City Pulse Multiventures Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

City Pulse Multiventures Ltd trades at ₹2,898, in a confirmed uptrend and 142 weeks into that stage. That is +12.8% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 88% of a 52-week range of ₹1,188 to ₹3,137. On relative strength it has been ahead of the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view for 2 straight weeks.

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 142 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹2,898 it trades +12.8% versus its 200-day average and sits at 88% of its 52-week range (₹1,188–₹3,137).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 6.7 years the stock moved +9,543% while the NIFTY 500 moved +136% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock has been ahead for 2 straight weeks — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

City Pulse Multiventures Ltd trades at 2,154.0× P/E, at the pricey end of its own range (87th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 1,062.2×, measured across 6.7 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 2,154.0× is at the pricey end of its own range (87th percentile), against a long-run median of 1,062.2× measured over 6.7 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +800.0% against a +131.7% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

City Pulse Multiventures Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 8 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

4-Factor Sector Score

No sector-relative score — City Pulse Multiventures Ltd is not present in the sector comparison for Entertainment & Media.

The score is a rank WITHIN a peer set: every metric is scored by percentile against the other members. Without the peer set there is no score to state, so none is invented here.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

City Pulse Multiventures Ltd reported ₹1.5 Cr of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter, −8.1% year on year. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹2.8 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹4.0 Cr. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.

FY25 revenue came in at ₹2.8 Cr (+144.3% on the year). The latest quarter (Dec 25) printed ₹1.5 Cr, −8.1% year on year.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +20.1% over the last 4 quarters against +164.9%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over.

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

City Pulse Multiventures Ltd's operating margin is 81.1% in the Dec 25 quarter, +35.7 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 10 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −560.0% to 66.5%. The current quarter is running above every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 81.1%, +35.7 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 10 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −560.0%–66.5%, and FY25's 66.5% is the top of that band — a record year.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +35.7 pp year on year while gross margin went −0.4 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

City Pulse Multiventures Ltd earned ₹0.8 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, +29.3% year on year. It is the 3rd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹1.3 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 23.7%. That is 50.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹0.6 Cr.

Dec 25 profit was ₹0.8 Cr, +29.3% year on year — the 3rd consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY25 printed ₹1.3 Cr (+793.3%), and the 10-year compound rate is 23.7%.

Why profit moved: revenue contributed −8.1% and the margin +35.7 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +55.4% vs revenue +49.4%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 213% of City Pulse Multiventures Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was ₹4.5 Cr of operating cash against ₹1.3 Cr of profit. After ₹2.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹3.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of ₹4.5 Cr against reported profit of ₹1.3 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹3.0 Cr after ₹2.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 213% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

Why conversion sits at 213%: the cash cycle tightened 148 days between FY20 and FY25 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 2.0× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

City Pulse Multiventures Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 156 days in FY25, down from 304 days in FY20. Capital spending ran ₹2.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY25 sales of ₹2.8 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.0 Cr, so roughly ₹1.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY25: debtors at 156 days, inventory at 0 days — roughly 0.0 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 156 days, tighter than FY20's 304.

In money terms: at FY25 sales of ₹2.8 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.0 Cr — so the 156-day loop keeps roughly ₹1.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹2.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹1.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.6 Cr (FY25) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

City Pulse Multiventures Ltd earns a ROCE of 2% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −12% in FY15. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 47.7% net margin on 0.03× asset turns.

FY25 ROCE is 2%, recovered from a FY15 trough of −12% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 47.7% net margin × 0.03× asset turns × 1.06× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 1.5% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

City Pulse Multiventures Ltd carries ₹1.9 Cr of borrowings against ₹91.3 Cr of equity in FY25, a debt-to-equity of 0.02. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹2.1 Cr to ₹1.9 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹2.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY25: borrowings of ₹1.9 Cr against equity of ₹91.3 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.02. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹2.1 Cr to ₹1.9 Cr while capital spending ran ₹2.0 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Promoters cut 27.8 points of City Pulse Multiventures Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 12.0% of the company. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Promoters: −27.8 points over 8 quarters to 12.0%. Note the structure: promoters hold under 20% — this is a widely-held company where institutions, not a family, set the direction.

🚨 Why the register moved: promoters drove it (−27.8 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

City Pulse Multiventures Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions