KP Green Engineering share price today

KP Green Engineering Ltd's share price was ₹280.45 at the close on 5 November 2026. It has been falling for 36 weeks. That is 19.4% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹260 and ₹552, and at that close it sat 7% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today KP Green Engineering Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 36 weeks running.

Over the last 2.6 years the share price moved +34% while the NIFTY 500 moved +9%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 7 November 2025. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

For January to March 2026 (the quarter ended 31 March 2026), KP Green Engineering reported revenue of ₹714 crore, up 65.3% from ₹432 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹77.0 crore, up 67.4% from ₹46.0 crore.

KP Green Engineering results: January to March 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for April to June 2026, were due by 14 August 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter). This page shows them once our weekly data update has read them.

KP Green Engineering's management discussed these results on a call held on 13 May 2026; what it said is further down this page.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 31 March 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

KP Green Engineering closed at ₹280.45 on 5 November 2026, down 49.2% from ₹551.55 a year earlier (7 November 2025). Its highest weekly close since March 2024 was ₹676.95 on 18 May 2024.

KP Green Engineering share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 5 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

122 weekly closes from 22 March 2024 to 5 November 2026.

5 Nov 2026: KP Green Engineering closed at ₹280.45, up 5.6% on the week and up 4.1% on the month. 13 May 2026: KP Green Engineering held its results call for January to March 2026. Management guided: FY27 revenue growth minimum 40-50% year-on-year (CMD group-level vision extending to 2030)

Earlier

• Results for January to March 2026: Revenue up 65.3% and profit up 67.4% on a year earlier.

The NSE corporate-actions record has no dividend for KP Green Engineering since its first NSE close in our records (22 March 2024), so this page cannot show amounts per share.

Yes. KP Green Engineering Ltd paid out 2% of its profit as dividends in FY26, and it paid a dividend in 2 of its last 7 reported years.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

On the call for January to March 2026, held on 13 May 2026, KP Green Engineering's management guided: FY27 revenue growth minimum 40-50% year-on-year (CMD group-level vision extending to 2030)

Moinul Kadwa, on the call for January to March 2026

What management guided

• FY27 operating margin goal 16-20% range.
• ₹1,800 crore order book expected to be fully executed within FY27.
• FY27 capacity utilization expected 45-60% range from current 30-34%.
• Bidding pipeline exceeds ₹3,000 crore with 60-70% success ratio on tenders.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for January to March 2026, 13 May 2026.

When KP Green Engineering reports April to June 2026, these are the 4 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: FY27 revenue must exceed ₹1,800-1,875 crore (40-50% growth on ₹1,250 crore FY26 base) and management must deliver on commitment to fully execute ₹1,800 crore order book within year, validates execution capability and growth goal credibility.

KP Green Engineering is on one of our India lists: Power & green energy stocks.

KP Green Engineering Ltd earned ₹77.0 Cr of net profit in the Mar 2026 quarter, +67.4% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 5th quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹136 Cr. Over 6 years profit has grown 102.0% a year on average. That is 10.8% of the quarter's revenue.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹24.0 Cr.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹136 Cr (+83.8% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +65.3% on a year earlier and the margin moved +5.0 percentage points. Most of the change came from keeping more of each sale.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +104.8% and revenue +99.1%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra rupee of revenue adds more to profit.

KP Green Engineering Ltd reported ₹714 Cr of revenue in the Mar 2026 quarter, +65.3% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 5th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 6 years it has grown 71.5% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,246 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

FY26 revenue was ₹1,246 Cr, +79.3% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +99.1% on average, against 71.5% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

KP Green Engineering Ltd's operating margin was 21.0% in the Mar 2026 quarter, 5.0 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Its latest full-year margin is the highest it has ever reported. Over the last four quarters it has moved +7.0 percentage points. Across 7 years it has been between 10.0% and 20.0%.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

The latest quarter is above every full year in that period.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +7.0 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +5.0 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

As noted under valuation: when margins are at a record, every ratio built on profit looks better than usual, so a low multiple can mislead.

Over the last 3 years, 55% of KP Green Engineering Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, a gap worth watching. In FY26 it brought in ₹155 Cr of operating cash against ₹136 Cr of profit. After ₹360 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹205 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 55% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 20 days shorter between FY21 and FY26, so cash that used to wait in the business now arrives sooner. When less than 70% of profit comes in as cash, it is the thing to watch on this page.

What to look at next: the bigger use of cash is spending on new assets, at 17.2× depreciation over three years. The next section checks what that spending is building.

KP Green Engineering Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 150 days in FY26, down from 170 days in FY21. It spent ₹569 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 93 days to pay, and stock sits for 195 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹1,246 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹3.4 Cr, so roughly ₹512 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 93 days to pay and stock sat for 195 days, about 6.4 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of 150 days, shorter than FY21's 170.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 195 days. Customers pay about 93 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 138 days. Together that makes the 150-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹569 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹33.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹13.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

KP Green Engineering Ltd's P/E is 9.6×, near the low end of its own history: it has been lower only 3% of the time. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 37.3×, over 2.4 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Keep one thing in mind: margins are the best this company has ever reported. A multiple that looks low against its own past can mislead when profit is at a record. If margins fall back, today's multiple is higher than it looks.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +84.7% while the price moved −49.2%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

KP Green Engineering Ltd's business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 5 quarters of 1 measure, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

KP Green Engineering Ltd earned a ROCE of 37% in FY26. That is up from a low of 15% in FY21. We cannot compare its return on capital used with its cost of capital from the data we have. It comes from a 10.9% net margin and 0.79× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 10.9% net margin × 0.79× asset turnover × 3.47× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 29.9% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

KP Green Engineering Ltd had ₹349 Cr of borrowings against ₹458 Cr of equity in FY26, so its debt is 0.76× its equity. Its operating profit is 6 times its interest bill. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹21.0 Cr to ₹349 Cr. Over the last 3 of those years it spent ₹569 Cr on assets.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Interest cover shows how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low debt and high cover are the safe combination.

Part of the spending on assets is being paid for with borrowed money.

Foreign institutions cut their stake in KP Green Engineering Ltd by 7.3 percentage points over 4 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Foreign institutions now own 0.3% of the company. Domestic institutions moved −1.3 points over the same period, to 0.1%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Foreign institutions: −7.3 points over 4 quarters, to 0.3%; Domestic institutions: −1.3 points over 4 quarters, to 0.1%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 4 quarters, to 66.6%.

Why the owners changed: foreign institutions drove it (−7.3 points), together with domestic institutions (−1.3 points). They reduced their stake.

For KP Green Engineering Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

There is no score against its industry: KP Green Engineering Ltd is not present in the sector comparison for Solar EPC.

The score ranks a company within its industry: each measure is scored against the other members. Without that group there is no score, so none is shown.

No sector comparison is shown here, not present in the sector comparison.

KP Green Engineering is the 4th largest of 5 Solar EPC companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Waaree Renewable Technologies, Sterling & Wilson Renewable Energy and Oriana Power. Just below it: Solarworld Energy Solutions.

Solar EPC companies close in size

1. Waaree Renewable Technologies Ltd ₹7,247 crore
2. Sterling & Wilson Renewable Energy Ltd ₹3,175 crore
3. Oriana Power Ltd ₹2,344 crore
4. KP Green Engineering Ltd ₹1,402 crore
5. Solarworld Energy Solutions Ltd ₹911 crore

All 5 Solar EPC companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1416. D-Link India Ltd ₹1,407 crore · IT Networking Equipment
1417. Alicon Castalloy Ltd ₹1,405 crore · Castings, Forgings & Fastners
1418. KP Green Engineering Ltd ₹1,402 crore
1419. Rajputana Stainless Ltd ₹1,402 crore · Steel
1420. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd ₹1,400 crore · Telecom Services

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 5 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.