Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-04
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Pollution & Treatment Controls Stocks

Pollution & Treatment Controls: CECO Environmental Corp. owns the largest revenue base; CleanCore Solutions, Inc. has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Pollution & Treatment Controls moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 10% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 18% on average over the last four reported quarters.

BASING · +-1 joined~Moving with the index2 of 6 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 4/6 >200d (+2) · 2/6 lead (−1) · EPS 3/6↑

20020262025202420232022 416348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100181Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Jun 25Dec 25Jun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · down 14.3% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 147, against 100 at the start · up 38.1% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 144, against 100 at the start · down 11.9% on a year ago · 3 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 137, against 100 at the start · up 83.3% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 136, against 100 at the start · up 45.2% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 138, against 100 at the start · up 9.6% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 147, against 100 at the start · up 4.5% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 163, against 100 at the start · up 27.5% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 181, against 100 at the start · up 27.9% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 172, against 100 at the start · up 12.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingJun 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingSep 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingDec 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingMar 2023 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingMar 2025 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingMar 2026 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or twoNOT REPORTED YET172 · Dec 25No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
20020262025202420232022 416348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100181Sep 23Sep 24Dec 25Jun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · down 14.3% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 147, against 100 at the start · up 38.1% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 144, against 100 at the start · down 11.9% on a year ago · 3 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 137, against 100 at the start · up 83.3% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 136, against 100 at the start · up 45.2% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 138, against 100 at the start · up 9.6% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 147, against 100 at the start · up 4.5% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 163, against 100 at the start · up 27.5% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 181, against 100 at the start · up 27.9% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 172, against 100 at the start · up 12.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingJun 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingSep 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingDec 2022 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingMar 2023 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingMar 2025 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingMar 2026 · too few reporting — 2 of the Pollution & Treatment Controls filed a comparable quarter, and three is the floor for a readingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two172No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Pollution & Treatment Controls, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 6 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Pollution & Treatment Controls outperforming S&P 500?

Pollution & Treatment Controls has underperformed S&P 500 by 16.3% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 8.6%. 2 of 7 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +5.7%.

+8.6%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
-16.3%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
2/7Stocks leading S&P 500
1/7Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Pollution & Treatment Controls has underperformed S&P 500 by 16.3% over 52 weeks and 8.6% over 13 weeks. 2 of 7 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 7 beat the sector itself. CECO Environmental Corp. leads with revenue of $804 million, based on 4 of 7 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Companies
7
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$39.0B
Veralto Corporation
Revenue growing
2/3
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
2/7
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 4 of 7
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 52.5% evidence confidence.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Zurn Elkay Water Solutions CorporationZWS 57.6/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence ASLEEP 21.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.7 pp 39% evidence 17.0/25 ROCE 6.3% · OPM 19% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E 31.2× · PEG — 0% evidence 9.2/20 RS sector -2.6% · RS bench 0% · 1Y 20.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.4 + 17 + 10 + 9.2 = 57.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
2Veralto CorporationVLTO 53.7/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence TURNING 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.4 pp 32% evidence 16.8/25 ROCE 5.1% · OPM 23.8% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E 23.4× · PEG — 0% evidence 9.6/20 RS sector -11.9% · RS bench -10.1% · 1Y -10.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.3 + 16.8 + 10 + 9.6 = 53.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3CECO Environmental Corp.CECO 42.6/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence FADING 14.1/35 Revenue 31.8% · PAT -65.3% · OPM change -34.1 pp 53% evidence 11.3/25 ROCE 0.3% · OPM 0.9% 57% evidence 10.0/20 P/E 161× · PEG — 0% evidence 7.2/20 RS sector -3.8% · RS bench -0.8% · 1Y 60%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.1 + 11.3 + 10 + 7.2 = 42.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Energy Recovery, Inc.ERII 36.5/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence BASING 15.2/35 Revenue -2.8% · PAT 5% · OPM change 2.7 pp 40% evidence 8.4/25 ROCE -7.5% · OPM -153.1% 57% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 26.5× · PEG 1.82 50% evidence 3.5/20 RS sector -35.5% · RS bench -34.4% · 1Y -35.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.2 + 8.4 + 9.4 + 3.5 = 36.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Aduro Clean Technologies Inc.ADUR 55.4/100Thin evidence · provisional34% evidence TURNING 20.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3610.8 pp 24% evidence 7.9/25 ROCE -36.3% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 17.0/20 RS sector 5.7% · RS bench 7.5% · 1Y 35.3%10 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 20.5 + 7.9 + 10 + 17 = 55.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6PureCycle Technologies, Inc.PCT 44.8/100Thin evidence · provisional34% evidence ASLEEP 18.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1374.7 pp 24% evidence 10.2/25 ROCE -5.6% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 6.0/20 RS sector -32.2% · RS bench -32.5% · 1Y -41.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18.6 + 10.2 + 10 + 6 = 44.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7CleanCore Solutions, Inc.ZONE 35.4/100Thin evidence · provisional39% evidence 14.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change -3362.4 pp 40% evidence 7.0/25 ROCE -59.2% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 4.0/20 RS sector -32.5% · RS bench -42.5% · 1Y -82.6%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 14.4 + 7 + 10 + 4 = 35.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
04 · what price has already done

Market action

CECO Environmental Corp. has the strongest one-year price move in Pollution & Treatment Controls at +60%. Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +7.5%. 2 of 7 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

CECO Environmental Corp. has the highest Revenue among the 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies compared here, at $804 million. Energy Recovery, Inc. is next at $137 million. CleanCore Solutions, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: CECO Environmental Corp. is the scale leader at $804 million, 486.9% ahead of Energy Recovery, Inc.. CleanCore Solutions, Inc.'s growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap from a $4 million base, with 13 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderCECO Environmental Corp. · $804 million
Gap486.9% versus #2 · Energy Recovery, Inc.
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/7 companies · 98 observations

Investor read: CECO Environmental Corp. is the scale benchmark; CleanCore Solutions, Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: CECO Environmental Corp.'s growth falls below CleanCore Solutions, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1CECO Environmental Corp. CECO · older report$804M
2Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII · older report$137M
3PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCT · older report$11M
4CleanCore Solutions, Inc. ZONE · older report$4M
Revenue growthfastest growers
1CleanCore Solutions, Inc. ZONE · older report100%
2CECO Environmental Corp. CECO · older report32%
3Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII · older report-2.8%
Revenue · company comparison
4/7 level · 3/7 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Veralto Corporation VLTO$1.4B6.8%Sep 2026
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation ZWS$433M11%Jun 2026
CECO Environmental Corp. CECO$206M16%Mar 2026
Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII$10M25%Mar 2026
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCT$4M100%Mar 2026
CleanCore Solutions, Inc. ZONE$1M0.0%Mar 2026
Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. ADUR$0MMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. · ADUR

$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M

CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO

$94M
$92M
$105M
$108M
$116M
$113M
$129M
$149M
$154M
$126M
$138M
$136M
$159M
$177M
$185M
$198M
$215M
$206M

CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE

$3M
$1M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$1M
$0M
$0M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M

Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII

$34M
$33M
$20M
$30M
$42M
$13M
$21M
$37M
$57M
$12M
$27M
$39M
$67M
$8M
$28M
$32M
$67M
$10M

PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT

$2M
$2M
$2M
$3M
$4M

Veralto Corporation · VLTO

$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.2B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.3B
$1.4B
$1.4B
$1.4B

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS

$232M
$240M
$284M
$418M
$340M
$372M
$403M
$398M
$357M
$374M
$412M
$410M
$371M
$389M
$445M
$455M
$407M
$433M

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO

33%
35%
23%
23%
23%
38%
33%
12%
7.0%
-8.7%
3.3%
40%
34%
46%
35%
16%

CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE

-100%
0.0%
0.0%

Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII

-4.8%
43%
24%
-61%
5.0%
23%
36%
-7.7%
29%
5.4%
18%
-33%
3.7%
-18%
0.0%
25%

PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT

100%

Veralto Corporation · VLTO

3.0%
3.2%
1.7%
2.8%
4.7%
4.4%
3.4%
4.3%
4.4%
6.8%

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS

16%
82%
47%
55%
42%
-4.8%
5.0%
0.5%
2.2%
3.0%
3.9%
4.0%
8.0%
11%
9.7%
11%
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Veralto Corporation has the highest OPM among the 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies compared here, at 23.8%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation is next at 19%. Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. has the highest Margin change at +3610.8 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its OPM series carries 14 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Veralto Corporation leads opm at 23.8%; Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. leads margin change at +3610.8 percentage points.

LeaderVeralto Corporation · 23.8%
Gap25.3% versus #2 · Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/7 companies · 79 observations

Investor read: Veralto Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
3CECO Environmental Corp. CECO · older report0.9%
4Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII · older report-153%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. ADUR · older report+3,610.8 pp
2PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCT · older report+1,374.7 pp
3Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII · older report+2.7 pp
5Veralto Corporation VLTO−0.4 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
4/7 level · 7/7 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Veralto Corporation VLTO24%−0.4 ppSep 2026
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation ZWS19%+2.7 ppJun 2026
CECO Environmental Corp. CECO0.9%−34.1 ppMar 2026
Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII-153%+2.7 ppMar 2026
CleanCore Solutions, Inc. ZONE-911%−3,362.4 ppMar 2026
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCT+1,374.7 ppMar 2026
Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. ADUR+3,610.8 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO

5.6%
5.6%
5.5%
2.6%
7.2%
4.9%
6.7%
5.3%
8.2%
6.1%
6.7%
5.3%
7.1%
35%
9.7%
4.8%
7.7%
0.9%

CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE

-10%
-41%
-116%
-99%
-139%
-124%
-224%
-375%
-129%
-436%
-911%

Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII

18%
25%
-14%
16%
35%
-61%
-13%
25%
36%
-90%
-7.4%
18%
38%
-156%
5.3%
11%
47%
-153%

Veralto Corporation · VLTO

23%
24%
24%
23%
22%
22%
24%
23%
23%
23%
24%
23%
23%
24%

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS

5.7%
18%
19%
-2.4%
5.8%
12%
14%
15%
9.2%
14%
18%
17%
13%
16%
18%
17%
15%
19%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. · ADUR

+1,209.8 pp
+1,384.0 pp
−1,790.0 pp
−5,217.3 pp
−2,889.9 pp
−2,654.9 pp
−6,591.8 pp
+3,610.8 pp

CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO

+2.8 pp
+3.3 pp
+1.6 pp
−0.7 pp
+1.2 pp
+2.7 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.2 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.1 pp
+28.9 pp
+3.0 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.6 pp
−34.1 pp

CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE

−98.6 pp
−108.3 pp
−275.3 pp
+10.6 pp
−311.5 pp
−686.7 pp
−1,563.6 pp
−3,362.4 pp

Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII

−15.7 pp
+9.2 pp
+16.7 pp
−85.8 pp
+1.8 pp
+8.6 pp
+1.5 pp
−29.9 pp
+5.1 pp
−6.4 pp
+2.2 pp
−65.4 pp
+12.7 pp
−6.9 pp
+8.6 pp
+2.7 pp

PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT

+1,374.7 pp

Veralto Corporation · VLTO

−1.6 pp
−1.4 pp
−0.3 pp
+0.1 pp
+1.6 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.0 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.4 pp

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS

+3.5 pp
−16.5 pp
+0.1 pp
−6.6 pp
−5.2 pp
+17.5 pp
+3.4 pp
+2.5 pp
+3.9 pp
+2.0 pp
+4.1 pp
+2.1 pp
0.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+1.5 pp
+2.7 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Energy Recovery, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies compared here, at $21 million. CECO Environmental Corp. is next at $17 million. CECO Environmental Corp. has the highest Profit growth at -65.3%, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Energy Recovery, Inc. leads with $21 million of TTM profit, 23.5% above CECO Environmental Corp.. CECO Environmental Corp. shows -65.3% growth from a $17 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderEnergy Recovery, Inc. · $21 million
Gap23.5% versus #2 · CECO Environmental Corp.
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/7 companies · 117 observations

Investor read: Energy Recovery, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII · older report$21M
2CECO Environmental Corp. CECO · older report$17M
3Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. ADUR · older report$-18M
4CleanCore Solutions, Inc. ZONE · older report$-158M
5PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCT · older report$-224M
Profit growthfastest growers
1CECO Environmental Corp. CECO · older report-65%
Net profit · company comparison
5/7 level · 1/7 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Veralto Corporation VLTO$254M13%Sep 2026
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation ZWS$59M44%Jun 2026
CECO Environmental Corp. CECO$0M-100%Mar 2026
Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. ADUR$-2MMar 2026
Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII$-12M17%Mar 2026
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCT$-33M-467%Mar 2026
CleanCore Solutions, Inc. ZONE$-37MMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. · ADUR

$-1M
$-1M
$-1M
$-1M
$-1M
$-2M
$-2M
$-2M
$-2M
$-2M
$-2M
$-2M
$-3M
$-3M
$-4M
$-6M
$-6M
$-2M

CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO

$2M
$3M
$5M
$2M
$9M
$2M
$4M
$4M
$4M
$2M
$5M
$3M
$5M
$36M
$10M
$2M
$5M
$0M

CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE

$-1M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$-1M
$-1M
$-1M
$-1M
$-1M
$-4M
$-13M
$-104M
$-37M

Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII

$5M
$8M
$-2M
$5M
$14M
$-6M
$-2M
$10M
$20M
$-8M
$-1M
$8M
$23M
$-10M
$2M
$4M
$27M
$-12M

PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT

$-19M
$-25M
$-15M
$-35M
$-9M
$-26M
$-55M
$9M
$-29M
$-86M
$-48M
$-91M
$-65M
$9M
$-144M
$-28M
$-19M
$-33M

Veralto Corporation · VLTO

$218M
$216M
$225M
$209M
$205M
$200M
$184M
$203M
$219M
$227M
$225M
$222M
$239M
$254M

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS

$3M
$29M
$36M
$-19M
$10M
$23M
$33M
$35M
$14M
$34M
$45M
$44M
$36M
$41M
$50M
$60M
$42M
$59M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO

350%
-33%
-20%
100%
-56%
0.0%
25%
-25%
25%
1,700%
100%
-33%
0.0%
-100%

Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII

-300%
400%
180%
-175%
100%
43%
-20%
15%
-50%
17%

PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT

-1,111%
-467%

Veralto Corporation · VLTO

-6.0%
-7.4%
-18%
-2.9%
6.8%
14%
11%
1.4%
5.3%
13%

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS

71%
-219%
233%
-21%
-8.3%
40%
48%
36%
26%
157%
21%
11%
36%
17%
44%
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation has the highest ROCE among the 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies compared here, at 6.3%. Veralto Corporation is next at 5.1%. Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +43.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its ROCE series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation leads ROCE at 6.3%, 1.2 percentage points above Veralto Corporation. Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +43.6 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderZurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · 6.3%
Gap23.5% versus #2 · Veralto Corporation
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/7 companies · 119 observations

Investor read: Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
3CECO Environmental Corp. CECO · older report0.3%
4PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCT · older report-5.6%
5Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII · older report-7.5%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. ADUR · older report+43.6 pp
3PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCT · older report−0.2 pp
4Veralto Corporation VLTO−0.8 pp
5Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII · older report−1.7 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
7/7 level · 7/7 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation ZWS6.3%+3.1 ppJun 2026
Veralto Corporation VLTO5.1%−0.8 ppSep 2026
CECO Environmental Corp. CECO0.3%−11.3 ppMar 2026
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCT-5.6%−0.2 ppMar 2026
Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII-7.5%−1.7 ppMar 2026
Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. ADUR-36%+43.6 ppMar 2026
CleanCore Solutions, Inc. ZONE-59%−28.3 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. · ADUR

-303%
-424%
-187%
-134%
-128%
-168%
-83%
-103%
-125%
-126%
-115%
-84%
-73%
-80%
-96%
-65%
-79%
-36%

CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO

1.7%
1.6%
1.8%
0.9%
2.6%
1.5%
2.4%
2.1%
3.4%
1.9%
2.4%
1.8%
2.5%
12%
3.7%
1.9%
3.0%
0.3%

CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE

0.0%
4.5%
8.4%
0.0%
-43%
-36%
-83%
-29%
-24%
-34%
-31%
-67%
-9.3%
-42%
-59%

Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII

3.1%
4.1%
-1.6%
2.6%
7.1%
-4.2%
-1.4%
4.7%
9.2%
-5.2%
-1.0%
3.1%
11%
-5.8%
0.7%
1.7%
14%
-7.5%

PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT

-4.4%
-2.5%
-2.6%
-2.9%
-2.9%
-2.6%
-3.1%
-3.4%
-3.8%
-5.2%
-5.3%
-3.6%
-4.2%
-5.4%
-5.8%
-4.9%
-5.7%
-5.6%

Veralto Corporation · VLTO

15%
16%
7.0%
7.0%
13%
13%
6.7%
6.4%
6.4%
5.9%
6.3%
6.1%
5.1%

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS

0.7%
2.2%
2.6%
-0.3%
1.2%
2.5%
3.1%
2.3%
1.3%
2.1%
2.9%
2.8%
2.0%
2.6%
3.2%
3.2%
2.5%
3.4%
6.3%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. · ADUR

+175.3 pp
+256.6 pp
+104.7 pp
+31.7 pp
+3.4 pp
+41.3 pp
−32.1 pp
+18.7 pp
+51.9 pp
+46.3 pp
+18.4 pp
+18.9 pp
−5.8 pp
+43.6 pp

CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO

+0.9 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.4 pp
0.0 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.9 pp
+9.7 pp
+1.3 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.5 pp
−11.3 pp

CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE

+8.4 pp
−4.5 pp
−91.7 pp
−29.4 pp
+19.5 pp
+2.1 pp
+52.4 pp
−37.7 pp
+14.2 pp
−8.2 pp
−28.3 pp

Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII

+4.0 pp
−8.3 pp
+0.2 pp
+2.1 pp
+2.1 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.4 pp
−1.6 pp
+2.2 pp
−0.6 pp
+1.7 pp
−1.4 pp
+3.0 pp
−1.7 pp

PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT

+1.5 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.5 pp
−0.9 pp
−2.6 pp
−2.2 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.5 pp
−1.3 pp
−1.5 pp
−0.2 pp

Veralto Corporation · VLTO

−8.4 pp
−8.9 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.6 pp
−6.3 pp
−0.8 pp
−0.1 pp
−0.3 pp
−0.8 pp

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS

+0.5 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.5 pp
+2.6 pp
+0.1 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.2 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.5 pp
+0.8 pp
+3.1 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Energy Recovery, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies compared here, at 1.82×. Veralto Corporation has the lowest P/E at 23.4×, so level and change sit with different companies. 1 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Energy Recovery, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 1.82×. Only 1 of 7 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderEnergy Recovery, Inc. · 1.82×
GapNot enough peers
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/7 companies · 12 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
1Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII · older report1.8
P/Elowest P/E
2Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII · older report26.5
4CECO Environmental Corp. CECO · older report161.0
Valuation · company comparison
1/7 level · 4/7 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII1.826.5Mar 2026
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation ZWS1.431.2Jun 2026
Veralto Corporation VLTO23.4Sep 2026
CECO Environmental Corp. CECO161.0Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII

2.0
3.4
1.8

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS

1.3
1.5
1.3
0.8
0.7
0.9
1.0
1.5
1.4

P/E · reported quarter history

CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO

155.8
68.6
29.9
29.5
23.4
28.6
28.4
31.9
54.8
65.8
80.1
85.5
84.0
17.7
19.8
36.3
43.7
161.0

Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII

89.5
74.6
92.5
80.5
48.8
135.6
155.3
78.6
50.9
46.4
36.9
51.2
36.8
43.0
30.4
45.4
32.1
26.5

Veralto Corporation · VLTO

24.4
24.2
27.5
29.9
34.0
30.5
25.4
29.0
29.4
22.7
23.4

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS

91.0
38.1
26.2
58.3
57.2
59.3
99.6
48.3
46.0
50.7
40.3
46.1
40.5
33.7
36.2
42.0
40.4
36.2
31.2
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Pollution & Treatment Controls comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 5 of the 7 companies report on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so their ranks are marked stale. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 5 companies have older fundamental reporting dates than the sector’s freshest reporters; their ranks carry a stale marker.
  • Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Sep 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Pollution & Treatment Controls company comparison FAQs

These 21 answers restate the Pollution & Treatment Controls comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 7 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Pollution & Treatment Controls sector outperforming S&P 500?

Pollution & Treatment Controls has underperformed S&P 500 by 16.3% over 52 weeks and 8.6% over 13 weeks. 2 of 7 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 7 beat the sector itself.

Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company is largest by revenue?

CECO Environmental Corp. leads with revenue of $804 million, based on 4 of 7 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company is growing fastest?

CleanCore Solutions, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 3 of 7 comparable companies.

Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation ranks first at 57.6/100 with 52.5% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Energy Recovery, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 1.82, among 1 of 7 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Pollution & Treatment Controls comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Sep 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company is the biggest?

CECO Environmental Corp. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $804 million, ahead of Energy Recovery, Inc. at $137 million. That covers 4 of 7 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company has the best profit margins?

Veralto Corporation has the highest operating margin at 23.8%, from 4 of 7 comparable companies. Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +3610.8 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company makes the most profit?

Energy Recovery, Inc. earns the most, at $21 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 5 of 7 comparable companies. CECO Environmental Corp. has the fastest profit growth at -65.3%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company earns the highest return on capital?

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation leads on return on capital employed at 6.3%, across 7 of 7 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Pollution & Treatment Controls stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Energy Recovery, Inc. screens cheapest at 1.82×. Only 1 of 7 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Pollution & Treatment Controls sector beating the market?

Pollution & Treatment Controls has underperformed S&P 500 by 16.3% over the last 52 weeks and 8.6% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 2 of 7 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Pollution & Treatment Controls stock has the strongest price momentum?

Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company scores highest for research priority?

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation scores 57.6 out of 100 with 52.5% evidence confidence, from 21.4 points on growth and earnings, 17 on capital efficiency, 10 on valuation and 9.2 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Pollution & Treatment Controls companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 7 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Sep 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Pollution & Treatment Controls sector?

The 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies on this page carry $38,959 million of combined market value. Veralto Corporation is the largest at $23,514 million, about 60% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.

How is the Pollution & Treatment Controls sector performing?

2 of the 7 covered Pollution & Treatment Controls companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 16.3% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.

How many Pollution & Treatment Controls stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 7 listed Pollution & Treatment Controls companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Sep 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI