Priority Technology Holdings share price today

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s share price was $7.92 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been stalling near its high for 9 weeks. That is 29.4% above its average price over the last 200 trading days.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is in stage 3. The phase helps read everything below.

In the last 52 weeks it traded between $5 and $8, and at that close it was at the high of that range. Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the S&P 500, and it has stayed ahead for 7 weeks in a row.

Over the last 8.3 years the share price moved −29% while the S&P 500 moved +170%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. pays no dividend. In the last 12 reported quarters it declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to show. Companies like this usually keep their earnings in the business, so the cash-flow sections show where that cash goes.

Priority Technology Holdings is on one of our US lists: US tech stocks.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. earned $9.9 M of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, −9.3% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY25 profit was $55.7 M. That is 3.8% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $10.9 M. 5 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

Why profit moved: revenue changed +9.4% on a year earlier and the margin moved −2.5 percentage points. Sales did the work while the margin got thinner.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +137.2% and revenue +8.9%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra dollar of revenue adds more to profit.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. reported $262 M of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +9.4% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 12th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 4 years it has grown 16.6% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at $953 M.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to $1.0 B.

FY25 revenue was $953 M, +8.3% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +8.9% on average, against 16.6% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +8.9%, against +10.9% a year over the last 8 quarters (stabilising).

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s operating margin was 13.2% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 2.5 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between 6.4% and 15.5%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every $100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −2.5 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed −0.4 points. So the drop came mostly from costs below the gross margin, such as staff and overheads, measured against sales.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s cash-flow history is too short to judge how much of its profit turns into cash. In FY25 it brought in $100 M of operating cash against $55.7 M of profit. After $24.9 M of spending on assets, $75.1 M was left over as free cash.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $67.9 M on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 2.4% of FY25 revenue a year.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn.

Spending on assets: $67.9 M over the last 3 years.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s P/E is 11.9×, near the high end of its own history: higher than 75% of past readings. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 9.9×, over 1 year of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many dollars the market pays for each dollar of yearly profit.

In short: the multiple is high against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 12 quarters of 1 measure, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

The return-on-capital line is not shown: net worth is negative, so a return on capital means nothing. The balance sheet is in distress, and this reading uses the growth lines alone.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the stock price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. earned a ROE of −60% in FY25. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 4.8 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 5.8% net margin and 0.40× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on equity (ROE) is the profit the business earns on its shareholders’ money. We do not have the full capital split, so ROE is the longest history we can draw here.

Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 5.8% net margin × 0.40× asset turnover × −25.97× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ −60.3% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 14.2% − 9.4% = +4.8 percentage points. The 9.4% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Positive but thin: it creates value with little room for error.

The 14.2% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY25 at 16.4%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s net worth is negative: it owes more than it owns, so a debt-to-equity ratio means nothing here. Year by year, that ratio went from 4.23 in FY21 to −11.33 in FY25. So the returns on this page come from the business, not from borrowed money.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Lower is safer, and the direction matters as much as the level.

11.0% of Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s tradable shares are in short positions, which are bets that the price will fall, so a large group of traders is betting against it. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 1.5 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead.

There is no quarter-by-quarter list of owners here, so we look at short interest: the share of tradable shares held in short positions, which gain if the price falls.

It is a single reading at one point in time; we do not have its history.

Why it is at this level: the figure does not say who has the short positions or why, so we show the level without guessing the story.

For Priority Technology Holdings, Inc., the Z-score is 0.74. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is in the danger zone. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

Why it matters: a Z-score of 0.74 is inside the danger zone, so the balance sheet is a real risk.

There is no score against its industry: Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison for Software - Infrastructure.

The score ranks a company within its industry: each measure is scored against the other members. Without that group there is no score, so none is shown.

No sector comparison is shown here, not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison.

Priority Technology Holdings is the 90th largest of 117 Software - Infrastructure companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 4 November 2026). Just above it: Horizon Quantum Holdings, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. and Aeva Technologies, Inc. Just below it: Cognyte Software, Rezolve AI PLC and Backblaze, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure companies close in size

87. Horizon Quantum Holdings Ltd. $695 million
88. Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. $681 million
89. Aeva Technologies, Inc. $662 million
90. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. $653 million
91. Cognyte Software Ltd. $653 million
92. Rezolve AI PLC $571 million
93. Backblaze, Inc. $531 million

All 117 Software - Infrastructure companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

2719. ARKO Petroleum Corp. $654 million · Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
2720. Hello Group Inc. $654 million · Internet Content & Information
2721. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. $653 million
2722. Cognyte Software Ltd. $653 million · Software - Infrastructure
2723. Unusual Machines, Inc. $651 million · Computer Hardware

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.