Borosil share price today

Borosil Ltd's share price was ₹305.95 at the close on 5 November 2026. It has been moving sideways for 4 weeks. That is 16.7% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between ₹219 and ₹339, and at that close it sat 72% of the way up from that low.

A share price tends to move through four phases: moving sideways (stage 1), rising (stage 2), stalling near a high (stage 3) and falling (stage 4). Today Borosil Ltd is in stage 1. The phase helps read everything below.

Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the NIFTY 500, and it has stayed ahead for 17 weeks in a row.

Over the last 6.3 years the share price moved +97% while the NIFTY 500 moved +141%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week.

This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row.

Three changes stood out: revenue up on a year earlier for 9 quarters in a row, best operating margin in 11 quarters and indian funds and insurers (DIIs) raised their stake for 4 quarters in a row.

1. Revenue up on a year earlier for 9 quarters in a row

   In the September 2026 quarter revenue was ₹370 crore, +7.6% on a year earlier.

2. Best operating margin in 11 quarters

   Operating margin was 19% in the September 2026 quarter, against 15% a year earlier.

3. Indian funds and insurers (DIIs) raised their stake for 4 quarters in a row

   From 6.1% to 6.4% of the company by the September 2026 quarter.

For July to September 2026 (the quarter ended 30 September 2026), Borosil reported revenue of ₹370 crore, up 7.6% from ₹344 crore a year earlier, and a profit of ₹32.0 crore, up 39.1% from ₹23.0 crore.

Borosil results: July to September 2026 against a year earlier

The next results, for October to December 2026, are due by 14 February 2027: listed companies must publish quarterly results within 45 days of the quarter's end (60 days for the January to March quarter).

The newest call in our records is from 19 August 2026, about April to June 2026; a call about these results is not in our records yet.

From the company's reported quarterly results (quarter ended 30 September 2026). Revenue and profit in ₹ crore.

Borosil closed at ₹305.95 on 5 November 2026, down 9.8% from ₹339.20 a year earlier (7 November 2025) and up 23.0% over five years. Its highest weekly close since July 2020 was ₹469.85 on 6 December 2024.

Borosil share price: then and now

Weekly closing prices. Each change is the move from that price to the 5 Nov 2026 close. A day's intraday high or low can go beyond these weekly closes.

334 weekly closes from 24 July 2020 to 5 November 2026.

5 Nov 2026: Borosil closed at ₹305.95, up 6.8% on the week and up 13.2% on the month. Results for July to September 2026: Revenue up 7.6% and profit up 39.1% on a year earlier.

Earlier

• 19 Aug 2026: Borosil held its results call for April to June 2026. Management guided: FY27 operating margin about 18%, excluding other income; steady-state business framed at 18%-20% without West Asia impact.

Borosil paid no dividend in the 12 months to 5 November 2026. The last was a dividend of ₹1 a share, ex-date 17 August 2021.

Borosil dividends since 1 April 2021

Amounts as the company declared them on the NSE. A dividend goes to whoever owns the shares before the ex-date. The record date is the same day as the ex-date for every payment here.

Not in its latest year. Borosil Ltd paid out 0% of its profit as dividends in FY26. It did pay a dividend in 1 of its last 9 reported years, so there is a history but no current dividend.

From the NSE corporate-actions record, read 5 November 2026.

On the call for April to June 2026, held on 19 August 2026, Borosil's management guided: FY27 operating margin about 18%, excluding other income; steady-state business framed at 18%-20% without West Asia impact.

“For FY27, it remains at about 18% EBITDA margin.”Ruturaj Sharma, on the call for April to June 2026

What management guided

• FY27 total capital spending ₹125-150 crore, including glassware projects, possible solar and maintenance capital spending; exclusive stores typically require ₹40-50 lakh each.
• FY27 consolidated depreciation approximately ₹92 crore including Stainless.
• FY27 solar operating profit savings about ₹27-28 crore; fuel impact could reduce to ₹1.5 crore per quarter in opalware and ₹0.6-0.7 crore in borosilicate at current prices.
• Third Hydra double-walled line expected to commence production during July to September 2026.

Management’s own plans and goals, from our notes of the call. A plan is not a result.

Source: the call transcript.

From the call for April to June 2026, 19 August 2026. The July to September 2026 results are out since, so this part may be out of date until we update it.

When Borosil reports October to December 2026, these are the 4 checks that show whether the story is still on course. First: Consolidated margin recovery after price realization begins; check whether fuel and packaging relief converts into earnings.

Borosil is not on any of our India lists this week.

Borosil Ltd earned ₹32.0 Cr of net profit in the Sep 2026 quarter, +39.1% on the same quarter a year earlier. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹75.0 Cr. That is 8.6% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹23.0 Cr.

Net profit is what is left after every cost, interest and tax. Earnings per share, dividends and book value all grow from it.

For the full year, FY26 profit was ₹75.0 Cr (+1.4% on the year before).

Why profit moved: revenue changed +7.6% on a year earlier and the margin moved +4.0 percentage points. Most of the change came from keeping more of each sale.

On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −3.9% and revenue +5.9%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth.

Borosil Ltd reported ₹370 Cr of revenue in the Sep 2026 quarter, +7.6% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 9th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 8 years it has grown 35.9% a year on average. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,175 Cr.

Revenue is everything the company billed its customers in the period.

The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,251 Cr.

FY26 revenue was ₹1,175 Cr, +7.8% on the year before.

Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +5.9% on average, against 35.9% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate.

Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +5.6%, against +10.3% a year over the last 8 quarters (rolling over); profit over the last 12 months grew −7.0%, against +7.7% a year (rolling over).

Borosil Ltd's operating margin was 19.0% in the Sep 2026 quarter, 4.0 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Across 9 years it has been between 9.0% and 18.0%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period.

Operating margin is what is left from every ₹100 of sales after the costs of running the business, before interest and tax. It shows pricing power and cost control.

Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +3.6 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +4.5 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged.

Over the last 3 years, 69% of Borosil Ltd's reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so most of the profit is real cash. In FY26 it brought in ₹119 Cr of operating cash against ₹75.0 Cr of profit.

The profit and loss account shows what was earned. The cash-flow statement shows the cash that actually came in. Comparing operating cash flow with profit is one of the best checks that a profit is real.

After ₹122 Cr of spending on assets, free cash was −₹3.0 Cr: it spent more than its operations brought in.

Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year.

Why 69% of profit came in as cash: the cash cycle got 73 days longer between FY21 and FY26, so more of each rupee of profit waits in the business before it arrives. When less than 70% of profit comes in as cash, it is the thing to watch on this page.

What to look at next: less of the profit turns into cash than it should, and the cash cycle is 73 days longer. The next section looks at where the cash is stuck.

Borosil Ltd's cash cycle, the days between paying suppliers and getting paid by customers, was 259 days in FY26, up from 186 days in FY21. It spent ₹464 Cr on assets over the last 3 years. Customers take 33 days to pay, and stock sits for 282 days on average.

Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid. Debtor days: how long customers take to pay. Inventory days: how long stock sits. The cash cycle: the whole loop, in days of sales.

At FY26 sales of ₹1,175 Cr, each day of that cycle ties up about ₹3.2 Cr, so roughly ₹834 Cr is tied up in the business at any time.

FY26: customers took 33 days to pay and stock sat for 282 days, about 9.3 months of sales sitting as stock, for a full cycle of 259 days, longer than FY21's 186.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0. Stock sits for 282 days. Customers pay about 33 days after that. Suppliers are paid at 56 days. Together that makes the 259-day cycle.

Spending on assets: ₹464 Cr over the last 3 years, against ₹222 Cr of depreciation (the yearly wear and tear on existing assets). So it is building well beyond replacing what wears out. Work still in progress is ₹105 Cr (FY26): assets paid for that are not earning yet.

In short: cash is getting stuck in the daily cycle, so watch the cycle more than the profit.

Borosil Ltd's P/E is 44.5×, in the middle of its own history: higher than 39% of past readings. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 50.9×, over 6.3 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth.

P/E is the share price divided by a year's profit per share: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee of yearly profit.

The P/E here, and its history, use a profit figure that can leave out one-off items, so it can differ from a P/E worked out on the quarterly results. Those results' earnings per share for the four quarters to Sep 2026 add up to ₹6.63.

Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +0.5% while the price moved −9.8%. Earnings did better than the price, which pulled the multiple down within its own range.

Where the price move came from: over 5 years the price moved +4.2% a year; about +11.2% a year came from earnings growth and about −7.0 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple.

In short: the multiple is about average against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple.

The PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 613% on reported income across 15 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Borosil Ltd's business is getting worse. Profit and EPS growth are shrinking: profit growth is −7.0% in the latest quarter, against +56.8% at its best in 12 quarters, with ROCE steady at 11.0%. This is based on 9 quarters of 4 measures, with some gaps.

Every business is somewhere on a path of getting better or worse, and this section names where. The last 12 quarters of growth in revenue, profit and earnings per share, plus the return the business earns on its capital, are read as lines. Getting worse: the lines are falling. Turning around: a low point has just formed and the last few quarters are rising from it. Getting better: the rise from the low has lasted. Growing steadily: steady growth with healthy returns. Slowing from a peak: still high, but slowing. When the lines disagree the result is mixed; too little history means no reading. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the steady yearly rate that would turn the starting value into the latest one. It is the fairest way to compare growth over different periods. If the 1-year figure is much bigger than the 10-year one, recent growth is running faster than the long-run trend. A dash means there is no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss, where a growth rate means nothing.

Why it matters: falling lines mean any ratio below that looks low should be read with that direction in mind.

The return figures here are yearly, not quarterly. They show level and direction only; they can support the growth lines but never decide the reading alone.

This reading has some gaps: at least one line is short, or the return line is not the quarterly series, so treat it with a little more caution.

Compound annual growth rate (%)

Compound annual growth rate over each period, %. Revenue, profit and EPS come from yearly figures; the share price row is price growth over the same periods. A dash means no figure for that period, or the starting year was a loss.

Borosil Ltd earned a ROCE of 11% in FY26. That is up from a low of 6% in FY23. We cannot compare its return on capital used with its cost of capital from the data we have. It comes from a 6.4% net margin and 0.92× asset turnover (sales divided by assets).

Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it, from shareholders and lenders together. It is the best single test of whether growth adds value or just size.

Why the return is what it is (FY26): a 6.4% net margin × 0.92× asset turnover × 1.45× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 8.5% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing plays a small part, so this return is earned, not borrowed.

The quarterly return lines and the return-on-capital-used (ROIC) line, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 613% on reported income across 15 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Borosil Ltd had ₹148 Cr of borrowings against ₹887 Cr of equity in FY26, so its debt is 0.17× its equity. Its operating profit is 24 times its interest bill. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹7.0 Cr to ₹148 Cr. Over the last 3 of those years it spent ₹464 Cr on assets.

Debt-to-equity shows how much of the business is paid for with borrowed money. Interest cover shows how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low debt and high cover are the safe combination.

Part of the spending on assets is being paid for with borrowed money.

The total-debt and debt-to-equity series, which only the second data source has, are not shown on this page: its two data sources disagree by up to 613% on reported income across 15 comparable periods. When two sources disagree on a figure, we leave it out on purpose. The gap is a choice, not missing data.

Domestic institutions raised their stake in Borosil Ltd by 1.3 percentage points over 8 quarters, the biggest change among its owners. Domestic institutions now own 6.4% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −0.5 points over the same period, to 0.4%. This uses the four owner groups that companies report every quarter; nothing is guessed between filings.

Who owns the company each quarter: promoters (the founders or controlling owners), foreign institutions, domestic institutions such as mutual funds, and the public. When people close to the business steadily raise their stake, that is worth noticing; a quiet list is also an answer.

Over the last two years: Domestic institutions: +1.3 points over 8 quarters, to 6.4%; Foreign institutions: −0.5 points over 8 quarters, to 0.4%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters, to 64.7%.

Why the owners changed: domestic institutions drove it (+1.3 points), with the other side taken by foreign institutions (−0.5 points). They raised their stake step by step.

For Borosil Ltd, the Z-score is not available, so we say so rather than guess one. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections show the balance-sheet figures we do have, each with its own date.

The Z-score estimates how far a company is from balance-sheet trouble. Above about 3 is safe; below about 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not used for banks and lenders.

58.7 out of 100, rank 1 of 3 in Opalware, with 79% of the evidence available.

Borosil Ltd scores 58.7 out of 100 against the 3 companies it is compared with in Opalware, ranking 1. Relative strength against the index is 16.9%, and revenue and profit growth are weak.

The four parts add up to the total exactly: 14.7 + 12.9 + 11.1 + 20 = 58.7. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here.

What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector.

Borosil ranks 1 of 3 Opalware companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 58.7 out of 100.

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.

The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section.

Related companies: Opalware, all 3 compared on one page.

Borosil is the 2nd largest of 3 Opalware companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 30 October 2026). Just above it: Cello World. Just below it: La Opala RG.

Opalware companies close in size

1. Cello World Ltd ₹7,391 crore
2. Borosil Ltd ₹3,658 crore
3. La Opala RG Ltd ₹1,568 crore

All 3 Opalware companies, largest first

Companies close in size in other industries

965. Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd ₹3,693 crore · Sugar
966. Afcom Holdings Ltd ₹3,664 crore · Air Transport Service
967. Borosil Ltd ₹3,658 crore
968. Network People Services Technologies Ltd ₹3,657 crore · IT Product Companies
969. Steamhouse India Ltd ₹3,655 crore

Sector Alpha, written by code from the published numbers. Data as of 5 November 2026.

Every chart on this page is drawn by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions.

See the plain-text version of this page.