Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-31
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-07-31

Tankup Engineers Ltd

TANKUP
Engineering - Light - General

Tankup Engineers Ltd is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 95th percentile of its own range says the market knows.

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −467% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (63 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 95th percentile of its own 1-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +174.0% year on year, and −467% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the cash starts following the profit.

Price
₹1,150
P/E
127.0×
95th pctile
of its own 1-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
₹35.6 Cr
+162.7% YoY
Profit (Mar 26)
₹2.7 Cr
+174.0% YoY
Operating margin
12.9%
+0.9 pp YoY
ROCE
19%
FY26
ROIC
9.8%
vs WACC 12.0% → −2.2 pp
Cash conversion
−467%
of profit, last 3 FY
Unverified figures: Some figures on this page come from a second financial-data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source — the two do not share enough overlapping reported history to compare. They are drawn, because they are the only evidence there is, and every section carrying one is marked unverified.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Tankup Engineers Ltd trades at ₹1,150, in a confirmed uptrend and 63 weeks into that stage. That is +65.8% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 99% of a 52-week range of ₹570 to ₹1,158. On relative strength it has no relative-strength read yet.

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 63 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹1,150 it trades +65.8% versus its 200-day average and sits at 99% of its 52-week range (₹570–₹1,158).

Jul 26: ₹1,150 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 1-year window.
+65.8% versus the 200-day line, week 63 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2₹1,211₹1,019₹827₹634₹442₹1,150₹694Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26Jul 26
S2₹1,211₹1,019₹827₹634₹442₹1,150₹694Apr 26Jun 26Jul 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 4 months the stock moved +102% while the NIFTY 500 moved +3% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: no trailing-13-week read yet — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Tankup Engineers Ltd trades at 127.0× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (95th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 91.2×, measured across 1.3 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 127.0× is at the pricey end of its own range (95th percentile), against a long-run median of 91.2× measured over 1.3 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 127.0× vs a 91.2× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 1.3-year window; loss-period spikes above 144× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
at the pricey end of its own range (95th percentile)
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
155.6×₹108116.7×₹81.177.8×₹54.038.9×₹27.00.0×₹0.0×127.30×₹9Apr 25Aug 25Dec 25Apr 26Jul 26
155.6×₹108116.7×₹81.177.8×₹54.038.9×₹27.00.0×₹0.0×127.30×₹9Apr 25Dec 25Jul 26
P/E
127.0×
95th percentile of 1y

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Tankup Engineers Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 4 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +182.0% in FY26, profit +214.5% Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn. Turnaround-year spikes shown pinned (▲).
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
803%332%588%217%374%102%160%−13%−55%−128%%%182%214.5%FY22FY24FY26
803%332%588%217%374%102%160%−13%−55%−128%%%182%214.5%FY22FY24FY26
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from
RevenueProfit
237%318%178%224%120%129%61%34%0.0%−60%%%162.7%174%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
237%318%178%224%120%129%61%34%0.0%−60%%%162.7%174%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
ROCE Annual readings — the quarterly balance-sheet pieces this curve needs are not held for this stock, so the returns read moves once a year and carries less weight in the call.
the return curve, annual readings
ROCE
65%53%40%28%16%%18.9%FY23FY24FY26
65%53%40%28%16%%18.9%FY23FY24FY26
ROCE
Falling
latest 18.9% · span 18.9%–61.4%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+182.0%+69.2%
Profit+214.5%+82.2%
EPS+131.5%−34.1%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
+162.7%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Mar 26)
+174.0%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
152.9%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

54.7/100 — rank 4 of 8 in Engineering - Light - General · 41% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers

Tankup Engineers Ltd scores 54.7 out of 100 against the 8 companies it is compared with in Engineering - Light - General, ranking 4. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 18.3 + 16 + 8.5 + 11.9 = 54.7. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Tankup Engineers Ltd reported ₹35.6 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +162.7% year on year. That is the 3rd straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 152.9% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹57.3 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹77.6 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹57.3 Cr (+182.0% on the year), capping 4 years at 152.9% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹35.6 Cr, +162.7% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

FY26 revenue ₹57.3 Cr (+182.0% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
152.9% a year over 4 years
RevenueYoY growth
62803%46588%31374%15160%0−55%₹ Cr%₹57182%FY22FY24FY26
62803%46588%31374%15160%0−55%₹ Cr%₹57182%FY22FY24FY26
Mar 26: ₹35.6 Cr (+162.7% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
3rd straight quarter of growth
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
38237%29178%19120%1061%00.0%₹ Cr%₹36162.7%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
38237%29178%19120%1061%00.0%₹ Cr%₹36162.7%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +134.0% growth against the decade's 152.9% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Tankup Engineers Ltd's operating margin is 12.9% in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.9 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved −4.7 percentage points. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 6.4% to 17.6%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 12.9%, +0.9 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 6.4%–17.6%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −4.7 pp year on year while gross margin went −4.8 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY26: 12.6% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 5-year window.
within a 6.4–17.6% band over 5 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
18%7.5%15%4.1%12%0.8%8.8%−2.6%5.5%−6.0%%%12.6%0.1%FY22FY24FY26
18%7.5%15%4.1%12%0.8%8.8%−2.6%5.5%−6.0%%%12.6%0.1%FY22FY24FY26
Mar 26: 12.9% operating margin (+0.9 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
18%1.4%16%−0.5%15%−2.3%13%−4.2%12%−6.1%%%12.9%0.9%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
18%1.4%16%−0.5%15%−2.3%13%−4.2%12%−6.1%%%12.9%0.9%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Tankup Engineers Ltd earned ₹2.7 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +174.0% year on year. It is the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹4.8 Cr. The 4-year compound rate is 212.7%. That is 7.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹1.5 Cr.

Mar 26 profit was ₹2.7 Cr, +174.0% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹4.8 Cr (+214.5%), and the 4-year compound rate is 212.7%.

FY26 profit ₹4.8 Cr (+214.5% YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 5-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
212.7% a year over 4 years
Net profitYoY growth
51,601%41,161%3721%1280%0−160%₹ Cr%₹5214.5%FY22FY24FY26
51,601%41,161%3721%1280%0−160%₹ Cr%₹5214.5%FY22FY24FY26
Mar 26: ₹2.7 Cr (+174.0% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
2nd straight quarter of growth
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
3.0318%2.2224%1.5129%0.734%0.0−60%₹ Cr%₹3174%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
3.0318%2.2224%1.5129%0.734%0.0−60%₹ Cr%₹3174%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +162.7% and the margin +0.9 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +144.0% vs revenue +134.0%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years −467% of Tankup Engineers Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY26 that was ₹−34.4 Cr of operating cash against ₹4.8 Cr of profit. After ₹2.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−36.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹−34.4 Cr against reported profit of ₹4.8 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−36.0 Cr after ₹2.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is −467% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹−34.4 Cr vs profit ₹4.8 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 5-year window, annual resolution.
−467% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
8−4−16−27−39₹ Cr₹−34₹5₹−36FY22FY24FY26
8−4−16−27−39₹ Cr₹−34₹5₹−36FY22FY24FY26
FY26: CFO = −719% of profit (three-year rate −467%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash.
Conversion100%
204%−173%−550%−927%−1,304%%−719%FY22FY24FY26
204%−173%−550%−927%−1,304%%−719%FY22FY24FY26

🚨 Why conversion sits at −467%: the cash cycle stretched 194 days between FY22 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: conversion is below par and the cash cycle has stretched 194 days — the next section's job is to find where the cash is stuck.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Tankup Engineers Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 370 days in FY26, up from 177 days in FY22. Capital spending ran ₹2.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹57.3 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.2 Cr, so roughly ₹58.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 246 days, inventory at 164 days — roughly 5.4 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 370 days, looser than FY22's 177.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 164 days to sell; customers pay about 246 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 40 days — netting out to the 370-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹57.3 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.2 Cr — so the 370-day loop keeps roughly ₹58.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a 370-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 5-year window.
+194 days vs FY22
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
39730120510913days370d164d246d40dFY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
39730120510913days370d164d246d40dFY22FY24FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹2.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹1.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹2.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹0.0 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
a build-out
CapexWork-in-progress
2.21.61.10.50.0₹ Cr₹2₹0FY23FY24FY26
2.21.61.10.50.0₹ Cr₹2₹0FY23FY24FY26

The synthesis: the working-capital loop is the cash sink the router flagged — watch the cycle, not the P&L.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Tankup Engineers Ltd earns a ROCE of 19% in FY26. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −2.2 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 8.3% net margin on 0.79× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 19%.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 8.3% net margin × 0.79× asset turns × 2.44× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 16.0% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 9.8% − 12.0% = a −2.2 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY26: ROCE 19% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line). 4-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the full ladder
ROCEWACC
65%51%37%22%8.0%%18.9%FY23FY24FY26
65%51%37%22%8.0%%18.9%FY23FY24FY26
11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Tankup Engineers Ltd carries ₹36.1 Cr of borrowings against ₹29.7 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 1.21. Operating profit covers the interest bill 4×. Over 4 years borrowings went from ₹1.4 Cr to ₹36.1 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹2.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY26: borrowings of ₹36.1 Cr against equity of ₹29.7 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 1.21. Operating profit covers the interest bill 4×. Over 4 years borrowings went from ₹1.4 Cr to ₹36.1 Cr while capital spending ran ₹2.0 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.

FY26: borrowings ₹36.1 Cr at 1.21× equity Borrowings by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window. Quarterly balance-sheet history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
the debt trajectory
BorrowingsDebt-to-equity
397.6×295.8×194.1×102.3×00.5×₹ Cr×₹361.21×FY22FY23FY24FY25FY26
397.6×295.8×194.1×102.3×00.5×₹ Cr×₹361.21×FY22FY24FY26
12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

No holder of Tankup Engineers Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — .

A quiet register: no holder moved a full point in two years Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 3 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
80%58%37%16%−5.7%%73.7%0.2%7.3%18.9%Apr 25Sep 25Mar 26
80%58%37%16%−5.7%%73.7%0.2%7.3%18.9%Apr 25Sep 25Mar 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Tankup Engineers Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

14 · Related companies · Engineering - Light - General
CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Axis Solutions Ltd511144 57.2/100Mixed-positive evidence69% evidence BREAKING OUT 16.6/35 Revenue 18.9% · PAT -14.7% · OPM change 2.7 pp 95% evidence 17.9/25 ROCE 23.3% · OPM 12.6% 76% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 54× · PEG — 15% evidence 12.5/20 RS sector 0% · RS bench 123.7% · 1Y 1915.9%11 of 11 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 16.6 + 17.9 + 10.2 + 12.5 = 57.2 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2Omnitech Engineering LtdOMNI 56.1/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence TURNING 19.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -7 pp 41% evidence 16.4/25 ROCE 17.6% · OPM 33% 100% evidence 10.1/20 P/E 90.4× · PEG 1.64 65% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —3 of 3 weeks ahead 0% evidence
Exact sum: 19.6 + 16.4 + 10.1 + 10 = 56.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3Shree Refrigerations Ltd544458 54.9/100Thin evidence · provisional36% evidence TURNING 18.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 2 pp 26% evidence 14.9/25 ROCE 13.9% · OPM 26% 76% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 51.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.2/20 RS sector — · RS bench 32.8% · 1Y 76.9%11 of 11 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 18.2 + 14.9 + 10.6 + 11.2 = 54.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Tankup Engineers Ltdthis pageTANKUP 54.7/100Thin evidence · provisional41% evidence TURNING 18.3/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 0.9 pp 26% evidence 16.0/25 ROCE 19% · OPM 12.9% 95% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 127× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.9/20 RS sector — · RS bench 75.8% · 1Y —2 of 2 weeks ahead 25% evidence
Exact sum: 18.3 + 16 + 8.5 + 11.9 = 54.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
5Lloyds Engineering Works Ltd Partly PaidupLLOYDSENPP 48.7/100Thin evidence · provisional8% evidence 17.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 0% evidence 10.1/25 ROCE — · OPM — 19% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 34.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y -53.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead to 2026-02-01 0% evidence
Exact sum: 17.5 + 10.1 + 11.1 + 10 = 48.7 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
6Filtron Engineers Ltd531191 43.1/100Thin evidence · provisional33% evidence 18.7/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 243.4 pp 17% evidence 5.6/25 ROCE 11.3% · OPM 3.6% 76% evidence 8.9/20 P/E 122× · PEG — 15% evidence 9.9/20 RS sector — · RS bench 27.1% · 1Y 1038.9%0 of 5 weeks ahead to 2026-07-05 25% evidence
Exact sum: 18.7 + 5.6 + 8.9 + 9.9 = 43.1 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Sunita Tools Ltd544001 39.9/100Thin evidence · provisional45% evidence 15.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -9.7 pp 26% evidence 9.3/25 ROCE 10.1% · OPM 15.2% 76% evidence 9.4/20 P/E 103× · PEG — 15% evidence 6.1/20 RS sector -35.6% · RS bench 27.8% · 1Y 31.7%0 of 8 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.1 + 9.3 + 9.4 + 6.1 = 39.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8C2C Advanced Systems LtdC2C 33.6/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 13.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -47 pp 26% evidence 5.7/25 ROCE 13.5% · OPM -8% 95% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 24.4× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -60% · RS bench -48.7% · 1Y -57.9%3 of 10 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.4 + 5.7 + 11.5 + 3 = 33.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Tankup Engineers Ltd's share price today?

Tankup Engineers Ltd trades at ₹1,150. The company is valued at ₹609 Cr. The stock sits at 99% of its 52-week range of ₹570–₹1,158, +65.8% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 63 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.

What were Tankup Engineers Ltd's latest quarterly results?

Tankup Engineers Ltd reported revenue of ₹35.6 Cr and net profit of ₹2.7 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Revenue rose 162.7% and profit rose 174.0% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹5.17. The operating margin was 12.9%, 0.9 pp higher than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Tankup Engineers Ltd's revenue?

Tankup Engineers Ltd reported revenue of ₹35.6 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, +162.7% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹57.3 Cr (+182.0%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 152.9% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Tankup Engineers Ltd's profit?

Tankup Engineers Ltd earned ₹2.7 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +174.0% year on year — the 2nd straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹4.8 Cr. The operating margin ran 12.9% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Tankup Engineers Ltd's market cap?

Tankup Engineers Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹609 Cr at a share price of ₹1,150. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Tankup Engineers Ltd's P/E ratio?

Tankup Engineers Ltd trades at a P/E of 127.0×, at the 95th percentile of its own 1-year range, against a long-run median of 91.2×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Tankup Engineers Ltd pay a dividend?

No — Tankup Engineers Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 5 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Tankup Engineers Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, Tankup Engineers Ltd looks expensive against its own history: its P/E of 127.0× sits at the 95th percentile of its 1-year range (long-run median 91.2×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Tankup Engineers Ltd growing?

Yes — Tankup Engineers Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +162.7% year on year, profit +174.0%, and the margin +0.9 pp at 12.9%. The 4-year compound rates are 152.9% (revenue) and 212.7% (profit). The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 31 July 2026.

How is Tankup Engineers Ltd performing?

Tankup Engineers Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 63 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 162.7% and profit rose 174.0% year on year. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Tankup Engineers Ltd in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 63 of stage 2), trading +65.8% versus its 200-day average and at 99% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.

Will Tankup Engineers Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for Tankup Engineers Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹1,150, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 63 weeks in. Its P/E of 127.0× sits at the 95th percentile of its own 1-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.

Who owns Tankup Engineers Ltd?

Promoters hold 73.7% of Tankup Engineers Ltd, foreign institutions 0.2%, domestic institutions 7.3% and the public 18.9% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 31 July 2026.

Does Tankup Engineers Ltd have too much debt?

It carries real leverage — Tankup Engineers Ltd's debt-to-equity is 1.21, and operating profit covers the interest bill 4×. FY26 borrowings were ₹36.1 Cr against equity of ₹29.7 Cr. Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Tankup Engineers Ltd's capex?

Tankup Engineers Ltd spent ₹2.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹2.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is Tankup Engineers Ltd's cash flow?

Tankup Engineers Ltd generated ₹−34.4 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−36.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹2.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹4.8 Cr, so operating cash ran behind profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Tankup Engineers Ltd's profit real cash?

Not fully — over the last 3 fiscal years, −467% of Tankup Engineers Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹−34.4 Cr against reported profit of ₹4.8 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into the working-capital cycle. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 31 July 2026.

Where is Tankup Engineers Ltd in its business cycle?

Tankup Engineers Ltd's FY26 operating margin was 12.6%, against a 5-year band of 6.4%–17.6%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 12.9%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.

What could break the Tankup Engineers Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only −467% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.

Is Tankup Engineers Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: Tankup Engineers Ltd is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/E at the 95th percentile of its own range says the market knows. The sharpest open question: whether the cash starts following the profit. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI