Capital Markets: Morgan Stanley owns the largest revenue base; Hut 8 Corp. has the fastest current growth.
The industry itself · before any single company
How has Capital Markets moved against S&P 500?
The line below covers 5.2 years. Over the most recent two of them this industry is 39% ahead of S&P 500. Earnings across its companies grew 28% on average over the last four reported quarters.
BASING · +-5 joined✓Price and the fundamentals both up15 of 51 companies ahead of S&P 500 by 5% or more over three months7 are 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more
Capital Markets, equal-weighted, based at 200S&P 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Strength anatomyNarrowHow much of the industry is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together15 of 51 stocks moving
Fresh4 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +6 vs the industry average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large6/11+3
Mid6/18−3
Small3/22−5
Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the industry line is an equal-weighted index of its 51 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the industry taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is Capital Markets outperforming S&P 500?
Capital Markets has outperformed S&P 500 by 14.8% over the last 52 weeks. Over 13 weeks the gap is a lead of 0.6%. 12 of 25 covered companies currently beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Hut 8 Corp. is the strongest against the sector itself at +52.2%.
+0.6%Sector vs S&P 500 · 13 weeks
+14.8%Sector vs S&P 500 · 52 weeks
12/25Stocks leading S&P 500
10/25Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
Capital Markets has outperformed S&P 500 by 14.8% over 52 weeks and 0.6% over 13 weeks. 12 of 25 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 10 of 25 beat the sector itself. Morgan Stanley leads with income of $78,042 million, based on 23 of 27 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Is the Capital Markets sector outperforming S&P 500?
Capital Markets has outperformed S&P 500 by 14.8% over 52 weeks and 0.6% over 13 weeks. 12 of 25 covered companies beat the S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength, while 10 of 25 beat the sector itself.
Which Capital Markets company is largest by income?
Morgan Stanley leads with income of $78,042 million, based on 23 of 27 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which Capital Markets company is growing fastest?
Hut 8 Corp. has the fastest current income growth at 100%, across 22 of 27 comparable companies.
Which Capital Markets company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Virtu Financial, Inc. ranks first at 76.5/100 with 60.2% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Capital Markets company has the lowest comparable P/BV-to-ROE?
Virtu Financial, Inc. has the lowest comparable P/BV ÷ ROE at 0.06, among 21 of 27 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this Capital Markets comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
27
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
$1.2T
Morgan Stanley
Revenue growing
22/22
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating S&P 500
12/25
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Virtu Financial, Inc. has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 60.2% evidence confidence.
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. has stronger price confirmation than earnings confirmation; that is a research prompt, not permission to chase.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. Financial companies use P/BV÷ROE and asset quality; PEG, industrial OPM and ROCE are excluded.
Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -14.5% and the one-year return is -0.6%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
19.0/35Growth & earnings
Income — · PAT —
26% evidence
5.3/25Capital efficiency
ROA -1.5% · ROE -144.7% · GNPA —
68% evidence
9.8/20Valuation
P/BV 0.95× · P/BV÷ROE —
10% evidence
3.0/20Relative strength
RS sector -48.2% · RS bench -46.6% · 1Y -44.5%
70% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Income Scale & Growth Durability
Morgan Stanley has the highest Income among the 27 Capital Markets companies compared here, at $78,042 million. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is next at $66,203 million. Hut 8 Corp. has the highest Income growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: Morgan Stanley is the scale leader at $78,042 million, 17.9% ahead of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. Hut 8 Corp.'s growth is stored at the ≥100% scoring cap; the uncapped TTM change is 219.3% from a $380 million base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderMorgan Stanley · $78,042 million
Gap17.9% versus #2 · The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage23/27 companies · 469 observations
Investor read: Morgan Stanley is the scale benchmark; Hut 8 Corp. is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Morgan Stanley's growth falls below Hut 8 Corp.'s for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
For lenders, reported income is used instead of industrial-company sales. Growth is compared year-on-year.
Incomelargest
1Morgan Stanley MS$78.0B
2The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GS$66.2B
3Galaxy Digital Inc. GLXY$58.7B
4The Charles Schwab Corporation SCHW$26.0B
5LPL Financial Holdings Inc. LPLA$18.3B
Income growthfastest growers
1Hut 8 Corp. HUT100%
2IREN Limited IREN100%
3Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. FIGR68%
4Circle Internet Group, Inc. CRCL51%
5Evercore Inc. EVR47%
Income · company comparison
23/27 level · 22/27 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. has the highest Net profit among the 27 Capital Markets companies compared here, at $20,973 million. Morgan Stanley is next at $20,370 million. Piper Sandler Companies has the highest Profit growth at the 100% top of the scoring scale, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. leads with $20,973 million of TTM profit, 3% above Morgan Stanley. Piper Sandler Companies shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (124.1% uncapped) growth from a $325 million profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. · $20,973 million
Gap3% versus #2 · Morgan Stanley
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage23/27 companies · 484 observations
Investor read: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is ranked only where the comparison base is economically meaningful. Loss-to-profit flips are shown but do not win the growth table.
Net profitlargest
1The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GS$21.0B
2Morgan Stanley MS$20.4B
3The Charles Schwab Corporation SCHW$10.1B
4Robinhood Markets, Inc. HOOD$1.9B
5Tradeweb Markets Inc. TW$987M
Profit growthfastest growers
1Piper Sandler Companies PIPR100%
2Evercore Inc. EVR69%
3Tradeweb Markets Inc. TW66%
4StoneX Group Inc. SNEX56%
5Marex Group Limited MRX41%
Net profit · company comparison
23/27 level · 16/27 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 25 companies with a series here. The remaining 13 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
No company in this Capital Markets comparison has a funding base figure that passes this section's guard, so the Deposits rank is empty. On Borrowings, Morgan Stanley is highest at $942,036 million, across 27 of 27 companies with a usable reading.
What the numbers say: There is not enough comparable evidence to name a reliable deposits leader.
LeaderNo comparable leader
GapNot enough peers
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage0/27 companies · 0 observations
Investor read: The current leader sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current borrowings signal.
For banks, debt is operating funding rather than industrial leverage. Deposits and borrowings are therefore shown as funding-base levels; asset quality, funding cost and liquidity determine whether that funding is attractive.
Depositslargest deposit bases
—Not enough comparable data—
Borrowingslargest borrowings
1Morgan Stanley MS$942.0B
2The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. GS$796.0B
3Jefferies Financial Group Inc. JEF$33.8B
4Stifel Financial Corp. SF$33.1B
5The Charles Schwab Corporation SCHW$33.0B
Funding base · company comparison
0/27 level · 27/27 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
No consistent historical series is available for deposits.
Borrowings · reported quarter history
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Miami International Holdings, Inc. has the highest ROA among the 27 Capital Markets companies compared here, at 10.8%. Evercore Inc. is next at 8.7%. Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. has the highest ROA change at +31.3 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. 25 of 27 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Miami International Holdings, Inc. leads roa at 10.8%; Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. leads roa change at +31.3 percentage points.
LeaderMiami International Holdings, Inc. · 10.8%
Gap24.1% versus #2 · Evercore Inc.
Persistence3/4 recent comparable periods
Coverage25/27 companies · 449 observations
Investor read: Miami International Holdings, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roa change signal.
ROA is the cleanest first comparison for lenders because the balance sheet is the operating asset.
ROAhighest
1Miami International Holdings, Inc. MIAX11%
2Evercore Inc. EVR8.7%
3PJT Partners Inc. PJT6.0%
4Piper Sandler Companies PIPR3.5%
5Virtu Financial, Inc. VIRT3.3%
ROA changefastest improvers
1Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. BMNR+31.3 pp
2Galaxy Digital Inc. GLXY+6.1 pp
3TeraWulf Inc. WULF+5.5 pp
4Evercore Inc. EVR+3.7 pp
5Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. FIGR+3.6 pp
Return on assets · company comparison
25/27 level · 25/27 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 25 companies with a series here. The remaining 13 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 25 companies with a series here. The remaining 13 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Virtu Financial, Inc. has the highest ROE among the 27 Capital Markets companies compared here, at 34.9%. Miami International Holdings, Inc. is next at 32%. The same company also holds the highest ROE change, at +15.8 percentage points. 27 of 27 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Virtu Financial, Inc. leads both roe at 34.9% and roe change at +15.8 percentage points.
LeaderVirtu Financial, Inc. · 34.9%
Gap9.1% versus #2 · Miami International Holdings, Inc.
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage27/27 companies · 487 observations
Investor read: Virtu Financial, Inc. sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roe change signal.
ROE shows the return to shareholders, but should be read with asset quality and leverage.
ROEhighest
1Virtu Financial, Inc. VIRT35%
2Miami International Holdings, Inc. MIAX32%
3Evercore Inc. EVR17%
4The Charles Schwab Corporation SCHW11%
5Morgan Stanley MS10%
ROE changefastest improvers
1Virtu Financial, Inc. VIRT+15.8 pp
2Galaxy Digital Inc. GLXY+10.1 pp
3Evercore Inc. EVR+7.8 pp
4Morgan Stanley MS+6.9 pp
5The Charles Schwab Corporation SCHW+6.7 pp
Return on equity · company comparison
27/27 level · 27/27 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 27 companies with a series here. The remaining 15 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
No company in this Capital Markets comparison reports gross NPA on a comparable basis, so there is nothing to rank here — 0 of 27 companies have a usable current reading. The section is shown rather than removed so an unavailable metric is not mistaken for one that was quietly left out. Filings were read through Jun 2026.
Lower gross NPA is better. Improvement means the ratio is falling, so ranks are intentionally inverted.
07 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
Virtu Financial, Inc. has the lowest P/BV ÷ ROE among the 27 Capital Markets companies compared here, at 0.06×. Miami International Holdings, Inc. is next at 0.11×. TeraWulf Inc. has the lowest P/BV at -77.9×, so level and change sit with different companies. 21 of 27 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Jun 2026.
What the numbers say: Virtu Financial, Inc. has the lowest comparable P/BV ÷ ROE at 0.06×, 45.5% below Miami International Holdings, Inc.. Only 21 of 27 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderVirtu Financial, Inc. · 0.06×
Gap45.5% versus #2 · Miami International Holdings, Inc.
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage21/27 companies · 335 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
Banks are compared on P/BV and P/BV÷ROE, not PEG. Lower is better only if asset quality and return durability hold; cheap book value with weakening NPAs is not automatically attractive.
P/BV ÷ ROElowest return-adjusted price
1Virtu Financial, Inc. VIRT0.1
2Miami International Holdings, Inc. MIAX0.1
3Morgan Stanley MS0.2
4Stifel Financial Corp. SF0.2
5Marex Group Limited MRX0.3
P/BVlowest P/BV
1TeraWulf Inc. WULF-77.9
2Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc. BMNR1.0
3Jefferies Financial Group Inc. JEF1.0
4Stifel Financial Corp. SF1.9
5Riot Platforms, Inc. RIOT2.0
Valuation · company comparison
21/27 level · 26/27 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Showing the 12 largest of 25 companies with a series here. The remaining 13 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Showing the 12 largest of 26 companies with a series here. The remaining 14 are complete in the plain-text rendition and the trace payload — nothing is dropped from the data, only from this grid.
Hut 8 Corp. has the strongest one-year price move in Capital Markets at +411.3%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against the S&P 500 at +54.7%. 12 of 25 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 314 weekly closes through 2026-07-28.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Capital Markets comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 27 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 2 of the 7 ranked sections have fewer than three usable current readings. A high growth rate can still be a low-base artefact.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROE can be manufactured with leverage. Read it beside ROA and asset quality.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
Banks and lenders are not forced through operating-margin or ROCE comparisons; missing lender-specific fields remain visibly missing.
Thin comparisons: Funding base, Asset quality have fewer than three usable current readings.
09 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 27 companies in the canonical Capital Markets membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 27 Capital Markets companies, normalized to a common $ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-28. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-28 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
These 15 answers restate the Capital Markets comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 27 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-28. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
Which Capital Markets company is the biggest?
Morgan Stanley is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month income of $78,042 million, ahead of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. at $66,203 million. That covers 23 of 27 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which Capital Markets company is growing fastest?
Hut 8 Corp. has the fastest income growth at 100% year on year, across 22 of 27 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which Capital Markets company makes the most profit?
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. earns the most, at $20,973 million of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 23 of 27 comparable companies. Piper Sandler Companies has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Capital Markets company earns the highest return on capital?
Miami International Holdings, Inc. leads on return on assets at 10.8%, across 25 of 27 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Capital Markets stock is the cheapest?
On price-to-book divided by return on equity — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Virtu Financial, Inc. screens cheapest at 0.06×. Only 21 of 27 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Is the Capital Markets sector beating the market?
Capital Markets has outperformed S&P 500 by 14.8% over the last 52 weeks and 0.6% over 13 weeks, measured on an equal-weight index of its current members. Inside the sector, 12 of 25 covered companies are beating the market on their own. Sector strength does not transfer evenly to every stock in it.
Which Capital Markets stock has the strongest price momentum?
Hut 8 Corp. has the strongest relative strength against S&P 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Capital Markets company scores highest for research priority?
Virtu Financial, Inc. scores 76.5 out of 100 with 60.2% evidence confidence, from 21 points on growth and earnings, 19.9 on capital efficiency, 16.5 on valuation and 19.1 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Capital Markets companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 27 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 6 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Capital Markets sector?
The 27 Capital Markets companies on this page carry $1,191,668 million of combined market value. Morgan Stanley is the largest at $332,604 million, about 28% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-28.
What is the Capital Markets sector's P/B ratio?
The median price-to-book ratio across the 27 Capital Markets companies on this page is 3.8×, measured on the 25 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-28.
How is the Capital Markets sector performing?
12 of the 25 covered Capital Markets companies are beating S&P 500 on Mansfield relative strength. The sector itself is 14.8% ahead of S&P 500 over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of its current members. Readings are as of 2026-07-28.
How many Capital Markets stocks are listed in the US?
This comparison covers 27 listed Capital Markets companies in the US, each above the size floor the site applies. The full ranked list is on this page, with reported fundamentals through Jun 2026. Membership is the full industry list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.