Eco Recycling Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Eco Recycling Ltd trades at ₹347, in a downtrend and 53 weeks into that stage. That is −34.1% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 0% of a 52-week range of ₹347 to ₹681. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (21 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 53 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹347 it trades −34.1% versus its 200-day average and sits at 0% of its 52-week range (₹347–₹681).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.0 years the stock moved +855% while the NIFTY 500 moved +260% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (21 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2025-10-10) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 48th percentile of its own range.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Eco Recycling Ltd trades at 38.1× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (48th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 40.9×, measured across 6.6 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 38.1× is mid-range by its own standards (48th percentile), against a long-run median of 40.9× measured over 6.6 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

One caveat before moving on: margins are the best this company has ever printed — cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap. If profitability mean-reverts, today's multiple is higher than it looks.

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved +269.6% against a −44.4% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +46.7%/yr price move, ~+33.8%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+12.9 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Eco Recycling Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — revenue and profit growth are shrinking while ROCE is still lifting at 37.0% — falling growth against firm returns, so no single stage word fits yet. The read is built from 9 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

No sector-relative score — Eco Recycling Ltd is not present in the sector comparison for Recycling.

The score is a rank WITHIN a peer set: every metric is scored by percentile against the other members. Without the peer set there is no score to state, so none is invented here.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Eco Recycling Ltd reported ₹5.9 Cr of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter, −40.4% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 3.6% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹44.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹39.3 Cr.

Eco Recycling Ltd reported ₹5.9 Cr of revenue in the Dec 25 quarter, −40.4% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 3.6% a year. The last full year, FY25, came in at ₹44.0 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹39.3 Cr.

FY25 revenue came in at ₹44.0 Cr (+57.1% on the year), capping 10 years at 3.6% compound. The latest quarter (Dec 25) printed ₹5.9 Cr, −40.4% year on year.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −6.5% growth against the decade's 3.6% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −6.9% over the last 4 quarters against +25.7%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over; TTM profit −21.0% vs +18.7%/yr — rolling over.

→ Revenue slipped — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: 59.6% this quarter (−7.2 pp YoY).

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Eco Recycling Ltd's operating margin is 59.6% in the Dec 25 quarter, −7.2 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −8.0% to 71.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

Eco Recycling Ltd's operating margin is 59.6% in the Dec 25 quarter, −7.2 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. That is the widest this company has ever printed on a full-year basis. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −8.0% to 71.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 59.6%, −7.2 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 12 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −8.0%–71.0%, and FY25's 71.0% is the top of that band — a record year.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −7.2 pp year on year while gross margin went +3.1 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

Worth repeating from the valuation section: cheap against its own history on record margins is not the same thing as cheap — a record margin flatters every ratio built on top of it.

→ Margins slipped — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit −56.8% in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Eco Recycling Ltd earned ₹2.0 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, −56.8% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹23.0 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 36.8%. That is 34.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹4.7 Cr. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Eco Recycling Ltd earned ₹2.0 Cr of net profit in the Dec 25 quarter, −56.8% year on year. Full-year FY25 profit was ₹23.0 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 36.8%. That is 34.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹4.7 Cr. 1 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making.

Dec 25 profit was ₹2.0 Cr, −56.8% year on year. On the full year, FY25 printed ₹23.0 Cr (+27.8%), and the 10-year compound rate is 36.8%.

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed −40.4% and the margin −7.2 pp — the quarter was revenue-led despite a thinner margin.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −13.9% vs revenue −6.5%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 64% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 64% of Eco Recycling Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — most of the profit is real cash. In FY25 that was ₹17.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹23.0 Cr of profit. After ₹21.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−4.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY25: operating cash of ₹17.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹23.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−4.0 Cr after ₹21.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 64% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

🚨 Why conversion sits at 64%: the cash cycle stretched 362 days between FY20 and FY25 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving. Less than 70% of profit arriving as cash is the thing to watch on this page.

Router verdict: conversion is below par and the cash cycle has stretched 362 days — the next section's job is to find where the cash is stuck.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: the 648-day cycle, in money terms.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Eco Recycling Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 648 days in FY25, up from 286 days in FY20. Capital spending ran ₹42.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY25 sales of ₹44.0 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.1 Cr, so roughly ₹78.0 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY25: debtors at 63 days, inventory at 652 days — roughly 21.4 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 648 days, looser than FY20's 286.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 652 days to sell; customers pay about 63 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 67 days — netting out to the 648-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY25 sales of ₹44.0 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.1 Cr — so the 648-day loop keeps roughly ₹78.0 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹42.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹3.0 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY25) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: the working-capital loop is the cash sink the router flagged — watch the cycle, not the P&L.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is 37%.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Eco Recycling Ltd earns a ROCE of 37% in FY25. That is up from a trough of −5% in FY09. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 52.3% net margin on 0.40× asset turns.

FY25 ROCE is 37%, recovered from a FY09 trough of −5% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY25): 52.3% net margin × 0.40× asset turns × 1.26× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 26.4% on equity. Margin is doing the heavy lifting; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 0.05.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Eco Recycling Ltd carries ₹4.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹88.0 Cr of equity in FY25, a debt-to-equity of 0.05. Operating profit covers the interest bill 31×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹17.0 Cr to ₹4.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹42.0 Cr across the last 3 of those years.

FY25: borrowings of ₹4.0 Cr against equity of ₹88.0 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.05. Operating profit covers the interest bill 31×. Over 5 years borrowings went from ₹17.0 Cr to ₹4.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹42.0 Cr in just the last 3 — the build-out is being paid for out of cash, not debt.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: the register is quiet.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

No holder of Eco Recycling Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. Domestic institutions moved +0.1 points over the same window, to 0.1%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −0.2 points over 8 quarters to 0.7%; Domestic institutions: +0.1 points over 8 quarters to 0.1%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 73.3%.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Eco Recycling Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions