Five-year price · 20 complete calendar quarters · BTC-relative

AI Crypto Coins

Is AI outperforming Bitcoin, and is leadership broad?

Bottom line

NEAR Protocol ranks first for research priority in AI crypto at 62.3/100, and its native activity evidence clears the coverage gate. The theme's 13-week excess versus Bitcoin is +15.2% on 20% breadth, which is what decides whether that lead is isolated or broad. 3 of the 110 assets here carry enough native evidence to move past a tape-led label.

These AI coins are part of the cryptocurrency universe this site tracks daily — 894 of the top 1,000 crypto currency assets by market cap, priced from exchange closes and matched to protocol fees and revenue where a protocol publishes them.

The theme itself · before any single company

How has AI moved against Bitcoin?

The line below covers 5 years. Over the most recent two of them this theme is 37% behind Bitcoin. Protocol revenue across its protocols fell 60% on average over the last four reported quarters. It has been ahead of Bitcoin on a rolling three-month view for 11 weeks running.

BREAKING OUT · ahead 11w·Price down, no fundamental support39 of 73 coins ahead of Bitcoin by 5% or more over three months

RS ↑11w · 13/73 >200d (−3) · 39/73 lead (+4) · EPS —

AI, equal-weighted, based at 200 Bitcoin, same base, same start trailing 12-month protocol revenue rising falling

Strength anatomy Broadening down the ladderHow much of the theme is participating, how recently, and whether the movers score well.

Together39 of 73 coins moving

Fresh7 crossed in the last 4 weeks

Down the cap ladder — bar is now, tick is four weeks ago

Large 8/15+1

Mid 11/26−1

Small 20/32+4

Participation is spreading downward — the mid and small companies added more this month than the large ones did.

Both lines start at 200 in the same week, so the distance between them is the whole story: the theme line is an equal-weighted index of its 73 coins. The bars underneath are trailing 12-month protocol revenue, one bar per reported quarter, each member rebased to 100 at the start and the theme taking the median — so a price line pulling away from flat bars is a re-rating, not earnings. A bar turns red when that figure is lower than the quarter before. Rules are fixed and applied identically everywhere on this site: ahead by 5% or more over three months, or behind by 20% or more over a year while protocol revenue grew 20% or more. Hover any point to read both values and the gap. This is a description of what the numbers did, not advice.

RISK OFF market context

AI vs Bitcoin — Relative Strength & Breadth

AI crypto has outperformed Bitcoin by 26.3% over 52 weeks on an equal-weight index of current members. Over 13 weeks the figure is +15.2%. 14 of 70 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Velvet leads Bitcoin-relative strength at +366.3%. Price readings are as of 2026-07-24.

+15%13w vs BTC

+26%52w vs BTC

14/70Above 200-DMA

VELVETRS leader · +366%

Assets

110

canonical functional membership

Activity-covered

3/110

enough native evidence

Top score

62.3/100

NEAR Protocol

Calendar quarters

complete; missing stays missing

Global asset selection · top 20 shown

Showing 20 of 110 assets

00 · exact additive research priority

4-Factor Crypto Evidence Score

A within-theme research-priority score for the 110 assets in AI, out of 100. The four displayed point contributions add exactly to the total, and the market regime changes the action label, never the arithmetic. NEAR Protocol is highest at 62.3/100 on 87% evidence. It ranks research attention, not portfolio action.

Market leadership · 35Network & economic traction · 30Value capture · 20Liquidity & downside risk · 15

NEAR Protocol leads the current research queue at 62.3/100 with 87% evidence.

3/110 assets have enough native activity evidence to move beyond a tape-led label.

Missing native metrics are not scored as zero and are not silently reweighted. They pull only the affected factor toward neutral and lower its visible evidence percentage.

1. NEAR Protocol · NEAR

62.3/100 · Constructive watch · market gate closed · 87% evidence

Exact sum: 30.0 + 13.4 + 6.5 + 12.4 = 62.3

Decision use: Price leads usage. Wait for fees, users or TVL to confirm the move.

30.0/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 46.2 pp · RS-sector 0.1 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

13.4/30Network & economic traction

Fees -69% · revenue -69.1% · users —

70% evidence

6.5/20Value capture

Fee yield 0.07% · revenue yield 0.07%

80% evidence

12.4/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $210,216,109 · vol 63.9%

100% evidence

2. KAITO · KAITO

71.0/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 34.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 11.6 = 71.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

34.4/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 154 pp · RS-sector 130.4 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

11.6/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $28,109,490 · vol 131.3%

100% evidence

3. Allora · ALLO

69.6/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 34.5 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.1 = 69.6

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

34.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 359.9 pp · RS-sector 37.8 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

10.1/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $42,088,033 · vol 227.8%

100% evidence

4. Law Blocks AI · LBT

67.3/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 33.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.4 = 67.3

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

33.9/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 64 pp · RS-sector 19.3 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

8.4/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $737,869 · vol 38.8%

100% evidence

5. SentismAI · SENTIS

65.7/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 32.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.4 = 65.7

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

32.3/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 224.1 pp · RS-sector 93.9 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

8.4/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $2,198,598 · vol 66.3%

100% evidence

6. Velvet · VELVET

64.2/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 30.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.3 = 64.2

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

30.9/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 366.3 pp · RS-sector 1.2 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

8.3/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $18,243,709 · vol 549.4%

100% evidence

7. Codatta · XNY

63.6/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 32.4 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 6.2 = 63.6

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

32.4/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 31 pp · RS-sector 58.5 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

6.2/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $3,408,946 · vol 130.1%

100% evidence

8. AWE Network · AWE

62.0/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 28.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.7 = 62.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

28.3/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 21.8 pp · RS-sector 1.9 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

8.7/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $3,274,775 · vol 92.6%

100% evidence

9. Nosana · NOS

60.9/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 30.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 5.0 = 60.9

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

30.9/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 24.4 pp · RS-sector 8.5 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

5.0/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $190,093 · vol 73.9%

100% evidence

10. Bluwhale · BLUAI

60.7/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 26.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 9.4 = 60.7

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

26.3/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 26.6 pp · RS-sector -4.4 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

9.4/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $10,727,837 · vol 212.3%

100% evidence

11. Pieverse · PIEVERSE

60.5/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 25.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 10.2 = 60.5

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

25.3/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 4.9 pp · RS-sector 8.6 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

10.2/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $12,575,951 · vol 97.9%

100% evidence

12. Chainlink · LINK

60.3/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 21.3 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 14.0 = 60.3

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

21.3/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 6.6 pp · RS-sector 20.4 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

14.0/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $222,852,350 · vol 41.8%

100% evidence

13. Arweave · AR

57.4/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 20.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 12.3 = 57.4

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

20.1/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 11.8 pp · RS-sector 5.8 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

12.3/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $10,164,623 · vol 51.5%

100% evidence

14. EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) · EIGEN

57.1/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 68% evidence

Exact sum: 21.8 + 14.2 + 9.9 + 11.2 = 57.1

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

21.8/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 33.7 pp · RS-sector -3.7 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

14.2/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

17% evidence

9.9/20Value capture

Fee yield 30.93% · revenue yield 0%

65% evidence

11.2/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $18,173,329 · vol 96.7%

100% evidence

15. OpenServ · SERV

57.0/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 28.7 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 3.3 = 57.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

28.7/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 105.4 pp · RS-sector -6.8 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

3.3/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $723,929 · vol 144.6%

100% evidence

16. ZIGChain · ZIG

56.0/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 22.9 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 8.1 = 56.0

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

22.9/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 59.1 pp · RS-sector -0.7 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

8.1/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $2,689,014 · vol 59.9%

100% evidence

17. Aethir · ATH

55.8/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 13% evidence

Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.0 + 15.8 + 7.5 = 55.8

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC — · RS-sector — · 200-DMA —

0% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

15.8/20Value capture

Fee yield 107.4% · revenue yield 21.48%

65% evidence

7.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume — · vol —

0% evidence

18. BankrCoin · BNKR

55.7/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 13% evidence

Exact sum: 17.5 + 15.0 + 15.7 + 7.5 = 55.7

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

17.5/35Market leadership

RS-BTC — · RS-sector — · 200-DMA —

0% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

15.7/20Value capture

Fee yield 70.68% · revenue yield 28.28%

65% evidence

7.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume — · vol —

0% evidence

19. Internet Computer · ICP

55.6/100 · Tape-led · on-chain proof incomplete · 55% evidence

Exact sum: 18.2 + 14.4 + 10.0 + 13.0 = 55.6

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

18.2/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 5.3 pp · RS-sector 5.8 pp · 200-DMA below

100% evidence

14.4/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

17% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

13.0/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $35,678,741 · vol 42.5%

100% evidence

20. OlaXBT · AIO

55.6/100 · Illiquid · research only · 50% evidence

Exact sum: 26.1 + 15.0 + 10.0 + 4.5 = 55.6

Decision use: Treat this as a tape-led lead. Require native activity confirmation before upgrading research priority.

26.1/35Market leadership

RS-BTC 32.9 pp · RS-sector 0 pp · 200-DMA above

100% evidence

15.0/30Network & economic traction

Fees — · revenue — · users —

0% evidence

10.0/20Value capture

Fee yield — · revenue yield —

0% evidence

4.5/15Liquidity & downside risk

30d median volume $1,319,678 · vol 143.2%

100% evidence

Showing 20 of 110 ranked assets

01 · complete calendar-quarter evidence

Which projects are generating the most network fees?

LeaderAethir · $97.9M

Gap99% versus #2

Persistence1 assets have positive comparable growth

Coverage11/110 assets

Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.

This conclusion weakens if: fee growth turns negative across two complete calendar quarters or fee coverage falls below the stated threshold.

Trailing 12-month fees is the sum of the latest four complete calendar quarters. Growth compares that sum with the prior four-quarter sum.

Trailing 12-month feestop five

1Aethir ATH$97.9M

2EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN$49.2M

3BankrCoin BNKR$30.0M

4Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL$19.9M

5NEAR Protocol NEAR$1.9M

Fee growthtop five

1The Graph GRT+27%

2NEAR Protocol NEAR-69%

3IoTeX IOTX-74%

4Morpheus AI MOR-75%

Network fees · asset comparison

11/110 level · 4/110 change

Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first

Asset	Trailing 12-month fees	Fee growth
near	$140.7K	-69%
kaito	—	—
allora	—	—
law-blocks	—	—
sentismai	—	—
velvet	—	—
codatta	—	—
stp-network	—	—
nosana	—	—
bluwhale	—	—
pieverse	—	—
chainlink	—	—
arweave	—	—
eigenlayer	$2.5M	—
openserv	—	—
zignaly	—	—
aethir	$12.1M	—
bankercoin-2	$11.2M	—
internet-computer	—	—
olaxbt	—	—
pearl-2	—	—
perle	—	—
talus	—	—
render-token	—	—
bittensor	—	—
virtual-protocol	$997.6K	—
arkham	—	—
subsquid	—	—
akash-network	—	—
iota-2	—	—
origintrail	—	—
infinity-ground	—	—
sentient	—	—
acurast	—	—
ai-rig-complex	—	—
apriori	$21.9K	—
chainopera-ai	—	—
cortex-2	—	—
dolphin-2	—	—
freysa-ai	—	—
grass	—	—
infinit	—	—
meet48	—	—
swarm-network	—	—
the-innovation-game	—	—
tokenos-ai	—	—
trusta-ai	—	—
unibase	—	—
unifai-network	—	—
unit-00-rei	—	—
v-i-t-r-i-o-l-network	—	—
venice-token	$623.9K	—
io	—	—
holoworld	—	—
proprietary-trading-network	—	—
chaingpt	—	—
golem	—	—
gensyn	—	—
sapien-2	—	—
robo-token-2	—	—
mira-3	—	—
fetch-ai	—	—
nillion	—	—
ocean-protocol	—	—
kite-2	—	—
quack-ai	—	—
aioz-network	—	—
affine	—	—
okzoo	—	—
celium	—	—
nova-3	—	—
the-graph	$97.2K	+27%
elrond-erd-2	—	—
chutes	—	—
morpheusai	$97.3K	-75%
targon	—	—
victoria-vr	—	—
dkargo	—	—
theta-fuel	—	—
tagger	—	—
vana	$642	—
qubic-network	—	—
livepeer	—	—
hippius	—	—
concordium	—	—
auki-labs	—	—
theta-token	—	—
rujira	—	—
everipedia	—	—
chromaway	—	—
iexec-rlc	—	—
score	—	—
templar	—	—
flock-2	$48.7K	—
opengradient	—	—
carv	—	—
zelcash	—	—
arcblock	—	—
zentry	—	—
sahara-ai	—	—
singularitynet	—	—
zero-gravity	—	—
singularry	—	—
tokenbot-2	—	—
alchemist-ai	—	—
gradients	—	—
secret	—	—
world-mobile-token	—	—
iotex	$1.6K	-74%
story-2	$671	—

Showing 20 of 110 assets

02 · complete calendar-quarter evidence

Which projects convert activity into protocol revenue?

LeaderVirtuals Protocol · $19.9M

Gap2% versus #2

Persistence0 assets have positive comparable growth

Coverage8/110 assets

Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.

This conclusion weakens if: revenue growth turns negative or the revenue-to-fees take rate falls for two complete calendar quarters.

Trailing 12-month revenue is the sum of the latest four complete calendar quarters. Growth compares that sum with the prior four-quarter sum.

Trailing 12-month revenuetop five

1Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL$19.9M

2Aethir ATH$19.6M

3BankrCoin BNKR$12.0M

4NEAR Protocol NEAR$1.9M

5FLOCK FLOCK$1.0M

Revenue growthtop five

1NEAR Protocol NEAR-69%

2Morpheus AI MOR-75%

3The Graph GRT-99%

Protocol revenue · asset comparison

8/110 level · 3/110 change

Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first

Asset	Trailing 12-month revenue	Revenue growth
near	$134.8K	-69%
kaito	—	—
allora	—	—
law-blocks	—	—
sentismai	—	—
velvet	—	—
codatta	—	—
stp-network	—	—
nosana	—	—
bluwhale	—	—
pieverse	—	—
chainlink	—	—
arweave	—	—
eigenlayer	$0	—
openserv	—	—
zignaly	—	—
aethir	$2.4M	—
bankercoin-2	$4.5M	—
internet-computer	—	—
olaxbt	—	—
pearl-2	—	—
perle	—	—
talus	—	—
render-token	—	—
bittensor	—	—
virtual-protocol	$997.6K	—
arkham	—	—
subsquid	—	—
akash-network	—	—
iota-2	—	—
origintrail	—	—
infinity-ground	—	—
sentient	—	—
acurast	—	—
ai-rig-complex	—	—
apriori	$3.4K	—
chainopera-ai	—	—
cortex-2	—	—
dolphin-2	—	—
freysa-ai	—	—
grass	—	—
infinit	—	—
meet48	—	—
swarm-network	—	—
the-innovation-game	—	—
tokenos-ai	—	—
trusta-ai	—	—
unibase	—	—
unifai-network	—	—
unit-00-rei	—	—
v-i-t-r-i-o-l-network	—	—
venice-token	$623.9K	—
io	—	—
holoworld	—	—
proprietary-trading-network	—	—
chaingpt	—	—
golem	—	—
gensyn	—	—
sapien-2	—	—
robo-token-2	—	—
mira-3	—	—
fetch-ai	—	—
nillion	—	—
ocean-protocol	—	—
kite-2	—	—
quack-ai	—	—
aioz-network	—	—
affine	—	—
okzoo	—	—
celium	—	—
nova-3	—	—
the-graph	$2	-99%
elrond-erd-2	—	—
chutes	—	—
morpheusai	$97.3K	-75%
targon	—	—
victoria-vr	—	—
dkargo	—	—
theta-fuel	—	—
tagger	—	—
vana	—	—
qubic-network	—	—
livepeer	—	—
hippius	—	—
concordium	—	—
auki-labs	—	—
theta-token	—	—
rujira	—	—
everipedia	—	—
chromaway	—	—
iexec-rlc	—	—
score	—	—
templar	—	—
flock-2	$48.7K	—
opengradient	—	—
carv	—	—
zelcash	—	—
arcblock	—	—
zentry	—	—
sahara-ai	—	—
singularitynet	—	—
zero-gravity	—	—
singularry	—	—
tokenbot-2	—	—
alchemist-ai	—	—
gradients	—	—
secret	—	—
world-mobile-token	—	—
iotex	—	—
story-2	—	—

Showing 20 of 110 assets

03 · complete calendar-quarter evidence

Where is capital actually committed on-chain?

LeaderEigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) · $4.4B

Gap3923% versus #2

Persistence1 assets have positive comparable growth

Coverage28/110 assets

Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture.

This conclusion weakens if: TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.

Quarter-end TVL uses protocol TVL first for protocol assets and exact-ID chain TVL for chain assets or where protocol TVL is unavailable. A blank is unavailable, not zero. Growth compares with the same complete quarter one year earlier.

Quarter-end TVLtop five

1EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN$4.4B

2NEAR Protocol NEAR$108.8M

3Bittensor TAO$41.7M

4Morpheus AI MOR$11.9M

5Internet Computer ICP$10.9M

TVL growthtop five

1Concordium CCD+299%

2ChainGPT CGPT-5.3%

3NEAR Protocol NEAR-24%

4Internet Computer ICP-59%

5EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN-62%

Total value locked · asset comparison

28/110 level · 13/110 change

Latest comparable data · top 20 shown first

Asset	Quarter-end TVL	TVL growth
near	$108.8M	-24%
kaito	$0	—
allora	—	—
law-blocks	—	—
sentismai	—	—
velvet	—	—
codatta	—	—
stp-network	—	—
nosana	—	—
bluwhale	—	—
pieverse	—	—
chainlink	—	—
arweave	—	—
eigenlayer	$4.4B	-62%
openserv	—	—
zignaly	$7.9M	—
aethir	$0	—
bankercoin-2	—	—
internet-computer	$10.9M	-59%
olaxbt	—	—
pearl-2	—	—
perle	—	—
talus	—	—
render-token	—	—
bittensor	$41.7M	—
virtual-protocol	$0	—
arkham	—	—
subsquid	—	—
akash-network	—	—
iota-2	—	—
origintrail	—	—
infinity-ground	—	—
sentient	—	—
acurast	—	—
ai-rig-complex	—	—
apriori	$521.9K	—
chainopera-ai	—	—
cortex-2	—	—
dolphin-2	—	—
freysa-ai	—	—
grass	—	—
infinit	$0	—
meet48	—	—
swarm-network	—	—
the-innovation-game	—	—
tokenos-ai	—	—
trusta-ai	—	—
unibase	—	—
unifai-network	—	—
unit-00-rei	—	—
v-i-t-r-i-o-l-network	—	—
venice-token	$0	—
io	—	—
holoworld	—	—
proprietary-trading-network	—	—
chaingpt	$38.2K	-5.3%
golem	—	—
gensyn	—	—
sapien-2	—	—
robo-token-2	—	—
mira-3	—	—
fetch-ai	—	—
nillion	—	—
ocean-protocol	—	—
kite-2	—	—
quack-ai	—	—
aioz-network	—	—
affine	—	—
okzoo	—	—
celium	—	—
nova-3	—	—
the-graph	$0	—
elrond-erd-2	$9.2M	-81%
chutes	—	—
morpheusai	$11.9M	-81%
targon	—	—
victoria-vr	—	—
dkargo	—	—
theta-fuel	—	—
tagger	—	—
vana	$238.1K	-90%
qubic-network	$55.6K	-67%
livepeer	—	—
hippius	—	—
concordium	$1.5K	+299%
auki-labs	—	—
theta-token	$245.9K	-76%
rujira	—	—
everipedia	$0	—
chromaway	$308.6K	—
iexec-rlc	—	—
score	—	—
templar	—	—
flock-2	$0	—
opengradient	—	—
carv	—	—
zelcash	—	—
arcblock	—	—
zentry	—	—
sahara-ai	—	—
singularitynet	$0	—
zero-gravity	$3.3M	—
singularry	—	—
tokenbot-2	—	—
alchemist-ai	—	—
gradients	—	—
secret	$1.3M	-84%
world-mobile-token	$0	—
iotex	$1.3M	-91%
story-2	$327.5K	-98%

Showing 20 of 110 assets

04 · let price answer last

Which assets lead on price and relative strength?

Velvet leads the AI tape on Bitcoin-relative strength at +366% over 90 days. 14 of 70 covered assets are above their own 200-day average. Price shows what happened; BTC-relative strength shows whether the asset beat crypto’s opportunity-cost benchmark. Both lines run through 2026-07-24.

Complete set · no silent drops

Which assets are in AI?

110 priced assets are assigned to AI, listed below by rank with every one visible — including tape-only names that publish no protocol activity. Each asset has exactly one canonical functional theme, chosen by a specific-to-general first match on its categories. Pegged, wrapped, liquid-staking receipt and tokenized-asset instruments are excluded because they have no independent price discovery.

Rank	Asset	Price	90d	RS-BTC	200-DMA	30d vol	Median volume	Price quality	Activity source	Score	Evidence
1	NEAR Protocol NEAR	$1.81	+29%	+46%	Above	64%	$210.2M	usable	protocol + chain TVL	62.3	87%
2	KAITO KAITO	$0.9572	+137%	+154%	Above	131%	$28.1M	usable	protocol	71.0	50%
3	Allora ALLO	$0.5176	+342%	+360%	Above	228%	$42.1M	usable	tape only	69.6	50%
4	Law Blocks AI LBT	$0.2961	+47%	+64%	Above	39%	$737.9K	usable	tape only	67.3	50%
5	SentismAI SENTIS	$0.2056	+207%	+224%	Above	66%	$2.2M	usable	tape only	65.7	50%
6	Velvet VELVET	$0.4467	+349%	+366%	Above	549%	$18.2M	usable	tape only	64.2	50%
7	Codatta XNY	$0.0077	+14%	+31%	Above	130%	$3.4M	usable	tape only	63.6	50%
8	AWE Network AWE	$0.0568	+4.4%	+22%	Above	93%	$3.3M	usable	tape only	62.0	50%
9	Nosana NOS	$0.2586	+7.0%	+24%	Above	74%	$190.1K	usable	tape only	60.9	50%
10	Bluwhale BLUAI	$0.0122	+9.2%	+27%	Above	212%	$10.7M	usable	tape only	60.7	50%
11	Pieverse PIEVERSE	$0.6580	-13%	+4.9%	Above	98%	$12.6M	usable	tape only	60.5	50%
12	Chainlink LINK	$8.33	-11%	+6.6%	Below	42%	$222.9M	usable	tape only	60.3	50%
13	Arweave AR	$1.84	-5.7%	+12%	Below	52%	$10.2M	usable	tape only	57.4	50%
14	EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) EIGEN	$0.2077	+16%	+34%	Below	97%	$18.2M	usable	protocol	57.1	68%
15	OpenServ SERV	$0.0312	+88%	+105%	Above	145%	$723.9K	usable	tape only	57.0	50%
16	ZIGChain ZIG	$0.0410	+42%	+59%	Below	60%	$2.7M	usable	chain TVL	56.0	50%
17	Aethir ATH	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	protocol	55.8	13%
18	BankrCoin BNKR	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	protocol	55.7	13%
19	Internet Computer ICP	$2.14	-12%	+5.3%	Below	43%	$35.7M	usable	chain TVL	55.6	55%
20	OlaXBT AIO	$0.1091	+16%	+33%	Above	143%	$1.3M	usable	tape only	55.6	50%
21	Pearl PRL	$0.0004	+0.2%	+18%	Below	7%	$3	usable	tape only	54.8	50%
22	Perle PRL	$0.0004	+0.2%	+18%	Below	7%	$3	usable	tape only	54.8	50%
23	Talus US	$0.0477	—	—	Above	281%	$8.1M	usable	tape only	54.6	23%
24	Render RENDER	$1.46	-19%	-1.9%	Below	40%	$19.0M	usable	tape only	54.5	50%
25	Bittensor TAO	$196.60	—	—	—	—	$13.3M	usable	chain TVL	54.3	12%
26	Virtuals Protocol VIRTUAL	$0.5873	-16%	+1.4%	Below	83%	$44.6M	usable	protocol	54.2	63%
27	Arkham ARKM	$0.1057	-12%	+5.9%	Below	52%	$27.9M	usable	tape only	54.2	50%
28	SQD SQD	$0.0325	+2.7%	+20%	Below	61%	$4.4M	usable	tape only	54.1	50%
29	Akash Network AKT	$0.4922	+2.6%	+20%	Below	58%	$3.5M	usable	tape only	53.4	50%
30	iota SN9	$6.54	+12%	+29%	Below	62%	$209.3K	usable	tape only	53.2	50%
31	OriginTrail TRAC	$0.2792	-4.5%	+13%	Below	94%	$4.1M	usable	tape only	52.5	50%
32	Infinity Ground AIN	$0.0099	-0.2%	+17%	Below	90%	$31	usable	tape only	52.0	50%
33	Sentient SENT	$0.0141	—	—	—	—	$1.4M	usable	tape only	50.7	12%
34	Acurast ACU	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
35	AI Rig Complex ARC	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
36	aPriori APR	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	protocol	50.0	0%
37	ChainOpera AI COAI	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
38	Cortex CX	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
39	Dolphin POD	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
40	Freysa AI FAI	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
41	Grass GRASS	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
42	INFINIT IN	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	protocol	50.0	0%
43	MEET48 IDOL	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
44	Swarm Network TRUTH	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
45	The Innovation Game TIG	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
46	TokenOS AI TOS	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
47	Trusta AI TA	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
48	Unibase UB	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
49	UnifAI Network UAI	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
50	Rei REI	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
51	V.I.T.R.I.O.L. Network VIT	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	tape only	50.0	0%
52	Venice Token VVV	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	protocol	50.0	0%
53	io.net IO	$0.1495	—	—	—	—	$1.0M	usable	tape only	49.7	12%
54	Holoworld HOLO	$0.0656	—	—	—	—	$804.8K	usable	tape only	49.4	12%
55	Vanta Network SN8	$9.14	—	—	—	—	$614.3K	usable	tape only	49.3	12%
56	ChainGPT CGPT	$0.0186	-27%	-9.8%	Below	52%	$8.8M	usable	protocol	48.9	55%
57	Golem GLM	$0.0998	-26%	-8.5%	Below	52%	$4.7M	usable	tape only	48.9	50%
58	Gensyn AI	$0.0200	—	—	—	—	$314.8K	usable	tape only	48.5	12%
59	Sapien SAPIEN	$0.0776	-18%	-0.4%	Below	69%	$3.8M	usable	tape only	48.3	50%
60	Fabric Protocol ROBO	$0.0118	—	—	—	—	$664.1K	usable	tape only	47.6	12%
61	Mira MIRA	$0.0440	—	—	—	—	$435.2K	usable	tape only	47.5	12%
62	Artificial Superintelligence Alliance FET	$0.1518	-27%	-9.9%	Below	48%	$117.5M	usable	tape only	46.9	50%
63	Nillion NIL	$0.0366	—	—	—	—	$447.7K	usable	tape only	46.7	12%
64	Ocean Protocol OCEAN	$0.1063	-19%	-1.4%	Below	122%	$22.3K	usable	tape only	46.5	50%
65	Kite KITE	$0.1086	-25%	-7.3%	Below	96%	$41.4M	usable	tape only	46.4	50%
66	Quack AI Q	$0.0000	—	—	—	—	$0	usable	tape only	46.2	12%
67	AIOZ Network AIOZ	$0.0486	-22%	-4.5%	Below	35%	$3.1M	usable	tape only	46.0	50%
68	affine SN120	$10.23	—	—	—	51%	$359.6K	usable	tape only	45.9	23%
69	OKZOO AIOT	$0.0513	-15%	+2.9%	Below	125%	$884.8K	usable	tape only	45.8	50%
70	lium SN51	$11.72	-18%	-0.3%	Below	60%	$266.9K	usable	tape only	45.7	50%
71	NOVA SN68	$3.80	—	—	—	59%	$208.6K	usable	tape only	44.7	23%
72	The Graph GRT	$0.0165	—	—	—	—	$565.6K	usable	protocol	44.6	44%
73	MultiversX EGLD	$2.90	-33%	-16%	Below	75%	$5.0M	usable	chain TVL	44.5	55%
74	Chutes SN64	$15.74	-22%	-4.6%	Below	63%	$651.8K	usable	tape only	43.7	50%
75	Morpheus AI MOR	—	—	—	—	—	—	usable	protocol	43.7	37%
76	Targon SN4	$10.69	-27%	-9.7%	Below	52%	$388.7K	usable	tape only	43.6	50%
77	Victoria VR VR	$0.0015	-16%	+1.6%	Below	160%	$1.0M	usable	tape only	43.6	50%
78	dKargo DKA	$0.0039	-33%	-16%	Below	73%	$1.3M	usable	tape only	43.2	50%
79	Theta Fuel TFUEL	$0.0079	-35%	-18%	Below	44%	$1.5M	usable	tape only	42.9	50%
80	TAGGER TAG	$0.0023	-37%	-19%	Below	0%	$0	usable	tape only	42.8	42%
81	Vana VANA	$1.16	—	—	—	—	$569.2K	usable	protocol + chain TVL	42.7	25%
82	Qubic QUBIC	$0.0000	—	—	Below	—	$959.4K	return withheld · discontinuity	chain TVL	42.3	24%
83	Livepeer LPT	$1.41	-36%	-18%	Below	42%	$5.8M	usable	tape only	42.2	50%
84	Hippius SN75	$2.91	—	—	—	67%	$139.2K	usable	tape only	42.2	23%
85	Concordium CCD	$0.0034	-26%	-8.2%	Below	104%	$144.2K	usable	chain TVL	42.1	55%
86	Auki AUKI	$0.0047	-16%	+1.1%	Below	101%	$29.4K	usable	tape only	42.1	50%
87	Theta Network THETA	$0.1334	-39%	-22%	Below	58%	$5.9M	usable	chain TVL	41.5	55%
88	Rujira RUJI	$0.1758	—	—	—	130%	$7.7K	usable	tape only	40.8	23%
89	IQ IQ	$0.0007	-34%	-17%	Below	28%	$574.5K	usable	protocol	40.5	50%
90	Chromia CHR	$0.0133	-40%	-23%	Below	75%	$2.9M	usable	chain TVL	39.6	50%
91	iExec RLC RLC	$0.2766	-40%	-22%	Below	54%	$1.5M	usable	tape only	39.4	50%
92	Score SN44	$6.24	-26%	-8.5%	Below	68%	$379.3K	usable	tape only	39.4	50%
93	τemplar SN3	$4.29	-28%	-10%	Below	59%	$205.0K	usable	tape only	39.2	50%
94	FLOCK FLOCK	$0.0306	-55%	-38%	Below	78%	$2.6M	usable	protocol	38.8	63%
95	OpenGradient OPG	$0.1029	-63%	-45%	—	84%	$18.9M	usable	tape only	38.8	43%
96	CARV CARV	$0.0302	-51%	-34%	Below	92%	$5.1M	usable	tape only	38.7	50%
97	Flux FLUX	$0.0404	-42%	-25%	Below	47%	$3.2M	usable	tape only	37.6	50%
98	Arcblock ABT	$0.1891	-39%	-22%	Below	53%	$39.0K	usable	tape only	37.3	50%
99	Zentry ZENT	$0.0020	-43%	-26%	Below	44%	$1.6M	usable	tape only	36.1	50%
100	Sahara AI SAHARA	$0.0088	-62%	-45%	Below	49%	$12.3M	usable	tape only	35.9	50%
101	SingularityNET AGIX	$0.0631	-29%	-12%	Below	59%	$1.8K	usable	protocol	35.9	50%
102	0G 0G	$0.1724	-70%	-52%	Below	99%	$13.3M	usable	chain TVL	35.3	50%
103	Singularry SINGULARRY	$0.0145	-53%	-36%	—	169%	$21.6K	usable	tape only	34.8	43%
104	tokenbot CLANKER	$12.82	-49%	-31%	Below	57%	$2.4M	usable	tape only	34.5	50%
105	Alchemist AI ALCH	$0.0285	-64%	-47%	Below	195%	$10.0M	usable	tape only	34.3	50%
106	Gradients SN56	$3.29	-39%	-21%	Below	45%	$47.9K	usable	tape only	34.1	50%
107	Secret SCRT	$0.0383	-65%	-48%	Below	123%	$7.0M	usable	chain TVL	33.6	55%
108	World Mobile Token WMTX	$0.0260	-59%	-41%	Below	48%	$1.3M	usable	protocol	32.1	50%
109	IoTeX IOTX	$0.0023	-52%	-35%	Below	58%	$978.6K	usable	protocol + chain TVL	26.0	73%
110	Data Network DATA	$0.0002	-77%	-60%	Below	1,130%	$2	usable	protocol + chain TVL	23.5	63%

Showing 20 of 110 assets

Methodology · boundaries make the answer useful

What can make this comparison misleading?

This AI comparison names 5 ways its own evidence can mislead, all listed below. The largest is that crypto network activity is not company earnings: protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders. Coverage is also uneven — 3 of 110 assets carry enough native evidence to rank on more than price.

Crypto network activity is not company earnings. Protocol revenue does not automatically accrue to token holders.
Market-cap values are a dated universe snapshot, not point-in-time historical supply data.
Current category labels are applied to historical prices; this creates survivorship and taxonomy hindsight.
Funding rates, open interest, liquidations, exchange flows, unlock schedules, historical circulating supply and developer activity are not held and are not inferred.
Equal weighting is used for sector history because true historical market-cap weights are unavailable.

Price and technicalsThrough 2026-07-24. Five-year weekly observations benchmarked to Bitcoin.

Protocol activityThrough 2026-07-24. Fees, revenue, protocol TVL and DEX volume.

Chain activityUsers and transactions through unavailable; separately sourced chain TVL through 2026-07-24.

Market capSnapshot dated 2026-07-04; no historical supply series is implied.

Questions the page should answer directly

Crypto analysis FAQs

These 18 answers cover the questions this page can settle from data it holds — what the category is, how the score is built, what the coverage gaps are, and what would change the read. Every answer below is also present in the page’s FAQ schema and in its plain-text rendition. None of them is a recommendation.

What is AI crypto?

AI crypto refers to cryptocurrency projects grouped by what they actually do rather than by market fashion. This page tracks 110 such coins by market cap, price and Bitcoin-relative strength, with protocol fees and revenue where a project publishes them. Readings are as of 2026-07-24.

What is the total market cap of AI crypto coins?

The AI coins on this page are tracked against a universe of 894 of the top 1,000 crypto currency assets by market cap. Market-cap metadata is dated 2026-07-04, separately from the price series, and each coin's own figure is in the table on this page.

Are AI crypto coins outperforming Bitcoin?

AI has returned +26.3% versus Bitcoin over 52 weeks and +15.2% over 13 weeks on an equal-weight current-member index. 14/70 covered assets are above their 200-day averages as of 2026-07-24.

Which AI asset has the strongest research score?

NEAR Protocol ranks first at 62.3/100: 30.0 + 13.4 + 6.5 + 12.4 = 62.3. It is labelled “Constructive watch · market gate closed” with 87% overall evidence and 74% native-economics evidence.

How is the AI 4-factor score calculated?

The exact sum is Market leadership /35 + Network and economic traction /30 + Value capture /20 + Liquidity and downside risk /15. Missing data pulls only the affected factor toward neutral and lowers evidence; it is never silently reweighted.

Why can a AI asset be labelled tape-led?

Tape-led means price and relative-strength evidence exists but less than half of the native traction and value-capture evidence is available. Such assets remain visible but rank below fully evidenced assets.

Does protocol revenue accrue to the token?

Not necessarily. Protocol fees and revenue measure network economics; token-holder value depends on the protocol’s burn, buyback, staking, distribution and governance rules. This page never assumes accrual merely because revenue exists.

Does crypto have a P/E or PEG ratio?

No comparable company-style P/E or PEG is used. Where coverage permits, the page shows network fee yield and protocol-revenue yield against a dated market-cap snapshot, with an explicit token-accrual caveat.

How much history is shown for AI?

The page shows five years of weekly price and relative-strength history and 20 complete calendar quarters of on-chain activity where available. Missing periods remain gaps.

Why do the crypto data dates differ?

Prices and technical metrics run through 2026-07-24; protocol activity through 2026-07-24; chain users and transactions through the latest available chain date; chain TVL through 2026-07-24; market capitalisation is a separate snapshot dated 2026-07-04.

Are stablecoins and wrapped tokens included in AI?

No. Pegged, wrapped, liquid-staking receipt and tokenized-asset instruments are excluded because they do not have independent price discovery.

Can one token appear in multiple raw crypto categories?

Yes, but public MLA pages assign each asset to exactly one functional theme using a specific-to-general first-match taxonomy. AI therefore has one canonical membership list.

What would invalidate the current AI theme read?

The read weakens if the sector’s 13-week relative return versus Bitcoin falls below zero, fewer than one-third of covered assets remain above the 200-day average, and the leading asset’s native activity also contracts.

Does this page include funding rates, open interest or token unlocks?

No. Those datasets are not held in the current research store, so the page names them as unavailable rather than inferring them from price.

Which projects are generating the most network fees?

Aethir leads AI crypto on Trailing 12-month fees at $97.9M, 99% ahead of EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer). 1 of 4 assets with comparable change data is growing, fastest at The Graph. Coverage is 11 of the 110 assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if fee growth turns negative across two complete calendar quarters or fee coverage falls below the stated threshold.

Which projects convert activity into protocol revenue?

Virtuals Protocol leads AI crypto on Trailing 12-month revenue at $19.9M, 2% ahead of Aethir. 0 of 3 assets with comparable change data are growing. Coverage is 8 of the 110 assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if revenue growth turns negative or the revenue-to-fees take rate falls for two complete calendar quarters.

Where is capital actually committed on-chain?

EigenCloud (prev. EigenLayer) leads AI crypto on Quarter-end TVL at $4.4B, 3923% ahead of NEAR Protocol. 1 of 13 assets with comparable change data is growing, fastest at Concordium. Coverage is 28 of the 110 assets in this theme, through the Q2 2026 calendar quarter. Where a project publishes nothing, the cell stays blank rather than being read as zero. Investor read: Use this as a network-economics research lead, not token-holder earnings. Verify whether the measured activity accrues to the token before treating scale as value capture. This conclusion weakens if TVL rises while fees and users fall; that pattern can be incentive-funded mercenary liquidity.

Which AI project has the largest fee base?

Aethir leads covered trailing-12-month fees at $97.9M. Coverage is 11/110; this is network activity, not automatically token-holder income.