Real Estate - Development Stocks
Real Estate - Development: Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. owns the largest revenue base; Belpointe PREP, LLC has the fastest current growth.
How has Real Estate - Development moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 44% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 30% on average over the last four reported quarters.
RS ↑2w · 4/7 >200d (+0) · 3/7 lead (+2) · EPS 1/6↑
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 7 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Is Real Estate - Development outperforming S&P 500?
Real Estate - Development has underperformed S&P 500 by 18.6% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 0.1%. 2 of 10 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Sky Harbour Group Corporation is the strongest against the sector itself at +11.4%.
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Real Estate - Development has underperformed S&P 500 by 18.6% over 52 weeks and 0.1% over 13 weeks. 2 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 10 beat the sector itself. Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. leads with revenue of $1,511 million, based on 6 of 10 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1AMREP CorporationAXR | 59.9/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence | BASING | 21.5/35 Revenue -10.2% · PAT 16.7% · OPM change 14.9 pp 83% evidence | 15.7/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 20.6% 76% evidence | 15.7/20 P/E 8.7× · PEG 0.22 65% evidence | 7.0/20 RS sector -6.1% · RS bench -13.9% · 1Y 2.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.5 + 15.7 + 15.7 + 7 = 59.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Forestar Group Inc.FOR | 57.1/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | FADING | 18.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.3 pp 45% evidence | 14.8/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 11.3% 76% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 9.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.7/20 RS sector 6.4% · RS bench -2.6% · 1Y 12.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.2 + 14.8 + 10.4 + 13.7 = 57.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3Century Communities, Inc.CCS | 54.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | TURNING | 15.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.2 pp 45% evidence | 11.6/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 4.2% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 15.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 18.2/20 RS sector 10.4% · RS bench 0.7% · 1Y 15.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.3 + 11.6 + 9.6 + 18.2 = 54.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V.VTMX | 53.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.3 pp 45% evidence | 15.2/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 77.6% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 7.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 9.2/20 RS sector 4.3% · RS bench -4% · 1Y 20%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.8 + 15.2 + 11.1 + 9.2 = 53.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Logistic Properties of the AmericasLPA | 41.6/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence | 17.8/35 Revenue 17.8% · PAT -75% · OPM change 6.3 pp 83% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 56.2% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 33× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.6/20 RS sector -15.8% · RS bench -24.3% · 1Y -53.6%3 of 8 weeks ahead to 2026-07-10 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.8 + 11.3 + 8.9 + 3.6 = 41.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Five Point Holdings, LLCFPH | 40.4/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | TURNING | 15.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -24.2 pp 45% evidence | 5.5/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -71% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 7.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 8.1/20 RS sector -5.2% · RS bench -13.6% · 1Y -1.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.3 + 5.5 + 11.5 + 8.1 = 40.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7Belpointe PREP, LLCOZ | 36.7/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence | BASING | 20.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 125.5 pp 62% evidence | 3.0/25 ROCE -1.1% · OPM -133.2% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 3.4/20 RS sector -16.3% · RS bench -24% · 1Y -24.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.3 + 3 + 10 + 3.4 = 36.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 8Smith Douglas Homes Corp.SDHC | 33.1/100Adverse evidence65% evidence | TURNING | 7.2/35 Revenue -5.8% · PAT -52.3% · OPM change -6.9 pp 83% evidence | 9.9/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 2.2% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 13.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -8.5% · RS bench -17% · 1Y -17.1%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 7.2 + 9.9 + 10 + 6 = 33.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 9Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.HHH | 29.7/100Adverse evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 8.3/35 Revenue -15.7% · PAT -62.5% · OPM change -2.5 pp 83% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 21.5% 76% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 31× · PEG — 15% evidence | 2.3/20 RS sector -13.1% · RS bench -20.8% · 1Y -7.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.3 + 9.8 + 9.3 + 2.3 = 29.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Sky Harbour Group CorporationSKYH | 57.4/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence | TURNING | 18.6/35 Revenue 63.2% · PAT — · OPM change — 24% evidence | 10.9/25 ROCE — · OPM — 15% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 240.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.4/20 RS sector 11.4% · RS bench 1.8% · 1Y 6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 10.9 + 8.5 + 19.4 = 57.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Market action
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. has the strongest one-year price move in Real Estate - Development at +20%. Sky Harbour Group Corporation leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +1.8%. 2 of 10 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Real Estate - Development itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. has the highest Revenue among the 10 Real Estate - Development companies compared here, at $1,511 million. Smith Douglas Homes Corp. is next at $952 million. Belpointe PREP, LLC has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is the scale leader at $1,511 million, 58.7% ahead of Smith Douglas Homes Corp.. Belpointe PREP, LLC's growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap; the uncapped TTM change is 175% from a $11 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
Investor read: Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is the scale benchmark; Belpointe PREP, LLC is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.'s growth falls below Belpointe PREP, LLC's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Century Communities, Inc. CCS | $790M | -13% | Jun 2026 |
| Forestar Group Inc. FOR | $374M | 6.6% | Jun 2026 |
| Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. HHH | $236M | 19% | Mar 2026 |
| Smith Douglas Homes Corp. SDHC | $206M | -8.4% | Mar 2026 |
| Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. VTMX | $77M | 15% | Jun 2026 |
| AMREP Corporation AXR | $15M | 88% | Mar 2026 |
| Five Point Holdings, LLC FPH | $14M | 7.7% | Jun 2026 |
| Logistic Properties of the Americas LPA | $14M | 17% | Mar 2026 |
| Sky Harbour Group Corporation SKYH | $9M | 50% | Mar 2026 |
| Belpointe PREP, LLC OZ | $4M | 100% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ
Century Communities, Inc. · CCS
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX
Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH
Forestar Group Inc. · FOR
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH
Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA
Sky Harbour Group Corporation · SKYH
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
AMREP Corporation · AXR
Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ
Century Communities, Inc. · CCS
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX
Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH
Forestar Group Inc. · FOR
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH
Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA
Sky Harbour Group Corporation · SKYH
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. has the highest OPM among the 10 Real Estate - Development companies compared here, at 77.6%. Logistic Properties of the Americas is next at 56.2%. Belpointe PREP, LLC has the highest Margin change at +125.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. leads opm at 77.6%; Belpointe PREP, LLC leads margin change at +125.5 percentage points.
Investor read: Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. VTMX | 78% | −1.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Logistic Properties of the Americas LPA | 56% | +6.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. HHH | 22% | −2.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| AMREP Corporation AXR | 21% | +14.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Forestar Group Inc. FOR | 11% | −0.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Century Communities, Inc. CCS | 4.2% | −2.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Smith Douglas Homes Corp. SDHC | 2.2% | −6.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Five Point Holdings, LLC FPH | -71% | −24.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Belpointe PREP, LLC OZ | -133% | +125.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
AMREP Corporation · AXR
Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ
Century Communities, Inc. · CCS
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX
Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH
Forestar Group Inc. · FOR
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH
Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC
Margin change · reported quarter history
AMREP Corporation · AXR
Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ
Century Communities, Inc. · CCS
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX
Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH
Forestar Group Inc. · FOR
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH
Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 10 Real Estate - Development companies compared here, at $120 million. Smith Douglas Homes Corp. is next at $53 million. AMREP Corporation has the highest Profit growth at 16.7%, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Net profit series carries 15 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. leads with $120 million of TTM profit, 126.4% above Smith Douglas Homes Corp.. AMREP Corporation shows 16.7% growth from a $14 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
Investor read: Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. VTMX | $101M | 573% | Jun 2026 |
| Forestar Group Inc. FOR | $32M | 0.0% | Jun 2026 |
| Century Communities, Inc. CCS | $24M | -38% | Jun 2026 |
| Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. HHH | $8M | -27% | Mar 2026 |
| Smith Douglas Homes Corp. SDHC | $4M | -79% | Mar 2026 |
| AMREP Corporation AXR | $3M | 200% | Mar 2026 |
| Five Point Holdings, LLC FPH | $-5M | -108% | Jun 2026 |
| Logistic Properties of the Americas LPA | $-8M | -900% | Mar 2026 |
| Sky Harbour Group Corporation SKYH | $-9M | 250% | Mar 2026 |
| Belpointe PREP, LLC OZ | $-11M | — | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
AMREP Corporation · AXR
Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ
Century Communities, Inc. · CCS
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX
Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH
Forestar Group Inc. · FOR
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH
Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA
Sky Harbour Group Corporation · SKYH
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC
Profit growth · reported quarter history
AMREP Corporation · AXR
Century Communities, Inc. · CCS
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX
Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH
Forestar Group Inc. · FOR
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH
Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA
Sky Harbour Group Corporation · SKYH
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC
Return On Capital Employed
AMREP Corporation has the highest ROCE among the 10 Real Estate - Development companies compared here, at 2.3%. Forestar Group Inc. is next at 1.7%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +1.9 percentage points. 9 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: AMREP Corporation leads ROCE at 2.3%, 0.6 percentage points above Forestar Group Inc.. AMREP Corporation has the strongest latest improvement at +1.9 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
Investor read: AMREP Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMREP Corporation AXR | 2.3% | +1.9 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Forestar Group Inc. FOR | 1.7% | 0.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. VTMX | 1.4% | +0.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Century Communities, Inc. CCS | 1.3% | −0.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Logistic Properties of the Americas LPA | 1.3% | +0.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Smith Douglas Homes Corp. SDHC | 1.1% | −4.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. HHH | 0.6% | 0.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Five Point Holdings, LLC FPH | -0.2% | +0.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Belpointe PREP, LLC OZ | -1.1% | −0.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
AMREP Corporation · AXR
Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ
Century Communities, Inc. · CCS
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX
Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH
Forestar Group Inc. · FOR
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH
Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC
ROCE change · reported quarter history
AMREP Corporation · AXR
Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ
Century Communities, Inc. · CCS
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX
Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH
Forestar Group Inc. · FOR
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH
Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
AMREP Corporation has the lowest PEG among the 10 Real Estate - Development companies compared here, at 0.22×. Five Point Holdings, LLC has the lowest P/E at 7.42×, so level and change sit with different companies. 1 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: AMREP Corporation has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.22×. Only 1 of 10 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Century Communities, Inc. CCS | 1.0 | 15.7 | Jun 2026 |
| Forestar Group Inc. FOR | 0.4 | 9.5 | Jun 2026 |
| Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. VTMX | 0.4 | 7.5 | Jun 2026 |
| AMREP Corporation AXR | 0.2 | 8.7 | Mar 2026 |
| Five Point Holdings, LLC FPH | 0.1 | 7.4 | Jun 2026 |
| Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. HHH | — | 31.0 | Mar 2026 |
| Sky Harbour Group Corporation SKYH | — | 240.8 | Mar 2026 |
| Smith Douglas Homes Corp. SDHC | — | 13.5 | Mar 2026 |
| Logistic Properties of the Americas LPA | — | 33.0 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
AMREP Corporation · AXR
Century Communities, Inc. · CCS
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX
Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH
Forestar Group Inc. · FOR
P/E · reported quarter history
AMREP Corporation · AXR
Century Communities, Inc. · CCS
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX
Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH
Forestar Group Inc. · FOR
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH
Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA
Sky Harbour Group Corporation · SKYH
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Real Estate - Development comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 10 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 10 Real Estate - Development companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
Real Estate - Development company comparison FAQs
These 22 answers restate the Real Estate - Development comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 10 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Real Estate - Development sector outperforming S&P 500?
Real Estate - Development has underperformed S&P 500 by 18.6% over 52 weeks and 0.1% over 13 weeks. 2 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 10 beat the sector itself.
Which Real Estate - Development company is largest by revenue?
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. leads with revenue of $1,511 million, based on 6 of 10 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Real Estate - Development company is growing fastest?
Belpointe PREP, LLC has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 6 of 10 comparable companies.
Which Real Estate - Development company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
AMREP Corporation ranks first at 59.9/100 with 75.1% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Real Estate - Development company has the lowest comparable PEG?
AMREP Corporation has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.22, among 1 of 10 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Real Estate - Development comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Real Estate - Development company is the biggest?
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $1,511 million, ahead of Smith Douglas Homes Corp. at $952 million. That covers 6 of 10 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Real Estate - Development company has the best profit margins?
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. has the highest operating margin at 77.6%, from 9 of 10 comparable companies. Belpointe PREP, LLC shows the biggest recent improvement, at +125.5 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Real Estate - Development company makes the most profit?
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. earns the most, at $120 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 6 of 10 comparable companies. AMREP Corporation has the fastest profit growth at 16.7%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Real Estate - Development company earns the highest return on capital?
AMREP Corporation leads on return on capital employed at 2.3%, across 9 of 10 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Real Estate - Development stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — AMREP Corporation screens cheapest at 0.22×. Only 1 of 10 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Real Estate - Development sector beating the market?
Real Estate - Development has underperformed S&P 500 by 18.6% over the last 52 weeks and 0.1% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 2 of 10 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Real Estate - Development stock has the strongest price momentum?
Sky Harbour Group Corporation has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Real Estate - Development company scores highest for research priority?
AMREP Corporation scores 59.9 out of 100 with 75.1% evidence confidence, from 21.5 points on growth and earnings, 15.7 on capital efficiency, 15.7 on valuation and 7 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Real Estate - Development companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 10 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Real Estate - Development sector?
The 10 Real Estate - Development companies on this page carry $13,250 million of combined market value. Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is the largest at $3,882 million, about 29% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.
What is the Real Estate - Development sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 10 Real Estate - Development companies on this page is 13.5×, measured on the 9 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.
How is the Real Estate - Development sector performing?
2 of the 10 covered Real Estate - Development companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 18.6% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.
How many Real Estate - Development stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 10 listed Real Estate - Development companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.