Ashika Credit Capital share price

Ashika Credit Capital Ltd's share price was ₹399.30 at the close on 17 July 2026. It has been rising for 4 weeks. That is 5.3% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹313 and ₹432, and at that close it sat 73% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Ashika Credit Capital Ltd is in stage 2. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 2 weeks in a row.

Over the last 10 years the share price moved +1,238% while the NIFTY 500 moved +263%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

For January to March 2026 (the quarter ended 31 March 2026), Ashika Credit Capital reported total income of ₹50.0 crore, up 13.6% from ₹44.0 crore a year earlier, and a loss of ₹36.0 crore.

Ashika Credit Capital results: January to March 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for April to June 2026, are due by 14 August 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 31 March 2026). Income and profit in ₹ crore.

Ashika Credit Capital closed at ₹399.30 on 17 July 2026, up 2.7% from ₹388.65 a year earlier (18 July 2025) and up 706.7% over five years. Its highest weekly close since March 2016 was ₹902.30 on 10 January 2025.

Ashika Credit Capital share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 17 Jul 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

437 weekly closes from 14 March 2016 to 17 July 2026.

17 Jul 2026: Ashika Credit Capital closed at ₹399.30, up 0.0% on the week and up 0.0% on the month. Results for January to March 2026: Total income up 13.6% on a year earlier.

The NSE corporate-actions record has no dividend for Ashika Credit Capital since 1 April 2021, so this page cannot show amounts per share.

Yes. Ashika Credit Capital Ltd paid out 4% of its profit as dividends in FY26, and it paid a dividend in 1 of its last 6 reported years.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

Ashika Credit Capital is not on any of our India lists this week.

Ashika Credit Capital Ltd posted a net loss of ₹36.0 Cr in the Mar 2026 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹59.0 Cr. Over 20 years profit has grown 22.6% a year on average. That loss is 72.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹47.0 Cr.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

Ashika Credit Capital Ltd reported ₹50.0 Cr of income in the Mar 2026 quarter, +13.6% on the same quarter a year earlier. Over 20 years it has grown 8.4% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹240 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹186 Cr.

For a bank, revenue is everything it earns: interest on its loans plus fees and other income.

FY26 revenue was ₹240 Cr, +5,900.0% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +13.6% on average, against 8.4% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate.

Ashika Credit Capital Ltd's net margin was −72.0% in the Mar 2026 quarter, 34.8 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 6 years it has been between −1,275.0% and 61.1%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Net margin is what the bank keeps from every ₹100 of revenue after every cost, provision for bad loans and tax. It is the clearest single margin we can read for a lender.

Why: the net margin move is clear, but the cost details behind it are not in our data, so we show the move without guessing the reason.

Ashika Credit Capital Ltd does not report loan-quality figures this page can read, so this section says so rather than guess. No bad-loan figures are filed in a form this page can read, and none are guessed from the profit line. The income, margin and return sections carry what this business does report.

Gross NPA is the share of the loan book where repayments have stopped. Net NPA is what is left after the money the lender has already set aside for those loans. Falling is good; rising is a warning.

Why: loan quality drives a lender, but its details (new bad loans, recoveries, money set aside) are not in our data for this company. The sections around this one carry what we can back up.

Ashika Credit Capital Ltd's revenue was ₹240 Cr in FY26, +5,900.0% on the year before, so the loan book is growing. The latest quarter was +13.6% on a year earlier. The net margin on that income is −72.0%, +34.8 percentage points on a year ago.

We read the loan book through revenue: when the book grows, revenue grows with it. It is only a rough guide, because interest-rate changes and fee swings can move it a few points in any year.

Interest income stands in for the size of the loan book; changes in interest rates can move it a few points in any year.

In short: a lender grows well when its loan book grows, its margin stays steady and its loans stay clean. Gross NPA is the loan-quality figure this page uses.

Ashika Credit Capital Ltd's P/BV is 1.5×, in the middle of its own history: higher than 50% of past readings. Its usual P/BV (the middle reading) is 1.7×, over 1 year of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

For a bank or lender we compare the price with book value, the net worth on its balance sheet. P/BV is how many rupees the market pays for each ₹1 of that net worth. Below 1× means the market values it at less than its net worth.

Why the multiple is low: this lender earns about 7% a year on its equity. A lender that earns less on its net worth is valued lower for each rupee of it, and that gap usually closes only if returns improve.

In short: the multiple is about average against its own past, so the book value trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source has, is not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 94% on reported income across 5 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Ashika Credit Capital Ltd's business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 4 quarters of 1 measure, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Ashika Credit Capital Ltd earned a return on equity of 7% in FY26. Its lowest yearly reading on file was −20% in FY25. For a lender the balance sheet is the business, so the return on equity and on assets have to be read together.

Two numbers rate a bank: ROE, what it earns on shareholders’ money, and ROA, what it earns on all its assets. An ROE above about 13 to 15% is healthy; below that, net worth grows slowly.

Return on assets is left out here, because its two sources disagree for this quarter. That return is below the level a bank needs to grow its net worth quickly, which helps explain why its multiple is where it is.

Why ROE moved: profit grew 22.6% a year over 20 years while net worth grew more slowly. When earnings recover faster than net worth builds up, ROE climbs off its low.

The quarterly return-on-equity and return-on-assets curves, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 94% on reported income across 5 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

For a bank, borrowing is the raw material of the business, not a warning sign: it borrows money in order to lend it out. Its safety is read through its returns and its loans. Its safety is read from the bad-loan figures and the return on equity instead.

For a manufacturer, debt is a claim on its profits. For a lender it is the stock it trades in, so the usual debt-to-equity test would mislead and is not used here.

Promoters raised their stake in Ashika Credit Capital Ltd by 10.9 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Promoters now own 74.3% of the company. Domestic institutions moved +0.4 points over the same period, to 0.4%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Promoters: +10.9 points over 8 quarters, to 74.3%; Domestic institutions: +0.4 points over 8 quarters, to 0.4%; Foreign institutions: −0.1 points over 8 quarters, to 1.4%.

Why the owners changed: promoters drove it (+10.9 points). They raised their stake step by step.

For Ashika Credit Capital Ltd, the Z-score is not used, because it was built for manufacturers, not lenders. For a lender, safety is read from its capital and bad-loan figures instead.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

50.8 out of 100, rank 3 of 3 in Finance - Investment Bankers, with 34% of the evidence available. It is provisional, so it is ranked below companies with full evidence.

Ashika Credit Capital Ltd scores 50.8 out of 100 against the 3 companies it is compared with in Finance - Investment Bankers, ranking 3. Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose.

The three scored parts add up to the total exactly: 23.4 + 16.7 + 10.7 = 50.8 (no relative-strength reading this week; its 20 points are shared across the other three). This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if ROA turns down or gross NPA rises while the share price lags its sector.

Ashika Credit Capital ranks 3 of 3 Finance - Investment Bankers companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 50.8 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. Financial companies use P/BV÷ROE and asset quality; PEG, industrial OPM and ROCE are excluded. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Jun 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Finance - Investment Bankers, all 3 compared on one page.

Ashika Credit Capital is the 2nd largest of 3 Finance - Investment Bankers companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: JM Financial. Just below it: Dam Capital Advisors.

Finance - Investment Bankers companies close in size

1. JM Financial Ltd ₹10,315 crore
2. Ashika Credit Capital Ltd ₹2,952 crore
3. Dam Capital Advisors Ltd ₹905 crore

All 3 Finance - Investment Bankers companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

1053. Moschip Technologies Ltd ₹2,970 crore · IT - Software
1054. Indostar Capital Finance Ltd ₹2,960 crore · Finance & Investments - CV Finance
1055. Ashika Credit Capital Ltd ₹2,952 crore
1056. Advanced Enzyme Technologies Ltd ₹2,951 crore · Seeds/Tissue Culture/Bio Technology
1057. Axis Solutions Ltd ₹2,947 crore · Engineering - Light - General

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 17 July 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.