Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd trades at ₹271, in a downtrend and 26 weeks into that stage. That is +19.2% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 89% of a 52-week range of ₹172 to ₹283. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 9 straight weeks.

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 26 of stage 4. At ₹271 it trades +19.2% versus its 200-day average and sits at 89% of its 52-week range (₹172–₹283).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.1 years the stock moved +6% while the NIFTY 500 moved +0% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 9 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 49th percentile of its own range.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd trades at 104.0× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (49th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 104.4×, measured across 1.1 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 104.0× is mid-range by its own standards (49th percentile), against a long-run median of 104.4× measured over 1.1 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +37.9% against a −6.8% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

The PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 98% on reported income across 8 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 4 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

54.7/100 — rank 11 of 36 in Miscellaneous · 57% evidence confidence

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd scores 54.7 out of 100 against the 36 companies it is compared with in Miscellaneous, ranking 11. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 21.2 + 12.6 + 9.1 + 11.8 = 54.7. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd reported ₹243 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +22.1% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹923 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹834 Cr.

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd reported ₹243 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +22.1% year on year. That is the 4th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹923 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹834 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹923 Cr (+17.0% on the year). The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹243 Cr, +22.1% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

→ Revenue grew — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: 74.0% this quarter (+2.0 pp YoY).

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd's operating margin is 74.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, +2.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 4 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 65.0% to 74.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd's operating margin is 74.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, +2.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 4 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 65.0% to 74.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 74.0%, +2.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 4 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 65.0%–74.0%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +1.2 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

→ Margins held — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit +15.6% in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd earned ₹74.0 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +15.6% year on year. It is the 4th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹342 Cr. That is 30.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹64.0 Cr.

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd earned ₹74.0 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +15.6% year on year. It is the 4th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹342 Cr. That is 30.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹64.0 Cr.

Mar 26 profit was ₹74.0 Cr, +15.6% year on year — the 4th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹342 Cr (+52.0%).

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +22.1% and the margin +2.0 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +95.0% vs revenue +25.6%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 247% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 247% of Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹702 Cr of operating cash against ₹342 Cr of profit. After ₹1,855 Cr of capital spending, ₹−1,153 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹702 Cr against reported profit of ₹342 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−1,153 Cr after ₹1,855 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 247% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

Why conversion sits at 247%: the cash cycle held roughly steady between FY23 and FY26 — so conversion tracks profitability rather than the cycle.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 8.8× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: ₹4,148 Cr of building over 3 years.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 74 days in FY26, up from 72 days in FY23. Capital spending ran ₹4,148 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹923 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹2.5 Cr, so roughly ₹187 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 74 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 74 days, looser than FY23's 72.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹923 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹2.5 Cr — so the 74-day loop keeps roughly ₹187 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹4,148 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹470 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹210 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is 8%.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd earns a ROCE of 8% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 8% in FY23. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 37.1% net margin on 0.11× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 8%, recovered from a FY23 trough of 8% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 37.1% net margin × 0.11× asset turns × 1.96× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 8.0% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The quarterly return curves and the return-on-invested-capital overlay, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 98% on reported income across 8 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 0.87.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd carries ₹3,731 Cr of borrowings against ₹4,291 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.87. Operating profit covers the interest bill 6×. Over 4 years borrowings went from ₹98.0 Cr to ₹3,731 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹4,148 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY26: borrowings of ₹3,731 Cr against equity of ₹4,291 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.87. Operating profit covers the interest bill 6×. Over 4 years borrowings went from ₹98.0 Cr to ₹3,731 Cr while capital spending ran ₹4,148 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.

The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 98% on reported income across 8 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: the register is quiet.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

No holder of Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. Promoters moved +0.0 points over the same window, to 86.9%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −0.5 points over 4 quarters to 5.3%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 4 quarters to 86.9%; Domestic institutions: +0.0 points over 4 quarters to 5.3%.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd: the Z-score is withheld — it comes from the second data source this page could not reconcile, and a solvency score is not worth printing on a number two sources dispute. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is withheld — it comes from the second data source this page could not reconcile, and a solvency score is not worth printing on a number two sources dispute.

Frequently asked questions