49.0 | 0.0 |
| FY17 | 45.0 | 0.0 |
| FY18 | 41.0 | 0.0 |
| FY19 | 34.0 | 1.0 |
| FY20 | 33.0 | 6.0 |
| FY21 | 40.0 | 3.0 |
| FY22 | 40.0 | 12.0 |
| FY23 | 55.0 | 6.0 |
| FY24 | 61.0 | 29.0 |
| FY25 | 168 | 8.0 |
| FY26 | 212 | 29.0 |
Almost no debt — this company cannot be killed by a bad year
For every ₹100 shareholders have put in (and left in), the company has borrowed ₹25 — total borrowings have grown from ₹70.0 Cr to ₹93.0 Cr over the window.borrowings
Data: Total borrowings (annual)
| Period | Borrowings (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 70.0 |
| FY17 | 54.0 |
| FY18 | 43.0 |
| FY19 | 12.0 |
| FY20 | 0.0 |
| FY21 | 0.0 |
| FY22 | 0.0 |
| FY23 | 0.0 |
| FY24 | 0.0 |
| FY25 | 41.0 |
| FY26 | 93.0 |
Data: Debt vs shareholders’ money (annual)
| Period | Debt ÷ equity (x) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 14.0 |
| FY17 | 18.0 |
| FY18 | 3.3 |
| FY19 | 0.3 |
| FY20 | 0.0 |
| FY21 | 0.0 |
| FY22 | 0.0 |
| FY23 | 0.0 |
| FY24 | 0.0 |
| FY25 | 0.1 |
| FY26 | 0.3 |
Every ₹100 kept in the business earns ₹24 — a high-quality engine
Return on capital employed is 24.0% (a year ago: 42.0%). This is the single best test of business quality: what the company earns on the money it keeps.roce_pct
Data: Returns on capital (annual)
| Period | ROCE (%) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 6.0 |
| FY15 | 4.0 |
| FY16 | 7.0 |
| FY17 | 18.0 |
| FY18 | 29.0 |
| FY19 | 78.0 |
| FY20 | 37.0 |
| FY21 | 35.0 |
| FY22 | 67.0 |
| FY23 | 48.0 |
| FY24 | 33.0 |
| FY25 | 42.0 |
| FY26 | 24.0 |
Promoter holding dropped in one step — an event, not a slow exit
Promoters hold 48.7% (down 3.1 points over 8 quarters). Foreign funds own 1.5%, domestic funds 4.8%.promoters_pctfiis_pctdiis_pct
The promoter move came in a single step (Jun 26) — promoters rarely buy on-market, so a jump like this is almost always an allotment, infusion or restructuring: a capital event, not a slow accumulation of conviction. Worth knowing which, before reading it as a signal.promoters_pct
Data: Who holds the shares, quarterly
| Period | Promoters (%) | Foreign funds (%) | Domestic funds (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23 | 51.8 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Dec 23 | 51.8 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Mar 24 | 51.8 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Jun 24 | 51.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Sep 24 | 51.8 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Dec 24 | 51.8 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Mar 25 | 51.8 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Jun 25 | 51.8 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Sep 25 | 51.8 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Dec 25 | 51.8 | 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Mar 26 | 51.8 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Jun 26 | 48.7 | 1.5 | 4.8 |
A turnaround that stuck — the question is what’s left to re-rate
The numbers are genuinely mixed, and the price already assumes the good news continues.
Best thing in the data: cash generation rising (₹33.0 Cr → ₹43.0 Cr).operating_cash_flow
Biggest worry: free cash flow falling (₹−9.0 Cr → ₹−48.0 Cr).operating_cash_flow
Machine-written research from Screener data — every number traces to its source column. Sector Alpha is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser; nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell. Not investment advice.
Straight answers from the data
What does Tanfac Industries Ltd do?
Incorporated in 1972, Tanfac Industries Ltd is amongst the leading producers of Hydrofluoric Acid and its derivatives. It is listed in the Chemicals - Inorganic sector with a market capitalisation of ₹5,238 Cr.
What is Tanfac Industries Ltd's share price?
As of 1 July 2026, Tanfac Industries Ltd trades at ₹2,470, up 26% over the past year, with a market capitalisation of ₹5,238 Cr. Beating NIFTY 500 for 5 weeks. Prices are weekly closes from Screener data; this page refreshes with each weekly update.
What is Tanfac Industries Ltd's share price target?
Sector Alpha does not publish broker-style price targets. Our discounted-cash-flow model estimates Tanfac Industries Ltd's intrinsic value at ₹407 per share under base assumptions (bear ₹229, bull ₹612), against the current price of ₹2,470 — a 78% premium to model value. The current price already implies roughly 27% annual earnings growth. These are model estimates, not forecasts — treat them as one input alongside the valuation history below, not as a target.
Is Tanfac Industries Ltd stock overvalued or undervalued?
Tanfac Industries Ltd trades at a P/E of 74.7× — the highest of its own 9.7-year trading range (median 16.1×), which is near the top of its own historical range. The market has pre-paid for growth that hasn’t arrived yet. Since Oct 2016, the stock is up 10,500% while earnings per share grew 1,306%. The difference is re-rating — investors paying more for the same rupee of profit.
What did Tanfac Industries Ltd report in its latest quarterly results?
In its most recent reported quarter (Q4 FY26, quarter ended March 2026): Mar 26 sales were ₹193 Cr, up 12% on the same quarter last year. Mar 26 profit after tax was ₹18.0 Cr, down 22% year on year. Figures are from Screener-scraped quarterly filings; the page updates when the next quarter is filed.
Is Tanfac Industries Ltd growing?
Sales grew 12% last quarter. Mar 26 sales were ₹193 Cr, up 12% on the same quarter last year.
Are Tanfac Industries Ltd's profits growing?
Profit fell hard 22% — mostly from keeping more of each sale. Mar 26 profit after tax was ₹18.0 Cr, down 22% year on year.
What are Tanfac Industries Ltd's operating margins?
Margins are compressing — 21% → 16% in a year. In the most recent quarter, of every ₹100 of sales, the company keeps ₹15.7 as operating profit (a year ago it kept ₹20.8).
What is Tanfac Industries Ltd's long-term growth record?
Revenue grew from ₹117 Cr in FY14 to ₹711 Cr in FY26 — a 16.2% compound annual growth rate over 12 years. Profit CAGR is not meaningful across this span — the company reported losses in FY14, FY15.
Is Tanfac Industries Ltd stock in an uptrend?
An uptrend that has held for 81 weeks. Tanfac Industries Ltd is in Stage 2 — advancing, 81 weeks in (confirmed). Stages follow Stan Weinstein's four-phase read of weekly price against the 200-day average: basing (1), advancing (2), topping (3), declining (4).
Why is Tanfac Industries Ltd stock rising?
The price is up 26% over the past year, in a confirmed Stage 2 uptrend (81 weeks), and has beaten NIFTY 500 for 5 weeks. Since 2016, the price is up 10,500% while earnings per share moved 1,306%.
Is Tanfac Industries Ltd beating the NIFTY 500?
Yes — beating NIFTY 500 for 5 weeks, as of 1 July 2026. Relative strength is measured weekly against the NIFTY 500 (Mansfield RS): a positive reading means the stock has outperformed the index over the trailing window, week after week.
Where is Tanfac Industries Ltd in its business cycle?
The data reads Tanfac Industries Ltd as a deep cyclical business currently in its expansion phase — earnings at 81% of their own historical range, valuation at its all-time highs. Profits swing violently in this business — real losses in FY14 and FY15. That is what “deep cyclical” means: the same company looks brilliant at the top of its cycle and broken at the bottom.
Who owns Tanfac Industries Ltd — what is the promoter holding?
Promoters hold 48.7% (down 3.1 points over 8 quarters). Foreign funds own 1.5%, domestic funds 4.8%. The promoter move came in a single step (Jun 26) — promoters rarely buy on-market, so a jump like this is almost always an allotment, infusion or restructuring: a capital event, not a slow accumulation of conviction. Worth knowing which, before reading it as a signal. Shareholding is from Screener's quarterly filings data.
Does Tanfac Industries Ltd have too much debt?
Almost no debt — this company cannot be killed by a bad year. For every ₹100 shareholders have put in (and left in), the company has borrowed ₹25 — total borrowings have grown from ₹70.0 Cr to ₹93.0 Cr over the window.
What is the bull case for Tanfac Industries Ltd?
From losses in FY14 and FY15 to record profits — the comeback is real, the price knows it. Best thing in the data: cash generation rising (₹33.0 Cr → ₹43.0 Cr). Sales grew 12% last quarter.
What is the bear case for Tanfac Industries Ltd — what could break the story?
Biggest worry: free cash flow falling (₹−9.0 Cr → ₹−48.0 Cr). Two quarters of sales reversing would kill this story. The nearest-term thing to watch: if quarterly growth slips below 6%, the story weakens. This falsification condition is stated up front so the thesis can be checked against incoming quarters, not defended after the fact.
Is Tanfac Industries Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
Sector Alpha does not publish buy or sell recommendations — this is a research read, not advice. What the data says: a turnaround that stuck — the question is what’s left to re-rate. The numbers are genuinely mixed, and the price already assumes the good news continues. Across the 7-model scorecard the composite research signal is on watch at 45% confidence. This is machine-written research compiled from Screener data — every number traces to its source — and it is not investment advice. Do your own diligence.