Steel: Ternium S.A. owns the largest revenue base; Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the fastest current growth.
01 · the industry itself · before any single company
How has Steel moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 9% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 14% on average over the last four reported quarters.
BASING · +3 joined~Moving with the index8 of 16 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months
Steel, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Steel, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Steel, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 16 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is Steel outperforming S&P 500?
Steel has outperformed S&P 500 by 30.6% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 1.5%. 8 of 13 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. is the strongest against the sector itself at +32.3%.
-1.5%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+30.6%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
8/13Stocks leading S&P 500
7/13Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Steel has outperformed S&P 500 by 30.6% over 52 weeks and 1.5% over 13 weeks. 8 of 13 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 7 of 13 beat the sector itself. Ternium S.A. leads with revenue of $15,611 million, based on 5 of 13 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Companies
13
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$199.6B
Nucor Corporation
Revenue growing
3/5
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
8/13
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 13
03 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 59.9% evidence confidence.
ArcelorMittal S.A. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Exact sum: 18 + 8.5 + 13.7 + 9.8 = 50 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
Exact sum: 4.5 + 15.9 + 9.5 + 3.8 = 33.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
Exact sum: 8.3 + 5.7 + 9.6 + 5.3 = 28.9 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
Exact sum: 11.8 + 3.2 + 11 + 4.5 = 30.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
Showing 10 of 13 companies
04 · what price has already done
Market action
NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. has the strongest one-year price move in Steel at +162.2%. Friedman Industries, Incorporated leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +41.8%. 8 of 13 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Steel itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
05 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Ternium S.A. has the highest Revenue among the 13 Steel companies compared here, at $15,611 million. Worthington Steel, Inc. is next at $3,444 million. Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the highest Revenue growth at 45.4%, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Ternium S.A. is the scale leader at $15,611 million, 353.3% ahead of Worthington Steel, Inc.. Friedman Industries, Incorporated's growth is 45.4% from a $647 million base, with 18 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderTernium S.A. · $15,611 million
Gap353.3% versus #2 · Worthington Steel, Inc.
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/13 companies · 220 observations
Investor read: Ternium S.A. is the scale benchmark; Friedman Industries, Incorporated is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Ternium S.A.'s growth falls below Friedman Industries, Incorporated's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Mesabi Trust has the highest OPM among the 13 Steel companies compared here, at 48.4%. Nucor Corporation is next at 11.7%. Nucor Corporation has the highest Margin change at +7.9 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 12 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Mesabi Trust leads opm at 48.4%; Nucor Corporation leads margin change at +7.9 percentage points.
LeaderMesabi Trust · 48.4%
Gap313.7% versus #2 · Nucor Corporation
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage12/13 companies · 212 observations
Investor read: Mesabi Trust sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Ternium S.A. has the highest Net profit among the 13 Steel companies compared here, at $532 million. Friedman Industries, Incorporated is next at $19 million. Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Ternium S.A. leads with $532 million of TTM profit, 28× the profit of Friedman Industries, Incorporated. Friedman Industries, Incorporated shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (216.7% uncapped) growth from a $19 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderTernium S.A. · $532 million
Gap28× versus #2 · Friedman Industries, Incorporated
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/13 companies · 220 observations
Investor read: Ternium S.A. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
ArcelorMittal S.A. has the highest ROCE among the 13 Steel companies compared here, at 21%. Mesabi Trust is next at 5.7%. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +3 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: ArcelorMittal S.A. leads ROCE at 21%, 15.3 percentage points above Mesabi Trust. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +3 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderArcelorMittal S.A. · 21%
Gap268.4% versus #2 · Mesabi Trust
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/13 companies · 233 observations
Investor read: ArcelorMittal S.A. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the lowest PEG among the 13 Steel companies compared here, at 0.32×. Metallus Inc. is next at 0.45×. The same company also holds the lowest P/E, at 6.42×. 3 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.32×, 28.9% below Metallus Inc.. Only 3 of 13 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderFriedman Industries, Incorporated · 0.32×
Gap28.9% versus #2 · Metallus Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/13 companies · 17 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
Showing the 12 largest of 13 companies with a series here. The remaining 1 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
This Steel comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 4 of the 13 companies report on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so their ranks are marked stale. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
4 companies have older fundamental reporting dates than the sector’s freshest reporters; their ranks carry a stale marker.
11 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 13 Steel companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Sep 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
Steel company comparison FAQs
These 22 answers restate the Steel comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 13 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Steel sector outperforming S&P 500?
Steel has outperformed S&P 500 by 30.6% over 52 weeks and 1.5% over 13 weeks. 8 of 13 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 7 of 13 beat the sector itself.
Which Steel company is largest by revenue?
Ternium S.A. leads with revenue of $15,611 million, based on 5 of 13 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Steel company is growing fastest?
Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the fastest current revenue growth at 45.4%, across 5 of 13 comparable companies.
Which Steel company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Friedman Industries, Incorporated ranks first at 68.2/100 with 59.9% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Steel company has the lowest comparable PEG?
Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.32, among 3 of 13 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.
How much history does this Steel comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Sep 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Steel company is the biggest?
Ternium S.A. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $15,611 million, ahead of Worthington Steel, Inc. at $3,444 million. That covers 5 of 13 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Steel company has the best profit margins?
Mesabi Trust has the highest operating margin at 48.4%, from 12 of 13 comparable companies. Nucor Corporation shows the biggest recent improvement, at +7.9 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Steel company makes the most profit?
Ternium S.A. earns the most, at $532 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 5 of 13 comparable companies. Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Steel company earns the highest return on capital?
ArcelorMittal S.A. leads on return on capital employed at 21%, across 13 of 13 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Steel stock is the cheapest?
On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Friedman Industries, Incorporated screens cheapest at 0.32×. Only 3 of 13 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Steel sector beating the market?
Steel has outperformed S&P 500 by 30.6% over the last 52 weeks and 1.5% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 8 of 13 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Steel stock has the strongest price momentum?
Friedman Industries, Incorporated has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Steel company scores highest for research priority?
Friedman Industries, Incorporated scores 68.2 out of 100 with 59.9% evidence confidence, from 23.3 points on growth and earnings, 11.9 on capital efficiency, 16.5 on valuation and 16.5 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Steel companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 13 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Sep 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Steel sector?
The 13 Steel companies on this page carry $199,597 million of combined market value. Nucor Corporation is the largest at $62,410 million, about 31% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.
What is the Steel sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 13 Steel companies on this page is 25.5×, measured on the 13 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.
How is the Steel sector performing?
8 of the 13 covered Steel companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 30.6% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.
How many Steel stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 13 listed Steel companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Sep 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.