TechNVision Ventures Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

TechNVision Ventures Ltd trades at ₹5,673, in a confirmed uptrend and 31 weeks into that stage. That is +0.0% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 47% of a 52-week range of ₹3,657 to ₹7,915. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (4 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 31 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹5,673 it trades +0.0% versus its 200-day average and sits at 47% of its 52-week range (₹3,657–₹7,915).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.1 years the stock moved +6,067% while the NIFTY 500 moved +241% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (4 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-02-27) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 98th percentile of its own range.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

TechNVision Ventures Ltd trades at 984.0× P/E, about the priciest it has ever traded. Its long-run median P/E is 124.1×, measured across 10.1 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 984.0× is about the priciest it has ever traded, against a long-run median of 124.1× measured over 10.1 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

🚨 Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −99.2% against a −15.9% price move — the price outran earnings, pushing the multiple UP its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +100.7%/yr price move, ~+23.5%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+77.2 pp from the multiple (expanding); over 10y, of the +51.0%/yr price move, ~+23.7%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+27.3 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is full against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

TechNVision Ventures Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 9 quarters across 2 curves, on partial evidence.

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

No sector-relative score — TechNVision Ventures Ltd is not present in the sector comparison for IT - Software.

The score is a rank WITHIN a peer set: every metric is scored by percentile against the other members. Without the peer set there is no score to state, so none is invented here.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

TechNVision Ventures Ltd reported ₹74.4 Cr of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter, −8.1% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 21.0% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹228 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹242 Cr.

TechNVision Ventures Ltd reported ₹74.4 Cr of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter, −8.1% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 21.0% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹228 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹242 Cr.

FY25 revenue came in at ₹228 Cr (+18.1% on the year), capping 10 years at 21.0% compound. The latest quarter (Dec 25) printed ₹74.4 Cr, −8.1% year on year.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +1.4% growth against the decade's 21.0% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +0.6% over the last 4 quarters against +14.9%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over; TTM profit −63.1% vs −31.3%/yr — rolling over.

→ Revenue slipped — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: 6.4% this quarter (+4.3 pp YoY).

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

TechNVision Ventures Ltd's operating margin is 6.4% in the Dec 25 quarter, +4.3 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −7.0% to 12.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

TechNVision Ventures Ltd's operating margin is 6.4% in the Dec 25 quarter, +4.3 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −7.0% to 12.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 6.4%, +4.3 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −7.0%–12.0%.

Why the margin moved: operating margin went +4.3 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the gain came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

→ Margins held — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit +172.8% in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

TechNVision Ventures Ltd earned ₹3.7 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, +172.8% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹0.0 Cr. That is 5.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹1.4 Cr. 3 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

TechNVision Ventures Ltd earned ₹3.7 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, +172.8% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹0.0 Cr. That is 5.0% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹1.4 Cr. 3 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Dec 25 profit was ₹3.7 Cr, +172.8% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed ₹0.0 Cr (−100.0%).

Why profit moved: revenue contributed −8.1% and the margin +4.3 pp — the quarter was margin-led: most of the profit growth came from keeping more of each sale.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −11.7% vs revenue +1.4%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 103% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 103% of TechNVision Ventures Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY25 that was ₹16.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹0.0 Cr of profit. After ₹8.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹8.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of ₹16.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹0.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹8.0 Cr after ₹8.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 103% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

Why conversion sits at 103%: the cash cycle tightened 106 days between FY20 and FY25 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 2.6× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: ₹13.0 Cr of building over 3 years.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

TechNVision Ventures Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 61 days in FY25, down from 167 days in FY20. Capital spending ran ₹13.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY25 sales of ₹228 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.6 Cr, so roughly ₹38.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY25: debtors at 61 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 61 days, tighter than FY20's 167.

In money terms: at FY25 sales of ₹228 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.6 Cr — so the 61-day loop keeps roughly ₹38.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹13.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹5.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY25) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is 10%.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

TechNVision Ventures Ltd earns a ROCE of 10% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −725% in FY19. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 0.0% net margin on 1.29× asset turns.

FY25 ROCE is 10%, recovered from a FY19 trough of −725% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 0.0% net margin × 1.29× asset turns × 25.29× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 0.0% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 3.29.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

TechNVision Ventures Ltd carries ₹23.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹7.0 Cr of equity in FY25, a debt-to-equity of 3.29. Operating profit covers the interest bill 2×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹0.0 Cr to ₹23.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹13.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY25: borrowings of ₹23.0 Cr against equity of ₹7.0 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 3.29. Operating profit covers the interest bill 2×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹0.0 Cr to ₹23.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹13.0 Cr in just the last 3 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: the register is quiet.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

No holder of TechNVision Ventures Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 74.3%.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

TechNVision Ventures Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions