Pollution & Treatment Controls Stocks
Pollution & Treatment Controls: CECO Environmental Corp. owns the largest revenue base; CleanCore Solutions, Inc. has the fastest current growth.
How has Pollution & Treatment Controls moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 10% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 18% on average over the last four reported quarters.
RS — · 4/6 >200d (+2) · 2/6 lead (−1) · EPS 3/6↑
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 6 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Is Pollution & Treatment Controls outperforming S&P 500?
Pollution & Treatment Controls has underperformed S&P 500 by 16.3% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 8.6%. 2 of 7 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +5.7%.
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Pollution & Treatment Controls has underperformed S&P 500 by 16.3% over 52 weeks and 8.6% over 13 weeks. 2 of 7 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 7 beat the sector itself. CECO Environmental Corp. leads with revenue of $804 million, based on 4 of 7 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Zurn Elkay Water Solutions CorporationZWS | 57.6/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | ASLEEP | 21.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2.7 pp 39% evidence | 17.0/25 ROCE 6.3% · OPM 19% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 31.2× · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.2/20 RS sector -2.6% · RS bench 0% · 1Y 20.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 17 + 10 + 9.2 = 57.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 2Veralto CorporationVLTO | 53.7/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | TURNING | 17.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.4 pp 32% evidence | 16.8/25 ROCE 5.1% · OPM 23.8% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 23.4× · PEG — 0% evidence | 9.6/20 RS sector -11.9% · RS bench -10.1% · 1Y -10.4%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.3 + 16.8 + 10 + 9.6 = 53.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3CECO Environmental Corp.CECO | 42.6/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | FADING | 14.1/35 Revenue 31.8% · PAT -65.3% · OPM change -34.1 pp 53% evidence | 11.3/25 ROCE 0.3% · OPM 0.9% 57% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 161× · PEG — 0% evidence | 7.2/20 RS sector -3.8% · RS bench -0.8% · 1Y 60%9 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 14.1 + 11.3 + 10 + 7.2 = 42.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4Energy Recovery, Inc.ERII | 36.5/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | BASING | 15.2/35 Revenue -2.8% · PAT 5% · OPM change 2.7 pp 40% evidence | 8.4/25 ROCE -7.5% · OPM -153.1% 57% evidence | 9.4/20 P/E 26.5× · PEG 1.82 50% evidence | 3.5/20 RS sector -35.5% · RS bench -34.4% · 1Y -35.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.2 + 8.4 + 9.4 + 3.5 = 36.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Aduro Clean Technologies Inc.ADUR | 55.4/100Thin evidence · provisional34% evidence | TURNING | 20.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 3610.8 pp 24% evidence | 7.9/25 ROCE -36.3% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 5.7% · RS bench 7.5% · 1Y 35.3%10 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 20.5 + 7.9 + 10 + 17 = 55.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6PureCycle Technologies, Inc.PCT | 44.8/100Thin evidence · provisional34% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1374.7 pp 24% evidence | 10.2/25 ROCE -5.6% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -32.2% · RS bench -32.5% · 1Y -41.5%8 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.6 + 10.2 + 10 + 6 = 44.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7CleanCore Solutions, Inc.ZONE | 35.4/100Thin evidence · provisional39% evidence | 14.4/35 Revenue 100% · PAT — · OPM change -3362.4 pp 40% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE -59.2% · OPM — 46% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -32.5% · RS bench -42.5% · 1Y -82.6%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 14.4 + 7 + 10 + 4 = 35.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Market action
CECO Environmental Corp. has the strongest one-year price move in Pollution & Treatment Controls at +60%. Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +7.5%. 2 of 7 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Pollution & Treatment Controls itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
CECO Environmental Corp. has the highest Revenue among the 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies compared here, at $804 million. Energy Recovery, Inc. is next at $137 million. CleanCore Solutions, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: CECO Environmental Corp. is the scale leader at $804 million, 486.9% ahead of Energy Recovery, Inc.. CleanCore Solutions, Inc.'s growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap from a $4 million base, with 13 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
Investor read: CECO Environmental Corp. is the scale benchmark; CleanCore Solutions, Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: CECO Environmental Corp.'s growth falls below CleanCore Solutions, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veralto Corporation VLTO | $1.4B | 6.8% | Sep 2026 |
| Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation ZWS | $433M | 11% | Jun 2026 |
| CECO Environmental Corp. CECO | $206M | 16% | Mar 2026 |
| Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII | $10M | 25% | Mar 2026 |
| PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCT | $4M | 100% | Mar 2026 |
| CleanCore Solutions, Inc. ZONE | $1M | 0.0% | Mar 2026 |
| Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. ADUR | $0M | — | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO
CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE
Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT
Veralto Corporation · VLTO
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO
CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE
Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT
Veralto Corporation · VLTO
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
Veralto Corporation has the highest OPM among the 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies compared here, at 23.8%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation is next at 19%. Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. has the highest Margin change at +3610.8 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its OPM series carries 14 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Veralto Corporation leads opm at 23.8%; Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. leads margin change at +3610.8 percentage points.
Investor read: Veralto Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veralto Corporation VLTO | 24% | −0.4 pp | Sep 2026 |
| Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation ZWS | 19% | +2.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| CECO Environmental Corp. CECO | 0.9% | −34.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII | -153% | +2.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| CleanCore Solutions, Inc. ZONE | -911% | −3,362.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCT | — | +1,374.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. ADUR | — | +3,610.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO
CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE
Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII
Veralto Corporation · VLTO
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS
Margin change · reported quarter history
Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. · ADUR
CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO
CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE
Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT
Veralto Corporation · VLTO
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Energy Recovery, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies compared here, at $21 million. CECO Environmental Corp. is next at $17 million. CECO Environmental Corp. has the highest Profit growth at -65.3%, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Energy Recovery, Inc. leads with $21 million of TTM profit, 23.5% above CECO Environmental Corp.. CECO Environmental Corp. shows -65.3% growth from a $17 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
Investor read: Energy Recovery, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Veralto Corporation VLTO | $254M | 13% | Sep 2026 |
| Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation ZWS | $59M | 44% | Jun 2026 |
| CECO Environmental Corp. CECO | $0M | -100% | Mar 2026 |
| Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. ADUR | $-2M | — | Mar 2026 |
| Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII | $-12M | 17% | Mar 2026 |
| PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCT | $-33M | -467% | Mar 2026 |
| CleanCore Solutions, Inc. ZONE | $-37M | — | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. · ADUR
CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO
CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE
Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT
Veralto Corporation · VLTO
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS
Profit growth · reported quarter history
CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO
Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT
Veralto Corporation · VLTO
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS
Return On Capital Employed
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation has the highest ROCE among the 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies compared here, at 6.3%. Veralto Corporation is next at 5.1%. Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +43.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its ROCE series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation leads ROCE at 6.3%, 1.2 percentage points above Veralto Corporation. Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +43.6 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
Investor read: Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation ZWS | 6.3% | +3.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Veralto Corporation VLTO | 5.1% | −0.8 pp | Sep 2026 |
| CECO Environmental Corp. CECO | 0.3% | −11.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCT | -5.6% | −0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII | -7.5% | −1.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. ADUR | -36% | +43.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| CleanCore Solutions, Inc. ZONE | -59% | −28.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. · ADUR
CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO
CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE
Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT
Veralto Corporation · VLTO
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. · ADUR
CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO
CleanCore Solutions, Inc. · ZONE
Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. · PCT
Veralto Corporation · VLTO
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
Energy Recovery, Inc. has the lowest PEG among the 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies compared here, at 1.82×. Veralto Corporation has the lowest P/E at 23.4×, so level and change sit with different companies. 1 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Energy Recovery, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 1.82×. Only 1 of 7 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Recovery, Inc. ERII | 1.8 | 26.5 | Mar 2026 |
| Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation ZWS | 1.4 | 31.2 | Jun 2026 |
| Veralto Corporation VLTO | — | 23.4 | Sep 2026 |
| CECO Environmental Corp. CECO | — | 161.0 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS
P/E · reported quarter history
CECO Environmental Corp. · CECO
Energy Recovery, Inc. · ERII
Veralto Corporation · VLTO
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation · ZWS
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Pollution & Treatment Controls comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 5 of the 7 companies report on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so their ranks are marked stale. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 5 companies have older fundamental reporting dates than the sector’s freshest reporters; their ranks carry a stale marker.
- Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
Pollution & Treatment Controls company comparison FAQs
These 21 answers restate the Pollution & Treatment Controls comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 7 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Pollution & Treatment Controls sector outperforming S&P 500?
Pollution & Treatment Controls has underperformed S&P 500 by 16.3% over 52 weeks and 8.6% over 13 weeks. 2 of 7 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 7 beat the sector itself.
Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company is largest by revenue?
CECO Environmental Corp. leads with revenue of $804 million, based on 4 of 7 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company is growing fastest?
CleanCore Solutions, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 3 of 7 comparable companies.
Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation ranks first at 57.6/100 with 52.5% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Energy Recovery, Inc. has the lowest comparable PEG at 1.82, among 1 of 7 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Pollution & Treatment Controls comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Sep 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company is the biggest?
CECO Environmental Corp. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $804 million, ahead of Energy Recovery, Inc. at $137 million. That covers 4 of 7 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company has the best profit margins?
Veralto Corporation has the highest operating margin at 23.8%, from 4 of 7 comparable companies. Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +3610.8 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company makes the most profit?
Energy Recovery, Inc. earns the most, at $21 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 5 of 7 comparable companies. CECO Environmental Corp. has the fastest profit growth at -65.3%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company earns the highest return on capital?
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation leads on return on capital employed at 6.3%, across 7 of 7 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Pollution & Treatment Controls stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Energy Recovery, Inc. screens cheapest at 1.82×. Only 1 of 7 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Pollution & Treatment Controls sector beating the market?
Pollution & Treatment Controls has underperformed S&P 500 by 16.3% over the last 52 weeks and 8.6% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 2 of 7 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Pollution & Treatment Controls stock has the strongest price momentum?
Aduro Clean Technologies Inc. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Pollution & Treatment Controls company scores highest for research priority?
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation scores 57.6 out of 100 with 52.5% evidence confidence, from 21.4 points on growth and earnings, 17 on capital efficiency, 10 on valuation and 9.2 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Pollution & Treatment Controls companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 7 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Sep 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Pollution & Treatment Controls sector?
The 7 Pollution & Treatment Controls companies on this page carry $38,959 million of combined market value. Veralto Corporation is the largest at $23,514 million, about 60% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.
How is the Pollution & Treatment Controls sector performing?
2 of the 7 covered Pollution & Treatment Controls companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 16.3% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.
How many Pollution & Treatment Controls stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 7 listed Pollution & Treatment Controls companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Sep 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.