Power Finance Corporation Ltd (PFC) — share price & stock analysis
Bad loans have fallen from 3.5% to 0.7%, profits are compounding — and the price has started to notice.
Power Finance Corporation Ltd (PFC) trades at ₹431 as of 1 July 2026, up 4.2% over the past year — beating NIFTY 500 for 25 weeks. The machine reads this as steady growth, richly priced: bad loans have fallen from 3.5% to 0.7%, profits are compounding — and the price has started to notice. It trades at a P/BV of 1.1× (the 75th percentile of its own range); the price is in Stage 2 — advancing, 16 weeks in; the business cycle reads CYCLICAL / AT PEAK. Fundamentals-momentum score: 69/100 (mostly improving).
Data as of 1 July 2026 · every number traces to its Screener source column · not investment advice.
- Market cap
- ₹1,42,152 Cr
- P/BV
- 1.07×
- ROE
- 20.7%
- vs own 10-yr valuation
- 75th pctile
- Book value / share
- ₹403
- EPS (TTM)
- ₹78.3
- 10-yr median P/BV
- 0.7×
- Revenue (FY26)
- ₹1,15,444 Cr
- Profit after tax (FY26)
- ₹33,625 Cr
- Weinstein stage
- Stage 2 (16 weeks)
- Data as of
- 1 July 2026
Profits breathe with a cycle here — profit drawdowns of ~64% along the way. Swings like that are normal for this business, not news.net_profit
Where the clock stands now: earnings sit at 100% of their historical range, margins are near the top of their band, and the market pays the expensive end of its range (75th percentile). That reads as AT PEAK — everything looks great at once — record earnings, top-of-band margins, a full price. That is exactly when cycles turn, and no one rings a bell.net_profit
2 of the 5 things we track are currently moving the right way — most of the dashboard is turning up.
Where the levels actually stand: ROE 21% — a genuinely good bank; GNPA 0.7% — clean book; the spread is near its 13-year high. Momentum says which way things are moving; these say where they are.
Read this number for what it is: it measures the DIRECTION of change, not the quality of the business. A mediocre business getting better scores high here; a great one having a soft quarter scores low. Profit, lending and bad loans count double, and a quarter of the score comes from our earnings-recovery lens (is the profit cycle turning up off its trough?).
The market has pre-paid for growth that hasn’t arrived yet
Since Aug 2018, the stock is up 553% while earnings per share grew 287%. The difference is re-rating — investors paying more for the same rupee of profit.pricettm_eps
That works until it doesn’t: from here, earnings have to do the lifting, because the multiple has already done its part.
Today’s P/BV of 1.1× means the market is paying up — this is the expensive end of its own history since 2018 (75th percentile).pb_ratio
Data: Price, EPS and valuation (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | Price (₹) | EPS (TTM) (₹) | P/BV (×) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18 | 69.4 | – | 0.6 |
| Oct 18 | 60.7 | 20.2 | 0.5 |
| Nov 18 | 69.2 | 20.3 | 0.6 |
| Jan 19 | 82.6 | 20.1 | 0.7 |
| Mar 19 | 90.5 | 20.1 | 0.8 |
| May 19 | 87.2 | – | 0.7 |
| Jul 19 | 99.8 | 30.2 | 0.8 |
| Sep 19 | 86.8 | 29.9 | 0.6 |
| Nov 19 | 88.9 | 29.6 | 0.6 |
| Dec 19 | 92.0 | 30.7 | 0.6 |
| Feb 20 | 106 | 28.6 | 0.7 |
| Apr 20 | 74.9 | 28.8 | 0.5 |
| Jun 20 | 66.9 | – | 0.5 |
| Aug 20 | 68.4 | 21.4 | 0.5 |
| Oct 20 | 70.9 | 22.9 | 0.4 |
| Nov 20 | 86.6 | 27.1 | 0.5 |
| Jan 21 | 92.5 | 27.2 | 0.5 |
| Mar 21 | 98.8 | 28.2 | 0.6 |
| May 21 | 90.8 | 28.4 | 0.6 |
| Jul 21 | 97.3 | 36.0 | 0.7 |
| Sep 21 | 103 | 38.1 | 0.6 |
| Oct 21 | 107 | 38.0 | 0.5 |
| Dec 21 | 94.4 | 39.4 | 0.5 |
| Feb 22 | 94.7 | 41.2 | 0.5 |
| Apr 22 | 94.6 | 41.1 | 0.5 |
| Jun 22 | 86.2 | 43.1 | 0.5 |
| Aug 22 | 95.0 | 43.2 | 0.5 |
| Sep 22 | 83.7 | 41.8 | 0.4 |
| Nov 22 | 109 | 43.7 | 0.5 |
| Jan 23 | 120 | 43.0 | 0.5 |
| Mar 23 | 125 | 43.0 | 0.5 |
| May 23 | 132 | 43.9 | 0.6 |
| Jul 23 | 177 | 47.9 | 0.8 |
| Sep 23 | 206 | 51.5 | 0.8 |
| Oct 23 | 238 | 51.6 | 0.8 |
| Dec 23 | 387 | 54.5 | 1.4 |
| Feb 24 | 434 | 57.1 | 1.5 |
| Apr 24 | 403 | 56.8 | 1.6 |
| Jun 24 | 484 | 59.7 | 1.9 |
| Aug 24 | 526 | 59.9 | 1.7 |
| Sep 24 | 494 | 62.5 | 1.6 |
| Nov 24 | 478 | 64.6 | 1.4 |
| Jan 25 | 433 | 63.7 | 1.3 |
| Mar 25 | 388 | 67.0 | 1.2 |
| May 25 | 386 | 67.7 | 1.3 |
| Jul 25 | 413 | 70.0 | 1.4 |
| Aug 25 | 380 | 73.0 | 1.1 |
| Oct 25 | 394 | 74.3 | 1.0 |
| Dec 25 | 339 | 75.3 | 0.9 |
| Feb 26 | 401 | 77.0 | 1.0 |
| Apr 26 | 402 | 75.9 | 1.0 |
| May 26 | 446 | 78.5 | 1.1 |
| Jun 26 | 432 | 78.5 | 1.1 |
| Jul 26 | 431 | 78.3 | 1.1 |
Price is the weekly close (₹). EPS is trailing-twelve-month profit per share, anchored on Screener's own snapshots (the window starts at the first stable snapshot — earlier IPO-era share-count revisions are excluded, since they are not earnings events); between snapshots it is filled from price ÷ P/E (an exact identity), and any fill straying more than 18% from the neighbouring snapshots is dropped rather than shown. The lower panel is the P/BV — what the market pays per rupee of book value; the dotted line is its long-run median (0.7×).
An uptrend that has held for 16 weeks
STAGE 2 · ADVANCING · 16 WEEKSEvery stock cycles through the same four seasons — a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Right now this one is in Stage 2: advancing, 16 weeks in, confirmed.stage
The price sits above its rising 200-day average (₹415 today) — trends like this persist more often than they reverse, which is why the system rides them instead of guessing the top.dma_200
Beating NIFTY 500 for 25 weeks — relative strength is the market’s live opinion, and right now it is on this stock’s side.rs_mansfield
What would end it: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the house exit rule — mechanical, no debates.dma_200
Data: Weekly price, moving averages and stage (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | Price (₹) | 200-DMA (₹) | 50-DMA (₹) | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16 | 62.2 | 86.0 | 69.3 | 4 |
| May 16 | 67.2 | 78.5 | 68.5 | 4 |
| Aug 16 | 88.8 | 77.7 | 79.7 | 4 |
| Nov 16 | 91.1 | 85.9 | 95.5 | 2 |
| Jan 17 | 111 | 93.2 | 103 | 2 |
| Apr 17 | 125 | 102 | 116 | 2 |
| Jul 17 | 99.2 | 106 | 107 | 2 |
| Oct 17 | 100 | 103 | 101 | 4 |
| Dec 17 | 97.4 | 102 | 99.2 | 4 |
| Mar 18 | 68.1 | 95.0 | 82.8 | 4 |
| Jun 18 | 66.0 | 82.5 | 67.3 | 4 |
| Sep 18 | 69.4 | 74.5 | 65.6 | 4 |
| Nov 18 | 69.2 | 73.2 | 73.2 | 4 |
| Feb 19 | 89.0 | 76.9 | 81.8 | 2 |
| May 19 | 87.2 | 83.2 | 90.1 | 2 |
| Aug 19 | 87.4 | 89.5 | 94.5 | 2 |
| Nov 19 | 88.9 | 86.4 | 83.2 | 4 |
| Jan 20 | 93.1 | 89.0 | 91.8 | 2 |
| Apr 20 | 74.9 | 86.9 | 80.7 | 4 |
| Jul 20 | 66.9 | 78.6 | 69.2 | 4 |
| Oct 20 | 70.9 | 75.6 | 72.0 | 4 |
| Dec 20 | 91.3 | 78.4 | 84.8 | 2 |
| Mar 21 | 98.8 | 87.9 | 101 | 2 |
| Jun 21 | 104 | 89.8 | 95.0 | 2 |
| Sep 21 | 103 | 95.0 | 101 | 2 |
| Nov 21 | 95.2 | 101 | 107 | 2 |
| Feb 22 | 94.7 | 99.2 | 97.8 | 4 |
| May 22 | 84.2 | 96.1 | 92.4 | 4 |
| Aug 22 | 95.0 | 92.2 | 89.0 | 4 |
| Oct 22 | 91.0 | 90.8 | 87.3 | 4 |
| Jan 23 | 120 | 99.9 | 113 | 2 |
| Apr 23 | 129 | 109 | 122 | 2 |
| Jul 23 | 177 | 127 | 154 | 2 |
| Sep 23 | 252 | 166 | 216 | 2 |
| Dec 23 | 387 | 231 | 330 | 2 |
| Mar 24 | 381 | 312 | 409 | 2 |
| Jun 24 | 484 | 365 | 448 | 2 |
| Aug 24 | 550 | 432 | 514 | 2 |
| Nov 24 | 478 | 451 | 473 | 2 |
| Feb 25 | 371 | 446 | 425 | 4 |
| May 25 | 386 | 429 | 410 | 4 |
| Aug 25 | 404 | 423 | 415 | 4 |
| Oct 25 | 394 | 414 | 403 | 4 |
| Jan 26 | 375 | 392 | 366 | 4 |
| Apr 26 | 435 | 398 | 403 | 2 |
| Jun 26 | 421 | 413 | 431 | 2 |
| Jul 26 | 431 | 415 | 431 | 2 |
10 of the last 12 years ended with profits higher — quiet, steady compounding
Over 12 years, income went from ₹21,407 Cr to ₹1,15,444 Cr (about 15% a year), and profit from ₹5,462 Cr to ₹33,625 Cr.revenuenet_profit
Margins took a round trip — down to 34.3% in FY20, back to 39.9% now. The profit growth survived the squeeze.revenue−interest_expense
Data: Revenue by year
| Period | Revenue (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 21,407 |
| FY15 | 24,988 |
| FY16 | 27,861 |
| FY17 | 27,581 |
| FY18 | 48,624 |
| FY19 | 54,106 |
| FY20 | 62,189 |
| FY21 | 71,656 |
| FY22 | 76,262 |
| FY23 | 77,568 |
| FY24 | 91,508 |
| FY25 | 1,07,106 |
| FY26 | 1,15,444 |
Data: Profit by year
| Period | Profit after tax (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 5,462 |
| FY15 | 6,004 |
| FY16 | 6,184 |
| FY17 | 2,236 |
| FY18 | 8,797 |
| FY19 | 12,640 |
| FY20 | 9,477 |
| FY21 | 15,716 |
| FY22 | 18,768 |
| FY23 | 21,179 |
| FY24 | 26,461 |
| FY25 | 30,514 |
| FY26 | 33,625 |
Data: Spread % by year
| Period | Spread % (%) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 39.0 |
| FY15 | 38.1 |
| FY16 | 40.2 |
| FY17 | 39.2 |
| FY18 | 37.7 |
| FY19 | 36.0 |
| FY20 | 34.3 |
| FY21 | 37.6 |
| FY22 | 41.4 |
| FY23 | 39.4 |
| FY24 | 36.7 |
| FY25 | 39.6 |
| FY26 | 39.9 |
Interest income fell 1% — the book is shrinking or repricing down
Mar 26 income was ₹28,920 Cr, down 1% on a year ago. A bank grows by lending more and charging well — this line is both together.revenue
Data: Quarterly interest + fee income
| Period | Income (₹ Cr) | YoY growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 21,009 | – |
| Sep 23 | 22,391 | – |
| Dec 23 | 23,572 | – |
| Mar 24 | 24,141 | – |
| Jun 24 | 24,717 | 17.6 |
| Sep 24 | 25,722 | 14.9 |
| Dec 24 | 26,798 | 13.7 |
| Mar 25 | 29,265 | 21.2 |
| Jun 25 | 28,539 | 15.5 |
| Sep 25 | 28,890 | 12.3 |
| Dec 25 | 29,095 | 8.6 |
| Mar 26 | 28,920 | -1.2 |
Deposits are getting expensive — the spread is compressing
Of every ₹100 of interest the bank earns, ₹60 goes straight out as interest on deposits and borrowings. It keeps ₹40 — down 3 points from a year ago.revenueinterest_expense
Data: Share of interest income kept, quarterly
| Period | Spread kept (%) |
|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 34.9 |
| Sep 23 | 36.1 |
| Dec 23 | 37.1 |
| Mar 24 | 37.2 |
| Jun 24 | 37.2 |
| Sep 24 | 37.8 |
| Dec 24 | 38.2 |
| Mar 25 | 43.4 |
| Jun 25 | 39.7 |
| Sep 25 | 40.1 |
| Dec 25 | 39.6 |
| Mar 26 | 40.1 |
Bad loans are healing — from a worst of 3.5% (Jun 23) to 0.7%
₹0.7 of every ₹100 lent is currently stuck with borrowers who’ve stopped paying — down from ₹3.5 at the Jun 23 worst. After the money already set aside, the true exposure is 0.1%.gross_npa_pctnet_npa_pct
Falling bad loans do double duty: less money set aside for losses flows straight back into profit — and the profit bridge this year shows exactly that. The tailwind eventually runs out; the loan book has to take over.gross_npa_pctnet_profit
Data: Bad loans as % of the book, quarterly
| Period | Gross NPA (%) | Net NPA (after provisions) (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 3.5 | 1.0 |
| Sep 23 | 3.4 | 1.0 |
| Dec 23 | 3.1 | 0.9 |
| Mar 24 | 3.0 | 0.9 |
| Jun 24 | 3.0 | 0.8 |
| Sep 24 | 2.6 | 0.8 |
| Dec 24 | 2.3 | 0.7 |
| Mar 25 | 1.6 | 0.4 |
| Jun 25 | 1.5 | 0.3 |
| Sep 25 | 1.5 | 0.3 |
| Dec 25 | 1.3 | 0.2 |
| Mar 26 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
Profit is flat
Mar 26 profit was ₹8,598 Cr, up 3% on last year — earnings per share of ₹21.21.net_profiteps
Data: Quarterly profit after tax
| Period | PAT (₹ Cr) | YoY growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 5,982 | – |
| Sep 23 | 6,628 | – |
| Dec 23 | 6,294 | – |
| Mar 24 | 7,556 | – |
| Jun 24 | 7,182 | 20.1 |
| Sep 24 | 7,215 | 8.9 |
| Dec 24 | 7,760 | 23.3 |
| Mar 25 | 8,358 | 10.6 |
| Jun 25 | 8,981 | 25.0 |
| Sep 25 | 7,834 | 8.6 |
| Dec 25 | 8,212 | 5.8 |
| Mar 26 | 8,598 | 2.9 |
The biggest force in the bridge: running costs and provisions.
Data: Where the profit change came from (Mar 25 → Mar 26)
| Component | Effect (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| PAT Mar 25 | 8,358 |
| More interest income | −345 |
| Costlier deposits | −766 |
| Running costs & provisions | +1,732 |
| Fees & other income | −83 |
| Tax | −298 |
| PAT Mar 26 | 8,598 |
You are paying near the top of its own range
Today you pay ₹1.07 for every ₹1 of book value, against a long-run median of ₹0.70. It has traded cheaper than this only 75% of the time since 2016.pb_ratio
Data: Price-to-book over time (weekly) (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | P/BV (x) |
|---|---|
| Feb 16 | 0.6 |
| Apr 16 | 0.7 |
| Jul 16 | 0.8 |
| Sept 16 | 0.9 |
| Nov 16 | 1.0 |
| Feb 17 | 1.0 |
| Apr 17 | 1.1 |
| Jun 17 | 0.9 |
| Sept 17 | 0.9 |
| Nov 17 | 0.9 |
| Jan 18 | 0.9 |
| Mar 18 | 0.6 |
| Jun 18 | 0.6 |
| Aug 18 | 0.6 |
| Oct 18 | 0.6 |
| Jan 19 | 0.7 |
| Mar 19 | 0.7 |
| May 19 | 0.8 |
| Aug 19 | 0.7 |
| Oct 19 | 0.5 |
| Dec 19 | 0.6 |
| Feb 20 | 0.6 |
| May 20 | 0.5 |
| Jul 20 | 0.5 |
| Sept 20 | 0.5 |
| Dec 20 | 0.5 |
| Feb 21 | 0.6 |
| Apr 21 | 0.6 |
| Jul 21 | 0.7 |
| Sept 21 | 0.6 |
| Nov 21 | 0.5 |
| Jan 22 | 0.5 |
| Apr 22 | 0.5 |
| Jun 22 | 0.4 |
| Aug 22 | 0.5 |
| Nov 22 | 0.4 |
| Jan 23 | 0.5 |
| Mar 23 | 0.5 |
| Jun 23 | 0.7 |
| Aug 23 | 1.0 |
| Oct 23 | 0.9 |
| Dec 23 | 1.4 |
| Mar 24 | 1.5 |
| May 24 | 1.8 |
| Jul 24 | 2.1 |
| Oct 24 | 1.4 |
| Dec 24 | 1.5 |
| Feb 25 | 1.2 |
| May 25 | 1.3 |
| Jul 25 | 1.4 |
| Sept 25 | 1.1 |
| Nov 25 | 0.9 |
| Feb 26 | 1.1 |
| Apr 26 | 1.1 |
| Jun 26 | 1.1 |
| Jul 26 | 1.1 |
The owners aren’t moving
Promoters hold 56.0%, essentially unchanged. Foreign funds own 19.6%, domestic funds 15.1%.promoters_pctfiis_pctdiis_pct
Institutions buying while the story develops is the market’s quiet vote of confidence — they meet management, you don’t.
Meanwhile domestic funds have been the sellers — from 18.1% to 15.1% over the window. Someone on the other side of the table disagrees; both sides count.diis_pct
Data: Who holds the shares, quarterly
| Period | Promoters (%) | Foreign funds (%) | Domestic funds (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 56.0 | 17.5 | 18.1 |
| Sep 23 | 56.0 | 16.9 | 17.9 |
| Dec 23 | 56.0 | 17.9 | 17.5 |
| Mar 24 | 56.0 | 17.2 | 18.2 |
| Jun 24 | 56.0 | 17.9 | 17.0 |
| Sep 24 | 56.0 | 17.7 | 17.4 |
| Dec 24 | 56.0 | 18.0 | 17.2 |
| Mar 25 | 56.0 | 18.8 | 16.2 |
| Jun 25 | 56.0 | 18.7 | 16.1 |
| Sep 25 | 56.0 | 18.8 | 16.0 |
| Dec 25 | 56.0 | 18.3 | 15.5 |
| Mar 26 | 56.0 | 19.6 | 15.1 |
- Promoters are not selling. Their stake has moved 0.1 points or less in 8 quarters — it sits at 56.0%.promoters_pct
- There is no new bad-loan cycle forming — GNPA is at or near its 8-quarter low of 0.66%.gross_npa_pct
A good business — the question is the price
The numbers are genuinely mixed, and the price already assumes the good news continues.
Best thing in the data: bad loans improving (1.6% → 0.7%).gross_npa_pct
Biggest worry: domestic-fund holding falling (16.2% → 15.1%).diis_pct
Machine-written research from Screener data — every number traces to its source column. Sector Alpha is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser; nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell. Not investment advice.
Straight answers from the data
What does Power Finance Corporation Ltd do?
Power Finance Corporation Limited is a Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking NBFC registered with the RBI as an Infrastructure Finance Company. It is engaged in extending financial assistance to the Indian power sector. [1]. It is listed in the Finance - PSU Lending sector with a market capitalisation of ₹1,42,152 Cr.
What is Power Finance Corporation Ltd's share price?
As of 1 July 2026, Power Finance Corporation Ltd trades at ₹431, up 4.2% over the past year, with a market capitalisation of ₹1,42,152 Cr. Beating NIFTY 500 for 25 weeks. Prices are weekly closes from Screener data; this page refreshes with each weekly update.
What is Power Finance Corporation Ltd's share price target?
Sector Alpha does not publish broker-style price targets. Our discounted-cash-flow model estimates Power Finance Corporation Ltd's intrinsic value at ₹1,411 per share under base assumptions (bear ₹806, bull ₹1,411), against the current price of ₹431 — a 226% margin of safety. The current price already implies roughly -7% annual earnings growth. These are model estimates, not forecasts — treat them as one input alongside the valuation history below, not as a target.
Is Power Finance Corporation Ltd stock overvalued or undervalued?
Power Finance Corporation Ltd trades at a P/BV of 1.1× — the 75th percentile of its own 7.9-year trading range (median 0.7×), which is above the middle of its own historical range. The market has pre-paid for growth that hasn’t arrived yet. Since Aug 2018, the stock is up 553% while earnings per share grew 287%. The difference is re-rating — investors paying more for the same rupee of profit.
What did Power Finance Corporation Ltd report in its latest quarterly results?
In its most recent reported quarter (Q4 FY26, quarter ended March 2026): Mar 26 income was ₹28,920 Cr, down 1% on a year ago. A bank grows by lending more and charging well — this line is both together. Mar 26 profit was ₹8,598 Cr, up 3% on last year — earnings per share of ₹21.21. Figures are from Screener-scraped quarterly filings; the page updates when the next quarter is filed.
Is Power Finance Corporation Ltd growing?
Interest income fell 1% — the book is shrinking or repricing down. Mar 26 income was ₹28,920 Cr, down 1% on a year ago. A bank grows by lending more and charging well — this line is both together.
Are Power Finance Corporation Ltd's profits growing?
Profit is flat. Mar 26 profit was ₹8,598 Cr, up 3% on last year — earnings per share of ₹21.21.
How much of its interest income does Power Finance Corporation Ltd keep?
Deposits are getting expensive — the spread is compressing. Of every ₹100 of interest the bank earns, ₹60 goes straight out as interest on deposits and borrowings. It keeps ₹40 — down 3 points from a year ago.
What is Power Finance Corporation Ltd's long-term growth record?
Revenue grew from ₹21,407 Cr in FY14 to ₹1,15,444 Cr in FY26 — a 15.1% compound annual growth rate over 12 years. Profit after tax compounded at 16.4% over the same period (₹5,462 Cr → ₹33,625 Cr).
Is Power Finance Corporation Ltd stock in an uptrend?
An uptrend that has held for 16 weeks. Power Finance Corporation Ltd is in Stage 2 — advancing, 16 weeks in (confirmed). Stages follow Stan Weinstein's four-phase read of weekly price against the 200-day average: basing (1), advancing (2), topping (3), declining (4).
Why is Power Finance Corporation Ltd stock rising?
The price is up 4% over the past year, in a confirmed Stage 2 uptrend (16 weeks), and has beaten NIFTY 500 for 25 weeks. Since 2018, the price is up 553% while earnings per share moved 287%.
Is Power Finance Corporation Ltd beating the NIFTY 500?
Yes — beating NIFTY 500 for 25 weeks, as of 1 July 2026. Relative strength is measured weekly against the NIFTY 500 (Mansfield RS): a positive reading means the stock has outperformed the index over the trailing window, week after week.
Where is Power Finance Corporation Ltd in its business cycle?
The data reads Power Finance Corporation Ltd as a cyclical business currently in its at peak phase — earnings at an all-time high for this company, valuation at the 75th percentile. Profits breathe with a cycle here — profit drawdowns of ~64% along the way. Swings like that are normal for this business, not news.
Who owns Power Finance Corporation Ltd — what is the promoter holding?
Promoters hold 56.0%, essentially unchanged. Foreign funds own 19.6%, domestic funds 15.1%. Institutions buying while the story develops is the market’s quiet vote of confidence — they meet management, you don’t. Shareholding is from Screener's quarterly filings data.
How is Power Finance Corporation Ltd's asset quality?
Bad loans are healing — from a worst of 3.5% (Jun 23) to 0.7%. ₹0.7 of every ₹100 lent is currently stuck with borrowers who’ve stopped paying — down from ₹3.5 at the Jun 23 worst. After the money already set aside, the true exposure is 0.1%.
What is the bull case for Power Finance Corporation Ltd?
Bad loans have fallen from 3.5% to 0.7%, profits are compounding — and the price has started to notice. Best thing in the data: bad loans improving (1.6% → 0.7%). Interest income fell 1% — the book is shrinking or repricing down.
What is the bear case for Power Finance Corporation Ltd — what could break the story?
Biggest worry: domestic-fund holding falling (16.2% → 15.1%). Two quarters of bad loans reversing would kill this story. The nearest-term thing to watch: a single quarter of GNPA rising again would put this story on watch. This falsification condition is stated up front so the thesis can be checked against incoming quarters, not defended after the fact.
Is Power Finance Corporation Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
Sector Alpha does not publish buy or sell recommendations — this is a research read, not advice. What the data says: a good business — the question is the price. The numbers are genuinely mixed, and the price already assumes the good news continues. Across the 7-model scorecard the composite research signal is on watch at 62% confidence. This is machine-written research compiled from Screener data — every number traces to its source — and it is not investment advice. Do your own diligence.