Oil & Gas Drilling Stocks
Oil & Gas Drilling: Transocean Ltd. owns the largest revenue base; Helmerich & Payne, Inc. has the fastest current growth.
How has Oil & Gas Drilling moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 17% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 74% on average over the last four reported quarters.
RS — · 6/10 >200d (−1) · 0/10 lead (+0) · EPS 4/10↑
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 10 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Is Oil & Gas Drilling outperforming S&P 500?
Oil & Gas Drilling has outperformed S&P 500 by 28.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 25%. 3 of 10 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is broad. Nabors Industries Ltd. is the strongest against the sector itself at +18.9%.
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Oil & Gas Drilling has outperformed S&P 500 by 28.7% over 52 weeks and 25% over 13 weeks. 3 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 7 of 10 beat the sector itself. Transocean Ltd. leads with revenue of $4,140 million, based on 5 of 10 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Nabors Industries Ltd.NBR | 59.1/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 7 pp 45% evidence | 11.5/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 7.9% 76% evidence | 11.5/20 P/E 6.3× · PEG — 15% evidence | 17.0/20 RS sector 18.9% · RS bench 12% · 1Y 135.6%4 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.1 + 11.5 + 11.5 + 17 = 59.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 2Transocean Ltd.RIG | 53.9/100Mixed-positive evidence61% evidence | ASLEEP | 23.2/35 Revenue 12.9% · PAT — · OPM change 19.4 pp 62% evidence | 13.9/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 26.5% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence | 6.8/20 RS sector 0.3% · RS bench -4.8% · 1Y 68.4%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 23.2 + 13.9 + 10 + 6.8 = 53.9 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is 0.3% and the one-year return is 68.4%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth. | ||||||
| 3Seadrill LimitedSDRL | 53.4/100Mixed-positive evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 19.5/35 Revenue 7.9% · PAT -118.8% · OPM change 1.3 pp 62% evidence | 11.1/25 ROCE 0.7% · OPM 6.7% 76% evidence | 8.9/20 P/E 65.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.9/20 RS sector 2.7% · RS bench -0.7% · 1Y 45.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 19.5 + 11.1 + 8.9 + 13.9 = 53.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 4Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.PTEN | 53.2/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 17.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -2.6 pp 45% evidence | 6.0/25 ROCE -0.1% · OPM -1.3% 76% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 33.4× · PEG — 15% evidence | 19.0/20 RS sector 17% · RS bench 10.7% · 1Y 85.8%3 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 17.8 + 6 + 10.4 + 19 = 53.2 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 5Noble Corporation plcNE | 51.6/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 18.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 7.3 pp 45% evidence | 12.8/25 ROCE 0.4% · OPM 28.7% 76% evidence | 9.6/20 P/E 40.1× · PEG — 15% evidence | 10.5/20 RS sector 1.5% · RS bench -3% · 1Y 52.5%1 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 18.7 + 12.8 + 9.6 + 10.5 = 51.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 6Helmerich & Payne, Inc.HP | 44.3/100Mixed-negative evidence71% evidence | ASLEEP | 13.1/35 Revenue 29.7% · PAT -266.2% · OPM change -8.1 pp 83% evidence | 5.5/25 ROCE -0.6% · OPM -4% 76% evidence | 10.8/20 P/E 11.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 14.9/20 RS sector 4% · RS bench 0.4% · 1Y 99.5%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 13.1 + 5.5 + 10.8 + 14.9 = 44.3 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 0.4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 7Valaris LimitedVAL | 43.2/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence | ASLEEP | 9.1/35 Revenue -10% · PAT 100% · OPM change -18.7 pp 62% evidence | 9.8/25 ROCE 0.5% · OPM 4.3% 76% evidence | 11.1/20 P/E 6.9× · PEG — 15% evidence | 13.2/20 RS sector 4.5% · RS bench -1.2% · 1Y 66%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 9.1 + 9.8 + 11.1 + 13.2 = 43.2 · Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is -1.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation. | ||||||
| 8Precision Drilling CorporationPDS | 40.1/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence | ASLEEP | 15.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -5.1 pp 45% evidence | 11.0/25 ROCE 0.6% · OPM 7.5% 76% evidence | 8.5/20 P/E 703.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 5.0/20 RS sector -6.4% · RS bench -9.9% · 1Y 38.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 15.6 + 11 + 8.5 + 5 = 40.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 9Borr Drilling LimitedBORR | 39.9/100Thin evidence · provisional58% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.8/35 Revenue 5.7% · PAT -35.3% · OPM change -9.2 pp 62% evidence | 13.1/25 ROCE 1.4% · OPM 18.6% 76% evidence | 10.0/20 P/E 38.5× · PEG — 15% evidence | 4.0/20 RS sector -11.2% · RS bench -15.7% · 1Y 85.3%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.8 + 13.1 + 10 + 4 = 39.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
| 10Sable Offshore Corp.SOC | 31.3/100Thin evidence · provisional40% evidence | BASING | 16.8/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 4% evidence | 5.2/25 ROCE -11.5% · OPM — 61% evidence | 9.3/20 P/E 44.7× · PEG — 15% evidence | 0.0/20 RS sector -68.3% · RS bench -67.8% · 1Y -84.5%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 16.8 + 5.2 + 9.3 + 0 = 31.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral. | ||||||
Market action
Nabors Industries Ltd. has the strongest one-year price move in Oil & Gas Drilling at +135.6%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +12%. 3 of 10 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.
Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Oil & Gas Drilling itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Transocean Ltd. has the highest Revenue among the 10 Oil & Gas Drilling companies compared here, at $4,140 million. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is next at $4,002 million. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. has the highest Revenue growth at 29.7%, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Transocean Ltd. is the scale leader at $4,140 million, 3.4% ahead of Helmerich & Payne, Inc.. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.'s growth is 29.7% from a $4,002 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
Investor read: Transocean Ltd. is the scale benchmark; Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Transocean Ltd.'s growth falls below Helmerich & Payne, Inc.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. PTEN | $1.1B | -13% | Jun 2026 |
| Transocean Ltd. RIG | $1.1B | 19% | Mar 2026 |
| Helmerich & Payne, Inc. HP | $932M | -8.3% | Mar 2026 |
| Noble Corporation plc NE | $786M | -10% | Jun 2026 |
| Nabors Industries Ltd. NBR | $784M | 6.5% | Jun 2026 |
| Precision Drilling Corporation PDS | $526M | 6.1% | Jun 2026 |
| Valaris Limited VAL | $465M | -25% | Mar 2026 |
| Seadrill Limited SDRL | $358M | 6.9% | Mar 2026 |
| Borr Drilling Limited BORR | $247M | 14% | Mar 2026 |
| Sable Offshore Corp. SOC | $1M | — | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. · HP
Nabors Industries Ltd. · NBR
Noble Corporation plc · NE
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. · PTEN
Precision Drilling Corporation · PDS
Sable Offshore Corp. · SOC
Seadrill Limited · SDRL
Transocean Ltd. · RIG
Valaris Limited · VAL
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
Borr Drilling Limited · BORR
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. · HP
Nabors Industries Ltd. · NBR
Noble Corporation plc · NE
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. · PTEN
Precision Drilling Corporation · PDS
Seadrill Limited · SDRL
Transocean Ltd. · RIG
Valaris Limited · VAL
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
Noble Corporation plc has the highest OPM among the 10 Oil & Gas Drilling companies compared here, at 28.7%. Transocean Ltd. is next at 26.5%. Transocean Ltd. has the highest Margin change at +19.4 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 9 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Noble Corporation plc leads opm at 28.7%; Transocean Ltd. leads margin change at +19.4 percentage points.
Investor read: Noble Corporation plc sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noble Corporation plc NE | 29% | +7.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Transocean Ltd. RIG | 27% | +19.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Borr Drilling Limited BORR | 19% | −9.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Nabors Industries Ltd. NBR | 7.9% | +7.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Precision Drilling Corporation PDS | 7.5% | −5.1 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Seadrill Limited SDRL | 6.7% | +1.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Valaris Limited VAL | 4.3% | −18.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. PTEN | -1.3% | −2.6 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Helmerich & Payne, Inc. HP | -4.0% | −8.1 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
Borr Drilling Limited · BORR
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. · HP
Nabors Industries Ltd. · NBR
Noble Corporation plc · NE
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. · PTEN
Precision Drilling Corporation · PDS
Seadrill Limited · SDRL
Transocean Ltd. · RIG
Valaris Limited · VAL
Margin change · reported quarter history
Borr Drilling Limited · BORR
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. · HP
Nabors Industries Ltd. · NBR
Noble Corporation plc · NE
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. · PTEN
Precision Drilling Corporation · PDS
Seadrill Limited · SDRL
Transocean Ltd. · RIG
Valaris Limited · VAL
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Valaris Limited has the highest Net profit among the 10 Oil & Gas Drilling companies compared here, at $1,000 million. Borr Drilling Limited is next at $33 million. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. has the highest Profit growth at -266.2%, so level and change sit with different companies. 6 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Valaris Limited leads with $1,000 million of TTM profit, 30.3× the profit of Borr Drilling Limited. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. shows -266.2% growth from a $369 million net cash profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
Investor read: Valaris Limited sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noble Corporation plc NE | $121M | 12% | Jun 2026 |
| Transocean Ltd. RIG | $71M | 257% | Mar 2026 |
| Precision Drilling Corporation PDS | $18M | -49% | Jun 2026 |
| Nabors Industries Ltd. NBR | $4M | -93% | Jun 2026 |
| Seadrill Limited SDRL | $-7M | -110% | Mar 2026 |
| Valaris Limited VAL | $-18M | 447% | Mar 2026 |
| Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. PTEN | $-24M | -2,500% | Jun 2026 |
| Borr Drilling Limited BORR | $-29M | -104% | Mar 2026 |
| Helmerich & Payne, Inc. HP | $-56M | -1,967% | Mar 2026 |
| Sable Offshore Corp. SOC | $-197M | -9,100% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
Borr Drilling Limited · BORR
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. · HP
Nabors Industries Ltd. · NBR
Noble Corporation plc · NE
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. · PTEN
Precision Drilling Corporation · PDS
Sable Offshore Corp. · SOC
Seadrill Limited · SDRL
Transocean Ltd. · RIG
Valaris Limited · VAL
Profit growth · reported quarter history
Borr Drilling Limited · BORR
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. · HP
Nabors Industries Ltd. · NBR
Noble Corporation plc · NE
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. · PTEN
Precision Drilling Corporation · PDS
Sable Offshore Corp. · SOC
Seadrill Limited · SDRL
Transocean Ltd. · RIG
Valaris Limited · VAL
Return On Capital Employed
Transocean Ltd. has the highest ROCE among the 10 Oil & Gas Drilling companies compared here, at 1.8%. Borr Drilling Limited is next at 1.4%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +1.4 percentage points. 10 of 10 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Transocean Ltd. leads ROCE at 1.8%, 0.4 percentage points above Borr Drilling Limited. Transocean Ltd. has the strongest latest improvement at +1.4 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
Investor read: Transocean Ltd. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transocean Ltd. RIG | 1.8% | +1.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Nabors Industries Ltd. NBR | 1.4% | −0.2 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Borr Drilling Limited BORR | 1.4% | −0.6 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Seadrill Limited SDRL | 0.7% | +0.2 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Precision Drilling Corporation PDS | 0.6% | −0.7 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Valaris Limited VAL | 0.5% | −3.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Noble Corporation plc NE | 0.4% | −1.9 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. PTEN | -0.1% | +0.4 pp | Jun 2026 |
| Helmerich & Payne, Inc. HP | -0.6% | −1.4 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Sable Offshore Corp. SOC | -12% | −7.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
Borr Drilling Limited · BORR
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. · HP
Nabors Industries Ltd. · NBR
Noble Corporation plc · NE
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. · PTEN
Precision Drilling Corporation · PDS
Sable Offshore Corp. · SOC
Seadrill Limited · SDRL
Transocean Ltd. · RIG
Valaris Limited · VAL
ROCE change · reported quarter history
Borr Drilling Limited · BORR
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. · HP
Nabors Industries Ltd. · NBR
Noble Corporation plc · NE
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. · PTEN
Precision Drilling Corporation · PDS
Sable Offshore Corp. · SOC
Seadrill Limited · SDRL
Transocean Ltd. · RIG
Valaris Limited · VAL
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
No company in this Oil & Gas Drilling comparison reports a valuation figure this section can compare, so the PEG rank is empty. On P/E, Nabors Industries Ltd. is lowest at 6.25×, across 9 of 10 companies with a usable reading. PEG asks what price is being paid for growth; P/E keeps that answer anchored to the actual earnings multiple.
What the numbers say: There is not enough comparable evidence to name a reliable peg leader.
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noble Corporation plc NE | 1.5 | 40.1 | Jun 2026 |
| Helmerich & Payne, Inc. HP | 0.8 | 11.9 | Mar 2026 |
| Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. PTEN | 0.3 | 33.4 | Jun 2026 |
| Seadrill Limited SDRL | 0.1 | 65.7 | Mar 2026 |
| Valaris Limited VAL | — | 6.9 | Mar 2026 |
| Nabors Industries Ltd. NBR | — | 6.3 | Jun 2026 |
| Borr Drilling Limited BORR | — | 38.5 | Mar 2026 |
| Precision Drilling Corporation PDS | — | 703.5 | Jun 2026 |
| Sable Offshore Corp. SOC | — | 44.7 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
PEG · reported quarter history
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. · HP
Noble Corporation plc · NE
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. · PTEN
Seadrill Limited · SDRL
P/E · reported quarter history
Borr Drilling Limited · BORR
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. · HP
Nabors Industries Ltd. · NBR
Noble Corporation plc · NE
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. · PTEN
Precision Drilling Corporation · PDS
Sable Offshore Corp. · SOC
Seadrill Limited · SDRL
Valaris Limited · VAL
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Oil & Gas Drilling comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 10 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 10 Oil & Gas Drilling companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
Oil & Gas Drilling company comparison FAQs
These 20 answers restate the Oil & Gas Drilling comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 10 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Oil & Gas Drilling sector outperforming S&P 500?
Oil & Gas Drilling has outperformed S&P 500 by 28.7% over 52 weeks and 25% over 13 weeks. 3 of 10 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 7 of 10 beat the sector itself.
Which Oil & Gas Drilling company is largest by revenue?
Transocean Ltd. leads with revenue of $4,140 million, based on 5 of 10 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Oil & Gas Drilling company is growing fastest?
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. has the fastest current revenue growth at 29.7%, across 5 of 10 comparable companies.
Which Oil & Gas Drilling company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Nabors Industries Ltd. ranks first at 59.1/100 with 51.8% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
How much history does this Oil & Gas Drilling comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Which Oil & Gas Drilling company is the biggest?
Transocean Ltd. is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $4,140 million, ahead of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. at $4,002 million. That covers 5 of 10 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Oil & Gas Drilling company has the best profit margins?
Noble Corporation plc has the highest operating margin at 28.7%, from 9 of 10 comparable companies. Transocean Ltd. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +19.4 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Oil & Gas Drilling company makes the most profit?
Valaris Limited earns the most, at $1,000 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 6 of 10 comparable companies. Helmerich & Payne, Inc. has the fastest profit growth at -266.2%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Oil & Gas Drilling company earns the highest return on capital?
Transocean Ltd. leads on return on capital employed at 1.8%, across 10 of 10 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Is the Oil & Gas Drilling sector beating the market?
Oil & Gas Drilling has outperformed S&P 500 by 28.7% over the last 52 weeks and 25% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 3 of 10 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Oil & Gas Drilling stock has the strongest price momentum?
Nabors Industries Ltd. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Oil & Gas Drilling company scores highest for research priority?
Nabors Industries Ltd. scores 59.1 out of 100 with 51.8% evidence confidence, from 19.1 points on growth and earnings, 11.5 on capital efficiency, 11.5 on valuation and 17 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Oil & Gas Drilling companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 10 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Oil & Gas Drilling sector?
The 10 Oil & Gas Drilling companies on this page carry $31,994 million of combined market value. Noble Corporation plc is the largest at $6,518 million, about 20% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.
What is the Oil & Gas Drilling sector's P/E ratio?
The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 10 Oil & Gas Drilling companies on this page is 38.5×, measured on the 9 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.
How is the Oil & Gas Drilling sector performing?
3 of the 10 covered Oil & Gas Drilling companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 28.7% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.
How many Oil & Gas Drilling stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 10 listed Oil & Gas Drilling companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.