Epack Durable share price today

Epack Durable Ltd's share price was ₹157.83 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been falling for 53 weeks. That is 30.5% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹154 and ₹299, and at that close it sat 3% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Epack Durable Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 15 weeks running.

Over the last 2.8 years the share price moved −23% while the NIFTY 500 moved +9%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 24 July 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Two changes stood out: indian funds and insurers (DIIs) cut their stake for 3 quarters in a row and foreign funds (FIIs) raised their stake for 3 quarters in a row.

1. Indian funds and insurers (DIIs) cut their stake for 3 quarters in a row

   From 7.1% to 5.2% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

2. Foreign funds (FIIs) raised their stake for 3 quarters in a row

   From 0.3% to 1.5% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

For July to September 2026 (the quarter ended 30 September 2026), Epack Durable reported revenue of ₹439 crore, up 106.1% from ₹213 crore a year earlier, and a loss of ₹25.0 crore.

Epack Durable results: July to September 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for October to December 2026, are due by 14 February 2027: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

Epack Durable's management discussed these results on a call held on 30 October 2026; what it said is further down this page.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 September 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Epack Durable closed at ₹157.83 on 4 November 2026, down 47.1% from ₹298.50 a year earlier (7 November 2025). Its highest weekly close since February 2024 was ₹625.10 on 3 January 2025.

Epack Durable share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 4 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

148 weekly closes from 2 February 2024 to 4 November 2026.

4 Nov 2026: Epack Durable closed at ₹157.83, up 2.0% on the week and down 8.0% on the month. 30 Oct 2026: Epack Durable held its results call for July to September 2026. Management guided: Front-load washing-machine pilot by end-Nov 2026 with mass production from Dec onward at EMPL.

Earlier

• Results for July to September 2026: Revenue up 106.1% on a year earlier.

Epack Durable has paid no dividend on the NSE since its first NSE close in our records (2 February 2024), the start of the period we checked.

No. Epack Durable Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in each of its last 7 reported years, so there is no payout history to show. That comes from the filed annual statements, not an estimate.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

On the call for July to September 2026, held on 30 October 2026, Epack Durable's management guided: Front-load washing-machine pilot by end-Nov 2026 with mass production from Dec onward at EMPL.

“Reported profitability is being held back by depreciation and interest for new capacities, the lag in passing through commodity costs, the absence of PLI income, and seasonality, not by any weakness in demand or competitiveness.”Ajay DD Singhania, on the call for July to September 2026

What management guided

• Gross debt to stay similar medium term around 0.8 times equity with no new significant capital.
• Working capital to remain within current limits as SDA share rises on better payment terms.
• PLI discounts passed to brands to be rolled back phased quarter-on-quarter aiding margin normalization into next year.
• Non-RAC share toward nearly 50% on yearly basis as washing machines, small appliances and components ramp.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for July to September 2026, 30 October 2026.

When Epack Durable reports October to December 2026, these are the 2 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: Front-load washing-machine mass output commencing at flagged timeline - per completed tech transfer and ongoing pilot.

Epack Durable is on 2 of our India lists: 52 week high & low and Semiconductor stocks.

Epack Durable Ltd posted a net loss of ₹25.0 Cr in the Sep 2026 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹3.0 Cr. Over 6 years profit has grown 7.0% a year on average. That loss is 5.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹22.0 Cr. 3 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹3.0 Cr (−94.5% on the year before).

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −49.3% and revenue +36.3%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

Epack Durable Ltd reported ₹439 Cr of revenue in the Sep 2026 quarter, +106.1% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 2nd quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 6 years it has grown 16.2% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,894 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹2,344 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹1,894 Cr, −12.8% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +36.3% on average, against 16.2% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +23.7%, against +9.5% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating).

Epack Durable Ltd's operating margin was 0.9% in the Sep 2026 quarter, 1.4 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 7 years it has been between 5.0% and 8.0%. The latest quarter is below every full year in that period.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +1.4 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −2.9 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 159% of Epack Durable Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY26 its operations used ₹140 Cr of cash, against ₹3.0 Cr of profit. After ₹303 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹443 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 159% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 14 days shorter between FY21 and FY26, so cash that used to wait in the business now arrives sooner.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 4.6× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Epack Durable Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 96 days in FY26, down from 110 days in FY21. It spent ₹623 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 68 days to pay, and stock sits for 190 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹1,894 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹5.2 Cr, so roughly ₹498 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 68 days to pay and stock sat for 190 days, about 6.3 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of 96 days, shorter than FY21's 110.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 190 days. Customers pay about 68 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 162 days. Together that makes the 96-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹623 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹136 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹89.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Epack Durable Ltd's P/E is 56.5×, near the low end of its own history: it has been lower only 26% of the time. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 63.2×, over 2.3 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved −94.1% while the price moved −47.1%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Epack Durable Ltd's business is getting worse. Profit and EPS growth are shrinking: profit growth is −123.8% in the latest quarter, against +59.5% at its best in 12 quarters, with ROCE falling at 4.6%. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: falling lines mean any ratio below that looks low should be read with that direction in mind.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Epack Durable Ltd earned a ROCE of 5% in FY26. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 9.1 percentage points below its cost of capital, so growth here does not yet pay for the capital it uses. It comes from a 0.2% net margin and 0.76× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 0.2% net margin × 0.76× asset turnover × 2.61× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 0.4% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 2.9% − 12.0% = −9.1 percentage points. The 12.0% is a standard assumption for the cost of capital in India, not an estimate for this company. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Negative: growth at these returns loses value until returns improve.

The 2.9% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY26 at 1.3%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

Epack Durable Ltd has total debt of ₹840 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹948 Cr as of Sep 2026, so its debt is 0.89× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 2.18 in FY23 to 0.77 in FY26. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

Domestic institutions cut their stake in Epack Durable Ltd by 5.4 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Domestic institutions now own 5.2% of the company. Promoters moved −1.6 points over the same period, to 46.4%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Domestic institutions: −5.4 points over 8 quarters, to 5.2%; Promoters: −1.6 points over 8 quarters, to 46.4%; Foreign institutions: −0.5 points over 8 quarters, to 1.4%.

Why the owners changed: domestic institutions drove it (−5.4 points), together with promoters (−1.6 points). They reduced their stake.

For Epack Durable Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

35.9 out of 100, rank 9 of 10 in Consumer Electronics - EMS, with 56% of the evidence available.

Epack Durable Ltd scores 35.9 out of 100 against the 10 companies it is compared with in Consumer Electronics - EMS, ranking 9. Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 15.8 + 2.6 + 10 + 7.5 = 35.9. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Epack Durable ranks 9 of 10 Consumer Electronics - EMS companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 35.9 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Consumer Electronics - EMS, all 10 compared on one page.

Epack Durable is the 10th largest of 10 Consumer Electronics - EMS companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Amber Enterprises India, PG Electroplast, Avalon Technologies, Optiemus Infracom, Cyient DLM and Virtuoso Optoelectronics. It is the smallest.

Consumer Electronics - EMS companies close in size

4. Amber Enterprises India Ltd ₹20,685 crore
5. PG Electroplast Ltd ₹15,200 crore
6. Avalon Technologies Ltd ₹13,713 crore
7. Optiemus Infracom Ltd ₹7,495 crore
8. Cyient DLM Ltd ₹5,955 crore
9. Virtuoso Optoelectronics Ltd ₹1,654 crore
10. Epack Durable Ltd ₹1,490 crore

All 10 Consumer Electronics - EMS companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1387. Bhartiya International Ltd ₹1,493 crore · Textiles
1388. Silver Touch Technologies Ltd ₹1,492 crore · IT - Software
1389. Epack Durable Ltd ₹1,490 crore
1390. Kapston Services Ltd ₹1,490 crore · Services - Others
1391. Nitta Gelatin India Ltd ₹1,489 crore · Chemicals - Organic

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.