The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd
BBTCThe Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +10.7% in a year against a −21.3% price move.
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +10.7% against a −21.3% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery.
The price is in a downtrend (77 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 8th percentile of its own 10-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +33.5% year on year, and 103% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd trades at ₹1,497, in a downtrend and 77 weeks into that stage. That is −8.9% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 17% of a 52-week range of ₹1,375 to ₹2,079. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (6 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 77 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹1,497 it trades −8.9% versus its 200-day average and sits at 17% of its 52-week range (₹1,375–₹2,079).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +307% while the NIFTY 500 moved +276% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (6 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-25) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd trades at 8.8× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 8% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 15.7×, measured across 10.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 8.8× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 8% of the time, against a long-run median of 15.7× measured over 10.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
One caveat before moving on: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. If profitability mean-reverts, today's multiple is higher than it looks.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +10.7% against a −21.3% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +3.8%/yr price move, ~+26.3%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−22.5 pp from the multiple (compressing); over 10y, of the +13.9%/yr price move, ~+11.9%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+2.0 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 13% on reported income across 13 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Stage: Consistent Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd reads as consistent on its fundamental arc. Consistent — revenue and profit growth have stayed positive through the window, with ROCE at 33.0% and holding. The read is built from 10 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: steady curves with healthy returns are the compounding setup — the risk is the price, not the business.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +6.8% | +5.5% | +7.8% | +8.4% |
| Profit | +13.6% | — | +14.4% | +12.2% |
| EPS | +10.7% | — | +27.5% | +12.4% |
| Share price | −21.3% | +10.0% | +3.8% | +13.9% |
4-Factor Sector Score
48.1/100 — rank 4 of 6 in FMCG - Foods · 72% evidence confidence
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd scores 48.1 out of 100 against the 6 companies it is compared with in FMCG - Foods, ranking 4. Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 9.7 + 17.6 + 14.8 + 6 = 48.1. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd reported ₹4,818 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +6.6% year on year. That is the 10th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 8.4% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹19,539 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹19,539 Cr.
FY26 revenue came in at ₹19,539 Cr (+6.8% on the year), capping 10 years at 8.4% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹4,818 Cr, +6.6% year on year — the 10th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +6.8% growth against the decade's 8.4% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +6.8% over the last 4 quarters against +6.9%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit +13.6% vs +19.2%/yr — rolling over.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's operating margin is 17.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, −1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 9.0% to 18.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 17.0%, −1.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 9.0%–18.0%, and FY26's 18.0% is the top of that band — a record year.
🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −0.6 pp year on year while gross margin went +2.0 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd earned ₹781 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +33.5% year on year. It is the 5th consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹2,499 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 12.2%. That is 16.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹585 Cr.
Mar 26 profit was ₹781 Cr, +33.5% year on year — the 5th consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹2,499 Cr (+13.6%), and the 10-year compound rate is 12.2%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +6.6% and the margin −1.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +13.3% vs revenue +6.8%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 103% of The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹2,419 Cr of operating cash against ₹2,499 Cr of profit. After ₹238 Cr of capital spending, ₹2,181 Cr was left as free cash.
FY26: operating cash of ₹2,419 Cr against reported profit of ₹2,499 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹2,181 Cr after ₹238 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 103% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why conversion sits at 103%: the cash cycle held roughly steady between FY21 and FY26 — so conversion tracks profitability rather than the cycle.
Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs −8 days in FY26, down from 1 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹1,101 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹19,539 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹53.5 Cr, so roughly ₹−428 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY26: debtors at 10 days, inventory at 45 days — roughly 1.5 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of −8 days, tighter than FY21's 1.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 45 days to sell; customers pay about 10 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 63 days — netting out to the −8-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹19,539 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹53.5 Cr — so the −8-day loop keeps roughly ₹−428 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹1,101 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹991 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹42.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd earns a ROCE of 33% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 16% in FY22. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 12.8% net margin on 1.34× asset turns.
FY26 ROCE is 33%, recovered from a FY22 trough of 16% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 12.8% net margin × 1.34× asset turns × 2.06× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 35.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.
The quarterly return curves and the return-on-invested-capital overlay, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 13% on reported income across 13 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd carries ₹1,590 Cr of borrowings against ₹7,042 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 0.23. Operating profit covers the interest bill 25×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹2,670 Cr to ₹1,590 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹1,101 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY26: borrowings of ₹1,590 Cr against equity of ₹7,042 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.23. Operating profit covers the interest bill 25×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹2,670 Cr to ₹1,590 Cr while capital spending ran ₹1,101 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.
The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 13% on reported income across 13 comparable periods. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
No holder of The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. Domestic institutions moved −0.4 points over the same window, to 1.0%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: +0.6 points over 8 quarters to 9.5%; Domestic institutions: −0.4 points over 8 quarters to 1.0%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 74.0%.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd: the Z-score is withheld — it comes from the second data source this page could not reconcile, and a solvency score is not worth printing on a number two sources dispute. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is withheld — it comes from the second data source this page could not reconcile, and a solvency score is not worth printing on a number two sources dispute.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Britannia Industries LtdBRITANNIA | 61.0/100Mixed-positive evidence90% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.9/35 Revenue 6.7% · PAT 16.5% · OPM change 0 pp 88% evidence | 24.0/25 ROCE 56% · OPM 18% 100% evidence | 4.2/20 P/E 51.5× · PEG 4.98 100% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector 15% · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y -3.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.9 + 24 + 4.2 + 13.9 = 61 · Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression. | ||||||
| 2Tata Consumer Products LtdTATACONSUM | 51.1/100Mixed-positive evidence82% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.1/35 Revenue 15.6% · PAT 23.5% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence | 10.2/25 ROCE 9.2% · OPM 14% 76% evidence | 6.7/20 P/E 65× · PEG — 50% evidence | 11.1/20 RS sector 6.8% · RS bench -5.7% · 1Y 2.7%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.1 + 10.2 + 6.7 + 11.1 = 51.1 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 3Sundrop Brands LtdSUNDROP | 48.2/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence | ASLEEP | 24.9/35 Revenue 72.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 5.6 pp 65% evidence | 4.5/25 ROCE 2% · OPM 5.5% 100% evidence | 3.5/20 P/E 125× · PEG 4.97 65% evidence | 15.3/20 RS sector 6.2% · RS bench -6.8% · 1Y -24.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 24.9 + 4.5 + 3.5 + 15.3 = 48.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltdthis pageBBTC | 48.1/100Mixed-negative evidence72% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.7/35 Revenue 6.8% · PAT 13.6% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence | 17.6/25 ROCE 33% · OPM 17% 76% evidence | 14.8/20 P/E 8.8× · PEG — 50% evidence | 6.0/20 RS sector -9.6% · RS bench -13.4% · 1Y -23.4%0 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.7 + 17.6 + 14.8 + 6 = 48.1 · Decision use: Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity. | ||||||
| 5Patanjali Foods LtdPATANJALI | 43.6/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.1/35 Revenue 18.3% · PAT 39.3% · OPM change -1 pp 88% evidence | 7.5/25 ROCE 12% · OPM 4% 100% evidence | 18.0/20 P/E 19.2× · PEG 0.67 100% evidence | 0.0/20 RS sector -21.9% · RS bench -31.7% · 1Y -43.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.1 + 7.5 + 18 + 0 = 43.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 6Mrs Bectors Food Specialities LtdBECTORFOOD | 37.6/100Mixed-negative evidence90% evidence | TURNING | 13.5/35 Revenue 9.1% · PAT -1.4% · OPM change 1 pp 88% evidence | 12.6/25 ROCE 14.2% · OPM 13% 100% evidence | 6.0/20 P/E 45× · PEG 5.31 100% evidence | 5.5/20 RS sector -15.7% · RS bench -9.3% · 1Y -32.1%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.5 + 12.6 + 6 + 5.5 = 37.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's share price today?
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd trades at ₹1,497, −21.3% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹10,446 Cr. The stock sits at 17% of its 52-week range of ₹1,375–₹2,079, −8.9% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 77 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.
What were The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's latest quarterly results?
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd reported revenue of ₹4,818 Cr and net profit of ₹781 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 6.6% and profit rose 33.5% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹63.63. The operating margin was 17.0%, 1.0 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's revenue?
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd reported revenue of ₹4,818 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, +6.6% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹19,539 Cr (+6.8%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 8.4% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's profit?
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd earned ₹781 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +33.5% year on year — the 5th straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹2,499 Cr. The operating margin ran 17.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's market cap?
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹10,446 Cr at a share price of ₹1,497. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's P/E ratio?
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd trades at a P/E of 8.8×, at the 8th percentile of its own 10-year range, against a long-run median of 15.7×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.
Does The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd pay a dividend?
Yes — The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's dividend payout was 10% of profit in FY26, and it recorded a payout in 12 of its last 13 reported fiscal years. This page holds the payout ratio, not a per-share amount. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd looks cheap against its own history: its P/E of 8.8× has been cheaper only 8% of the time in 10 years (long-run median 15.7×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. One caveat: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd growing?
Yes — The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +6.6% year on year, profit +33.5%, and the margin −1.0 pp at 17.0%. The 10-year compound rates are 8.4% (revenue) and 12.2% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 31 July 2026.
How is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd performing?
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd is in a downtrend, 77 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 6.6% and profit rose 33.5% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 6 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.
What stage is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd in?
Consistent — revenue and profit growth have stayed positive through the window, with ROCE at 33.0% and holding. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth +6.6% latest, profit growth +33.5% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 31 July 2026.
Is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 77 of stage 4), trading −8.9% versus its 200-day average and at 17% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.
Is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (6 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-25), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.4 years the stock moved +307% against the NIFTY 500's +276% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.
Will The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹1,497, the price is in a downtrend 77 weeks in. Its P/E of 8.8× sits at the 8th percentile of its own 10-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.
Who owns The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd?
Promoters hold 74.0% of The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd, foreign institutions 9.5%, domestic institutions 1.0% and the public 15.5% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 31 July 2026.
Does The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd have too much debt?
No — The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.23, and operating profit covers the interest bill 25×. FY26 borrowings were ₹1,590 Cr against equity of ₹7,042 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 31 July 2026.
What is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's capex?
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd spent ₹1,101 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹238 Cr, with ₹42.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.
What is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's cash flow?
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd generated ₹2,419 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹2,181 Cr of free cash flow after ₹238 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹2,499 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.
Is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 103% of The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹2,419 Cr against reported profit of ₹2,499 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.
Where is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd in its business cycle?
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 18.0%, against a 13-year band of 9.0%–18.0%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran 17.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.
What could break the The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: annual EPS moved +10.7% against a −21.3% price move — the market has not yet caught up with the delivery. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.
Is The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +10.7% in a year against a −21.3% price move. The sharpest open question: whether the price catches up with earnings that have already moved. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.