Monika Alcobev share price

Monika Alcobev Ltd's share price was ₹127.55 at the close on 26 October 2026. It has been falling for 40 weeks. That is 39.2% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹121 and ₹297, and at that close it sat 4% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Monika Alcobev Ltd is in stage 4. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the NIFTY 500, and it has been behind for 11 weeks running.

Over the last 1 year the share price moved −55% while the NIFTY 500 moved −7%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 13 February 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

For January to March 2026 (the quarter ended 31 March 2026), Monika Alcobev reported revenue of ₹184 crore, up 21.1% from ₹152 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹22.0 crore, up 22.2% from ₹18.0 crore.

Monika Alcobev results: January to March 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for April to June 2026, were due by 14 August 2026: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter). This page shows them once our weekly data update has read them.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 31 March 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Monika Alcobev closed at ₹127.55 on 26 October 2026, down 56.4% from ₹292.50 a year earlier (24 October 2025). Its highest weekly close since July 2025 was ₹328.80 on 1 August 2025.

Monika Alcobev share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 26 Oct 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

41 weekly closes from 25 July 2025 to 26 October 2026.

26 Oct 2026: Monika Alcobev closed at ₹127.55, down 13.8% on the week and down 9.5% on the month. Results for January to March 2026: Revenue up 21.1% and profit up 22.2% on a year earlier.

The NSE corporate-actions record has no dividend for Monika Alcobev since its first NSE close in our records (25 July 2025), so this page cannot show amounts per share.

Yes. Monika Alcobev Ltd paid out 7% of its profit as dividends in FY26, and it paid a dividend in 4 of its last 5 reported years.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

Monika Alcobev is not on any of our India lists this week.

Monika Alcobev Ltd earned ₹22.0 Cr of net profit in the Mar 2026 quarter, +22.2% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 2nd quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹32.0 Cr. Over 4 years profit has grown 100.0% a year on average. That is 12.0% of the quarter's revenue.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹32.0 Cr (+39.1% on the year before).

Monika Alcobev Ltd reported ₹184 Cr of revenue in the Mar 2026 quarter, +21.1% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 2nd quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 4 years it has grown 102.1% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹300 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

FY26 revenue was ₹300 Cr, +27.7% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +30.2% on average, against 102.1% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Monika Alcobev Ltd's operating margin was 15.0% in the Mar 2026 quarter, 6.0 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between 15.0% and 20.0%. The latest quarter is within that range.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why: the operating margin move is clear, but the cost details behind it are not in our data, so we show the move without guessing the reason.

Over the last 3 years Monika Alcobev Ltd's operations used more cash than they brought in, so cash conversion was −253%, a gap worth watching. In FY26 its operations used ₹102 Cr of cash, against ₹32.0 Cr of profit. After ₹1.0 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹103 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason.

What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building.

Monika Alcobev Ltd's customer, stock and supplier day counts come out in the thousands of days on sales this small (₹300 Cr in FY26), so no cash-cycle chart is drawn and this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent ₹17.0 Cr on assets over the last 3 years.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

Averaged over those years that is 1.9% of FY26 revenue a year.

Spending on assets: ₹17.0 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹4.0 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹0.0 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns.

Monika Alcobev Ltd's P/E is 8.5×, about the lowest it has ever been. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 19.6×, over 1 year of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +8.0% while the price moved −56.4%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

Monika Alcobev Ltd's business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 4 quarters of 1 measure, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction.

One or more growth lines have an extreme jump caused by comparing with a near-zero or loss-making quarter. Those jumps are capped before reading and drawn at the edge of the chart, so one odd quarter does not decide the result.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Monika Alcobev Ltd earned a ROCE of 15% in FY26. We cannot compare its return on capital used with its cost of capital from the data we have. It comes from a 10.7% net margin and 0.61× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 10.7% net margin × 0.61× asset turnover × 2.02× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 13.2% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it.

Monika Alcobev Ltd had ₹211 Cr of borrowings against ₹244 Cr of equity in FY26, so its debt is 0.86× its equity. Its operating profit is 2 times its interest bill. Over 4 years borrowings went from ₹70.0 Cr to ₹211 Cr. Over the last 3 of those years it spent ₹17.0 Cr on assets.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Interest cover shows how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low debt and high cover are the safe combination.

Part of the spending on assets is being paid for with borrowed money.

Foreign institutions cut their stake in Monika Alcobev Ltd by 3.7 percentage points over 4 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Foreign institutions now own 8.9% of the company. Domestic institutions moved −0.5 points over the same period, to 1.3%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Foreign institutions: −3.7 points over 4 quarters, to 8.9%; Domestic institutions: −0.5 points over 4 quarters, to 1.3%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 4 quarters, to 62.1%.

Why the owners changed: foreign institutions drove it (−3.7 points), together with domestic institutions (−0.5 points). They reduced their stake.

For Monika Alcobev Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

49.9 out of 100, rank 55 of 63 in Trading, with 27% of the evidence available. It is provisional, so it is ranked below companies with full evidence.

Monika Alcobev Ltd scores 49.9 out of 100 against the 63 companies it is compared with in Trading, ranking 55. Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 16.2 + 14.7 + 11.3 + 7.7 = 49.9. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Monika Alcobev ranks 55 of 63 Trading companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 49.9 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Trading, all 63 compared on one page.

Monika Alcobev is the 55th largest of 59 Trading companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Oswal Agro Mills, Susan Electricals India and Magnus Steel & Infra. Just below it: Le Merite Exports, Pramara Promotions and Cropster Agro.

Trading companies close in size

52. Oswal Agro Mills Ltd ₹456 crore
53. Susan Electricals India Ltd ₹447 crore
54. Magnus Steel & Infra Ltd ₹417 crore
55. Monika Alcobev Ltd ₹274 crore
56. Le Merite Exports Ltd ₹264 crore
57. Pramara Promotions Ltd ₹143 crore
58. Cropster Agro Ltd ₹130 crore

All 59 Trading companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

2182. All E Technologies Ltd ₹284 crore
2183. Cool Caps Industries Ltd ₹279 crore
2184. Monika Alcobev Ltd ₹277 crore
2185. Phantom Digital Effects Ltd ₹275 crore
2186. Vishal Nirmiti Ltd ₹275 crore

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 26 October 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.