Prakash Industries Ltd

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

Prakash Industries Ltd trades at ₹124, in a downtrend and 1 weeks into that stage. That is −12.5% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 21% of a 52-week range of ₹112 to ₹170. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (4 weeks and counting).

Today the stock is in a downtrend — week 1 of stage 4, confirmed. At ₹124 it trades −12.5% versus its 200-day average and sits at 21% of its 52-week range (₹112–₹170).

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.3 years the stock moved +395% while the NIFTY 500 moved +274% — ahead of the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (4 weeks and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-06-25) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 35th percentile of its own range.

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

Prakash Industries Ltd trades at 6.7× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 35% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 8.1×, measured across 10.4 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 6.7× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 35% of the time, against a long-run median of 8.1× measured over 10.4 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

Why the multiple sits where it does: over the past year annual EPS moved −6.3% against a −30.7% price move — earnings outran the price, pushing the multiple DOWN its own range.

The price move, decomposed: over 5y, of the +9.8%/yr price move, ~+28.6%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−18.8 pp from the multiple (compressing); over 10y, of the +13.9%/yr price move, ~+21.4%/yr came from earnings growth and ~−7.5 pp from the multiple (compressing). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

A quarterly PEG curve, which only the second data source carries, is not drawn on this page: its two data sources do not share enough overlapping reported history to be compared. A figure nobody could check is not used to price growth — the gap is a decision, not missing data.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

Stage: Mixed Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

Prakash Industries Ltd reads as mixed on its fundamental arc. Mixed — the growth curves are steadily positive, but ROCE at 10.0% is below the 15% bar this page requires to call it Consistent. The read is built from 10 quarters across 3 curves, on partial evidence.

Why it matters: when the curves disagree, the per-curve reads above matter more than any single verdict.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Return readings here are annual, not quarterly — read as level and direction only; they can confirm the growth curves but never drive the stage on their own.

A partial read: at least one curve is short, or the returns curve is not the computed quarterly series — hold the stage word a little more loosely.

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

4-Factor Sector Score

45.0/100 — rank 11 of 17 in Steel Products · 77% evidence confidence

Prakash Industries Ltd scores 45.0 out of 100 against the 17 companies it is compared with in Steel Products, ranking 11. Cheap but unconfirmed: require improving earnings before treating the valuation as an opportunity.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 12.1 + 13.8 + 13.5 + 5.6 = 45. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

Prakash Industries Ltd reported ₹920 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +8.9% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 5.4% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹3,479 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹3,479 Cr.

Prakash Industries Ltd reported ₹920 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, +8.9% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at 5.4% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹3,479 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹3,479 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹3,479 Cr (−13.3% on the year), capping 10 years at 5.4% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹920 Cr, +8.9% year on year.

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −12.2% growth against the decade's 5.4% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −13.3% over the last 4 quarters against −2.7%/yr over the last 8 — rolling over; TTM profit −6.2% vs −2.2%/yr — rolling over.

→ Revenue grew — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: 16.0% this quarter (+0.0 pp YoY).

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

Prakash Industries Ltd's operating margin is 16.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 9.0% to 22.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

Prakash Industries Ltd's operating margin is 16.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, +0.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 9.0% to 22.0%. The current quarter sits inside that band.

The latest quarter's operating margin is 16.0%, +0.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged 9.0%–22.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −0.1 pp year on year while gross margin went +4.6 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

→ Margins held — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit +2.2% in the latest quarter.

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

Prakash Industries Ltd earned ₹93.0 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +2.2% year on year. It is the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹333 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 30.6%. That is 10.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹91.0 Cr.

Prakash Industries Ltd earned ₹93.0 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter, +2.2% year on year. It is the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹333 Cr. The 10-year compound rate is 30.6%. That is 10.1% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned ₹91.0 Cr.

Mar 26 profit was ₹93.0 Cr, +2.2% year on year — the 2nd consecutive quarter of growth. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹333 Cr (−6.2%), and the 10-year compound rate is 30.6%.

Why profit moved: revenue contributed +8.9% and the margin +0.0 pp — the quarter was revenue-led, with the margin roughly flat.

Pace comparison, last four quarters: profit −6.0% vs revenue −12.2%. Profit is growing faster than sales — fixed costs are being spread over a bigger base, and each extra rupee of revenue drops more to the bottom line.

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 101% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 101% of Prakash Industries Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹299 Cr of operating cash against ₹333 Cr of profit. After ₹388 Cr of capital spending, ₹−89.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹299 Cr against reported profit of ₹333 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−89.0 Cr after ₹388 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 101% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

Why conversion sits at 101%: the cash cycle stretched 46 days between FY21 and FY26 — more of each rupee of profit waits inside the cycle before arriving.

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: a 84-day cycle and ₹668 Cr of building.

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

Prakash Industries Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs 84 days in FY26, up from 38 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹668 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹3,479 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹9.5 Cr, so roughly ₹801 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 21 days, inventory at 86 days — roughly 2.8 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of 84 days, looser than FY21's 38.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 86 days to sell; customers pay about 21 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 22 days — netting out to the 84-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹3,479 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹9.5 Cr — so the 84-day loop keeps roughly ₹801 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹668 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹464 Cr of depreciation — building somewhat ahead of wear-and-tear. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹197 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is 10% and the ROIC − WACC spread is −2.7 pp.

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified

Prakash Industries Ltd earns a ROCE of 10% in FY26. That is up from a trough of 3% in FY16. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −2.7 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is 9.6% net margin on 0.73× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is 10%, recovered from a FY16 trough of 3% — the full ladder below shows the fall and the climb, undoctored.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): 9.6% net margin × 0.73× asset turns × 1.32× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 9.3% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: 9.3% − 12.0% = a −2.7 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is 0.14.

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified

Prakash Industries Ltd carries total debt of ₹515 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹3,588 Cr as of Mar 26, a debt-to-equity of 0.14 — effectively unlevered. On the annual view that ratio went from 0.19 in FY22 to 0.14 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Mar 26: total debt of ₹515 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹3,588 Cr — a debt-to-equity of 0.14. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 0.19 (FY22) to 0.14 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: Foreign institutions cut 1.2 points over 8 quarters.

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

Foreign institutions cut 1.2 points of Prakash Industries Ltd over 8 quarters, the biggest move on the register. That takes foreign institutions to 3.7% of the company. Promoters moved +0.1 points over the same window, to 44.4%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Foreign institutions: −1.2 points over 8 quarters to 3.7%; Promoters: +0.1 points over 8 quarters to 44.4%; Domestic institutions: −0.1 points over 8 quarters to 0.0%.

🚨 Why the register moved: foreign institutions drove it (−1.2 points) — distribution into the market’s bid.

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

Prakash Industries Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Frequently asked questions