Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-24
Five-year price · 20 complete calendar quarters · BTC-relative

NFT Crypto Coins

Is NFT outperforming Bitcoin, and is leadership broad?

Bottom line

SPACE ID ranks first for research priority in NFT crypto at 62/100, and its native activity proof is incomplete. The theme's 13-week excess versus Bitcoin is -9.7% on 14% breadth, which is what decides whether that lead is isolated or broad. 0 of the 9 assets here carry enough native evidence to move past a tape-led label.

These NFT coins are part of the cryptocurrency universe this site tracks daily — 894 of the top 1,000 crypto currency assets by market cap, priced from exchange closes and matched to protocol fees and revenue where a protocol publishes them.

The theme itself · before any single company

How has NFT moved against Bitcoin?

The line below covers 5 years. Over the most recent two of them this theme is 30% behind Bitcoin. Protocol revenue across its protocols fell 6% on average over the last four reported quarters.

ASLEEP · 1y +0.5%·Price down, no fundamental support2 of 6 coins ahead of Bitcoin by 5% or more over three months

RS — · 1/6 >200d (+0) · 2/6 lead (+0) · EPS —

100200500Mon Mon Mon Mon Mon 84271
100200500Mon Mon Mon Mon Mon 84271
NFT, equal-weighted, based at 200 Bitcoin, same base, same start trailing 12-month protocol revenue rising falling
Strength anatomy MixedHow much of the theme is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.
Together2 of 6 coins moving
Fresh0 crossed in the last 4 weeks
Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago
Large 1/20
Mid 1/20
Small 0/20

Participation is not spreading downward this month; the larger companies are still carrying most of it.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the theme line is an equal-weighted index of its 6 coins. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month protocol revenue, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the theme taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while protocol revenue grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

RISK OFF market context

NFT vs Bitcoin — Relative Strength & Breadth

NFT crypto has underperformed Bitcoin by 17.7% over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of current members. Over 13 weeks the figure is -9.7%. 1 of 7 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. SPACE ID leads Bitcoin-relative strength at +275.2%. Price readings are as of 2026-07-24.

-9.7%13w vs BTC
-18%52w vs BTC
1/7Above 200-DMA
IDRS leader · +275%
Assets
9
canonical functional membership
Activity-covered
0/9
enough native evidence
Top score
62.0/100
SPACE ID
Calendar quarters
20
complete; missing stays missing
Global asset selection · top 20 shown
00 · exact additive research priority

4-Factor Crypto Evidence Score

A within-theme research-priority score for the 9 assets in NFT, out of 100. The four displayed point contributions add exactly to the total, and the market regime changes the action label, never the arithmetic. SPACE ID is highest at 62/100 on 50% evidence. It ranks research attention, not portfolio action.

Market leadership · 35Network & economic traction · 30Value capture · 20Liquidity & downside risk · 15
SPACE ID leads the current research queue at 62/100 with 50% evidence.
0/9 assets have enough native activity evidence to move beyond a tape-led label.

Missing native metrics are not scored as zero and are not silently reweighted. They pull only the affected factor toward neutral and lower its visible evidence percentage.

1. SPACE ID · ID

62.0/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 35.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 2.0 = 62.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

35.0/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 275.2 pp · RS-sector 384.4 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

2.0/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $0 · vol 295.6%

100% evidence

2. Magic Eden · ME

50.0/100 · Illiquid · research only · 12% evidence

Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.5 = 50.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC — · RS-sector — · 200-DMA —

0% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

7.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $416,380 · vol —

80% evidence

3. AINFT · NFT

50.0/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 0% evidence

Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 7.5 = 50.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC — · RS-sector — · 200-DMA —

0% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

7.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume — · vol —

0% evidence

4. Ethereum Name Service · ENS

49.1/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 69% evidence

Exact sum: 12.7 + 15.1 + 10.0 + 11.3 = 49.1

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

12.7/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -12.3 pp · RS-sector 0 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.1/30Network & economic traction

Fees 9% · revenue 9% · users —

53% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield 3.21% · revenue yield 3.21%

15% evidence

11.3/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $11,916,625 · vol 47.6%

100% evidence

5. SWFTCOIN · SWFTC

47.1/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 13.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.8 = 47.1

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

13.3/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -4.7 pp · RS-sector -15.8 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

8.8/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $531,753 · vol 45.1%

100% evidence

6. Audius · AUDIO

43.2/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 7.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.3 = 43.2

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

7.9/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -19.2 pp · RS-sector -4.8 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

10.3/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $2,971,683 · vol 28.1%

100% evidence

7. BLOCKv · VEE

38.6/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 11.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 2.1 = 38.6

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

11.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -33.9 pp · RS-sector 17.4 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

2.1/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $0 · vol 120.5%

100% evidence

8. GAL (migrated to Gravity - G) · GAL

37.1/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 6.6 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.5 = 37.1

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

6.6/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -42.4 pp · RS-sector 9.3 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

5.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $163,012 · vol 20.4%

100% evidence

9. Chiliz · CHZ

33.2/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 55% evidence

Exact sum: 0.7 + 12.6 + 10.0 + 9.9 = 33.2

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

0.7/35Market leadership

RS-BTC -54.3 pp · RS-sector -26 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

12.6/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

17% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

9.9/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $29,632,951 · vol 58.9%

100% evidence

01 · complete calendar-quarter evidence

Which projects are generating the most network fees?

Ethereum Name Service leads NFT crypto on Trailing 12-month fees at $5.7M. 1 of 1 asset with comparable change data is growing. Coverage is 1 of the 9 assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero.

LeaderEthereum Name Service · $5.7M
GapNot comparable
Persistence1 assets have positive comparable growth
Coverage1/9 assets

Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.

This conclusion weakens if: fee growth turns negative across two complete calendar quarters or fee coverage falls below the stated threshold.

Trailing 12-month fees is the sum of the latest four complete calendar quarters. Growth compares that sum with the prior four-quarter sum.
Trailing 12-month feestop five
1Ethereum Name Service ENS$5.7M
Fee growthtop five
1Ethereum Name Service ENS+9.0%
Network fees · asset comparison
1/9 level · 1/9 change
Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first
AssetTrailing 12-month feesFee growth
space-id
magic-eden
apenft
ethereum-name-service$909.4K+9.0%
swftcoin
audius
blockv
project-galaxy
chiliz
02 · complete calendar-quarter evidence

Which projects convert activity into protocol revenue?

Ethereum Name Service leads NFT crypto on Trailing 12-month revenue at $5.7M. 1 of 1 asset with comparable change data is growing. Coverage is 1 of the 9 assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero.

LeaderEthereum Name Service · $5.7M
GapNot comparable
Persistence1 assets have positive comparable growth
Coverage1/9 assets

Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.

This conclusion weakens if: revenue growth turns negative or the revenue-to-fees take rate falls for two complete calendar quarters.

Trailing 12-month revenue is the sum of the latest four complete calendar quarters. Growth compares that sum with the prior four-quarter sum.
Trailing 12-month revenuetop five
1Ethereum Name Service ENS$5.7M
Revenue growthtop five
1Ethereum Name Service ENS+9.0%
Protocol revenue · asset comparison
1/9 level · 1/9 change
Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first
AssetTrailing 12-month revenueRevenue growth
space-id
magic-eden
apenft
ethereum-name-service$909.4K+9.0%
swftcoin
audius
blockv
project-galaxy
chiliz
03 · complete calendar-quarter evidence

Where is capital actually committed on-chain?

Chiliz leads NFT crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $3.2M, 2776% ahead of Magic Eden. 0 of 1 asset with comparable change data are growing. Coverage is 2 of the 9 assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero.

LeaderChiliz · $3.2M
Gap2776% versus #2
Persistence0 assets have positive comparable growth
Coverage2/9 assets

Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.

This conclusion weakens if: TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.

Quarter-end TVL uses protocol TVL first for protocol assets and exact-ID chain TVL for chain assets or where protocol TVL is unavailable. A blank is unavailable, not zero. Growth compares with the same complete quarter one year earlier.
Quarter-end TVLtop five
1Chiliz CHZ$3.2M
2Magic Eden ME$111.2K
TVL growthtop five
1Chiliz CHZ-48%
Total value locked · asset comparison
2/9 level · 1/9 change
Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first
AssetQuarter-end TVLTVL growth
space-id
magic-eden$111.2K
apenft
ethereum-name-service
swftcoin
audius
blockv
project-galaxy
chiliz$3.2M-48%
04 · let price answer last

Which assets lead on price and relative strength?

SPACE ID leads the NFT tape on Bitcoin-relative strength at +275% over 90 days. 1 of 7 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Price shows what happened; BTC-relative strength shows whether the asset beat crypto’s opportunity-cost benchmark. Both lines run through 2026-07-24.

Complete set · no silent drops

Which assets are in NFT?

9 priced assets are assigned to NFT, listed below by rank with every one visible — including tape-only names that publish no protocol activity. Each asset has exactly one canonical functional theme, chosen by a specific-to-general first match on its categories. Pegged, wrapped, liquid-staking receipt and tokenized-asset instruments are excluded because they have no independent price discovery.

RankAssetPrice90dRS-BTC200-DMA30d volMedian volumePrice qualityActivity sourceScoreEvidence
1SPACE ID ID$0.0131+258%+275%Above296%$0usabletape only62.050%
2Magic Eden ME$0.0638$416.4Kusableprotocol50.012%
3AINFT NFTusabletape only50.00%
4Ethereum Name Service ENS$4.34-30%-12%Below48%$11.9Musableprotocol49.169%
5SWFTCOIN SWFTC$0.0025-22%-4.7%Below45%$531.8Kusabletape only47.150%
6Audius AUDIO$0.0131-37%-19%Below28%$3.0Musabletape only43.250%
7BLOCKv VEE$0.0066-51%-34%Below121%$0usabletape only38.650%
8GAL (migrated to Gravity - G) GAL$0.9290-60%-42%Below20%$163.0Kusabletape only37.150%
9Chiliz CHZ$0.0141-72%-54%Below59%$29.6Musablechain TVL33.255%
Methodology · boundaries make the answer useful

What can make this comparison misleading?

This NFT comparison names 5 ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. The largest is that crypto network activity is not company earnings: protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders. Coverage is also uneven — 0 of 9 assets carry enough native evidence to rank on more than price.

  • Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
  • Market-cap values are a dated universe snapshot, not point-in-time historical supply data.
  • Current category labels are applied to historical prices; this creates survivorship and taxonomy hindsight.
  • Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules, historical circulating supply and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
  • Equal weighting is used for sector history because true historical market-cap weights are unavailable.
Price and technicalsThrough 2026-07-24. Five-year weekly observations benchmarked to Bitcoin.
Protocol activityThrough 2026-07-24. Fees, revenue, protocol TVL and DEX volume.
Chain activityUsers and transactions through unavailable; separately sourced chain TVL through 2026-07-24.
Market capSnapshot dated 2026-07-04; no historical supply series is implied.
Questions the page should answer directly

Crypto analysis FAQs

These 18 answers cover the questions this page can settle from data it holds — what the category is, how the score is built, what the coverage gaps are, and what would change the read. Every answer below is also present in the page’s FAQ schema and in its plain-text rendition. None of them is a recommendation.

What is NFT crypto?

NFT crypto refers to cryptocurrency projects grouped by what they actually do rather than by market fashion. This page tracks 9 such coins by market cap, price and Bitcoin-relative strength, with protocol fees and revenue where a project publishes them. Readings are as of 2026-07-24.

What is the total market cap of NFT crypto coins?

The NFT coins on this page are tracked against a universe of 894 of the top 1,000 crypto currency assets by market cap. Market-cap metadata is dated 2026-07-04, separately from the price series, and each coin's own figure is in the table on this page.

Are NFT crypto coins outperforming Bitcoin?

NFT has returned -17.7% versus Bitcoin over 52 weeks and -9.7% over 13 weeks on an equal-weight current-member index. 1/7 covered assets are above their 200-day averages as of 2026-07-24.

Which NFT asset has the strongest research score?

SPACE ID ranks first at 62/100: 35.0 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 2.0 = 62.0. It is labelled “Illiquid · research only” with 50% overall evidence and 0% native-economics evidence.

How is the NFT 4-factor score calculated?

The exact sum is Market leadership /35 + Network and economic traction /30 + Value capture /20 + Liquidity and downside risk /15. Missing data pulls only the affected factor toward neutral and lowers evidence; it is never silently reweighted.

Why can a NFT asset be labelled tape-led?

Tape-led means price and relative-strength evidence exists but less than half of the native traction and value-capture evidence is available. Such assets remain visible but rank below fully evidenced assets.

Does protocol revenue accrue to the token?

Not necessarily. Protocol fees and revenue measure network economics; token-holder value depends on the protocol’s burn, buyback, staking, distribution and governance rules. This page never assumes accrual merely because revenue exists.

Does crypto have a P/E or PEG ratio?

No comparable company-style P/E or PEG is used. Where coverage permits, the page shows network fee yield and protocol-revenue yield against a dated market-cap snapshot, with an explicit token-accrual caveat.

How much history is shown for NFT?

The page shows five years of weekly price and relative-strength history and 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity where available. Missing periods remain gaps.

Why do the crypto data dates differ?

Prices and technical metrics run through 2026-07-24; protocol activity through 2026-07-24; chain users and transactions through the latest available chain date; chain TVL through 2026-07-24; market capitalisation is a separate snapshot dated 2026-07-04.

Are stablecoins and wrapped tokens included in NFT?

No. Pegged, wrapped, liquid-staking receipt and tokenized-asset instruments are excluded because they do not have independent price discovery.

Can one token appear in multiple raw crypto categories?

Yes, but public MLA pages assign each asset to exactly one functional theme using a specific-to-general first-match taxonomy. NFT therefore has one canonical membership list.

What would invalidate the current NFT theme read?

The read weakens if the sector’s 13-week relative return versus Bitcoin falls below zero, fewer than one-third of covered assets remain above the 200-day average, and the leading asset’s native activity also contracts.

Does this page include funding rates, open interest or token unlocks?

No. Those datasets are not held in the current research store, so the page names them as unavailable rather than inferring them from price.

Which projects are generating the most network fees?

Ethereum Name Service leads NFT crypto on Trailing 12-month fees at $5.7M. 1 of 1 asset with comparable change data is growing. Coverage is 1 of the 9 assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if fee growth turns negative across two complete calendar quarters or fee coverage falls below the stated threshold.

Which projects convert activity into protocol revenue?

Ethereum Name Service leads NFT crypto on Trailing 12-month revenue at $5.7M. 1 of 1 asset with comparable change data is growing. Coverage is 1 of the 9 assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if revenue growth turns negative or the revenue-to-fees take rate falls for two complete calendar quarters.

Where is capital actually committed on-chain?

Chiliz leads NFT crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $3.2M, 2776% ahead of Magic Eden. 0 of 1 asset with comparable change data are growing. Coverage is 2 of the 9 assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.

Which NFT project has the largest fee base?

Ethereum Name Service leads covered trailing-12-month fees at $5.7M. Coverage is 1/9; this is network activity, not automatically token-holder income.

Chat with this page