Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd
INDSWFTLABInd-Swift Laboratories Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. +199.9% in a year against EPS −88.5% — the market is paying now for delivery later.
The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −36% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (27 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 99th percentile of its own 8-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +177.8% year on year, and −36% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the cash starts following the profit.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd trades at ₹304, in a confirmed uptrend and 27 weeks into that stage. That is +89.1% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 100% of a 52-week range of ₹90 to ₹304. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 18 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 27 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹304 it trades +89.1% versus its 200-day average and sits at 100% of its 52-week range (₹90–₹304).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +747% while the NIFTY 500 moved +284% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 18 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd trades at 40.6× P/E, about the priciest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 16.0×, measured across 7.9 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 40.6× is about the priciest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 16.0× measured over 7.9 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −88.5% against a +199.9% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +31.4%/yr price move, ~+32.4%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−1.0 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Stage: Deteriorating Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd reads as deteriorating on its fundamental arc. Deteriorating — profit and EPS growth are shrinking (profit growth −74.3% latest against +1039.5% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE holding at 5.0%. The read is built from 8 quarters across 4 curves, on partial evidence.
🚨 Why it matters: falling curves mean every cheap-looking ratio below needs a discount for direction.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +14.1% | −19.0% | −6.4% | −0.2% |
| Profit | −83.6% | −5.1% | — | — |
| EPS | −88.5% | −16.0% | — | — |
| Share price | +199.9% | +48.3% | +31.4% | +23.6% |
4-Factor Sector Score
55.4/100 — rank 4 of 14 in Pharma - API · 87% evidence confidence
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd scores 55.4 out of 100 against the 14 companies it is compared with in Pharma - API, ranking 4. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 23.1 + 6 + 6.3 + 20 = 55.4. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd reported ₹191 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +24.8% year on year. That is the 5th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at −0.2% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹641 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹665 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹641 Cr (+14.1% on the year), capping 10 years at −0.2% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹191 Cr, +24.8% year on year — the 5th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +310.0% growth against the decade's −0.2% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +53.9% over the last 4 quarters against −23.6%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating; TTM profit −74.3% vs −67.4%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's operating margin is 17.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +14.6 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −3.5% to 21.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 17.0%, +14.6 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −3.5%–21.0%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +15.1 pp year on year while gross margin went +7.0 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd earned ₹25.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +177.8% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹41.0 Cr. That is 13.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹9.0 Cr. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Jun 26 profit was ₹25.0 Cr, +177.8% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹41.0 Cr (−83.6%).
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years −36% of Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹−70.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹41.0 Cr of profit. After ₹74.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−144 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹−70.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹41.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−144 Cr after ₹74.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is −36% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
🚨 Why conversion sits at −36%: the cash cycle tightened 251 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 116 days in FY26, down from 367 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹−171 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹641 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹1.8 Cr, so roughly ₹204 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 113 days, inventory at 191 days — roughly 6.3 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 116 days, tighter than FY21's 367.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 191 days to sell; customers pay about 113 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 188 days — netting out to the 116-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹641 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹1.8 Cr — so the 116-day loop keeps roughly ₹204 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹−171 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹108 Cr of depreciation — spending at or below maintenance level. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹10.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd earns a ROCE of 5% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 0% in FY14. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −8.8 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 6.4% net margin on 0.38× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 5%, recovered from a FY14 trough of 0% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 6.4% net margin × 0.38× asset turns × 1.21× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 2.9% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 3.2% − 12.0% = a −8.8 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd carries total debt of ₹21.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,384 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.02 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 1.59 in FY22 to 0.02 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Mar 26: total debt of ₹21.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,384 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.02. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 1.59 (FY22) to 0.02 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Foreign institutions added 10.0 points of Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 10.7% of the company. Promoters moved +0.9 points over the same window, to 42.9%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: +10.0 points over 8 quarters to 10.7%; Promoters: +0.9 points over 8 quarters to 42.9%; Domestic institutions: −0.8 points over 8 quarters to 0.2%.
Why the register moved: foreign institutions drove it (+10.0 points), alongside promoters (+0.9 points) — steady accumulation by institutions reading the same numbers this page reads.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Senores Pharmaceuticals LtdSENORES | 73.2/100Favorable setup75% evidence | LEADER | 32.4/35 Revenue 50.9% · PAT 92.7% · OPM change 5 pp 95% evidence | 17.0/25 ROCE 15.1% · OPM 30% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 53.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.4/20 RS sector 26.6% · RS bench 57.6% · 1Y 126.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 32.4 + 17 + 9.4 + 14.4 = 73.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence. | ||||||
| 2Wanbury LtdWANBURY | 65.1/100Favorable setup81% evidence | FADING | 19.9/35 Revenue 3.6% · PAT 30% · OPM change -5.2 pp 95% evidence | 18.6/25 ROCE 30.8% · OPM 9.8% 95% evidence | 14.3/20 P/E 15.4× · PEG — 50% evidence | 12.3/20 RS sector 5.3% · RS bench 0% · 1Y 2.7%6 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.9 + 18.6 + 14.3 + 12.3 = 65.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Innova Captab LtdINNOVACAP | 57.0/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence | LEADER | 24.8/35 Revenue 34.4% · PAT 18.5% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 13.2/25 ROCE 15% · OPM 16% 100% evidence | 6.6/20 P/E 38.5× · PEG 4.06 100% evidence | 12.4/20 RS sector 0.7% · RS bench 26.4% · 1Y 13%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.8 + 13.2 + 6.6 + 12.4 = 57 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltdthis pageINDSWFTLAB | 55.4/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.1/35 Revenue 53.9% · PAT -74.3% · OPM change 14.6 pp 95% evidence | 6.0/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 17% 95% evidence | 6.3/20 P/E 40.6× · PEG — 50% evidence | 20.0/20 RS sector 74.8% · RS bench 116.5% · 1Y 206.8%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 6 + 6.3 + 20 = 55.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 5Jagsonpal Pharmaceuticals LtdJAGSNPHARM | 53.1/100Mixed-positive evidence87% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 15.7/35 Revenue 3.2% · PAT -24.6% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence | 18.9/25 ROCE 22.7% · OPM 21% 95% evidence | 10.7/20 P/E 31.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 7.8/20 RS sector -14.7% · RS bench 7.6% · 1Y -11.3%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.7 + 18.9 + 10.7 + 7.8 = 53.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Aarti Drugs LtdAARTIDRUGS | 47.5/100Mixed-negative evidence100% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.7/35 Revenue 10.5% · PAT 1.1% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 12.0/25 ROCE 11.9% · OPM 14% 100% evidence | 12.3/20 P/E 19.7× · PEG 2.4 100% evidence | 5.5/20 RS sector -21.6% · RS bench -0.6% · 1Y -15.3%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.7 + 12 + 12.3 + 5.5 = 47.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 7Beta Drugs LtdBETA | 46.8/100Mixed-negative evidence76% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 11.6/35 Revenue -11.3% · PAT -14.8% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence | 18.4/25 ROCE 19.2% · OPM 22% 76% evidence | 7.1/20 P/E 62× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.7/20 RS sector -17.9% · RS bench 51.5% · 1Y 47.6%10 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.6 + 18.4 + 7.1 + 9.7 = 46.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Fermenta Biotech LtdFERMENTA | 45.2/100Mixed-negative evidence74% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 5.0/35 Revenue -3.1% · PAT -44% · OPM change -5.9 pp 95% evidence | 14.3/25 ROCE 20.6% · OPM 14.8% 95% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 24.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.1/20 RS sector 15.7% · RS bench 30.9% · 1Y 32.4%5 of 7 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 5 + 14.3 + 10.8 + 15.1 = 45.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 30.9%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 9Anuh Pharma LtdANUHPHR | 43.3/100Mixed-negative evidence87% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.5/35 Revenue 9.7% · PAT -2.2% · OPM change 2 pp 95% evidence | 12.9/25 ROCE 14.9% · OPM 8% 95% evidence | 12.6/20 P/E 17.3× · PEG — 50% evidence | 1.3/20 RS sector -26.4% · RS bench -6.5% · 1Y -16.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.5 + 12.9 + 12.6 + 1.3 = 43.3 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Gujarat Themis Biosyn LtdGUJTHEM | 42.6/100Mixed-negative evidence93% evidence | ASLEEP | 20.1/35 Revenue 16.1% · PAT 6.7% · OPM change 9 pp 100% evidence | 15.6/25 ROCE 14.8% · OPM 48% 100% evidence | 6.9/20 P/E 78× · PEG 2.55 65% evidence | 0.0/20 RS sector -27.2% · RS bench -7.8% · 1Y 2.2%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.1 + 15.6 + 6.9 + 0 = 42.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11Kopran LtdKOPRAN | 41.4/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 14.5/35 Revenue 12% · PAT -28.4% · OPM change -0.2 pp 95% evidence | 9.6/25 ROCE 6.7% · OPM 10.3% 95% evidence | 8.1/20 P/E 36.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 9.2/20 RS sector -17.6% · RS bench 17.6% · 1Y 21.1%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.5 + 9.6 + 8.1 + 9.2 = 41.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 12Orchid Pharma LtdORCHPHARMA | 36.7/100Mixed-negative evidence85% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 17.4/35 Revenue 14.1% · PAT -80% · OPM change 6.8 pp 74% evidence | 1.8/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 4.6% 100% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 552× · PEG 1.77 100% evidence | 9.0/20 RS sector -19.8% · RS bench 35.1% · 1Y 38.5%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.4 + 1.8 + 8.5 + 9 = 36.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 13Aarti Pharmalabs LtdAARTIPHARM | 35.1/100Mixed-negative evidence94% evidence | TURNING | 10.2/35 Revenue 1.2% · PAT -20.2% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence | 11.8/25 ROCE 10.7% · OPM 25% 100% evidence | 3.3/20 P/E 35.9× · PEG 5.52 100% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector -10.7% · RS bench 12.3% · 1Y 0.6%1 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 10.2 + 11.8 + 3.3 + 9.8 = 35.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 14Themis Medicare LtdTHEMISMED | 22.6/100Adverse evidence72% evidence | FADING | 6.1/35 Revenue -12.9% · PAT 100% · OPM change -50 pp 71% evidence | 2.5/25 ROCE 2.7% · OPM -60% 95% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 939.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.5/20 RS sector -20.6% · RS bench 0.1% · 1Y -6.4%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 6.1 + 2.5 + 8.5 + 5.5 = 22.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's share price today?
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd trades at ₹304, +199.9% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹2,645 Cr. The stock sits at the very top of its 52-week range (₹90–₹304), +89.1% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 27 weeks in. — as of 14 August 2026.
What were Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd reported revenue of ₹191 Cr and net profit of ₹25.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 24.8% and profit rose 177.8% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹2.84. The operating margin was 17.0%, 14.6 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's revenue?
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd reported revenue of ₹191 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +24.8% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹641 Cr (+14.1%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at −0.2% a year. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's profit?
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd earned ₹25.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +177.8% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹41.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 17.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's market cap?
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹2,645 Cr at a share price of ₹304. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's P/E ratio?
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd trades at a P/E of 40.6×, at the 99th percentile of its own 8-year range, against a long-run median of 16.0×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd pay a dividend?
No — Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd looks expensive: its P/E of 40.6× sits at the 99th percentile of its 8-year range (long-run median 16.0×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd growing?
Yes — Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +24.8% year on year, profit +177.8%, and the margin +14.6 pp at 17.0%. The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 14 August 2026.
How is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd performing?
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 27 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 24.8% and profit rose 177.8% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 18 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 14 August 2026.
What stage is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd in?
Deteriorating — profit and EPS growth are shrinking (profit growth −74.3% latest against +1039.5% at its 12-quarter best), ROCE holding at 5.0%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +53.9% latest, profit growth −74.3% latest, eps growth −81.9% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 27 of stage 2), trading +89.1% versus its 200-day average and at the very top of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 18 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.5 years the stock moved +747% against the NIFTY 500's +284% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 14 August 2026.
Will Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹304, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 27 weeks in. Its P/E of 40.6× sits at the 99th percentile of its own 8-year range. — as of 14 August 2026.
Who owns Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd?
Promoters hold 42.9% of Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd, foreign institutions 10.7%, domestic institutions 0.2% and the public 46.2% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Foreign institutions added 10.0 points over 8 quarters. — as of 14 August 2026.
Does Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd have too much debt?
No — Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.01, and operating profit covers the interest bill 45×. FY26 borrowings were ₹18.0 Cr against equity of ₹1,384 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's capex?
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd spent ₹−171 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹74.0 Cr, with ₹10.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 14 August 2026.
What is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's cash flow?
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd consumed ₹70.0 Cr of operating cash in FY26 — cash flowed out rather than in (free cash flow: ₹−144 Cr). Operating cash was negative while the company reported a profit of ₹41.0 Cr. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's profit real cash?
No — operating cash was negative over the last 3 fiscal years: Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd consumed cash while reporting profit. In FY26, operating cash was ₹−70.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹41.0 Cr. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 14 August 2026.
Where is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd in its business cycle?
Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 7.0%, against a 13-year band of −3.5%–21.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 17.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 14 August 2026.
What could break the Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −36% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 14 August 2026.
Is Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Ind-Swift Laboratories Ltd's price has outrun its earnings. +199.9% in a year against EPS −88.5% — the market is paying now for delivery later. The sharpest open question: whether the cash starts following the profit. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 14 August 2026.