Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-29
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs Stocks in India

Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs: Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd has the fastest current growth.

Nifty Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs Index — Constituents & Performance

The Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies below are the listed Indian Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.

The sector itself · before any single company

How has Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs moved against NIFTY 500?

The line below covers 5.1 years. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 156% ahead of NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies fell 1% on average over the last four reported quarters.

FADING · −1 in 4w~Price up, without the fundamentals confirming1 of 4 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 1/4 >200d (−1) · 1/4 lead (−1) · EPS 2/4↑

200500100020005000202620252024202320222021 8154335 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100342Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Jun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 101, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 104, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 116, against 100 at the start · up 16.3% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 126, against 100 at the start · up 26.3% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 137, against 100 at the start · up 36.8% on a year ago · 3 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 163, against 100 at the start · up 73.0% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 168, against 100 at the start · up 91.8% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 176, against 100 at the start · up 93.6% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 180, against 100 at the start · up 41.7% on a year ago · 3 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 241, against 100 at the start · up 24.6% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 256, against 100 at the start · down 2.1% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 281, against 100 at the start · down 9.2% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 315, against 100 at the start · down 9.0% on a year ago · 3 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 342, against 100 at the start · up 14.4% on a year ago · 3 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two342 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
200500100020005000202620252024202320222021 8154335 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100342Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Jun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 101, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 104, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 116, against 100 at the start · up 16.3% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 126, against 100 at the start · up 26.3% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 137, against 100 at the start · up 36.8% on a year ago · 3 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 163, against 100 at the start · up 73.0% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 168, against 100 at the start · up 91.8% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 176, against 100 at the start · up 93.6% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 180, against 100 at the start · up 41.7% on a year ago · 3 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 241, against 100 at the start · up 24.6% on a year ago · 3 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 256, against 100 at the start · down 2.1% on a year ago · 3 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 281, against 100 at the start · down 9.2% on a year ago · 3 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 315, against 100 at the start · down 9.0% on a year ago · 3 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 342, against 100 at the start · up 14.4% on a year ago · 3 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two342No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs, equal-weighted, based at 200 NIFTY 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling
Strength anatomy NarrowHow much of the sector is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together1 of 4 stocks moving
Fresh0 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score −14 vs the sector average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large 0/10
Mid 0/2−1
Small 1/10

Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 4 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

Sector relative strength · before individual stocks

Is Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs outperforming NIFTY 500?

The 52-week comparison of Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs against NIFTY 500 is not available from the current market series. 1 of 4 covered companies currently beats NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at -14.6%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.

Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
1/4Stocks leading NIFTY 500
0/4Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: 15.3 as of 2026-07-19 · CONSOLIDATION · falling.

The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 1 of 4 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500. Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd leads with revenue of ₹13,006 crore, based on 4 of 4 comparable companies through Mar 2026. Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 4 of 4 comparable companies.

Is the Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs sector outperforming NIFTY 500?

The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 1 of 4 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs company is largest by revenue?

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd leads with revenue of ₹13,006 crore, based on 4 of 4 comparable companies through Mar 2026.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs company is growing fastest?

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 100%, across 4 of 4 comparable companies.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd ranks first at 77.6/100 with 97% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs company has the least gross debt?

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd has the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹37 crore. Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd has the highest at ₹2,788 crore.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs company has the lowest comparable PEG?

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.93, among 3 of 4 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.

How much history does this Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Mar 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Companies
4
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹1.7 L Cr
Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd
Revenue growing
4/4
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
1/4
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 97% evidence confidence.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.

1. Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

77.6/100 · Favorable setup · 97% evidence

Exact sum: 35 + 22 + 12.4 + 8.2 = 77.6

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

35.0/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 37.9% · PAT 41.9% · OPM change 4 pp

100% evidence

22.0/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 43% · debt/equity 0.01×

100% evidence

12.4/20Valuation

P/E 39.3× · PEG 0.93

85% evidence

8.2/20Relative strength

RS sector -14.6% · RS bench -0.5% · 1Y -1.4%

100% evidence

2. Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

53.4/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 97% evidence

Exact sum: 20.5 + 20.4 + 6.5 + 6 = 53.4

Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.

20.5/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 13.8% · PAT 14.2% · OPM change 10 pp

100% evidence

20.4/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 36% · debt/equity 0.05×

100% evidence

6.5/20Valuation

P/E 35.8× · PEG 2.15

85% evidence

6.0/20Relative strength

RS sector -23.2% · RS bench -9.7% · 1Y -21.4%

100% evidence

3. Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd · SWANDEF

37.0/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 63% evidence

Exact sum: 18.4 + 0.6 + 10 + 8 = 37

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

18.4/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 100% · PAT -25.6% · OPM change 86 pp

71% evidence

0.6/25Capital efficiency

ROCE -7.5% · debt/equity 39.83×

95% evidence

10.0/20Valuation

P/E — · PEG —

0% evidence

8.0/20Relative strength

RS sector -43.4% · RS bench 55.5% · 1Y 626.2%

70% evidence

4. Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

35.8/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 84% evidence

Exact sum: 11.5 + 16.3 + 5 + 3 = 35.8

Decision use: Strong business, demanding price: keep it on the quality list, but require either earnings upgrades or valuation compression.

11.5/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 4.2% · PAT -13.3% · OPM change 6 pp

100% evidence

16.3/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 16% · debt/equity 0.28×

100% evidence

5.0/20Valuation

P/E 51.1× · PEG 8.23

50% evidence

3.0/20Relative strength

RS sector -39.6% · RS bench -13.1% · 1Y -24.9%

70% evidence

01 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 4 Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies compared here, at ₹13,006 crore. Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd is next at ₹7,002 crore. Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd is the scale leader at ₹13,006 crore, 85.7% ahead of Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd. Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd's growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap; the uncapped TTM change is 3928.6% from a ₹282 crore base, with 18 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderMazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · ₹13,006 crore
Gap85.7% versus #2 · Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 78 observations

Investor read: Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd is the scale benchmark; Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd's growth falls below Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK₹13.0K Cr
2Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE₹7.0K Cr
3Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP₹5.0K Cr
4Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF₹282 Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF100%
2Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE38%
3Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK14%
4Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP4.2%
Revenue · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK₹3.9K Cr21%Mar 2026
Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE₹2.1K Cr29%Mar 2026
Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP₹1.5K Cr-16%Mar 2026
Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF₹236 Cr4,620%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

₹329 Cr
₹696 Cr
₹953 Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹441 Cr
₹683 Cr
₹642 Cr
₹600 Cr
₹476 Cr
₹1.0K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹771 Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.8K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹1.5K Cr

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

₹304 Cr
₹422 Cr
₹487 Cr
₹542 Cr
₹580 Cr
₹682 Cr
₹699 Cr
₹601 Cr
₹756 Cr
₹898 Cr
₹923 Cr
₹1.0K Cr
₹1.0K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹1.6K Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.9K Cr
₹2.1K Cr

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

₹1.2K Cr
₹1.6K Cr
₹1.6K Cr
₹1.4K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.8K Cr
₹2.1K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
₹1.8K Cr
₹2.4K Cr
₹3.1K Cr
₹2.4K Cr
₹2.8K Cr
₹3.1K Cr
₹3.2K Cr
₹2.6K Cr
₹2.9K Cr
₹3.6K Cr
₹3.9K Cr

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd · SWANDEF

₹5 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹4 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹40 Cr
₹6 Cr
₹236 Cr

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

34%
-1.9%
-33%
-51%
7.9%
48%
64%
114%
62%
13%
8.7%
37%
39%
-2.1%
18%
-16%

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

91%
62%
44%
11%
30%
32%
32%
69%
34%
28%
38%
62%
30%
45%
49%
29%

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

84%
8.4%
17%
49%
-2.6%
7.4%
30%
49%
8.5%
51%
33%
2.3%
11%
6.2%
15%
21%

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd · SWANDEF

-100%
-100%
-75%
-100%
-100%
3,900%
500%
4,620%
02 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Cochin Shipyard Ltd has the highest OPM among the 4 Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies compared here, at 21%. Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd is next at 17%. Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd has the highest Margin change at +86 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Cochin Shipyard Ltd leads opm at 21%; Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd leads margin change at +86 percentage points.

LeaderCochin Shipyard Ltd · 21%
Gap23.5% versus #2 · Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 67 observations

Investor read: Cochin Shipyard Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP21%
2Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE17%
3Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK14%
4Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF-106%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF+86.0 pp
2Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK+10.0 pp
3Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP+6.0 pp
4Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE+4.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP21%+6.0 ppMar 2026
Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE17%+4.0 ppMar 2026
Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK14%+10.0 ppMar 2026
Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF-106%+86.0 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

6.4%
24%
15%
24%
7.2%
20%
23%
-11%
17%
19%
29%
22%
23%
17%
21%
15%
23%
7.0%
14%
21%

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

0.6%
13%
11%
6.0%
5.8%
7.1%
7.0%
3.0%
6.0%
5.0%
5.0%
9.0%
6.0%
6.0%
6.0%
13%
9.0%
9.0%
9.0%
17%

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

5.8%
5.4%
13%
5.5%
7.8%
6.9%
16%
10%
8.0%
10%
23%
17%
27%
19%
26%
4.0%
11%
24%
25%
14%

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd · SWANDEF

-515%
-475%
-868%
-192%
-19%
-341%
-106%

Margin change · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

+1.4 pp
+4.6 pp
−27.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+0.8 pp
−3.8 pp
+8.2 pp
−35.4 pp
+9.9 pp
−0.8 pp
+6.0 pp
+33.0 pp
+6.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−8.0 pp
−7.0 pp
0.0 pp
−10.0 pp
−7.0 pp
+6.0 pp

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

+37.4 pp
+0.7 pp
−1.0 pp
−3.4 pp
+5.1 pp
−5.9 pp
−3.6 pp
−3.0 pp
+0.2 pp
−2.1 pp
−2.0 pp
+6.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+4.0 pp

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

+1.6 pp
−1.2 pp
+6.7 pp
+1.7 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.5 pp
+3.0 pp
+4.5 pp
+0.2 pp
+3.1 pp
+7.0 pp
+7.0 pp
+19.0 pp
+9.0 pp
+3.0 pp
−13.0 pp
−16.0 pp
+5.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+10.0 pp

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd · SWANDEF

−2,855.2 pp
−2,894.9 pp
−893.0 pp
−3,076.2 pp
−1,172.0 pp
−327.8 pp
+738.2 pp
+1,383.0 pp
−5,440.7 pp
+3,531.0 pp
+2,818.0 pp
+86.0 pp
03 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 4 Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies compared here, at ₹2,755 crore. Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd is next at ₹748 crore. Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd has the highest Profit growth at 41.9%, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd leads with ₹2,755 crore of TTM profit, 268.3% above Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd. Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd shows 41.9% growth from a ₹748 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderMazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · ₹2,755 crore
Gap268.3% versus #2 · Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 78 observations

Investor read: Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK₹2.8K Cr
2Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE₹748 Cr
3Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP₹717 Cr
4Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF₹-226 Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE42%
2Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK14%
3Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP-13%
Net profit · company comparison
4/4 level · 3/4 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK₹674 Cr107%Mar 2026
Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE₹303 Cr24%Mar 2026
Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP₹276 Cr-3.8%Mar 2026
Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF₹-142 CrMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

₹29 Cr
₹131 Cr
₹129 Cr
₹275 Cr
₹42 Cr
₹113 Cr
₹110 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹99 Cr
₹182 Cr
₹244 Cr
₹259 Cr
₹174 Cr
₹189 Cr
₹177 Cr
₹287 Cr
₹188 Cr
₹108 Cr
₹145 Cr
₹276 Cr

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

₹21 Cr
₹59 Cr
₹63 Cr
₹47 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹59 Cr
₹64 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹77 Cr
₹81 Cr
₹88 Cr
₹112 Cr
₹87 Cr
₹98 Cr
₹98 Cr
₹244 Cr
₹120 Cr
₹154 Cr
₹171 Cr
₹303 Cr

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

₹102 Cr
₹135 Cr
₹215 Cr
₹159 Cr
₹225 Cr
₹214 Cr
₹354 Cr
₹326 Cr
₹314 Cr
₹333 Cr
₹627 Cr
₹663 Cr
₹696 Cr
₹585 Cr
₹807 Cr
₹325 Cr
₹452 Cr
₹749 Cr
₹880 Cr
₹674 Cr

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd · SWANDEF

₹-525 Cr
₹-515 Cr
₹-537 Cr
₹-527 Cr
₹-538 Cr
₹-26 Cr
₹-25 Cr
₹-30 Cr
₹-27 Cr
₹-39 Cr
₹-51 Cr
₹-53 Cr
₹-53 Cr
₹-23 Cr
₹-31 Cr
₹-20 Cr
₹-33 Cr
₹-142 Cr

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

45%
-14%
-15%
-86%
136%
61%
122%
564%
76%
3.9%
-27%
11%
8.1%
-43%
-18%
-3.8%

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

138%
0.0%
1.6%
17%
54%
37%
38%
104%
13%
21%
11%
118%
38%
57%
74%
24%

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

121%
59%
65%
105%
40%
56%
77%
103%
122%
76%
29%
-51%
-35%
28%
9.1%
107%
04 · not available

Capacity Spending & Returns On It

No company in this Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs comparison reports capital expenditure on a comparable basis, so there is nothing to rank here — 0 of 4 companies have a usable current reading. The section is shown rather than removed so an unavailable metric is not mistaken for one that was quietly left out. Filings were read through Mar 2026.

CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
05 · compare level, then change

Debt Load & Balance-Sheet Headroom

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd has the lowest Gross debt among the 4 Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies compared here, at ₹37 crore. Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd is next at ₹447 crore. Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd has the lowest Net debt at ₹12,649 crore net cash, so level and change sit with different companies.

What the numbers say: Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with ₹12,649 crore net cash and gross debt of ₹447 crore. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.

LeaderGarden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · ₹37 crore
Gap91.7% versus #2 · Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 72 observations

Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.

This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.

Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE₹37 Cr
2Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK₹447 Cr
3Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP₹1.7K Cr
4Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF₹2.8K Cr
Net debtlowest net debt
1Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK₹-12.6K Cr
2Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE₹-3.4K Cr
3Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP₹-734 Cr
4Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF₹2.5K Cr
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyGross debtNet debtReported
Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF₹2.8K Cr₹2.5K CrMar 2026
Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP₹1.7K Cr₹-734 CrMar 2026
Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK₹447 Cr₹-12.6K CrMar 2026
Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE₹37 Cr₹-3.4K CrMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Gross debt · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

₹517 Cr
₹538 Cr
₹538 Cr
₹554 Cr
₹551 Cr
₹554 Cr
₹554 Cr
₹587 Cr
₹587 Cr
₹606 Cr
₹606 Cr
₹502 Cr
₹502 Cr
₹501 Cr
₹501 Cr
₹560 Cr
₹560 Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.7K Cr

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

₹8 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹312 Cr
₹312 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹66 Cr
₹66 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹37 Cr

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

₹27 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹9 Cr
₹9 Cr
₹6 Cr
₹6 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹447 Cr

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd · SWANDEF

₹15.4K Cr
₹2.1K Cr
₹2.1K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
₹2.4K Cr
₹2.4K Cr
₹2.5K Cr
₹2.5K Cr
₹2.6K Cr
₹2.6K Cr
₹2.8K Cr

Net debt · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

₹-1.7K Cr
₹-1.8K Cr
₹-1.8K Cr
₹-997 Cr
₹-2.7K Cr
₹-2.3K Cr
₹-2.3K Cr
₹-894 Cr
₹-4.2K Cr
₹-3.0K Cr
₹-3.0K Cr
₹-112 Cr
₹-3.4K Cr
₹-2.6K Cr
₹-2.6K Cr
₹158 Cr
₹-2.6K Cr
₹-1.5K Cr
₹-1.5K Cr
₹-734 Cr

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

₹-2.3K Cr
₹-2.3K Cr
₹-2.3K Cr
₹-2.7K Cr
₹-3.9K Cr
₹-3.9K Cr
₹-3.8K Cr
₹-4.2K Cr
₹-4.4K Cr
₹-4.4K Cr
₹-3.3K Cr
₹-3.7K Cr
₹-3.5K Cr
₹-3.5K Cr
₹-3.6K Cr
₹-3.7K Cr
₹-3.1K Cr
₹-3.1K Cr
₹-3.4K Cr

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

₹-9.8K Cr
₹-9.8K Cr
₹-11.5K Cr
₹-11.5K Cr
₹-11.9K Cr
₹-11.9K Cr
₹-13.3K Cr
₹-13.3K Cr
₹-13.8K Cr
₹-13.8K Cr
₹-14.2K Cr
₹-14.2K Cr
₹-13.6K Cr
₹-13.6K Cr
₹-16.1K Cr
₹-16.1K Cr
₹-13.0K Cr
₹-13.0K Cr
₹-12.6K Cr

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd · SWANDEF

₹15.4K Cr
₹2.1K Cr
₹2.1K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
₹2.3K Cr
₹2.3K Cr
₹2.5K Cr
₹2.5K Cr
₹2.6K Cr
₹2.6K Cr
₹2.5K Cr
06 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 4 Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies compared here, at 43%. Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd is next at 36%. The same company also holds the highest ROCE change, at +9.7 percentage points. 4 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd leads ROCE at 43%, 7 percentage points above Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd. Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +9.7 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderGarden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · 43%
Gap19.4% versus #2 · Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage4/4 companies · 57 observations

Investor read: Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE43%
2Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK36%
3Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP16%
4Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF-7.6%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE+9.7 pp
2Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK−1.9 pp
3Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP−5.2 pp
4Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF−6.7 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
4/4 level · 4/4 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE27%+9.7 ppMar 2026
Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK20%−1.9 ppMar 2026
Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP10%−5.2 ppMar 2026
Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF-13%−6.7 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

17%
14%
13%
5.4%
7.2%
16%
15%
23%
16%
20%
16%
20%
14%
17%
10%

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

8.0%
7.7%
8.6%
7.4%
7.5%
26%
11%
30%
12%
30%
17%
38%
21%
42%
27%

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

4.9%
8.2%
10%
14%
13%
36%
20%
48%
27%
51%
22%
36%
17%
33%
20%

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd · SWANDEF

1.0%
-3.9%
-3.1%
-4.5%
-4.9%
-5.7%
-6.7%
-6.4%
-6.2%
-5.5%
-3.8%
-13%

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

−3.5 pp
−8.3 pp
−5.8 pp
+9.9 pp
+9.0 pp
+4.5 pp
+0.3 pp
−2.7 pp
−2.4 pp
−2.9 pp
−5.2 pp

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

+0.6 pp
−0.3 pp
−1.1 pp
+3.8 pp
+4.2 pp
+3.5 pp
+6.0 pp
+8.0 pp
+9.5 pp
+12.5 pp
+9.7 pp

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

+5.3 pp
+5.4 pp
+2.8 pp
+5.9 pp
+13.9 pp
+15.1 pp
+2.5 pp
−12.8 pp
−9.5 pp
−17.7 pp
−1.9 pp

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd · SWANDEF

−4.9 pp
−0.6 pp
−2.6 pp
−1.9 pp
−1.3 pp
+0.2 pp
+2.9 pp
−6.7 pp
07 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 4 Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies compared here, at 0.93×. Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd is next at 2.15×. Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd has the lowest P/E at 35.8×, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Guarded PEG series carries 15 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.93×, 56.7% below Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd. Only 3 of 4 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderGarden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · 0.93×
Gap56.7% versus #2 · Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/4 companies · 26 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE0.9
2Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK2.2
3Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP8.2
P/Elowest P/E
1Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK35.8
2Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE39.3
3Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP51.1
Valuation · company comparison
3/4 level · 3/4 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyGuarded PEGP/EReported
Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP8.245.5Mar 2026
Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK2.236.2Mar 2026
Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE0.934.4Mar 2026
Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF0.0Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Guarded PEG · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

1.5
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.9
8.2

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

0.3
0.3
0.8
1.4
2.8
1.4
1.7
1.0
1.4
1.2
2.5
1.3
1.6
1.4
0.9

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

0.2
0.2
0.9
0.8
2.2

P/E · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

8.8
8.1
7.7
7.7
7.2
10.0
12.5
11.5
28.3
44.7
45.9
43.9
74.4
52.9
46.7
46.4
65.0
58.6
57.2
45.5

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

14.2
11.2
12.8
12.7
13.5
18.2
25.4
23.7
28.9
37.8
36.2
29.1
67.3
52.9
50.5
48.9
65.9
53.4
46.4
34.4

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

8.2
8.0
8.6
7.0
8.0
13.6
19.7
14.1
22.5
36.6
34.6
23.5
44.6
36.5
36.4
38.8
53.0
52.6
43.9
36.2

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd · SWANDEF

0.0
08 · compare level, then change

Enterprise Value & Book Value

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 4 Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies compared here, at 21×. Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd is next at 23.6×. Cochin Shipyard Ltd has the lowest P/BV at 6.24×, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 4 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd leads ev/ebitda at 21×; Cochin Shipyard Ltd leads p/bv at 6.24×.

LeaderGarden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · 21×
Gap11% versus #2 · Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/4 companies · 52 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.

EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE21.0
2Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK23.6
3Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP26.8
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP6.2
2Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK9.5
3Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE11.2
4Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF183.9
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
3/4 level · 4/4 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyEV/EBITDAP/BVReported
Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP26.85.8Mar 2026
Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK23.69.8Mar 2026
Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE21.010.3Mar 2026
Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEF120.5Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

EV/EBITDA · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

3.6
3.5
3.1
2.7
2.8
3.8
5.2
4.2
10.4
18.9
23.9
24.4
45.9
32.9
29.2
28.4
39.8
35.9
34.9
26.8

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

2.7
2.7
1.2
0.9
5.6
8.0
11.5
14.3
13.8
10.1
37.5
28.9
28.2
27.2
41.1
32.3
28.6
21.0

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

3.7
1.5
9.2
19.6
18.7
11.5
29.1
23.3
23.8
25.4
35.6
33.7
28.8
23.6

P/BV · reported quarter history

Cochin Shipyard Ltd · COCHINSHIP

1.4
1.2
1.1
0.9
1.0
1.3
1.6
1.4
1.7
3.2
3.8
4.9
13.2
9.1
7.7
7.0
10.8
8.8
7.6
5.8

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd · GRSE

2.3
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.9
4.1
4.2
5.2
6.8
6.4
5.6
17.0
11.6
10.5
10.5
20.8
14.4
12.4
10.3

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd · MAZDOCK

1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
2.3
3.7
3.5
6.5
9.3
8.5
6.9
18.1
13.6
12.8
14.6
20.5
14.4
11.5
9.8

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd · SWANDEF

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.7
6.9
6.9
8.9
8.9
1.3
2.1
11.3
16.6
120.5
09 · let price answer last

Market action

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs at +626.2%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +55.5%. 1 of 4 covered companies is above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-17.

Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength

Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.

Before the conclusion · check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs comparison names 5 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 4 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 of the 8 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • Thin comparisons: Capital expenditure have fewer than three usable current readings.
10 · the complete set

Which companies are included?

All 4 companies in the canonical Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.

AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.

CompanyMarket valuePricePriced toLatest fundamentalsSource standing
Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd MAZDOCK₹92.5K Cr₹2,2942026-07-19Mar 2026Cross-checked
Cochin Shipyard Ltd COCHINSHIP₹36.6K Cr₹1,3922026-07-19Mar 2026Cross-checked
Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd GRSE₹29.4K Cr₹2,5662026-07-19Mar 2026Cross-checked
Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd SWANDEFAHEAD23/26 WEEKS₹12.8K Cr₹2,4282026-07-19Mar 2026Cross-checked
How each company's sources stand: Every company's second-feed figures reconcile against the primary source on overlapping reported periods, so nothing here is unverified or withheld.
Evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 4 Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Mar 2026 and market data through 2026-07-24. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Mar 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-24 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing4 cross-checked · 0 unverified · 0 withheld, of 4 graded companies.

A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from. Every company's standing is listed in the register above.

Questions investors ask · short, speakable answers

Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs company comparison FAQs

These 17 answers restate the Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 4 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Mar 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-24. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

What is the Nifty Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs index?

The Nifty Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs index tracks India's listed Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 4 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Mar 2026.

Which are the best Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs stocks in India?

Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd places first among 4 listed Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies, followed by Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Mar 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.

How many Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs stocks are listed in India?

This comparison covers 4 listed Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Mar 2026.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs company is the biggest?

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹13,006 crore, ahead of Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd at ₹7,002 crore. That covers 4 of 4 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs company is growing fastest?

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd has the fastest revenue growth at 100% year on year, across 4 of 4 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs company has the best profit margins?

Cochin Shipyard Ltd has the highest operating margin at 21%, from 4 of 4 comparable companies. Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +86 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs company makes the most profit?

Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd earns the most, at ₹2,755 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 4 of 4 comparable companies. Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 41.9%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs company earns the highest return on capital?

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 43%, across 4 of 4 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs stock is the cheapest?

On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd screens cheapest at 0.93×. Only 3 of 4 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs company has the strongest balance sheet?

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd carries the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹37 crore, from 4 of 4 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs stock has the strongest price momentum?

Swan Defence and Heavy Industries Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs company scores highest for research priority?

Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd scores 77.6 out of 100 with 97% evidence confidence, from 35 points on growth and earnings, 22 on capital efficiency, 12.4 on valuation and 8.2 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 4 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 10 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Mar 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs sector?

The 4 Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies on this page carry ₹1,71,340 crore of combined market value. Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd is the largest at ₹92,527 crore, about 54% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-29.

How is the Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs sector performing?

1 of the 4 covered Ship - Docks/Breaking/Repairs companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. A 52-week sector-versus-index comparison is not available from the current market series for this sector, so it is not quoted. Readings are as of 2026-07-29.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI