GMM Pfaudler Ltd · GMMPFAUDLR
—
—
—
—
—
₹792 Cr
₹866 Cr
₹912 Cr
₹937 Cr
₹856 Cr
₹741 Cr
₹785 Cr
₹805 Cr
₹801 Cr
₹807 Cr
₹795 Cr
₹902 Cr
₹884 Cr
₹944 Cr
₹925 Cr
20-quarter listed-company comparison
Glass - Others Stocks in India
Glass - Others: GMM Pfaudler Ltd owns the largest revenue base; HLE Glascoat Ltd has the fastest current growth.
01 · the index people search for
Nifty Glass - Others Index — Constituents & Performance
All 2 listed Indian Glass - Others companies are named here, largest first — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Glass - Others index. Every figure on this page is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.
- GMM Pfaudler Ltd₹4.7K Cr
- HLE Glascoat Ltd₹2.3K Cr
02 · sector relative strength, before individual stocks
Is Glass - Others outperforming NIFTY 500?
Glass - Others has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 17.3% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 8.2%. 1 of 2 covered companies currently beats NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. GMM Pfaudler Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +10.6%.
+8.2%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
-17.3%Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
1/2Stocks leading NIFTY 500
1/2Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Glass - Others has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 17.3% over 52 weeks and 8.2% over 13 weeks. 1 of 2 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 2 beat the sector itself. GMM Pfaudler Ltd leads with revenue of ₹3,655 crore, based on 2 of 2 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Companies
2
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹7.0K Cr
GMM Pfaudler Ltd
Revenue growing
2/2
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
1/2
positive Mansfield relative strength
Comparing 2 of 2
03 · research priority, made explicit
Best Glass - Others Stocks in India (Aug 2026), Ranked by Data
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
GMM Pfaudler Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 79.3% evidence confidence.
How this score is built, and what the marks mean
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step curve the sector itself is placed on — basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep — read from how many weeks running it has led NIFTY 500 and whether that lead is widening or shrinking. It describes where the PRICE stands, not the earnings trajectory and not a recommendation, and it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read.
Top 10 Glass - Others Stocks in India
| Company | Score | Price stage | Growth & earnings/35 | Capital efficiency/25 | Valuation/20 | Relative strength/20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1GMM Pfaudler LtdGMMPFAUDLR | 62.7/100Mixed-positive evidence79% evidence | TURNING | 21.0/35 Revenue 13.9% · PAT 75.7% · OPM change -3 pp 95% evidence | 11.6/25 ROCE 13.6% · OPM 10% 76% evidence | 10.4/20 P/E 37.4× · PEG — 35% evidence | 19.7/20 RS sector 10.6% · RS bench 4.4% · 1Y -18.7%2 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 21 + 11.6 + 10.4 + 19.7 = 62.7 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
| 2HLE Glascoat LtdHLEGLAS | 34.5/100Adverse evidence79% evidence | ASLEEP | 12.8/35 Revenue 26.3% · PAT -45.1% · OPM change -6.3 pp 95% evidence | 10.4/25 ROCE 11.8% · OPM 7% 76% evidence | 11.3/20 P/E 57.8× · PEG — 35% evidence | 0.0/20 RS sector -16% · RS bench -21.5% · 1Y -23.5%10 of 12 weeks ahead 100% evidence |
| Exact sum: 12.8 + 10.4 + 11.3 + 0 = 34.5 · Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction. | ||||||
04 · what price has already done
Market action
GMM Pfaudler Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Glass - Others at -18.7%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +4.4%. 1 of 2 covered companies is above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-08-14.
Price and relative strength
Every company, the sector's own index and NIFTY 500 all start level on the left edge of the window, so only the distance between the lines counts — the highest line has risen the most since then, and the chart at the top of this page is drawn the same way. It opens on one year; the buttons beside it stretch that to three or five.
How far ahead of or behind NIFTY 500 each company has been running, measured against its own recent average of that comparison, so the flat line at zero IS NIFTY 500: above it the company is beating the market, below it the market is beating the company. It opens on one year.
The same measure taken against Glass - Others itself instead of the whole market, so the flat line at zero is the sector: above it the company is beating its own peers, which is the sharper test of the two. It opens on one year.
05 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
GMM Pfaudler Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 2 Glass - Others companies compared here, at ₹3,655 crore. HLE Glascoat Ltd is next at ₹1,370 crore. HLE Glascoat Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 26.3%, so level and change sit with different companies. 2 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: GMM Pfaudler Ltd is the scale leader at ₹3,655 crore, 166.8% ahead of HLE Glascoat Ltd. HLE Glascoat Ltd's growth is 26.3% from a ₹1,370 crore base, with 15 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderGMM Pfaudler Ltd · ₹3,655 crore
Gap166.8% versus #2 · HLE Glascoat Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/2 companies · 30 observations
Investor read: GMM Pfaudler Ltd is the scale benchmark; HLE Glascoat Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: GMM Pfaudler Ltd's growth falls below HLE Glascoat Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenue · company comparison
2/2 level · 2/2 change
On every company-comparison chart on this page: solid lines show level, dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected, and a missing report breaks the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
In every all-company table on this page, each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above them use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| GMM Pfaudler Ltd GMMPFAUDLR | ₹925 Cr | 16% | Jun 2026 |
| HLE Glascoat Ltd HLEGLAS | ₹301 Cr | 5.9% | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
HLE Glascoat Ltd · HLEGLAS
—
—
—
—
—
₹214 Cr
₹298 Cr
₹197 Cr
₹224 Cr
₹239 Cr
₹307 Cr
₹227 Cr
₹236 Cr
₹231 Cr
₹334 Cr
₹284 Cr
₹351 Cr
₹327 Cr
₹392 Cr
₹301 Cr
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
GMM Pfaudler Ltd · GMMPFAUDLR
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
8.0%
-14%
-14%
-14%
-6.4%
8.9%
1.3%
12%
10%
17%
16%
HLE Glascoat Ltd · HLEGLAS
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
12%
3.0%
15%
5.1%
-3.4%
8.7%
25%
49%
41%
17%
5.9%
06 · compare level, then change
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
GMM Pfaudler Ltd has the highest OPM among the 2 Glass - Others companies compared here, at 10%. HLE Glascoat Ltd is next at 7%. The same company also holds the highest Margin change, at -3 percentage points. 2 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: GMM Pfaudler Ltd leads both opm at 10% and margin change at -3 percentage points.
LeaderGMM Pfaudler Ltd · 10%
Gap43.7% versus #2 · HLE Glascoat Ltd
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/2 companies · 40 observations
Investor read: GMM Pfaudler Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
Operating margin · company comparison
2/2 level · 2/2 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| GMM Pfaudler Ltd GMMPFAUDLR | 10% | −3.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| HLE Glascoat Ltd HLEGLAS | 7.0% | −6.3 pp | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
GMM Pfaudler Ltd · GMMPFAUDLR
14%
13%
10%
13%
15%
15%
11%
14%
15%
13%
12%
11%
12%
12%
10%
13%
13%
12%
8.0%
10%
HLE Glascoat Ltd · HLEGLAS
18%
17%
15%
14%
16%
12%
15%
12%
12%
10%
12%
9.6%
14%
11%
16%
13%
11%
6.5%
11%
7.0%
Margin change · reported quarter history
GMM Pfaudler Ltd · GMMPFAUDLR
−6.7 pp
−8.0 pp
+3.8 pp
+6.7 pp
+0.8 pp
+2.1 pp
+0.7 pp
+0.8 pp
−0.2 pp
−1.9 pp
+1.0 pp
−3.0 pp
−3.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−2.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−3.0 pp
HLE Glascoat Ltd · HLEGLAS
+0.4 pp
−5.3 pp
−2.8 pp
−5.4 pp
−1.7 pp
−4.6 pp
−0.2 pp
−1.9 pp
−4.5 pp
−1.7 pp
−3.1 pp
−2.1 pp
+2.7 pp
+0.8 pp
+3.7 pp
+3.6 pp
−3.6 pp
−4.6 pp
−4.7 pp
−6.3 pp
07 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
GMM Pfaudler Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 2 Glass - Others companies compared here, at ₹65 crore. HLE Glascoat Ltd is next at ₹41 crore. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at 75.7%. 2 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: GMM Pfaudler Ltd leads with ₹65 crore of TTM profit, 59.3% above HLE Glascoat Ltd. GMM Pfaudler Ltd shows 75.7% growth from a ₹65 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderGMM Pfaudler Ltd · ₹65 crore
Gap59.3% versus #2 · HLE Glascoat Ltd
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/2 companies · 30 observations
Investor read: GMM Pfaudler Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profit · company comparison
2/2 level · 2/2 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| GMM Pfaudler Ltd GMMPFAUDLR | ₹22 Cr | 120% | Jun 2026 |
| HLE Glascoat Ltd HLEGLAS | ₹2 Cr | -89% | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
GMM Pfaudler Ltd · GMMPFAUDLR
—
—
—
—
—
₹19 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹67 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹40 Cr
₹-28 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹-11 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹22 Cr
HLE Glascoat Ltd · HLEGLAS
—
—
—
—
—
₹12 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹9 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹6 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹2 Cr
Profit growth · reported quarter history
GMM Pfaudler Ltd · GMMPFAUDLR
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
50%
-24%
-56%
-78%
43%
-212%
-55%
160%
-128%
—
120%
HLE Glascoat Ltd · HLEGLAS
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-51%
-36%
-42%
33%
72%
114%
230%
-3.2%
-55%
-36%
-89%
08 · compare level, then change
Return On Capital Employed
GMM Pfaudler Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 2 Glass - Others companies compared here, at 13.6%. HLE Glascoat Ltd is next at 11.8%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +1 percentage points. 2 of 2 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: GMM Pfaudler Ltd leads ROCE at 13.6%, 1.8 percentage points above HLE Glascoat Ltd. GMM Pfaudler Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +1 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderGMM Pfaudler Ltd · 13.6%
Gap15.3% versus #2 · HLE Glascoat Ltd
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage2/2 companies · 0 observations
Investor read: GMM Pfaudler Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
Return on capital · company comparison
2/2 level · 2/2 change
Withheld from this chart: GMM Pfaudler Ltd (GMMPFAUDLR) — its two data sources disagree by up to 27% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; HLE Glascoat Ltd (HLEGLAS) — its two data sources disagree by up to 48% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| GMM Pfaudler Ltd GMMPFAUDLR | 14% | +1.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
| HLE Glascoat Ltd HLEGLAS | 12% | −1.0 pp | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
No consistent historical series is available for roce.
No consistent historical series is available for roce change.
09 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
No company in this Glass - Others comparison reports a valuation figure this section can compare, so the PEG rank is empty. On P/E, GMM Pfaudler Ltd is lowest at 37.4×, across 2 of 2 companies with a usable reading. PEG asks what price is being paid for growth; P/E keeps that answer anchored to the actual earnings multiple.
What the numbers say: There is not enough comparable evidence to name a reliable peg leader.
LeaderNo comparable leader
GapNot enough peers
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage0/2 companies · 0 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data feeds agreed. Where any of that fails the ratio is left out rather than printed: a P/E divided by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, is a number that looks precise and means nothing.
PEGlowest PEG
—Not enough comparable data—
Valuation · company comparison
0/2 level · 2/2 change
All-company data · latest reported quarter
| Company | PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| GMM Pfaudler Ltd GMMPFAUDLR | — | 31.8 | Jun 2026 |
| HLE Glascoat Ltd HLEGLAS | — | 49.3 | Jun 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
No consistent historical series is available for peg.
P/E · reported quarter history
GMM Pfaudler Ltd · GMMPFAUDLR
77.7
77.1
63.5
69.6
66.8
44.1
41.9
40.7
49.5
42.0
32.5
33.8
43.2
56.2
42.3
55.5
56.3
43.9
33.1
31.8
HLE Glascoat Ltd · HLEGLAS
139.1
124.8
135.1
70.7
73.6
64.0
48.5
63.3
60.2
66.3
59.2
96.7
96.7
85.3
49.3
67.8
57.4
53.0
34.0
49.3
10 · before the conclusion, check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Glass - Others comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 2 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 2 have second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree. 1 of the 5 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 2 companies are missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
- Thin comparisons: Valuation have fewer than three usable current readings.
11 · evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 2 Glass - Others companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-08-14. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-08-14 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes and PEG are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing0 cross-checked · 0 unverified · 2 withheld, of 2 graded companies.
How a second data feed is admitted, and what happens when it disagrees
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from.
12 · questions investors ask, short speakable answers
Glass - Others company comparison FAQs
These 21 answers restate the Glass - Others comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 2 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-08-14. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Is the Glass - Others sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
Glass - Others has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 17.3% over 52 weeks and 8.2% over 13 weeks. 1 of 2 covered companies beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, while 1 of 2 beat the sector itself.
Which Glass - Others company is largest by revenue?
GMM Pfaudler Ltd leads with revenue of ₹3,655 crore, based on 2 of 2 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which Glass - Others company is growing fastest?
HLE Glascoat Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 26.3%, across 2 of 2 comparable companies.
Which Glass - Others company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
GMM Pfaudler Ltd ranks first at 62.7/100 with 79.3% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
How much history does this Glass - Others comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, returns and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Is there a Nifty Glass - Others index?
NSE India maintains Nifty indices for several broad sector categories — Nifty Bank, Nifty IT, Nifty Pharma and others — but not for every sub-sector grouping on this site. Whether or not an official Nifty index covers Glass - Others, this page builds its own equal-weight basket of 2 listed Glass - Others companies — one company, one vote, regardless of market value — so no single large company dominates the reading. Figures are as of Jun 2026.
Which are the best Glass - Others stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, GMM Pfaudler Ltd places first among 2 listed Glass - Others companies, followed by HLE Glascoat Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many Glass - Others stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 2 listed Glass - Others companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.
Which Glass - Others company is the biggest?
GMM Pfaudler Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹3,655 crore, ahead of HLE Glascoat Ltd at ₹1,370 crore. That covers 2 of 2 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which Glass - Others company has the best profit margins?
GMM Pfaudler Ltd has the highest operating margin at 10%, from 2 of 2 comparable companies. GMM Pfaudler Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at -3 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Glass - Others company makes the most profit?
GMM Pfaudler Ltd earns the most, at ₹65 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 2 of 2 comparable companies. GMM Pfaudler Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 75.7%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Glass - Others company earns the highest return on capital?
GMM Pfaudler Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 13.6%, across 2 of 2 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Is the Glass - Others sector beating the market?
Glass - Others has underperformed NIFTY 500 by 17.3% over the last 52 weeks and 8.2% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 1 of 2 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Glass - Others stock has the strongest price momentum?
GMM Pfaudler Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Glass - Others company scores highest for research priority?
GMM Pfaudler Ltd scores 62.7 out of 100 with 79.3% evidence confidence, from 21 points on growth and earnings, 11.6 on capital efficiency, 10.4 on valuation and 19.7 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Glass - Others companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 2 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Glass - Others sector?
The 2 Glass - Others companies on this page carry ₹6,989 crore of combined market value. GMM Pfaudler Ltd is the largest at ₹4,713 crore, about 67% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-08-20.
How is the Glass - Others sector performing?
1 of the 2 covered Glass - Others companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 17.3% behind NIFTY 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-08-20.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.