Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-04
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Real Estate - Development Stocks

Real Estate - Development: Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. owns the largest revenue base; Belpointe PREP, LLC has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Real Estate - Development moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 44% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 30% on average over the last four reported quarters.

TURNING · ahead 2wPrice down, no fundamental support3 of 7 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS ↑2w · 4/7 >200d (+0) · 3/7 lead (+2) · EPS 1/6↑

20020262025202420232022 252348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100112Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Jun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · down 30.0% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 50, against 100 at the start · down 32.5% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 52, against 100 at the start · down 17.3% on a year ago · 3 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 59, against 100 at the start · up 7.7% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 65, against 100 at the start · up 18.6% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 112, against 100 at the start · up 30.4% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 95, against 100 at the start · up 28.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 88, against 100 at the start · up 7.2% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 81, against 100 at the start · down 17.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 79, against 100 at the start · down 18.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 61, against 100 at the start · down 32.8% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 58, against 100 at the start · down 51.2% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Real Estate - Development filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingJun 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Real Estate - Development filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingSep 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Real Estate - Development filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingDec 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Real Estate - Development filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingMar 2023 · too few reporting — 2 of the Real Estate - Development filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two58 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
20020262025202420232022 252348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100112Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Jun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · down 30.0% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 50, against 100 at the start · down 32.5% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 52, against 100 at the start · down 17.3% on a year ago · 3 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 59, against 100 at the start · up 7.7% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 65, against 100 at the start · up 18.6% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 112, against 100 at the start · up 30.4% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 95, against 100 at the start · up 28.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 88, against 100 at the start · up 7.2% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 81, against 100 at the start · down 17.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 79, against 100 at the start · down 18.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 61, against 100 at the start · down 32.8% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 58, against 100 at the start · down 51.2% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Real Estate - Development filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingJun 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Real Estate - Development filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingSep 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Real Estate - Development filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingDec 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Real Estate - Development filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingMar 2023 · too few reporting — 2 of the Real Estate - Development filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two58No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Real Estate - Development, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 7 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Real Estate - Development outperforming S&P 500?

Real Estate - Development has underperformed S&P 500 by 18.6% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 0.1%. 2 of 10 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Sky Harbour Group Corporation is the strongest against the sector itself at +11.4%.

-0.1%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
-18.6%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
2/10Stocks leading S&P 500
4/10Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Real Estate - Development has underperformed S&P 500 by 18.6% over 52 weeks and 0.1% over 13 weeks. 2 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 10 beat the sector itself. Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. leads with revenue of $1,511 million, based on 6 of 10 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Companies
10
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$13.3B
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.
Revenue growing
3/6
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
2/10
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 10
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
AMREP Corporation has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 75.1% evidence confidence.
Century Communities, Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1AMREP CorporationAXR 59.9/100Mixed-positive evidence75% evidence BASING 21.5/35 Revenue -10.2% · PAT 16.7% · OPM change 14.9 pp 83% evidence 15.7/25 ROCE 2.3% · OPM 20.6% 76% evidence 15.7/20 P/E 8.7× · PEG 0.22 65% evidence 7.0/20 RS sector -6.1% · RS bench -13.9% · 1Y 2.8%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21.5 + 15.7 + 15.7 + 7 = 59.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Forestar Group Inc.FOR 57.1/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence FADING 18.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.3 pp 45% evidence 14.8/25 ROCE 1.7% · OPM 11.3% 76% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 9.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.7/20 RS sector 6.4% · RS bench -2.6% · 1Y 12.9%5 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.2 + 14.8 + 10.4 + 13.7 = 57.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3Century Communities, Inc.CCS 54.7/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence TURNING 15.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.2 pp 45% evidence 11.6/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 4.2% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 15.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 18.2/20 RS sector 10.4% · RS bench 0.7% · 1Y 15.6%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.3 + 11.6 + 9.6 + 18.2 = 54.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V.VTMX 53.3/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence ASLEEP 17.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1.3 pp 45% evidence 15.2/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 77.6% 76% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 7.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.2/20 RS sector 4.3% · RS bench -4% · 1Y 20%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.8 + 15.2 + 11.1 + 9.2 = 53.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Logistic Properties of the AmericasLPA 41.6/100Mixed-negative evidence65% evidence 17.8/35 Revenue 17.8% · PAT -75% · OPM change 6.3 pp 83% evidence 11.3/25 ROCE 1.3% · OPM 56.2% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 33× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.6/20 RS sector -15.8% · RS bench -24.3% · 1Y -53.6%3 of 8 weeks ahead to 2026-07-10 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.8 + 11.3 + 8.9 + 3.6 = 41.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Five Point Holdings, LLCFPH 40.4/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence TURNING 15.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -24.2 pp 45% evidence 5.5/25 ROCE -0.2% · OPM -71% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 7.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 8.1/20 RS sector -5.2% · RS bench -13.6% · 1Y -1.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.3 + 5.5 + 11.5 + 8.1 = 40.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Belpointe PREP, LLCOZ 36.7/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence BASING 20.3/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change 125.5 pp 62% evidence 3.0/25 ROCE -1.1% · OPM -133.2% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.4/20 RS sector -16.3% · RS bench -24% · 1Y -24.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.3 + 3 + 10 + 3.4 = 36.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Smith Douglas Homes Corp.SDHC 33.1/100Adverse evidence65% evidence TURNING 7.2/35 Revenue -5.8% · PAT -52.3% · OPM change -6.9 pp 83% evidence 9.9/25 ROCE 1.1% · OPM 2.2% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E 13.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.0/20 RS sector -8.5% · RS bench -17% · 1Y -17.1%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 7.2 + 9.9 + 10 + 6 = 33.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.HHH 29.7/100Adverse evidence71% evidence ASLEEP 8.3/35 Revenue -15.7% · PAT -62.5% · OPM change -2.5 pp 83% evidence 9.8/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 21.5% 76% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 31× · PEG — 15% evidence 2.3/20 RS sector -13.1% · RS bench -20.8% · 1Y -7.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 8.3 + 9.8 + 9.3 + 2.3 = 29.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Sky Harbour Group CorporationSKYH 57.4/100Thin evidence · provisional35% evidence TURNING 18.6/35 Revenue 63.2% · PAT — · OPM change — 24% evidence 10.9/25 ROCE — · OPM — 15% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 240.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 19.4/20 RS sector 11.4% · RS bench 1.8% · 1Y 6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.6 + 10.9 + 8.5 + 19.4 = 57.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
04 · what price has already done

Market action

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. has the strongest one-year price move in Real Estate - Development at +20%. Sky Harbour Group Corporation leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +1.8%. 2 of 10 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. has the highest Revenue among the 10 Real Estate - Development companies compared here, at $1,511 million. Smith Douglas Homes Corp. is next at $952 million. Belpointe PREP, LLC has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is the scale leader at $1,511 million, 58.7% ahead of Smith Douglas Homes Corp.. Belpointe PREP, LLC's growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap; the uncapped TTM change is 175% from a $11 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderHoward Hughes Holdings Inc. · $1,511 million
Gap58.7% versus #2 · Smith Douglas Homes Corp.
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/10 companies · 177 observations

Investor read: Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is the scale benchmark; Belpointe PREP, LLC is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Howard Hughes Holdings Inc.'s growth falls below Belpointe PREP, LLC's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenue · company comparison
6/10 level · 6/10 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Century Communities, Inc. CCS$790M-13%Jun 2026
Forestar Group Inc. FOR$374M6.6%Jun 2026
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. HHH$236M19%Mar 2026
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. SDHC$206M-8.4%Mar 2026
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. VTMX$77M15%Jun 2026
AMREP Corporation AXR$15M88%Mar 2026
Five Point Holdings, LLC FPH$14M7.7%Jun 2026
Logistic Properties of the Americas LPA$14M17%Mar 2026
Sky Harbour Group Corporation SKYH$9M50%Mar 2026
Belpointe PREP, LLC OZ$4M100%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

AMREP Corporation · AXR

$11M
$16M
$9M
$24M
$11M
$16M
$9M
$13M
$10M
$9M
$13M
$20M
$19M
$12M
$8M
$11M
$18M
$9M
$15M

Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ

$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$1M
$0M
$1M
$0M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$2M
$2M
$2M
$3M
$4M

Century Communities, Inc. · CCS

$958M
$1.2B
$1.0B
$1.2B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$753M
$844M
$889M
$1.2B
$949M
$1.0B
$1.1B
$1.3B
$903M
$1.0B
$980M
$1.2B
$790M

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX

$161M
$43M
$178M
$50M
$214M
$61M
$63M
$64M
$65M
$67M
$67M
$72M
$76M
$77M

Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH

$21M
$182M
$5M
$5M
$15M
$17M
$6M
$21M
$66M
$119M
$10M
$51M
$17M
$160M
$13M
$7M
$13M
$76M
$14M

Forestar Group Inc. · FOR

$419M
$408M
$422M
$309M
$381M
$217M
$302M
$369M
$550M
$306M
$334M
$318M
$551M
$250M
$351M
$391M
$671M
$273M
$374M

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH

$640M
$482M
$196M
$223M
$228M
$313M
$156M
$283M
$327M
$984M
$199M
$261M
$390M
$624M
$236M

Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA

$8M
$8M
$9M
$10M
$10M
$12M
$10M
$11M
$11M
$11M
$12M
$12M
$13M
$14M
$14M

Sky Harbour Group Corporation · SKYH

$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$2M
$3M
$2M
$2M
$4M
$4M
$5M
$6M
$7M
$7M
$8M
$9M

Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC

$138M
$122M
$155M
$170M
$206M
$223M
$168M
$182M
$198M
$217M
$189M
$221M
$278M
$287M
$225M
$224M
$262M
$260M
$206M

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

AMREP Corporation · AXR

26%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-46%
-9.1%
-44%
44%
54%
90%
33%
-38%
-45%
-5.3%
-25%
88%

Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ

-100%
0.0%
100%
200%
100%

Century Communities, Inc. · CCS

12%
19%
-2.3%
-26%
-28%
-22%
2.3%
26%
23%
28%
5.6%
-4.9%
-3.7%
-14%
-3.1%
-13%

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX

11%
20%
22%
-70%
9.8%
6.4%
13%
17%
15%

Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH

-38%
-29%
-91%
20%
320%
340%
600%
67%
143%
-74%
34%
30%
-86%
-24%
-53%
7.7%

Forestar Group Inc. · FOR

-1.3%
-9.1%
-47%
-28%
19%
44%
41%
11%
-14%
0.2%
-18%
5.1%
23%
22%
9.2%
6.6%

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH

-64%
-35%
-20%
27%
43%
214%
28%
-7.8%
19%
-37%
19%

Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA

25%
50%
11%
10%
10%
-8.3%
20%
9.1%
18%
27%
17%

Sky Harbour Group Corporation · SKYH

100%
100%
100%
33%
150%
200%
75%
75%
60%
50%

Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC

49%
83%
8.4%
7.1%
-3.9%
-2.7%
13%
21%
40%
32%
19%
1.4%
-5.8%
-9.4%
-8.4%
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. has the highest OPM among the 10 Real Estate - Development companies compared here, at 77.6%. Logistic Properties of the Americas is next at 56.2%. Belpointe PREP, LLC has the highest Margin change at +125.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. leads opm at 77.6%; Belpointe PREP, LLC leads margin change at +125.5 percentage points.

LeaderCorporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · 77.6%
Gap38.1% versus #2 · Logistic Properties of the Americas
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage9/10 companies · 161 observations

Investor read: Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Operating margin · company comparison
9/10 level · 9/10 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. VTMX78%−1.3 ppJun 2026
Logistic Properties of the Americas LPA56%+6.3 ppMar 2026
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. HHH22%−2.5 ppMar 2026
AMREP Corporation AXR21%+14.9 ppMar 2026
Forestar Group Inc. FOR11%−0.3 ppJun 2026
Century Communities, Inc. CCS4.2%−2.2 ppJun 2026
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. SDHC2.2%−6.9 ppMar 2026
Five Point Holdings, LLC FPH-71%−24.2 ppJun 2026
Belpointe PREP, LLC OZ-133%+125.5 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

AMREP Corporation · AXR

17%
27%
12%
60%
24%
28%
-5.2%
-5.8%
20%
12%
-1.2%
24%
26%
26%
5.7%
32%
34%
12%
21%

Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ

-75%
-761%
-754%
-526%
-698%
-564%
-550%
-708%
-780%
-793%
-420%
-388%
-259%
-250%
-193%
-214%
-133%

Century Communities, Inc. · CCS

17%
17%
19%
19%
16%
10%
5.6%
8.3%
13%
11%
9.9%
11%
10%
9.4%
6.4%
6.4%
6.2%
11%
4.2%

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX

80%
78%
80%
80%
81%
78%
78%
80%
80%
65%
79%
76%
78%
67%
79%
76%
77%
72%
78%

Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH

-49%
28%
-734%
-220%
-37%
-32%
-203%
-13%
17%
25%
-79%
50%
-2.3%
31%
-47%
-164%
-59%
25%
-71%

Forestar Group Inc. · FOR

13%
13%
15%
16%
17%
11%
11%
16%
16%
15%
16%
13%
18%
7.6%
12%
11%
16%
6.8%
11%

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH

25%
28%
7.6%
0.3%
26%
32%
8.1%
31%
61%
27%
24%
26%
49%
4.2%
22%

Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA

68%
74%
73%
76%
61%
59%
-355%
43%
44%
39%
50%
44%
51%
56%
56%

Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC

11%
9.5%
18%
19%
19%
18%
17%
17%
17%
14%
12%
12%
14%
11%
9.1%
7.7%
7.2%
6.0%
2.2%

Margin change · reported quarter history

AMREP Corporation · AXR

+31.2 pp
+6.9 pp
+0.6 pp
−17.5 pp
−65.3 pp
−4.3 pp
−15.8 pp
+4.0 pp
+29.7 pp
+6.4 pp
+14.5 pp
+6.9 pp
+7.8 pp
+8.3 pp
−14.5 pp
+14.9 pp

Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ

−736.1 pp
−450.8 pp
+334.9 pp
+196.6 pp
+203.2 pp
−182.1 pp
−82.6 pp
−437.3 pp
−242.4 pp
+288.6 pp
+392.8 pp
+742.8 pp
+542.4 pp
+226.4 pp
+174.0 pp
+125.5 pp

Century Communities, Inc. · CCS

+4.2 pp
−1.4 pp
−7.4 pp
−13.1 pp
−10.6 pp
−2.7 pp
+0.6 pp
+4.3 pp
+2.3 pp
−2.7 pp
−1.2 pp
−3.5 pp
−4.2 pp
−3.9 pp
+1.2 pp
−2.2 pp

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX

−0.2 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.5 pp
−1.8 pp
−0.4 pp
−1.4 pp
−13.5 pp
+0.7 pp
−4.0 pp
−1.5 pp
+2.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.9 pp
−1.1 pp
+4.9 pp
−1.3 pp

Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH

−0.6 pp
+12.5 pp
−59.5 pp
+530.7 pp
+206.2 pp
+54.0 pp
+56.7 pp
+124.1 pp
+63.7 pp
−19.4 pp
+6.6 pp
+32.4 pp
−213.9 pp
−56.2 pp
−6.4 pp
−24.2 pp

Forestar Group Inc. · FOR

+3.7 pp
+3.8 pp
−1.3 pp
−3.8 pp
−0.2 pp
−1.0 pp
+3.3 pp
+4.9 pp
−2.6 pp
+1.9 pp
−7.1 pp
−4.5 pp
−2.5 pp
−2.1 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.3 pp

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH

+1.4 pp
+3.8 pp
+0.5 pp
+30.9 pp
+34.6 pp
−5.6 pp
+15.9 pp
−5.2 pp
−12.0 pp
−22.3 pp
−2.5 pp

Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA

−7.7 pp
−15.4 pp
−428.2 pp
−33.4 pp
−17.1 pp
−19.2 pp
+404.9 pp
+0.7 pp
+7.7 pp
+16.3 pp
+6.3 pp

Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC

+7.7 pp
+8.8 pp
−0.9 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.2 pp
−4.4 pp
−5.5 pp
−4.7 pp
−3.1 pp
−3.3 pp
−2.5 pp
−4.6 pp
−7.0 pp
−4.6 pp
−6.9 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 10 Real Estate - Development companies compared here, at $120 million. Smith Douglas Homes Corp. is next at $53 million. AMREP Corporation has the highest Profit growth at 16.7%, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Net profit series carries 15 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. leads with $120 million of TTM profit, 126.4% above Smith Douglas Homes Corp.. AMREP Corporation shows 16.7% growth from a $14 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderHoward Hughes Holdings Inc. · $120 million
Gap126.4% versus #2 · Smith Douglas Homes Corp.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/10 companies · 182 observations

Investor read: Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profit · company comparison
6/10 level · 4/10 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. VTMX$101M573%Jun 2026
Forestar Group Inc. FOR$32M0.0%Jun 2026
Century Communities, Inc. CCS$24M-38%Jun 2026
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. HHH$8M-27%Mar 2026
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. SDHC$4M-79%Mar 2026
AMREP Corporation AXR$3M200%Mar 2026
Five Point Holdings, LLC FPH$-5M-108%Jun 2026
Logistic Properties of the Americas LPA$-8M-900%Mar 2026
Sky Harbour Group Corporation SKYH$-9M250%Mar 2026
Belpointe PREP, LLC OZ$-11MMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

AMREP Corporation · AXR

$2M
$3M
$1M
$10M
$2M
$4M
$17M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$0M
$4M
$4M
$3M
$1M
$4M
$5M
$2M
$3M

Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ

$0M
$-1M
$-2M
$-2M
$-1M
$-3M
$-3M
$-4M
$-3M
$-4M
$-4M
$-5M
$-7M
$-8M
$-9M
$-8M
$-12M
$-12M
$-11M

Century Communities, Inc. · CCS

$114M
$165M
$142M
$159M
$144M
$79M
$33M
$51M
$83M
$91M
$64M
$84M
$83M
$103M
$39M
$35M
$37M
$36M
$24M

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX

$5M
$46M
$49M
$54M
$62M
$79M
$55M
$71M
$76M
$114M
$125M
$109M
$52M
$-63M
$15M
$28M
$25M
$174M
$101M

Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH

$-8M
$47M
$-37M
$-11M
$-10M
$22M
$-10M
$51M
$14M
$59M
$6M
$38M
$12M
$121M
$61M
$9M
$56M
$59M
$-5M

Forestar Group Inc. · FOR

$44M
$41M
$48M
$40M
$51M
$21M
$27M
$47M
$72M
$38M
$45M
$39M
$82M
$17M
$32M
$33M
$87M
$15M
$32M

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH

$108M
$53M
$-23M
$-19M
$32M
$54M
$-21M
$47M
$97M
$165M
$11M
$-12M
$119M
$5M
$8M

Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA

$0M
$-3M
$11M
$-5M
$2M
$-2M
$-46M
$12M
$5M
$10M
$1M
$-1M
$5M
$11M
$-8M

Sky Harbour Group Corporation · SKYH

$-4M
$-5M
$-20M
$10M
$-3M
$-1M
$-9M
$-2M
$-2M
$-13M
$-21M
$4M
$-21M
$-16M
$-9M
$14M
$-5M
$7M
$-9M

Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC

$20M
$11M
$28M
$32M
$38M
$41M
$29M
$31M
$34M
$30M
$20M
$25M
$38M
$29M
$19M
$16M
$16M
$17M
$4M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

AMREP Corporation · AXR

150%
0.0%
33%
1,600%
-100%
-50%
-75%
-100%
300%
200%
0.0%
25%
-33%
200%

Century Communities, Inc. · CCS

35%
26%
-52%
-77%
-68%
-42%
15%
94%
65%
0.0%
13%
-39%
-58%
-55%
-65%
-38%

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX

-50%
1,140%
72%
12%
31%
23%
44%
127%
54%
-32%
-155%
-88%
-74%
-52%
573%

Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH

-53%
168%
-25%
-14%
105%
917%
-76%
367%
-51%
-108%

Forestar Group Inc. · FOR

150%
16%
-49%
-44%
18%
41%
81%
67%
-17%
14%
-55%
-29%
-15%
6.1%
-12%
0.0%

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH

-70%
1.9%
203%
206%
-126%
23%
-97%
-27%

Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA

-518%
150%
-108%
0.0%
10%
-900%

Sky Harbour Group Corporation · SKYH

-120%
250%

Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC

90%
273%
3.6%
-3.1%
-11%
-27%
-31%
-19%
12%
-3.3%
-5.0%
-36%
-58%
-41%
-79%
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

AMREP Corporation has the highest ROCE among the 10 Real Estate - Development companies compared here, at 2.3%. Forestar Group Inc. is next at 1.7%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +1.9 percentage points. 9 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: AMREP Corporation leads ROCE at 2.3%, 0.6 percentage points above Forestar Group Inc.. AMREP Corporation has the strongest latest improvement at +1.9 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderAMREP Corporation · 2.3%
Gap35.3% versus #2 · Forestar Group Inc.
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage9/10 companies · 165 observations

Investor read: AMREP Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
Return on capital · company comparison
9/10 level · 9/10 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
AMREP Corporation AXR2.3%+1.9 ppMar 2026
Forestar Group Inc. FOR1.7%0.0 ppJun 2026
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. VTMX1.4%+0.1 ppJun 2026
Century Communities, Inc. CCS1.3%−0.1 ppJun 2026
Logistic Properties of the Americas LPA1.3%+0.3 ppMar 2026
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. SDHC1.1%−4.3 ppMar 2026
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. HHH0.6%0.0 ppMar 2026
Five Point Holdings, LLC FPH-0.2%+0.2 ppJun 2026
Belpointe PREP, LLC OZ-1.1%−0.1 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

AMREP Corporation · AXR

1.9%
4.6%
1.2%
16%
2.8%
4.7%
-0.5%
-0.7%
2.0%
1.0%
-0.1%
4.1%
4.3%
2.6%
0.4%
2.9%
4.8%
0.9%
2.3%

Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ

-0.4%
-1.0%
-1.2%
-1.2%
-0.8%
-0.8%
-0.8%
-1.3%
-1.0%
-1.1%
-0.9%
-0.8%
-0.9%
-1.0%
-1.0%
-1.0%
-0.9%
-1.3%
-1.1%

Century Communities, Inc. · CCS

6.9%
8.5%
7.4%
8.2%
6.2%
4.0%
1.4%
2.3%
3.5%
3.9%
2.8%
3.3%
3.3%
3.2%
1.6%
1.4%
1.6%
3.1%
0.9%
1.3%

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX

0.0%
1.3%
1.4%
1.3%
1.3%
1.3%
1.4%
1.4%
1.4%
1.3%
1.6%
1.4%
1.4%
1.3%
1.6%
1.3%
1.3%
1.4%
1.4%
1.4%

Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH

-0.4%
1.8%
-1.3%
-0.4%
-0.2%
-0.2%
-0.4%
-0.1%
0.4%
1.0%
-0.3%
0.9%
0.0%
1.7%
-0.2%
-0.4%
-0.3%
0.6%
-0.3%
-0.2%

Forestar Group Inc. · FOR

3.4%
3.1%
3.7%
2.8%
3.6%
1.3%
1.8%
3.0%
4.4%
2.2%
2.6%
2.0%
4.5%
0.8%
1.7%
1.7%
4.3%
0.7%
1.6%
1.7%

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH

0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
1.6%
0.7%
1.2%
0.3%
2.0%
2.4%
3.1%
0.6%
0.8%
2.2%
0.3%
0.6%

Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA

0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
1.5%
1.4%
1.5%
-14%
1.6%
0.9%
0.8%
1.0%
0.9%
1.1%
1.2%
1.3%

Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC

16%
12%
29%
32%
33%
35%
19%
16%
8.4%
10%
14%
9.8%
5.4%
4.4%
4.6%
3.6%
1.1%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

AMREP Corporation · AXR

+0.9 pp
+0.1 pp
−1.7 pp
−16.4 pp
−0.8 pp
−3.7 pp
+0.4 pp
+4.8 pp
+2.3 pp
+1.6 pp
+0.5 pp
−1.2 pp
+0.5 pp
−1.7 pp
+1.9 pp

Belpointe PREP, LLC · OZ

−0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
0.0 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.1 pp

Century Communities, Inc. · CCS

−0.7 pp
−4.5 pp
−6.0 pp
−5.9 pp
−2.7 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.0 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.7 pp
−1.2 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.7 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.7 pp
−0.1 pp

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX

+1.3 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
0.0 pp
+0.2 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.1 pp

Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH

+0.2 pp
−2.0 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.1 pp
+1.0 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.1 pp
−1.3 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.2 pp

Forestar Group Inc. · FOR

+0.2 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.9 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.8 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.1 pp
−1.4 pp
−0.9 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.1 pp
0.0 pp

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH

+1.8 pp
+1.6 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.4 pp
+1.7 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.3 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.2 pp
−2.8 pp
0.0 pp

Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA

+1.4 pp
+1.5 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.7 pp
+14.6 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.3 pp

Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC

+13.7 pp
+19.4 pp
−10.0 pp
−15.3 pp
−24.3 pp
−24.7 pp
−5.5 pp
−6.4 pp
−3.0 pp
−5.9 pp
−9.3 pp
−6.2 pp
−4.3 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

AMREP Corporation has the lowest PEG among the 10 Real Estate - Development companies compared here, at 0.22×. Five Point Holdings, LLC has the lowest P/E at 7.42×, so level and change sit with different companies. 1 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: AMREP Corporation has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.22×. Only 1 of 10 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderAMREP Corporation · 0.22×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/10 companies · 18 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
Valuation · company comparison
1/10 level · 9/10 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Century Communities, Inc. CCS1.015.7Jun 2026
Forestar Group Inc. FOR0.49.5Jun 2026
Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. VTMX0.47.5Jun 2026
AMREP Corporation AXR0.28.7Mar 2026
Five Point Holdings, LLC FPH0.17.4Jun 2026
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. HHH31.0Mar 2026
Sky Harbour Group Corporation SKYH240.8Mar 2026
Smith Douglas Homes Corp. SDHC13.5Mar 2026
Logistic Properties of the Americas LPA33.0Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

AMREP Corporation · AXR

0.1
0.2

Century Communities, Inc. · CCS

0.3
0.2
1.0

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX

0.3
0.6
0.2
1.1
0.4

Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH

0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1

Forestar Group Inc. · FOR

0.6
0.2
0.3
0.4

P/E · reported quarter history

AMREP Corporation · AXR

12.1
9.6
9.2
5.8
6.0
4.7
2.4
3.4
4.5
4.7
48.5
16.2
14.5
13.2
12.6
9.5
9.0
11.0
8.7

Century Communities, Inc. · CCS

4.9
5.7
3.4
2.6
2.4
3.1
5.0
8.0
8.7
11.3
10.7
8.2
10.3
7.1
7.0
6.9
9.3
12.2
12.9
15.7

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. · VTMX

7.4
7.1
9.6
7.5
5.9
6.0
10.1
20.1
121.7
496.3
10.9
8.7
7.5

Five Point Holdings, LLC · FPH

72.7
8.3
5.8
4.0
3.7
4.1
5.9
3.9
4.3
5.1
4.7
5.8
7.9
7.4

Forestar Group Inc. · FOR

8.3
8.3
6.0
4.0
3.1
4.8
5.6
7.8
8.1
9.0
10.0
8.3
8.1
7.3
6.4
6.3
8.1
7.5
7.5
9.5

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. · HHH

94.2
14.6
31.2
27.3
19.4
12.6
14.4
15.6
36.1
31.0

Logistic Properties of the Americas · LPA

15.4
29.7
20.3
8.3
33.0

Sky Harbour Group Corporation · SKYH

59.8
99.7
240.8

Smith Douglas Homes Corp. · SDHC

2.3
1.9
3.0
14.2
11.2
12.1
14.0
14.1
13.5
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Real Estate - Development comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 10 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 10 Real Estate - Development companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Real Estate - Development company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Real Estate - Development comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 10 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Real Estate - Development sector outperforming S&P 500?

Real Estate - Development has underperformed S&P 500 by 18.6% over 52 weeks and 0.1% over 13 weeks. 2 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 4 of 10 beat the sector itself.

Which Real Estate - Development company is largest by revenue?

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. leads with revenue of $1,511 million, based on 6 of 10 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Real Estate - Development company is growing fastest?

Belpointe PREP, LLC has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 6 of 10 comparable companies.

Which Real Estate - Development company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

AMREP Corporation ranks first at 59.9/100 with 75.1% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Real Estate - Development company has the lowest comparable PEG?

AMREP Corporation has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.22, among 1 of 10 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Real Estate - Development comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Real Estate - Development company is the biggest?

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $1,511 million, ahead of Smith Douglas Homes Corp. at $952 million. That covers 6 of 10 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Real Estate - Development company has the best profit margins?

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V. has the highest operating margin at 77.6%, from 9 of 10 comparable companies. Belpointe PREP, LLC shows the biggest recent improvement, at +125.5 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Real Estate - Development company makes the most profit?

Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. earns the most, at $120 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 6 of 10 comparable companies. AMREP Corporation has the fastest profit growth at 16.7%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Real Estate - Development company earns the highest return on capital?

AMREP Corporation leads on return on capital employed at 2.3%, across 9 of 10 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Real Estate - Development stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — AMREP Corporation screens cheapest at 0.22×. Only 1 of 10 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Real Estate - Development sector beating the market?

Real Estate - Development has underperformed S&P 500 by 18.6% over the last 52 weeks and 0.1% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 2 of 10 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Real Estate - Development stock has the strongest price momentum?

Sky Harbour Group Corporation has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Real Estate - Development company scores highest for research priority?

AMREP Corporation scores 59.9 out of 100 with 75.1% evidence confidence, from 21.5 points on growth and earnings, 15.7 on capital efficiency, 15.7 on valuation and 7 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Real Estate - Development companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 10 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Real Estate - Development sector?

The 10 Real Estate - Development companies on this page carry $13,250 million of combined market value. Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is the largest at $3,882 million, about 29% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.

What is the Real Estate - Development sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 10 Real Estate - Development companies on this page is 13.5×, measured on the 9 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.

How is the Real Estate - Development sector performing?

2 of the 10 covered Real Estate - Development companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 18.6% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.

How many Real Estate - Development stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 10 listed Real Estate - Development companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI