Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd trades at ₹445, in a downtrend and 42 weeks into that stage. That is −10.1% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 23% of a 52-week range of ₹401 to ₹597. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (6 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 42 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹445 it trades −10.1% versus its 200-day average and sits at 23% of its 52-week range (₹401–₹597).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 5.5 years the stock moved +9% while the NIFTY 500 moved +99% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (6 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-19) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 36th percentile of its own range.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd trades at 16.3× P/E, mid-range by its own standards (36th percentile). Its long-run median P/E is 19.3×, measured across 5.6 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 16.3× is mid-range by its own standards (36th percentile), against a long-run median of 19.3× measured over 5.6 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −11.6% against a −30.8% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +4.6%/yr price move, ~+14.3%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−9.7 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

The PEG ratio and its quarterly curve, which only the second data source carries, are not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — no clean majority across the growth curves, ROCE slipping at 11.0% — the per-curve reads carry the story. The read is built from 10 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

42.2/100 — rank 8 of 9 in Recycling · 81% evidence confidence

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd scores 42.2 out of 100 against the 9 companies it is compared with in Recycling, ranking 8. Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 12.2 + 12.4 + 13.8 + 3.8 = 42.2. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd reported ₹286 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +17.7% year on year. That is the 6th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 17.0% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,053 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,053 Cr.

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd reported ₹286 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +17.7% year on year. That is the 6th straight quarter of year-on-year growth. Over 10 years it has compounded at 17.0% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹1,053 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹1,053 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹1,053 Cr (+12.7% on the year), capping 10 years at 17.0% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹286 Cr, +17.7% year on year — the 6th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged +12.8% growth against the decade's 17.0% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew +12.7% over the last 4 quarters against +9.8%/yr over the last 8 — stabilising; TTM profit −8.0% vs −4.6%/yr — rolling over.

→ Revenue grew — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: 20.0% this quarter (−1.0 pp YoY).

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd's operating margin is 20.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, −1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 11 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 17.0% to 30.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd's operating margin is 20.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, −1.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 11 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 17.0% to 30.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 20.0%, −1.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 11 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 17.0%–30.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −1.1 pp year on year while gross margin went +0.0 pp — the loss came mostly below the gross line: operating leverage, with costs spread over a bigger revenue base.

→ Margins slipped — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit −19.6% in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd earned ₹37.0 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −19.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹92.0 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 14.9%. That is 12.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹46.0 Cr.

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd earned ₹37.0 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, −19.6% year on year. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹92.0 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 14.9%. That is 12.9% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹46.0 Cr.

Mar 26 profit was ₹37.0 Cr, −19.6% year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹92.0 Cr (−8.9%), and the 10-year compound rate is 14.9%.

🚨 Why profit moved: revenue contributed +17.7% and the margin −1.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −3.4% vs revenue +12.8%. Profit is growing slower than sales — costs are eating the growth before it reaches the bottom line.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 160% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 160% of Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹139 Cr of operating cash against ₹92.0 Cr of profit. After ₹80.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹59.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹139 Cr against reported profit of ₹92.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹59.0 Cr after ₹80.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 160% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

Why conversion sits at 160%: the cash cycle stretched 42 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.

Router verdict: the bigger cash user is investment — capital spending ran 2.0× depreciation over three years, so the next section's job is to check what that build-out is buying.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: ₹421 Cr of building over 3 years.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 112 days in FY26, up from 70 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹421 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹1,053 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹2.9 Cr, so roughly ₹323 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 112 days (an asset-light business — no inventory to speak of) — for a full cycle of 112 days, looser than FY21's 70.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹1,053 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹2.9 Cr — so the 112-day loop keeps roughly ₹323 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹421 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹209 Cr of depreciation — the company is building well ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹29.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is 11% and the ROIC − WACC spread is −2.4 pp.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd earns a ROCE of 11% in FY26. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −2.4 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 8.7% net margin on 0.61× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 11%.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 8.7% net margin × 0.61× asset turns × 2.35× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 12.5% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 9.6% − 12.0% = a −2.4 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 0.62.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd carries total debt of ₹459 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹915 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.50. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.33 in FY22 to 0.50 in FY26. Read the returns elsewhere on this page with that leverage in mind.

Mar 26: total debt of ₹459 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹915 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.50. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.33 (FY22) to 0.50 (FY26). Read the returns on this page with that leverage in mind.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: Foreign institutions added 2.3 points over 8 quarters.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Foreign institutions added 2.3 points of Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 13.1% of the company. Domestic institutions moved −1.8 points over the same window, to 3.4%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: +2.3 points over 8 quarters to 13.1%; Domestic institutions: −1.8 points over 8 quarters to 3.4%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 46.1%.

Why the register moved: rotation — foreign institutions +2.3 points against domestic institutions −1.8 points over 8 quarters, with promoters holding steady — one class of institutions handing the register to the other, not a verdict change by the people closest to the numbers.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Antony Waste Handling Cell Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions