Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-04
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Steel Stocks

Steel: Ternium S.A. owns the largest revenue base; Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Steel moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 9% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 14% on average over the last four reported quarters.

BASING · +3 joined~Moving with the index8 of 16 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 11/16 >200d (+1) · 8/16 lead (+3) · EPS 10/16↑

20030020262025202420232022 357348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100Mar 22Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 11 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 13 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 74, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 14 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 49, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 15 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 34, against 100 at the start · down 65.7% on a year ago · 13 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 36, against 100 at the start · down 68.4% on a year ago · 15 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 40, against 100 at the start · down 64.0% on a year ago · 16 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 32, against 100 at the start · down 43.7% on a year ago · 15 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 27, against 100 at the start · down 23.3% on a year ago · 15 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 29, against 100 at the start · down 32.6% on a year ago · 15 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 20, against 100 at the start · down 38.3% on a year ago · 15 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 19, against 100 at the start · down 35.8% on a year ago · 15 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 13, against 100 at the start · down 47.9% on a year ago · 14 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 20, against 100 at the start · down 30.2% on a year ago · 15 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 20, against 100 at the start · down 24.9% on a year ago · 15 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 24, against 100 at the start · down 13.7% on a year ago · 16 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 17, against 100 at the start · up 11.7% on a year ago · 14 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two17 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
20030020262025202420232022 357348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100Mar 22Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 11 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 13 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 74, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 14 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 49, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 15 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 34, against 100 at the start · down 65.7% on a year ago · 13 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 36, against 100 at the start · down 68.4% on a year ago · 15 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 40, against 100 at the start · down 64.0% on a year ago · 16 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 32, against 100 at the start · down 43.7% on a year ago · 15 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 27, against 100 at the start · down 23.3% on a year ago · 15 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 29, against 100 at the start · down 32.6% on a year ago · 15 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 20, against 100 at the start · down 38.3% on a year ago · 15 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 19, against 100 at the start · down 35.8% on a year ago · 15 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 13, against 100 at the start · down 47.9% on a year ago · 14 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 20, against 100 at the start · down 30.2% on a year ago · 15 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 20, against 100 at the start · down 24.9% on a year ago · 15 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 24, against 100 at the start · down 13.7% on a year ago · 16 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 17, against 100 at the start · up 11.7% on a year ago · 14 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two17No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Steel, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 16 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Steel outperforming S&P 500?

Steel has outperformed S&P 500 by 30.6% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 1.5%. 8 of 13 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +32.3%.

-1.5%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+30.6%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
8/13Stocks leading S&P 500
7/13Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Steel has outperformed S&P 500 by 30.6% over 52 weeks and 1.5% over 13 weeks. 8 of 13 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 7 of 13 beat the sector itself. Ternium S.A. leads with revenue of $15,611 million, based on 5 of 13 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Companies
13
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$199.6B
Nucor Corporation
Revenue growing
3/5
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
8/13
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 13
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 59.9% evidence confidence.
ArcelorMittal S.A. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Friedman Industries, IncorporatedFRD 68.2/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence BREAKING OUT 23.3/35 Revenue 45.4% · PAT 100% · OPM change 1.7 pp 53% evidence 11.9/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 6.2% 57% evidence 16.5/20 P/E 6.4× · PEG 0.32 65% evidence 16.5/20 RS sector 31.3% · RS bench 41.8% · 1Y 120.5%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 23.3 + 11.9 + 16.5 + 16.5 = 68.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
2Nucor CorporationNUE 66.0/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence LEADER 22.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 7.9 pp 32% evidence 15.2/25 ROCE 5.3% · OPM 11.7% 76% evidence 10.8/20 P/E 17.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 17.8/20 RS sector 25.1% · RS bench 34.5% · 1Y 97.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 22.2 + 15.2 + 10.8 + 17.8 = 66 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3Steel Dynamics, Inc.STLD 58.9/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence LEADER 21.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 4 pp 39% evidence 13.9/25 ROCE 4.9% · OPM 10.3% 76% evidence 10.5/20 P/E 20.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.1/20 RS sector 18.5% · RS bench 27.2% · 1Y 115.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.4 + 13.9 + 10.5 + 13.1 = 58.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4ArcelorMittal S.A.MT 58.7/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence TURNING 15.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -0.7 pp 39% evidence 17.7/25 ROCE 21% · OPM 4.9% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E 25.5× · PEG — 15% evidence 15.8/20 RS sector 22.3% · RS bench 31.1% · 1Y 123.8%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 15.2 + 17.7 + 10 + 15.8 = 58.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Reliance, Inc.RS 57.6/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence BREAKING OUT 18.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 1.2 pp 39% evidence 12.8/25 ROCE 4.6% · OPM 9.1% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 21.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.2/20 RS sector 6.6% · RS bench 15.1% · 1Y 45.6%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18.4 + 12.8 + 10.2 + 16.2 = 57.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Ternium S.A.TX 50.7/100Thin evidence · provisional51% evidence TURNING 17.2/35 Revenue -7.1% · PAT — · OPM change 4 pp 40% evidence 10.4/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 7.4% 57% evidence 11.3/20 P/E 13.8× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.8/20 RS sector 3.6% · RS bench 11.9% · 1Y 57.3%5 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 17.2 + 10.4 + 11.3 + 11.8 = 50.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Metallus Inc.MTUS 50.0/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence TURNING 18.0/35 Revenue 13.6% · PAT — · OPM change 2 pp 40% evidence 8.5/25 ROCE 0.9% · OPM 2.5% 57% evidence 13.7/20 P/E 233.4× · PEG 0.45 65% evidence 9.8/20 RS sector -5.5% · RS bench 2.3% · 1Y 31.3%7 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 18 + 8.5 + 13.7 + 9.8 = 50 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
8Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.CLF 42.1/100Thin evidence · provisional56% evidence TURNING 21.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 7.4 pp 39% evidence 5.0/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM -4.3% 76% evidence 9.0/20 P/E 219.9× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.6/20 RS sector -11.6% · RS bench -4% · 1Y 28.8%8 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 21.5 + 5 + 9 + 6.6 = 42.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9Mesabi TrustMSB 33.7/100Adverse evidence65% evidence BASING 4.5/35 Revenue -83.5% · PAT -87.1% · OPM change -28.3 pp 83% evidence 15.9/25 ROCE 5.7% · OPM 48.4% 76% evidence 9.5/20 P/E 32.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.8/20 RS sector -39.8% · RS bench -34.3% · 1Y -23.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 4.5 + 15.9 + 9.5 + 3.8 = 33.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
10Worthington Steel, Inc.WS 28.9/100Adverse evidence75% evidence ASLEEP 8.3/35 Revenue 11.3% · PAT -96.6% · OPM change -14.2 pp 83% evidence 5.7/25 ROCE -5.3% · OPM -6.2% 76% evidence 9.6/20 P/E 248.2× · PEG 1.48 65% evidence 5.3/20 RS sector -12.3% · RS bench -5.3% · 1Y 26.5%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 8.3 + 5.7 + 9.6 + 5.3 = 28.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
11NWPX Infrastructure, Inc.NWPX 59.9/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence LEADER 21.0/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 4.4 pp 39% evidence 12.4/25 ROCE 4% · OPM 9.2% 76% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 30× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.7/20 RS sector 32.3% · RS bench 41.3% · 1Y 162.2%12 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 21 + 12.4 + 9.8 + 16.7 = 59.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12Luda Technology Group LimitedLUD 39.0/100Thin evidence · provisional32% evidence 17.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 9% evidence 8.9/25 ROCE -0.3% · OPM — 46% evidence 9.3/20 P/E 214× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -44.6% · RS bench -42.8% · 1Y 3.2%2 of 8 weeks ahead to 2026-07-10 70% evidence
Exact sum: 17.8 + 8.9 + 9.3 + 3 = 39 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Algoma Steel Group Inc.ASTL 30.5/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence BASING 11.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -24.6 pp 39% evidence 3.2/25 ROCE -6.5% · OPM -51.7% 76% evidence 11.0/20 P/E 16.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 4.5/20 RS sector -19.4% · RS bench -12.6% · 1Y -7%3 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 11.8 + 3.2 + 11 + 4.5 = 30.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
Showing 10 of 13 companies
04 · what price has already done

Market action

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Steel at +162.2%. Friedman Industries, Incorporated leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +41.8%. 8 of 13 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Ternium S.A. has the highest Revenue among the 13 Steel companies compared here, at $15,611 million. Worthington Steel, Inc. is next at $3,444 million. Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the highest Revenue growth at 45.4%, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Ternium S.A. is the scale leader at $15,611 million, 353.3% ahead of Worthington Steel, Inc.. Friedman Industries, Incorporated's growth is 45.4% from a $647 million base, with 18 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderTernium S.A. · $15,611 million
Gap353.3% versus #2 · Worthington Steel, Inc.
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/13 companies · 220 observations

Investor read: Ternium S.A. is the scale benchmark; Friedman Industries, Incorporated is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Ternium S.A.'s growth falls below Friedman Industries, Incorporated's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Ternium S.A. TX · older report$15.6B
3Metallus Inc. MTUS · older report$1.2B
4Friedman Industries, Incorporated FRD · older report$647M
5Mesabi Trust MSB$16M
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Friedman Industries, Incorporated FRD · older report45%
2Metallus Inc. MTUS · older report14%
4Ternium S.A. TX · older report-7.1%
5Mesabi Trust MSB-84%
Revenue · company comparison
5/13 level · 5/13 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
ArcelorMittal S.A. MT$15.5B4.5%Jun 2026
Nucor Corporation NUE$9.5B21%Sep 2026
Steel Dynamics, Inc. STLD$5.2B19%Jun 2026
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. CLF$4.9B6.3%Jun 2026
Reliance, Inc. RS$4.0B16%Jun 2026
Ternium S.A. TX$3.9B0.0%Mar 2026
Worthington Steel, Inc. WS$929M12%Jun 2026
Metallus Inc. MTUS$308M9.6%Mar 2026
Algoma Steel Group Inc. ASTL$297M-43%Jun 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated FRD$192M49%Mar 2026
NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. NWPX$138M19%Jun 2026
Luda Technology Group Limited LUD$16M-20%Dec 2025
Mesabi Trust MSB$2M-60%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Algoma Steel Group Inc. · ASTL

$1.1B
$942M
$934M
$599M
$568M
$677M
$827M
$733M
$615M
$621M
$651M
$600M
$590M
$517M
$590M
$524M
$455M
$297M

ArcelorMittal S.A. · MT

$20.8B
$21.8B
$22.1B
$19.0B
$16.9B
$18.5B
$18.6B
$16.6B
$14.6B
$16.3B
$16.2B
$15.2B
$14.7B
$14.8B
$15.9B
$15.7B
$15.0B
$15.5B

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. · CLF

$5.3B
$6.0B
$6.3B
$5.7B
$5.0B
$5.3B
$6.0B
$5.6B
$5.1B
$5.2B
$5.1B
$4.6B
$4.3B
$4.6B
$4.9B
$4.7B
$4.3B
$4.9B

Friedman Industries, Incorporated · FRD

$52M
$75M
$162M
$150M
$112M
$124M
$137M
$131M
$116M
$132M
$115M
$107M
$94M
$129M
$135M
$152M
$168M
$192M

Mesabi Trust · MSB

$16M
$18M
$14M
$-4M
$0M
$-2M
$2M
$10M
$5M
$6M
$6M
$6M
$79M
$7M
$5M
$6M
$4M
$4M
$2M

Metallus Inc. · MTUS

$338M
$352M
$416M
$317M
$245M
$324M
$357M
$354M
$328M
$322M
$295M
$227M
$241M
$281M
$305M
$306M
$267M
$308M

Nucor Corporation · NUE

$10.3B
$10.5B
$11.8B
$10.5B
$8.7B
$9.5B
$7.7B
$8.1B
$8.1B
$7.4B
$7.1B
$7.8B
$8.5B
$8.5B
$9.5B

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · NWPX

$103M
$109M
$119M
$123M
$107M
$99M
$116M
$119M
$110M
$113M
$130M
$130M
$120M
$116M
$133M
$151M
$126M
$138M

Reliance, Inc. · RS

$4.0B
$4.5B
$4.7B
$4.2B
$3.6B
$4.0B
$3.9B
$3.6B
$3.3B
$3.6B
$3.6B
$3.4B
$3.1B
$3.5B
$3.7B
$3.7B
$3.5B
$4.0B

Steel Dynamics, Inc. · STLD

$5.3B
$5.6B
$6.2B
$5.7B
$4.8B
$4.9B
$5.1B
$4.6B
$4.2B
$4.7B
$4.6B
$4.3B
$3.9B
$4.4B
$4.6B
$4.8B
$4.4B
$5.2B

Ternium S.A. · TX

$4.3B
$4.3B
$4.4B
$4.1B
$3.5B
$3.6B
$3.9B
$5.2B
$4.9B
$4.8B
$4.5B
$4.5B
$3.9B
$3.9B
$3.9B
$4.0B
$3.8B
$3.9B

Worthington Steel, Inc. · WS

$1.1B
$868M
$781M
$884M
$906M
$808M
$806M
$911M
$834M
$739M
$687M
$833M
$873M
$872M
$770M
$929M

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Algoma Steel Group Inc. · ASTL

18%
-41%
-47%
-28%
-11%
22%
8.3%
-8.3%
-21%
-18%
-4.1%
-17%
-9.4%
-13%
-23%
-43%

ArcelorMittal S.A. · MT

-19%
-15%
-16%
-12%
-14%
-12%
-13%
-8.6%
1.1%
-9.1%
-2.0%
3.0%
1.8%
4.5%

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. · CLF

26%
-5.9%
-5.7%
-11%
-5.6%
-0.9%
1.4%
-1.8%
-15%
-18%
-15%
-11%
-3.1%
3.6%
-0.3%
6.3%

Friedman Industries, Incorporated · FRD

145%
61%
115%
65%
-15%
-13%
3.6%
6.5%
-16%
-18%
-19%
-2.3%
17%
42%
79%
49%

Mesabi Trust · MSB

-114%
-100%
-111%
-86%
200%
-40%
1,480%
17%
-17%
0.0%
-95%
-43%
-60%

Metallus Inc. · MTUS

27%
-7.9%
-28%
-8.0%
-14%
12%
34%
-0.6%
-17%
-36%
-27%
-13%
3.4%
35%
11%
9.6%

Nucor Corporation · NUE

34%
1.8%
-17%
-19%
-27%
-7.3%
-22%
-8.2%
-3.1%
14%
20%
21%

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · NWPX

61%
45%
3.9%
-9.2%
-2.5%
-3.3%
2.8%
14%
12%
9.2%
9.1%
2.7%
2.3%
16%
5.0%
19%

Reliance, Inc. · RS

37%
10%
-9.5%
-12%
-17%
-15%
-7.6%
-8.1%
-6.1%
-5.6%
-6.3%
-4.4%
0.5%
6.8%
12%
16%

Steel Dynamics, Inc. · STLD

39%
11%
-9.1%
-12%
-18%
-19%
-12%
-4.1%
-8.8%
-5.3%
-8.5%
-6.9%
-1.5%
11%
14%
19%

Ternium S.A. · TX

13%
-10%
-18%
-16%
-13%
26%
39%
32%
17%
-14%
-21%
-18%
-13%
-12%
-2.6%
0.0%

Worthington Steel, Inc. · WS

-16%
-6.9%
3.2%
3.1%
-8.0%
-8.5%
-15%
-8.6%
4.7%
18%
12%
12%
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Mesabi Trust has the highest OPM among the 13 Steel companies compared here, at 48.4%. Nucor Corporation is next at 11.7%. Nucor Corporation has the highest Margin change at +7.9 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 12 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Mesabi Trust leads opm at 48.4%; Nucor Corporation leads margin change at +7.9 percentage points.

LeaderMesabi Trust · 48.4%
Gap313.7% versus #2 · Nucor Corporation
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/13 companies · 212 observations

Investor read: Mesabi Trust sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Margin changefastest expanders
1Nucor Corporation NUE+7.9 pp
5Ternium S.A. TX · older report+4.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
12/13 level · 12/13 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Mesabi Trust MSB48%−28.3 ppJun 2026
Nucor Corporation NUE12%+7.9 ppSep 2026
Steel Dynamics, Inc. STLD10%+4.0 ppJun 2026
NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. NWPX9.2%+4.4 ppJun 2026
Reliance, Inc. RS9.1%+1.2 ppJun 2026
Ternium S.A. TX7.4%+4.0 ppMar 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated FRD6.2%+1.7 ppMar 2026
ArcelorMittal S.A. MT4.9%−0.7 ppJun 2026
Metallus Inc. MTUS2.5%+2.0 ppMar 2026
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. CLF-4.3%+7.4 ppJun 2026
Worthington Steel, Inc. WS-6.2%−14.2 ppJun 2026
Algoma Steel Group Inc. ASTL-52%−24.6 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Algoma Steel Group Inc. · ASTL

42%
33%
35%
0.9%
-12%
3.2%
20%
5.0%
-6.0%
0.5%
-1.9%
-14%
-21%
-27%
-14%
-124%
-99%
-52%

ArcelorMittal S.A. · MT

22%
20%
20%
8.7%
-1.8%
6.4%
10%
7.2%
-14%
6.6%
6.4%
4.4%
3.6%
5.6%
12%
3.5%
2.2%
4.9%

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. · CLF

21%
18%
13%
3.3%
-3.6%
-0.6%
8.1%
5.8%
-2.3%
-0.7%
0.1%
-5.7%
-11%
-12%
-10%
-4.3%
-7.7%
-4.3%

Friedman Industries, Incorporated · FRD

-11%
-5.7%
7.6%
0.0%
1.3%
5.8%
7.5%
0.8%
5.3%
5.2%
-1.2%
-0.2%
-1.3%
4.5%
5.2%
1.9%
2.3%
6.2%

Mesabi Trust · MSB

98%
100%
96%
111%
-489%
100%
55%
93%
84%
100%
56%
83%
99%
100%
77%
85%
77%
100%
48%

Metallus Inc. · MTUS

18%
16%
25%
-4.0%
-2.2%
8.7%
11%
9.3%
0.5%
8.5%
1.3%
-4.2%
-7.1%
0.5%
3.6%
3.1%
-7.9%
2.5%

Nucor Corporation · NUE

28%
28%
30%
22%
19%
22%
14%
15%
11%
5.3%
5.5%
3.8%
11%
10%
12%

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · NWPX

3.0%
5.0%
12%
12%
10%
4.8%
9.9%
7.6%
7.8%
7.7%
11%
12%
8.8%
4.8%
9.9%
13%
10%
9.2%

Reliance, Inc. · RS

14%
16%
17%
13%
13%
13%
13%
11%
9.7%
11%
9.7%
8.0%
4.5%
7.9%
8.5%
7.1%
4.8%
9.1%

Steel Dynamics, Inc. · STLD

27%
27%
26%
22%
16%
17%
21%
16%
12%
16%
12%
9.1%
6.1%
6.3%
8.4%
11%
7.0%
10%

Ternium S.A. · TX

31%
25%
24%
13%
1.2%
9.9%
19%
10%
12%
14%
8.2%
3.9%
1.1%
3.4%
5.0%
5.4%
4.2%
7.4%

Worthington Steel, Inc. · WS

3.8%
-2.3%
1.2%
10%
7.7%
-1.1%
8.2%
7.4%
5.2%
2.6%
2.7%
8.0%
5.5%
2.5%
0.4%
-6.2%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Algoma Steel Group Inc. · ASTL

+3.2 pp
−38.9 pp
−53.5 pp
−29.8 pp
−15.3 pp
+4.1 pp
+5.6 pp
−2.7 pp
−21.8 pp
−18.9 pp
−15.1 pp
−27.6 pp
−12.5 pp
−110.5 pp
−77.7 pp
−24.6 pp

ArcelorMittal S.A. · MT

−23.7 pp
−13.9 pp
−10.0 pp
−1.5 pp
−11.8 pp
+0.2 pp
−3.9 pp
−2.8 pp
+17.2 pp
−1.0 pp
+5.7 pp
−0.9 pp
−1.4 pp
−0.7 pp

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. · CLF

−7.8 pp
−24.2 pp
−24.5 pp
−19.0 pp
−5.2 pp
+2.5 pp
+1.3 pp
−0.1 pp
−8.0 pp
−11.5 pp
−8.5 pp
−11.0 pp
−10.2 pp
+1.4 pp
+3.1 pp
+7.4 pp

Friedman Industries, Incorporated · FRD

−13.6 pp
−26.3 pp
+12.1 pp
+11.5 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.8 pp
+4.0 pp
−0.6 pp
−8.7 pp
−1.0 pp
−6.6 pp
−0.7 pp
+6.4 pp
+2.1 pp
+3.6 pp
+1.7 pp

Mesabi Trust · MSB

+14.8 pp
−586.3 pp
0.0 pp
−40.5 pp
−18.3 pp
+572.0 pp
0.0 pp
+0.4 pp
−9.7 pp
+15.6 pp
0.0 pp
+21.0 pp
+1.4 pp
−22.0 pp
0.0 pp
−28.3 pp

Metallus Inc. · MTUS

+7.3 pp
−19.1 pp
−20.5 pp
−7.3 pp
−14.0 pp
+13.3 pp
+2.7 pp
−0.2 pp
−9.4 pp
−13.5 pp
−7.6 pp
−8.0 pp
+2.3 pp
+7.3 pp
−0.8 pp
+2.0 pp

Nucor Corporation · NUE

+6.8 pp
−5.5 pp
−9.5 pp
−8.5 pp
−8.9 pp
−7.5 pp
−16.2 pp
−8.0 pp
−7.2 pp
+5.4 pp
+4.9 pp
+7.9 pp

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · NWPX

+7.5 pp
+3.8 pp
+7.3 pp
−0.2 pp
−1.9 pp
−4.2 pp
−2.5 pp
+2.9 pp
+0.6 pp
+4.3 pp
+1.0 pp
−2.9 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.6 pp
+4.4 pp

Reliance, Inc. · RS

+3.3 pp
−1.3 pp
−1.5 pp
−3.0 pp
−3.6 pp
−2.1 pp
−2.9 pp
−2.2 pp
−3.5 pp
−2.8 pp
−5.2 pp
−2.9 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.9 pp
+0.3 pp
+1.2 pp

Steel Dynamics, Inc. · STLD

+4.6 pp
−4.4 pp
−11.2 pp
−9.7 pp
−5.1 pp
−5.6 pp
−3.5 pp
−1.1 pp
−8.8 pp
−6.9 pp
−6.1 pp
−9.7 pp
−3.7 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.9 pp
+4.0 pp

Ternium S.A. · TX

−8.3 pp
−25.0 pp
−30.2 pp
−14.7 pp
−5.2 pp
−2.6 pp
+10.6 pp
+4.2 pp
−10.7 pp
−6.3 pp
−10.7 pp
−10.7 pp
−3.2 pp
+1.5 pp
+3.1 pp
+4.0 pp

Worthington Steel, Inc. · WS

+3.9 pp
+1.2 pp
+7.0 pp
−2.8 pp
−2.5 pp
+3.7 pp
−5.5 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.3 pp
−0.1 pp
−2.3 pp
−14.2 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Ternium S.A. has the highest Net profit among the 13 Steel companies compared here, at $532 million. Friedman Industries, Incorporated is next at $19 million. Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Ternium S.A. leads with $532 million of TTM profit, 28× the profit of Friedman Industries, Incorporated. Friedman Industries, Incorporated shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (216.7% uncapped) growth from a $19 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderTernium S.A. · $532 million
Gap28× versus #2 · Friedman Industries, Incorporated
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/13 companies · 220 observations

Investor read: Ternium S.A. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Ternium S.A. TX · older report$532M
2Friedman Industries, Incorporated FRD · older report$19M
3Mesabi Trust MSB$12M
5Metallus Inc. MTUS · older report$3M
Profit growthfastest growers
1Friedman Industries, Incorporated FRD · older report100%
2Mesabi Trust MSB-87%
Net profit · company comparison
5/13 level · 3/13 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Nucor Corporation NUE$870M285%Sep 2026
ArcelorMittal S.A. MT$581M-29%Jun 2026
Steel Dynamics, Inc. STLD$400M83%Jun 2026
Ternium S.A. TX$372M162%Mar 2026
Reliance, Inc. RS$266M32%Jun 2026
NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. NWPX$11M175%Jun 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated FRD$9M80%Mar 2026
Metallus Inc. MTUS$5M400%Mar 2026
Mesabi Trust MSB$1M-75%Jun 2026
Luda Technology Group Limited LUD$1M-100%Dec 2025
Worthington Steel, Inc. WS$-68M-215%Jun 2026
Algoma Steel Group Inc. ASTL$-159M-1,950%Jun 2026
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. CLF$-226M-5,322%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Algoma Steel Group Inc. · ASTL

$123M
$244M
$301M
$87M
$-70M
$-20M
$131M
$31M
$-85M
$28M
$6M
$-107M
$-67M
$-25M
$-111M
$-485M
$-365M
$-159M

ArcelorMittal S.A. · MT

$4.1B
$4.2B
$4.0B
$1.1B
$227M
$1.1B
$1.9B
$961M
$-3.0B
$974M
$512M
$299M
$-405M
$822M
$1.8B
$399M
$193M
$581M

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. · CLF

$898M
$813M
$600M
$165M
$-205M
$-43M
$356M
$274M
$-138M
$-53M
$9M
$-232M
$-434M
$-486M
$-470M
$-231M
$-235M
$-226M

Friedman Industries, Incorporated · FRD

$-3M
$-7M
$11M
$2M
$1M
$6M
$8M
$4M
$1M
$5M
$3M
$-1M
$-1M
$5M
$5M
$2M
$3M
$9M

Mesabi Trust · MSB

$16M
$17M
$14M
$-5M
$0M
$-3M
$1M
$9M
$4M
$5M
$3M
$5M
$78M
$6M
$4M
$5M
$3M
$3M
$1M

Metallus Inc. · MTUS

$57M
$37M
$75M
$-13M
$-33M
$14M
$29M
$25M
$1M
$24M
$5M
$-6M
$-21M
$1M
$4M
$8M
$-14M
$5M

Nucor Corporation · NUE

$2.2B
$2.2B
$2.7B
$1.8B
$1.2B
$1.6B
$873M
$959M
$712M
$303M
$345M
$226M
$706M
$683M
$870M

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · NWPX

$2M
$4M
$10M
$10M
$8M
$2M
$7M
$6M
$5M
$5M
$9M
$10M
$10M
$4M
$9M
$14M
$9M
$11M

Reliance, Inc. · RS

$422M
$525M
$574M
$394M
$351M
$384M
$386M
$296M
$273M
$304M
$268M
$200M
$106M
$201M
$234M
$190M
$117M
$266M

Steel Dynamics, Inc. · STLD

$1.1B
$1.1B
$1.2B
$918M
$639M
$644M
$816M
$580M
$427M
$588M
$432M
$321M
$210M
$218M
$301M
$404M
$265M
$400M

Ternium S.A. · TX

$1.1B
$878M
$936M
$220M
$59M
$480M
$736M
$-783M
$554M
$491M
$-743M
$93M
$333M
$142M
$259M
$-270M
$171M
$372M

Worthington Steel, Inc. · WS

$31M
$-13M
$9M
$72M
$62M
$-2M
$52M
$58M
$32M
$16M
$12M
$59M
$39M
$22M
$11M
$-68M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Algoma Steel Group Inc. · ASTL

48%
-70%
-157%
-108%
-56%
-64%
-95%
-445%
-189%
-1,950%

ArcelorMittal S.A. · MT

-95%
-73%
-52%
-8.9%
-1,415%
-15%
-73%
-69%
-16%
257%
33%
-29%

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. · CLF

-24%
-87%
-123%
-105%
-41%
66%
-97%
-185%
-5,322%

Friedman Industries, Incorporated · FRD

0.0%
-85%
-27%
100%
0.0%
-17%
-63%
-125%
-200%
0.0%
67%
80%

Mesabi Trust · MSB

-119%
-100%
-118%
-93%
200%
-44%
1,850%
20%
33%
0.0%
-96%
-50%
-75%

Metallus Inc. · MTUS

39%
-126%
-158%
-62%
-61%
71%
-83%
-124%
-2,200%
-96%
-20%
400%

Nucor Corporation · NUE

74%
-19%
-45%
-42%
-51%
-42%
-81%
-60%
-68%
133%
98%
285%

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · NWPX

400%
100%
300%
-50%
-30%
-40%
-38%
150%
29%
67%
100%
-20%
0.0%
40%
-10%
175%

Reliance, Inc. · RS

74%
-0.8%
-17%
-27%
-33%
-25%
-22%
-21%
-31%
-32%
-61%
-34%
-13%
-5.0%
10%
32%

Steel Dynamics, Inc. · STLD

71%
-8.2%
-42%
-42%
-33%
-37%
-33%
-8.7%
-47%
-45%
-51%
-63%
-30%
26%
26%
83%

Ternium S.A. · TX

-19%
-84%
-95%
-45%
-21%
-456%
839%
2.3%
-201%
-40%
-71%
-390%
-49%
162%

Worthington Steel, Inc. · WS

100%
478%
-19%
-48%
-77%
1.7%
22%
38%
-8.3%
-215%
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

ArcelorMittal S.A. has the highest ROCE among the 13 Steel companies compared here, at 21%. Mesabi Trust is next at 5.7%. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +3 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: ArcelorMittal S.A. leads ROCE at 21%, 15.3 percentage points above Mesabi Trust. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +3 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderArcelorMittal S.A. · 21%
Gap268.4% versus #2 · Mesabi Trust
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/13 companies · 233 observations

Investor read: ArcelorMittal S.A. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
2Mesabi Trust MSB5.7%
3Friedman Industries, Incorporated FRD · older report5.3%
ROCE changefastest improvers
2Nucor Corporation NUE+2.2 pp
3Friedman Industries, Incorporated FRD · older report+2.1 pp
5Luda Technology Group Limited LUD · older report+1.7 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
13/13 level · 13/13 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
ArcelorMittal S.A. MT21%−1.2 ppJun 2026
Mesabi Trust MSB5.7%−12.3 ppJun 2026
Nucor Corporation NUE5.3%+2.2 ppSep 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated FRD5.3%+2.1 ppMar 2026
Steel Dynamics, Inc. STLD4.9%+2.0 ppJun 2026
Reliance, Inc. RS4.6%+1.3 ppJun 2026
NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. NWPX4.0%+1.5 ppJun 2026
Ternium S.A. TX1.4%+0.8 ppMar 2026
Metallus Inc. MTUS0.9%+0.7 ppMar 2026
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. CLF-0.3%+3.0 ppJun 2026
Luda Technology Group Limited LUD-0.3%+1.7 ppDec 2025
Worthington Steel, Inc. WS-5.3%−10.5 ppJun 2026
Algoma Steel Group Inc. ASTL-6.5%−3.2 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Algoma Steel Group Inc. · ASTL

33%
19%
17%
0.3%
-3.6%
1.0%
7.8%
1.6%
-1.7%
0.1%
-0.5%
-3.4%
-5.1%
-5.7%
-3.3%
-29%
-21%
-7.2%
-6.5%

ArcelorMittal S.A. · MT

7.0%
6.8%
6.7%
2.5%
-0.4%
1.7%
2.6%
1.7%
-2.7%
1.5%
1.4%
0.9%
0.8%
1.2%
22%
0.7%
0.5%
20%
21%

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. · CLF

7.6%
7.2%
5.5%
1.2%
-1.2%
-0.2%
3.1%
2.1%
-0.8%
-0.3%
0.0%
-1.8%
-2.9%
-3.5%
-3.3%
-1.3%
-1.9%
-1.2%
-0.3%

Friedman Industries, Incorporated · FRD

-6.3%
-5.2%
8.7%
0.1%
1.1%
5.7%
5.5%
0.6%
3.7%
4.2%
-0.8%
-0.1%
-0.7%
3.2%
3.9%
1.4%
1.9%
5.3%

Mesabi Trust · MSB

66%
76%
62%
-18%
-1.6%
-10%
4.7%
50%
23%
38%
21%
25%
135%
31%
18%
21%
4.8%
16%
5.7%

Metallus Inc. · MTUS

7.2%
6.4%
12%
-1.4%
-0.6%
3.0%
4.1%
3.5%
0.2%
3.0%
0.4%
-1.0%
-1.9%
0.2%
1.2%
1.1%
-2.6%
0.9%

Nucor Corporation · NUE

15%
14%
16%
9.9%
6.2%
7.4%
3.5%
4.0%
3.0%
1.3%
1.3%
1.0%
3.1%
3.0%
3.6%
5.3%

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · NWPX

0.8%
1.3%
3.4%
3.5%
2.2%
1.0%
2.3%
1.8%
1.7%
1.7%
2.6%
3.0%
2.1%
1.1%
2.5%
3.6%
2.5%
2.4%
4.0%

Reliance, Inc. · RS

7.0%
8.6%
9.4%
6.5%
5.2%
5.7%
5.6%
4.2%
3.5%
4.1%
3.7%
2.9%
1.5%
2.9%
3.3%
2.8%
1.8%
3.9%
4.6%

Steel Dynamics, Inc. · STLD

16%
15%
16%
11%
6.8%
7.2%
8.8%
5.9%
4.2%
6.0%
4.4%
3.0%
1.9%
2.1%
2.9%
3.8%
2.3%
3.8%
4.9%

Ternium S.A. · TX

11%
8.0%
7.9%
3.7%
0.3%
2.3%
4.7%
3.0%
3.3%
3.7%
2.1%
0.9%
0.2%
0.6%
1.0%
1.1%
0.8%
1.4%

Worthington Steel, Inc. · WS

0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
6.6%
-1.4%
5.3%
5.3%
6.8%
1.5%
1.5%
5.2%
3.4%
1.5%
0.2%
-5.3%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Algoma Steel Group Inc. · ASTL

−36.7 pp
−17.5 pp
−9.5 pp
+1.3 pp
+1.9 pp
−0.9 pp
−8.3 pp
−5.0 pp
−3.4 pp
−5.8 pp
−2.8 pp
−25.3 pp
−15.7 pp
−1.5 pp
−3.2 pp

ArcelorMittal S.A. · MT

−7.4 pp
−5.1 pp
−4.1 pp
−0.8 pp
−2.3 pp
−0.2 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.8 pp
+3.5 pp
−0.3 pp
+20.8 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.3 pp
+19.0 pp
−1.2 pp

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. · CLF

−8.8 pp
−7.4 pp
−2.4 pp
+0.9 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
−3.1 pp
−3.9 pp
−2.1 pp
−3.2 pp
−3.3 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.0 pp
+2.3 pp
+3.0 pp

Friedman Industries, Incorporated · FRD

+7.4 pp
+10.9 pp
−3.2 pp
+0.5 pp
+2.6 pp
−1.5 pp
−6.3 pp
−0.7 pp
−4.4 pp
−1.0 pp
+4.7 pp
+1.5 pp
+2.6 pp
+2.1 pp

Mesabi Trust · MSB

−67.1 pp
−86.3 pp
−56.9 pp
+68.4 pp
+24.6 pp
+48.7 pp
+16.3 pp
−25.6 pp
+111.5 pp
−7.5 pp
−3.0 pp
−3.6 pp
−129.7 pp
−14.5 pp
−12.3 pp

Metallus Inc. · MTUS

−7.8 pp
−3.4 pp
−7.4 pp
+4.9 pp
+0.8 pp
0.0 pp
−3.7 pp
−4.5 pp
−2.1 pp
−2.8 pp
+0.8 pp
+2.1 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.7 pp

Nucor Corporation · NUE

−5.5 pp
−7.9 pp
−8.2 pp
−6.4 pp
−3.2 pp
−6.1 pp
−2.2 pp
−2.0 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.7 pp
+2.6 pp
+2.2 pp

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · NWPX

+1.4 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.1 pp
−1.7 pp
−0.5 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.3 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.3 pp
+1.5 pp

Reliance, Inc. · RS

−1.8 pp
−2.9 pp
−3.8 pp
−2.3 pp
−1.7 pp
−1.6 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.3 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.2 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.3 pp

Steel Dynamics, Inc. · STLD

−8.8 pp
−8.2 pp
−7.1 pp
−5.5 pp
−2.6 pp
−1.2 pp
−4.4 pp
−2.9 pp
−2.3 pp
−3.9 pp
−1.5 pp
+0.8 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.7 pp
+2.0 pp

Ternium S.A. · TX

−10.6 pp
−5.7 pp
−3.2 pp
−0.7 pp
+3.0 pp
+1.4 pp
−2.6 pp
−2.1 pp
−3.1 pp
−3.1 pp
−1.1 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.8 pp

Worthington Steel, Inc. · WS

+0.7 pp
+6.6 pp
+4.6 pp
−1.3 pp
+2.9 pp
−3.8 pp
−0.1 pp
−3.4 pp
0.0 pp
−1.3 pp
−10.5 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the lowest PEG among the 13 Steel companies compared here, at 0.32×. Metallus Inc. is next at 0.45×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 6.42×. 3 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.32×, 28.9% below Metallus Inc.. Only 3 of 13 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderFriedman Industries, Incorporated · 0.32×
Gap28.9% versus #2 · Metallus Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/13 companies · 17 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
1Friedman Industries, Incorporated FRD · older report0.3
2Metallus Inc. MTUS · older report0.5
P/Elowest P/E
1Friedman Industries, Incorporated FRD · older report6.4
2Ternium S.A. TX · older report13.8
Valuation · company comparison
3/13 level · 13/13 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Reliance, Inc. RS2.021.7Jun 2026
Worthington Steel, Inc. WS1.5248.2Jun 2026
Steel Dynamics, Inc. STLD0.820.8Jun 2026
NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. NWPX0.630.1Jun 2026
Metallus Inc. MTUS0.5233.4Mar 2026
Friedman Industries, Incorporated FRD0.36.4Mar 2026
Nucor Corporation NUE17.6Sep 2026
ArcelorMittal S.A. MT25.5Jun 2026
Ternium S.A. TX13.8Mar 2026
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. CLF219.9Jun 2026
Algoma Steel Group Inc. ASTL16.4Jun 2026
Mesabi Trust MSB32.2Jun 2026
Luda Technology Group Limited LUD214.0Dec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Friedman Industries, Incorporated · FRD

0.1
0.2
0.3

Metallus Inc. · MTUS

0.5

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · NWPX

0.3
0.6
0.3
0.4
0.6
3.1
0.6

Reliance, Inc. · RS

1.4
2.0

Steel Dynamics, Inc. · STLD

0.8

Worthington Steel, Inc. · WS

2.6
1.3
1.5

P/E · reported quarter history

Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.

Algoma Steel Group Inc. · ASTL

1.5
1.8
1.5
2.1
3.2
6.4
24.8
35.5
110.9
16.4

ArcelorMittal S.A. · MT

2.4
2.0
1.4
1.5
2.6
4.4
5.6
5.1
26.1
31.0
13.7
18.9
9.8
10.8
11.1
13.6
25.5

Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. · CLF

4.1
4.7
2.3
2.9
6.3
20.4
38.1
23.3
27.2
30.7
219.9

Friedman Industries, Incorporated · FRD

2.0
4.3
4.3
21.6
10.1
3.9
5.2
5.2
6.1
7.8
8.8
14.1
18.9
17.1
13.8
13.5
9.2
6.4

Mesabi Trust · MSB

4.7
5.3
4.2
8.5
11.4
56.9
38.0
23.8
13.5
9.8
13.1
3.4
3.3
3.9
4.1
26.0
31.1
32.2

Metallus Inc. · MTUS

5.2
5.9
4.5
5.2
14.0
27.0
31.9
16.0
13.2
17.5
28.5
471.0
233.4

Nucor Corporation · NUE

5.8
5.3
3.2
3.4
6.1
7.6
9.7
11.6
11.4
14.5
13.8
18.4
24.9
19.4
17.1
17.6

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. · NWPX

27.4
19.6
14.5
11.0
10.8
10.5
11.0
12.9
14.5
14.6
13.6
15.4
14.2
12.6
12.4
14.4
17.6
18.2
30.1

Reliance, Inc. · RS

7.4
7.0
5.6
5.7
6.8
9.2
10.8
11.0
12.4
15.6
14.6
15.9
17.3
20.7
22.9
20.5
20.7
19.8
21.7

Steel Dynamics, Inc. · STLD

4.0
4.3
2.9
3.1
4.7
6.0
6.4
6.9
8.1
10.2
10.4
11.4
11.6
16.5
18.7
18.5
21.2
19.3
20.8

Ternium S.A. · TX

2.2
2.2
1.9
2.0
3.4
5.9
6.5
26.6
12.5
12.6
90.0
9.9
11.9
17.4
13.8

Worthington Steel, Inc. · WS

10.8
9.3
10.6
14.3
15.7
12.5
11.4
14.2
13.7
17.3
248.2
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Steel comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 4 of the 13 companies report on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so their ranks are marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 4 companies have older fundamental reporting dates than the sector’s freshest reporters; their ranks carry a stale marker.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 13 Steel companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Sep 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Steel company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Steel comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 13 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Steel sector outperforming S&P 500?

Steel has outperformed S&P 500 by 30.6% over 52 weeks and 1.5% over 13 weeks. 8 of 13 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 7 of 13 beat the sector itself.

Which Steel company is largest by revenue?

Ternium S.A. leads with revenue of $15,611 million, based on 5 of 13 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Steel company is growing fastest?

Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the fastest current revenue growth at 45.4%, across 5 of 13 comparable companies.

Which Steel company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Friedman Industries, Incorporated ranks first at 68.2/100 with 59.9% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Steel company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.32, among 3 of 13 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Steel comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Sep 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Steel company is the biggest?

Ternium S.A. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $15,611 million, ahead of Worthington Steel, Inc. at $3,444 million. That covers 5 of 13 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Steel company has the best profit margins?

Mesabi Trust has the highest operating margin at 48.4%, from 12 of 13 comparable companies. Nucor Corporation shows the biggest recent improvement, at +7.9 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Steel company makes the most profit?

Ternium S.A. earns the most, at $532 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 5 of 13 comparable companies. Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Steel company earns the highest return on capital?

ArcelorMittal S.A. leads on return on capital employed at 21%, across 13 of 13 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Steel stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Friedman Industries, Incorporated screens cheapest at 0.32×. Only 3 of 13 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Steel sector beating the market?

Steel has outperformed S&P 500 by 30.6% over the last 52 weeks and 1.5% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 8 of 13 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Steel stock has the strongest price momentum?

Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Steel company scores highest for research priority?

Friedman Industries, Incorporated scores 68.2 out of 100 with 59.9% evidence confidence, from 23.3 points on growth and earnings, 11.9 on capital efficiency, 16.5 on valuation and 16.5 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Steel companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 13 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Sep 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Steel sector?

The 13 Steel companies on this page carry $199,597 million of combined market value. Nucor Corporation is the largest at $62,410 million, about 31% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.

What is the Steel sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 13 Steel companies on this page is 25.5×, measured on the 13 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.

How is the Steel sector performing?

8 of the 13 covered Steel companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 30.6% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.

How many Steel stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 13 listed Steel companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Sep 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI