Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-20
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Building Material USA Stocks in India

Building Material USA: Carysil Ltd owns the largest revenue base AND the fastest current growth.

01 · the index people search for

Nifty Building Material USA Index — Constituents & Performance

All 2 listed Indian Building Material USA companies are named here, largest first — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Building Material USA index. Every figure on this page is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.

  1. Carysil Ltd₹3.4K Cr
  2. Pokarna Ltd₹3.0K Cr
02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Building Material USA outperforming NIFTY 500?

Building Material USA has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 23.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 17.1%. 2 of 2 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Carysil Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +5.5%. Readings are as of 2026-08-09.

+17.1%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
+23.7%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
2/2Stocks leading NIFTY 500
1/2Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: 14.9 as of 2026-08-09 · BROADENING · falling.

The central tension: current leadership is concentrated, so durability matters more than rank.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Building Material USA has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 23.7% over 52 weeks and 17.1% over 13 weeks. 2 of 2 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 2 beat the sector itself. Carysil Ltd leads with revenue of ₹960 crore, based on 2 of 2 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Companies
2
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹6.3K Cr
Carysil Ltd
Revenue growing
1/2
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
2/2
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 2 of 2
03 · research priority, made explicit

Best Building Material USA Stocks in India (Aug 2026), Ranked by Data

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Carysil Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 97% evidence confidence.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

Top 10 Building Material USA Stocks in India

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Carysil LtdCARYSIL 78.7/100Favorable setup97% evidence LEADER 30.2/35 Revenue 14.2% · PAT 48.6% · OPM change 1 pp 100% evidence 17.4/25 ROCE 17.8% · OPM 20% 100% evidence 13.5/20 P/E 31.2× · PEG 0.64 85% evidence 17.6/20 RS sector 5.5% · RS bench 20.7% · 1Y 50.8%12 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 30.2 + 17.4 + 13.5 + 17.6 = 78.7 · Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2Pokarna LtdPOKARNA 41.4/100Mixed-negative evidence97% evidence TURNING 10.0/35 Revenue -35.2% · PAT -48.1% · OPM change 4 pp 100% evidence 12.0/25 ROCE 11.5% · OPM 36% 100% evidence 11.8/20 P/E 31.1× · PEG 0.78 85% evidence 7.6/20 RS sector -8.2% · RS bench 5.5% · 1Y 6%6 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 10 + 12 + 11.8 + 7.6 = 41.4 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
04 · what price has already done

Market action

Carysil Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Building Material USA at +50.8%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +20.7%. 2 of 2 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-08-14.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · the story behind the numbers

Building Material USA — the story behind the numbers

This is the written read behind the Building Material USA figures above — what is actually happening in the sector, in words, with the evidence each claim rests on. It is dated 19 Apr 2026, so the words are older than the numbers. 3 themes are live here, 1 of them rated high severity.

The sector is at a pivot point where the easing of US trade tensions (tariffs) is expected to restore realizations. While CARYSIL is better positioned due to its domestic growth and IKEA partnership, POKARNA offers a high-beta play on capacity expansion and operating leverage, provided regulatory health concerns are managed.

The US Building Materials sector (Quartz and Kitchen Surfaces) is navigating a period of significant transition as of Q3 FY26. Performance is sharply bifurcated: CARYSIL managed an 8.6% YoY revenue increase to ₹225.2 Cr, while POKARNA saw a 39.64% YoY decline to ₹134.96 Cr. The primary driver of this divergence is the exposure to US trade policy.

How old this read is: STALE — this read comes from our Building Material USA sector brief dated 19 Apr 2026, about 4 months ago. The page says so rather than dressing it up, and a fresh sector dive replaces it the day it runs.

What is live in this sector right now

Live themeSeverityEvidence on file
Health risk investigations (Silicosis) and international certification standards (BIS, lead-free faucets).Named for CARYSIL, POKARNAhigh“We're kind of putting a lot of effort on R&D technology to try to match all the certification water standards.” Investing in R&D and PVD technology to match global certification standards.
US tariff uncertainties and export-heavy models expose both firms to global trade barriers.Named for CARYSIL, POKARNAmedium“To navigate the earlier tariff impact, the Company had extended additional discounts to our key US customers.” Rollback of discounts following tariff reductions and diversification into non-US markets.
Volatility in MMA prices, though currently favorable at $1.5.Named for CARYSILlow“MMA prices have gone down from $2.02 in April to $1.5 in December.” 3-month forecasting and order placement based on current price ranges.

Sources: our Building Material USA sector brief, 19 Apr 2026 · company earnings-call transcripts.

06 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Carysil Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 2 Building Material USA companies compared here, at ₹960 crore. Pokarna Ltd is next at ₹589 crore. The same company also holds the highest Revenue growth, at 14.2%. 2 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026. Its Revenue series carries 20 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Carysil Ltd is the scale leader at ₹960 crore, 63% ahead of Pokarna Ltd. Carysil Ltd's growth is 14.2% from a ₹960 crore base, with 20 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderCarysil Ltd · ₹960 crore
Gap63% versus #2 · Pokarna Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/2 companies · 40 observations

Investor read: Carysil Ltd is the scale benchmark; Carysil Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Carysil Ltd's growth falls below Carysil Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Carysil Ltd CARYSIL₹960 Cr
2Pokarna Ltd POKARNA₹589 Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Carysil Ltd CARYSIL14%
2Pokarna Ltd POKARNA-35%
Revenue · company comparison
2/2 level · 2/2 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Carysil Ltd CARYSIL₹262 Cr15%Jun 2026
Pokarna Ltd POKARNA₹189 Cr11%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Carysil Ltd · CARYSIL

₹119 Cr
₹128 Cr
₹139 Cr
₹171 Cr
₹139 Cr
₹138 Cr
₹146 Cr
₹142 Cr
₹164 Cr
₹188 Cr
₹191 Cr
₹201 Cr
₹207 Cr
₹203 Cr
₹204 Cr
₹227 Cr
₹241 Cr
₹223 Cr
₹234 Cr
₹262 Cr

Pokarna Ltd · POKARNA

₹148 Cr
₹192 Cr
₹204 Cr
₹240 Cr
₹213 Cr
₹113 Cr
₹161 Cr
₹162 Cr
₹200 Cr
₹165 Cr
₹162 Cr
₹193 Cr
₹251 Cr
₹224 Cr
₹263 Cr
₹171 Cr
₹118 Cr
₹135 Cr
₹147 Cr
₹189 Cr

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Carysil Ltd · CARYSIL

—
—
—
74%
17%
7.8%
5.0%
-17%
18%
36%
31%
42%
26%
8.0%
6.8%
13%
16%
9.9%
15%
15%

Pokarna Ltd · POKARNA

—
—
—
129%
44%
-41%
-21%
-33%
-6.1%
46%
0.6%
19%
26%
36%
62%
-11%
-53%
-40%
-44%
11%
07 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Pokarna Ltd has the highest OPM among the 2 Building Material USA companies compared here, at 36%. Carysil Ltd is next at 20%. The same company also holds the highest Margin change, at +4 percentage points. 2 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026. Its OPM series carries 20 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Pokarna Ltd leads both opm at 36% and margin change at +4 percentage points.

LeaderPokarna Ltd · 36%
Gap80% versus #2 · Carysil Ltd
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/2 companies · 40 observations

Investor read: Pokarna Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Pokarna Ltd POKARNA36%
2Carysil Ltd CARYSIL20%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Pokarna Ltd POKARNA+4.0 pp
2Carysil Ltd CARYSIL+1.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
2/2 level · 2/2 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Pokarna Ltd POKARNA36%+4.0 ppJun 2026
Carysil Ltd CARYSIL20%+1.0 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Carysil Ltd · CARYSIL

22%
22%
20%
20%
16%
18%
18%
18%
20%
19%
18%
18%
18%
14%
17%
19%
19%
19%
19%
20%

Pokarna Ltd · POKARNA

30%
32%
22%
25%
25%
23%
20%
29%
34%
32%
25%
32%
34%
35%
38%
32%
20%
30%
31%
36%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Carysil Ltd · CARYSIL

+1.2 pp
−1.3 pp
+0.1 pp
−2.1 pp
−5.6 pp
−3.8 pp
−2.3 pp
−1.7 pp
+3.9 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−5.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+5.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp

Pokarna Ltd · POKARNA

−10.5 pp
−1.4 pp
+2.0 pp
+3.8 pp
−5.6 pp
−9.0 pp
−2.2 pp
+3.8 pp
+9.3 pp
+9.0 pp
+5.0 pp
+3.0 pp
0.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+13.0 pp
0.0 pp
−14.0 pp
−5.0 pp
−7.0 pp
+4.0 pp
08 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Carysil Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 2 Building Material USA companies compared here, at ₹107 crore. Pokarna Ltd is next at ₹95 crore. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at 48.6%. 2 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Carysil Ltd leads with ₹107 crore of TTM profit, 12.6% above Pokarna Ltd. Carysil Ltd shows 48.6% growth from a ₹107 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderCarysil Ltd · ₹107 crore
Gap12.6% versus #2 · Pokarna Ltd
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/2 companies · 40 observations

Investor read: Carysil Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Carysil Ltd CARYSIL₹107 Cr
2Pokarna Ltd POKARNA₹95 Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1Carysil Ltd CARYSIL49%
2Pokarna Ltd POKARNA-48%
Net profit · company comparison
2/2 level · 2/2 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Pokarna Ltd POKARNA₹43 Cr54%Jun 2026
Carysil Ltd CARYSIL₹32 Cr39%Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Carysil Ltd · CARYSIL

₹18 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹9 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹32 Cr

Pokarna Ltd · POKARNA

₹20 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹45 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹59 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹6 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹26 Cr
₹43 Cr

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Carysil Ltd · CARYSIL

—
—
—
46%
-50%
-29%
-25%
-37%
78%
25%
33%
33%
6.3%
-13%
19%
44%
59%
62%
42%
39%

Pokarna Ltd · POKARNA

—
—
—
600%
20%
-91%
-45%
-36%
38%
600%
45%
83%
36%
143%
269%
-15%
-87%
-61%
-56%
54%
09 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Carysil Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 2 Building Material USA companies compared here, at 17.8%. Pokarna Ltd is next at 11.5%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +4.4 percentage points. 2 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026. Its ROCE series carries 15 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Carysil Ltd leads ROCE at 17.8%, 6.3 percentage points above Pokarna Ltd. Carysil Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +4.4 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderCarysil Ltd · 17.8%
Gap54.8% versus #2 · Pokarna Ltd
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/2 companies · 29 observations

Investor read: Carysil Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Carysil Ltd CARYSIL18%
2Pokarna Ltd POKARNA12%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Carysil Ltd CARYSIL+4.4 pp
2Pokarna Ltd POKARNA−16.2 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
2/2 level · 2/2 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Carysil Ltd CARYSIL20%+4.4 ppJun 2026
Pokarna Ltd POKARNA9.0%−16.2 ppJun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Carysil Ltd · CARYSIL

28%
—
28%
—
24%
—
21%
—
20%
24%
20%
25%
17%
21%
16%
21%
18%
22%
20%
—

Pokarna Ltd · POKARNA

11%
—
16%
—
20%
—
—
—
12%
18%
19%
20%
16%
25%
25%
28%
19%
18%
9.0%
—

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Carysil Ltd · CARYSIL

—
—
—
—
−4.4 pp
—
−6.7 pp
—
−3.6 pp
—
−1.1 pp
—
−2.7 pp
−2.7 pp
−3.9 pp
−3.9 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+4.4 pp
—

Pokarna Ltd · POKARNA

—
—
—
—
+9.2 pp
—
—
—
−8.2 pp
—
—
—
+4.4 pp
+6.5 pp
+6.7 pp
+7.2 pp
+3.2 pp
−6.9 pp
−16.2 pp
—
10 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Carysil Ltd has the lowest PEG among the 2 Building Material USA companies compared here, at 0.64×. Pokarna Ltd is next at 0.78×. Pokarna Ltd has the lowest P/E at 31.1×, so level and change sit with different companies. 2 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Carysil Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.64×, 17.9% below Pokarna Ltd. Only 2 of 2 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderCarysil Ltd · 0.64×
Gap17.9% versus #2 · Pokarna Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/2 companies · 16 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
1Carysil Ltd CARYSIL0.6
2Pokarna Ltd POKARNA0.8
P/Elowest P/E
1Pokarna Ltd POKARNA31.1
2Carysil Ltd CARYSIL31.2
Valuation · company comparison
2/2 level · 2/2 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Pokarna Ltd POKARNA0.841.8Jun 2026
Carysil Ltd CARYSIL0.633.8Jun 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Carysil Ltd · CARYSIL

—
—
1.4
—
0.5
2.2
—
—
—
—
—
3.8
0.9
1.5
3.7
7.1
4.5
1.4
0.6
0.6

Pokarna Ltd · POKARNA

1.0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.1
0.7
—
—
—
—
—
0.8
—
—

P/E · reported quarter history

Carysil Ltd · CARYSIL

44.9
38.9
34.6
23.0
23.3
20.3
25.8
36.0
36.6
42.8
48.0
39.0
34.8
32.8
28.4
38.2
32.5
30.6
24.8
33.8

Pokarna Ltd · POKARNA

35.3
53.4
35.7
16.9
14.3
11.2
10.1
17.3
26.0
22.9
15.5
24.1
30.6
29.3
27.4
16.7
13.4
17.7
24.2
41.8
11 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Building Material USA comparison names 4 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 2 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
12 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 2 Building Material USA companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-14. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-14 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing2 cross-checked · 0 unverified · 0 withheld, of 2 graded companies.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees

A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.

13 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Building Material USA company comparison FAQs

These 23 answers restate the Building Material USA comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 2 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-14. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Building Material USA sector outperforming NIFTY 500?

Building Material USA has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 23.7% over 52 weeks and 17.1% over 13 weeks. 2 of 2 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 2 beat the sector itself.

Which Building Material USA company is largest by revenue?

Carysil Ltd leads with revenue of ₹960 crore, based on 2 of 2 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Which Building Material USA company is growing fastest?

Carysil Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 14.2%, across 2 of 2 comparable companies.

Which Building Material USA company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Carysil Ltd ranks first at 78.7/100 with 97% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Building Material USA company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Carysil Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.64, among 2 of 2 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Building Material USA comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Is there a Nifty Building Material USA index?

NSE India maintains Nifty indices for several broad sector categories — Nifty Bank, Nifty IT, Nifty Pharma and others — but not for every sub-sector grouping on this site. Whether or not an official Nifty index covers Building Material USA, this page builds its own equal-weight basket of 2 listed Building Material USA companies — one company, one vote, regardless of market value — so no single large company dominates the reading. Figures are as of Jun 2026.

Which are the best Building Material USA stocks in India?

Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Carysil Ltd places first among 2 listed Building Material USA companies, followed by Pokarna Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.

How many Building Material USA stocks are listed in India?

This comparison covers 2 listed Building Material USA companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.

Which Building Material USA company is the biggest?

Carysil Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹960 crore, ahead of Pokarna Ltd at ₹589 crore. That covers 2 of 2 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.

Which Building Material USA company has the best profit margins?

Pokarna Ltd has the highest operating margin at 36%, from 2 of 2 comparable companies. Pokarna Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +4 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Building Material USA company makes the most profit?

Carysil Ltd earns the most, at ₹107 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 2 of 2 comparable companies. Carysil Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 48.6%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Building Material USA company earns the highest return on capital?

Carysil Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 17.8%, across 2 of 2 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Building Material USA stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Carysil Ltd screens cheapest at 0.64×. All 2 companies qualify for the ratio comparison. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Building Material USA sector beating the market?

Building Material USA has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 23.7% over the last 52 weeks and 17.1% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 2 of 2 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Building Material USA stock has the strongest price momentum?

Carysil Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Building Material USA company scores highest for research priority?

Carysil Ltd scores 78.7 out of 100 with 97% evidence confidence, from 30.2 points on growth and earnings, 17.4 on capital efficiency, 13.5 on valuation and 17.6 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Building Material USA companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 2 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Building Material USA sector?

The 2 Building Material USA companies on this page carry ₹6,309 crore of combined market value. Carysil Ltd is the largest at ₹3,356 crore, about 53% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-20.

How is the Building Material USA sector performing?

2 of the 2 covered Building Material USA companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 23.7% ahead of NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-20.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI