Take Solutions Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Take Solutions Ltd trades at ₹43.6, in a confirmed uptrend and 29 weeks into that stage. That is +35.1% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 87% of a 52-week range of ₹7 to ₹49. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 45 straight weeks.

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 29 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹43.6 it trades +35.1% versus its 200-day average and sits at 87% of its 52-week range (₹7–₹49).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.2 years the stock moved −67% while the NIFTY 500 moved +277% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 45 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 100th percentile of its own range.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Take Solutions Ltd trades at 3,222.0× P/E, about the priciest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 13.4×, measured across 10.0 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 3,222.0× is about the priciest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 13.4× measured over 10.0 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Take Solutions Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 5 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

59.9/100 — rank 5 of 36 in Miscellaneous · 64% evidence confidence

Take Solutions Ltd scores 59.9 out of 100 against the 36 companies it is compared with in Miscellaneous, ranking 5. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 25 + 11.6 + 8.5 + 14.8 = 59.9. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Take Solutions Ltd reported ₹0.0 Cr of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹0.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹0.0 Cr. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.

Take Solutions Ltd reported ₹0.0 Cr of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹0.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹0.0 Cr. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.

FY25 revenue came in at ₹0.0 Cr (−100.0% on the year). The latest quarter (Dec 25) printed ₹0.0 Cr, null year on year.

→ Revenue slipped — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: the margin picture.

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

A clean operating margin is not in our numbers for Take Solutions Ltd — its accounts do not report the operating-profit line this section reads, which is common for lenders and holding companies. The sections above and below carry the readings this company's filings do support.

A clean operating margin is not in our numbers for Take Solutions Ltd — its accounts do not report the operating-profit line this section reads, which is common for lenders and holding companies. The sections above and below carry the readings this company's filings do support.

This company's accounts do not report the operating-profit line this section reads — common for lenders and holding companies classified outside the financial bucket. The revenue and net-profit sections are the cleaner reads for Take Solutions Ltd.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −2,839.1 pp year on year while gross margin went +47.9 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

→ Margins slipped — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit −97.7% in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Take Solutions Ltd earned ₹1.1 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, −97.7% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹37.5 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is −7.3%. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹47.7 Cr. 9 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Take Solutions Ltd earned ₹1.1 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, −97.7% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹37.5 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is −7.3%. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹47.7 Cr. 9 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Dec 25 profit was ₹1.1 Cr, −97.7% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed ₹37.5 Cr (null), and the 10-year compound rate is −7.3%.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 55% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 55% of Take Solutions Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY25 that was ₹−16.4 Cr of operating cash against ₹37.5 Cr of profit. After ₹−30.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹14.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of ₹−16.4 Cr against reported profit of ₹37.5 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹14.0 Cr after ₹−30.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 55% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

🚨 Why conversion sits at 55%: the cash cycle tightened 116 days between FY20 and FY25 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: a 0-day cycle and ₹−87.0 Cr of building.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Take Solutions Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 0 days in FY25, down from 116 days in FY20. Capital spending ran ₹−87.0 Cr over the last 3 years.

FY25: debtors at 0 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 0 days, tighter than FY20's 116.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹−87.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹18.0 Cr of depreciation — spending at or below maintenance level. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY25) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is 11% and the ROIC − WACC spread is −18.6 pp.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified

Take Solutions Ltd earns a ROCE of 11% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −22% in FY24. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −18.6 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −3,322.8% net margin on 0.04× asset turns.

FY25 ROCE is 11%, recovered from a FY24 trough of −22% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY24): −3,322.8% net margin × 0.04× asset turns × −9.92× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 1,318.5% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −6.6% − 12.0% = a −18.6 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 0.00.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified

Take Solutions Ltd's net worth is negative — it owes more than it owns — so a debt-to-equity ratio is not meaningful here. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.43 in FY22 to −4.11 in FY24. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Dec 24: total debt of ₹8.0 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹−14.0 Cr — a debt-to-equity of −0.57. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.43 (FY22) to −4.11 (FY24). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: Promoters cut 53.4 points over 8 quarters.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Promoters cut 53.4 points of Take Solutions Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 0.0% of the company. Foreign institutions moved +0.3 points over the same window, to 0.3%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Promoters: −53.4 points over 8 quarters to 0.0%; Foreign institutions: +0.3 points over 8 quarters to 0.3%; Domestic institutions: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 0.0%. Note the structure: promoters hold under 20% — this is a widely-held company where institutions, not a family, set the direction.

🚨 Why the register moved: promoters drove it (−53.4 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Take Solutions Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions