Finance & Investments - Microfinance Stocks in India
Finance & Investments - Microfinance: CreditAccess Grameen Ltd owns the largest revenue base; Satin Creditcare Network Ltd has the fastest current growth.
The Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies below are the listed Indian Finance & Investments - Microfinance universe this page tracks — the same constituent set people search for as the Nifty Finance & Investments - Microfinance index. Every figure is equal-weighted across those companies, so one large constituent cannot set the reading. Each number carries its own as-of date.
The sector itself · before any single company
How has Finance & Investments - Microfinance moved against NIFTY 500?
The line below covers 5.1 years. Over the most recent two of them this sector is 10% behind NIFTY 500. Earnings across its companies fell 52% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of NIFTY 500 on a rolling three-month view for 14 weeks running.
LEADER · ahead 14w✓Moving with the index7 of 7 companies ahead of NIFTY 500 by 5% or more over three months
Finance & Investments - Microfinance, equal-weighted, based at 200NIFTY 500, same base, same starttrailing 12-month earnings per share risingfalling
Strength anatomyBroad but lateHow much of the sector is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together7 of 7 stocks moving
Fresh0 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Backed by scoresmovers score +0 vs the sector average
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large2/20
Mid2/20
Small3/30
Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.
Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the sector line is an equal-weighted index of its 7 companies. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month earnings per share, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the sector taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while earnings grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.
Sector relative strength · before individual stocks
Is Finance & Investments - Microfinance outperforming NIFTY 500?
The 52-week comparison of Finance & Investments - Microfinance against NIFTY 500 is not available from the current market series. 7 of 7 covered companies currently beat NIFTY on Mansfield relative strength, so leadership inside the sector is selective. Satin Creditcare Network Ltd is the strongest against the sector itself at +19.6%. Readings are as of 2026-07-19.
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 13 weeks
—Sector vs NIFTY 500 · 52 weeks
7/7Stocks leading NIFTY 500
2/7Stocks leading sector
Sector metric: 28.2 as of 2026-07-19 · CONSOLIDATION · falling.
The central tension: the companies with the most scale are not necessarily the companies creating the most change.
Start with scale. Then earnings trajectory. Then business quality. Only after those three agree should price leadership carry much weight.
Bottom line
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 7 of 7 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500. CreditAccess Grameen Ltd leads with income of ₹6,378 crore, based on 7 of 7 comparable companies through Jun 2026. Satin Creditcare Network Ltd has the fastest current income growth at 21.9%, across 7 of 7 comparable companies.
Is the Finance & Investments - Microfinance sector outperforming NIFTY 500?
The 52-week sector comparison is unavailable. 7 of 7 covered companies currently have positive Mansfield relative strength versus NIFTY 500.
Which Finance & Investments - Microfinance company is largest by income?
CreditAccess Grameen Ltd leads with income of ₹6,378 crore, based on 7 of 7 comparable companies through Jun 2026.
Which Finance & Investments - Microfinance company is growing fastest?
Satin Creditcare Network Ltd has the fastest current income growth at 21.9%, across 7 of 7 comparable companies.
Which Finance & Investments - Microfinance company has the strongest 4-Factor Sector Score?
Satin Creditcare Network Ltd ranks first at 85/100 with 78.3% evidence confidence. The score prioritizes research; it is not a buy recommendation.
Which Finance & Investments - Microfinance company has the lowest comparable P/BV-to-ROE?
Satin Creditcare Network Ltd has the lowest comparable P/BV ÷ ROE at 0.09, among 6 of 7 companies that pass the metric’s comparability rules.
How much history does this Finance & Investments - Microfinance comparison include?
The page compares up to 20 reported quarters per company for fundamentals, CAPEX, debt and valuation, ending Jun 2026. Missing observations remain blank rather than being estimated.
How is the 4-Factor Sector Score calculated?
The four visible contributions add directly: growth and earnings up to 35 points, capital efficiency up to 25, valuation up to 20, and relative strength up to 20. Missing or stale evidence moves only the affected contribution toward neutral.
Companies
7
complete canonical membership
Combined market value
₹44.0K Cr
CreditAccess Grameen Ltd
Revenue growing
3/7
positive TTM year-on-year growth
Beating NIFTY 500
7/7
positive Mansfield relative strength
Global company selection
00 · research priority, made explicit
4-Factor Sector Score
An additive sector-relative research score. The four displayed point contributions always equal the total: Growth & earnings (35), Capital efficiency (25), Valuation (20), and Relative strength (20). Missing or stale evidence is absorbed inside the affected factor, never applied as a hidden adjustment.
Satin Creditcare Network Ltd has the strongest current balance of earnings trajectory, business quality, valuation and price confirmation, with 78.3% evidence confidence.
Missing observations are not scored as bad. Their missing weight lowers confidence and pulls the final score toward neutral. Financial companies use P/BV÷ROE and asset quality; PEG, industrial OPM and ROCE are excluded.
Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -10.2% and the one-year return is 17.2%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Decision use: Acceleration candidate, not a confirmed leader: earnings are strong but sector-relative strength is -13.2% and the one-year return is 16.4%. Do not upgrade until sector-relative strength is above zero and another reported period confirms growth.
Decision use: Balanced evidence: keep at normal research priority and require another comparable period before raising conviction.
17.4/35Growth & earnings
Income -27.8% · PAT 100%
40% evidence
6.6/25Capital efficiency
ROA 0.2% · ROE 0.7% · GNPA 3.2%
95% evidence
3.2/20Valuation
P/BV 1.42× · P/BV÷ROE 2.09
100% evidence
12.1/20Relative strength
RS sector -1% · RS bench 25.7% · 1Y 18.2%
100% evidence
01 · compare level, then change
Income Scale & Growth Durability
CreditAccess Grameen Ltd has the highest Income among the 7 Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies compared here, at ₹6,378 crore. Satin Creditcare Network Ltd is next at ₹3,157 crore. Satin Creditcare Network Ltd has the highest Income growth at 21.9%, so level and change sit with different companies. Its Income series carries 20 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: CreditAccess Grameen Ltd is the scale leader at ₹6,378 crore, 102% ahead of Satin Creditcare Network Ltd. Satin Creditcare Network Ltd's growth is 21.9% from a ₹3,157 crore base, with 19 reported observations in the 20-quarter window. Treat the growth leader as an acceleration candidate, not as equally proven scale.
LeaderCreditAccess Grameen Ltd · ₹6,378 crore
Gap102% versus #2 · Satin Creditcare Network Ltd
Persistence6/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/7 companies · 113 observations
Investor read: CreditAccess Grameen Ltd is the scale benchmark; Satin Creditcare Network Ltd is the acceleration watch. Promote the challenger only if growth persists and converts into margin and returns.
This conclusion weakens if: CreditAccess Grameen Ltd's growth falls below Satin Creditcare Network Ltd's for two consecutive comparable reports while operating margin also compresses.
For lenders, reported income is used instead of industrial-company sales. Growth is compared year-on-year.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
CreditAccess Grameen Ltd has the highest Net profit among the 7 Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies compared here, at ₹1,211 crore. Northern Arc Capital Ltd is next at ₹404 crore. The same company also holds the highest Profit growth, at the 100% top of the scoring scale. Its Net profit series carries 20 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: CreditAccess Grameen Ltd leads with ₹1,211 crore of TTM profit, 199.8% above Northern Arc Capital Ltd. CreditAccess Grameen Ltd shows ≥100% on the scoring scale (527.5% uncapped) growth from a ₹1,211 crore profit base. Compare the size of the base and persistence before ranking acceleration above profit scale.
LeaderCreditAccess Grameen Ltd · ₹1,211 crore
Gap199.8% versus #2 · Northern Arc Capital Ltd
Persistence3/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/7 companies · 113 observations
Investor read: CreditAccess Grameen Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current profit growth signal.
Net profit is ranked only where the comparison base is economically meaningful. Loss-to-profit flips are shown but do not win the growth table.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
No company in this Finance & Investments - Microfinance comparison has a funding base figure that passes this section's guard, so the Deposits rank is empty. On Borrowings, CreditAccess Grameen Ltd is highest at ₹23,641 crore, across 7 of 7 companies with a usable reading.
What the numbers say: There is not enough comparable evidence to name a reliable deposits leader.
LeaderNo comparable leader
GapNot enough peers
PersistenceNot enough history
Coverage0/7 companies · 0 observations
Investor read: The current leader sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current borrowings signal.
For banks, debt is operating funding rather than industrial leverage. Deposits and borrowings are therefore shown as funding-base levels; asset quality, funding cost and liquidity determine whether that funding is attractive.
Depositslargest deposit bases
—Not enough comparable data—
Borrowingslargest borrowings
1CreditAccess Grameen Ltd CREDITACC₹23.6K Cr
2Northern Arc Capital Ltd NORTHARC₹12.3K Cr
3Satin Creditcare Network Ltd SATIN₹11.0K Cr
4Muthoot Microfin Ltd MUTHOOTMF₹9.7K Cr
5Fusion Finance Ltd FUSION₹5.6K Cr
Funding base · company comparison
0/7 level · 7/7 change
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
CreditAccess Grameen Ltd has the highest ROA among the 7 Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies compared here, at 2.4%. Satin Creditcare Network Ltd is next at 2.3%. Muthoot Microfin Ltd has the highest ROA change at +3.3 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its ROA series carries 11 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: CreditAccess Grameen Ltd leads roa at 2.4%; Muthoot Microfin Ltd leads roa change at +3.3 percentage points.
LeaderCreditAccess Grameen Ltd · 2.4%
Gap4.3% versus #2 · Satin Creditcare Network Ltd
Persistence4/7 recent comparable periods
Coverage5/7 companies · 35 observations
Investor read: CreditAccess Grameen Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roa change signal.
ROA is the cleanest first comparison for lenders because the balance sheet is the operating asset.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Withheld from this chart: Northern Arc Capital Ltd (NORTHARC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 20% on reported income across 12 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Fusion Finance Ltd (FUSION) — its two data sources disagree by up to 4.9% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Spandana Sphoorty Financial Ltd (SPANDANA) — its two data sources disagree by up to 6.9% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Satin Creditcare Network Ltd has the highest ROE among the 7 Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies compared here, at 12.3%. Northern Arc Capital Ltd is next at 11.1%. Fusion Finance Ltd has the highest ROE change at +56 percentage points, so level and change sit with different companies. Its ROE series carries 19 reported observations across the 20-quarter window.
What the numbers say: Satin Creditcare Network Ltd leads roe at 12.3%; Fusion Finance Ltd leads roe change at +56 percentage points.
LeaderSatin Creditcare Network Ltd · 12.3%
Gap10.8% versus #2 · Northern Arc Capital Ltd
Persistence2/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage7/7 companies · 75 observations
Investor read: Satin Creditcare Network Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current roe change signal.
ROE shows the return to shareholders, but should be read with asset quality and leverage.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Withheld from this chart: Northern Arc Capital Ltd (NORTHARC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 20% on reported income across 12 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Fusion Finance Ltd (FUSION) — its two data sources disagree by up to 4.9% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Spandana Sphoorty Financial Ltd (SPANDANA) — its two data sources disagree by up to 6.9% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Fusion Finance Ltd has the lowest Gross NPA among the 7 Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies compared here, at 3.2%. Arman Financial Services Ltd is next at 3.4%. The same company also holds the lowest GNPA change, at -4.7 percentage points. 3 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Fusion Finance Ltd leads both gross npa at 3.2% and gnpa change at -4.7 percentage points.
LeaderFusion Finance Ltd · 3.2%
Gap6.4% versus #2 · Arman Financial Services Ltd
Persistence4/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage3/7 companies · 62 observations
Investor read: Fusion Finance Ltd sets the level benchmark; use the change leader as an inflection watch only after another comparable report confirms it.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current gnpa change signal.
Lower gross NPA is better. Improvement means the ratio is falling, so ranks are intentionally inverted.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
Withheld from this chart: Northern Arc Capital Ltd (NORTHARC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 20% on reported income across 12 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld. A figure two sources cannot agree on is not drawn — the gap is a decision, not missing data.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Satin Creditcare Network Ltd has the lowest P/BV ÷ ROE among the 7 Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies compared here, at 0.09×. Northern Arc Capital Ltd is next at 0.11×. The same company also holds the lowest P/BV, at 1.04×. 6 of 7 companies report a comparable reading, the latest through Mar 2026.
What the numbers say: Satin Creditcare Network Ltd has the lowest comparable P/BV ÷ ROE at 0.09×, 18.2% below Northern Arc Capital Ltd. Only 6 of 7 companies pass the guard, so no broad “cheapest stock” conclusion is defensible unless the current multiple, own-history position and growth durability agree.
LeaderSatin Creditcare Network Ltd · 0.09×
Gap18.2% versus #2 · Northern Arc Capital Ltd
Persistence0/8 recent comparable periods
Coverage6/7 companies · 62 observations
Investor read: Treat valuation as permission to investigate, never as a standalone reason to buy.
This conclusion weakens if: The next two comparable reports reverse the current p/bv signal.
Banks are compared on P/BV and P/BV÷ROE, not PEG. Lower is better only if asset quality and return durability hold; cheap book value with weakening NPAs is not automatically attractive.
Solid lines show level; dotted lines show change when “Both” is selected. Missing reports break the line rather than being invented.
All-company data · latest reported quarter
Each figure is the company’s latest single reported quarter. The rankings above use trailing-twelve-month or current-market values, so a company can legitimately show a different number in each.
Satin Creditcare Network Ltd has the strongest one-year price move in Finance & Investments - Microfinance at +55.5%. It also leads on Mansfield relative strength against NIFTY at +50.4%. 7 of 7 covered companies are above zero on that measure. Every line covers 313 weekly closes through 2026-07-17.
Every price line is indexed to 100 over the chosen window. Mansfield relative strength compares a price ratio with its own 52-week average; zero separates leadership from lagging.
Price and relative strength
Price is rebased to 100 inside the selected window. Pair ratio rebases each selected company against one chosen denominator.
Before the conclusion · check the blind spots
What can make this comparison misleading?
This Finance & Investments - Microfinance comparison names 8 specific ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. All 7 companies here report on comparable dates, so no rank carries a stale marker. 1 draws at least one figure from a second feed with too little overlap to cross-check. 3 have second-feed figures withheld because the two sources disagree.
Keep these limits visible
A high growth rate can be a low-base artefact. The page keeps level and change separate for that reason.
A high ROE can be manufactured with leverage. Read it beside ROA and asset quality.
The 4-Factor Sector Score ranks research priority, not portfolio action. Management quality, catalysts and risks need equally fresh evidence before capital is deployed.
An “all companies” line chart preserves completeness, but rank changes should be checked against reporting dates before drawing a conclusion.
Banks and lenders are not forced through operating-margin or ROCE comparisons; missing lender-specific fields remain visibly missing.
1 company draws at least one figure from a second data feed with too little overlapping history to cross-check against the primary source; it is marked unverified wherever that figure appears.
3 companies are missing from the second-feed metrics by decision, not by absence: the two sources disagree, so nothing from the second is drawn. Read those rows as narrower evidence, never as a weaker business.
Thin comparisons: Funding base have fewer than three usable current readings.
09 · the complete set
Which companies are included?
All 7 companies in the canonical Finance & Investments - Microfinance membership are listed below, largest market value first — nothing is silently dropped, even where a company reports too little to rank. The charts above default to a selective view; this register is the complete set, with each company's own latest reporting date beside it.
AHEAD means the company is beating the index by 5% or more over three months. LAGGING, FUNDAMENTALS UP means it is 20% or more behind over a year while its trailing twelve-month earnings grew 20% or more. Both rules are fixed and applied the same way in every sector.
How each company's sources stand: 1 of 7 companies draws at least one figure from a second data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source, because the two do not share enough reported history to compare. Those figures are marked unverified wherever they appear. 3 of 7 companies have a second data feed that is known to disagree with the primary source, so nothing from it is drawn: Northern Arc Capital Ltd (NORTHARC) — its two data sources disagree by up to 20% on reported income across 12 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Fusion Finance Ltd (FUSION) — its two data sources disagree by up to 4.9% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld; Spandana Sphoorty Financial Ltd (SPANDANA) — its two data sources disagree by up to 6.9% on reported income across 14 comparable periods, so its derived ratios are withheld.
Evidence and freshness
How was this comparison built?
This comparison is built from the reported filings of 7 Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies, normalized to a common ₹ scale and a shared quarter axis of up to 20 quarters each. Fundamentals run through Jun 2026 and market data through 2026-07-24.
FundamentalsThrough Jun 2026 · up to 20 quarters per company
Market dataThrough 2026-07-24 · weekly price and relative-strength history
Derived metricsGrowth, changes, CAPEX intensity, net debt, guarded PEG and P/BV÷ROE are calculated only when their inputs are comparable.
Score confidenceMissing and stale evidence reduces confidence and pulls the 0–100 research-priority score toward neutral.
A second feed is read only after its reported income is matched against the primary source on at least three overlapping periods. Where the two agree the figures fill silently. Where there is too little shared history to compare, the figures are still drawn — they are the only evidence there is — and marked ⚠ unverified everywhere they appear. Where the two are known to disagree, nothing from the second feed is drawn and the affected company is named under the chart it is missing from. Every company's standing is listed in the register above.
Finance & Investments - Microfinance company comparison FAQs
These 17 answers restate the Finance & Investments - Microfinance comparison above in question form. Every one is computed from the same 7 companies and the same reported filings as the rankings and charts, current through Jun 2026. Price and relative-strength answers run through 2026-07-24. Nothing here is estimated, and none of it is a recommendation.
What is the Nifty Finance & Investments - Microfinance index?
The Nifty Finance & Investments - Microfinance index tracks India's listed Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies as a single basket. This page follows the same 7 companies and equal-weights them, so every company's weekly return counts once whatever it is worth, and the reading belongs to the Finance & Investments - Microfinance sector rather than to its largest constituent. Figures are as of Jun 2026.
Which are the best Finance & Investments - Microfinance stocks in India?
Ranked by this page's four-factor score, Satin Creditcare Network Ltd places first among 7 listed Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies, followed by Northern Arc Capital Ltd. That is a ranking of published data — earnings, quality, valuation and market behaviour as of Jun 2026 — and not a recommendation; Sector Alpha is not registered with SEBI as an investment adviser.
How many Finance & Investments - Microfinance stocks are listed in India?
This comparison covers 7 listed Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies in India, each above the size floor the site applies, with 20 quarters of reported figures per company where the filings exist. The full ranked list is on this page, as of Jun 2026.
Which Finance & Investments - Microfinance company is the biggest?
CreditAccess Grameen Ltd is the largest, with trailing-twelve-month income of ₹6,378 crore, ahead of Satin Creditcare Network Ltd at ₹3,157 crore. That covers 7 of 7 companies with comparable reporting through Jun 2026.
Which Finance & Investments - Microfinance company is growing fastest?
Satin Creditcare Network Ltd has the fastest income growth at 21.9% year on year, across 7 of 7 comparable companies. Fast growth off a small base is not the same as proven scale — check whether the rate holds across several quarters on the chart above before treating it as a trend.
Which Finance & Investments - Microfinance company makes the most profit?
CreditAccess Grameen Ltd earns the most, at ₹1,211 crore of trailing-twelve-month net profit, from 7 of 7 comparable companies. CreditAccess Grameen Ltd has the fastest profit growth at 100%, though growth off a small or recovering profit base overstates how much has actually changed.
Which Finance & Investments - Microfinance lender has the best asset quality?
Fusion Finance Ltd reports the lowest gross NPA ratio at 3.2% — lower is better — across 3 of 7 lenders. Read the direction as well as the level: a rising NPA ratio off a low base can matter more than a high but falling one.
Which Finance & Investments - Microfinance company earns the highest return on capital?
CreditAccess Grameen Ltd leads on return on assets at 2.4%, across 5 of 7 companies. Read it beside the length of its reported history: a high return that repeats for years is evidence of a durable business, while a single high reading can be a small capital base or one good year.
Which Finance & Investments - Microfinance stock is the cheapest?
On price-to-book divided by return on equity — where a LOWER number is cheaper — Satin Creditcare Network Ltd screens cheapest at 0.09×. Only 6 of 7 companies pass the comparability guard, so this is not a sector-wide "cheapest stock" verdict. Cheap on a multiple is a reason to investigate, never a reason to buy on its own.
Which Finance & Investments - Microfinance stock has the strongest price momentum?
Satin Creditcare Network Ltd has the strongest relative strength against NIFTY 500. Relative strength answers last, after growth, quality and valuation: price can move well before the fundamentals confirm it, and sometimes without them confirming at all.
Which Finance & Investments - Microfinance company scores highest for research priority?
Satin Creditcare Network Ltd scores 85 out of 100 with 78.3% evidence confidence, from 29.9 points on growth and earnings, 18.3 on capital efficiency, 16.8 on valuation and 20 on relative strength. This ranks what deserves work next. It is not a buy recommendation, and management quality, catalysts and risk still need separate research.
How many Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies does this comparison cover, and over what period?
It compares 7 listed companies over up to 20 reported quarters of fundamentals and 10 fiscal years of capital allocation, ending Jun 2026, plus weekly price and relative-strength history. Membership is the full sector list — nothing is dropped for having thin data.
What is the total market cap of the Finance & Investments - Microfinance sector?
The 7 Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies on this page carry ₹44,031 crore of combined market value. CreditAccess Grameen Ltd is the largest at ₹24,329 crore, about 55% of the sector's total on its own. Market value moves with price, so this reading is dated 2026-07-29.
What is the Finance & Investments - Microfinance sector's P/B ratio?
The median price-to-book ratio across the 7 Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies on this page is 1.4×, measured on the 7 that report a comparable figure. A sector-level history for this multiple is not held here, so this is a cross-section of today, not a comparison with the sector’s own past. Figures are as of 2026-07-29.
How is the Finance & Investments - Microfinance sector performing?
7 of the 7 covered Finance & Investments - Microfinance companies are beating NIFTY 500 on Mansfield relative strength. A 52-week sector-versus-index comparison is not available from the current market series for this sector, so it is not quoted. Readings are as of 2026-07-29.
Why are some values on this page blank?
A blank means that company did not report a comparable figure for that period, so nothing is shown. Missing observations are never interpolated, carried forward, or replaced with a similar-looking accounting line, and a company with missing evidence has its research score pulled toward neutral rather than being scored as bad.
Is this investment advice?
No. Every figure here is a deterministic calculation from reported company filings and market data, published for research. It contains no recommendation to buy or sell any security, does not account for your circumstances, and is not a substitute for advice from a licensed adviser.