Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-29
20-quarter listed-company comparison

Bearings Stocks in India

Bearings: Schaeffler India Ltd owns the largest revenue base AND the fastest current growth.

Nifty Bearings Index — Constituents & Performance

The Bearings companies below are the listed Indian Bearings universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Bearings index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.

The sector itself · before any single company

How has Bearings moved against NIFTY 500?

The line below covers 5.1 years. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 25% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 2% on average over the last four reported quarters — close to flat. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 17 weeks running.

FADING · −1 in 4w~Price down, no fundamental support3 of 7 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months

RS ↑17w · 5/7 >200d (+0) · 3/7 lead (−1) · EPS 3/5↑

200500202620252024202320222021 423336 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100116Sep 22Mar 23Sep 23Mar 24Sep 24Mar 25Sep 25Mar 26Jun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 103, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 105, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 114, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 112, against 100 at the start · up 13.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 116, against 100 at the start · up 12.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 113, against 100 at the start · down 2.1% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 113, against 100 at the start · down 6.3% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 114, against 100 at the start · up 2.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 115, against 100 at the start · up 15.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 111, against 100 at the start · up 4.5% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 114, against 100 at the start · up 2.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 109, against 100 at the start · down 5.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 111, against 100 at the start · down 4.3% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 112, against 100 at the start · down 9.1% on a year ago · 6 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 105, against 100 at the start · up 25.1% on a year ago · 6 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two105 · Mar 26No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings doNO EARNINGS ON FILE
200500202620252024202320222021 423336 TRAILING 12-MONTH EPS · 100 AT THE START0100116Mar 23Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26Jun 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 100, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 3 reportingSep 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 103, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingDec 2022 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 105, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingMar 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 114, against 100 at the start · no comparable year yet · 4 reportingJun 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 112, against 100 at the start · up 13.7% on a year ago · 4 reportingSep 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 116, against 100 at the start · up 12.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2023 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 113, against 100 at the start · down 2.1% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 113, against 100 at the start · down 6.3% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 114, against 100 at the start · up 2.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 115, against 100 at the start · up 15.8% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2024 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 111, against 100 at the start · up 4.5% on a year ago · 5 reportingMar 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 114, against 100 at the start · up 2.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingJun 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 109, against 100 at the start · down 5.6% on a year ago · 5 reportingSep 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 111, against 100 at the start · down 4.3% on a year ago · 5 reportingDec 2025 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 112, against 100 at the start · down 9.1% on a year ago · 6 reportingMar 2026 · trailing 12-month earnings per share at 105, against 100 at the start · up 25.1% on a year ago · 6 reportingNot reported yet — earnings trail price by a quarter or two105No earnings on file this far back — the price series reaches further than the filings do
Bearings, equal-weighted, based at 200 NIFTY 500, same base, same start trailing 12-month earnings per share rising falling
Strength anatomy MixedHow much of the sector is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together3 of 7 stocks moving
Fresh0 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +5 vs the sector average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large 0/20
Mid 1/20
Small 2/3−1

Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 7 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

Sector relative strength · before individual stocks

Is Bearings outperforming NIFTY 500?

The 52-week comparison of Bearings against NIFTY 500 is not available from the current market series. 4 of 6 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. NRB Bearings Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +26.6%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.

—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
4/6Stocks leading NIFTY 500
2/6Stocks leading sector

Sector metric: 19.7 as of 2026-07-19 · CONSOLIDATION · falling.

The central tension: current leadership is concentrated, so durability matters more than rank.

Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.

Bottom line

The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 4 of 6 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500. Schaeffler India Ltd leads with revenue of ₹10,506 crore, based on 6 of 7 comparable companies through Jun 2026. Schaeffler India Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 19.7%, across 5 of 7 comparable companies.

Is the Bearings sector outperforming NIFTY 500?

The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 4 of 6 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500.

Which Bearings company is largest by revenue?

Schaeffler India Ltd leads with revenue of ₹10,506 crore, based on 6 of 7 comparable companies through Jun 2026.

Which Bearings company is growing fastest?

Schaeffler India Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 19.7%, across 5 of 7 comparable companies.

Which Bearings company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?

NRB Bearings Ltd ranks first at 63.2/100 with 87.8% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.

Which Bearings company reports the most CAPEX?

Harsha Engineers International Ltd reports the largest latest CAPEX at ₹9 crore, with 1 of 7 companies comparable.

Which Bearings company has the least gross debt?

Rolex Rings Ltd has the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹0 crore. Harsha Engineers International Ltd has the highest at ₹372 crore.

Which Bearings company has the lowest comparable PEG?

NRB Bearings Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.59, among 5 of 7 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.

How much history does this Bearings comparison include?

The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.

How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?

The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.

Companies
7
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹1.2 L Cr
Schaeffler India Ltd
Revenue growing
3/5
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
4/6
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit

4-Factor Sector Score

An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.

Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
NRB Bearings Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 87.8% evidence confidence.
Rolex Rings Ltd has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.

Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.

1. NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

63.2/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 88% evidence

Exact sum: 17.9 + 11.6 + 13.7 + 20 = 63.2

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

17.9/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 11.3% · PAT 74.7% · OPM change 0 pp

65% evidence

11.6/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 18.4% · debt/equity 0.16×

100% evidence

13.7/20Valuation

P/E 26.3× · PEG 0.59

100% evidence

20.0/20Relative strength

RS sector 26.6% · RS bench 34.9% · 1Y 34.4%

100% evidence

2. Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

62.3/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 100% evidence

Exact sum: 27.9 + 18.5 + 9.7 + 6.2 = 62.3

Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -4.3% and the one-year return is -1.3%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.

27.9/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 19.7% · PAT 23.8% · OPM change 0 pp

100% evidence

18.5/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 27.3% · debt/equity 0.01×

100% evidence

9.7/20Valuation

P/E 51.2× · PEG 2.13

100% evidence

6.2/20Relative strength

RS sector -4.3% · RS bench 2.6% · 1Y -1.3%

100% evidence

3. Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

59.1/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 88% evidence

Exact sum: 23.6 + 7.9 + 14.3 + 13.3 = 59.1

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

23.6/35Growth & earnings

Revenue 15.5% · PAT 72.2% · OPM change 6 pp

65% evidence

7.9/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 13% · debt/equity 0.27×

100% evidence

14.3/20Valuation

P/E 26.4× · PEG 1.72

100% evidence

13.3/20Relative strength

RS sector -0.9% · RS bench 6.2% · 1Y 2.4%

100% evidence

4. Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

50.8/100 · Mixed-positive evidence · 96% evidence

Exact sum: 10 + 19 + 7.1 + 14.7 = 50.8

Decision use: Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is 18.2%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.

10.0/35Growth & earnings

Revenue -1% · PAT -18.9% · OPM change 0 pp

88% evidence

19.0/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 21.2% · debt/equity 0×

100% evidence

7.1/20Valuation

P/E 21.2× · PEG 3.83

100% evidence

14.7/20Relative strength

RS sector 10.5% · RS bench 18.2% · 1Y 5.9%

100% evidence

5. SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

36.0/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 87% evidence

Exact sum: 11.7 + 15.9 + 5.4 + 3 = 36

Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.

11.7/35Growth & earnings

Revenue -23.5% · PAT -53.2% · OPM change -17 pp

83% evidence

15.9/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 24.2% · debt/equity 0×

95% evidence

5.4/20Valuation

P/E 25.2× · PEG 2.15

100% evidence

3.0/20Relative strength

RS sector -14.8% · RS bench -21.5% · 1Y -36.4%

70% evidence

6. SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

47.0/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 38% evidence

Exact sum: 12.4 + 15.1 + 9.5 + 10 = 47

Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

12.4/35Growth & earnings

Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -13 pp

32% evidence

15.1/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 29.9% · debt/equity 0×

95% evidence

9.5/20Valuation

P/E 36.4× · PEG —

15% evidence

10.0/20Relative strength

RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —

0% evidence

7. Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

43.8/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 49% evidence

Exact sum: 17.4 + 15.8 + 8.5 + 2.1 = 43.8

Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

17.4/35Growth & earnings

Revenue — · PAT — · OPM change -1 pp

17% evidence

15.8/25Capital efficiency

ROCE 19% · debt/equity 0.01×

80% evidence

8.5/20Valuation

P/E 56.7× · PEG —

15% evidence

2.1/20Relative strength

RS sector -9.9% · RS bench -3.4% · 1Y -8.8%

100% evidence

01 · compare level, then change

Revenue Scale & Growth Durability

Schaeffler India Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 7 Bearings companies compared here, at ₹10,506 crore. SKF India Ltd is next at ₹3,764 crore. The same company also holds the highest Revenue growth, at 19.7%. 6 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026. Its Revenue series carries 20 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.

What the numbers say: Schaeffler India Ltd is the scale leader at ₹10,506 crore, 179.1% ahead of SKF India Ltd. Schaeffler India Ltd's growth is 19.7% from a ₹10,506 crore base, with 20 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.

LeaderSchaeffler India Ltd · ₹10,506 crore
Gap179.1% versus #2 · SKF India Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/7 companies · 106 observations

Investor read: Schaeffler India Ltd is the scale benchmark; Schaeffler India Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.

This conclusion weakens if: Schaeffler India Ltd's growth falls below Schaeffler India Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.

Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER₹10.5K Cr
2SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA₹3.8K Cr
3SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS₹2.6K Cr
4Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA₹1.6K Cr
5NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING₹1.3K Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER20%
2Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA16%
3NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING11%
4Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS-1.0%
5SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA-24%
Revenue · company comparison
6/7 level · 5/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyRevenueRevenue growthReported
Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER₹2.8K Cr17%Jun 2026
Timken India Ltd TIMKEN₹1.1K Cr15%Mar 2026
SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS₹946 Cr31%Mar 2026
SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA₹595 Cr-51%Mar 2026
Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA₹474 Cr27%Mar 2026
NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING₹372 Cr13%Mar 2026
Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS₹306 Cr7.7%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Revenue · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

₹315 Cr
₹323 Cr
₹369 Cr
₹398 Cr
₹322 Cr
₹301 Cr
₹344 Cr
₹348 Cr
₹339 Cr
₹324 Cr
₹380 Cr
₹343 Cr
₹353 Cr
₹339 Cr
₹373 Cr
₹365 Cr
₹378 Cr
₹409 Cr
₹474 Cr
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

₹257 Cr
₹231 Cr
₹254 Cr
₹236 Cr
₹258 Cr
₹251 Cr
₹312 Cr
₹272 Cr
₹279 Cr
₹258 Cr
₹285 Cr
₹289 Cr
₹302 Cr
₹279 Cr
₹329 Cr
₹310 Cr
₹325 Cr
₹328 Cr
₹372 Cr
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

₹258 Cr
₹242 Cr
₹282 Cr
₹287 Cr
₹290 Cr
₹307 Cr
₹299 Cr
₹311 Cr
₹321 Cr
₹273 Cr
₹316 Cr
₹311 Cr
₹300 Cr
₹260 Cr
₹284 Cr
₹292 Cr
₹271 Cr
₹275 Cr
₹306 Cr
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

₹1.5K Cr
₹1.5K Cr
₹1.6K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.8K Cr
₹1.8K Cr
₹1.7K Cr
₹1.8K Cr
₹1.9K Cr
₹1.9K Cr
₹1.9K Cr
₹2.1K Cr
₹2.1K Cr
₹2.1K Cr
₹2.2K Cr
₹2.4K Cr
₹2.4K Cr
₹2.7K Cr
₹2.6K Cr
₹2.8K Cr

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹721 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹813 Cr
₹861 Cr
₹946 Cr
—

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

₹966 Cr
₹967 Cr
₹1.0K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.1K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹1.3K Cr
₹577 Cr
₹595 Cr
—

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹683 Cr
₹951 Cr
—
₹786 Cr
₹780 Cr
₹1.1K Cr
—

Revenue growth · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

—
—
—
26%
2.2%
-6.8%
-6.8%
-13%
5.3%
7.6%
10%
-1.4%
4.1%
4.6%
-1.8%
6.4%
7.1%
21%
27%
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

—
—
—
17%
0.4%
8.7%
23%
15%
8.1%
2.8%
-8.7%
6.3%
8.2%
8.1%
15%
7.3%
7.6%
18%
13%
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

—
—
—
26%
12%
27%
6.2%
8.5%
11%
-11%
5.6%
-0.2%
-6.4%
-4.9%
-10%
-6.2%
-9.6%
5.8%
7.7%
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

—
—
—
42%
18%
18%
8.0%
4.6%
5.6%
4.5%
11%
15%
14%
14%
16%
12%
15%
28%
19%
17%

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
31%
—

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

—
—
—
52%
12%
11%
5.4%
9.0%
4.4%
1.4%
9.9%
4.9%
11%
15%
0.8%
6.4%
5.2%
-54%
-51%
—

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
14%
15%
—
02 · compare level, then change

Operating Economics & Margin Trend

Timken India Ltd has the highest OPM among the 7 Bearings companies compared here, at 22%. Rolex Rings Ltd is next at 18.4%. Harsha Engineers International Ltd has the highest Margin change at +6 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 7 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Timken India Ltd leads opm at 22%; Harsha Engineers International Ltd leads margin change at +6 percentage points.

LeaderTimken India Ltd · 22%
Gap19.6% versus #2 · Rolex Rings Ltd
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/7 companies · 118 observations

Investor read: Timken India Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.

Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Timken India Ltd TIMKEN22%
2Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS18%
3NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING18%
4Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER18%
5Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA15%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA+6.0 pp
2Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS+0.0 pp
3NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING0.0 pp
4Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER0.0 pp
5Timken India Ltd TIMKEN−1.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
7/7 level · 7/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyOPMMargin changeReported
Timken India Ltd TIMKEN22%−1.0 ppMar 2026
Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS18%+0.0 ppMar 2026
Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER18%0.0 ppJun 2026
NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING18%0.0 ppMar 2026
Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA15%+6.0 ppMar 2026
SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS9.0%−13.0 ppMar 2026
SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA6.0%−17.0 ppMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

OPM · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

12%
13%
13%
12%
15%
14%
15%
12%
10%
12%
14%
16%
12%
13%
9.0%
15%
14%
14%
15%
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

18%
13%
17%
18%
12%
14%
21%
17%
16%
14%
17%
15%
17%
16%
18%
17%
16%
18%
18%
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

22%
22%
23%
22%
22%
22%
22%
22%
21%
19%
23%
23%
22%
20%
18%
21%
20%
21%
18%
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

18%
19%
20%
18%
18%
19%
19%
19%
18%
17%
18%
18%
17%
17%
18%
18%
19%
18%
18%
18%

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
22%
—
13%
12%
9.0%
—

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

17%
13%
15%
17%
20%
17%
15%
18%
11%
16%
18%
16%
10%
10%
23%
13%
13%
14%
6.0%
—

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

22%
22%
27%
25%
19%
17%
19%
19%
20%
17%
22%
18%
18%
16%
23%
—
18%
13%
22%
—

Margin change · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

—
—
—
+2.5 pp
+2.8 pp
+1.5 pp
+1.9 pp
−0.5 pp
−4.9 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+4.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
−5.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+6.0 pp
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

+3.1 pp
−4.9 pp
−1.7 pp
+4.9 pp
−6.6 pp
+1.3 pp
+4.5 pp
−1.2 pp
+4.2 pp
0.0 pp
−4.0 pp
−2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
0.0 pp
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

+4.1 pp
+1.4 pp
+2.1 pp
−1.2 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.5 pp
−1.4 pp
−0.0 pp
−1.1 pp
−2.7 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.4 pp
+1.0 pp
+0.5 pp
−4.3 pp
−1.8 pp
−1.8 pp
+1.2 pp
+0.0 pp
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

+0.9 pp
+0.9 pp
+3.5 pp
+1.6 pp
+0.4 pp
+0.2 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.6 pp
−0.2 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
−13.0 pp
—

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

+3.5 pp
−9.3 pp
−2.1 pp
+1.0 pp
+3.4 pp
+4.3 pp
−0.4 pp
+0.6 pp
−8.9 pp
−1.0 pp
+3.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−6.0 pp
+5.0 pp
−3.0 pp
+3.0 pp
+4.0 pp
−17.0 pp
—

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

+0.8 pp
+4.9 pp
+8.7 pp
+4.7 pp
−3.2 pp
−5.4 pp
−7.9 pp
−5.6 pp
+0.9 pp
−0.3 pp
+3.1 pp
−0.9 pp
−2.2 pp
−0.7 pp
+0.9 pp
—
+0.3 pp
−3.0 pp
−1.0 pp
—
03 · compare level, then change

Profit Scale & Acceleration

Schaeffler India Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 7 Bearings companies compared here, at ₹1,253 crore. SKF India Ltd is next at ₹265 crore. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at 23.8%. 6 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.

What the numbers say: Schaeffler India Ltd leads with ₹1,253 crore of TTM profit, 372.8% above SKF India Ltd. Schaeffler India Ltd shows 23.8% growth from a ₹1,253 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.

LeaderSchaeffler India Ltd · ₹1,253 crore
Gap372.8% versus #2 · SKF India Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/7 companies · 106 observations

Investor read: Schaeffler India Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.

Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER₹1.3K Cr
2SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA₹265 Cr
3Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA₹155 Cr
4NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING₹145 Cr
5SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS₹145 Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER24%
2Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS-19%
3SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA-53%
Net profit · company comparison
6/7 level · 3/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyNet profitProfit growthReported
Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER₹326 Cr14%Jun 2026
Timken India Ltd TIMKEN₹158 Cr-17%Mar 2026
SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS₹119 Cr-1.7%Mar 2026
Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA₹47 Cr26%Mar 2026
NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING₹42 Cr32%Mar 2026
Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS₹-0 Cr-100%Mar 2026
SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA₹-20 Cr-110%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Net profit · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

₹22 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹38 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹47 Cr
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

₹24 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹35 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹166 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹26 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹-1 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹41 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹42 Cr
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

₹33 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹49 Cr
₹53 Cr
₹46 Cr
₹48 Cr
₹47 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹49 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹49 Cr
₹44 Cr
₹48 Cr
₹-0 Cr
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

₹171 Cr
₹191 Cr
₹207 Cr
₹226 Cr
₹215 Cr
₹231 Cr
₹219 Cr
₹237 Cr
₹233 Cr
₹210 Cr
₹220 Cr
₹245 Cr
₹236 Cr
₹237 Cr
₹252 Cr
₹287 Cr
₹289 Cr
₹322 Cr
₹316 Cr
₹326 Cr

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹121 Cr
₹-1 Cr
₹77 Cr
₹-50 Cr
₹119 Cr
—

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

₹118 Cr
₹89 Cr
₹109 Cr
₹129 Cr
₹156 Cr
₹117 Cr
₹123 Cr
₹154 Cr
₹90 Cr
₹132 Cr
₹175 Cr
₹159 Cr
₹94 Cr
₹110 Cr
₹203 Cr
₹118 Cr
₹105 Cr
₹62 Cr
₹-20 Cr
—

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹78 Cr
₹190 Cr
—
₹94 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹158 Cr
—

Profit growth · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

—
—
—
41%
27%
78%
10%
-19%
-29%
-6.3%
12%
44%
45%
-10%
-105%
5.6%
24%
26%
—
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

—
—
—
50%
-46%
44%
106%
-21%
92%
622%
-8.6%
37%
44%
-87%
-103%
27%
14%
32%
—
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

—
—
—
67%
48%
77%
19%
-3.1%
-4.2%
-30%
-49%
3.0%
4.9%
-45%
131%
-1.5%
-10.0%
137%
-100%
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

—
—
—
77%
26%
21%
5.8%
4.9%
8.4%
-9.1%
0.5%
3.4%
1.3%
13%
15%
17%
22%
36%
25%
14%

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-1.7%
—

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

—
—
—
63%
32%
31%
13%
19%
-42%
13%
42%
3.3%
4.4%
-17%
16%
-26%
12%
-44%
-110%
—

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-29%
-17%
—
04 · compare level, then change

Capacity Spending & Returns On It

Harsha Engineers International Ltd has the highest CAPEX among the 7 Bearings companies compared here, at ₹9 crore. The same company also holds the highest CAPEX intensity, at 2.9%. 1 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Harsha Engineers International Ltd reports ₹9 crore of CAPEX; Harsha Engineers International Ltd has the highest covered intensity at 2.9%. Coverage is only 1 of 7 companies and 1 reported observations, so this is partial evidence—not a complete sector rank.

LeaderHarsha Engineers International Ltd · ₹9 crore
GapNot enough peers
Persistence1/1 recent comparable periods
Coverage1/7 companies · 1 observations

Investor read: Use the CAPEX rank as a diligence queue. Verify commissioning, utilization, cash conversion and post-investment ROCE before treating spend as value creation.

This conclusion weakens if: CAPEX rises without higher utilization, operating cash flow or incremental returns.

CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
CAPEXlargest spenders
1Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA₹9 Cr
CAPEX intensityhighest reinvestment intensity
1Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA2.9%
Capital expenditure · company comparison
1/7 level · 1/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

Withheld from this chart: Timken India Ltd (TIMKEN) — its two data sources disagree by up to 4.3% on reported income across 5 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyCAPEXCAPEX intensityReported
Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA₹9 Cr2.9%Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

CAPEX · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

₹9 Cr
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—

CAPEX intensity · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

2.9%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Annual capital allocation · 10-year view
7/7 capacity base · 7/7 OCF · 7/7 CAPEX · 7/7 FCF

Capacity base is net fixed assets plus capital work in progress, straight off the reported balance sheet. It is not cash spent, so it answers a narrower question than CAPEX — but it is reported for companies whose cash-flow CAPEX is not published, which is why it leads here. Missing years remain blank; annual values are never relabelled as quarters.

Full annual capacity base, operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow history

Capacity base · net fixed assets + CWIP · fiscal-year history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

₹0 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹337 Cr
₹345 Cr
₹358 Cr
₹399 Cr
₹433 Cr
₹575 Cr
₹679 Cr

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

₹256 Cr
₹275 Cr
₹337 Cr
₹380 Cr
₹369 Cr
₹369 Cr
₹379 Cr
₹380 Cr
₹417 Cr
₹464 Cr

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

₹346 Cr
₹376 Cr
₹383 Cr
₹374 Cr
₹373 Cr
₹426 Cr
₹437 Cr
₹470 Cr
₹478 Cr
₹486 Cr

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

—
—
—
—
—
—
₹1.4K Cr
₹1.9K Cr
₹2.4K Cr
₹2.5K Cr

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹191 Cr
₹345 Cr

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

—
—
—
—
₹410 Cr
₹454 Cr
₹487 Cr
₹561 Cr
₹607 Cr
₹468 Cr

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹1.4K Cr
₹1.5K Cr

Operating cash flow · fiscal-year history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

₹27 Cr
₹-107 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹113 Cr
₹121 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹137 Cr
₹136 Cr
₹206 Cr
₹68 Cr

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

₹85 Cr
₹133 Cr
₹71 Cr
₹102 Cr
₹158 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹61 Cr
₹115 Cr
₹84 Cr
₹241 Cr

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

₹156 Cr
₹136 Cr
₹194 Cr
₹184 Cr
₹59 Cr
₹59 Cr
₹213 Cr
₹221 Cr
₹227 Cr
₹190 Cr

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

—
—
—
—
—
₹465 Cr
₹751 Cr
₹884 Cr
₹840 Cr
₹1.3K Cr

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹-18 Cr
₹164 Cr

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

—
—
—
—
₹324 Cr
₹57 Cr
₹690 Cr
₹624 Cr
₹203 Cr
₹363 Cr

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹399 Cr
₹446 Cr

CAPEX · reported cash flow · fiscal-year history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

—
₹1 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹371 Cr
₹42 Cr
₹48 Cr
₹77 Cr
₹73 Cr
₹183 Cr
₹151 Cr

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

₹24 Cr
₹50 Cr
₹97 Cr
₹76 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹44 Cr
₹85 Cr
₹104 Cr

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

₹26 Cr
₹53 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹79 Cr
₹38 Cr
₹66 Cr
₹48 Cr
₹45 Cr

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹783 Cr
₹769 Cr
₹454 Cr

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹185 Cr

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

—
—
—
—
—
₹101 Cr
₹100 Cr
₹149 Cr
₹129 Cr
₹-61 Cr

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹251 Cr

Free cash flow · fiscal-year history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

—
₹-108 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹-258 Cr
₹79 Cr
₹-12 Cr
₹60 Cr
₹63 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹-83 Cr

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

₹61 Cr
₹83 Cr
₹-26 Cr
₹26 Cr
₹138 Cr
₹-21 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹71 Cr
₹-1 Cr
₹137 Cr

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

₹130 Cr
₹83 Cr
₹162 Cr
₹166 Cr
₹35 Cr
₹-20 Cr
₹175 Cr
₹155 Cr
₹179 Cr
₹145 Cr

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹101 Cr
₹71 Cr
₹836 Cr

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹-21 Cr

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

—
—
—
—
—
₹-44 Cr
₹590 Cr
₹475 Cr
₹74 Cr
₹424 Cr

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹195 Cr
05 · compare level, then change

Debt Load & Balance-Sheet Headroom

Rolex Rings Ltd has the lowest Gross debt among the 7 Bearings companies compared here, at ₹0 crore. SKF India Ltd is next at ₹3 crore. Schaeffler India Ltd has the lowest Net debt at ₹1,773 crore net cash, so level and change sit with different companies. 7 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: Schaeffler India Ltd has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with ₹1,773 crore net cash and gross debt of ₹48 crore. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.

LeaderRolex Rings Ltd · ₹0 crore
Gap100% versus #2 · SKF India Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/7 companies · 98 observations

Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.

This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.

Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS₹0 Cr
2SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA₹3 Cr
3SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS₹5 Cr
4Timken India Ltd TIMKEN₹15 Cr
5Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER₹48 Cr
Net debtlowest net debt
1Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER₹-1.8K Cr
2SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS₹-564 Cr
3Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS₹-403 Cr
4SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA₹-289 Cr
5Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA₹82 Cr
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
7/7 level · 6/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyGross debtNet debtReported
Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA₹372 Cr₹82 CrMar 2026
NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING₹154 Cr₹87 CrMar 2026
Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER₹48 Cr₹-1.8K CrJun 2026
Timken India Ltd TIMKEN₹15 Cr—Mar 2026
SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS₹5 Cr₹-564 CrMar 2026
SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA₹3 Cr₹-289 CrMar 2026
Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS₹0 Cr₹-403 CrMar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Gross debt · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

₹363 Cr
—
₹385 Cr
—
₹148 Cr
₹148 Cr
₹182 Cr
₹182 Cr
₹167 Cr
₹167 Cr
₹177 Cr
₹177 Cr
₹182 Cr
₹182 Cr
₹200 Cr
₹200 Cr
₹317 Cr
₹317 Cr
₹372 Cr
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

₹295 Cr
₹295 Cr
₹302 Cr
₹302 Cr
₹258 Cr
₹258 Cr
₹329 Cr
₹329 Cr
₹306 Cr
₹306 Cr
₹178 Cr
₹178 Cr
₹150 Cr
₹150 Cr
₹187 Cr
₹187 Cr
₹133 Cr
₹133 Cr
₹154 Cr
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

₹225 Cr
₹225 Cr
₹223 Cr
₹223 Cr
₹171 Cr
₹171 Cr
₹82 Cr
₹82 Cr
₹40 Cr
₹40 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
₹0 Cr
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

₹64 Cr
₹61 Cr
₹61 Cr
₹58 Cr
₹58 Cr
₹57 Cr
₹57 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹60 Cr
₹60 Cr
₹56 Cr
₹56 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹48 Cr

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹2 Cr
—
—
—
₹5 Cr
—

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

₹17 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹10 Cr
₹7 Cr
₹7 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹3 Cr
—

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹18 Cr
—
—
—
₹15 Cr
—

Net debt · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

₹334 Cr
—
₹350 Cr
—
₹-106 Cr
₹-106 Cr
₹-105 Cr
₹-113 Cr
₹-169 Cr
₹-169 Cr
₹-116 Cr
₹-141 Cr
₹-110 Cr
₹-110 Cr
₹-135 Cr
₹-118 Cr
₹40 Cr
₹40 Cr
₹82 Cr
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

₹193 Cr
₹193 Cr
₹224 Cr
₹220 Cr
₹187 Cr
₹187 Cr
₹248 Cr
₹231 Cr
₹194 Cr
₹194 Cr
₹99 Cr
₹57 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹99 Cr
₹97 Cr
₹61 Cr
₹61 Cr
₹87 Cr
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

₹206 Cr
₹206 Cr
₹203 Cr
₹203 Cr
₹167 Cr
₹167 Cr
₹48 Cr
₹48 Cr
₹-12 Cr
₹-12 Cr
₹-118 Cr
₹-118 Cr
₹-225 Cr
₹-225 Cr
₹-315 Cr
₹-315 Cr
₹-403 Cr
₹-403 Cr
—
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

₹-1.2K Cr
₹-1.3K Cr
₹-1.3K Cr
₹-1.3K Cr
₹-1.3K Cr
₹-1.5K Cr
₹-1.5K Cr
₹-1.3K Cr
₹-1.3K Cr
₹-1.5K Cr
₹-1.5K Cr
₹-1.1K Cr
₹-1.1K Cr
₹-1.3K Cr
₹-1.3K Cr
₹-1.3K Cr
₹-1.3K Cr
₹-1.8K Cr
₹-1.8K Cr
—

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹-564 Cr
—

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

₹-353 Cr
₹-353 Cr
₹-383 Cr
₹-383 Cr
₹-647 Cr
₹-647 Cr
₹-941 Cr
₹-941 Cr
₹-901 Cr
₹-901 Cr
₹-1.2K Cr
₹-1.2K Cr
₹-777 Cr
₹-777 Cr
₹-704 Cr
₹-704 Cr
₹-800 Cr
₹-800 Cr
₹-289 Cr
—
06 · compare level, then change

Return On Capital Employed

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 7 Bearings companies compared here, at 29.9%. Schaeffler India Ltd is next at 27.3%. SKF India Ltd has the highest ROCE change at +3.4 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 7 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: SKF India (Industrial) Ltd leads ROCE at 29.9%, 2.6 percentage points above Schaeffler India Ltd. SKF India Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +3.4 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.

LeaderSKF India (Industrial) Ltd · 29.9%
Gap9.5% versus #2 · Schaeffler India Ltd
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage7/7 companies · 77 observations

Investor read: SKF India (Industrial) Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.

ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS30%
2Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER27%
3SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA24%
4Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS21%
5Timken India Ltd TIMKEN19%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA+3.4 pp
2Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER+2.9 pp
3Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA+2.2 pp
4NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING+1.7 pp
5Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS−2.8 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
7/7 level · 6/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

Withheld from this chart: Timken India Ltd (TIMKEN) — its two data sources disagree by up to 4.3% on reported income across 5 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyROCEROCE changeReported
Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER29%+2.9 ppJun 2026
SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA29%+3.4 ppMar 2026
NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING18%+1.7 ppMar 2026
Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS15%−2.8 ppMar 2026
Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA12%+2.2 ppMar 2026
SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS11%—Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

ROCE · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

11%
—
20%
—
14%
—
14%
—
12%
14%
11%
16%
12%
16%
9.8%
11%
9.5%
12%
12%
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

20%
—
16%
—
16%
—
18%
—
20%
47%
15%
40%
14%
20%
16%
15%
16%
15%
18%
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

29%
—
31%
—
30%
—
29%
—
27%
29%
24%
24%
21%
20%
18%
20%
15%
21%
15%
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

—
21%
—
26%
—
25%
—
25%
30%
23%
27%
23%
27%
22%
26%
23%
28%
23%
29%
—

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
91%
—
—
11%
—

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

32%
—
27%
—
30%
—
31%
—
27%
30%
24%
29%
27%
30%
25%
26%
24%
26%
29%
—

ROCE change · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

—
—
—
—
+3.5 pp
—
−5.8 pp
—
−2.8 pp
—
−3.0 pp
—
+0.3 pp
+1.2 pp
−1.2 pp
−4.1 pp
−2.4 pp
−3.5 pp
+2.2 pp
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

—
—
—
—
−3.9 pp
—
+1.9 pp
—
+4.6 pp
—
−3.1 pp
—
−6.2 pp
−27.5 pp
+1.4 pp
−25.7 pp
+2.3 pp
−4.6 pp
+1.7 pp
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

—
—
—
—
+0.6 pp
—
−2.4 pp
—
−3.1 pp
—
−5.0 pp
—
−5.7 pp
−9.5 pp
−6.0 pp
−3.8 pp
−6.3 pp
+1.8 pp
−2.8 pp
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

—
—
—
—
—
+3.7 pp
—
−0.4 pp
—
−2.4 pp
—
−2.3 pp
−3.3 pp
−1.1 pp
−0.6 pp
−0.2 pp
+1.4 pp
+1.6 pp
+2.9 pp
—

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

—
—
—
—
−2.5 pp
—
+3.8 pp
—
−2.8 pp
—
−6.8 pp
—
+0.4 pp
+0.6 pp
+1.4 pp
−2.7 pp
−3.2 pp
−4.4 pp
+3.4 pp
—
07 · compare level, then change

Valuation Against Growth & Quality

NRB Bearings Ltd has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 7 Bearings companies compared here, at 0.59×. Harsha Engineers International Ltd is next at 1.72×. Rolex Rings Ltd has the lowest P/E at 21.2×, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: NRB Bearings Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.59×, 65.7% below Harsha Engineers International Ltd. Only 5 of 7 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.

LeaderNRB Bearings Ltd · 0.59×
Gap65.7% versus #2 · Harsha Engineers International Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/7 companies · 44 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.

PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING0.6
2Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA1.7
3Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER2.1
4SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA2.2
5Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS3.8
P/Elowest P/E
1Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS21.2
2SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA25.2
3NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING26.3
4Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA26.4
5SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS36.4
Valuation · company comparison
5/7 level · 7/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyGuarded PEGP/EReported
Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS3.815.9Mar 2026
SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA2.214.5Mar 2026
Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER2.153.5Jun 2026
Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA1.723.7Mar 2026
NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING0.614.8Mar 2026
Timken India Ltd TIMKEN—54.0Mar 2026
SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS—0.0Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

Guarded PEG · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

—
—
—
—
4.4
0.7
—
—
—
—
—
—
7.6
1.7
—
—
—
—
—
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

—
—
—
0.4
—
0.5
—
0.6
1.5
0.6
0.8
—
—
—
—
0.6
0.5
0.6
—
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

—
2.1
—
0.6
0.7
—
0.8
0.7
1.0
2.2
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.8
—
—
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

0.8
1.3
0.9
—
2.3
2.3
9.7
10.0
7.5
—
—
—
—
4.3
4.0
8.3
2.7
1.6
2.4
2.1

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

—
—
—
—
0.5
1.7
0.6
0.7
0.9
—
—
5.2
—
1.2
2.2
—
—
—
—
—

P/E · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

—
—
—
—
38.8
32.1
28.1
32.5
32.6
32.7
34.0
44.9
38.4
34.8
26.3
35.0
33.7
29.3
23.7
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

15.9
15.9
13.1
16.9
18.4
20.6
15.7
17.9
27.7
29.8
23.9
36.7
30.6
25.5
18.2
22.2
20.1
18.9
14.8
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

29.1
32.1
22.6
32.9
37.4
29.3
28.6
30.6
30.5
35.2
26.6
39.1
41.1
28.9
20.2
23.8
19.6
19.1
15.9
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

41.0
43.7
43.8
45.1
59.9
48.8
51.6
55.8
59.7
57.7
48.7
82.1
66.2
58.9
56.2
62.8
61.6
55.8
54.1
53.5

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.0
—

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

23.3
20.1
19.8
19.7
24.4
21.4
19.2
21.9
21.4
21.9
19.2
27.0
22.4
18.8
16.5
18.8
20.7
15.8
14.5
—

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
54.0
—
08 · compare level, then change

Enterprise Value & Book Value

SKF India Ltd has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 7 Bearings companies compared here, at 8.5×. NRB Bearings Ltd is next at 9×. Harsha Engineers International Ltd has the lowest P/BV at 2.64×, so level and change sit with different companies. 7 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.

What the numbers say: SKF India Ltd leads ev/ebitda at 8.5×; Harsha Engineers International Ltd leads p/bv at 2.64×.

LeaderSKF India Ltd · 8.5×
Gap5.6% versus #2 · NRB Bearings Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/7 companies · 95 observations

Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.

This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.

EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA8.5
2NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING9.0
3Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS10.7
4Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA13.4
5SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS24.5
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA2.6
2Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS3.1
3NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING4.0
4SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA5.5
5Timken India Ltd TIMKEN8.1
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
7/7 level · 7/7 change

Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.

All-company data · latest reported quarter

Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.

CompanyEV/EBITDAP/BVReported
Timken India Ltd TIMKEN37.18.6Mar 2026
Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER31.510.7Jun 2026
SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUS24.5-16,024.6Mar 2026
Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHA13.42.2Mar 2026
Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS10.72.7Mar 2026
NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARING9.02.3Mar 2026
SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA8.52.7Mar 2026
Full 20-quarter history · every available company

EV/EBITDA · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

—
—
—
—
22.0
18.1
18.2
20.7
18.5
18.0
18.7
25.1
21.9
20.3
15.2
17.9
17.6
16.4
13.4
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

9.2
9.7
8.2
9.1
10.1
10.6
8.6
10.3
14.8
16.1
13.3
18.7
15.6
13.8
9.8
13.0
12.0
11.3
9.0
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

27.7
30.0
15.6
19.5
23.0
19.2
19.7
22.4
21.5
24.2
17.9
24.7
25.6
17.9
12.2
16.3
13.2
12.6
10.7
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

24.8
26.8
27.1
29.0
39.4
32.4
31.6
34.2
36.7
35.4
29.3
49.7
39.9
34.9
32.8
36.6
35.9
32.5
31.9
31.5

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
106.4
24.5
—

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

14.2
13.1
12.7
12.4
15.4
13.5
12.1
13.8
13.0
12.9
11.6
17.2
13.7
11.8
10.1
11.2
12.8
9.5
8.5
—

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
37.1
—

P/BV · reported quarter history

Harsha Engineers International Ltd · HARSHA

—
—
—
—
4.2
3.5
2.9
3.9
3.6
3.2
3.3
4.7
4.0
3.7
2.8
3.2
2.9
2.6
2.2
—

NRB Bearings Ltd · NRBBEARING

2.6
2.8
2.0
2.5
2.5
2.4
2.2
3.0
4.1
4.9
3.9
5.1
3.4
2.9
2.1
3.3
3.0
2.8
2.3
—

Rolex Rings Ltd · ROLEXRINGS

6.1
6.7
6.7
8.2
8.8
7.6
10.0
11.1
8.1
8.2
5.7
9.2
8.0
5.1
3.5
4.9
3.4
2.9
2.7
—

Schaeffler India Ltd · SCHAEFFLER

7.2
7.5
8.4
9.3
13.1
10.0
10.5
11.3
12.1
11.7
9.1
15.4
12.4
11.1
11.0
11.4
11.5
10.9
11.7
10.7

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd · SKFINDUS

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-16,024.6
—

SKF India Ltd · SKFINDIA

4.4
5.1
4.6
5.0
5.2
4.9
5.2
6.1
5.0
4.4
4.0
6.4
4.7
4.6
3.9
4.0
4.2
3.2
2.7
—

Timken India Ltd · TIMKEN

—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
8.6
—
09 · let price answer last

Market action

NRB Bearings Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Bearings at +34.4%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +34.9%. 4 of 6 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-17.

Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength

Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.

Before the conclusion · check the blind spots

What can make this comparison misleading?

This Bearings comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 7 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 has second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree. 1 of the 8 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings.

Keep these limits visible

  • A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
  • A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
  • The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
  • An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
  • 1 company is missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
  • Thin comparisons: Capital expenditure have fewer than three usable current readings.
10 · the complete set

Which companies are included?

All 7 companies in the canonical Bearings membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.

AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.

CompanyMarket valuePricePriced toLatest fundamentalsSource standing
Schaeffler India Ltd SCHAEFFLER₹64.2K Cr₹4,1082026-07-19Jun 2026Cross-checked
Timken India Ltd TIMKEN19/26 WEEKS₹23.5K Cr₹3,1272026-07-19Mar 2026Second feed withheld
SKF India (Industrial) Ltd SKFINDUSAHEAD₹13.5K Cr₹2,7312026-07-19Mar 2026Cross-checked
SKF India Ltd SKFINDIA₹7.3K Cr₹1,4852026-07-19Mar 2026Cross-checked
NRB Bearings Ltd NRBBEARINGAHEAD18/26 WEEKS₹3.9K Cr₹3982026-07-19Mar 2026Cross-checked
Rolex Rings Ltd ROLEXRINGS22/26 WEEKS₹3.8K Cr₹1402026-07-19Mar 2026Cross-checked
Harsha Engineers International Ltd HARSHAAHEAD20/26 WEEKS₹3.7K Cr₹4062026-07-19Mar 2026Cross-checked
How each company's sources stand: 1 of 7 companies has a second data feed that is known to disagree with the primary source, so nothing from it is drawn: Timken India Ltd (TIMKEN) — its two data sources disagree by up to 4.3% on reported income across 5 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld.
Evidence and freshness

How was this comparison built?

This comparison is built from the reported filings of 7 Bearings companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-24. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.

FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-24 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing6 cross-checked · 0 unverified · 1 withheld, of 7 graded companies.

A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from. Every company's standing is listed in the register above.

Questions investors ask · short, speakable answers

Bearings company comparison FAQs

These 18 answers restate the Bearings comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 7 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-24. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.

What is the Nifty Bearings index?

The Nifty Bearings index tracks India's listed Bearings companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 7 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Bearings sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.

Which are the best Bearings stocks in India?

Ranked by this page's four-factor score, NRB Bearings Ltd places first among 7 listed Bearings companies, followed by Schaeffler India Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.

How many Bearings stocks are listed in India?

This comparison covers 7 listed Bearings companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.

Which Bearings company is the biggest?

Schaeffler India Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹10,506 crore, ahead of SKF India Ltd at ₹3,764 crore. That covers 6 of 7 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.

Which Bearings company is growing fastest?

Schaeffler India Ltd has the fastest revenue growth at 19.7% year on year, across 5 of 7 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.

Which Bearings company has the best profit margins?

Timken India Ltd has the highest operating margin at 22%, from 7 of 7 comparable companies. Harsha Engineers International Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +6 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.

Which Bearings company makes the most profit?

Schaeffler India Ltd earns the most, at ₹1,253 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 6 of 7 comparable companies. Schaeffler India Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 23.8%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.

Which Bearings company earns the highest return on capital?

SKF India (Industrial) Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 29.9%, across 7 of 7 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.

Which Bearings stock is the cheapest?

On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — NRB Bearings Ltd screens cheapest at 0.59×. Only 5 of 7 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.

Which Bearings company has the strongest balance sheet?

Rolex Rings Ltd carries the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹0 crore, from 7 of 7 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.

Which Bearings stock has the strongest price momentum?

NRB Bearings Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.

Which Bearings company scores highest for research priority?

NRB Bearings Ltd scores 63.2 out of 100 with 87.8% evidence confidence, from 17.9 points on growth and earnings, 11.6 on capital efficiency, 13.7 on valuation and 20 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.

How many Bearings companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?

It compares 7 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 10 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.

What is the total market cap of the Bearings sector?

The 7 Bearings companies on this page carry ₹1,19,919 crore of combined market value. Schaeffler India Ltd is the largest at ₹64,205 crore, about 54% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-29.

What is the Bearings sector's P/E ratio?

The median price-to-earnings ratio across the 7 Bearings companies on this page is 26.4×, measured on the 7 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-29.

How is the Bearings sector performing?

4 of the 6 covered Bearings companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. A 52-week sector-versus-index comparison is not available from the current market series for this sector, so it is not quoted. Readings are as of 2026-07-29.

Why are some values on this page blank?

A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.

Is this investment advice?

No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI