Megamont Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Megamont Ltd trades at ₹161, in a confirmed uptrend and 80 weeks into that stage. That is +45.7% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 82% of a 52-week range of ₹37 to ₹188. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (2 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 80 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹161 it trades +45.7% versus its 200-day average and sits at 82% of its 52-week range (₹37–₹188).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 9.8 years the stock moved +8,247% while the NIFTY 500 moved +211% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (2 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-03) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Megamont Ltd trades at 74.8× P/E, against too little history to rank. Its long-run median P/E is 79.6×, measured across 0.1 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 74.8× is against too little history to rank, against a long-run median of 79.6× measured over 0.1 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

Put together: the multiple is unremarkable against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read.

Megamont Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read.

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

4-Factor Sector Score

53.5/100 — rank 1 of 1 in Rubber - Products · 41% evidence confidence · provisional, ranked below fully-evidenced peers

Megamont Ltd scores 53.5 out of 100 against the 1 companies it is compared with in Rubber - Products, ranking 1. Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 16.6 + 14.4 + 10 + 12.5 = 53.5. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Megamont Ltd reported ₹287 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹601 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹601 Cr. A multi-year compound rate is not shown because the annual history behind it is too short to compute one honestly.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹601 Cr (null on the year). The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹287 Cr, null year on year.

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Megamont Ltd's operating margin is 1.0% in the Mar 26 quarter.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 1.0%, null pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 1 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 1.0%–1.0%.

Why: the numbers show the operating margin move clearly, but the cost lines behind it sit below what we hold — so we state the move without inventing its driver.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Megamont Ltd earned ₹3.6 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹6.0 Cr. That is 1.3% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier lost ₹0.03 Cr.

Mar 26 profit was ₹3.6 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹6.0 Cr (null).

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Megamont Ltd's cash-flow history is too thin to judge how much reported profit converts into cash. In FY26 that was ₹−69.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹6.0 Cr of profit. After ₹0.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−69.0 Cr was left as free cash. Cash resolution here is annual, because quarterly cash statements are not published.

FY26: operating cash of ₹−69.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹6.0 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−69.0 Cr after ₹0.0 Cr of capital spending.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

Router verdict: the visible cash user is investment — the next section checks what the spending is buying.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Megamont Ltd does not report the debtor, inventory and payable day-counts a cash cycle is built from, so this section reads the investment side instead. Capital spending ran ₹0.0 Cr over the last 1 years. Averaged over those years that is 0.0% of FY26 revenue a year.

Working-capital day-counts are not in our numbers for this stock, so this section reads the investment side — where the cash is being put to work.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹0.0 Cr over the last 1 fiscal years. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: the cash is going into capacity, not disappearing into the cycle — the question becomes whether the new capacity earns.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.

Megamont Ltd earns a ROCE of 24% in FY26. A return-on-invested-capital spread against the cost of capital is not computable from what is held here. The wiring behind it is 1.0% net margin on 6.39× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 24%.

Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 1.0% net margin × 6.39× asset turns × 2.61× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 16.7% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is a meaningful part of the equation.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings; interest cover says how many times operating profit pays the interest bill. Low and high, respectively, is the safe corner.

Megamont Ltd carries ₹51.0 Cr of borrowings against ₹36.0 Cr of equity in FY26, a debt-to-equity of 1.42. Operating profit covers the interest bill 3×. Over 1 years borrowings went from ₹2.0 Cr to ₹51.0 Cr. Capital spending ran ₹0.0 Cr across the last 1 of those years.

FY26: borrowings of ₹51.0 Cr against equity of ₹36.0 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 1.42. Operating profit covers the interest bill 3×. Over 1 years borrowings went from ₹2.0 Cr to ₹51.0 Cr while capital spending ran ₹0.0 Cr in just the last 1 — part of the build-out is riding on borrowed money.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Promoters added 28.4 points of Megamont Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes promoters to 58.5% of the company. Domestic institutions moved −1.2 points over the same window, to 1.3%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Promoters: +28.4 points over 8 quarters to 58.5%; Domestic institutions: −1.2 points over 8 quarters to 1.3%.

Why the register moved: promoters drove it (+28.4 points), absorbed on the other side by domestic institutions (−1.2 points) — steady accumulation by institutions reading the same numbers this page reads.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Megamont Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions