Noah Holdings Limited share price today

Noah Holdings Limited's share price was $7.05 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been falling for 21 weeks. That is 27.2% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $7 and $12, and at that close it sat 6% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Noah Holdings Limited is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the S&P 500, and it has been behind for 32 weeks running.

Over the last 10 years the share price moved −72% while the S&P 500 moved +261%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 27 March 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Noah Holdings Limited declared ₹4.67 per local share for Dec 2025. It reports in its home currency, and one US-listed share can stand for several local shares, so we do not set this against the dollar price or show a yield.

Noah Holdings Limited is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list.

Noah Holdings Limited earned ₹0.2 B of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +30.0% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹0.6 B. Over 4 years profit has grown −19.2% a year on average. That is 37.5% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹0.2 B.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY25 profit was ₹0.6 B (+17.5% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed −1.5% on a year earlier and the margin moved +9.1 percentage points. Most of the change came from keeping more of each sale.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −3.0% and revenue +1.3%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

Noah Holdings Limited reported ₹0.6 B of income in the Jun 2026 quarter, −1.5% on the same quarter a year earlier. Over 4 years it has grown −11.7% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹2.6 B. The last four reported quarters add to ₹2.6 B.

For a bank, revenue is everything it earns: interest on its loans plus fees from its businesses.

FY25 revenue was ₹2.6 B, +0.4% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +1.3% on average, against −11.7% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +1.2%, against −3.7% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating); profit over the last 12 months grew +2.9%, against −7.1% a year (accelerating).

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

Noah Holdings Limited's net margin was 37.5% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 9.1 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between 18.3% and 31.5%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period.

Net margin is what the bank keeps from every $100 of revenue after every cost, provision for bad loans and tax. With big fee businesses in the mix, it is the clearest margin we can read for this bank.

Why: the net margin move is clear, but the cost details behind it are not in our data, so we show the move without guessing the reason.

Noah Holdings Limited does not report loan-quality figures this page can read, so this section says so rather than guess. No bad-loan figures are filed in a form this page can read, and none are guessed from the profit line. The income, margin and return sections carry what this business does report.

Gross NPA is the share of the loan book where repayments have stopped. Net NPA is what is left after the money the lender has already set aside for those loans. Falling is good; rising is a warning.

Why: loan quality drives a lender, but its details (new bad loans, recoveries, money set aside) are not in our data for this company. The sections around this one carry what we can back up.

Noah Holdings Limited's revenue was ₹2.6 B in FY25, +0.4% on the year before, so the loan book is growing. The latest quarter was −1.5% on a year earlier. The net margin on that income is 37.5%, +9.1 percentage points on a year ago.

We read the loan book through revenue: when the book and the businesses grow, revenue grows with them. It is only a rough guide, because interest-rate changes and fee swings can move it a few points in any year.

Interest income stands in for the size of the loan book; changes in interest rates can move it a few points in any year.

In short: a lender grows well when its loan book grows, its margin stays steady and its loans stay clean. Quarterly loan-quality figures are missing here, so revenue growth and margin are the two we watch.

This company reports in its home currency, not US dollars, so the money charts are left out here. The figures in the text are in that currency (₹); nothing is converted.

Noah Holdings Limited's P/BV is 0.3×, with too little history to compare. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

For a bank or lender we compare the price with book value, the net worth on its balance sheet. P/BV is how many rupees the market pays for each $1 of that net worth. Below 1× means the market values it at less than its net worth.

Why the multiple is low: this lender earns about 6% a year on its equity. A lender that earns less on its net worth is valued lower for each rupee of it, and that gap usually closes only if returns improve.

In short: there is too little history to say whether the multiple is high or low for this company, so the book value trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Noah Holdings Limited's business is turning around. Profit growth has swung from −45.0% at its low to +2.9%, rising from a low 5 quarters ago, with ROE steady at 6.2%. This is based on 12 quarters of 3 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: a turn in growth is often where a bigger change starts. The lines say a turn is forming, so the question is whether the next quarters confirm it.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the stock price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Noah Holdings Limited earned a return on equity of 6% in FY25. Its lowest yearly reading on file was 5% in FY24. On its assets, every ₹100 earned about ₹4.71, before the effect of borrowing. For a lender the balance sheet is the business, so the return on equity and on assets have to be read together.

Two numbers rate a bank: ROE, what it earns on shareholders’ money, and ROA, what it earns on all its assets. An ROE above about 13 to 15% is healthy; below that, net worth grows slowly.

That return is below the level a bank needs to grow its net worth quickly, which helps explain why its multiple is where it is.

Why: the ROE chart shows the move, but the deposit-cost and bad-loan details behind it are not in our data.

For a bank, borrowing is the raw material of the business, not a warning sign: it borrows money in order to lend it out. Its safety is read through its returns and its loans. Its safety is read from the bad-loan figures and the return on equity instead.

For a manufacturer, debt is a claim on its profits. For a lender it is the stock it trades in, so the usual debt-to-equity test would mislead and is not used here.

We have no ownership or short-position figures for Noah Holdings Limited, so this section says so rather than fill the gap. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 2.5 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead.

There is no quarter-by-quarter list of owners here, so we look at short interest: the share of tradable shares held in short positions, which gain if the price falls.

For Noah Holdings Limited, the Z-score is not used, because it was built for manufacturers, not lenders. For a lender, safety is read from its capital and bad-loan figures instead.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

There is no score against its industry: Noah Holdings Limited is not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison for Asset Management.

The score ranks a company within its industry: each measure is scored against the other members. Without that group there is no score, so none is shown.

No sector comparison is shown here, not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison.

Noah Holdings Limited is the 73rd largest of 90 Asset Management companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 4 November 2026). Just above it: OIO Group, Vinci Compass Investments and MSC Income Fund, Inc. Just below it: Gladstone Capital Corporation, AlTi Global, Inc. and BlackRock TCP Capital Corp.

Asset Management companies close in size

70. OIO Group $606 million
71. Vinci Compass Investments Ltd. $576 million
72. MSC Income Fund, Inc. $560 million
73. Noah Holdings Limited $485 million
74. Gladstone Capital Corporation $445 million
75. AlTi Global, Inc. $404 million
76. BlackRock TCP Capital Corp. $367 million

All 90 Asset Management companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

2893. The Honest Company, Inc. $467 million · Household & Personal Products
2894. Bank of Marin Bancorp $466 million · Banks - Regional
2895. Noah Holdings Limited $465 million
2896. Wabash National Corporation $465 million · Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
2897. Arvinas, Inc. $464 million · Biotechnology

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 4 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.