Kyivstar Group Ltd.
KYIVKyivstar Group Ltd.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +32.2% in a year while annual EPS moved −58.4% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (15 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 61st percentile of its own 2-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +125.0% year on year, and 206% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Kyivstar Group Ltd. trades at $13.8, in a confirmed uptrend and 15 weeks into that stage. That is +6.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 66% of a 52-week range of $10 to $16. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (1 week and counting).
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 15 of stage 2. At $13.8 it trades +6.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 66% of its 52-week range ($10–$16).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.7 years the stock moved +38% while the S&P 500 moved +27% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-31) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Kyivstar Group Ltd. trades at 18.6× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (61st percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 16.5×, measured across 1.6 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 18.6× is mid-range by its own standards (61st percentile), against a long-run median of 16.5× measured over 1.6 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −58.4% against a +32.2% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.
Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Kyivstar Group Ltd. reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 6 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +26.1% | — | — | — |
| Profit | −57.1% | — | — | — |
| EPS | −58.4% | — | — | — |
| Stock price | +32.2% | — | — | — |
4-Factor Sector Score
53.6/100 — rank 5 of 21 in Telecom Services · 58% evidence confidence
Kyivstar Group Ltd. scores 53.6 out of 100 against the 21 companies it is compared with in Telecom Services, ranking 5. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 12.5 + 16.1 + 9.1 + 15.9 = 53.6. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Kyivstar Group Ltd. reported $0.3 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +23.1% year on year. That is the 5th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 2 years it has compounded at 12.3% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $1.2 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.2 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $1.2 B (+26.1% on the year), capping 2 years at 12.3% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.3 B, +23.1% year on year — the 5th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +23.2% growth against the decade's 12.3% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s operating margin is 34.4% in the Mar 26 quarter, −0.2 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 23.3% to 39.1%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 34.4%, −0.2 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 3 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 23.3%–39.1%.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −0.2 pp year on year while gross margin went +2.1 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Kyivstar Group Ltd. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +125.0% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.1 B. The 2-year compound rate is −34.5%. That is 28.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B. 1 of the last 9 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was $0.1 B, +125.0% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.1 B (−57.1%), and the 2-year compound rate is −34.5%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +23.1% and the margin −0.2 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −18.3% vs revenue +23.2%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 206% of Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $0.6 B of operating cash against $0.1 B of profit. After $0.3 B of capital spending, $0.3 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $0.6 B against reported profit of $0.1 B, leaving free cash of $0.3 B after $0.3 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 206% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Kyivstar Group Ltd. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $1.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 28.7% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $1.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Kyivstar Group Ltd. earns a ROE of 9% in FY25. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 10.3% net margin on 0.55× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 9%.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 10.3% net margin × 0.55× asset turns × 1.63× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 9.2% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
Dividend
Kyivstar Group Ltd. pays no dividend. Across the last 9 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.
Kyivstar Group Ltd. does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 9 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Kyivstar Group Ltd. carries total debt of $0.5 B against shareholder equity of $1.4 B as of Jun 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.39. On the annual view that ratio went from 1.01 in FY23 to 0.40 in FY25. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.
Jun 26: total debt of $0.5 B against shareholder equity of $1.4 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.39. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 1.01 (FY23) to 0.40 (FY25). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
5.9% of Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s tradable float is currently sold short — some money is positioned against it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 2.6 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
The latest reading: 5.9% of the float is sold short, and at typical trading volumes it would take about 2.6 days to buy those positions back. Some money is positioned against it. This is a single point-in-time reading — we do not yet hold its history, so we show no trend chart.
Why it sits there: who is doing the shorting, and why, does not travel with the number — the level is shown without inventing its story.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Kyivstar Group Ltd.: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BCE Inc.BCE | 59.1/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence | BASING | 23.4/35 Revenue 1.6% · PAT 100% · OPM change 3.3 pp 83% evidence | 12.0/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 20.7% 76% evidence | 15.7/20 P/E 5.2× · PEG 0.15 65% evidence | 8.0/20 RS sector -9.8% · RS bench -17.7% · 1Y -9.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.4 + 12 + 15.7 + 8 = 59.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Millicom International Cellular S.A.TIGO | 56.5/100Mixed-positive evidence71% evidence | LEADER | 15.8/35 Revenue 13.1% · PAT 17.3% · OPM change -8.3 pp 83% evidence | 13.0/25 ROCE 3.2% · OPM 21.5% 76% evidence | 9.9/20 P/E 10.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.8/20 RS sector 37.1% · RS bench 25.1% · 1Y 120.8%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.8 + 13 + 9.9 + 17.8 = 56.5 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 25.1%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 3VEON Ltd.VEON | 54.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 15.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.2 pp 45% evidence | 16.4/25 ROCE 5.9% · OPM 25.5% 76% evidence | 8.7/20 P/E 65.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector 1.6% · RS bench -7.2% · 1Y -3.3%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.4 + 16.4 + 8.7 + 13.9 = 54.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Verizon Communications Inc.VZ | 53.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 16.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.1 pp 45% evidence | 13.4/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 23.9% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 11× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.3/20 RS sector 3.5% · RS bench -5.7% · 1Y 8.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.3 + 13.4 + 9.8 + 14.3 = 53.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Kyivstar Group Ltd.this pageKYIV | 53.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | FADING | 12.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.9 pp 45% evidence | 16.1/25 ROCE 7.6% · OPM 35% 76% evidence | 9.1/20 P/E 24.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.9/20 RS sector 6.1% · RS bench -2.7% · 1Y 32.1%11 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.5 + 16.1 + 9.1 + 15.9 = 53.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Charter Communications, Inc.CHTR | 51.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0 pp 45% evidence | 16.6/25 ROCE 3.5% · OPM 23.6% 76% evidence | 11.2/20 P/E 3.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.7/20 RS sector -26.7% · RS bench -33.3% · 1Y -40.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 16.6 + 11.2 + 6.7 = 51.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7Iridium Communications Inc.IRDM | 51.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | LEADER | 12.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.9 pp 45% evidence | 10.0/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 23.2% 76% evidence | 8.8/20 P/E 62.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.6/20 RS sector 69% · RS bench 54.9% · 1Y 108.4%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.8 + 10 + 8.8 + 19.6 = 51.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Globalstar, Inc.GSAT | 50.7/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.7/35 Revenue 11.9% · PAT — · OPM change 25.9 pp 62% evidence | 5.5/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 11.7% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 13.5/20 RS sector 32.6% · RS bench 21% · 1Y 194%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.7 + 5.5 + 10 + 13.5 = 50.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9AT&T Inc.T | 50.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 19.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.3 pp 45% evidence | 12.0/25 ROCE 1.9% · OPM 21.1% 76% evidence | 10.6/20 P/E 6.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.3/20 RS sector -11% · RS bench -18.9% · 1Y -16.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 12 + 10.6 + 8.3 = 50.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10Telefônica Brasil S.A.VIV | 48.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 20.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.2 pp 45% evidence | 13.8/25 ROCE 2.6% · OPM 15% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 16.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.7/20 RS sector -10.7% · RS bench -18.8% · 1Y 1.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 13.8 + 9.6 + 4.7 = 48.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 11Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.AD | 47.9/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | BASING | 23.8/35 Revenue 6.9% · PAT — · OPM change 418.9 pp 62% evidence | 13.6/25 ROCE 2.4% · OPM 309.1% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 19.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.2/20 RS sector -27.9% · RS bench -34.2% · 1Y -52.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.8 + 13.6 + 9.3 + 1.2 = 47.9 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -27.9% and the one-year return is -52.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 12Rogers Communications Inc.RCI | 46.5/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 16.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp 45% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 1.5% · OPM 20.9% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.4/20 RS sector -9.1% · RS bench -17% · 1Y -0.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.6 + 11.5 + 11 + 7.4 = 46.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13T-Mobile US, Inc.TMUS | 45.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 16.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.5 pp 45% evidence | 14.1/25 ROCE 2.9% · OPM 19.5% 76% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 17.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.3/20 RS sector -16% · RS bench -23.3% · 1Y -27.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.1 + 14.1 + 9.4 + 6.3 = 45.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 14Comcast CorporationCMCSA | 43.8/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 14.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.8 pp 45% evidence | 12.0/25 ROCE 2.2% · OPM 13.1% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 7.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.5/20 RS sector -13.5% · RS bench -21.2% · 1Y -21.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.1 + 12 + 10.2 + 7.5 = 43.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 15Telephone and Data Systems, Inc.TDS | 43.0/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | BASING | 20.5/35 Revenue -0.7% · PAT — · OPM change 58 pp 62% evidence | 10.3/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 47.6% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 79.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.7/20 RS sector -13.2% · RS bench -21% · 1Y -7.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 10.3 + 8.5 + 3.7 = 43 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 16Lumen Technologies, Inc.LUMN | 43.0/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.4/35 Revenue -6.8% · PAT — · OPM change 17.4 pp 62% evidence | 9.9/25 ROCE 2.1% · OPM 20.8% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 3.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.4/20 RS sector -12.5% · RS bench -20.2% · 1Y 78.5%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 9.9 + 11.3 + 3.4 = 43 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 17EchoStar CorporationECHO | 40.5/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.7/35 Revenue -5.6% · PAT — · OPM change 13 pp 62% evidence | 5.8/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 10.7% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 2.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.5/20 RS sector -6.8% · RS bench -15.5% · 1Y 238.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.7 + 5.8 + 11.5 + 5.5 = 40.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 18Liberty Global Ltd.LBTYA | 35.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | BASING | 12.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -3.3 pp 45% evidence | 4.0/25 ROCE 0% · OPM 1.9% 76% evidence | 10.9/20 P/E 4.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.9/20 RS sector -6.3% · RS bench -14.5% · 1Y -1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.6 + 4 + 10.9 + 7.9 = 35.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 19TELUS CorporationTU | 29.4/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -4.3 pp 45% evidence | 6.6/25 ROCE -3.3% · OPM 10.7% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 30.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 1.2/20 RS sector -30% · RS bench -36.1% · 1Y -40.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.6 + 6.6 + 9 + 1.2 = 29.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 20Vodafone Group Public Limited CompanyVOD | 51.6/100Thin evidence · provisional44% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 16% evidence | 7.8/25 ROCE 0.3% · OPM — 61% evidence | 10.1/20 P/E 9.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.0/20 RS sector 12.6% · RS bench 2.6% · 1Y 38.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.7 + 7.8 + 10.1 + 15 = 51.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 21Liberty Broadband CorporationLBRDA | 43.4/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence | BASING | 17.4/35 Revenue — · PAT -384.1% · OPM change 7.2 pp 10% evidence | 8.2/25 ROCE 0% · OPM 15.7% 76% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 7.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 7.4/20 RS sector -25.4% · RS bench -32.1% · 1Y -37.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.4 + 8.2 + 10.4 + 7.4 = 43.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s stock price today?
Kyivstar Group Ltd. trades at $13.8, +32.2% over the past year. The company is valued at $3.0 B. The stock sits at 66% of its 52-week range of $10–$16, +6.5% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 15 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s latest quarterly results?
Kyivstar Group Ltd. reported revenue of $0.3 B and net profit of $0.1 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 23.1% and profit rose 125.0% year on year. Earnings per share were $0.37. The operating margin was 34.4%, 0.2 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s revenue?
Kyivstar Group Ltd. reported revenue of $0.3 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +23.1% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $1.2 B (+26.1%). Over the last 2 years revenue compounded at 12.3% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s profit?
Kyivstar Group Ltd. earned $0.1 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +125.0% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.1 B. The operating margin ran 34.4% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s market cap?
Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s market capitalisation is $3.0 B at a stock price of $13.8. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s P/E ratio?
Kyivstar Group Ltd. trades at a P/E of 18.6×, at the 61st percentile of its own 2-year range, against a long-run median of 16.5×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Kyivstar Group Ltd. pay a dividend?
No — Kyivstar Group Ltd. has declared no dividend per share in any of its last 9 reported quarters, so there is no payout history and no yield to quote. That is a reading of the filed statements, not an estimate. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Kyivstar Group Ltd. overvalued?
On its own history, Kyivstar Group Ltd. looks mid-range against its own history: its P/E of 18.6× sits at the 61st percentile of its 2-year range (long-run median 16.5×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Kyivstar Group Ltd. growing?
Yes — Kyivstar Group Ltd. is growing: latest-quarter revenue +23.1% year on year, profit +125.0%, and the margin −0.2 pp at 34.4%. The 2-year compound rates are 12.3% (revenue) and −34.5% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Kyivstar Group Ltd. performing?
Kyivstar Group Ltd. is in a confirmed uptrend, 15 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 23.1% and profit rose 125.0% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Kyivstar Group Ltd. in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 15 of stage 2), trading +6.5% versus its 200-day average and at 66% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Kyivstar Group Ltd. beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Kyivstar Group Ltd. is currently behind the S&P 500 (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-31), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 1.7 years the stock moved +38% against the S&P 500's +27% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Kyivstar Group Ltd. What it measures instead: the stock price is $13.8, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 15 weeks in. Its P/E of 18.6× sits at the 61st percentile of its own 2-year range. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is the market betting against Kyivstar Group Ltd.?
Somewhat — short interest is 5.9% of Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s tradable float, about 2.6 days to cover at typical volumes. A moderate reading: some money is positioned against it. With no quarter-by-quarter holder register here, short interest is the cleanest crowd read we hold — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Kyivstar Group Ltd. have too much debt?
It is moderate — Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s debt-to-equity is 0.39. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s capex?
Kyivstar Group Ltd. spent $1.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $0.3 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s cash flow?
Kyivstar Group Ltd. generated $0.6 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $0.3 B of free cash flow after $0.3 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.1 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 206% of Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $0.6 B against reported profit of $0.1 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Kyivstar Group Ltd. in its business cycle?
Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s FY25 operating margin was 23.3%, against a 3-year band of 23.3%–39.1%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 34.4%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Kyivstar Group Ltd. story?
The sharpest disagreement: the price moved +32.2% in a year while annual EPS moved −58.4% — the difference is re-rating, and re-rating has to be repaid with earnings. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Kyivstar Group Ltd. a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Kyivstar Group Ltd.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.