Trident Techlabs Ltd
TECHLABSTrident Techlabs Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +22.7% in a year against a −73.7% price move.
The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only 38% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch.
The price is in a downtrend (51 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 13th percentile of its own 2-year range. Underneath, the last four quarters read improving — profit +266.7% year on year, and 38% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash. What settles it: whether the cash starts following the profit.
Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.
Trident Techlabs Ltd trades at ₹167, in a downtrend and 51 weeks into that stage. That is −56.7% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 0% of a 52-week range of ₹167 to ₹608. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (20 weeks and counting).
Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 51 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹167 it trades −56.7% versus its 200-day average and sits at 0% of its 52-week range (₹167–₹608).
Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 2.2 years the stock moved +62% while the NIFTY 500 moved +8% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (20 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2025-11-07) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.
What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.
→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 13th percentile of its own range.
Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.
Trident Techlabs Ltd trades at 14.9× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 13% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 48.8×, measured across 2.2 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.
Today's P/E of 14.9× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 13% of the time, against a long-run median of 48.8× measured over 2.2 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.
One caveat before moving on: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. If profitability mean-reverts, today's multiple is higher than it looks.
Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +22.7% against a −73.7% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.
Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.
→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.
Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).
Trident Techlabs Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 4 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.
Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.
One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.
Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.
Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.
| 1yr | 3yr | 5yr | 10yr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | +5.5% | +36.9% | — | — |
| Profit | +33.3% | +128.9% | — | — |
| EPS | +22.7% | +42.1% | — | — |
| Share price | −73.7% | — | — | — |
→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.
4-Factor Sector Score
45.2/100 — rank 60 of 63 in IT - Software · 40% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers
Trident Techlabs Ltd scores 45.2 out of 100 against the 63 companies it is compared with in IT - Software, ranking 60. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
The four contributions add to the total exactly: 16.2 + 14.9 + 10.8 + 3.3 = 45.2. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.
What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.
Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.
Trident Techlabs Ltd reported ₹64.0 Cr of revenue in the Sep 25 quarter, +204.8% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at 28.8% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹77.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹205 Cr.
Trident Techlabs Ltd reported ₹64.0 Cr of revenue in the Sep 25 quarter, +204.8% year on year. Over 4 years it has compounded at 28.8% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹77.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹205 Cr.
FY25 revenue came in at ₹77.0 Cr (+5.5% on the year), capping 4 years at 28.8% compound. The latest quarter (Sep 25) printed ₹64.0 Cr, +204.8% year on year.
Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +241.5% growth against the decade's 28.8% — the current year is running faster than its own long-run rate.
→ Revenue grew — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: 27.0% this quarter (−2.0 pp YoY).
Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.
Trident Techlabs Ltd's operating margin is 27.0% in the Sep 25 quarter, −2.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved +45.0 percentage points. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 15.0% to 25.0%.
Trident Techlabs Ltd's operating margin is 27.0% in the Sep 25 quarter, −2.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across the last four quarters the operating margin has moved +45.0 percentage points. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 15.0% to 25.0%.
The latest quarter's operating margin is 27.0%, −2.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 15.0%–25.0%, and FY25's 25.0% is the top of that band — a record year.
Why the margin moved: operating margin went +44.7 pp year on year while gross margin went −34.1 pp — the gain came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.
Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.
→ Margins slipped — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit +266.7% in the latest quarter.
Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.
Trident Techlabs Ltd earned ₹11.0 Cr of net profit in the Sep 25 quarter, +266.7% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹12.0 Cr. That is 17.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹3.0 Cr.
Trident Techlabs Ltd earned ₹11.0 Cr of net profit in the Sep 25 quarter, +266.7% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹12.0 Cr. That is 17.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹3.0 Cr.
Sep 25 profit was ₹11.0 Cr, +266.7% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed ₹12.0 Cr (+33.3%).
→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 38% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.
Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.
Over the last 3 fiscal years 38% of Trident Techlabs Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — a gap worth watching. In FY25 that was ₹16.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹12.0 Cr of profit. After ₹3.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹13.0 Cr was left as free cash.
FY25: operating cash of ₹16.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹12.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹13.0 Cr after ₹3.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 38% of profit.
Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.
🚨 Why conversion sits at 38%: the cash cycle stretched 202 days between FY21 and FY25 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.
Router verdict: conversion is below par and the cash cycle has stretched 202 days — the next section's job is to find where the cash is stuck.
→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: the 124-day cycle, in money terms.
Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).
Trident Techlabs Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 124 days in FY25, up from −78 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹4.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY25 sales of ₹77.0 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.2 Cr, so roughly ₹26.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.
FY25: debtors at 302 days, inventory at 44 days — roughly 1.4 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 124 days, looser than FY21's −78.
The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 44 days to sell; customers pay about 302 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 222 days — netting out to the 124-day cycle.
In money terms: at FY25 sales of ₹77.0 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.2 Cr — so the 124-day loop keeps roughly ₹26.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.
On the investment side: capital spending of ₹4.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹2.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY25) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.
The synthesis: the working-capital loop is the cash sink the router flagged — watch the cycle, not the P&L.
→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is 27% and the ROIC − WACC spread is −1.4 pp.
Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.
Trident Techlabs Ltd earns a ROCE of 27% in FY25. That is up from a trough of 9% in FY22. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −1.4 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 15.6% net margin on 0.85× asset turns.
FY25 ROCE is 27%, recovered from a FY22 trough of 9% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.
🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 15.6% net margin × 0.85× asset turns × 1.57× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 20.8% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.
The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 10.6% − 12.0% = a −1.4 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.
→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 0.22.
Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.
Trident Techlabs Ltd carries ₹13.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹58.0 Cr of equity in FY25, a debt-to-equity of 0.22. Operating profit covers the interest bill 6×. Over 4 years borrowings went from ₹30.0 Cr to ₹13.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹4.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.
FY25: borrowings of ₹13.0 Cr against equity of ₹58.0 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.22. Operating profit covers the interest bill 6×. Over 4 years borrowings went from ₹30.0 Cr to ₹13.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹4.0 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.
→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: Domestic institutions cut 12.4 points over 4 quarters.
Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.
Domestic institutions cut 12.4 points of Trident Techlabs Ltd over 4 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes domestic institutions to 0.0% of the company. Foreign institutions moved −1.7 points over the same window, to 0.0%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.
The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: −12.4 points over 4 quarters to 0.0%; Foreign institutions: −1.7 points over 4 quarters to 0.0%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 4 quarters to 68.0%.
🚨 Why the register moved: domestic institutions drove it (−12.4 points), alongside foreign institutions (−1.7 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.
→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.
Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.
Trident Techlabs Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.
The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.
| Company | P/E | Mkt cap | Revenue | EPS | ROCE | Stage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trident Techlabs Ltd this page | 14.9× | ₹289 Cr | No read | |||
| Tata Consultancy Services Ltd | 15.2× | ₹8.2L Cr | Consistent | |||
| Infosys Ltd | 13.6× | ₹4.2L Cr | Consistent | |||
| HCL Technologies Ltd | 19.0× | ₹3.4L Cr | Mixed | |||
| Wipro Ltd | 13.3× | ₹1.8L Cr | Topping out | |||
| Tech Mahindra Ltd | 28.7× | ₹1.5L Cr | Topping out | |||
| LTM Ltd | 21.6× | ₹1.2L Cr | Consistent | |||
| Coforge Ltd | 40.0× | ₹65,726 Cr | Mixed | |||
| Mphasis Ltd | 22.6× | ₹43,674 Cr | Consistent | |||
| Hexaware Technologies Ltd | 23.0× | ₹33,719 Cr | No read | |||
| IDream Film Infrastructure Company Ltd | — | ₹17,180 Cr | No read | |||
| Zensar Technologies Ltd | 15.1× | ₹11,511 Cr | Turning around | |||
| Sonata Software Ltd | 15.8× | ₹8,079 Cr | Mixed | |||
| Tanla Platforms Ltd | 14.9× | ₹7,954 Cr | Turning around | |||
| Birlasoft Ltd | 14.8× | ₹7,896 Cr | Turning around | |||
| Seshaasai Technologies Ltd | 23.6× | ₹6,221 Cr | No read | |||
| ASM Technologies Ltd | 103.0× | ₹6,206 Cr | No read | |||
| AvenuesAI Ltd | 20.2× | ₹5,700 Cr | Mixed | |||
| Mastek Ltd | 12.0× | ₹5,242 Cr | Consistent | |||
| Datamatics Global Services Ltd | 20.3× | ₹4,856 Cr | Topping out | |||
| Aurionpro Solutions Ltd | 21.0× | ₹4,562 Cr | Mixed | |||
| Moschip Technologies Ltd | 141.0× | ₹4,508 Cr | Mixed | |||
| Capillary Technologies India Ltd | 128.0× | ₹3,790 Cr | — | — | — | — |
| TechNVision Ventures Ltd | 984.0× | ₹3,563 Cr | No read | |||
| Cigniti Technologies Ltd | 11.4× | ₹3,472 Cr | Mixed | |||
| 63 Moons Technologies Ltd | — | ₹3,264 Cr | No read | |||
| ASM Technologies Ltd | 52.8× | ₹3,220 Cr | No read | |||
| TechNVision Ventures Ltd | 14,485.0× | ₹3,187 Cr | No read | |||
| R Systems International Ltd | 12.6× | ₹2,909 Cr | Turning around | |||
| Sasken Technologies Ltd | 48.1× | ₹2,765 Cr | Improving | |||
| BLS E-Services Ltd | 44.6× | ₹2,565 Cr | Mixed | |||
| Silver Touch Technologies Ltd | 71.0× | ₹2,538 Cr | Turning around | |||
| Saksoft Ltd | 16.3× | ₹2,231 Cr | Mixed | |||
| Blue Cloud Softech Solutions Ltd | 31.2× | ₹1,889 Cr | Mixed | |||
| Hypersoft Technologies Ltd | 440.0× | ₹1,798 Cr | No read | |||
| Kody Technolab Ltd | 104.0× | ₹1,748 Cr | — | — | — | — |
| IZMO Ltd | 34.8× | ₹1,653 Cr | Improving | |||
| NINtec Systems Ltd | 50.3× | ₹1,610 Cr | Mixed | |||
| Dynacons Systems & Solutions Ltd | 18.6× | ₹1,580 Cr | Mixed | |||
| Magellanic Cloud Ltd | 13.6× | ₹1,568 Cr | Mixed |
Frequently asked questions
What is Trident Techlabs Ltd's share price today?
Trident Techlabs Ltd trades at ₹167, −73.7% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹289 Cr. The stock sits at 0% of its 52-week range of ₹167–₹608, −56.7% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a downtrend, 51 weeks in. — as of 24 July 2026.
What were Trident Techlabs Ltd's latest quarterly results?
Trident Techlabs Ltd reported revenue of ₹64.0 Cr and net profit of ₹11.0 Cr for the Sep 25 quarter. Revenue rose 204.8% and profit rose 266.7% year on year. Earnings per share were ₹6.59. The operating margin was 27.0%, 2.0 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 24 July 2026.
What is Trident Techlabs Ltd's revenue?
Trident Techlabs Ltd reported revenue of ₹64.0 Cr in the Sep 25 quarter, +204.8% year on year. For the full FY25 fiscal year, revenue was ₹77.0 Cr (+5.5%). Over the last 4 years revenue compounded at 28.8% a year. — as of 24 July 2026.
What is Trident Techlabs Ltd's profit?
Trident Techlabs Ltd earned ₹11.0 Cr of net profit in the Sep 25 quarter, +266.7% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹12.0 Cr. The operating margin ran 27.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 24 July 2026.
What is Trident Techlabs Ltd's market cap?
Trident Techlabs Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹289 Cr at a share price of ₹167. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 24 July 2026.
What is Trident Techlabs Ltd's P/E ratio?
Trident Techlabs Ltd trades at a P/E of 14.9×, at the 13th percentile of its own 2-year range, against a long-run median of 48.8×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 24 July 2026.
Is Trident Techlabs Ltd overvalued?
On its own history, Trident Techlabs Ltd looks cheap against its own history: its P/E of 14.9× has been cheaper only 13% of the time in 2 years (long-run median 48.8×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. One caveat: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. — as of 24 July 2026.
Is Trident Techlabs Ltd growing?
Yes — Trident Techlabs Ltd is growing: latest-quarter revenue +204.8% year on year, profit +266.7%, and the margin −2.0 pp at 27.0%. The earnings engine currently reads: improving — as of 24 July 2026.
How is Trident Techlabs Ltd performing?
Trident Techlabs Ltd is in a downtrend, 51 weeks in. Its latest quarter's revenue rose 204.8% and profit rose 266.7% year on year. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 20 weeks. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 24 July 2026.
Is Trident Techlabs Ltd in an uptrend?
No — the price is in a downtrend (week 51 of stage 4), trading −56.7% versus its 200-day average and at 0% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 24 July 2026.
Is Trident Techlabs Ltd beating the market?
Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view Trident Techlabs Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (20 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2025-11-07), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 2.2 years the stock moved +62% against the NIFTY 500's +8% — ahead of the index over the full window. — as of 24 July 2026.
Will Trident Techlabs Ltd's share price go up?
This page publishes no price forecast for Trident Techlabs Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹167, the price is in a downtrend 51 weeks in. Its P/E of 14.9× sits at the 13th percentile of its own 2-year range. — as of 24 July 2026.
Who owns Trident Techlabs Ltd?
Promoters hold 68.0% of Trident Techlabs Ltd, foreign institutions 0.0%, domestic institutions 0.0% and the public 32.0% (latest quarter). The biggest move on the register over the last two years: Domestic institutions cut 12.4 points over 4 quarters. — as of 24 July 2026.
Does Trident Techlabs Ltd have too much debt?
No — Trident Techlabs Ltd's debt-to-equity is 0.22, and operating profit covers the interest bill 6×. FY25 borrowings were ₹13.0 Cr against equity of ₹58.0 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 24 July 2026.
What is Trident Techlabs Ltd's capex?
Trident Techlabs Ltd spent ₹4.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY25 alone that was ₹3.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 24 July 2026.
What is Trident Techlabs Ltd's cash flow?
Trident Techlabs Ltd generated ₹16.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY25 and ₹13.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹3.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹12.0 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 24 July 2026.
Is Trident Techlabs Ltd's profit real cash?
Not fully — over the last 3 fiscal years, 38% of Trident Techlabs Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY25, operating cash was ₹16.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹12.0 Cr. The cash then goes mostly into the working-capital cycle. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 24 July 2026.
Where is Trident Techlabs Ltd in its business cycle?
Trident Techlabs Ltd's FY25 operating margin was 25.0%, against a 5-year band of 15.0%–25.0%: the top of the band — a record year. Record profitability is late-cycle territory: every ratio flatters at the top, and the story leans on margins holding. The latest quarter ran 27.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 24 July 2026.
What could break the Trident Techlabs Ltd story?
The sharpest disagreement: profits are rising, but only 38% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as operating cash — the gap between the P&L and the bank account is the thing to watch. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 24 July 2026.
Is Trident Techlabs Ltd a stock worth studying right now?
This is not investment advice. The machine read: Trident Techlabs Ltd's earnings have outrun its stock. EPS grew +22.7% in a year against a −73.7% price move. The sharpest open question: whether the cash starts following the profit. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 24 July 2026.