Project Consultancy/Turnkey Stocks in India
Project Consultancy/Turnkey: Power Mech Projects Ltd owns the largest revenue base; SEPC Ltd has the fastest current growth.
Nifty Project Consultancy/Turnkey Index — Constituents & Performance
The Project Consultancy/Turnkey companies below are the listed Indian Project Consultancy/Turnkey universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Project Consultancy/Turnkey index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.
How has Project Consultancy/Turnkey moved against NIFTY 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 51% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 18% on average over the last four reported quarters.
RS — · 1/3 >200d (+0) · 0/3 lead (−2) · EPS 2/3↑
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 3 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Is Project Consultancy/Turnkey outperforming NIFTY 500?
Project Consultancy/Turnkey has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 30.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 10.8%. 1 of 3 covered companies currently beats NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is broad. Power Mech Projects Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +7.2%.
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Project Consultancy/Turnkey has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 30.7% over 52 weeks and 10.8% over 13 weeks. 1 of 3 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 2 of 3 beat the sector itself. Power Mech Projects Ltd leads with revenue of ₹6,062 crore, based on 3 of 3 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Power Mech Projects LtdPOWERMECH | 61.9/100Mixed-positive evidence73% evidence | TURNING | 17.9/35 Revenue 15.8% · PAT 18.1% · OPM change -1 pp 95% evidence | 19.6/25 ROCE 21.8% · OPM 11% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 22.3× · PEG — 35% evidence | 15.5/20 RS sector 7.2% · RS bench 2% · 1Y -15.9%9 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.9 + 19.6 + 8.9 + 15.5 = 61.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2Om Infra LtdOMINFRAL | 41.8/100Mixed-negative evidence84% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.3/35 Revenue -29.8% · PAT -42.7% · OPM change 19.3 pp 95% evidence | 7.0/25 ROCE 4.7% · OPM 9.8% 95% evidence | 8.3/20 P/E 41.8× · PEG — 35% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector 3% · RS bench -9.4% · 1Y -27.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.3 + 7 + 8.3 + 13.2 = 41.8 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is -9.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 3SEPC LtdSEPC | 38.0/100Mixed-negative evidence77% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.2/35 Revenue 76.3% · PAT 100% · OPM change -9.3 pp 95% evidence | 4.8/25 ROCE 5% · OPM 3.7% 95% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 20.8× · PEG — 0% evidence | 0.0/20 RS sector -24% · RS bench -34% · 1Y -49.3%4 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.2 + 4.8 + 10 + 0 = 38 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -24% and the one-year return is -49.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
Market action
Power Mech Projects Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Project Consultancy/Turnkey at -15.9%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +2%. 1 of 3 covered companies is above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-31.
Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind NIFTY 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS NIFTY 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Project Consultancy/Turnkey itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Power Mech Projects Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 3 Project Consultancy/Turnkey companies compared here, at ₹6,062 crore. SEPC Ltd is next at ₹1,054 crore. SEPC Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 76.3%, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Power Mech Projects Ltd is the scale leader at ₹6,062 crore, 475.1% ahead of SEPC Ltd. SEPC Ltd's growth is 76.3% from a ₹1,054 crore base, with 14 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
Investor read: Power Mech Projects Ltd is the scale benchmark; SEPC Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Power Mech Projects Ltd's growth falls below SEPC Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Mech Projects Ltd POWERMECH | ₹2.1K Cr | 14% | Mar 2026 |
| SEPC Ltd SEPC⚠ unverified | ₹274 Cr | 132% | Mar 2026 |
| Om Infra Ltd OMINFRAL⚠ unverified | ₹160 Cr | -6.9% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Power Mech Projects Ltd · POWERMECH
SEPC Ltd · SEPC⚠ unverified
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Om Infra Ltd · OMINFRAL⚠ unverified
Power Mech Projects Ltd · POWERMECH
SEPC Ltd · SEPC⚠ unverified
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
Power Mech Projects Ltd has the highest OPM among the 3 Project Consultancy/Turnkey companies compared here, at 11%. Om Infra Ltd is next at 9.8%. Om Infra Ltd has the highest Margin change at +19.3 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Power Mech Projects Ltd leads opm at 11%; Om Infra Ltd leads margin change at +19.3 percentage points.
Investor read: Power Mech Projects Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Mech Projects Ltd POWERMECH | 11% | −1.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Om Infra Ltd OMINFRAL⚠ unverified | 9.8% | +19.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| SEPC Ltd SEPC⚠ unverified | 3.7% | −9.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Om Infra Ltd · OMINFRAL⚠ unverified
Power Mech Projects Ltd · POWERMECH
SEPC Ltd · SEPC⚠ unverified
Margin change · reported quarter history
Om Infra Ltd · OMINFRAL⚠ unverified
Power Mech Projects Ltd · POWERMECH
SEPC Ltd · SEPC⚠ unverified
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Power Mech Projects Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 3 Project Consultancy/Turnkey companies compared here, at ₹412 crore. SEPC Ltd is next at ₹54 crore. SEPC Ltd has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Power Mech Projects Ltd leads with ₹412 crore of TTM profit, 663% above SEPC Ltd. SEPC Ltd shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (125% uncapped) growth from a ₹54 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
Investor read: Power Mech Projects Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Mech Projects Ltd POWERMECH | ₹153 Cr | 18% | Mar 2026 |
| SEPC Ltd SEPC⚠ unverified | ₹14 Cr | 40% | Mar 2026 |
| Om Infra Ltd OMINFRAL⚠ unverified | ₹6 Cr | -56% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Om Infra Ltd · OMINFRAL⚠ unverified
Power Mech Projects Ltd · POWERMECH
SEPC Ltd · SEPC⚠ unverified
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Om Infra Ltd · OMINFRAL⚠ unverified
Power Mech Projects Ltd · POWERMECH
SEPC Ltd · SEPC⚠ unverified
Return On Capital Employed
Power Mech Projects Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 3 Project Consultancy/Turnkey companies compared here, at 21.8%. SEPC Ltd is next at 5%. SEPC Ltd has the highest ROCE change at +0.8 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 3 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Power Mech Projects Ltd leads ROCE at 21.8%, 16.8 percentage points above SEPC Ltd. SEPC Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +0.8 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
Investor read: Power Mech Projects Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
Withheld from this chart: Power Mech Projects Ltd (POWERMECH) — its two data sources disagree by up to 35% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEPC Ltd SEPC⚠ unverified | 3.3% | +0.8 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Om Infra Ltd OMINFRAL⚠ unverified | 2.6% | −0.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Om Infra Ltd · OMINFRAL⚠ unverified
SEPC Ltd · SEPC⚠ unverified
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Om Infra Ltd · OMINFRAL⚠ unverified
SEPC Ltd · SEPC⚠ unverified
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
No company in this Project Consultancy/Turnkey comparison reports a valuation figure this section can compare, so the PEG rank is empty. On P/E, SEPC Ltd is lowest at 20.8×, across 3 of 3 companies with a usable reading. PEG asks what price is being paid for growth; P/E keeps that answer anchored to the actual earnings multiple.
What the numbers say: There is not enough comparable evidence to name a reliable peg leader.
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Mech Projects Ltd POWERMECH | — | 17.0 | Mar 2026 |
| SEPC Ltd SEPC⚠ unverified | — | 19.9 | Mar 2026 |
| Om Infra Ltd OMINFRAL⚠ unverified | — | 28.0 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
No consistent historical series is available for peg.
P/E · reported quarter history
Om Infra Ltd · OMINFRAL⚠ unverified
Power Mech Projects Ltd · POWERMECH
SEPC Ltd · SEPC⚠ unverified
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Project Consultancy/Turnkey comparison names 7 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 3 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 2 draw at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check. 1 has second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 2 companies draw at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; they are marked unverified wherever those figures appear.
- 1 company is missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
- Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 3 Project Consultancy/Turnkey companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Mar 2026 and market data through 2026-07-31. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.
Project Consultancy/Turnkey company comparison FAQs
These 21 answers restate the Project Consultancy/Turnkey comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 3 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Mar 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-31. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Project Consultancy/Turnkey sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
Project Consultancy/Turnkey has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 30.7% over 52 weeks and 10.8% over 13 weeks. 1 of 3 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 2 of 3 beat the sector itself.
Which Project Consultancy/Turnkey company is largest by revenue?
Power Mech Projects Ltd leads with revenue of ₹6,062 crore, based on 3 of 3 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Project Consultancy/Turnkey company is growing fastest?
SEPC Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 76.3%, across 3 of 3 comparable companies.
Which Project Consultancy/Turnkey company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Power Mech Projects Ltd ranks first at 61.9/100 with 73.3% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
How much history does this Project Consultancy/Turnkey comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Mar 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
What is the Nifty Project Consultancy/Turnkey index?
The Nifty Project Consultancy/Turnkey index tracks India's listed Project Consultancy/Turnkey companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 3 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Project Consultancy/Turnkey sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Mar 2026.
Which are the best Project Consultancy/Turnkey stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Power Mech Projects Ltd places first among 3 listed Project Consultancy/Turnkey companies, followed by Om Infra Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Mar 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many Project Consultancy/Turnkey stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 3 listed Project Consultancy/Turnkey companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Mar 2026.
Which Project Consultancy/Turnkey company is the biggest?
Power Mech Projects Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹6,062 crore, ahead of SEPC Ltd at ₹1,054 crore. That covers 3 of 3 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Project Consultancy/Turnkey company has the best profit margins?
Power Mech Projects Ltd has the highest operating margin at 11%, from 3 of 3 comparable companies. Om Infra Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +19.3 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Project Consultancy/Turnkey company makes the most profit?
Power Mech Projects Ltd earns the most, at ₹412 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 3 of 3 comparable companies. SEPC Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Project Consultancy/Turnkey company earns the highest return on capital?
Power Mech Projects Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 21.8%, across 3 of 3 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Is the Project Consultancy/Turnkey sector beating the market?
Project Consultancy/Turnkey has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 30.7% over the last 52 weeks and 10.8% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 1 of 3 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Project Consultancy/Turnkey stock has the strongest price momentum?
Power Mech Projects Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Project Consultancy/Turnkey company scores highest for research priority?
Power Mech Projects Ltd scores 61.9 out of 100 with 73.3% evidence confidence, from 17.9 points on growth and earnings, 19.6 on capital efficiency, 8.9 on valuation and 15.5 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Project Consultancy/Turnkey companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 3 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Mar 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Project Consultancy/Turnkey sector?
The 3 Project Consultancy/Turnkey companies on this page carry ₹10,108 crore of combined market value. Power Mech Projects Ltd is the largest at ₹8,114 crore, about 80% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-05.
How is the Project Consultancy/Turnkey sector performing?
1 of the 3 covered Project Consultancy/Turnkey companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 30.7% behind NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-05.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.