Netweb Technologies India share price today

Netweb Technologies India Ltd's share price was ₹4,062.30 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been rising for 63 weeks. That is 3.8% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹3,024 and ₹5,601, and at that close it sat 40% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Netweb Technologies India Ltd is in stage 2. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 2 weeks running.

Over the last 3.3 years the share price moved +352% while the NIFTY 500 moved +30%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 23 October 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Three changes stood out: revenue up on a year earlier for 12 quarters in a row (every quarter we can compare), profit up on a year earlier for 12 quarters in a row (every quarter we can compare) and indian funds and insurers (DIIs) raised their stake for 3 quarters in a row.

1. Revenue up on a year earlier for 12 quarters in a row (every quarter we can compare)

   In the September 2026 quarter revenue was ₹1,323 crore, +335.2% on a year earlier.

   Why: Sales jumped because AI systems sales grew very fast.

   From the earnings call on 26 Oct 2026.

2. Profit up on a year earlier for 12 quarters in a row (every quarter we can compare)

   In the September 2026 quarter profit was ₹137 crore, +341.9% on a year earlier.

   Why: Profit rose because the company kept overhead growth low, which softened the effect of thinner margins on big deals.

   From the earnings call on 26 Oct 2026.

3. Indian funds and insurers (DIIs) raised their stake for 3 quarters in a row

   From 3.3% to 7.2% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

For July to September 2026 (the quarter ended 30 September 2026), Netweb Technologies India reported revenue of ₹1,323 crore, up 335.2% from ₹304 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹137 crore, up 341.9% from ₹31.0 crore.

Netweb Technologies India results: July to September 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for October to December 2026, are due by 14 February 2027: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

Netweb Technologies India's management discussed these results on a call held on 26 October 2026; what it said is further down this page.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 September 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Netweb Technologies India closed at ₹4,062.30 on 4 November 2026, up 18.4% from ₹3,431.90 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and up 409.8% over three years. Its highest weekly close since July 2023 was ₹5,601.00 on 21 August 2026.

Netweb Technologies India share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

178 weekly closes from 28 July 2023 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: Netweb Technologies India closed at ₹4,062.30, down 2.6% on the week and down 10.1% on the month. 26 Oct 2026: Netweb Technologies India held its results call for July to September 2026. Management guided: FY27 revenue around ₹4,000 crore.

Earlier

• Results for July to September 2026: Revenue up 335.2% and profit up 341.9% on a year earlier.
• 7 Aug 2026: ex-date for a dividend of ₹3 a share.

Netweb Technologies India paid ₹3 a share in regular dividends in the 12 months to 5 November 2026 (1 payment), a yield of 0.07% at the ₹4,062.30 close on 4 November 2026. The last was a dividend of ₹3 a share, ex-date 7 August 2026.

Netweb Technologies India dividends since 1 April 2021

Amounts as the company declared them on the NSE. A dividend goes to whoever owns the shares before the ex-date. The record date is the same day as the ex-date for every payment here.

Yes. Netweb Technologies India Ltd paid out 8% of its profit as dividends in FY26, and it paid a dividend in 4 of its last 8 reported years.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

On the call for July to September 2026, held on 26 October 2026, Netweb Technologies India's management guided: FY27 revenue around ₹4,000 crore.

“H1 FY27 PAT reached 222 crores, surpassing our full-year FY26 PAT of 206 crores in just six months.”Sanjay Lodha, on the call for July to September 2026

What management guided

• Revenue growth 30-40% yearly growth for next 2-3 years.
• Operating margin around 14% maintained.
• Vera Rubin commercial availability from January, aligned to global timeline.
• Cash conversion cycle 90-110 days going forward.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for July to September 2026, 26 October 2026.

What is changing at Netweb Technologies India, from the latest results and calls: ai segment dominance and sovereign compute tailwind, order book backlog, fy27 revenue visibility and hpc and private cloud sustained growth.

• AI Segment Dominance and Sovereign Compute Tailwind. AI segment grew 460% on a year earlier in FY26 to 43% of revenue; India AI Mission GPU allocations scaling from 10,000 to 100,000+; management sees 18-24 months of sustained demand with no visible supply fulfillment capacity across India. ⚠ estimate
• HPC and Private Cloud Sustained Growth. HPC grew 31% on a year earlier in FY26 despite being diluted to 24% of mix by AI; NSM 2.0 and enterprise adoption of high-performance R&D infrastructure sustain independent growth. ⚠ estimate
• Asset-Light Operating Leverage. ₹20-25 Cr FY27 maintenance capital spending supports ₹3,000 crore+ revenue; 33.2x gross fixed asset turnover; existing capacity sufficient through 35-40% growth without expansion. ⚠ estimate

We check 16 kinds of change in every company, such as costs spread over more sales, higher-value products, new orders, new regions or falling debt, against its reported numbers and what management said on its calls. Only changes the numbers back are shown.

Our read after the latest results, written 17 May 2026.

FY26 strategic execution missed by ₹144 crore (58% of goal) without acknowledgment; ₹1,600 crore phased over 3 quarters FY27 carries same risk if April to June 2026 revenue disappoints.

The main risks

• Strategic Order Execution Slippage: FY26 strategic execution missed by ₹144 crore (58% of goal) without acknowledgment; ₹1,600 crore phased over 3 quarters FY27 carries same risk if April to June 2026 revenue disappoints. ✓ fact
• Revenue Lumpiness and Quarterly Volatility: Dec 2025 quarter ₹805 crore vs Sep 2025 ₹304 crore, 2.6x quarterly swing; management denied lumpiness then admitted it; order-based execution means any given quarter can miss sharply. ✓ fact
• Working Capital and Cash Conversion Cycle Deterioration: Cash conversion cycle hit 120 days in Sep 2025 vs 80-100 guided; improved to 84 days by Mar 2026 but inventory buildup for strategic orders keeps risk elevated. ✓ fact
• GPU Supply Chain Concentration: Critical dependency on Nvidia GPU allocation (B200, GB300); global AI compute supply constrained; any disruption to Nvidia partnership or allocation priority would halt strategic order execution. ✓ fact

Our read after the latest results, written 17 May 2026.

When Netweb Technologies India reports October to December 2026, these are the 3 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: Second-half execution versus full-year ambition - check whether billed revenue tracks flagged goal after strong first half.

Netweb Technologies India is on 2 of our India lists: Small & mid cap stocks and AI & data centre stocks.

Netweb Technologies India Ltd earned ₹137 Cr of net profit in the Sep 2026 quarter, +341.9% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 12th quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹206 Cr. Over 7 years profit has grown 83.0% a year on average. That is 10.4% of the quarter's revenue.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹31.0 Cr.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹206 Cr (+80.7% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +335.2% on a year earlier and the margin moved +0.0 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +183.4% and revenue +183.8%. Profit and revenue are moving at about the same pace.

Netweb Technologies India Ltd reported ₹1,323 Cr of revenue in the Sep 2026 quarter, +335.2% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 12th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 7 years it has grown 49.6% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹2,184 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹3,722 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹2,184 Cr, +90.1% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +183.8% on average, against 49.6% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +174.9%, against +101.2% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating); profit over the last 12 months grew +173.1%, against +94.2% a year (accelerating).

Netweb Technologies India Ltd's operating margin was 15.0% in the Sep 2026 quarter, about the same as the same quarter a year ago. Across 8 years it has been between 5.0% and 16.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why this happened. The structural inflection is real. FY26 AI segment revenue surged 459.6% YoY, reaching 43.4% of total revenue. The government procurement pipeline has two distinct channels that are both active: CSP-based GPU rental (already commenced) and direct on-premise government data center infrastructure (Rs 4,500 Cr allocation yet to be fully tendered). Multiple demand drivers converge: government (sovereign AI), Neocloud providers (Yotta), enterprises, and GSPs (TCS, Infosys, Wipro) all expanding. Netweb is India's only full-stack domestic manufacturer positioned to capture all channels. The 18-24 month demand visibility claim is anchored in the Rs 2,400 Cr order book (>FY26 revenue) plus the Rs…

In the latest quarter it moved +0.0 percentage points on the same quarter a year ago.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −0.1 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −7.4 points. So the drop came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 201% of Netweb Technologies India Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY26 it brought in ₹790 Cr of operating cash against ₹206 Cr of profit. After ₹18.0 Cr of spending on assets, ₹772 Cr was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 201% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 24 days longer between FY21 and FY26, so more of each rupee of profit waits in the business before it arrives.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 2.1× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Netweb Technologies India Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 121 days in FY26, up from 97 days in FY21. It spent ₹66.0 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 112 days to pay, and stock sits for 170 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹2,184 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹6.0 Cr, so roughly ₹724 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 112 days to pay and stock sat for 170 days, about 5.6 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of 121 days, longer than FY21's 97.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 170 days. Customers pay about 112 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 161 days. Together that makes the 121-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹66.0 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹31.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹2.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Netweb Technologies India Ltd's P/E is 66.0×, about the lowest it has ever been. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 137.8×, over 3.3 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why this happened. The business model is capability-driven, not capacity-driven. Current facility supports revenue up to Rs 2,500-3,000 Cr without significant capex. Beyond that, management has expansion plans (details internal). New 15,000 sq ft facility for liquid-cooled systems (150kW+ per rack density) is commissioned and supports emerging GPU architectures. R&D spend 3% of turnover (~Rs 65 Cr in FY26), expensed not capitalized. ROE 32.9%, ROCE 37.5% on a zero-net-debt balance sheet. Operating cash flow Rs 171.5 Cr in FY26 on a PAT of Rs 206 Cr, strong cash conversion.

The P/E here, and its history, use a profit figure that can leave out one-off items, so it can differ from a P/E worked out on the quarterly results. Those results' earnings per share for the four quarters to Sep 2026 add up to ₹63.31.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +80.0% while the price moved +18.4%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved +72.1% a year; about +95.2% a year came from earnings growth and about −23.1 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Netweb Technologies India Ltd's business is growing steadily. Revenue and profit growth have stayed positive throughout, and ROCE is steady at 39.6%. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: steady growth with healthy returns is how a business compounds over time.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Netweb Technologies India Ltd's story is not scored yet against the checks our research set on 17 May 2026. Where it sits in its own cycle: EXPANDING MID STAGE. Still open: FY26 strategic execution missed by Rs 144 Cr (58% of goal) without acknowledgment; Rs 1,600 Cr phased over 3 quarters FY27 carries same risk if Q1 FY27 revenue disappoints.

NOT YET CHECKED

What is not proven yet. FY26 strategic execution missed by Rs 144 Cr (58% of goal) without acknowledgment; Rs 1,600 Cr phased over 3 quarters FY27 carries same risk if Q1 FY27 revenue disappoints.

The test written in advance. Strategic Order Execution Slippage. Measured by: Strategic Order Execution Slippage Q1 FY27 revenue vs implied Rs 600-700 Cr quarterly run-rate for 35-40% growth by the next result.

The test written in advance. Revenue Lumpiness and Quarterly Volatility. Measured by: Revenue Lumpiness and Quarterly Volatility Standard deviation of quarterly revenues; management tone on Q1 FY27 guidance vs actuals by the next result.

What the company does. FY26 closed with revenue +90%, PAT +81%, order book Rs 2,400 cr entering FY27 (exceeding FY26 total revenue), AI segment surging 460% to 43% of mix, structural inflection, not cycle. Three management consistency failures in 4 quarters (strategic order goal missed, pipeline window tripled, lumpiness denial) mean the 35-40% FY27 guide must be discounted until Q1-Q2 FY27 actuals confirm.

The key numbers to watch, and the level that would change the picture

Everything further down this page is evidence for or against these.

• 1 · Operating leveragebuilding
• 2 · Value-added mixbuilding
• 3 · Management changequiet
• 4 · Paying down debtquiet
• 5 · Regulatory approvalquiet
• 6 · Order-book winsbuilding
• 7 · Consolidationquiet
• 8 · Demerger or value unlockbuilding
• 9 · Buybackquiet
• 10 · New geographiesquiet
• 11 · More business from existing customersbuilding
• 12 · New product launchquiet
• 13 · Mandatory normsquiet
• 14 · A bigger market to servequiet
• 15 · Market-share gainsquiet
• 16 · Asset qualityquiet

Lever 1 · Operating leverage: building. AI segment grew 460% YoY in FY26 to 43% of revenue; India AI Mission GPU allocations scaling from 10,000 to 100,000+; management sees 18-24 months of sustained demand with no visible supply fulfillment capacity across India. What proves it keeps working: AI Segment Dominance and Sovereign Compute Tailwind. It stops working if Q1 FY27 revenue vs implied Rs 600-700 Cr quarterly run-rate for 35-40% growth.

Lever 2 · Value-added mix: building. HPC grew 31% YoY in FY26 despite being diluted to 24% of mix by AI; NSM 2.0 and enterprise adoption of high-performance R&D infrastructure sustain independent growth. What proves it keeps working: HPC and Private Cloud Sustained Growth. It stops working if Q1 FY27 revenue vs implied Rs 600-700 Cr quarterly run-rate for 35-40% growth.

Lever 8 · Demerger or value unlock: building. Rs 20-25 Cr FY27 maintenance capex supports Rs 3,000 Cr+ revenue; 33.2x gross fixed asset turnover; existing capacity sufficient through 35-40% growth without expansion. What proves it keeps working: Asset-Light Operating Leverage. It stops working if Q1 FY27 revenue vs implied Rs 600-700 Cr quarterly run-rate for 35-40% growth.

Sources: our stock research file (17 May 2026) · quarterly results through Sep 2026 · the company’s own earnings calls. The story check is re-scored every results season; the record below never changes.

The whole page in one table. Each row links to its section.

What Netweb Technologies India Ltd's management promised, against what actually happened: 4 promises on the record. Read straight from the company’s own earnings calls. A promise that slipped stays on this page after it is met.

FY27 Revenue Goal Is Materially Above Prior Guidance · 26 October 2026. In May 2026 and July 2026, management used a 35%-40% growth framework, and the May call specifically said the top-line guidance excluded strategic orders. In October 2026, management instead planned 4,000 crores for FY27; against FY26 revenue of INR21,836 million disclosed in May, this implies roughly 83% growth, materially above the prior framework, without explaining whether the goal now includes strategic-order execution.

Long-Term Growth Range Was Lowered at the Floor · 26 October 2026. The May 2026 and July 2026 calls used a 35%-40% growth range for the coming years, while the October 2026 call stated a 30%-40% CAGR range for the next 2-3 years. The lower end therefore fell by 5 percentage points, a material change to the downside case, yet management said it had always maintained the broader range and did not explain the change from the prior stated range.

Order Execution Cycle Reversed Without Explanation · 26 October 2026. The July 2026 call explicitly moved the stated order cycle to 16-20 weeks, but the October 2026 call gave a 10-16-week standard timeline for any order. This is a material acceleration in modeled delivery timing and could affect revenue phasing and working-capital assumptions, but management did not explain the reversal.

Execution Cycle Lengthened · 29 July 2026. Management materially shifted the stated normal execution cycle in Jul 2026. The prior calls described normal cycles of 10 to 20 weeks and 12 to 16 weeks, while the latest call moved the range to 16 to 20 weeks; management cited project-specific variability but did not explain the change, which could defer order-book conversion and revenue recognition.

Every quote above is taken word for word from the company’s own earnings calls.

Netweb Technologies India Ltd earned a ROCE of 37% in FY26. That is up from a low of 31% in FY20. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 31.5 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 9.4% net margin and 0.97× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 9.4% net margin × 0.97× asset turnover × 3.12× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 28.4% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 43.5% − 12.0% = +31.5 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. A gap this wide means each rupee put back into the business creates more than a rupee of value.

The 43.5% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY26 at 41.7%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

Netweb Technologies India Ltd has total debt of ₹333 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹2,104 Cr as of Sep 2026, so its debt is 0.16× its equity, which is very little. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.38 in FY23 to 0.39 in FY26. So the returns on this page come from the business, not from borrowed money.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

Promoters cut their stake in Netweb Technologies India Ltd by 7.2 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Promoters now own 64.2% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −2.7 points over the same period, to 9.5%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Promoters: −7.2 points over 8 quarters, to 64.2%; Foreign institutions: −2.7 points over 8 quarters, to 9.5%; Domestic institutions: +1.6 points over 8 quarters, to 7.2%.

Why the owners changed: foreign institutions moved −2.7 points and domestic institutions +1.6 points over 8 quarters, while promoters moved −7.2 points. One group of institutions took over shares from the other; it is not a change of mind by the people running the company.

For Netweb Technologies India Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

54.9 out of 100, rank 2 of 5 in Data Centre, with 83% of the evidence available.

Netweb Technologies India Ltd scores 54.9 out of 100 against the 5 companies it is compared with in Data Centre, ranking 2. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 20.1 + 17.4 + 9.3 + 8.1 = 54.9. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Netweb Technologies India ranks 2 of 5 Data Centre companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 54.9 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Data Centre, all 5 compared on one page.

Netweb Technologies India is the largest of 5 Data Centre companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). It is the largest. Just below it: Anant Raj, Black Box, E2E Networks and Techno Electric & Engineering Company.

Data Centre companies close in size

1. Netweb Technologies India Ltd ₹24,805 crore
2. Anant Raj Ltd ₹16,097 crore
3. Black Box Ltd ₹14,150 crore
4. E2E Networks Ltd ₹10,698 crore
5. Techno Electric & Engineering Company Ltd ₹9,645 crore

All 5 Data Centre companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

317. Dalmia Bharat Ltd ₹24,875 crore · Cement
318. Bandhan Bank Ltd ₹24,865 crore · Banks - Private
319. Netweb Technologies India Ltd ₹24,805 crore
320. TVS Holdings Ltd ₹24,671 crore · Finance - Holding Company
321. Aegis Vopak Terminals Ltd ₹24,481 crore · Miscellaneous

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.