Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd (MRPL) — share price & stock analysis
From losses in FY15 and FY20 and FY21 to record profits — the comeback is real, the price knows it.
Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd (MRPL) trades at ₹148 as of 1 July 2026, down 1.8% over the past year — trailing NIFTY 500 for 4 weeks. The machine reads this as turnaround, fairly priced: from losses in FY15 and FY20 and FY21 to record profits — the comeback is real, the price knows it. It trades at a P/E of 13.5× (the 64th percentile of its own range); the price is in Stage 4 — declining, 2 weeks in; the business cycle reads DEEP CYCLICAL / EARLY RECOVERY. Fundamentals-momentum score: 44/100 (mixed).
Data as of 1 July 2026 · every number traces to its Screener source column · not investment advice.
- Market cap
- ₹25,961 Cr
- P/E
- 13.5×
- ROE
- 14.2%
- vs own 10-yr valuation
- 64th pctile
- Book value / share
- ₹81.0
- EPS (TTM)
- ₹11.0
- 10-yr median P/E
- 9.1×
- Revenue (FY26)
- ₹88,667 Cr
- Profit after tax (FY26)
- ₹1,925 Cr
- Weinstein stage
- Stage 4 (2 weeks)
- Data as of
- 1 July 2026
Profits swing violently in this business — real losses in FY15 and FY20 and FY21. That is what “deep cyclical” means: the same company looks brilliant at the top of its cycle and broken at the bottom.net_profit
Where the clock stands now: earnings sit at 78% of their historical range, margins are mid-band, and the market pays mid-range (64th percentile). That reads as EARLY RECOVERY — the sweet spot of the pendulum — the improvement is visible but not yet fully priced.net_profit
3 of the 6 things we track are currently moving the right way — some things working, some not.
Where the levels actually stand: ROCE 18% — decent; real debt (1.08× equity); margins near the top of their band. Momentum says which way things are moving; these say where they are.
Read this number for what it is: it measures the DIRECTION of change, not the quality of the business. A mediocre business getting better scores high here; a great one having a soft quarter scores low. Profit, sales and margins count double.
The price went one way, the profits the other
Since Jul 2017, the stock is up 19% while earnings per share fell 11%. The difference is re-rating — investors paying more for the same rupee of profit.pricettm_eps
That works until it doesn’t: from here, earnings have to do the lifting, because the multiple has already done its part.
Today’s P/E of 13.5× is the middle of its own range against its own 10-year history (64th percentile) — neither a bargain nor a stretch, by its own standards.pe_ratio
Data: Price, EPS and valuation (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | Price (₹) | EPS (TTM) (₹) | P/E (×) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17 | 127 | – | 25.9 |
| Sep 17 | 136 | 13.9 | 9.8 |
| Nov 17 | 126 | 13.9 | 9.1 |
| Jan 18 | 129 | 14.0 | 9.2 |
| Mar 18 | 118 | 13.9 | 8.5 |
| Apr 18 | 107 | 13.9 | 7.7 |
| Jun 18 | 88.3 | – | 6.3 |
| Aug 18 | 81.0 | 11.6 | 7.0 |
| Oct 18 | 83.0 | 11.5 | 7.2 |
| Dec 18 | 71.2 | 11.5 | 6.2 |
| Feb 19 | 67.5 | 11.6 | 5.8 |
| Mar 19 | 74.3 | – | 6.4 |
| May 19 | 63.0 | – | 5.5 |
| Jul 19 | 58.0 | 2.0 | 28.8 |
| Sep 19 | 51.6 | – | 25.7 |
| Nov 19 | 48.8 | – | – |
| Jan 20 | 44.0 | – | – |
| Feb 20 | 38.0 | – | – |
| Apr 20 | 32.4 | – | – |
| Jun 20 | 32.1 | – | – |
| Aug 20 | 33.4 | – | – |
| Oct 20 | 26.4 | – | – |
| Dec 20 | 32.9 | – | – |
| Jan 21 | 35.9 | -15.5 | – |
| Mar 21 | 38.7 | – | – |
| May 21 | 51.7 | – | – |
| Jul 21 | 47.8 | – | – |
| Sep 21 | 43.0 | – | – |
| Nov 21 | 49.8 | – | – |
| Dec 21 | 43.1 | – | – |
| Feb 22 | 39.5 | – | 31.6 |
| Apr 22 | 69.8 | – | 55.8 |
| Jun 22 | 94.6 | 17.2 | 5.5 |
| Aug 22 | 75.2 | – | 2.2 |
| Oct 22 | 60.8 | – | 1.8 |
| Dec 22 | 59.3 | – | 2.3 |
| Jan 23 | 57.9 | 21.5 | 2.2 |
| Mar 23 | 52.6 | – | 2.4 |
| May 23 | 65.0 | – | 4.3 |
| Jul 23 | 87.0 | – | 5.8 |
| Sep 23 | 94.8 | – | 17.4 |
| Nov 23 | 110 | 21.6 | 5.1 |
| Dec 23 | 133 | 21.5 | 6.2 |
| Feb 24 | 246 | 25.1 | 9.8 |
| Apr 24 | 227 | – | 9.1 |
| Jun 24 | 215 | – | 10.5 |
| Aug 24 | 205 | 15.2 | 13.5 |
| Oct 24 | 179 | – | 11.8 |
| Nov 24 | 155 | – | 29.7 |
| Jan 25 | 134 | 4.7 | 28.2 |
| Mar 25 | 136 | – | 28.6 |
| May 25 | 138 | – | – |
| Jul 25 | 142 | – | – |
| Sep 25 | 127 | – | – |
| Oct 25 | 166 | 5.9 | 28.2 |
| Dec 25 | 145 | – | 24.5 |
| Feb 26 | 193 | 12.5 | 15.5 |
| Apr 26 | 179 | 12.5 | 14.4 |
| May 26 | 149 | 11.0 | 13.6 |
| Jun 26 | 156 | 11.0 | 14.2 |
| Jul 26 | 148 | 11.0 | 13.5 |
Price is the weekly close (₹). EPS is trailing-twelve-month profit per share, anchored on Screener's own snapshots (the window starts at the first stable snapshot — earlier IPO-era share-count revisions are excluded, since they are not earnings events); between snapshots it is filled from price ÷ P/E (an exact identity), and any fill straying more than 18% from the neighbouring snapshots is dropped rather than shown. The lower panel is the P/E — what the market pays per rupee of profit; the dotted line is its long-run median (9.1×).
The price is in a downtrend — fighting it is expensive
STAGE 4 · DECLINING · 2 WEEKSPrice trends have a life cycle: they base (1), advance (2), top out (3) and decline (4). This chart is in Stage 4: declining — 2 weeks so far, confirmed.stage
The price is below its falling 200-day average — history says most of the damage in stocks happens here. Cheap can get cheaper in Stage 4.dma_200
Trailing NIFTY 500 for 4 weeks — relative strength is the market’s live opinion, and right now it is against it.rs_mansfield
What would end it: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the house exit rule — mechanical, no debates.dma_200
Data: Weekly price, moving averages and stage (sampled — full series in the embedded dataset)
| Period | Price (₹) | 200-DMA (₹) | 50-DMA (₹) | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16 | 55.0 | 62.0 | 61.2 | 4 |
| May 16 | 64.7 | 63.5 | 66.3 | 2 |
| Aug 16 | 74.8 | 67.3 | 73.8 | 2 |
| Nov 16 | 89.0 | 75.7 | 87.2 | 2 |
| Jan 17 | 100 | 85.5 | 99.5 | 2 |
| Apr 17 | 124 | 95.1 | 109 | 2 |
| Jul 17 | 125 | 109 | 124 | 2 |
| Oct 17 | 127 | 118 | 129 | 2 |
| Dec 17 | 129 | 122 | 126 | 2 |
| Mar 18 | 110 | 122 | 119 | 4 |
| Jun 18 | 89.0 | 113 | 102 | 4 |
| Sep 18 | 77.8 | 99.1 | 82.7 | 4 |
| Nov 18 | 73.9 | 90.2 | 78.7 | 4 |
| Feb 19 | 63.0 | 80.8 | 68.5 | 4 |
| May 19 | 62.3 | 76.2 | 68.8 | 4 |
| Aug 19 | 52.3 | 68.4 | 58.4 | 4 |
| Nov 19 | 53.5 | 60.5 | 50.9 | 4 |
| Jan 20 | 47.0 | 53.9 | 45.6 | 4 |
| Apr 20 | 33.3 | 45.7 | 33.0 | 4 |
| Jul 20 | 36.5 | 40.0 | 33.9 | 4 |
| Oct 20 | 26.4 | 36.4 | 30.8 | 4 |
| Dec 20 | 34.1 | 33.7 | 31.6 | 4 |
| Mar 21 | 40.9 | 35.9 | 38.7 | 2 |
| Jun 21 | 51.4 | 39.7 | 46.3 | 2 |
| Sep 21 | 43.6 | 42.5 | 44.8 | 2 |
| Nov 21 | 45.6 | 45.0 | 48.0 | 2 |
| Feb 22 | 42.7 | 44.8 | 45.0 | 1 |
| May 22 | 67.8 | 48.9 | 58.5 | 2 |
| Aug 22 | 71.9 | 63.8 | 76.6 | 2 |
| Oct 22 | 56.6 | 64.4 | 64.0 | 2 |
| Jan 23 | 58.0 | 61.1 | 58.0 | 4 |
| Apr 23 | 53.3 | 58.2 | 54.5 | 4 |
| Jul 23 | 87.7 | 62.6 | 70.3 | 2 |
| Sep 23 | 95.6 | 74.7 | 89.8 | 2 |
| Dec 23 | 130 | 92.1 | 117 | 2 |
| Mar 24 | 216 | 138 | 202 | 2 |
| Jun 24 | 205 | 173 | 215 | 2 |
| Aug 24 | 207 | 192 | 213 | 2 |
| Nov 24 | 157 | 182 | 167 | 4 |
| Feb 25 | 111 | 162 | 136 | 4 |
| May 25 | 125 | 148 | 131 | 4 |
| Aug 25 | 124 | 145 | 140 | 4 |
| Oct 25 | 145 | 140 | 137 | 4 |
| Jan 26 | 151 | 147 | 151 | 2 |
| Apr 26 | 175 | 163 | 181 | 2 |
| Jun 26 | 161 | 162 | 162 | 2 |
| Jul 26 | 148 | 161 | 160 | 4 |
Out of the loss years — profitable again, still below its best
Over 12 years, sales went from ₹71,552 Cr to ₹88,667 Cr (about 2% a year), and profit from ₹606 Cr to ₹1,925 Cr.revenuenet_profit
The books show real losses in FY15 and FY20 and FY21 (worst: ₹−4,043 Cr). Everything about today’s cheap-looking numbers must be read against that history — the recovery is what you are buying.net_profit
Data: Revenue by year
| Period | Revenue (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 71,552 |
| FY15 | 57,398 |
| FY16 | 39,730 |
| FY17 | 43,767 |
| FY18 | 49,055 |
| FY19 | 63,446 |
| FY20 | 50,230 |
| FY21 | 31,959 |
| FY22 | 69,758 |
| FY23 | 1,09,026 |
| FY24 | 90,407 |
| FY25 | 94,682 |
| FY26 | 88,667 |
Data: Profit by year
| Period | Profit after tax (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 606 |
| FY15 | -1,853 |
| FY16 | 506 |
| FY17 | 3,293 |
| FY18 | 1,774 |
| FY19 | 351 |
| FY20 | -4,043 |
| FY21 | -765 |
| FY22 | 2,958 |
| FY23 | 2,655 |
| FY24 | 3,597 |
| FY25 | 56 |
| FY26 | 1,925 |
Data: OPM % by year
| Period | OPM % (%) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 1.4 |
| FY15 | -3.8 |
| FY16 | 4.3 |
| FY17 | 11.4 |
| FY18 | 9.2 |
| FY19 | 4.1 |
| FY20 | -6.2 |
| FY21 | 2.2 |
| FY22 | 7.1 |
| FY23 | 6.0 |
| FY24 | 8.7 |
| FY25 | 2.4 |
| FY26 | 7.0 |
Sales have gone quiet — growth has stalled
Mar 26 sales were ₹23,950 Cr, down 3% on the same quarter last year.revenue
A shrinking topline puts the burden of the story on margins and one-offs — watch whether this is a pause or a slide.
Data: Quarterly sales
| Period | Revenue (₹ Cr) | YoY growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 21,058 | – |
| Sep 23 | 19,353 | – |
| Dec 23 | 24,667 | – |
| Mar 24 | 25,329 | – |
| Jun 24 | 23,247 | 10.4 |
| Sep 24 | 24,968 | 29.0 |
| Dec 24 | 21,871 | -11.3 |
| Mar 25 | 24,596 | -2.9 |
| Jun 25 | 17,356 | -25.3 |
| Sep 25 | 22,649 | -9.3 |
| Dec 25 | 24,712 | 13.0 |
| Mar 26 | 23,950 | -2.6 |
Margins are widening — 5% → 7% in a year
Of every ₹100 of sales, the company keeps ₹7.4 as operating profit (a year ago it kept ₹4.6).opm_pct
Zoom out and this is the page's quiet hero: annual operating margin bottomed at 2.2% in FY21 and has been rebuilt to 7.0% — that recovery, not sales alone, is what powers the profit growth elsewhere on this page.operating_profit
The gross margin moved the same way (8% → 14%), so this is about input costs and pricing power — the raw-material equation improved.gpm_pctopm_pct
Data: Three margins, quarterly
| Period | Gross (%) | Operating (%) | Net (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 12.6 | 9.8 | 4.8 |
| Sep 23 | 17.0 | 11.1 | 5.4 |
| Dec 23 | 6.0 | 4.7 | 1.6 |
| Mar 24 | 12.9 | 9.2 | 4.5 |
| Jun 24 | 5.9 | 2.6 | 0.3 |
| Sep 24 | 1.1 | -1.9 | -2.8 |
| Dec 24 | 8.6 | 4.7 | 1.4 |
| Mar 25 | 7.9 | 4.6 | 1.5 |
| Jun 25 | 5.6 | 1.0 | -1.6 |
| Sep 25 | 11.4 | 6.6 | 2.8 |
| Dec 25 | 14.8 | 11.3 | 5.9 |
| Mar 26 | 14.2 | 7.4 | 0.5 |
Profit collapsed 69% — mostly from keeping more of each sale
Mar 26 profit after tax was ₹117 Cr, down 69% year on year.net_profit
Data: Quarterly profit after tax
| Period | PAT (₹ Cr) | YoY growth (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 1,015 | – |
| Sep 23 | 1,052 | – |
| Dec 23 | 392 | – |
| Mar 24 | 1,138 | – |
| Jun 24 | 73.0 | -92.8 |
| Sep 24 | -697 | -166.3 |
| Dec 24 | 309 | -21.2 |
| Mar 25 | 371 | -67.4 |
| Jun 25 | -271 | -471.2 |
| Sep 25 | 627 | 190.0 |
| Dec 25 | 1,451 | 369.6 |
| Mar 26 | 117 | -68.5 |
The single biggest driver was the tax line.
Data: Where the profit change came from (Mar 25 → Mar 26)
| Component | Effect (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| PAT Mar 25 | 371 |
| More sales | −30 |
| Fatter margins | +681 |
| Other income | +14 |
| Depreciation | −57 |
| Interest | +33 |
| Tax | −895 |
| PAT Mar 26 | 117 |
The profits are real — they turn into cash
Over the last 5 profitable years, the business reported ₹11,191 Cr of profit and collected ₹22,320 Cr of operating cash — about 199% conversion.operating_cash_flownet_profit
One asterisk on that strength: suppliers are being paid 28 days later than a year ago (24 → 52 days). Cash flattered by stretching payables is real cash — but it is borrowed timing, not extra earning power.payable_days
Data: Cash collected vs profit reported (annual)
| Period | Operating cash flow (₹ Cr) | Profit after tax (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|
| FY14 | 8,597 | 606 |
| FY15 | -731 | -1,853 |
| FY16 | 1,429 | 506 |
| FY17 | -1,108 | 3,293 |
| FY18 | 3,972 | 1,774 |
| FY19 | 1,640 | 351 |
| FY20 | 289 | -4,043 |
| FY21 | -2,818 | -765 |
| FY22 | 4,496 | 2,958 |
| FY23 | 6,364 | 2,655 |
| FY24 | 7,051 | 3,597 |
| FY25 | 1,878 | 56.0 |
| FY26 | 2,531 | 1,925 |
The cash cycle is stretching — more money stuck in the pipeline
One rupee now takes about 41 days to go out the door as materials and come back as collected cash — up from 21 days the year before.cash_conversion_cycle
The biggest mover: inventory sitting longer in the warehouse (32 → 67 days).inventory_days
Data: Days of cash locked up (annual)
| Period | Customers owe (debtor days) (days) | Stock on shelf (inventory days) (days) | We owe suppliers (payable days) (days) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY14 | 23.0 | 44.0 | 110 |
| FY15 | 14.0 | 24.0 | 116 |
| FY16 | 19.0 | 36.0 | 223 |
| FY17 | 22.0 | 44.0 | 60.0 |
| FY18 | 19.0 | 45.0 | 41.0 |
| FY19 | 14.0 | 39.0 | 29.0 |
| FY20 | 7.0 | 30.0 | 24.0 |
| FY21 | 28.0 | 90.0 | 50.0 |
| FY22 | 23.0 | 62.0 | 55.0 |
| FY23 | 15.0 | 25.0 | 23.0 |
| FY24 | 16.0 | 38.0 | 33.0 |
| FY25 | 14.0 | 32.0 | 24.0 |
| FY26 | 25.0 | 67.0 | 52.0 |
The asset base keeps compounding — this company builds
The productive asset base has gone from ₹5,995 Cr (FY14) to ₹20,520 Cr, with another ₹826 Cr of capacity under construction right now.fixed_assetscwip
The build is self-funded: the last 3 years' investing outflow (₹3,842 Cr) fits inside the operating cash the business generated (₹11,460 Cr).investing_cash_flowoperating_cash_flow
Data: Assets in place vs under construction (annual)
| Period | Fixed assets (₹ Cr) | Under construction (CWIP) (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|---|
| FY14 | 5,995 | 8,552 |
| FY15 | 21,641 | 1,389 |
| FY16 | 21,747 | 198 |
| FY17 | 20,618 | 220 |
| FY18 | 20,217 | 682 |
| FY19 | 20,002 | 995 |
| FY20 | 20,431 | 1,746 |
| FY21 | 19,596 | 2,343 |
| FY22 | 21,384 | 170 |
| FY23 | 20,396 | 475 |
| FY24 | 20,410 | 744 |
| FY25 | 20,095 | 729 |
| FY26 | 20,520 | 826 |
Carrying real debt
For every ₹100 shareholders have put in (and left in), the company has borrowed ₹108 — total borrowings have grown from ₹9,840 Cr to ₹15,341 Cr over the window.borrowings
Data: Total borrowings (annual)
| Period | Borrowings (₹ Cr) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 9,840 |
| FY15 | 14,702 |
| FY16 | 14,395 |
| FY17 | 15,477 |
| FY18 | 14,921 |
| FY19 | 15,618 |
| FY20 | 18,482 |
| FY21 | 24,062 |
| FY22 | 21,310 |
| FY23 | 16,939 |
| FY24 | 12,687 |
| FY25 | 13,143 |
| FY26 | 15,341 |
Data: Debt vs shareholders’ money (annual)
| Period | Debt ÷ equity (x) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 1.4 |
| FY15 | 2.8 |
| FY16 | 2.4 |
| FY17 | 1.6 |
| FY18 | 1.5 |
| FY19 | 1.6 |
| FY20 | 2.9 |
| FY21 | 5.7 |
| FY22 | 3.0 |
| FY23 | 1.7 |
| FY24 | 1.0 |
| FY25 | 1.0 |
| FY26 | 1.1 |
Every ₹100 kept in the business earns ₹18 — decent, not special
Return on capital employed is 18.0% (a year ago: 4.0%). This is the single best test of business quality: what the company earns on the money it keeps.roce_pct
Rising returns on capital while growing is the rarest combination in investing — it means the new projects earn more than the old ones.roce_pct
Data: Returns on capital (annual)
| Period | ROCE (%) |
|---|---|
| FY14 | 4.0 |
| FY15 | -10.0 |
| FY16 | 7.0 |
| FY17 | 19.0 |
| FY18 | 15.0 |
| FY19 | 7.0 |
| FY20 | -16.0 |
| FY21 | -1.0 |
| FY22 | 14.0 |
| FY23 | 20.0 |
| FY24 | 26.0 |
| FY25 | 4.0 |
| FY26 | 18.0 |
The owners aren’t moving
Promoters hold 88.6%, essentially unchanged. Foreign funds own 3.4%, domestic funds 0.3%.promoters_pctfiis_pctdiis_pct
Data: Who holds the shares, quarterly
| Period | Promoters (%) | Foreign funds (%) | Domestic funds (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 | 88.6 | 1.1 | 0.7 |
| Sep 23 | 88.6 | 1.5 | 1.1 |
| Dec 23 | 88.6 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Mar 24 | 88.6 | 2.7 | 1.5 |
| Jun 24 | 88.6 | 2.3 | 1.5 |
| Sep 24 | 88.6 | 1.7 | 1.5 |
| Dec 24 | 88.6 | 1.4 | 1.7 |
| Mar 25 | 88.6 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Jun 25 | 88.6 | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| Sep 25 | 88.6 | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| Dec 25 | 88.6 | 2.1 | 1.1 |
| Mar 26 | 88.6 | 3.4 | 0.3 |
- Promoters are not selling. Their stake has moved 0.1 points or less in 8 quarters — it sits at 88.6%.promoters_pct
- Sales are NOT driving the profit move — revenue grew just −2.6% while profit moved much more. This is a margin-and-recovery story, which has a shorter runway than a volume story.revenuenet_profit
A turnaround that stuck — the question is what’s left to re-rate
The numbers are genuinely mixed, and the price already assumes the good news continues.
Best thing in the data: returns on capital rising (4.0% → 18.0%).roce_pct
Biggest worry: profit falling (₹371 Cr → ₹117 Cr).net_profit
Machine-written research from Screener data — every number traces to its source column. Sector Alpha is not a SEBI-registered investment adviser; nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell. Not investment advice.
Straight answers from the data
What does Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd do?
Mangalore Refinery & Petrochemicals Limited (MRPL) was set up as a joint venture (JV) between the AV Birla Group and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL). It is now a subsidiary of Oil & Natural Gas Corporation(ONGC). The company is mainly engaged in the business of refining crude oil, petrochemical business, trading of aviation fuels and distribution of petroleum products through retail outlets and transport terminals. [1][2]. It is listed in the Refineries sector with a market capitalisation of ₹25,961 Cr.
What is Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd's share price?
As of 1 July 2026, Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd trades at ₹148, down 1.8% over the past year, with a market capitalisation of ₹25,961 Cr. Trailing NIFTY 500 for 4 weeks. Prices are weekly closes from Screener data; this page refreshes with each weekly update.
What is Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd's share price target?
Sector Alpha does not publish broker-style price targets. Our discounted-cash-flow model estimates Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd's intrinsic value at ₹340 per share under base assumptions (bear ₹139, bull ₹340), against the current price of ₹148 — a 107% margin of safety. The current price already implies roughly 7% annual earnings growth. These are model estimates, not forecasts — treat them as one input alongside the valuation history below, not as a target.
Is Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd stock overvalued or undervalued?
Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd trades at a P/E of 13.5× — the 64th percentile of its own 8.9-year trading range (median 9.1×), which is above the middle of its own historical range. The price went one way, the profits the other. Since Jul 2017, the stock is up 19% while earnings per share fell 11%. The difference is re-rating — investors paying more for the same rupee of profit.
What did Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd report in its latest quarterly results?
In its most recent reported quarter (Q4 FY26, quarter ended March 2026): Mar 26 sales were ₹23,950 Cr, down 3% on the same quarter last year. Mar 26 profit after tax was ₹117 Cr, down 69% year on year. Figures are from Screener-scraped quarterly filings; the page updates when the next quarter is filed.
Is Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd growing?
Sales have gone quiet — growth has stalled. Mar 26 sales were ₹23,950 Cr, down 3% on the same quarter last year.
Are Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd's profits growing?
Profit collapsed 69% — mostly from keeping more of each sale. Mar 26 profit after tax was ₹117 Cr, down 69% year on year.
What are Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd's operating margins?
Margins are widening — 5% → 7% in a year. In the most recent quarter, of every ₹100 of sales, the company keeps ₹7.4 as operating profit (a year ago it kept ₹4.6).
What is Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd's long-term growth record?
Revenue grew from ₹71,552 Cr in FY14 to ₹88,667 Cr in FY26 — a 1.8% compound annual growth rate over 12 years. Profit after tax compounded at 10.1% over the same period (₹606 Cr → ₹1,925 Cr).
Is Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd stock in an uptrend?
The price is in a downtrend — fighting it is expensive. Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd is in Stage 4 — declining, 2 weeks in (confirmed). Stages follow Stan Weinstein's four-phase read of weekly price against the 200-day average: basing (1), advancing (2), topping (3), declining (4).
Why is Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd stock falling?
The price is down 2% over the past year and the chart is in Weinstein Stage 4 (declining) — trading below its 200-day average, with the P/E at the 64th percentile of its own range. Since Jul 2017, the stock is up 19% while earnings per share fell 11%. The difference is re-rating — investors paying more for the same rupee of profit.
Is Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd beating the NIFTY 500?
No — trailing NIFTY 500 for 4 weeks, as of 1 July 2026. Relative strength is measured weekly against the NIFTY 500 (Mansfield RS): a positive reading means the stock has outperformed the index over the trailing window, week after week.
Where is Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd in its business cycle?
The data reads Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd as a deep cyclical business currently in its early recovery phase — earnings at 78% of their own historical range, valuation at the 64th percentile. Profits swing violently in this business — real losses in FY15 and FY20 and FY21. That is what “deep cyclical” means: the same company looks brilliant at the top of its cycle and broken at the bottom.
Who owns Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd — what is the promoter holding?
Promoters hold 88.6%, essentially unchanged. Foreign funds own 3.4%, domestic funds 0.3%. Shareholding is from Screener's quarterly filings data.
Does Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd have too much debt?
Carrying real debt. For every ₹100 shareholders have put in (and left in), the company has borrowed ₹108 — total borrowings have grown from ₹9,840 Cr to ₹15,341 Cr over the window.
What is the bull case for Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd?
From losses in FY15 and FY20 and FY21 to record profits — the comeback is real, the price knows it. Best thing in the data: returns on capital rising (4.0% → 18.0%). Sales have gone quiet — growth has stalled.
What is the bear case for Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd — what could break the story?
Biggest worry: profit falling (₹371 Cr → ₹117 Cr). Two quarters of margins reversing would kill this story. The nearest-term thing to watch: two consecutive quarters of margin decline would break this trend. This falsification condition is stated up front so the thesis can be checked against incoming quarters, not defended after the fact.
Is Mangalore Refinery And Petrochemicals Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
Sector Alpha does not publish buy or sell recommendations — this is a research read, not advice. What the data says: a turnaround that stuck — the question is what’s left to re-rate. The numbers are genuinely mixed, and the price already assumes the good news continues. Across the 7-model scorecard the composite research signal is on watch at 48% confidence. This is machine-written research compiled from Screener data — every number traces to its source — and it is not investment advice. Do your own diligence.