# Building Material USA — company-by-company sector analysis

> Building Material USA: Carysil Ltd owns the largest revenue base AND the fastest current growth.

Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers. Data as of 2026-08-20. Not investment advice.

## Bottom line

Building Material USA has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 23.7% over 52 weeks and 17.1% over 13 weeks. 2 of 2 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 2 beat the sector itself. Carysil Ltd leads with revenue of ₹960 crore, based on 2 of 2 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

## Sector relative strength

Building Material USA has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 23.7% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 17.1%. 2 of 2 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Carysil Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +5.5%. Readings are as of 2026-08-09.

13-week sector return versus NIFTY 500: 17%
52-week sector return versus NIFTY 500: 24%
Stocks leading NIFTY: 2/2
Stocks leading sector: 1/2

Central tension: The central tension: current leadership is concentrated, so durability matters more than rank.

Companies: 2
Combined market value: ₹6.3K Cr

## 4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

1. Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL): 79/100 — Favorable setup; evidence 97%
   - Growth & earnings 30.2/35 | Capital efficiency 17.4/25 | Valuation 13.5/20 | Relative strength 17.6/20
   - Price stage: LEADER — Ahead of the benchmark 13 weeks or more running, and ahead over the past year.
   - Led NIFTY 500 by 5%+ over the prior 13 weeks in 12 of the last 12 weeks
   - Exact sum: 30.2 + 17.4 + 13.5 + 17.6 = 78.7
   - Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
2. Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA): 41/100 — Mixed-negative evidence; evidence 97%
   - Growth & earnings 10.0/35 | Capital efficiency 12.0/25 | Valuation 11.8/20 | Relative strength 7.6/20
   - Price stage: TURNING — Ahead of the benchmark for one to four weeks, after a stretch of being behind.
   - Led NIFTY 500 by 5%+ over the prior 13 weeks in 6 of the last 12 weeks
   - Exact sum: 10 + 12 + 11.8 + 7.6 = 41.4
   - Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

## Market action

Carysil Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Building Material USA at +50.8%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +20.7%. 2 of 2 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-08-14.

### Strongest one-year price performers
1. Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL): 51%
2. Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA): 6.0%

### Strongest relative strength versus NIFTY 500
1. Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL): 21%
2. Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA): 5.5%

## Building Material USA — the story behind the numbers

This is the written read behind the Building Material USA figures above — what is actually happening in the sector, in words, with the evidence each claim rests on. It is dated 19 Apr 2026, so the words are older than the numbers. 3 themes are live here, 1 of them rated high severity.

The sector is at a pivot point where the easing of US trade tensions (tariffs) is expected to restore realizations. While CARYSIL is better positioned due to its domestic growth and IKEA partnership, POKARNA offers a high-beta play on capacity expansion and operating leverage, provided regulatory health concerns are managed.

The US Building Materials sector (Quartz and Kitchen Surfaces) is navigating a period of significant transition as of Q3 FY26. Performance is sharply bifurcated: CARYSIL managed an 8.6% YoY revenue increase to ₹225.2 Cr, while POKARNA saw a 39.64% YoY decline to ₹134.96 Cr. The primary driver of this divergence is the exposure to US trade policy.

How old this read is: STALE — this read comes from our Building Material USA sector brief dated 19 Apr 2026, about 4 months ago. The page says so rather than dressing it up, and a fresh sector dive replaces it the day it runs.

### Live themes, worst first
- HIGH | Health risk investigations (Silicosis) and international certification standards (BIS, lead-free faucets). | Investing in R&D and PVD technology to match global certification standards. | quoted: "We're kind of putting a lot of effort on R&D technology to try to match all the certification water standards." | named for CARYSIL, POKARNA
- MEDIUM | US tariff uncertainties and export-heavy models expose both firms to global trade barriers. | Rollback of discounts following tariff reductions and diversification into non-US markets. | quoted: "To navigate the earlier tariff impact, the Company had extended additional discounts to our key US customers." | named for CARYSIL, POKARNA
- LOW | Volatility in MMA prices, though currently favorable at $1.5. | 3-month forecasting and order placement based on current price ranges. | quoted: "MMA prices have gone down from $2.02 in April to $1.5 in December." | named for CARYSIL

Sources: our Building Material USA sector brief, 19 Apr 2026 · company earnings-call transcripts.

## Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

What the numbers say: Carysil Ltd is the scale leader at ₹960 crore, 63% ahead of Pokarna Ltd. Carysil Ltd's growth is 14.2% from a ₹960 crore base, with 20 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

Investor read: Carysil Ltd is the scale benchmark; Carysil Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Carysil Ltd's growth falls below Carysil Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Evidence: Carysil Ltd · ₹960 crore | 63% versus #2 · Pokarna Ltd | 8/8 recent comparable periods | 2/2 companies · 40 observations

Definition: Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.

### Revenue — largest
1. Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL): ₹960 Cr
2. Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA): ₹589 Cr

### Revenue growth — fastest growers
1. Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL): 14%
2. Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA): -35%

### 20-quarter Revenue history
- CARYSIL: Sep 2021 ₹119 Cr | Dec 2021 ₹128 Cr | Mar 2022 ₹139 Cr | Jun 2022 ₹171 Cr | Sep 2022 ₹139 Cr | Dec 2022 ₹138 Cr | Mar 2023 ₹146 Cr | Jun 2023 ₹142 Cr | Sep 2023 ₹164 Cr | Dec 2023 ₹188 Cr | Mar 2024 ₹191 Cr | Jun 2024 ₹201 Cr | Sep 2024 ₹207 Cr | Dec 2024 ₹203 Cr | Mar 2025 ₹204 Cr | Jun 2025 ₹227 Cr | Sep 2025 ₹241 Cr | Dec 2025 ₹223 Cr | Mar 2026 ₹234 Cr | Jun 2026 ₹262 Cr
- POKARNA: Sep 2021 ₹148 Cr | Dec 2021 ₹192 Cr | Mar 2022 ₹204 Cr | Jun 2022 ₹240 Cr | Sep 2022 ₹213 Cr | Dec 2022 ₹113 Cr | Mar 2023 ₹161 Cr | Jun 2023 ₹162 Cr | Sep 2023 ₹200 Cr | Dec 2023 ₹165 Cr | Mar 2024 ₹162 Cr | Jun 2024 ₹193 Cr | Sep 2024 ₹251 Cr | Dec 2024 ₹224 Cr | Mar 2025 ₹263 Cr | Jun 2025 ₹171 Cr | Sep 2025 ₹118 Cr | Dec 2025 ₹135 Cr | Mar 2026 ₹147 Cr | Jun 2026 ₹189 Cr

### 20-quarter Revenue growth history
- CARYSIL: Sep 2021 — | Dec 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Jun 2022 74% | Sep 2022 17% | Dec 2022 7.8% | Mar 2023 5.0% | Jun 2023 -17% | Sep 2023 18% | Dec 2023 36% | Mar 2024 31% | Jun 2024 42% | Sep 2024 26% | Dec 2024 8.0% | Mar 2025 6.8% | Jun 2025 13% | Sep 2025 16% | Dec 2025 9.9% | Mar 2026 15% | Jun 2026 15%
- POKARNA: Sep 2021 — | Dec 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Jun 2022 129% | Sep 2022 44% | Dec 2022 -41% | Mar 2023 -21% | Jun 2023 -33% | Sep 2023 -6.1% | Dec 2023 46% | Mar 2024 0.6% | Jun 2024 19% | Sep 2024 26% | Dec 2024 36% | Mar 2025 62% | Jun 2025 -11% | Sep 2025 -53% | Dec 2025 -40% | Mar 2026 -44% | Jun 2026 11%

## Operating Economics & Margin Trend

What the numbers say: Pokarna Ltd leads both opm at 36% and margin change at +4 percentage points.

Investor read: Pokarna Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Evidence: Pokarna Ltd · 36% | 80% versus #2 · Carysil Ltd | 3/8 recent comparable periods | 2/2 companies · 40 observations

Definition: Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.

### OPM — highest
1. Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA): 36%
2. Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL): 20%

### Margin change — fastest expanders
1. Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA): +4.0 pp
2. Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL): +1.0 pp

### 20-quarter OPM history
- CARYSIL: Sep 2021 22% | Dec 2021 22% | Mar 2022 20% | Jun 2022 20% | Sep 2022 16% | Dec 2022 18% | Mar 2023 18% | Jun 2023 18% | Sep 2023 20% | Dec 2023 19% | Mar 2024 18% | Jun 2024 18% | Sep 2024 18% | Dec 2024 14% | Mar 2025 17% | Jun 2025 19% | Sep 2025 19% | Dec 2025 19% | Mar 2026 19% | Jun 2026 20%
- POKARNA: Sep 2021 30% | Dec 2021 32% | Mar 2022 22% | Jun 2022 25% | Sep 2022 25% | Dec 2022 23% | Mar 2023 20% | Jun 2023 29% | Sep 2023 34% | Dec 2023 32% | Mar 2024 25% | Jun 2024 32% | Sep 2024 34% | Dec 2024 35% | Mar 2025 38% | Jun 2025 32% | Sep 2025 20% | Dec 2025 30% | Mar 2026 31% | Jun 2026 36%

### 20-quarter Margin change history
- CARYSIL: Sep 2021 +1.2 pp | Dec 2021 −1.3 pp | Mar 2022 +0.1 pp | Jun 2022 −2.1 pp | Sep 2022 −5.6 pp | Dec 2022 −3.8 pp | Mar 2023 −2.3 pp | Jun 2023 −1.7 pp | Sep 2023 +3.9 pp | Dec 2023 +1.0 pp | Mar 2024 0.0 pp | Jun 2024 0.0 pp | Sep 2024 −2.0 pp | Dec 2024 −5.0 pp | Mar 2025 −1.0 pp | Jun 2025 +1.0 pp | Sep 2025 +1.0 pp | Dec 2025 +5.0 pp | Mar 2026 +2.0 pp | Jun 2026 +1.0 pp
- POKARNA: Sep 2021 −10.5 pp | Dec 2021 −1.4 pp | Mar 2022 +2.0 pp | Jun 2022 +3.8 pp | Sep 2022 −5.6 pp | Dec 2022 −9.0 pp | Mar 2023 −2.2 pp | Jun 2023 +3.8 pp | Sep 2023 +9.3 pp | Dec 2023 +9.0 pp | Mar 2024 +5.0 pp | Jun 2024 +3.0 pp | Sep 2024 0.0 pp | Dec 2024 +3.0 pp | Mar 2025 +13.0 pp | Jun 2025 0.0 pp | Sep 2025 −14.0 pp | Dec 2025 −5.0 pp | Mar 2026 −7.0 pp | Jun 2026 +4.0 pp

## Profit Scale & Acceleration

What the numbers say: Carysil Ltd leads with ₹107 crore of TTM profit, 12.6% above Pokarna Ltd. Carysil Ltd shows 48.6% growth from a ₹107 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

Investor read: Carysil Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Evidence: Carysil Ltd · ₹107 crore | 12.6% versus #2 · Pokarna Ltd | 7/8 recent comparable periods | 2/2 companies · 40 observations

Definition: Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.

### Net profit — largest
1. Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL): ₹107 Cr
2. Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA): ₹95 Cr

### Profit growth — fastest growers
1. Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL): 49%
2. Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA): -48%

### 20-quarter Net profit history
- CARYSIL: Sep 2021 ₹18 Cr | Dec 2021 ₹17 Cr | Mar 2022 ₹16 Cr | Jun 2022 ₹19 Cr | Sep 2022 ₹9 Cr | Dec 2022 ₹12 Cr | Mar 2023 ₹12 Cr | Jun 2023 ₹12 Cr | Sep 2023 ₹16 Cr | Dec 2023 ₹15 Cr | Mar 2024 ₹16 Cr | Jun 2024 ₹16 Cr | Sep 2024 ₹17 Cr | Dec 2024 ₹13 Cr | Mar 2025 ₹19 Cr | Jun 2025 ₹23 Cr | Sep 2025 ₹27 Cr | Dec 2025 ₹21 Cr | Mar 2026 ₹27 Cr | Jun 2026 ₹32 Cr
- POKARNA: Sep 2021 ₹20 Cr | Dec 2021 ₹34 Cr | Mar 2022 ₹20 Cr | Jun 2022 ₹28 Cr | Sep 2022 ₹24 Cr | Dec 2022 ₹3 Cr | Mar 2023 ₹11 Cr | Jun 2023 ₹18 Cr | Sep 2023 ₹33 Cr | Dec 2023 ₹21 Cr | Mar 2024 ₹16 Cr | Jun 2024 ₹33 Cr | Sep 2024 ₹45 Cr | Dec 2024 ₹51 Cr | Mar 2025 ₹59 Cr | Jun 2025 ₹28 Cr | Sep 2025 ₹6 Cr | Dec 2025 ₹20 Cr | Mar 2026 ₹26 Cr | Jun 2026 ₹43 Cr

### 20-quarter Profit growth history
- CARYSIL: Sep 2021 — | Dec 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Jun 2022 46% | Sep 2022 -50% | Dec 2022 -29% | Mar 2023 -25% | Jun 2023 -37% | Sep 2023 78% | Dec 2023 25% | Mar 2024 33% | Jun 2024 33% | Sep 2024 6.3% | Dec 2024 -13% | Mar 2025 19% | Jun 2025 44% | Sep 2025 59% | Dec 2025 62% | Mar 2026 42% | Jun 2026 39%
- POKARNA: Sep 2021 — | Dec 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Jun 2022 600% | Sep 2022 20% | Dec 2022 -91% | Mar 2023 -45% | Jun 2023 -36% | Sep 2023 38% | Dec 2023 600% | Mar 2024 45% | Jun 2024 83% | Sep 2024 36% | Dec 2024 143% | Mar 2025 269% | Jun 2025 -15% | Sep 2025 -87% | Dec 2025 -61% | Mar 2026 -56% | Jun 2026 54%

## Return On Capital Employed

What the numbers say: Carysil Ltd leads ROCE at 17.8%, 6.3 percentage points above Pokarna Ltd. Carysil Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +4.4 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

Investor read: Carysil Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

Evidence: Carysil Ltd · 17.8% | 54.8% versus #2 · Pokarna Ltd | 3/8 recent comparable periods | 2/2 companies · 29 observations

Definition: ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.

### ROCE — highest
1. Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL): 18%
2. Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA): 12%

### ROCE change — fastest improvers
1. Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL): +4.4 pp
2. Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA): −16.2 pp

### 20-quarter ROCE history
- CARYSIL: Sep 2021 28% | Dec 2021 — | Mar 2022 28% | Jun 2022 — | Sep 2022 24% | Dec 2022 — | Mar 2023 21% | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 20% | Dec 2023 24% | Mar 2024 20% | Jun 2024 25% | Sep 2024 17% | Dec 2024 21% | Mar 2025 16% | Jun 2025 21% | Sep 2025 18% | Dec 2025 22% | Mar 2026 20% | Jun 2026 —
- POKARNA: Sep 2021 11% | Dec 2021 — | Mar 2022 16% | Jun 2022 — | Sep 2022 20% | Dec 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 12% | Dec 2023 18% | Mar 2024 19% | Jun 2024 20% | Sep 2024 16% | Dec 2024 25% | Mar 2025 25% | Jun 2025 28% | Sep 2025 19% | Dec 2025 18% | Mar 2026 9.0% | Jun 2026 —

### 20-quarter ROCE change history
- CARYSIL: Sep 2021 — | Dec 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Jun 2022 — | Sep 2022 −4.4 pp | Dec 2022 — | Mar 2023 −6.7 pp | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 −3.6 pp | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 −1.1 pp | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 −2.7 pp | Dec 2024 −2.7 pp | Mar 2025 −3.9 pp | Jun 2025 −3.9 pp | Sep 2025 +0.3 pp | Dec 2025 +0.4 pp | Mar 2026 +4.4 pp | Jun 2026 —
- POKARNA: Sep 2021 — | Dec 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Jun 2022 — | Sep 2022 +9.2 pp | Dec 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 −8.2 pp | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 — | Sep 2024 +4.4 pp | Dec 2024 +6.5 pp | Mar 2025 +6.7 pp | Jun 2025 +7.2 pp | Sep 2025 +3.2 pp | Dec 2025 −6.9 pp | Mar 2026 −16.2 pp | Jun 2026 —

## Valuation Against Growth & Quality

What the numbers say: Carysil Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.64×, 17.9% below Pokarna Ltd. Only 2 of 2 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

Evidence: Carysil Ltd · 0.64× | 17.9% versus #2 · Pokarna Ltd | 0/8 recent comparable periods | 2/2 companies · 16 observations

Definition: PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.

### PEG — lowest PEG
1. Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL): 0.6
2. Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA): 0.8

### P/E — lowest P/E
1. Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA): 31.1
2. Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL): 31.2

### 20-quarter PEG history
- CARYSIL: Sep 2021 — | Dec 2021 — | Mar 2022 1.4 | Jun 2022 — | Sep 2022 0.5 | Dec 2022 2.2 | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 — | Jun 2024 3.8 | Sep 2024 0.9 | Dec 2024 1.5 | Mar 2025 3.7 | Jun 2025 7.1 | Sep 2025 4.5 | Dec 2025 1.4 | Mar 2026 0.6 | Jun 2026 0.6
- POKARNA: Sep 2021 1.0 | Dec 2021 — | Mar 2022 — | Jun 2022 — | Sep 2022 — | Dec 2022 — | Mar 2023 — | Jun 2023 — | Sep 2023 — | Dec 2023 — | Mar 2024 1.1 | Jun 2024 0.7 | Sep 2024 — | Dec 2024 — | Mar 2025 — | Jun 2025 — | Sep 2025 — | Dec 2025 0.8 | Mar 2026 — | Jun 2026 —

### 20-quarter P/E history
- CARYSIL: Sep 2021 44.9 | Dec 2021 38.9 | Mar 2022 34.6 | Jun 2022 23.0 | Sep 2022 23.3 | Dec 2022 20.3 | Mar 2023 25.8 | Jun 2023 36.0 | Sep 2023 36.6 | Dec 2023 42.8 | Mar 2024 48.0 | Jun 2024 39.0 | Sep 2024 34.8 | Dec 2024 32.8 | Mar 2025 28.4 | Jun 2025 38.2 | Sep 2025 32.5 | Dec 2025 30.6 | Mar 2026 24.8 | Jun 2026 33.8
- POKARNA: Sep 2021 35.3 | Dec 2021 53.4 | Mar 2022 35.7 | Jun 2022 16.9 | Sep 2022 14.3 | Dec 2022 11.2 | Mar 2023 10.1 | Jun 2023 17.3 | Sep 2023 26.0 | Dec 2023 22.9 | Mar 2024 15.5 | Jun 2024 24.1 | Sep 2024 30.6 | Dec 2024 29.3 | Mar 2025 27.4 | Jun 2025 16.7 | Sep 2025 13.4 | Dec 2025 17.7 | Mar 2026 24.2 | Jun 2026 41.8


## What can make this comparison misleading?
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.

## Every company
- Carysil Ltd (CARYSIL) — market value ₹3.4K Cr; latest fundamentals Jun 2026
- Pokarna Ltd (POKARNA) — market value ₹3.0K Cr; latest fundamentals Jun 2026

## Source standing of each company

Cross-checked: 2. Unverified: 0. Withheld: 0. Graded companies: 2.

Every company's second-feed figures reconcile against the primary source on overlapping reported periods, so nothing here is unverified or withheld.

## Methodology and freshness

Fundamentals through Jun 2026; prices through 2026-08-14.
Up to 20 quarters per company. Reported history is normalized to Indian rupees crore. Missing values are not interpolated. Derived metrics are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.

## Frequently asked questions

### Is the Building Material USA sector outperforming NIFTY 500?

Building Material USA has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 23.7% over 52 weeks and 17.1% over 13 weeks. 2 of 2 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 2 beat the sector itself.

### Which Building Material USA company is largest by revenue?

Carysil Ltd leads with revenue of ₹960 crore, based on 2 of 2 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

### Which Building Material USA company is growing fastest?

Carysil Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 14.2%, across 2 of 2 comparable companies.

### Which Building Material USA company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Carysil Ltd ranks first at 78.7/100 with 97% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

### Which Building Material USA company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Carysil Ltd has the lowest comparable PEG at 0.64, among 2 of 2 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

### How much history does this Building Material USA comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

### How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

### Is there a Nifty Building Material USA index?

NSE India maintains Nifty indices for several broad sector categories — Nifty Bank, Nifty IT, Nifty Pharma and others — but not for every sub-sector grouping on this site. Whether or not an official Nifty index covers Building Material USA, this page builds its own equal-weight basket of 2 listed Building Material USA companies — one company, one vote, regardless of market value — so no single large company dominates the reading. Figures are as of Jun 2026.

### Which are the best Building Material USA stocks in India?

Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Carysil Ltd places first among 2 listed Building Material USA companies, followed by Pokarna Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.

### How many Building Material USA stocks are listed in India?

This comparison covers 2 listed Building Material USA companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.

### Which Building Material USA company is the biggest?

Carysil Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹960 crore, ahead of Pokarna Ltd at ₹589 crore. That covers 2 of 2 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.

### Which Building Material USA company has the best profit margins?

Pokarna Ltd has the highest operating margin at 36%, from 2 of 2 comparable companies. Pokarna Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +4 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

### Which Building Material USA company makes the most profit?

Carysil Ltd earns the most, at ₹107 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 2 of 2 comparable companies. Carysil Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 48.6%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

### Which Building Material USA company earns the highest return on capital?

Carysil Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 17.8%, across 2 of 2 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

### Which Building Material USA stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Carysil Ltd screens cheapest at 0.64×. All 2 companies qualify for the ratio comparison. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

### Is the Building Material USA sector beating the market?

Building Material USA has outperformed NIFTY 500 by 23.7% over the last 52 weeks and 17.1% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 2 of 2 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

### Which Building Material USA stock has the strongest price momentum?

Carysil Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

### Which Building Material USA company scores highest for research priority?

Carysil Ltd scores 78.7 out of 100 with 97% evidence confidence, from 30.2 points on growth and earnings, 17.4 on capital efficiency, 13.5 on valuation and 17.6 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

### How many Building Material USA companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 2 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

### What is the total market cap of the Building Material USA sector?

The 2 Building Material USA companies on this page carry ₹6,309 crore of combined market value. Carysil Ltd is the largest at ₹3,356 crore, about 53% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-20.

### How is the Building Material USA sector performing?

2 of the 2 covered Building Material USA companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 23.7% ahead of NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-20.

### Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

### Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.