Sector Alpha Week of 2026-08-04
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Uranium Stocks

Uranium: Cameco Corporation owns the largest revenue base; enCore Energy Corp. has the fastest current growth.

01 · the industry itself · before any single company

How has Uranium moved against S&P 500?

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 102% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies fell 23% on average over the last four reported quarters.

BASING · 1y −7.7%~Price up, without the fundamentals confirming0 of 10 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 0/10 >200d (−1) · 0/10 lead (+0) · EPS 5/10↑

200500100020262025202420232022 915348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100101Mar 22Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 101, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 90, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 17, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 18, against 100 at the start · down 82.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 11, against 100 at the start · down 80.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 42, against 100 at the start · down 61.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 53, against 100 at the start · up 129.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 35, against 100 at the start · down 41.4% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · up 27.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 24, against 100 at the start · down 78.3% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 0, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 0, against 100 at the start · down 83.3% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 0, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 0, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 0, against 100 at the start · down 5.4% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 0, against 100 at the start · up 112.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two0 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
200500100020262025202420232022 915348 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100101Mar 22Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Mar 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingJun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 101, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 90, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 17, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 18, against 100 at the start · down 82.1% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 11, against 100 at the start · down 80.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 42, against 100 at the start · down 61.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 53, against 100 at the start · up 129.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 35, against 100 at the start · down 41.4% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 43, against 100 at the start · up 27.5% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 24, against 100 at the start · down 78.3% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 0, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 0, against 100 at the start · down 83.3% on a year ago · 4 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 0, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 0, against 100 at the start · down 100.0% on a year ago · 4 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 0, against 100 at the start · down 5.4% on a year ago · 4 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 0, against 100 at the start · up 112.9% on a year ago · 4 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two0No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Uranium, equal-weighted, based at 200 S&P 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 10 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks

Is Uranium outperforming S&P 500?

Uranium has underperformed S&P 500 by 7.4% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 26.9%. 0 of 11 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. NexGen Energy Ltd. is the strongest against the sector itself at +12.1%.

-26.9%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
-7.4%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
0/11Stocks leading S&P 500
5/11Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

Uranium has underperformed S&P 500 by 7.4% over 52 weeks and 26.9% over 13 weeks. 0 of 11 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 11 beat the sector itself. Cameco Corporation leads with revenue of $3,538 million, based on 6 of 13 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Companies
13
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$65.7B
Cameco Corporation
Revenue growing
3/5
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
0/11
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 5 of 13
03 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Cameco Corporation has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 81.1% evidence confidence.
IsoEnergy Ltd. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

CompanyScorePrice stageGrowth & earnings/35Capital efficiency/25Valuation/20Relative strength/20
1Cameco CorporationCCJ 55.0/100Mixed-positive evidence81% evidence ASLEEP 19.8/35 Revenue 7.5% · PAT 100% · OPM change -4.1 pp 83% evidence 15.4/25 ROCE 1.8% · OPM 19.4% 76% evidence 5.2/20 P/E 101.3× · PEG 2.64 65% evidence 14.6/20 RS sector 8.5% · RS bench -15.8% · 1Y 21%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 19.8 + 15.4 + 5.2 + 14.6 = 55 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2enCore Energy Corp.EU 51.8/100Thin evidence · provisional55% evidence BASING 24.5/35 Revenue 53.6% · PAT — · OPM change 140.1 pp 62% evidence 14.3/25 ROCE 3% · OPM 54.4% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.0/20 RS sector -40.7% · RS bench -54.6% · 1Y -56.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 24.5 + 14.3 + 10 + 3 = 51.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
3IsoEnergy Ltd.ISOU 48.8/100Thin evidence · provisional52% evidence ASLEEP 13.0/35 Revenue — · PAT -225% · OPM change — 57% evidence 11.8/25 ROCE -1.4% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.6/20 P/E 31.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.4/20 RS sector 9.6% · RS bench -14.6% · 1Y 31.6%1 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13 + 11.8 + 10.6 + 13.4 = 48.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
4Energy Fuels Inc.UUUU 45.3/100Mixed-negative evidence64% evidence ASLEEP 23.0/35 Revenue 21.4% · PAT — · OPM change 107.8 pp 62% evidence 9.0/25 ROCE -1.7% · OPM -47.2% 76% evidence 11.5/20 P/E 11.6× · PEG — 15% evidence 1.8/20 RS sector -10.6% · RS bench -31.6% · 1Y 34.7%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 23 + 9 + 11.5 + 1.8 = 45.3 · Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -10.6% and the one-year return is 34.7%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
5Centrus Energy Corp.LEU 41.7/100Mixed-negative evidence81% evidence BASING 7.5/35 Revenue -4% · PAT -43% · OPM change -27 pp 83% evidence 13.0/25 ROCE 0.1% · OPM 1% 76% evidence 11.6/20 P/E 57.5× · PEG 1.26 65% evidence 9.6/20 RS sector -5.5% · RS bench -27.3% · 1Y -15.2%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 7.5 + 13 + 11.6 + 9.6 = 41.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
6Denison Mines Corp.DNN 40.6/100Thin evidence · provisional60% evidence ASLEEP 8.6/35 Revenue 0% · PAT — · OPM change -3004.9 pp 62% evidence 8.3/25 ROCE -3.5% · OPM — 61% evidence 9.8/20 P/E 45.7× · PEG — 15% evidence 13.9/20 RS sector 10.6% · RS bench -14.3% · 1Y 40.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 8.6 + 8.3 + 9.8 + 13.9 = 40.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
7Uranium Energy Corp.UEC 33.8/100Thin evidence · provisional53% evidence ASLEEP 14.2/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -109.3 pp 32% evidence 7.6/25 ROCE -3.2% · OPM -116.6% 76% evidence 8.5/20 P/E 595× · PEG — 15% evidence 3.5/20 RS sector -6.6% · RS bench -28.1% · 1Y 3.1%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 14.2 + 7.6 + 8.5 + 3.5 = 33.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
8Uranium Royalty Corp.UROY 62.5/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 22.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change 43717.6 pp 39% evidence 17.3/25 ROCE 15.9% · OPM 17.6% 76% evidence 11.1/20 P/E 14.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 11.6/20 RS sector 6.8% · RS bench -17.4% · 1Y 27.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 22.5 + 17.3 + 11.1 + 11.6 = 62.5 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
9NexGen Energy Ltd.NXE 53.8/100Thin evidence · provisional50% evidence ASLEEP 16.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 10.7/25 ROCE -1.5% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.2/20 P/E 40.2× · PEG — 15% evidence 16.5/20 RS sector 12.1% · RS bench -13% · 1Y 41.9%0 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence
Exact sum: 16.4 + 10.7 + 10.2 + 16.5 = 53.8 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
10Deep Fission, Inc.FISN 46.4/100Thin evidence · provisional27% evidence 20.1/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 33% evidence 6.3/25 ROCE -47% · OPM — 61% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence
Exact sum: 20.1 + 6.3 + 10 + 10 = 46.4 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
11Nuclea Energy Inc.NCLA 44.9/100Thin evidence · provisional11% evidence 17.5/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 0% evidence 7.4/25 ROCE -58.4% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 10.0/20 RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y — 0% evidence
Exact sum: 17.5 + 7.4 + 10 + 10 = 44.9 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
12Ur-Energy Inc.URG 39.6/100Thin evidence · provisional47% evidence ASLEEP 15.6/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -68.1 pp 39% evidence 5.1/25 ROCE -9.7% · OPM -517.2% 76% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 8.9/20 RS sector -0.6% · RS bench -23% · 1Y 6.6%0 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 15.6 + 5.1 + 10 + 8.9 = 39.6 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp.NUCL 34.3/100Thin evidence · provisional34% evidence ASLEEP 13.4/35 Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change — 24% evidence 7.0/25 ROCE -259.2% · OPM — 46% evidence 10.0/20 P/E — · PEG — 0% evidence 3.9/20 RS sector -25.6% · RS bench -42.3% · 1Y -43.6%6 of 12 weeks ahead 70% evidence
Exact sum: 13.4 + 7 + 10 + 3.9 = 34.3 · Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
Showing 10 of 13 companies
04 · what price has already done

Market action

NexGen Energy Ltd. has the strongest one-year price move in Uranium at +41.9%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at -13%. 0 of 11 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-08-04.

Price and relative strength

Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

05 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Cameco Corporation has the highest Revenue among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at $3,538 million. Centrus Energy Corp. is next at $453 million. enCore Energy Corp. has the highest Revenue growth at 53.6%, so level and change sit with different companies. 6 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Cameco Corporation is the scale leader at $3,538 million, 681% ahead of Centrus Energy Corp.. enCore Energy Corp.'s growth is 53.6% from a $43 million base, with 12 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderCameco Corporation · $3,538 million
Gap681% versus #2 · Centrus Energy Corp.
Persistence7/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/13 companies · 126 observations

Investor read: Cameco Corporation is the scale benchmark; enCore Energy Corp. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Cameco Corporation's growth falls below enCore Energy Corp.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
Revenue growthfastest growers
Revenue · company comparison
6/13 level · 5/13 change

On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Cameco Corporation CCJ$845M7.1%Mar 2026
Centrus Energy Corp. LEU$77M5.5%Mar 2026
Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU$36M112%Mar 2026
Uranium Energy Corp. UEC$20M-60%Jun 2026
enCore Energy Corp. EU$18M0.0%Mar 2026
Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY$17M-100%Jun 2026
Ur-Energy Inc. URG$4M-57%Mar 2026
Denison Mines Corp. DNN$1M0.0%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Cameco Corporation · CCJ

$361M
$465M
$398M
$558M
$389M
$524M
$687M
$482M
$575M
$844M
$634M
$598M
$721M
$1.2B
$789M
$877M
$615M
$1.2B
$845M

Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU

$91M
$89M
$35M
$99M
$33M
$126M
$67M
$98M
$51M
$104M
$44M
$189M
$58M
$152M
$73M
$155M
$75M
$146M
$77M

Denison Mines Corp. · DNN

$10M
$3M
$4M
$7M
$3M
$3M
$-1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M
$1M

enCore Energy Corp. · EU

$7M
$4M
$0M
$30M
$5M
$9M
$-4M
$18M
$4M
$9M
$12M
$18M

Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU

$1M
$3M
$6M
$3M
$0M
$20M
$7M
$11M
$0M
$25M
$9M
$4M
$40M
$17M
$4M
$18M
$27M
$36M

Ur-Energy Inc. · URG

$0M
$16M
$0M
$19M
$6M
$0M
$6M
$5M
$5M
$6M
$23M
$10M
$6M
$10M
$4M

Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC

$13M
$10M
$0M
$57M
$48M
$20M
$39M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$17M
$50M
$0M
$20M

Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY

$14M
$15M
$15M
$12M
$11M
$0M
$5M
$33M
$0M
$17M

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Cameco Corporation · CCJ

55%
7.8%
13%
73%
-14%
48%
61%
-7.7%
24%
25%
40%
24%
47%
-15%
1.5%
7.1%

Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU

60%
-64%
42%
91%
-1.0%
55%
-17%
-34%
93%
14%
46%
66%
-18%
29%
-4.0%
5.5%

Denison Mines Corp. · DNN

40%
-70%
0.0%
-125%
-86%
-67%
-67%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%

enCore Energy Corp. · EU

-29%
125%
-40%
-20%
0.0%
0.0%

Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU

200%
567%
17%
267%
25%
29%
-64%
-32%
-56%
350%
-33%
112%

Ur-Energy Inc. · URG

19%
-74%
0.0%
360%
100%
0.0%
-57%

Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC

269%
100%
-100%
-100%
-100%
-60%

Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY

-14%
-27%
-100%
-58%
-100%
06 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

enCore Energy Corp. has the highest OPM among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at 54.4%. Cameco Corporation is next at 19.4%. Uranium Royalty Corp. has the highest Margin change at +43717.6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 7 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: enCore Energy Corp. leads opm at 54.4%; Uranium Royalty Corp. leads margin change at +43717.6 percentage points.

LeaderenCore Energy Corp. · 54.4%
Gap180.4% versus #2 · Cameco Corporation
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/13 companies · 101 observations

Investor read: enCore Energy Corp. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Margin changefastest expanders
1Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY+43,717.6 pp
2enCore Energy Corp. EU+140.1 pp
3Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU+107.8 pp
4Cameco Corporation CCJ−4.1 pp
5Centrus Energy Corp. LEU−27.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
7/13 level · 8/13 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
enCore Energy Corp. EU54%+140.1 ppMar 2026
Cameco Corporation CCJ19%−4.1 ppMar 2026
Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY18%+43,717.6 ppJun 2026
Centrus Energy Corp. LEU1.0%−27.0 ppMar 2026
Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU-47%+107.8 ppMar 2026
Uranium Energy Corp. UEC-117%−109.3 ppJun 2026
Denison Mines Corp. DNN-464%−3,004.9 ppMar 2026
Ur-Energy Inc. URG-517%−68.1 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Cameco Corporation · CCJ

-18%
-0.5%
1.7%
15%
-4.4%
-11%
14%
7.3%
24%
2.1%
20%
17%
14%
15%
24%
19%
15%
14%
19%

Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU

42%
24%
-9.6%
45%
-39%
25%
12%
15%
-5.7%
32%
-24%
11%
-13%
30%
28%
22%
-22%
8.8%
1.0%

Denison Mines Corp. · DNN

-383%
-343%
-217%
-496%
-535%
399%
-464%

enCore Energy Corp. · EU

-89%
-165%
-40%
-432%
-188%
6.7%
-86%
-526%
-158%
-136%
54%

Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU

-393%
-38%
28%
-90%
42%
-19%
27%
46%
29%
-35%
-12%
-155%
-207%
-44%
-3.0%
-47%

Ur-Energy Inc. · URG

-30%
-26%
-48%
-181%
-154%
-245%
-185%
-104%
-151%
-313%
-172%
-517%

Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC

-37%
-37%
6.3%
11%
-17%
9.4%
-77%
-7.3%
-117%

Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY

11%
7.8%
29%
25%
1.1%
-21%
9.2%
18%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Cameco Corporation · CCJ

+25.7 pp
+13.6 pp
−10.7 pp
+12.1 pp
−7.8 pp
+28.0 pp
+13.3 pp
+6.2 pp
+9.7 pp
−9.7 pp
+13.2 pp
+3.5 pp
+1.9 pp
+1.2 pp
−0.9 pp
−4.1 pp

Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU

+33.0 pp
−80.4 pp
+0.4 pp
+22.0 pp
−30.4 pp
+32.9 pp
+6.7 pp
−36.7 pp
−3.4 pp
−7.5 pp
−1.8 pp
+52.3 pp
+10.5 pp
−9.0 pp
−20.9 pp
−27.0 pp

Denison Mines Corp. · DNN

−174.2 pp
−112.5 pp
−192.1 pp
+3,746.8 pp
−2,012.0 pp
−9,588.3 pp
−4,822.3 pp
−3,445.9 pp
+959.1 pp
+6,347.6 pp
+3,594.5 pp
+1,601.0 pp
+2,405.9 pp
+3,272.1 pp
−209.1 pp
−3,004.9 pp

enCore Energy Corp. · EU

−342.5 pp
−22.7 pp
+2,884.9 pp
−45.3 pp
−94.3 pp
+29.3 pp
−142.6 pp
+140.1 pp

Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU

+480.3 pp
+303.1 pp
+80.5 pp
−47.6 pp
+116.2 pp
+332.2 pp
+3.4 pp
+48.6 pp
−61.7 pp
+1,199.9 pp
−200.5 pp
−235.8 pp
−8.8 pp
+8.7 pp
+107.8 pp

Ur-Energy Inc. · URG

+38,927.8 pp
+4.4 pp
+3,957.9 pp
−128.8 pp
+22,654.8 pp
−4.7 pp
+50.4 pp
+94.1 pp
−127.9 pp
−68.1 pp

Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC

+48.0 pp
+20.0 pp
+11,837.6 pp
−10,548.0 pp
−10,458.0 pp
+10,464.4 pp
+10,440.1 pp
−109.3 pp

Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY

+13.6 pp
−6.7 pp
−43,729.0 pp
−45.4 pp
−7,864.5 pp
+43,717.6 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Cameco Corporation has the highest Net profit among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at $651 million. Centrus Energy Corp. is next at $61 million. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at the 100% top of the scoring scale. 11 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Cameco Corporation leads with $651 million of TTM profit, 10.7× the profit of Centrus Energy Corp.. Cameco Corporation shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (162.5% uncapped) growth from a $651 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderCameco Corporation · $651 million
Gap10.7× versus #2 · Centrus Energy Corp.
Persistence5/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage11/13 companies · 216 observations

Investor read: Cameco Corporation sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
3Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. NUCL · older report$-5M
4IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU$-10M
Profit growthfastest growers
3IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU-225%
Net profit · company comparison
11/13 level · 3/13 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Cameco Corporation CCJ$131M87%Mar 2026
Centrus Energy Corp. LEU$10M-63%Mar 2026
enCore Energy Corp. EU$3M-2,300%Mar 2026
Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY$2M-117%Jun 2026
IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU$-2M-140%Mar 2026
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. NUCL$-2MDec 2025
Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU$-11M-400%Mar 2026
Deep Fission, Inc. FISN$-21MMar 2026
Ur-Energy Inc. URG$-29MMar 2026
Uranium Energy Corp. UEC$-52M-600%Jun 2026
Denison Mines Corp. DNN$-115M-186%Mar 2026
NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE$-156M-1,390%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Cameco Corporation · CCJ

$-72M
$11M
$40M
$84M
$-20M
$-15M
$119M
$14M
$148M
$80M
$-7M
$36M
$7M
$135M
$70M
$321M
$0M
$199M
$131M

Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU

$42M
$116M
$0M
$37M
$-6M
$21M
$7M
$13M
$8M
$56M
$-6M
$31M
$-5M
$54M
$27M
$29M
$4M
$18M
$10M

Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN

$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$0M
$-2M
$-2M
$-3M
$0M
$-40M
$-13M
$-21M

Denison Mines Corp. · DNN

$33M
$-3M
$43M
$-16M
$-6M
$-6M
$-3M
$0M
$58M
$35M
$-20M
$-16M
$-26M
$-30M
$-44M
$12M
$-135M
$-51M
$-115M

Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. · NUCL

$0M
$0M
$0M
$-1M
$-1M
$-1M
$-1M
$-2M

enCore Energy Corp. · EU

$-3M
$-2M
$-4M
$-2M
$-5M
$0M
$-7M
$-6M
$4M
$-3M
$-8M
$-24M
$-18M
$1M
$-25M
$-9M
$-6M
$-22M
$3M

Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU

$-2M
$4M
$-1M
$2M
$-3M
$-3M
$8M
$-1M
$3M
$-6M
$12M
$3M
$-1M
$-5M
$-26M
$-9M
$-8M
$-1M
$-11M

IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU

$-4M
$-6M
$-9M
$8M
$-11M
$5M
$-5M
$4M
$-22M
$5M
$-5M
$-6M
$4M
$5M
$5M
$-2M
$0M
$-6M
$-2M

NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE

$-20M
$232M
$30M
$18M
$-27M
$-24M
$-9M
$-17M
$-63M
$160M
$-34M
$13M
$10M
$-66M
$-51M
$-87M
$-129M
$-43M
$-156M

Ur-Energy Inc. · URG

$-9M
$0M
$-7M
$0M
$-5M
$-5M
$-1M
$-7M
$-17M
$-5M
$-19M
$-7M
$-8M
$-20M
$-11M
$-21M
$-27M
$-16M
$-29M

Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC

$-2M
$-2M
$-5M
$7M
$5M
$-4M
$11M
$-11M
$1M
$3M
$2M
$-20M
$-15M
$-20M
$-10M
$-30M
$-27M
$-10M
$-14M
$-52M

Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY

$-1M
$-1M
$-2M
$-1M
$-2M
$-2M
$-2M
$1M
$-1M
$3M
$4M
$6M
$-2M
$0M
$-2M
$-1M
$2M
$2M
$2M

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Cameco Corporation · CCJ

-236%
198%
-83%
-106%
157%
-95%
69%
792%
-100%
47%
87%

Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU

208%
-114%
-82%
-65%
167%
-186%
138%
-163%
-3.6%
-6.5%
-67%
-63%

Denison Mines Corp. · DNN

-118%
-107%
-145%
-186%

enCore Energy Corp. · EU

-550%
-2,300%

Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU

-175%
-150%
50%
-133%
-317%
-400%

IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU

-50%
0.0%
-250%
0.0%
-100%
-220%
-140%

NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE

-110%
-130%
-194%
-141%
-769%
-1,390%

Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC

-257%
-80%
-82%
-1,600%
-767%
-600%

Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY

500%
-100%
-150%
-117%
08 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Uranium Royalty Corp. has the highest ROCE among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at 15.9%. enCore Energy Corp. is next at 3%. Nuclea Energy Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +6646.1 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Uranium Royalty Corp. leads ROCE at 15.9%, 12.9 percentage points above enCore Energy Corp.. Nuclea Energy Inc. has the strongest latest improvement at +6646.1 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderUranium Royalty Corp. · 15.9%
Gap430% versus #2 · enCore Energy Corp.
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage13/13 companies · 214 observations

Investor read: Uranium Royalty Corp. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
5IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU-1.4%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Nuclea Energy Inc. NCLA+6,646.1 pp
2Deep Fission, Inc. FISN+24.2 pp
3Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY+17.5 pp
5Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU+3.5 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
13/13 level · 13/13 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY16%+17.5 ppJun 2026
enCore Energy Corp. EU3.0%+7.2 ppMar 2026
Cameco Corporation CCJ1.8%−0.3 ppMar 2026
Centrus Energy Corp. LEU0.1%−4.0 ppMar 2026
IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU-1.4%0.0 ppMar 2026
NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE-1.5%−0.2 ppMar 2026
Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU-1.7%+3.5 ppMar 2026
Uranium Energy Corp. UEC-3.2%−0.7 ppJun 2026
Denison Mines Corp. DNN-3.5%−4.4 ppMar 2026
Ur-Energy Inc. URG-9.7%+1.5 ppMar 2026
Deep Fission, Inc. FISN-47%+24.2 ppMar 2026
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. NUCL-259%−427.3 ppDec 2025
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Cameco Corporation · CCJ

-0.9%
0.0%
0.1%
1.2%
-0.2%
-0.8%
1.2%
0.5%
1.8%
0.2%
1.5%
1.2%
1.2%
2.1%
2.1%
1.9%
1.0%
1.9%
1.8%

Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU

25%
15%
-2.1%
23%
-6.9%
14%
3.4%
5.4%
-1.1%
11%
-3.5%
7.3%
-2.6%
8.4%
4.1%
6.0%
-1.8%
0.9%
0.1%

Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN

0.0%
0.0%
39%
34%
64%
29%
24%
22%
15%
-1.6%
26%
26%
584%
-62%
-71%
-0.5%
-59%
-63%
-47%

Denison Mines Corp. · DNN

-9.4%
-2.8%
-13%
-3.1%
-3.0%
-3.2%
-4.3%
-4.2%
-14%
-9.7%
-1.7%
-2.8%
-4.2%
-3.1%
0.9%
2.3%
-0.6%
-2.9%
-3.5%

Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. · NUCL

168%
-51%
-86%
-259%

enCore Energy Corp. · EU

-13%
-1.9%
-4.0%
-4.2%
-4.7%
0.0%
-3.3%
-2.7%
-2.8%
-5.0%
-3.5%
-8.0%
-5.9%
-0.1%
-4.2%
-6.2%
-4.8%
-4.3%
3.0%

Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU

-1.3%
0.0%
-0.5%
0.7%
-1.0%
-15%
2.5%
-0.4%
0.9%
-2.8%
3.0%
0.7%
-0.4%
-1.0%
-5.2%
-1.6%
-1.4%
-0.1%
-1.7%

IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU

-1.1%
-4.0%
-3.2%
-2.6%
-4.3%
-3.2%
-2.1%
-2.1%
-2.4%
-2.1%
-1.7%
-1.5%
-2.2%
-2.0%
-1.4%
-1.1%
-1.2%
-1.8%
-1.4%

NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE

-1.9%
-4.6%
-2.2%
-2.2%
-3.0%
-3.9%
-2.6%
-2.8%
-3.6%
-4.5%
-2.3%
-2.0%
-1.8%
-2.4%
-1.3%
-1.3%
-2.1%
-2.4%
-1.5%

Ur-Energy Inc. · URG

-4.2%
-5.0%
-5.0%
-5.1%
-4.4%
13%
-2.5%
-7.5%
-9.2%
-7.6%
-13%
-8.5%
-7.6%
-16%
-11%
-11%
-11%
-8.6%
-9.7%

Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC

-3.1%
-2.6%
-1.5%
-3.7%
0.8%
1.0%
-0.7%
0.7%
-1.6%
-1.5%
-1.8%
-2.4%
-1.6%
-0.4%
-2.5%
-3.4%
-2.6%
-1.9%
-3.2%

Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY

-1.8%
-2.0%
-2.2%
-2.1%
-2.3%
-2.7%
-3.2%
-1.9%
-1.7%
-0.1%
2.6%
2.9%
2.6%
2.1%
-0.1%
-1.6%
0.2%
-0.8%
0.5%
16%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Cameco Corporation · CCJ

+0.7 pp
−0.8 pp
+1.1 pp
−0.7 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.6 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.3 pp

Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU

−32.0 pp
−0.1 pp
+5.5 pp
−17.9 pp
+5.8 pp
−3.2 pp
−6.9 pp
+1.9 pp
−1.5 pp
−2.8 pp
+7.6 pp
−1.3 pp
+0.8 pp
−7.5 pp
−4.0 pp

Deep Fission, Inc. · FISN

+64.2 pp
+28.7 pp
−14.9 pp
−12.4 pp
−49.6 pp
−30.3 pp
+2.0 pp
+4.5 pp
+569.8 pp
−60.2 pp
−97.0 pp
−26.7 pp
−643.5 pp
−0.8 pp
+24.2 pp

Denison Mines Corp. · DNN

+6.4 pp
−0.4 pp
+8.4 pp
−1.1 pp
−11.2 pp
−6.5 pp
+2.6 pp
+1.4 pp
+10.0 pp
+6.6 pp
+2.6 pp
+5.1 pp
+3.6 pp
+0.2 pp
−4.4 pp

Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. · NUCL

−427.3 pp

enCore Energy Corp. · EU

+8.7 pp
+1.9 pp
+0.7 pp
+1.5 pp
+1.9 pp
−5.0 pp
−0.2 pp
−5.3 pp
−3.1 pp
+4.9 pp
−0.7 pp
+1.8 pp
+1.1 pp
−4.2 pp
+7.2 pp

Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU

+0.3 pp
−15.1 pp
+3.0 pp
−1.1 pp
+1.9 pp
+12.3 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.1 pp
−1.3 pp
+1.8 pp
−8.2 pp
−2.3 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.9 pp
+3.5 pp

IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU

−3.2 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.5 pp
+1.9 pp
+1.1 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.2 pp
0.0 pp

NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE

−1.1 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.4 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.6 pp
+0.3 pp
+0.8 pp
+1.8 pp
+2.1 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.7 pp
−0.3 pp
0.0 pp
−0.2 pp

Ur-Energy Inc. · URG

−0.2 pp
+17.9 pp
+2.5 pp
−2.4 pp
−4.8 pp
−20.5 pp
−10.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+1.6 pp
−8.5 pp
+1.3 pp
−2.6 pp
−3.6 pp
+7.5 pp
+1.5 pp

Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC

+3.9 pp
+3.6 pp
+0.8 pp
+4.4 pp
−2.4 pp
−2.5 pp
−1.1 pp
−3.1 pp
0.0 pp
+1.1 pp
−0.7 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.5 pp
−0.7 pp

Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY

−0.5 pp
−0.7 pp
−1.0 pp
+0.2 pp
+0.6 pp
+2.6 pp
+5.8 pp
+4.8 pp
+4.3 pp
+2.2 pp
−2.7 pp
−4.5 pp
−2.4 pp
−2.9 pp
+0.6 pp
+17.5 pp
09 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Centrus Energy Corp. has the lowest PEG among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at 1.26×. Cameco Corporation is next at 2.64×. Energy Fuels Inc. has the lowest P/E at 11.6×, so level and change sit with different companies. 2 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Centrus Energy Corp. has the lowest comparable PEG at 1.26×, 52.3% below Cameco Corporation. Only 2 of 13 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderCentrus Energy Corp. · 1.26×
Gap52.3% versus #2 · Cameco Corporation
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/13 companies · 6 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
P/Elowest P/E
3IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU31.7
4NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE40.2
Valuation · company comparison
2/13 level · 8/13 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
CompanyPEGP/EReported
Cameco Corporation CCJ2.6101.3Mar 2026
Centrus Energy Corp. LEU1.357.5Mar 2026
NexGen Energy Ltd. NXE40.2Mar 2026
Uranium Energy Corp. UEC595.0Jun 2026
Energy Fuels Inc. UUUU11.6Mar 2026
Denison Mines Corp. DNN45.7Mar 2026
Uranium Royalty Corp. UROY14.2Jun 2026
IsoEnergy Ltd. ISOU31.7Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

PEG · reported quarter history

Cameco Corporation · CCJ

6.3
2.6

Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU

0.2
0.2
3.5
1.3

P/E · reported quarter history

Cameco Corporation · CCJ

169.1
126.5
139.8
90.8
197.6
89.8
68.9
110.7
116.2
248.5
189.1
84.6
74.3
87.1
93.0
101.3

Centrus Energy Corp. · LEU

37.9
5.1
3.4
2.2
5.0
9.6
8.3
14.8
18.1
10.0
9.1
7.6
11.5
14.9
9.7
30.1
47.1
62.3
57.5

Denison Mines Corp. · DNN

92.0
87.0
40.8
42.3
77.5
31.9
23.2
33.1
45.7

Energy Fuels Inc. · UUUU

6.2
7.5
4.1
5.2
12.7
12.0
12.6
11.6

IsoEnergy Ltd. · ISOU

31.7

NexGen Energy Ltd. · NXE

24.0
21.2
15.4
9.6
10.8
58.0
95.6
73.5
40.2

Uranium Energy Corp. · UEC

210.0
210.5
57.6
261.0
595.0

Uranium Royalty Corp. · UROY

-45.5
-802.1
107.0
39.5
-194.2
-98,101.2
232.4
14.2
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Uranium comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. 1 of the 13 companies reports on an older date than the sector's freshest reporters, so its rank is marked stale. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 1 company has an older fundamental reporting date than the sector’s freshest reporters; its rank carries a stale marker.
  • Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
11 · evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 13 Uranium companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-04. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-04 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers

Uranium company comparison FAQs

These 22 answers restate the Uranium comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 13 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-04. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

Is the Uranium sector outperforming S&P 500?

Uranium has underperformed S&P 500 by 7.4% over 52 weeks and 26.9% over 13 weeks. 0 of 11 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 5 of 11 beat the sector itself.

Which Uranium company is largest by revenue?

Cameco Corporation leads with revenue of $3,538 million, based on 6 of 13 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Uranium company is growing fastest?

enCore Energy Corp. has the fastest current revenue growth at 53.6%, across 5 of 13 comparable companies.

Which Uranium company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Cameco Corporation ranks first at 55/100 with 81.1% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Uranium company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Centrus Energy Corp. has the lowest comparable PEG at 1.26, among 2 of 13 companies whose earnings and growth are steady enough for the ratio to mean anything.

How much history does this Uranium comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Which Uranium company is the biggest?

Cameco Corporation is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of $3,538 million, ahead of Centrus Energy Corp. at $453 million. That covers 6 of 13 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Uranium company has the best profit margins?

enCore Energy Corp. has the highest operating margin at 54.4%, from 7 of 13 comparable companies. Uranium Royalty Corp. shows the biggest recent improvement, at +43717.6 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Uranium company makes the most profit?

Cameco Corporation earns the most, at $651 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 11 of 13 comparable companies. Cameco Corporation has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Uranium company earns the highest return on capital?

Uranium Royalty Corp. leads on return on capital employed at 15.9%, across 13 of 13 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Uranium stock is the cheapest?

On PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Centrus Energy Corp. screens cheapest at 1.26×. Only 2 of 13 companies have earnings and growth steady enough for the ratio to mean anything, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Is the Uranium sector beating the market?

Uranium has underperformed S&P 500 by 7.4% over the last 52 weeks and 26.9% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 0 of 11 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.

Which Uranium stock has the strongest price momentum?

NexGen Energy Ltd. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Uranium company scores highest for research priority?

Cameco Corporation scores 55 out of 100 with 81.1% evidence confidence, from 19.8 points on growth and earnings, 15.4 on capital efficiency, 5.2 on valuation and 14.6 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Uranium companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 13 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Uranium sector?

The 13 Uranium companies on this page carry $65,667 million of combined market value. Cameco Corporation is the largest at $40,557 million, about 62% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-04.

What is the Uranium sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 13 Uranium companies on this page is 45.7×, measured on the 8 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-08-04.

How is the Uranium sector performing?

0 of the 11 covered Uranium companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 7.4% behind S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-04.

How many Uranium stocks are listed in the US?

This comparison covers 13 listed Uranium companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI