Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-31
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-07-31

Cyient DLM Ltd

CYIENTDLM
Consumer Electronics - EMS

Cyient DLM Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −39% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (7 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 51st percentile of its own 3-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +128.6% year on year, and −39% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the cash starts following the profit.

Stage
Mixed
fundamental trajectory, 12 quarters
Price
₹670
+50.3% 1Y
P/E
64.8×
51st pctile
of its own 3-year range
Revenue (Jun 26)
₹374 Cr
+34.5% YoY
Profit (Jun 26)
₹16.0 Cr
+128.6% YoY
Operating margin
10.0%
+1.0 pp YoY
ROCE
10%
FY26
ROIC
7.0%
vs WACC 12.0% → −5.0 pp
Cash conversion
−39%
of profit, last 3 FY
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Cyient DLM Ltd trades at ₹670, in a confirmed uptrend and 7 weeks into that stage. That is +49.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 100% of a 52-week range of ₹279 to ₹670. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 21 straight weeks.

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 7 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹670 it trades +49.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 100% of its 52-week range (₹279–₹670).

Jul 26: ₹670 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
+49.3% versus the 200-day line, week 7 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S4₹884₹722₹559₹397₹234₹670₹449Jul 23May 24Feb 25Nov 25Jul 26
S2S4₹884₹722₹559₹397₹234₹670₹449Jul 23Feb 25Jul 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2023 Each cell is one week from 2023 to now (166 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Jul 23Jul 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 3.0 years the stock moved +34% while the NIFTY 500 moved +38% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 21 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Cyient DLM Ltd trades at 64.8× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (51st percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 64.7×, measured across 3.0 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 64.8× is mid-range by its own standards (51st percentile), against a long-run median of 64.7× measured over 3.0 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 64.8× vs a 64.7× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 3.0-year window; loss-period spikes above 114× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
mid-range by its own standards (51st percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
121.4×₹11.296.0×₹8.470.7×₹5.645.4×₹2.820.0×₹0.0×64.70×₹10Jul 23Apr 24Feb 25Nov 25Jul 26
121.4×₹11.296.0×₹8.470.7×₹5.645.4×₹2.820.0×₹0.0×64.70×₹10Jul 23Feb 25Jul 26
PEG 2.41 PEG ratio per quarter — the P/E divided by the earnings-growth rate. The dashed line marks 1.0: below it the growth is cheap against the multiple, above it the price already prices the growth in. Last 12 quarters.
above 1.0, the multiple already banks the growth
PEGPEG = 1.0
2.6×2.0×1.5×1.0×0.5××2.41×Q2 FY24Q4 FY24Q3 FY25Q2 FY26Q1 FY27
2.6×2.0×1.5×1.0×0.5××2.41×Q2 FY24Q3 FY25Q1 FY27
P/E
64.8×
51st percentile of 3y
PEG
2.97
as reported

🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +7.6% against a +50.3% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +9.6%/yr price move, ~+20.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−10.4 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: Mixed

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Cyient DLM Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves, ROCE holding at 11.3% — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue −17.0% in FY26, profit +7.4% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn.
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
48%264%31%167%13%70%−4.3%−28%−22%−125%%%−17%7.4%FY19FY22FY26
48%264%31%167%13%70%−4.3%−28%−22%−125%%%−17%7.4%FY19FY22FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue rolling over, profit accelerating
RevenueProfitEPS
58%129%38%89%18%49%−2.3%9.2%−23%−31%%%−11.8%26.6%26.3%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
58%129%38%89%18%49%−2.3%9.2%−23%−31%%%−11.8%26.6%26.3%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
ROCE Trailing-twelve-month operating profit (before interest and tax) as a share of average capital employed — total assets minus current liabilities, the standard textbook basis, %.
the return curve, computed quarterly
ROCE
18%16%14%12%10.0%%11.3%Sep 23Mar 24Dec 24Sep 25Jun 26
18%16%14%12%10.0%%11.3%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
Revenue growth
Falling
latest −11.8% · span −17.0% to +52.8%
Profit growth
Steady high
latest +26.6% · span −4.5% to +118.1%
EPS growth
Flat
latest +26.3% · span −19.7% to +36.6%
ROCE
Stuck low
latest 11.3% · span 10.5%–17.3%

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue−17.0%+14.9%+15.0%
Profit+7.4%+31.6%+43.5%
EPS+7.6%+15.4%−36.1%
Share price+50.3%+9.6%
Revenue YoY (Jun 26)
+34.5%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Jun 26)
+128.6%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
14.8%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

55.8/100 — rank 4 of 9 in Consumer Electronics - EMS · 100% evidence confidence

Cyient DLM Ltd scores 55.8 out of 100 against the 9 companies it is compared with in Consumer Electronics - EMS, ranking 4. Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 19.4 + 8.8 + 7.6 + 20 = 55.8. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Cyient DLM Ltd reported ₹374 Cr of revenue in the Jun 26 quarter, +34.5% year on year. Over 7 years it has compounded at 14.8% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,261 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,357 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹1,261 Cr (−17.0% on the year), capping 7 years at 14.8% compound. The latest quarter (Jun 26) printed ₹374 Cr, +34.5% year on year.

FY26 revenue ₹1,261 Cr (−17.0% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 8-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
14.8% a year over 7 years
RevenueYoY growth
1.6k48%1.2k31%82113%410−4.3%0−22%₹ Cr%₹1,261−17%FY19FY22FY26
1.6k48%1.2k31%82113%410−4.3%0−22%₹ Cr%₹1,261−17%FY19FY22FY26
Jun 26: ₹374 Cr (+34.5% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
48080%36050%24020%120−10%0−40%₹ Cr%₹37434.5%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
48080%36050%24020%120−10%0−40%₹ Cr%₹37434.5%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −7.8% growth against the decade's 14.8% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −11.8% over the last 4 quarters against +4.9%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over; TTM profit +26.6% vs +10.0%/yr — accelerating.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Cyient DLM Ltd's operating margin is 10.0% in the Jun 26 quarter, +1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 8 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 3.0% to 12.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 10.0%, +1.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 8 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 3.0%–12.0%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +1.5 pp year on year while gross margin went −2.3 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY26: 10.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 8-year window.
within a 3.0–12.0% band over 8 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
13%5.6%10%3.5%7.5%1.5%4.9%−0.5%2.3%−2.6%%%10%1%FY19FY22FY26
13%5.6%10%3.5%7.5%1.5%4.9%−0.5%2.3%−2.6%%%10%1%FY19FY22FY26
Jun 26: 10.0% operating margin (+1.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
14%3.5%12%1.7%9.5%0.0%7.5%−1.7%5.4%−3.5%%%10%1%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
14%3.5%12%1.7%9.5%0.0%7.5%−1.7%5.4%−3.5%%%10%1%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Cyient DLM Ltd earned ₹16.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +128.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹73.0 Cr. That is 4.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹7.0 Cr.

Jun 26 profit was ₹16.0 Cr, +128.6% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹73.0 Cr (+7.4%).

FY26 profit ₹73.0 Cr (+7.4% YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 8-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
79254%56180%33107%1033%−13−40%₹ Cr%₹737.4%FY19FY22FY26
79254%56180%33107%1033%−13−40%₹ Cr%₹737.4%FY19FY22FY26
Jun 26: ₹16.0 Cr (+128.6% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
35235%26161%1788%914%0−59%₹ Cr%₹16128.6%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
35235%26161%1788%914%0−59%₹ Cr%₹16128.6%Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +34.5% and the margin +1.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +53.2% vs revenue −7.8%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years −39% of Cyient DLM Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹54.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹73.0 Cr of profit. After ₹48.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹6.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹54.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹73.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹6.0 Cr after ₹48.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is −39% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹54.0 Cr vs profit ₹73.0 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 8-year window, annual resolution. FY20/FY25 reflects an acquisition year — point shown clipped.
−39% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
8932−25−83−140₹ Cr₹54₹73₹6FY19FY22FY26
8932−25−83−140₹ Cr₹54₹73₹6FY19FY22FY26
FY26: CFO = 74% of profit (three-year rate −39%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
325%206%88%−30%−149%%74%FY19FY22FY26
325%206%88%−30%−149%%74%FY19FY22FY26

🚨 Why conversion sits at −39%: the cash cycle stretched 164 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: conversion is below par and the cash cycle has stretched 164 days — the next section's job is to find where the cash is stuck.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Cyient DLM Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 270 days in FY26, up from 106 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹294 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹1,261 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹3.5 Cr, so roughly ₹933 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 89 days, inventory at 314 days — roughly 10.3 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 270 days, looser than FY21's 106.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 314 days to sell; customers pay about 89 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 133 days — netting out to the 270-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹1,261 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹3.5 Cr — so the 270-day loop keeps roughly ₹933 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 270-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 8-year window.
+164 days vs FY21
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
33625717910122days270d314d89d133dFY19FY20FY22FY24FY26
33625717910122days270d314d89d133dFY19FY22FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹294 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹99.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹2.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹48.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹2.0 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
a build-out
CapexWork-in-progress
208156104520₹ Cr₹48₹2FY20FY21FY23FY24FY26
208156104520₹ Cr₹48₹2FY20FY23FY26

The synthesis: the working-capital loop is the cash sink the router flagged — watch the cycle, not the P&L.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Cyient DLM Ltd earns a ROCE of 10% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 4% in FY20. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −5.0 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 5.8% net margin on 0.77× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 10%, recovered from a FY20 trough of 4% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 5.8% net margin × 0.77× asset turns × 1.62× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 7.2% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 7.0% − 12.0% = a −5.0 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY26: ROCE 10% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 7-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the climb back from FY20's 4%
ROCEROIC (annual)WACC
21%17%12%7.4%2.7%%10%5.8%FY20FY23FY26
21%17%12%7.4%2.7%%10%5.8%FY20FY23FY26
Q4 FY26: ROCE 7.3% (TTM) vs WACC 12.0% Trailing-twelve-month ROCE and ROIC, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)ROIC (TTM)WACC
12%11%9.1%7.5%5.8%%7.3%6.3%Q2 FY24Q3 FY25Q1 FY27
12%11%9.1%7.5%5.8%%7.3%6.3%Q2 FY24Q3 FY25Q1 FY27
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.

Cyient DLM Ltd carries total debt of ₹172 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,012 Cr as of Jun 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.17 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 4.38 in FY22 to 0.17 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Jun 26: total debt of ₹172 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹1,012 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.17. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 4.38 (FY22) to 0.17 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

FY26: debt ₹172 Cr at 0.17× equity Total debt by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
3844.7×2883.5×1922.3×961.1×0−0.2×₹ Cr×₹1720.17×FY22FY24FY26
3844.7×2883.5×1922.3×961.1×0−0.2×₹ Cr×₹1720.17×FY22FY24FY26
Jun 26: debt ₹172 Cr, debt-to-equity 0.17 Total debt per quarter, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters. India reports the full balance sheet half-yearly, so the intervening quarter carries the prior reading forward.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
3700.39×2780.33×1850.27×930.21×00.15×₹ Cr×₹1720.17×Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
3700.39×2780.33×1850.27×930.21×00.15×₹ Cr×₹1720.17×Sep 23Dec 24Jun 26
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Promoters cut 14.5 points of Cyient DLM Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 52.1% of the company. Domestic institutions moved +11.8 points over the same window, to 29.2%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Promoters: −14.5 points over 8 quarters to 52.1%; Domestic institutions: +11.8 points over 8 quarters to 29.2%; Foreign institutions: −4.9 points over 8 quarters to 0.2%.

Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions −4.9 points against domestic institutions +11.8 points over 8 quarters, with promoters −14.5 points — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters −14.5 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
72%53%34%15%−4.5%%52.1%0.8%26.7%20.4%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
72%53%34%15%−4.5%%52.1%0.8%26.7%20.4%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
Promoters cut 14.5 points over 8 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
72%53%33%14%−5.1%%52.1%0.2%29.2%18.4%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
72%53%33%14%−5.1%%52.1%0.2%29.2%18.4%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Cyient DLM Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · Consumer Electronics - EMS
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Avalon Technologies LtdAVALON 71.3/100Favorable setup96% evidence LEADER 27.5/35 Revenue 46% · PAT 79.4% · OPM change 0 pp 88% evidence 19.7/25 ROCE 19.5% · OPM 12% 100% evidence 6.0/20 P/E 107× · PEG 2.67 100% evidence 18.1/20 RS sector 30.9% · RS bench 55.8% · 1Y 119.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 27.5 + 19.7 + 6 + 18.1 = 71.3 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Syrma SGS Technology LtdSYRMA 69.2/100Favorable setup82% evidence LEADER 31.2/35 Revenue 53% · PAT 87.4% · OPM change 1 pp 95% evidence 16.4/25 ROCE 16.7% · OPM 10% 76% evidence 9.1/20 P/E 71× · PEG — 50% evidence 12.5/20 RS sector 23.1% · RS bench 47.1% · 1Y 87.7%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 31.2 + 16.4 + 9.1 + 12.5 = 69.2 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
3Dixon Technologies (India) LtdDIXON 65.0/100Favorable setup82% evidence BREAKING OUT 22.8/35 Revenue 14.3% · PAT 51.7% · OPM change -0.8 pp 95% evidence 17.6/25 ROCE 42% · OPM 3% 76% evidence 14.3/20 P/E 45.8× · PEG — 50% evidence 10.3/20 RS sector -12.3% · RS bench 4.9% · 1Y -15.9%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.8 + 17.6 + 14.3 + 10.3 = 65 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
4Cyient DLM Ltdthis pageCYIENTDLM 55.8/100Mixed-positive evidence100% evidence LEADER 19.4/35 Revenue -11.8% · PAT 26.6% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 8.8/25 ROCE 9.9% · OPM 10% 100% evidence 7.6/20 P/E 64.8× · PEG 6.44 100% evidence 20.0/20 RS sector 31.4% · RS bench 56.9% · 1Y 45.9%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.4 + 8.8 + 7.6 + 20 = 55.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
5Kaynes Technology India LtdKAYNES 51.5/100Mixed-positive evidence83% evidence ASLEEP 17.4/35 Revenue 33.3% · PAT 24.2% · OPM change -1 pp 88% evidence 15.7/25 ROCE 13.2% · OPM 16% 100% evidence 13.9/20 P/E 69.7× · PEG 1.33 65% evidence 4.5/20 RS sector -17.3% · RS bench -18.8% · 1Y -33.2%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.4 + 15.7 + 13.9 + 4.5 = 51.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Virtuoso Optoelectronics LtdVOEPL 43.9/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence 18.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.3 pp 32% evidence 7.3/25 ROCE 9.6% · OPM 9.2% 95% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 104× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.0/20 RS sector -15% · RS bench 12.3% · 1Y 2.4%0 of 3 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 7.3 + 9.6 + 9 = 43.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7PG Electroplast LtdPGEL 36.8/100Mixed-negative evidence96% evidence BREAKING OUT 9.0/35 Revenue 8.6% · PAT -31.6% · OPM change -4 pp 88% evidence 11.3/25 ROCE 10.3% · OPM 7% 100% evidence 6.3/20 P/E 89.5× · PEG 2.29 100% evidence 10.2/20 RS sector -9.8% · RS bench 9.2% · 1Y -23.4%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 9 + 11.3 + 6.3 + 10.2 = 36.8 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Amber Enterprises India LtdAMBER 27.2/100Adverse evidence78% evidence ASLEEP 11.2/35 Revenue 22.2% · PAT -9.6% · OPM change -1 pp 83% evidence 8.1/25 ROCE 10.2% · OPM 7% 76% evidence 5.6/20 P/E 133× · PEG — 50% evidence 2.3/20 RS sector -17.6% · RS bench -0.8% · 1Y 2.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 11.2 + 8.1 + 5.6 + 2.3 = 27.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
9Epack Durable LtdEPACK 17.6/100Adverse evidence83% evidence ASLEEP 2.7/35 Revenue -12.7% · PAT -80% · OPM change -7 pp 88% evidence 1.1/25 ROCE 4.5% · OPM 4% 100% evidence 10.4/20 P/E 678× · PEG 1.41 65% evidence 3.4/20 RS sector -19.1% · RS bench -18.6% · 1Y -35.4%0 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 2.7 + 1.1 + 10.4 + 3.4 = 17.6 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Cyient DLM Ltd's share price today?

Cyient DLM Ltd trades at ₹670, +50.3% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹5,319 Cr. The stock sits at 100% of its 52-week range of ₹279–₹670, +49.3% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 7 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.

What were Cyient DLM Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Cyient DLM Ltd reported revenue of ₹374 Cr and net profit of ₹16.0 Cr for the Jun 26 quarter. Revenue rose 34.5% and profit rose 128.6% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹2.05. The operating margin was 10.0%, 1.0 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Cyient DLM Ltd's revenue?

Cyient DLM Ltd reported revenue of ₹374 Cr in the Jun 26 quarter, +34.5% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹1,261 Cr (−17.0%). Over the last 7 years revenue compounded at 14.8% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Cyient DLM Ltd's profit?

Cyient DLM Ltd earned ₹16.0 Cr of net profit in the Jun 26 quarter, +128.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹73.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 10.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Cyient DLM Ltd's market cap?

Cyient DLM Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹5,319 Cr at a share price of ₹670. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Cyient DLM Ltd's P/E ratio?

Cyient DLM Ltd trades at a P/E of 64.8×, at the 51st percentile of its own 3-year range, against a long-run median of 64.7×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Cyient DLM Ltd pay a dividend?

No — Cyient DLM Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 8 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Cyient DLM Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Cyient DLM Ltd looks mid-range against its own history: its P/E of 64.8× sits at the 51st percentile of its 3-year range (long-run median 64.7×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Cyient DLM Ltd growing?

Yes — Cyient DLM Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +34.5% year on year, profit +128.6%, and the margin +1.0 pp at 10.0%. The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 31 July 2026.

How is Cyient DLM Ltd performing?

Cyient DLM Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 7 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 34.5% and profit rose 128.6% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 21 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.

What stage is Cyient DLM Ltd in?

Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves, ROCE holding at 11.3% — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −11.8% latest, profit growth +26.6% latest, eps growth +26.3% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Cyient DLM Ltd in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 7 of stage 2), trading +49.3% versus its 200-day average and at 100% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Cyient DLM Ltd beating the market?

On recent form, yes — Cyient DLM Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 21 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 3.0 years the stock moved +34% against the NIFTY 500's +38% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.

Will Cyient DLM Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Cyient DLM Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹670, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 7 weeks in. Its P/E of 64.8× sits at the 51st percentile of its own 3-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.

Who owns Cyient DLM Ltd?

Promoters hold 52.1% of Cyient DLM Ltd, foreign institutions 0.2%, domestic institutions 29.2% and the public 18.4% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters cut 14.5 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Cyient DLM Ltd have too much debt?

No — Cyient DLM Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.17, and operating profit covers the interest bill 5×. FY26 borrowings were ₹172 Cr against equity of ₹1,012 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Cyient DLM Ltd's capex?

Cyient DLM Ltd spent ₹294 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹48.0 Cr, with ₹2.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Cyient DLM Ltd's cash flow?

Cyient DLM Ltd generated ₹54.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹6.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹48.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹73.0 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Cyient DLM Ltd's profit real cash?

Not fully — over the last 3 fiscal years, −39% of Cyient DLM Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹54.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹73.0 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into the working-capital cycle. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.

Where is Cyient DLM Ltd in its business cycle?

Cyient DLM Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 10.0%, against a 8-year band of 3.0%–12.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 10.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.

What could break the Cyient DLM Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −39% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Cyient DLM Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Cyient DLM Ltd's three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: whether the cash starts following the profit. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI