Uranium Stocks in the US

The largest Uranium stocks in the US by market value are Cameco Corporation ($31.3B), NexGen Energy ($5.4B) and Uranium Energy Corp. ($3.6B), at prices of 4 Nov 2026.

• Cameco Corporation: $71.68 | market value $31.3B | P/E 177.4
• NexGen Energy: $8.00 | market value $5.4B
• Uranium Energy Corp.: $7.19 | market value $3.6B
• Denison Mines Corp.: $2.11 | market value $1.9B
• Centrus Energy Corp.: $92.58 | market value $1.9B | P/E 68.1
• Energy Fuels Inc.: $7.18 | market value $1.8B
• Uranium Royalty Corp.: $3.13 | market value $1.2B | P/E 23.4
• IsoEnergy: $8.07 | market value $527M
• Nuclea Energy Inc.: null | market value $354M
• Ur-Energy Inc.: $0.75 | market value $302M

The other 3 Uranium companies are in the full list below.

Share price | market value | P/E, biggest first. Prices and market values as of 4 Nov 2026; ratios as in the score list below.

Ranked by the 4-Factor Sector Score (growth & earnings 35, capital efficiency 25, valuation 20, relative strength 20). Prices as of 4 Nov 2026.

All 13 listed US Uranium companies are named here, largest first. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies and carries its own as-of date. One large company cannot set the reading.

1. Cameco Corporation$31.3B
2. NexGen Energy Ltd.$5.4B
3. Uranium Energy Corp.$3.6B
4. Denison Mines Corp.$1.9B
5. Centrus Energy Corp.$1.9B
6. Energy Fuels Inc.$1.8B
7. Uranium Royalty Corp.$1.2B
8. IsoEnergy Ltd.$527M
9. Nuclea Energy Inc.$354M
10. Ur-Energy Inc.$302M
11. enCore Energy Corp.$146M
12. Deep Fission, Inc.$130M
13. Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp.$123M

8 Uranium companies in the Uranium industry group (every listed company) have a page on Sector Alpha, by market value as of 4 November 2026, and all 8 are listed below, largest first. The largest is Cameco Corporation ($31.3 billion) and the smallest with a market value is enCore Energy Corp.

Download all 8 Uranium companies (CSV)

The line below covers up to 5.2 years and opens on the 5Y view; the buttons cut it shorter. Over the last two years (104 weeks) this industry is 5% behind S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 19% on average over the last four reported quarters.

0 of the 9 companies with a long enough price record ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months.

Not ahead of S&P 500 on the three-month view this week; 0 of the 9 companies in the industry index above their 200-day average (1 fewer than four weeks earlier); 0 of those 9 ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months (1 fewer than four weeks earlier); earnings rising at 3 of the 9 that report earnings.

Not ahead of S&P 500, not building participation, not giving any back. Earnings not confirming, 3 of 9 members have higher trailing twelve-month earnings than a year ago.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the gap between them tells the story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of 9 of its 13 companies (the 4 with too short a price record are ranked in the scorecard but cannot sit in this line). The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member set to 100 at the start and the industry taking the middle value, so a price line pulling away from flat bars means the market is paying more for the same earnings. A bar turns grey when that figure is lower than the quarter before. The rules are fixed and the same everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover or tap any point to read both values and the gap.

Uranium has done worse than the S&P 500 by 48.4% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a shortfall of 39.9%. Uranium Royalty Corp. is the strongest against the sector itself at +40.8%.

Uranium has done worse than the S&P 500 by 48.4% over 52 weeks and by 39.9% over 13 weeks. 0 of 13 companies we track are beating the S&P 500 on relative strength (how a share price has done against the index over recent months) (2 have no relative-strength reading yet), and 6 of the 11 with a long enough price history are ahead of the industry itself.

A score that ranks each company against the others in its industry. The four parts shown always add up to the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or old evidence affects only its own part, never as a hidden adjustment.

Uranium Royalty Corp. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 66.7% evidence confidence.

Ranked last: too little evidence (5 companies)

Under 60% of the evidence behind these scores is available, so they rank after every company above, whatever the score.

IsoEnergy Ltd. has the strongest one-year price move in Uranium at +0.2%. Uranium Royalty Corp. leads on relative strength against the S&P 500, at −21.2%. 0 of 13 companies we track are ahead of the index on that measure (2 have no relative-strength reading yet). Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 4 November 2026.

Price and relative strength

Price · same starting point: Every company, the sector's own index and S&P 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts: the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.

RS vs S&P 500: How far ahead of or behind S&P 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS S&P 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.

RS vs sector: The same measure taken against Uranium itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.

Biggest one-year moves

Strongest against S&P 500

Strongest against the sector itself

Cameco Corporation has the highest Revenue among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at $3,475 million. Centrus Energy Corp. is next at $474 million. Uranium Royalty Corp. has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Revenue series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Cameco Corporation is the largest at $3,475 million, 633.1% ahead of Centrus Energy Corp. Uranium Royalty Corp.'s growth is capped at 100% on the scoring scale; the full change over the last 12 months is 511.4% from a $214 million base, with 12 reported quarters out of the last 20. Fast growth from a smaller base is not yet the same as proven size.

What this means: Cameco Corporation is the size to compare against; Uranium Royalty Corp. is the one growing fastest. The faster grower has to keep that growth and turn it into margin and returns before it counts as more than a fast start.

This conclusion weakens if: Cameco Corporation's growth falls below Uranium Royalty Corp.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.

Revenue · company comparison

Revenue · largest

Revenue growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

Revenue shows both size and speed. A large company can absorb shocks and pay for wide distribution; faster growth can mean market-share gains, new capacity or stronger demand. The best sign is usually growth that lasts without hurting margins and returns.

Uranium Royalty Corp. has the highest OPM among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at 31.7%. Cameco Corporation is next at 9.1%. Energy Fuels Inc. has the highest Margin change at +542.4 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 7 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Sep 2026.

What the numbers say: Uranium Royalty Corp. leads opm at 31.7%; Energy Fuels Inc. leads margin change at +542.4 percentage points.

What this means: Uranium Royalty Corp. sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.

Operating margin · company comparison

OPM · highest

Margin change · fastest expanders

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Cameco Corporation has the highest Net profit among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at $355 million. Uranium Royalty Corp. is next at $54 million. The same company also has the highest Profit growth, at −33.4%. 12 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Cameco Corporation earns the most, $355 million of profit over the last 12 months, 557.4% above Uranium Royalty Corp. A fast rate from a small base matters less than a large profit that keeps coming.

What this means: Cameco Corporation sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.

Net profit · company comparison

Net profit · largest

Profit growth · fastest growers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Cameco Corporation has the highest ROCE among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at 5%. Uranium Royalty Corp. is next at 3.7%. Nuclea Energy Inc. has the highest ROCE change at +6646.1 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 13 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Cameco Corporation leads ROCE at 5%, 1.3 percentage points above Uranium Royalty Corp. A high return reported once may be one good year; a high return reported year after year shows a lasting business.

What this means: Cameco Corporation sets the level to compare against; the company improving fastest needs another report to confirm the change.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.

Return on capital · company comparison

ROCE · highest

ROCE change · fastest improvers

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Centrus Energy Corp. has the lowest PEG among the 13 Uranium companies compared here, at 1.32×. Uranium Energy Corp. has the lowest P/E at −616.2×, so level and change sit with different companies. 1 of 13 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026. Its PEG series carries 4 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: That would need today's multiple, the company's own history and steady growth to agree.

What this means: A low valuation is a reason to look closer at the business, not a conclusion on its own.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is worked out the same way every time, as the P/E on the last 12 months of reported earnings divided by that growth rate, never on expected earnings. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.

Valuation · company comparison

PEG · lowest PEG

P/E · lowest P/E

All-company data · latest reported quarter

This Uranium comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 13 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still come from a very small starting figure.

Keep these limits visible

• A high growth rate can come from a very small starting figure. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
• A high ROCE can be temporary, or look high because the capital base is small. It is best read beside margin, cash flow and how much is spent back on the business.
• The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks published data only. Management quality, upcoming events and risks are not part of it.
• An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
• Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 13 Uranium companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Sep 2026 and market data through 4 November 2026.

These 21 answers restate the Uranium comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 13 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Sep 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 4 November 2026. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.