Ternium S.A.
TXTernium S.A.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it.
Biggest watch item: the P/E sits at the 74th percentile of its own range — the multiple has already done part of the work.
The price is in a confirmed uptrend (35 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 74th percentile of its own 4-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +164.3% year on year, and 460% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: the next one or two quarters of delivery.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Ternium S.A. trades at $50.3, in a confirmed uptrend and 35 weeks into that stage. That is +20.3% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 100% of a 52-week range of $32 to $50. On relative strength it has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 4 straight weeks.
Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 35 of stage 2. At $50.3 it trades +20.3% versus its 200-day average and sits at 100% of its 52-week range ($32–$50).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +161% while the S&P 500 moved +263% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 4 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
Valuation P/E is the price of $1 of annual profit: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar the company earns in a year.
Ternium S.A. trades at 17.3× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (74th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 11.4×, measured across 4.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 17.3× is at the pricey end of its own range (74th percentile), against a long-run median of 11.4× measured over 4.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +7.0%/yr price move, ~−21.8%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+28.8 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.
Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
Stage: Improving Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Ternium S.A. reads as improving on its fundamental arc. Improving — profit growth bottomed 3 quarters ago at −100.4% and has held its recovery at +76.5%, ROCE holding at 4.3%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.
Why it matters: a sustained climb off the trough is the setup this page is built to catch — the question moves to what you pay for it.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | −11.6% | −1.7% | — | — |
| Profit | +76.5% | −47.6% | — | — |
| EPS | — | −37.5% | — | — |
| Stock price | +57.6% | +7.0% | −0.6% | +8.1% |
4-Factor Sector Score
50.7/100 — rank 6 of 13 in Steel · 51% evidence confidence
Ternium S.A. scores 50.7 out of 100 against the 13 companies it is compared with in Steel, ranking 6. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 17.2 + 10.4 + 11.3 + 11.8 = 50.7. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Ternium S.A. reported $3.9 B of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.0% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at −0.8% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $15.6 B. The last four reported quarters add to $15.6 B.
FY25 revenue came in at $15.6 B (−11.6% on the year), capping 4 years at −0.8% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $3.9 B, +0.0% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −6.8% growth against the decade's −0.8% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.
Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −7.1% over the last 4 quarters against −8.8%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising.
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every $100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Ternium S.A.'s operating margin is 7.4% in the Mar 26 quarter, +4.1 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 4.5% to 32.8%. The current quarter sits inside that band.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 7.4%, +4.1 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 4.5%–32.8%.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +4.1 pp year on year while gross margin went +4.1 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Ternium S.A. earned $0.4 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +164.3% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.3 B. The 4-year compound rate is −48.8%. That is 9.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.1 B. 3 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.
Mar 26 profit was $0.4 B, +164.3% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.3 B (+76.5%), and the 4-year compound rate is −48.8%.
Why profit moved: revenue contributed +0.0% and the margin +4.1 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.
Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −94.7% vs revenue −6.8%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 460% of Ternium S.A.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was $2.3 B of operating cash against $0.3 B of profit. After $2.5 B of capital spending, $−0.2 B was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of $2.3 B against reported profit of $0.3 B, leaving free cash of $−0.2 B after $2.5 B of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 460% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
Why: conversion is measured cleanly, but the working-capital day-counts behind it sit below what we hold — the move is shown without inventing its driver.
Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Ternium S.A. does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran $6.0 B over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 12.8% of FY25 revenue a year.
Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.
On the investment side: capital spending of $6.0 B over the last 3 fiscal years.
The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.
Return on equity Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. With the full capital-employed split not in our numbers, ROE is the cleanest long ladder we can draw here.
Ternium S.A. earns a ROE of 2% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 1% in FY24. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −5.5 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 1.9% net margin on 0.66× asset turns.
FY25 ROE is 2%, recovered from a FY24 trough of 1% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 1.9% net margin × 0.66× asset turns × 1.46× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 1.8% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 3.8% − 9.3% = a −5.5 pp spread. The 9.3% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
Dividend A dividend is cash paid out per share. Dividend per share is the declared amount for the period; the trailing twelve-month total is the four most recent quarters added together.
Ternium S.A. paid $4.90 per share over the last four reported quarters, down 27.8% on a year ago. The most recent declaration was $1.30 for Dec 25. Against the current price of $50.3 that is a trailing yield of 9.73%, measured on dividends already paid rather than on a forecast.
Ternium S.A. paid $4.90 per share across the last four reported quarters, most recently $1.30 for Dec 25. That is down 27.8% against the same quarter a year earlier. Against the current price of $50.3 the trailing twelve months work out to 9.73% — trailing dividends measured against today's price, not a forward estimate.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.
Ternium S.A. carries total debt of $3.0 B against shareholder equity of $16.5 B as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.18 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.14 in FY21 to 0.16 in FY25. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.
Mar 26: total debt of $3.0 B against shareholder equity of $16.5 B — a debt-to-equity of 0.18. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.14 (FY21) to 0.16 (FY25). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.
Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.
No ownership or positioning reading is held for Ternium S.A., so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 1.2 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.
We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Ternium S.A.: the Z-score reads 2.37. A Z-score above roughly 3 reads as safe and below roughly 1.8 as the distress zone, so this sits in the grey band between the two. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure.
Why it matters: a Z-score of 2.37 sits in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score reads 2.37.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Friedman Industries, IncorporatedFRD | 68.2/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 23.3/35 Revenue 45.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.7 pp 53% evidence | 11.9/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 6.2% 57% evidence | 16.5/20 P/E 6.4× · PEG 0.32 65% evidence | 16.5/20 RS sector 31.3% · RS bench 41.8% · 1Y 120.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.3 + 11.9 + 16.5 + 16.5 = 68.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 2Nucor CorporationNUE | 66.0/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence | LEADER | 22.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 7.9 pp 32% evidence | 15.2/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 11.7% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 17.6× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.8/20 RS sector 25.1% · RS bench 34.5% · 1Y 97.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 22.2 + 15.2 + 10.8 + 17.8 = 66 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 3Steel Dynamics, Inc.STLD | 58.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | LEADER | 21.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 4 pp 39% evidence | 13.9/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 10.3% 76% evidence | 10.5/20 P/E 20.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.1/20 RS sector 18.5% · RS bench 27.2% · 1Y 115.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.4 + 13.9 + 10.5 + 13.1 = 58.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 4ArcelorMittal S.A.MT | 58.7/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 15.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 39% evidence | 17.7/25 ROCE 21% · OPM 4.9% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 25.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 15.8/20 RS sector 22.3% · RS bench 31.1% · 1Y 123.8%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.2 + 17.7 + 10 + 15.8 = 58.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Reliance, Inc.RS | 57.6/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | BREAKING OUT | 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.2 pp 39% evidence | 12.8/25 ROCE 4.6% · OPM 9.1% 76% evidence | 10.2/20 P/E 21.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.2/20 RS sector 6.6% · RS bench 15.1% · 1Y 45.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.4 + 12.8 + 10.2 + 16.2 = 57.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Ternium S.A.this pageTX | 50.7/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence | TURNING | 17.2/35 Revenue -7.1% · PAT — · OPM change 4 pp 40% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 7.4% 57% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 13.8× · PEG — 15% evidence | 11.8/20 RS sector 3.6% · RS bench 11.9% · 1Y 57.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.2 + 10.4 + 11.3 + 11.8 = 50.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 7Metallus Inc.MTUS | 50.0/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence | TURNING | 18.0/35 Revenue 13.6% · PAT — · OPM change 2 pp 40% evidence | 8.5/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 2.5% 57% evidence | 13.7/20 P/E 233.4× · PEG 0.45 65% evidence | 9.8/20 RS sector -5.5% · RS bench 2.3% · 1Y 31.3%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18 + 8.5 + 13.7 + 9.8 = 50 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 8Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.CLF | 42.1/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence | TURNING | 21.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 7.4 pp 39% evidence | 5.0/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM -4.3% 76% evidence | 9.0/20 P/E 219.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 6.6/20 RS sector -11.6% · RS bench -4% · 1Y 28.8%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21.5 + 5 + 9 + 6.6 = 42.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Mesabi TrustMSB | 33.7/100Adverse evidence65% evidence | BASING | 4.5/35 Revenue -83.5% · PAT -87.1% · OPM change -28.3 pp 83% evidence | 15.9/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 48.4% 76% evidence | 9.5/20 P/E 32.2× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.8/20 RS sector -39.8% · RS bench -34.3% · 1Y -23.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 4.5 + 15.9 + 9.5 + 3.8 = 33.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 10Worthington Steel, Inc.WS | 28.9/100Adverse evidence75% evidence | ASLEEP | 8.3/35 Revenue 11.3% · PAT -96.6% · OPM change -14.2 pp 83% evidence | 5.7/25 ROCE -5.3% · OPM -6.2% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 248.2× · PEG 1.48 65% evidence | 5.3/20 RS sector -12.3% · RS bench -5.3% · 1Y 26.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 8.3 + 5.7 + 9.6 + 5.3 = 28.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 11NWPX Infrastructure, Inc.NWPX | 59.9/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | LEADER | 21.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 4.4 pp 39% evidence | 12.4/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 9.2% 76% evidence | 9.8/20 P/E 30× · PEG — 15% evidence | 16.7/20 RS sector 32.3% · RS bench 41.3% · 1Y 162.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 12.4 + 9.8 + 16.7 = 59.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 12Luda Technology Group LimitedLUD | 39.0/100Thin evidence · provisional32% evidence | 17.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence | 8.9/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM — 46% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 214× · PEG — 15% evidence | 3.0/20 RS sector -44.6% · RS bench -42.8% · 1Y 3.2%2 of 8 weeks ahead to 2026-07-10 70% evidence | |
| Exact sum: 17.8 + 8.9 + 9.3 + 3 = 39 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 13Algoma Steel Group Inc.ASTL | 30.5/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence | BASING | 11.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -24.6 pp 39% evidence | 3.2/25 ROCE -6.5% · OPM -51.7% 76% evidence | 11.0/20 P/E 16.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.5/20 RS sector -19.4% · RS bench -12.6% · 1Y -7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 11.8 + 3.2 + 11 + 4.5 = 30.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Frequently asked questions
What is Ternium S.A.'s stock price today?
Ternium S.A. trades at $50.3, +57.6% over the past year. The company is valued at $10.0 B. The stock sits at 100% of its 52-week range of $32–$50, +20.3% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 35 weeks in. — as of 5 August 2026.
What were Ternium S.A.'s latest quarterly results?
Ternium S.A. reported revenue of $3.9 B and net profit of $0.4 B for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 0.0% and profit rose 164.3% year on year. Earnings per share were $1.10. The operating margin was 7.4%, 4.1 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ternium S.A.'s revenue?
Ternium S.A. reported revenue of $3.9 B in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.0% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was $15.6 B (−11.6%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at −0.8% a year. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ternium S.A.'s profit?
Ternium S.A. earned $0.4 B of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +164.3% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.3 B. The operating margin ran 7.4% in the latest quarter. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ternium S.A.'s market cap?
Ternium S.A.'s market capitalisation is $10.0 B at a stock price of $50.3. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ternium S.A.'s P/E ratio?
Ternium S.A. trades at a P/E of 17.3×, at the 74th percentile of its own 4-year range, against a long-run median of 11.4×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Ternium S.A. pay a dividend?
Yes — Ternium S.A. declared $1.30 per share for Dec 25, and $4.90 per share across the last four reported quarters. The latest quarter is down 27.8% on the same quarter a year earlier. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ternium S.A.'s dividend per share?
Ternium S.A.'s most recently declared dividend is $1.30 per share for Dec 25, giving $4.90 per share over the trailing twelve months. Each figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters for the trailing total. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ternium S.A.'s dividend yield?
Ternium S.A.'s trailing dividend yield is 9.73%: $4.90 declared per share across the last four reported quarters, against a share price of $50.3. Each quarter’s figure is the amount declared for that quarter as reported, added across four quarters and divided by the latest close. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Ternium S.A. overvalued?
On its own history, Ternium S.A. looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 17.3× sits at the 74th percentile of its 4-year range (long-run median 11.4×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Ternium S.A. growing?
Yes — Ternium S.A. is growing: latest-quarter revenue +0.0% year on year, profit +164.3%, and the margin +4.1 pp at 7.4%. The 4-year compound rates are −0.8% (revenue) and −48.8% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 5 August 2026.
How is Ternium S.A. performing?
Ternium S.A. is in a confirmed uptrend, 35 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 0.0% and profit rose 164.3% year on year. Against the S&P 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 4 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 5 August 2026.
What stage is Ternium S.A. in?
Improving — profit growth bottomed 3 quarters ago at −100.4% and has held its recovery at +76.5%, ROCE holding at 4.3%. The read comes from the last 12 quarters of growth (revenue growth −7.1% latest, profit growth +76.5% latest, eps growth +614.6% latest) plus the ROCE curve, classified by deterministic rules — a trajectory read, not a buy or sell call — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Ternium S.A. in an uptrend?
Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 35 of stage 2), trading +20.3% versus its 200-day average and at 100% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Ternium S.A. beating the market?
On recent form, yes — Ternium S.A. has been ahead of the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 4 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +161% against the S&P 500's +263% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 5 August 2026.
Will Ternium S.A.'s stock price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Ternium S.A. What it measures instead: the stock price is $50.3, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 35 weeks in. Its P/E of 17.3× sits at the 74th percentile of its own 4-year range. — as of 5 August 2026.
Does Ternium S.A. have too much debt?
No — Ternium S.A.'s debt-to-equity is 0.18. A year-by-year borrowings ladder is not in our numbers for this stock, so the latest reading is the cleanest hold. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ternium S.A.'s capex?
Ternium S.A. spent $6.0 B on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was $2.5 B. — as of 5 August 2026.
What is Ternium S.A.'s cash flow?
Ternium S.A. generated $2.3 B of operating cash flow in FY25 and $−0.2 B of free cash flow after $2.5 B of capital spending. Reported profit that year was $0.3 B, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Ternium S.A.'s profit real cash?
Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 460% of Ternium S.A.'s reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was $2.3 B against reported profit of $0.3 B. The cash then goes mostly into building capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 5 August 2026.
How financially safe is Ternium S.A.?
On the balance sheet, the Z-score reads 2.37 — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the distress zone. That is in the grey band — neither clearly safe nor clearly distressed. — as of 5 August 2026.
Where is Ternium S.A. in its business cycle?
Ternium S.A.'s FY25 operating margin was 4.5%, against a 5-year band of 4.5%–32.8%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran 7.4%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 5 August 2026.
What could break the Ternium S.A. story?
Biggest watch item: the P/E sits at the 74th percentile of its own range — the multiple has already done part of the work. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 5 August 2026.
Is Ternium S.A. a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Ternium S.A.'s three tracks disagree. Price, valuation and the earnings engine each tell a different story — the next quarter or two settles it. The sharpest open question: the next one or two quarters of delivery. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 5 August 2026.