Is the Pre-Engineering Buildings sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 0 of 3 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500.
20-quarter listed-company comparison
Pre-Engineering Buildings Stocks in India
Pre-Engineering Buildings: Pennar Industries Ltd owns the largest revenue base; EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the fastest current growth.
Nifty Pre-Engineering Buildings Index — Constituents & Performance
The Pre-Engineering Buildings companies below are the listed Indian Pre-Engineering Buildings universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Pre-Engineering Buildings index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.
The sector itself · before any single company
How has Pre-Engineering Buildings moved against NIFTY 500?
The line below covers 5.1 years. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 2% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies grew 18% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 10 weeks running.
FADING · −2 in 4w~Moving with the index2 of 5 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months1 is 20% or more behind over a year while earnings grew 20% or more
RS ↑10w · 2/5 >200d (+1) · 2/5 lead (−2) · EPS 3/5↑
Pre-Engineering Buildings, equal-weighted, based at 200
NIFTY 500, same base, same start
trailing 12-month earnings per share rising
falling
Strength anatomy
Moving without the scoresHow much of the sector is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together2 of 5 stocks moving
Fresh0 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score −6 vs the sector average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large
0/10
Mid
1/2−1
Small
1/2−1
Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 5 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is Pre-Engineering Buildings outperforming NIFTY 500?
The 52-week comparison of Pre-Engineering Buildings against NIFTY 500 is not available from the current market series. 0 of 3 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +19.6%.
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
0/3Stocks leading NIFTY 500
1/3Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: — as of latest available · unclassified · direction unavailable.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 0 of 3 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500. Pennar Industries Ltd leads with revenue of ₹3,621 crore, based on 5 of 5 comparable companies through Mar 2026. EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 34.5%, across 5 of 5 comparable companies.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company is largest by revenue?
Pennar Industries Ltd leads with revenue of ₹3,621 crore, based on 5 of 5 comparable companies through Mar 2026.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company is growing fastest?
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the fastest current revenue growth at 34.5%, across 5 of 5 comparable companies.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd ranks first at 71.7/100 with 84% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company reports the most CAPEX?
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd reports the largest latest CAPEX at ₹11 crore, with 2 of 5 companies comparable.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company has the least gross debt?
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd has the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹18 crore. Pennar Industries Ltd has the highest at ₹1,162 crore.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company has the lowest comparable PEG?
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.43, among 3 of 5 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this Pre-Engineering Buildings comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Mar 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
5
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹10.3K Cr
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd
Revenue growing
4/5
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
0/3
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Growth & earnings · 35%Capital efficiency · 25%Valuation · 20%Relative strength · 20%
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 84% evidence confidence.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. PEG is guarded: positive earnings, positive 5–60% three-year EPS growth, and a positive P/E are required.
1. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
71.7/100 · Favorable setup · 84% evidence
Exact sum: 26.3 + 18.4 + 15 + 12 = 71.7
Decision use: Confirmed research leader: earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength agree. Move to management, catalyst and risk diligence.
26.3/35Growth & earnings
Revenue 30.6% · PAT 24.1% · OPM change -1 pp
100% evidence
18.4/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 22.8% · debt/equity 0.02×
100% evidence
15.0/20Valuation
P/E 22× · PEG 0.53
50% evidence
12.0/20Relative strength
RS sector 19.6% · RS bench -10.5% · 1Y -16.3%
70% evidence
2. EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
67.5/100 · Favorable setup · 70% evidence
Exact sum: 25.6 + 16.9 + 15 + 10 = 67.5
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
25.6/35Growth & earnings
Revenue 34.5% · PAT 55.9% · OPM change -1 pp
100% evidence
16.9/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 21.7% · debt/equity 0.16×
100% evidence
15.0/20Valuation
P/E 27.4× · PEG 0.43
50% evidence
10.0/20Relative strength
RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y —
0% evidence
3. M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL
51.6/100 · Thin evidence · provisional · 57% evidence
Exact sum: 13.2 + 18.4 + 10 + 10 = 51.6
Decision use: Fill the missing evidence before acting; the ranking is deliberately pulled toward neutral.
13.2/35Growth & earnings
Revenue 27.5% · PAT 17.9% · OPM change -3 pp
95% evidence
18.4/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 23% · debt/equity 0.13×
95% evidence
10.0/20Valuation
P/E 18.1× · PEG —
0% evidence
10.0/20Relative strength
RS sector — · RS bench — · 1Y -25.6%
0% evidence
4. Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
45.2/100 · Mixed-negative evidence · 91% evidence
Exact sum: 18.1 + 11.3 + 12.8 + 3 = 45.2
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
18.1/35Growth & earnings
Revenue 12.2% · PAT 16.8% · OPM change 1 pp
100% evidence
11.3/25Capital efficiency
ROCE 15.3% · debt/equity 1×
100% evidence
12.8/20Valuation
P/E 15.9× · PEG 0.91
85% evidence
3.0/20Relative strength
RS sector -5.5% · RS bench -14.5% · 1Y -31%
70% evidence
5. Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND
24.2/100 · Adverse evidence · 77% evidence
Exact sum: 2.4 + 3.3 + 10 + 8.5 = 24.2
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
2.4/35Growth & earnings
Revenue -17.8% · PAT -80% · OPM change -10 pp
95% evidence
3.3/25Capital efficiency
ROCE -8.5% · debt/equity 0.46×
95% evidence
10.0/20Valuation
P/E — · PEG —
0% evidence
8.5/20Relative strength
RS sector -4.3% · RS bench -1.3% · 1Y -16.5%
100% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Revenue Scale & Growth Durability
Pennar Industries Ltd has the highest Revenue among the 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies compared here, at ₹3,621 crore. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd is next at ₹1,899 crore. EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the highest Revenue growth at 34.5%, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Pennar Industries Ltd is the scale leader at ₹3,621 crore, 90.7% ahead of Interarch Building Solutions Ltd. EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd's growth is 34.5% from a ₹1,525 crore base, with 8 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderPennar Industries Ltd · ₹3,621 crore
Gap90.7% versus #2 · Interarch Building Solutions Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 62 observations
Investor read: Pennar Industries Ltd is the scale benchmark; EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: Pennar Industries Ltd's growth falls below EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
Revenue is compared on a common reported-currency basis. Growth is year-on-year, so seasonality does not masquerade as progress.
Revenuelargest
1Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND₹3.6K Cr
2Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH₹1.9K Cr
3EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB₹1.5K Cr
4Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified₹1.4K Cr
5M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified₹1.3K Cr
Revenue growthfastest growers
1EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB35%
2Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH31%
3M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified28%
4Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND12%
5Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified-18%
Revenue · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Revenue | Revenue growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND | ₹925 Cr | 2.1% | Mar 2026 |
| Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH | ₹504 Cr | 8.6% | Mar 2026 |
| EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB | ₹471 Cr | 42% | Mar 2026 |
| M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified | ₹364 Cr | 16% | Mar 2026 |
| Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified | ₹327 Cr | -28% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Revenue · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹269 Cr
₹268 Cr
₹266 Cr
₹331 Cr
₹295 Cr
₹434 Cr
₹325 Cr
₹471 Cr
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹392 Cr
₹446 Cr
₹484 Cr
₹308 Cr
₹352 Cr
₹432 Cr
₹522 Cr
₹377 Cr
₹371 Cr
₹453 Cr
₹501 Cr
₹306 Cr
₹283 Cr
₹327 Cr
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹294 Cr
₹298 Cr
₹316 Cr
₹385 Cr
₹303 Cr
₹323 Cr
₹364 Cr
₹464 Cr
₹381 Cr
₹491 Cr
₹523 Cr
₹504 Cr
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹140 Cr
₹207 Cr
₹328 Cr
₹314 Cr
₹238 Cr
₹307 Cr
₹352 Cr
₹364 Cr
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
₹488 Cr
₹552 Cr
₹533 Cr
₹693 Cr
₹700 Cr
₹834 Cr
₹692 Cr
₹668 Cr
₹749 Cr
₹814 Cr
₹745 Cr
₹823 Cr
₹733 Cr
₹748 Cr
₹840 Cr
₹906 Cr
₹846 Cr
₹907 Cr
₹943 Cr
₹925 Cr
Revenue growth · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9.7%
62%
22%
42%
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-10%
-3.1%
7.9%
22%
5.4%
4.9%
-4.0%
-19%
-24%
-28%
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.1%
8.4%
15%
21%
26%
52%
44%
8.6%
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
70%
48%
7.3%
16%
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
—
—
—
—
43%
51%
30%
-3.6%
7.0%
-2.4%
7.7%
23%
-2.1%
-8.1%
13%
10%
15%
21%
12%
2.1%
02 · compare level, then change
Operating Economics & Margin Trend
Pennar Industries Ltd has the highest OPM among the 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies compared here, at 11%. EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd is next at 10%. The same company also holds the highest Margin change, at +1 percentage points. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Pennar Industries Ltd leads both opm at 11% and margin change at +1 percentage points.
LeaderPennar Industries Ltd · 11%
Gap10% versus #2 · EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 68 observations
Investor read: Pennar Industries Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current margin change signal.
Operating margin compares operating profit with revenue. Improvement is measured in percentage points, not percentage growth.
OPMhighest
1Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND11%
2EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB10%
3Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH10%
4M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified10%
5Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified-8.0%
Margin changefastest expanders
1Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND+1.0 pp
2EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB−1.0 pp
3Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH−1.0 pp
4M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified−3.0 pp
5Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified−10.0 pp
Operating margin · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | OPM | Margin change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND | 11% | +1.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH | 10% | −1.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB | 10% | −1.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified | 10% | −3.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified | -8.0% | −10.0 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
OPM · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
10%
10%
10%
11%
10%
12%
10%
10%
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
9.9%
3.3%
4.6%
2.3%
7.5%
1.8%
5.0%
2.0%
4.0%
-1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
5.0%
0.0%
-2.0%
2.0%
3.0%
-3.0%
-7.0%
-8.0%
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9.0%
6.0%
9.0%
10%
9.0%
8.0%
10%
11%
8.0%
8.0%
10%
10%
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
10%
19%
10%
13%
12%
11%
11%
10%
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
7.7%
7.3%
8.0%
7.3%
6.4%
5.5%
8.0%
10%
8.0%
9.0%
10%
8.0%
10%
10%
9.0%
10%
10%
9.0%
9.0%
11%
Margin change · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.0 pp
+2.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
−2.3 pp
−8.1 pp
−0.6 pp
−5.7 pp
−2.4 pp
−1.5 pp
+0.4 pp
−0.3 pp
−3.5 pp
−2.8 pp
−3.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
−4.0 pp
−1.0 pp
−2.0 pp
−3.0 pp
−5.0 pp
−10.0 pp
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
+1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+2.0 pp
−8.0 pp
+1.0 pp
−3.0 pp
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
+17.3 pp
−0.5 pp
0.0 pp
−0.9 pp
−1.3 pp
−1.8 pp
+0.0 pp
+2.7 pp
+1.6 pp
+3.5 pp
+2.0 pp
−2.0 pp
+2.0 pp
+1.0 pp
−1.0 pp
+2.0 pp
0.0 pp
−1.0 pp
0.0 pp
+1.0 pp
03 · compare level, then change
Profit Scale & Acceleration
Pennar Industries Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies compared here, at ₹139 crore. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd is next at ₹134 crore. EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the highest Profit growth at 55.9%, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Pennar Industries Ltd leads with ₹139 crore of TTM profit, 3.7% above Interarch Building Solutions Ltd. EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd shows 55.9% growth from a ₹92 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderPennar Industries Ltd · ₹139 crore
Gap3.7% versus #2 · Interarch Building Solutions Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 62 observations
Investor read: Pennar Industries Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is the residual after operating costs, interest and tax. Growth off a loss or near-zero base is excluded from the fastest-grower rank.
Net profitlargest
1Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND₹139 Cr
2Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH₹134 Cr
3EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB₹92 Cr
4M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified₹92 Cr
5Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified₹-101 Cr
Profit growthfastest growers
1EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB56%
2Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH24%
3M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified18%
4Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND17%
5Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified-80%
Net profit · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Net profit | Profit growth | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND | ₹41 Cr | 14% | Mar 2026 |
| Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH | ₹37 Cr | -5.1% | Mar 2026 |
| EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB | ₹30 Cr | 50% | Mar 2026 |
| M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified | ₹27 Cr | -6.9% | Mar 2026 |
| Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified | ₹-47 Cr | -688% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Net profit · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹13 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹30 Cr
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹5 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹-6 Cr
₹1 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹16 Cr
₹-12 Cr
₹-15 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹-18 Cr
₹-38 Cr
₹-47 Cr
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹19 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹28 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹37 Cr
₹37 Cr
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹7 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹27 Cr
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
₹6 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹14 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹24 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹25 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹26 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹30 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹41 Cr
Profit growth · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
23%
107%
42%
50%
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-80%
-62%
-11%
—
-1,600%
60%
-88%
—
—
-688%
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
5.3%
40%
27%
30%
40%
52%
32%
-5.1%
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
157%
-8.3%
39%
-6.9%
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
—
—
—
—
133%
113%
91%
41%
57%
29%
19%
21%
18%
23%
20%
24%
23%
19%
13%
14%
04 · compare level, then change
Capacity Spending & Returns On It
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the highest CAPEX among the 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies compared here, at ₹11 crore. M & B Engineering Ltd is next at ₹4 crore. The same company also holds the highest CAPEX intensity, at 2.5%. 2 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd reports ₹11 crore of CAPEX; EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the highest covered intensity at 2.5%. Coverage is only 2 of 5 companies and 5 reported observations, so this is partial evidence—not a complete sector rank.
LeaderEPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · ₹11 crore
Gap175% versus #2 · M & B Engineering Ltd
Persistence4/4 recent comparable periods
Coverage2/5 companies · 5 observations
Investor read: Use the CAPEX rank as a diligence queue. Verify commissioning, utilization, cash conversion and post-investment ROCE before treating spend as value creation.
This conclusion weakens if: CAPEX rises without higher utilization, operating cash flow or incremental returns.
CAPEX is cash spent on property, plant, equipment and other reported capital assets. CAPEX intensity divides that spend by revenue; high intensity is a reinvestment signal, not proof that the reinvestment will earn attractive returns.
CAPEXlargest spenders
1EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB₹11 Cr
2M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified₹4 Cr
CAPEX intensityhighest reinvestment intensity
1EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB2.5%
2M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified1.3%
Capital expenditure · company comparison
2/5 level · 2/5 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | CAPEX | CAPEX intensity | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB | ₹11 Cr | 2.5% | Mar 2026 |
| M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified | ₹4 Cr | 1.3% | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
CAPEX · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹9 Cr
₹9 Cr
—
—
₹11 Cr
₹11 Cr
—
—
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹4 Cr
—
—
—
—
CAPEX intensity · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.3%
3.4%
—
—
3.7%
2.5%
—
—
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.3%
—
—
—
—
Annual capital allocation · 10-year view
5/5 capacity base · 5/5 OCF · 5/5 CAPEX · 5/5 FCF
Capacity base is net fixed assets plus capital work in progress, straight off the reported balance sheet. It is not cash spent, so it answers a narrower question than CAPEX — but it is reported for companies whose cash-flow CAPEX is not published, which is why it leads here. Missing years remain blank; annual values are never relabelled as quarters.
Full annual capacity base, operating cash flow, CAPEX and free cash flow history
Capacity base · net fixed assets + CWIP · fiscal-year history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
₹73 Cr
₹76 Cr
₹148 Cr
₹155 Cr
₹238 Cr
₹307 Cr
₹417 Cr
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
₹363 Cr
₹362 Cr
₹363 Cr
₹380 Cr
₹368 Cr
₹417 Cr
₹414 Cr
₹479 Cr
₹574 Cr
₹554 Cr
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
₹77 Cr
₹86 Cr
₹164 Cr
₹155 Cr
₹160 Cr
₹179 Cr
₹231 Cr
₹344 Cr
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
₹69 Cr
₹74 Cr
₹71 Cr
₹81 Cr
₹143 Cr
₹178 Cr
₹194 Cr
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
₹453 Cr
₹369 Cr
₹572 Cr
₹659 Cr
₹664 Cr
₹720 Cr
₹739 Cr
₹915 Cr
₹1.0K Cr
₹1.2K Cr
Operating cash flow · fiscal-year history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
₹17 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹2 Cr
₹72 Cr
₹62 Cr
₹136 Cr
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
₹58 Cr
₹148 Cr
₹35 Cr
₹56 Cr
₹264 Cr
₹32 Cr
₹-168 Cr
₹182 Cr
₹-90 Cr
₹109 Cr
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
₹63 Cr
₹39 Cr
₹26 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹82 Cr
₹54 Cr
₹-19 Cr
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
₹48 Cr
₹8 Cr
₹41 Cr
₹29 Cr
₹5 Cr
₹36 Cr
₹-31 Cr
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
₹-19 Cr
₹-2 Cr
₹174 Cr
₹191 Cr
₹-43 Cr
₹195 Cr
₹244 Cr
₹225 Cr
₹256 Cr
₹202 Cr
CAPEX · reported cash flow · fiscal-year history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
₹9 Cr
₹79 Cr
₹17 Cr
₹96 Cr
₹86 Cr
₹133 Cr
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
₹29 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹22 Cr
₹41 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹78 Cr
₹31 Cr
₹97 Cr
₹134 Cr
₹21 Cr
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
₹14 Cr
₹87 Cr
₹3 Cr
₹12 Cr
₹27 Cr
₹64 Cr
₹127 Cr
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
₹14 Cr
₹7 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹71 Cr
₹48 Cr
₹31 Cr
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
₹11 Cr
₹-55 Cr
₹231 Cr
₹130 Cr
₹53 Cr
₹110 Cr
₹84 Cr
₹242 Cr
₹154 Cr
₹331 Cr
Free cash flow · fiscal-year history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
₹8 Cr
₹-50 Cr
₹-15 Cr
₹-24 Cr
₹-24 Cr
₹3 Cr
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
₹29 Cr
₹125 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹15 Cr
₹251 Cr
₹-46 Cr
₹-199 Cr
₹85 Cr
₹-224 Cr
₹88 Cr
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
₹49 Cr
₹-48 Cr
₹23 Cr
₹19 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹-10 Cr
₹-146 Cr
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
₹-6 Cr
₹34 Cr
₹9 Cr
₹-66 Cr
₹-12 Cr
₹-62 Cr
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
₹-30 Cr
₹53 Cr
₹-57 Cr
₹61 Cr
₹-96 Cr
₹85 Cr
₹160 Cr
₹-17 Cr
₹102 Cr
₹-129 Cr
05 · compare level, then change
Debt Load & Balance-Sheet Headroom
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd has the lowest Gross debt among the 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies compared here, at ₹18 crore. M & B Engineering Ltd is next at ₹84 crore. M & B Engineering Ltd has the lowest Net debt at ₹195 crore net cash, so level and change sit with different companies.
What the numbers say: M & B Engineering Ltd has the clearest covered balance-sheet capacity with ₹195 crore net cash and gross debt of ₹84 crore. Absolute debt alone does not identify the strongest balance sheet because company scale differs; net debt and debt-to-equity carry more information.
LeaderInterarch Building Solutions Ltd · ₹18 crore
Gap78.6% versus #2 · M & B Engineering Ltd
Persistence8/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 72 observations
Investor read: Prioritize net-cash capacity and leverage relative to operating scale, not the smallest absolute rupee debt.
This conclusion weakens if: Net debt rises faster than revenue and profit for two consecutive reported periods.
Gross debt shows contractual borrowings. Net debt subtracts reported cash; a negative value means net cash. Lower debt can create capacity, but should be read against the scale and capital intensity of the business.
Gross debtlowest gross debt
1Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH₹18 Cr
2M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified₹84 Cr
3EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB₹115 Cr
4Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified₹227 Cr
5Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND₹1.2K Cr
Net debtlowest net debt
1M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified₹-195 Cr
2EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB₹-194 Cr
3Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH₹-77 Cr
4Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified₹182 Cr
5Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND₹891 Cr
Debt and balance-sheet capacity · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Gross debt | Net debt | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND | ₹1.2K Cr | ₹891 Cr | Mar 2026 |
| Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified | ₹227 Cr | ₹182 Cr | Mar 2026 |
| EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB | ₹115 Cr | ₹-194 Cr | Mar 2026 |
| M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified | ₹84 Cr | ₹-195 Cr | Mar 2026 |
| Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH | ₹18 Cr | ₹-77 Cr | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Gross debt · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
₹76 Cr
—
—
—
₹109 Cr
—
—
—
₹150 Cr
—
₹197 Cr
—
₹216 Cr
₹215 Cr
₹222 Cr
₹222 Cr
₹115 Cr
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
₹8 Cr
₹7 Cr
₹7 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹55 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹51 Cr
₹113 Cr
₹113 Cr
₹54 Cr
₹54 Cr
₹96 Cr
₹96 Cr
₹300 Cr
₹300 Cr
₹265 Cr
₹265 Cr
₹309 Cr
₹309 Cr
₹227 Cr
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
₹8 Cr
—
—
—
₹18 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹10 Cr
—
₹13 Cr
₹13 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹20 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹11 Cr
₹18 Cr
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
₹100 Cr
—
—
—
₹149 Cr
—
—
—
₹205 Cr
₹205 Cr
—
₹144 Cr
₹191 Cr
₹191 Cr
₹114 Cr
₹114 Cr
₹84 Cr
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
₹565 Cr
₹635 Cr
₹635 Cr
₹646 Cr
₹645 Cr
₹736 Cr
₹736 Cr
₹685 Cr
₹685 Cr
₹736 Cr
₹736 Cr
₹785 Cr
₹785 Cr
₹852 Cr
₹852 Cr
₹812 Cr
₹812 Cr
₹993 Cr
₹993 Cr
₹1.2K Cr
Net debt · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹183 Cr
—
₹61 Cr
₹61 Cr
₹-282 Cr
₹-282 Cr
₹-194 Cr
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
₹-124 Cr
₹-31 Cr
₹-31 Cr
₹-110 Cr
₹-110 Cr
₹-7 Cr
₹-7 Cr
₹99 Cr
₹99 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹18 Cr
₹21 Cr
₹33 Cr
₹276 Cr
₹276 Cr
₹255 Cr
₹254 Cr
₹301 Cr
₹301 Cr
₹182 Cr
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹-52 Cr
₹-51 Cr
—
₹-58 Cr
₹-57 Cr
₹-366 Cr
₹-366 Cr
₹-149 Cr
₹-184 Cr
₹-174 Cr
₹-174 Cr
₹-77 Cr
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
₹132 Cr
—
₹125 Cr
₹161 Cr
₹161 Cr
₹67 Cr
₹67 Cr
₹-195 Cr
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
₹492 Cr
₹602 Cr
₹602 Cr
₹562 Cr
₹513 Cr
₹614 Cr
₹614 Cr
₹515 Cr
₹485 Cr
₹551 Cr
₹551 Cr
₹676 Cr
₹624 Cr
₹668 Cr
₹668 Cr
₹669 Cr
₹621 Cr
₹807 Cr
₹807 Cr
₹891 Cr
06 · compare level, then change
Return On Capital Employed
M & B Engineering Ltd has the highest ROCE among the 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies compared here, at 23%. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd is next at 22.8%. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd has the highest ROCE change at +1.5 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its ROCE series carries 6 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: M & B Engineering Ltd leads ROCE at 23%, 0.2 percentage points above Interarch Building Solutions Ltd. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd has the strongest latest improvement at +1.5 percentage points. Read the leader beside the density of its reported history: a sparse high return is a candidate; a repeated high return is evidence of durability.
LeaderM & B Engineering Ltd · 23%
Gap0.9% versus #2 · Interarch Building Solutions Ltd
Persistence1/2 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 52 observations
Investor read: M & B Engineering Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roce change signal.
ROCE asks how much operating return the business earns on the capital employed. Direction matters, but a single exceptional year should not be mistaken for durability.
ROCEhighest
1M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified23%
2Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH23%
3EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB22%
4Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND15%
5Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified-8.5%
ROCE changefastest improvers
1Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH+1.5 pp
2EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB−2.3 pp
3Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND−2.3 pp
4Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified−10.3 pp
5M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified−11.7 pp
Return on capital · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | ROCE | ROCE change | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified | 19% | −11.7 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH | 18% | +1.5 pp | Mar 2026 |
| EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB | 18% | −2.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND | 17% | −2.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
| Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified | -11% | −10.3 pp | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
ROCE · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
15%
—
20%
22%
16%
25%
18%
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
—
12%
—
7.5%
—
6.0%
—
5.4%
—
2.2%
7.5%
1.3%
5.0%
1.7%
1.4%
-1.1%
-0.1%
-3.6%
-4.6%
-11%
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
9.8%
—
23%
26%
17%
25%
17%
26%
18%
25%
18%
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
22%
31%
37%
20%
29%
19%
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
—
12%
—
13%
—
14%
—
17%
—
20%
25%
19%
25%
19%
25%
20%
25%
19%
24%
17%
ROCE change · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+1.8 pp
—
−2.3 pp
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
−5.8 pp
—
−2.1 pp
—
−3.8 pp
—
−4.1 pp
—
−0.5 pp
−6.1 pp
−2.4 pp
−5.1 pp
−5.3 pp
−6.0 pp
−10.3 pp
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+6.8 pp
—
−6.7 pp
−0.8 pp
+1.4 pp
+0.2 pp
+1.5 pp
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
+7.4 pp
−11.7 pp
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
—
—
—
—
—
+1.7 pp
—
+3.2 pp
—
+6.4 pp
—
+2.8 pp
—
−1.0 pp
+0.1 pp
+0.3 pp
0.0 pp
−0.2 pp
−0.5 pp
−2.3 pp
07 · compare level, then change
Valuation Against Growth & Quality
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the lowest Guarded PEG among the 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies compared here, at 0.43×. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd is next at 0.53×. Pennar Industries Ltd has the lowest P/E at 15.9×, so level and change sit with different companies. 3 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the lowest comparable Guarded PEG at 0.43×, 18.9% below Interarch Building Solutions Ltd. Only 3 of 5 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderEPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · 0.43×
Gap18.9% versus #2 · Interarch Building Solutions Ltd
Persistence0/2 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/5 companies · 19 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/e signal.
PEG is shown only when earnings are positive and three-year EPS growth is between 5% and 60%. It is recomputed consistently as the trailing P/E divided by that growth rate — reported earnings, never an expected-earnings multiple. On Indian companies it is shown only where the two data sources reconciled. A missing PEG is more honest than a low-base fiction.
Guarded PEGlowest PEG
1EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB0.4
2Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH0.5
3Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND0.9
P/Elowest P/E
1Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND15.9
2M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified18.1
3Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH22.0
4EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB27.4
Valuation · company comparison
3/5 level · 4/5 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | Guarded PEG | P/E | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND | 0.9 | 13.8 | Mar 2026 |
| Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH | 0.5 | 20.7 | Mar 2026 |
| EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB | 0.4 | 14.3 | Mar 2026 |
| M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified | — | 12.7 | Mar 2026 |
| Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified | — | -49.4 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
Guarded PEG · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.2
0.4
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.7
3.0
2.3
1.8
0.7
1.0
0.5
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
0.9
0.7
0.9
1.2
0.9
1.3
1.2
1.0
0.9
P/E · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
30.2
14.3
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
9.9
12.4
17.7
22.6
18.3
24.6
32.7
33.5
34.7
52.5
90.7
83.2
152.2
123.2
149.3
128.6
-49.4
—
—
—
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
23.5
30.4
24.9
35.9
30.3
30.6
20.7
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
21.8
22.9
12.7
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
8.8
14.3
14.2
11.7
11.7
12.0
13.6
14.2
13.9
18.2
18.9
19.2
23.1
22.4
25.0
22.6
26.1
25.4
20.6
13.8
08 · compare level, then change
Enterprise Value & Book Value
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the lowest EV/EBITDA among the 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies compared here, at 6.4×. Pennar Industries Ltd is next at 6.9×. Everest Industries Ltd has the lowest P/BV at 1.68×, so level and change sit with different companies. 5 of 5 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd leads ev/ebitda at 6.4×; Everest Industries Ltd leads p/bv at 1.68×.
LeaderEPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · 6.4×
Gap7.2% versus #2 · Pennar Industries Ltd
Persistence0/2 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/5 companies · 52 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
EV/EBITDA includes debt in enterprise value and is useful across different capital structures. P/BV prices the company against its own book. Both are market multiples on reported figures, not intrinsic-value estimates and not forecasts.
EV/EBITDAlowest EV/EBITDA
1EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB6.4
2Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND6.9
3M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified8.4
4Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH13.5
5Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified66.5
P/BVlowest P/BV
1Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified1.7
2Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND1.9
3M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified2.6
4Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH3.4
5EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB3.5
Enterprise and book valuation · company comparison
5/5 level · 5/5 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
| Company | EV/EBITDA | P/BV | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTIND⚠ unverified | 66.5 | 0.8 | Mar 2026 |
| Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCH | 13.5 | 3.6 | Mar 2026 |
| M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified | 8.4 | 2.2 | Mar 2026 |
| Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND | 6.9 | 1.7 | Mar 2026 |
| EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEB | 6.4 | 1.9 | Mar 2026 |
Full 20-quarter history · every available company
EV/EBITDA · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16.3
6.4
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
5.2
4.7
7.6
9.9
7.0
10.6
12.8
11.3
12.6
20.6
27.7
22.9
33.4
26.4
24.2
22.1
20.2
41.0
46.1
66.5
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
16.6
20.0
15.9
25.9
18.9
20.3
13.5
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
14.7
15.1
8.4
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
7.2
5.8
6.4
6.0
5.6
5.9
6.3
6.3
6.3
7.4
8.0
7.9
8.9
9.2
10.4
9.8
10.8
10.5
9.3
6.9
P/BV · reported quarter history
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd · EPACKPEB
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
4.0
1.9
Everest Industries Ltd · EVERESTIND⚠ unverified
1.2
1.4
1.6
2.1
1.6
2.0
2.2
2.2
2.7
3.0
3.7
2.8
3.2
2.8
2.0
1.1
1.4
1.8
1.5
0.8
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd · INTERARCH
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.5
4.3
3.7
4.9
4.3
4.9
3.6
M & B Engineering Ltd · MBEL⚠ unverified
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3.7
3.7
2.2
Pennar Industries Ltd · PENIND
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
1.0
1.4
1.5
1.9
2.0
2.2
2.9
2.6
2.9
2.7
3.5
3.2
2.5
1.7
09 · let price answer last
Market action
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Pre-Engineering Buildings at -16.3%. Everest Industries Ltd leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at -1.3%. 0 of 3 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-17.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Pre-Engineering Buildings comparison names 6 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 5 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 2 draw at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check. 1 of the 8 ranked sections has fewer than three usable current readings.
Keep these limits visible
- A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
- A high ROCE can be temporary or flattered by a small capital base. Read it beside margin, cash conversion and reinvestment.
- The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
- An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
- 2 companies draw at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; they are marked unverified wherever those figures appear.
- Thin comparisons: Capital expenditure have fewer than three usable current readings.
10 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 5 companies in the canonical Pre-Engineering Buildings membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
| Company | Market value | Price | Priced to | Latest fundamentals | Source standing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interarch Building Solutions Ltd INTERARCHLAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP | ₹3.0K Cr | ₹1,799 | 2026-07-19 | Mar 2026 | Cross-checked |
| EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd EPACKPEBAHEAD | ₹2.5K Cr | ₹252 | 2026-07-19 | Mar 2026 | Cross-checked |
| Pennar Industries Ltd PENIND | ₹2.2K Cr | ₹163 | 2026-07-19 | Mar 2026 | Cross-checked |
| M & B Engineering Ltd MBEL⚠ unverified | ₹1.7K Cr | ₹296 | 2026-07-19 | Mar 2026 | Includes unverified figures |
| Everest Industries Ltd EVERESTINDAHEAD⚠ unverified | ₹831 Cr | ₹524 | 2026-07-19 | Mar 2026 | Includes unverified figures |
How each company's sources stand: 2 of 5 companies draw at least one figure from a second data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source, because the two do not share enough reported history to compare. Those figures are marked unverified wherever they appear.
Evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Mar 2026 and market data through 2026-07-24. A second data feed fills gaps only after identity and scale reconciliation, and missing observations are never interpolated.
FundamentalsThrough Mar 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-24 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
Source standing3 cross-checked · 2 unverified · 0 withheld, of 5 graded companies.
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from. Every company's standing is listed in the register above.
Questions investors ask · short, speakable answers
Pre-Engineering Buildings company comparison FAQs
These 17 answers restate the Pre-Engineering Buildings comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 5 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Mar 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-24. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
What is the Nifty Pre-Engineering Buildings index?
The Nifty Pre-Engineering Buildings index tracks India's listed Pre-Engineering Buildings companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 5 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Pre-Engineering Buildings sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Mar 2026.
Which are the best Pre-Engineering Buildings stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Interarch Building Solutions Ltd places first among 5 listed Pre-Engineering Buildings companies, followed by EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Mar 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many Pre-Engineering Buildings stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 5 listed Pre-Engineering Buildings companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Mar 2026.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company is the biggest?
Pennar Industries Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month revenue of ₹3,621 crore, ahead of Interarch Building Solutions Ltd at ₹1,899 crore. That covers 5 of 5 companies with comparable reporting through Mar 2026.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company is growing fastest?
EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the fastest revenue growth at 34.5% year on year, across 5 of 5 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company has the best profit margins?
Pennar Industries Ltd has the highest operating margin at 11%, from 5 of 5 comparable companies. Pennar Industries Ltd shows the biggest recent improvement, at +1 percentage points. A high margin matters most when it is holding or rising, not when it is peaking.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company makes the most profit?
Pennar Industries Ltd earns the most, at ₹139 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 5 of 5 comparable companies. EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 55.9%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company earns the highest return on capital?
M & B Engineering Ltd leads on return on capital employed at 23%, across 5 of 5 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings stock is the cheapest?
On guarded PEG — where a LOWER number is cheaper — EPack Prefab Technologies Ltd screens cheapest at 0.43×. Only 3 of 5 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company has the strongest balance sheet?
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd carries the lowest comparable gross debt at ₹18 crore, from 5 of 5 companies. Absolute rupee debt alone does not settle it, because company scale differs — net debt and debt-to-equity in the chart above carry more information, and a very low-debt balance sheet can also mean under-investment.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings stock has the strongest price momentum?
Everest Industries Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Pre-Engineering Buildings company scores highest for research priority?
Interarch Building Solutions Ltd scores 71.7 out of 100 with 84% evidence confidence, from 26.3 points on growth and earnings, 18.4 on capital efficiency, 15 on valuation and 12 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Pre-Engineering Buildings companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 5 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 10 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Mar 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Pre-Engineering Buildings sector?
The 5 Pre-Engineering Buildings companies on this page carry ₹10,283 crore of combined market value. Interarch Building Solutions Ltd is the largest at ₹3,018 crore, about 29% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-29.
How is the Pre-Engineering Buildings sector performing?
0 of the 3 covered Pre-Engineering Buildings companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. A 52-week sector-versus-index comparison is not available from the current market series for this sector, so it is not quoted. Readings are as of 2026-07-29.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.