AXIA Energia SA share price

AXIA Energia SA's share price was $10.22 at the close on 6 August 2026. It has been moving sideways for 11 weeks. That is 6.5% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $8 and $13, and at that close it sat 46% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today AXIA Energia SA is in stage 1. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the S&P 500, and it has been behind for 13 weeks running.

Over the last 10 years the share price moved +145% while the S&P 500 moved +264%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 8 May 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

AXIA Energia SA pays no dividend. In the last 12 reported quarters it declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to show. Companies like this usually keep their earnings in the business, so the cash-flow sections show where that cash goes.

AXIA Energia SA is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list.

AXIA Energia SA earned ₹2.6 B of net profit in the Mar 2026 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹6.6 B. Over 4 years profit has grown −20.4% a year on average. That is 20.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹0.4 B. 4 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY25 profit was ₹6.6 B (−36.8% on the year before).

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −208.4% and revenue +5.7%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

AXIA Energia SA reported ₹12.7 B of revenue in the Mar 2026 quarter, +22.1% on the same quarter a year earlier. Over 4 years it has grown 4.5% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹41.3 B. The last four reported quarters add to ₹43.6 B.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

FY25 revenue was ₹41.3 B, +2.7% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +5.7% on average, against 4.5% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +4.1%, against +9.0% a year over the last 8 quarters (rolling over).

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

AXIA Energia SA's operating margin was 24.1% in the Mar 2026 quarter, 26.9 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between 4.7% and 70.3%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +26.9 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +6.9 points. So the gain came mostly from costs below the gross margin, such as staff and overheads, measured against sales.

Over the last 3 years, 162% of AXIA Energia SA's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in ₹14.5 B of operating cash against ₹6.6 B of profit. After ₹2.1 B of spending on assets, ₹12.4 B was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

AXIA Energia SA does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent ₹9.0 B on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 7.3% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn.

Spending on assets: ₹9.0 B over the last 3 years.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

AXIA Energia SA's P/E is 12.7×, with too little history to compare. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

In short: there is too little history to say whether the multiple is high or low for this company, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

AXIA Energia SA's business is giving mixed signals. There is no clear direction across the growth lines, with ROCE falling at 4.7%; each line tells part of the story. This is based on 12 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: when the lines disagree, each line above matters more than any single label.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the stock price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

AXIA Energia SA earned a ROE of 6% in FY25. That is up from a low of 2% in FY22. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is left out: on sales this small it reads 4%, a number that says nothing useful about the business. It comes from a 15.9% net margin and 0.15× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. We do not have the full capital split, so ROE is the longest history we can draw here.

Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 15.9% net margin × 0.15× asset turnover × 2.36× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 5.6% on equity. The margin does most of the work; borrowing is a big part of it.

AXIA Energia SA's debt-to-equity is 0.63 at the latest reading: a moderate amount of borrowing. A full history of its borrowings is not in our data.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Interest cover shows how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low debt and high cover are the safe combination.

That is a moderate amount of borrowing behind the returns on this page. We only have the latest reading, so no chart is drawn.

We have no ownership or short-position figures for AXIA Energia SA, so this section says so rather than fill the gap. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 1.6 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead.

There is no quarter-by-quarter list of owners here, so we look at short interest: the share of tradable shares held in short positions, which gain if the price falls.

For AXIA Energia SA, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

45.8 out of 100, rank 11 of 12 in Utilities - Renewable, with 34% of the evidence available. It is provisional, so it is ranked below companies with full evidence.

AXIA Energia SA scores 45.8 out of 100 against the 12 companies it is compared with in Utilities - Renewable, ranking 11. Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose.

The three scored parts add up to the total exactly: 16.8 + 16.1 + 12.9 = 45.8 (no relative-strength reading this week; its 20 points are shared across the other three). This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

AXIA Energia SA ranks 11 of 12 Utilities - Renewable companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 45.8 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Jun 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Utilities - Renewable, all 12 compared on one page.

AXIA Energia SA is the largest of 12 Utilities - Renewable companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 4 November 2026). It is the largest. Just below it: Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P., Brookfield Renewable Corporation, Enlight Renewable Energy, Clearway Energy, Inc., Ormat Technologies, Inc. and SOLV Energy, Inc.

Utilities - Renewable companies close in size

1. AXIA Energia SA $29.6 billion
2. Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. $21.1 billion
3. Brookfield Renewable Corporation $10.9 billion
4. Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd $10.1 billion
5. Clearway Energy, Inc. $7.3 billion
6. Ormat Technologies, Inc. $5.8 billion
7. SOLV Energy, Inc. $5.3 billion

All 12 Utilities - Renewable companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

466. Celestica Inc. $29.8 billion · Electronic Components
467. Atmos Energy Corporation $29.7 billion · Utilities - Regulated Gas
468. AXIA Energia SA $29.6 billion
469. PG&E Corporation $29.5 billion · Utilities - Regulated Electric
470. Tradeweb Markets Inc. $29.5 billion · Capital Markets

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 6 August 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.