Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-31
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-07-31

SMT Engineering Ltd

SMTEL
Finance - Investment/Others

SMT Engineering Ltd is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/BV at the 100th percentile of its own range says the market knows.

The sharpest disagreement: the engine is strong, but at the 100th percentile of its own range you are paying full price for it.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (58 weeks in) while the P/BV sits at the 100th percentile of its own 9-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +5,700.0% year on year, with the the net margin at 8.6%. What settles it: whether the earnings grow into the multiple.

Price
₹448
+4,498.5% 1Y
P/BV
10.3×
100th pctile
of its own 9-year range
Revenue (Dec 25)
₹26.9 Cr
+7,164.9% YoY
Profit (Dec 25)
₹2.3 Cr
+5,700.0% YoY
Net margin
8.6%
−2.2 pp YoY
ROE
7%
FY25
Unverified figures: Some figures on this page come from a second financial-data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source — the two do not share enough overlapping reported history to compare. They are drawn, because they are the only evidence there is, and every section carrying one is marked unverified.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

SMT Engineering Ltd trades at ₹448, in a confirmed uptrend and 58 weeks into that stage. That is +195.1% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 100% of a 52-week range of ₹6 to ₹448. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 38 straight weeks.

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 58 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹448 it trades +195.1% versus its 200-day average and sits at 100% of its 52-week range (₹6–₹448).

Mar 26: ₹448 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 2-year window.
+195.1% versus the 200-day line, week 58 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2₹484₹355₹226₹97.2₹−31.8₹448₹152Mar 24Jun 25Sep 25Dec 25Mar 26
S2₹484₹355₹226₹97.2₹−31.8₹448₹152Mar 24Sep 25Mar 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2017 Each cell is one week from 2017 to now (60 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Jun 17Mar 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 8.7 years the stock moved +9,501% while the NIFTY 500 moved +166% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 38 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

02 · Valuation

Valuation For a bank we price the book, not the earnings: P/BV is what the market pays for each ₹1 of the bank's net worth. A bank below 1× book is priced below the value of what it owns, net of what it owes.

SMT Engineering Ltd trades at 10.3× P/BV, about the priciest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/BV is 1.6×, measured across 8.7 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/BV of 10.3× is about the priciest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 1.6× measured over 8.7 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

The honest context for that discount: a bank earning about 7% on its equity is worth less per rupee of book, and the market has priced that in rather than overlooked it. The discount closes only if the returns themselves improve.

P/BV 10.3× vs a 1.6× long-run median P/BV, weekly (left axis); book value per share, weekly (right axis). 8.7-year window; brief peaks above 4.8× shown pinned at the top. The book value / share bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
about the priciest it has ever traded
P/BVMedianBook value / share (quarterly)
5.2×₹69.23.9×₹51.92.6×₹34.61.3×₹17.30.0×₹0.0×4.80×₹44Jun 17Jul 25Oct 25Dec 25Mar 26
5.2×₹69.23.9×₹51.92.6×₹34.61.3×₹17.30.0×₹0.0×4.80×₹44Jun 17Oct 25Mar 26
P/BV
10.3×
100th percentile of 9y

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the book-value line underneath it, not the multiple.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

SMT Engineering Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 7 quarters across 0 curves, on partial evidence.

Growth, year by year: revenue +600.0% in FY25 Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn. Turnaround-year spikes shown pinned (▲).
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
656%−84%453%−142%250%−200%47%−258%−156%−316%%%600%−100%FY15FY20FY25
656%−84%453%−142%250%−200%47%−258%−156%−316%%%600%−100%FY15FY20FY25
Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from · revenue accelerating
RevenueProfitEPS
301.2%346%300.6%180%300.0%15%299.4%−151%298.8%−316%%%300%300%−260.5%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
301.2%346%300.6%180%300.0%15%299.4%−151%298.8%−316%%%300%300%−260.5%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue+600.0%+175.9%+83.8%+26.5%
EPS+120.5%+29.9%
Share price+4,498.5%
Revenue YoY (Dec 25)
+7,164.9%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Profit YoY (Dec 25)
+5,700.0%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
26.5%
long-run compound pace
04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

No sector-relative score — SMT Engineering Ltd is not present in the sector comparison for Finance - Investment/Others.

The score is a rank WITHIN a peer set: every metric is scored by percentile against the other members. Without the peer set there is no score to state, so none is invented here.

05 · Revenue

Revenue For a bank, revenue is everything the franchise earns — interest on the loan book plus fee and other income.

SMT Engineering Ltd reported ₹26.9 Cr of income in the Dec 25 quarter, +7,164.9% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 26.5% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹21.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹108 Cr.

FY25 revenue came in at ₹21.0 Cr (+600.0% on the year), capping 10 years at 26.5% compound. The latest quarter (Dec 25) printed ₹26.9 Cr, +7,164.9% year on year.

FY25 revenue ₹21.0 Cr (+600.0% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
26.5% a year over 10 years
RevenueYoY growth
23656%17453%11250%647%0−156%₹ Cr%₹21600%FY15FY20FY25
23656%17453%11250%647%0−156%₹ Cr%₹21600%FY15FY20FY25
Dec 25: ₹26.9 Cr (+7,164.9% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
377,683%285,805%183,926%92,048%0170%₹ Cr%₹277,164.9%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
377,683%285,805%183,926%92,048%0170%₹ Cr%₹277,164.9%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +4,550.2% growth against the decade's 26.5% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +3,001.1% over the last 4 quarters against +1,902.1%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.

06 · Net margin

Net margin Net margin — what the bank keeps of every ₹100 of revenue after every cost, provision and tax. It is the cleanest single margin we can read for a lender.

SMT Engineering Ltd's net margin is 8.6% in the Dec 25 quarter, −2.2 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 10 fiscal years the net margin has ranged −66.7% to 50.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's net margin is 8.6%, −2.2 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 10 fiscal years the net margin has ranged −66.7%–50.0%.

Why: the numbers show the net margin move clearly, but the cost lines behind it sit below what we hold — so we state the move without inventing its driver.

FY25: 9.5% Net margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 10-year window.
within a −66.7–50.0% band over 10 years
net marginYoY change (pp)
59%88%25%46%−8.4%4.8%−42%−37%−76%−78%%%9.5%76.2%FY15FY20FY25
59%88%25%46%−8.4%4.8%−42%−37%−76%−78%%%9.5%76.2%FY15FY20FY25
Dec 25: 8.6% net margin (−2.2 pp YoY) Quarterly net margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Net profit as a share of total revenue, per quarter.
Net marginYoY change (pp)
22,155%1,847%16,157%−4,147%10,159%−10,141%4,161%−16,136%−1,837%−22,130%%%8.6%−2.2%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
22,155%1,847%16,157%−4,147%10,159%−10,141%4,161%−16,136%−1,837%−22,130%%%8.6%−2.2%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

SMT Engineering Ltd earned ₹2.3 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, +5,700.0% year on year. It is the 3rd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹2.0 Cr. That is 8.6% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹0.0 Cr. 2 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Dec 25 profit was ₹2.3 Cr, +5,700.0% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY25 printed ₹2.0 Cr (null).

FY25 profit ₹2.0 Cr (null YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
2−98.8%1−99.4%0−100.0%−1−100.6%−2−101.2%₹ Cr%₹2−100%FY15FY20FY25
2−98.8%1−99.4%0−100.0%−1−100.6%−2−101.2%₹ Cr%₹2−100%FY15FY20FY25
Dec 25: ₹2.3 Cr (+5,700.0% YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
3rd straight quarter of growth
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
76,164%44,483%12,803%−21,122%−6−558%₹ Cr%₹25,700%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25
76,164%44,483%12,803%−21,122%−6−558%₹ Cr%₹25,700%Mar 23Jun 24Dec 25

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +7,164.9% and the margin −2.2 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +3,956.6% vs revenue +4,550.2%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

08 · Asset quality — the ladder

Asset quality — the ladder Gross NPA is the slice of the loan book where repayments have stopped. Net NPA is what remains after the money already set aside against those loans. Falling is healing; rising is damage arriving.

Loan-book quality history is not available for SMT Engineering Ltd, so this section names the gap rather than estimating a ratio. No gross or net non-performing-asset series is filed in a form this page can read, and none is inferred from the profit line. The income, margin and return sections above carry the evidence this business does report.

We do not hold quarterly loan-book quality numbers for this bank, so this section states that plainly rather than working around it.

Why: loan-book quality is the engine room of a bank, and its drivers — slippages, recoveries, provisioning — sit below what we hold for this name; the sections around it carry the reads we can stand behind.

09 · The loan book

The loan book We read the loan book through revenue — when the book grows, revenue grows with it. It is a rough proxy, and we say so: rate moves and fee swings can shift it a few points in any one year.

SMT Engineering Ltd's revenue grew +600.0% in FY25 to ₹21.0 Cr, so the book is growing. The latest quarter ran +7,164.9% year on year. The net margin on that income is 8.6%, −2.2 percentage points against a year ago. Interest income is a proxy for the book; rate moves can shift it a few points in any one year.

FY25 revenue was ₹21.0 Cr, +600.0% on the year, and the latest quarter ran +7,164.9% year on year. The net margin on that revenue is 8.6% this quarter (−2.2 pp YoY) — growth with a narrowing margin on it.

FY25: revenue ₹21.0 Cr (+600.0% YoY) with the net margin at 9.5% Revenue by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars, left); net margin, % (line, right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
RevenueNet margin
2359%1725%11−8.4%6−42%0−76%₹ Cr%₹219.5%FY15FY17FY20FY22FY25
2359%1725%11−8.4%6−42%0−76%₹ Cr%₹219.5%FY15FY20FY25

The synthesis: a lender compounds when the book grows while the margin holds and the loan book stays clean — gross NPA is the loan-quality read we carry here.

10 · Returns on equity and assets

Returns on equity and assets Two numbers usually rate a lender: ROE — what it earns on shareholder money — and ROA — what it earns on everything it deploys.

A clean annual return-on-equity ladder is not held for SMT Engineering Ltd. For an insurer especially the standard bank ratios are not the right lens, so this page does not force them onto the filings rather than estimating a series it cannot support. The revenue, margin and ownership sections above and below are the reads this page stands behind.

We do not hold a clean annual return-on-equity series for SMT Engineering Ltd — for an insurer especially, the standard bank ratios are not the right lens, so this page does not force them. The revenue, margin and ownership sections above and below are the reads we stand behind.

11 · Debt

Debt

For a bank, borrowings are raw material, not a warning sign — solvency is read through the returns and the loan book. A manufacturer’s debt is a claim against its profits, so the debt-to-equity lens that works everywhere else misleads on a lender and is not applied here.

A manufacturer’s debt is a claim against its profits; a bank’s borrowings are its inventory — money taken in to be lent out. The debt lens that works everywhere else misleads here, so this page does not apply it. The solvency questions for a bank — is the loan book sound, is the equity earning — are read through the loan-book and returns sections above.

12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Promoters cut 7.4 points of SMT Engineering Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 67.4% of the company. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Promoters: −7.4 points over 8 quarters to 67.4%.

🚨 Why the register moved: promoters drove it (−7.4 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters −74.5 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 25 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 2 year-ends held.
PromotersPublic
108%79%50%21%−7.6%%0.4%99.6%Mar 24Mar 25
108%79%50%21%−7.6%%0.4%99.6%Mar 24Mar 25
Promoters cut 7.4 points over 8 quarters Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 12 quarters.
PromotersPublic
108%79%50%21%−7.6%%67.4%32.6%Jun 23Sep 24Feb 26
108%79%50%21%−7.6%%67.4%32.6%Jun 23Sep 24Feb 26
13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

SMT Engineering Ltd: the Z-score is omitted — it was built for manufacturers, not banks, and applying it here would be theatre. The Z-score was built for manufacturers and is not applied to banks and lenders, so solvency here is read from the capital and asset-quality lines instead.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is omitted — it was built for manufacturers, not banks, and applying it here would be theatre.

14 · Related companies

No sector comparison is shown here — not present in the sector comparison.

15 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is SMT Engineering Ltd's share price today?

SMT Engineering Ltd trades at ₹448, +4,498.5% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹741 Cr. The stock sits at 100% of its 52-week range of ₹6–₹448, +195.1% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 58 weeks in. — as of 31 July 2026.

What were SMT Engineering Ltd's latest quarterly results?

SMT Engineering Ltd reported total income of ₹26.9 Cr and net profit of ₹2.3 Cr for the Dec 25 quarter. Income rose 7,164.9% and profit rose 5,700.0% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹1.40. The net margin was 8.6%, 2.2 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is SMT Engineering Ltd's revenue?

SMT Engineering Ltd reported revenue of ₹26.9 Cr in the Dec 25 quarter, +7,164.9% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was ₹21.0 Cr (+600.0%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at 26.5% a year. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is SMT Engineering Ltd's profit?

SMT Engineering Ltd earned ₹2.3 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, +5,700.0% year on year — the 3rd straight quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹2.0 Cr. The net margin ran 8.6% in the latest quarter. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is SMT Engineering Ltd's market cap?

SMT Engineering Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹741 Cr at a share price of ₹448. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 31 July 2026.

What is SMT Engineering Ltd's P/BV ratio?

SMT Engineering Ltd trades at a P/BV of 10.3×, at the 100th percentile of its own 9-year range, against a long-run median of 1.6×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 31 July 2026.

Does SMT Engineering Ltd pay a dividend?

No — SMT Engineering Ltd has recorded a dividend payout of 0% of profit in each of its last 10 reported fiscal years, so there is no payout history to quote. That is a reading of the filed annual statements, not an estimate. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is SMT Engineering Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, SMT Engineering Ltd looks expensive against its own history: its P/BV of 10.3× sits at the 100th percentile of its 9-year range (long-run median 1.6×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is SMT Engineering Ltd growing?

Yes — SMT Engineering Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +7,164.9% year on year, profit +5,700.0%, and the the net margin −2.2 pp at 8.6%. The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 31 July 2026.

How is SMT Engineering Ltd performing?

SMT Engineering Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 58 weeks in. Its latest quarter's income rose 7,164.9% and profit rose 5,700.0% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been ahead on a trailing-13-week view for 38 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is SMT Engineering Ltd in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 58 of stage 2), trading +195.1% versus its 200-day average and at 100% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 31 July 2026.

Is SMT Engineering Ltd beating the market?

On recent form, yes — SMT Engineering Ltd has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 38 straight weeks, the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 8.7 years the stock moved +9,501% against the NIFTY 500's +166% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 31 July 2026.

Will SMT Engineering Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for SMT Engineering Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹448, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 58 weeks in. Its P/BV of 10.3× sits at the 100th percentile of its own 9-year range. — as of 31 July 2026.

Who owns SMT Engineering Ltd?

Promoters hold 67.4% of SMT Engineering Ltd, foreign institutions null%, domestic institutions null% and the public 32.6% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Promoters cut 7.4 points over 8 quarters. — as of 31 July 2026.

Is SMT Engineering Ltd's loan book healthy?

We do not hold quarterly loan-book quality numbers for SMT Engineering Ltd, so this page says that plainly. The cleanest available reads are revenue growth (+600.0% in FY25) and the net margin on it (8.6%) — as of 31 July 2026.

Where is SMT Engineering Ltd in its business cycle?

SMT Engineering Ltd's FY25 net margin was 9.5%, against a 10-year band of −66.7%–50.0%: mid-band by its own history — neither the peak that precedes mean-reversion nor the trough that precedes recovery. The latest quarter ran 8.6%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 31 July 2026.

What could break the SMT Engineering Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: the engine is strong, but at the 100th percentile of its own range you are paying full price for it. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 31 July 2026.

Is SMT Engineering Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: SMT Engineering Ltd is strength at full price. The numbers are improving — and a P/BV at the 100th percentile of its own range says the market knows. The sharpest open question: whether the earnings grow into the multiple. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 31 July 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI