UP Fintech Holding Limited

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

UP Fintech Holding Limited trades at $4.8, between stages. That is −35.8% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 5% of a 52-week range of $4 to $13. On relative strength it is currently behind the S&P 500 on a trailing-13-week view (29 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is between stages. At $4.8 it trades −35.8% versus its 200-day average and sits at 5% of its 52-week range ($4–$13).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 1.0 years the stock moved −52% while the S&P 500 moved +19% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (29 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-01-09) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/BV sits at the 18th percentile of its own range.

Valuation For a bank we price the book, not the earnings: P/BV is what the market pays for each $1 of the bank's net worth. A bank below 1× book is priced below the value of what it owns, net of what it owes.

UP Fintech Holding Limited trades at 1.0× P/BV, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 18% of the time. Its long-run median P/BV is 1.9×, measured across 1.0 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/BV of 1.0× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 18% of the time, against a long-run median of 1.9× measured over 1.0 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

One caveat before moving on: the net margin is the best this company has ever printed — cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. If profitability mean-reverts, today's multiple is higher than it looks.

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year book value grew while the price moved −54.6% — price and book moved together, holding the multiple in its range.

Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the book-value line underneath it, not the multiple.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

UP Fintech Holding Limited reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — growth is normalizing off a hyper-growth base: revenue growth has eased from +79.2% at its peak to +50.0% but is still expanding, ROE slipping at 13.1%. The read is built from 12 quarters across 4 curves, on full evidence.

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

No sector-relative score — UP Fintech Holding Limited is not among the largest members shown in this industry comparison for Capital Markets.

The score is a rank WITHIN a peer set: every metric is scored by percentile against the other members. Without the peer set there is no score to state, so none is invented here.

Revenue For a bank, revenue is everything the franchise earns — interest on the loan book plus fees from its businesses.

UP Fintech Holding Limited reported $0.1 B of income in the Mar 26 quarter, +27.3% year on year. That is the 8th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 21.2% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.5 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.6 B.

UP Fintech Holding Limited reported $0.1 B of income in the Mar 26 quarter, +27.3% year on year. That is the 8th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 4 years it has compounded at 21.2% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at $0.5 B. The last four reported quarters add to $0.6 B.

FY25 revenue came in at $0.5 B (+63.6% on the year), capping 4 years at 21.2% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed $0.1 B, +27.3% year on year — the 8th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +52.7% growth against the decade's 21.2% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +50.0% over the last 4 quarters against +57.4%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over; TTM profit +37.5% vs +91.5%/yr — rolling over.

→ Revenue grew — did the net margin hold as it scaled? Next: −21.4% this quarter (−48.7 pp YoY).

Net margin Net margin — what the bank keeps of every $100 of revenue after every cost, provision and tax. With big fee businesses in the mix, it is the cleanest margin we can read for this bank.

UP Fintech Holding Limited's net margin is −21.4% in the Mar 26 quarter, −48.7 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 5 fiscal years the net margin has ranged 0.0% to 31.5%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.

UP Fintech Holding Limited's net margin is −21.4% in the Mar 26 quarter, −48.7 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 5 fiscal years the net margin has ranged 0.0% to 31.5%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's net margin is −21.4%, −48.7 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the net margin has ranged 0.0%–31.5%, and FY25's 31.5% is the top of that band — a record year.

Why: the numbers show the net margin move clearly, but the cost lines behind it sit below what we hold — so we state the move without inventing its driver.

Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.

→ The net margin slipped — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit −200.0% in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

UP Fintech Holding Limited posted a net loss of $0.03 B in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.2 B. The 4-year compound rate is 103.1%. That loss is 21.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

UP Fintech Holding Limited posted a net loss of $0.03 B in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $0.2 B. The 4-year compound rate is 103.1%. That loss is 21.4% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $0.0 B. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Mar 26 profit was $−0.0 B, −200.0% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed $0.2 B (+183.3%), and the 4-year compound rate is 103.1%.

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed +27.3% and the margin −48.7 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit +5.6% vs revenue +52.7%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

→ Profit is up — how clean is the loan book behind it? Next: we hold no quarterly loan-book numbers — the section says so plainly.

Asset quality — the ladder Gross NPA is the slice of the loan book where repayments have stopped. Net NPA is what remains after the money already set aside against those loans. Falling is healing; rising is damage arriving.

Loan-book quality history is not available for UP Fintech Holding Limited, so this section names the gap rather than estimating a ratio. No gross or net non-performing-asset series is filed in a form this page can read, and none is inferred from the profit line. The income, margin and return sections above carry the evidence this business does report.

We do not hold quarterly loan-book quality numbers for this bank, so this section states that plainly rather than working around it.

Why: loan-book quality is the engine room of a bank, and its drivers — slippages, recoveries, provisioning — sit below what we hold for this name; the sections around it carry the reads we can stand behind.

→ Behind the profits — is the book itself still growing? Next: revenue grew +63.6% in FY25.

The loan book We read the loan book through revenue — when the book and the businesses grow, revenue grows with them. It is a rough proxy, and we say so: rate moves and fee swings can shift it a few points in any one year.

UP Fintech Holding Limited's revenue grew +63.6% in FY25 to $0.5 B, so the book is growing. The latest quarter ran +27.3% year on year. The net margin on that income is −21.4%, −48.7 percentage points against a year ago. Interest income is a proxy for the book; rate moves can shift it a few points in any one year.

FY25 revenue was $0.5 B, +63.6% on the year, and the latest quarter ran +27.3% year on year. The net margin on that revenue is −21.4% this quarter (−48.7 pp YoY) — growth with a narrowing margin on it.

The synthesis: a lender compounds when the book grows while the margin holds and the loan book stays clean — with quarterly loan-quality numbers missing here, revenue growth and margin are the two we watch.

→ Does all of this actually earn its keep on equity? Next: ROE is 15%.

Returns on equity and assets Two numbers rate a bank: ROE — what it earns on shareholder money — and ROA — what it earns on everything it deploys. ROE above ~13–15% earns its keep; below that, growth builds book slowly.

UP Fintech Holding Limited earns a return on equity of 20% in FY25. Its trough over the ladder below was 0% in FY22. On the asset side every $100 of the balance sheet earned about $1.41, which is the return before leverage is applied.

FY25 ROE came in at 20%, recovered from a FY22 trough of 0%. On assets, the latest reading is about 1.41% — every $100 the bank deploys earns roughly $1.41 a year. That clears the bar a bank must beat for its book value to compound.

Why ROE moved: profit compounded 103.1% a year over 4 years while the equity base grew more slowly — earnings recovering faster than book value builds is what lifts ROE off a trough.

→ Who owns this bank, and are they adding or leaving? Next: the register.

Dividend

UP Fintech Holding Limited pays no dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters it has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, which makes the cash-flow and reinvestment sections the place that cash shows up.

UP Fintech Holding Limited does not currently pay a dividend. Across the last 12 reported quarters the company has declared no dividend per share, so there is no payout history to chart and no yield to quote. Companies at this stage typically reinvest earnings instead of distributing them.

→ No payout to follow. The cash question becomes what the business does with what it earns instead.

Debt

For a bank, borrowings are raw material, not a warning sign — solvency is read through the returns and the loan book. A manufacturer’s debt is a claim against its profits, so the debt-to-equity lens that works everywhere else misleads on a lender and is not applied here.

A manufacturer’s debt is a claim against its profits; a bank’s borrowings are its inventory — money taken in to be lent out. The debt lens that works everywhere else misleads here, so this page does not apply it. The solvency questions for a bank — is the loan book sound, is the equity earning — are read through the loan-book and returns sections above.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: the register.

Ownership There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read here, so we read the crowd through short interest — the slice of tradable shares currently sold short, positioned for a fall.

No ownership or positioning reading is held for UP Fintech Holding Limited, so this section names the gap rather than filling it. At typical trading volumes those positions would take about 4.3 days to buy back. There is no quarter-by-quarter holder register to read for this filer, so the crowd is read through short interest instead.

We hold no ownership or positioning reading for this stock, so this section says that plainly.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

UP Fintech Holding Limited: the Z-score is omitted — it was built for manufacturers, not banks, and applying it here would be theatre. The Z-score was built for manufacturers and is not applied to banks and lenders, so solvency here is read from the capital and asset-quality lines instead.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is omitted — it was built for manufacturers, not banks, and applying it here would be theatre.

Frequently asked questions