Sector Alpha Week of 2026-07-24
Sector Alpha — machine-written from the numbers · Data as of 2026-07-24

BGR Energy Systems Ltd

BGRENERGY
Infra - Engineering - General

BGR Energy Systems Ltd's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. The latest quarter's headline profit is a one-off item (larger than a full quarter's revenue), not money the business earned. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup.

The sharpest disagreement: the P/E sits at the 16th percentile of its own range, but the engine is deteriorating — cheap for a reason until the quarters turn.

The price is in a confirmed uptrend (81 weeks in) while the P/E sits at the 16th percentile of its own 4-year range. But the balance sheet is under water: net worth is negative, so shareholders sit behind everyone the company owes. The latest quarter's profit is a one-off, not an operating recovery. What settles it: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first.

Price
₹294
+188.1% 1Y
P/E
9.1×
16th pctile
of its own 4-year range
Revenue (Mar 26)
₹50.0 Cr
−61.5% YoY
Profit (Mar 26), incl. one-off
₹−771 Cr
one-off item — see below
Operating margin
−467.0%
−235.0 pp YoY
ROCE
−27%
FY26
ROIC
−27.3%
vs WACC 12.0% → −39.3 pp
Cash conversion
780%
of profit, last 3 FY
Unverified figures: Some figures on this page come from a second financial-data feed that could not be cross-checked against the primary source — the two do not share enough overlapping reported history to compare. They are drawn, because they are the only evidence there is, and every section carrying one is marked unverified.
01 · Price story

Price story Before the numbers, the tape. A stock price moves through four repeating seasons: a flat base (stage 1), an advance (2), a top (3), a decline (4). Where the price sits in that cycle frames everything below.

BGR Energy Systems Ltd trades at ₹294, in a confirmed uptrend and 81 weeks into that stage. That is +0.0% against its own 200-day average. It sits at 55% of a 52-week range of ₹112 to ₹444. On relative strength it is currently behind the NIFTY 500 on a trailing-13-week view (1 week and counting).

Today the stock is in a confirmed uptrend — week 81 of stage 2, confirmed. At ₹294 it trades +0.0% versus its 200-day average and sits at 55% of its 52-week range (₹112–₹444).

Jul 26: ₹294 Weekly closing price (₹) with 50- and 200-day averages; shaded bands mark the price stage (grey base, green advance, amber top, red decline). 3-year window.
+0.0% versus the 200-day line, week 81 of stage 2
Price50-day avg200-day avg
S2S4S2₹477₹358₹239₹121₹0.0₹294₹294Jul 23Apr 24Jan 25Oct 25Jul 26
S2S4S2₹477₹358₹239₹121₹0.0₹294₹294Jul 23Jan 25Jul 26
Beating or trailing, week by week since 2016 Each cell is one week from 2016 to now (544 weeks): the stock's trailing 13-week return minus the NIFTY 500's, green ahead / red behind (±25% ramp). Grey cells are the 13-week warm-up or weeks where the NIFTY 500 reading is not held.
trailing 13-week return vs the NIFTY 500
Mar 16Jul 26

Against the market, two honest reads. Cumulative: over the last 10.3 years the stock moved +186% while the NIFTY 500 moved +274% — behind the index over the full window. Recent form: on a trailing-13-week view the stock is currently behind (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-10) — the ribbon below is that same metric, week by week.

What would end the trend, mechanically: two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day line. That is the exit rule — no debates.

→ The trend is one thing; the bill is another. Are you paying up for it? Next: the P/E sits at the 16th percentile of its own range.

02 · Valuation

Valuation P/E is the price of ₹1 of annual profit: how many rupees the market pays for each rupee the company earns in a year.

BGR Energy Systems Ltd trades at 9.1× P/E, near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 16% of the time. Its long-run median P/E is 18.9×, measured across 3.9 years of weekly readings. This places the multiple against the stock’s own record, and says nothing about what the business is worth.

Today's P/E of 9.1× is near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 16% of the time, against a long-run median of 18.9× measured over 3.9 years of weekly readings. This is a comparison against the stock's own history — not a claim about what it is worth.

P/E 9.1× vs a 18.9× long-run median P/E, weekly (left axis); earnings per share, trailing twelve months, weekly (right axis). 3.9-year window; loss-period spikes above 57× shown pinned at the top. The eps (ttm) bars are red where the reading is lower than the quarter before.
near the bottom of its own range — cheaper only 16% of the time
P/EMedianEPS (TTM) (quarterly)
60.8×₹9.145.8×₹6.830.9×₹4.515.9×₹2.30.9×₹0.0×9.10×₹4Aug 16Jul 17Jul 18Jul 19Jun 20
60.8×₹9.145.8×₹6.830.9×₹4.515.9×₹2.30.9×₹0.0×9.10×₹4Aug 16Jul 18Jun 20
P/E
9.1×
16th percentile of 4y

The price move, decomposed: over 3y, of the +73.8%/yr price move, ~+21.0%/yr came from earnings growth and ~+52.8 pp from the multiple (expanding). The split is the honest approximate (price return minus earnings growth); it makes the rally itself visible instead of hiding it behind the percentile.

Put together: the multiple is low against its own past, so the story rests on the earnings line underneath it, not the multiple.

→ Cheap or dear rides on the earnings. Are they actually growing? Next: the fundamental stage — where the business sits in its arc, and how growth has compounded.

03 · Stage: No read

Stage: No read Every business sits somewhere on a fundamental arc, and this page names the spot before anything else. The last twelve quarters of revenue, profit and EPS growth — plus the return the business earns on its capital — are read as curves: Deteriorating (the curves are falling), Turning around (a trough has just formed and the last few quarters lift off it), Improving (the climb off the trough is sustained), Consistent (steadily positive with healthy returns), Topping out (still high but decelerating from the peak). When the curves genuinely disagree the read is Mixed; too little history is No read. CAGR (compound annual growth rate) is the smooth yearly pace that turns the starting value into the latest one — the fairest way to compare growth across different time spans. Read the columns together: if the 1-year number towers over the 10-year, recent growth is running hotter than the long-run trend. A dash means that window is not held, or the base year was a loss (where a growth rate is not meaningful).

BGR Energy Systems Ltd reads as no read on its fundamental arc. Under eight usable quarters on the growth trio — not enough history for an honest trajectory read. The read is built from 10 quarters across 1 curve, on partial evidence.

Three growth curves, twelve quarters Year-on-year growth of trailing-twelve-month revenue (left axis), profit and EPS (right axis — they swing far wider), % at each quarter-end. Where the trailing-twelve-month history is short, the curve falls back to single-quarter year-on-year growth — noisier, and the classifier smooths and caps base-effect spikes before reading. Base-effect spikes shown pinned (▲). A missing point means that reading is not held for the quarter.
the trajectory the stage is read from
RevenueProfit
102%−298.8%51%−299.4%0.0%−300.0%−49%−300.6%−100%−301.2%%%−61.5%−300%Jun 23Dec 23Sep 24Jun 25Mar 26
102%−298.8%51%−299.4%0.0%−300.0%−49%−300.6%−100%−301.2%%%−61.5%−300%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
Revenue growth
Falling
latest −61.5% · span −85.7% to +85.7%

Why it matters: with too little history, an honest page says so instead of guessing a trajectory.

The latest quarter’s profit carries a one-off item larger than the operating base, so the profit curve is shown but does not vote in the stage call.

The return-on-capital curve is not shown — net worth is negative, so a return on capital is not a meaningful number in any basis. This is a distressed balance sheet, and the stage is read from the growth curves alone.

One or more growth curves carry a base-effect spike — a large year-on-year move off a near-zero or loss-making comparable quarter. Those spikes are capped before the classifier reads the trajectory, and shown pinned on the chart, so a single distorted quarter does not drive the stage call.

Fewer than eight usable quarters on the growth curves — this page will not guess a trajectory from a stub of history.

Growth, year by year: revenue −33.6% in FY26, profit null Year-over-year growth per fiscal year, %: revenue (left axis); net profit and EPS (right axis — profit growth swings far wider). Zero line drawn. Turnaround-year spikes shown pinned (▲).
Revenue YoYProfit YoYEPS YoY
32%337%8.1%202%−16%67%−40%−69%−64%−204%%%−33.6%−166.7%FY16FY21FY26
32%337%8.1%202%−16%67%−40%−69%−64%−204%%%−33.6%−166.7%FY16FY21FY26
TTM growth by quarter Trailing-twelve-month growth versus the year-ago TTM, per quarter, %: revenue (left axis); profit and EPS (right axis). The acceleration read compares the last 4 quarters (−33.8%) with the last 8 annualized (−45.6%).
revenue accelerating
Revenue TTM YoY
28%3.3%−22%−47%−71%%−33.8%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
28%3.3%−22%−47%−71%%−33.8%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
Compound annual growth rate (%) Compound annual growth rate over each window, %. Revenue, profit and EPS from fiscal-year figures; share price is the price CAGR over the same spans. A dash = that window is not held, or the base was a loss.
1yr3yr5yr10yr
Revenue−33.6%−28.1%−23.4%−21.2%
Share price+188.1%+73.8%+34.1%+9.2%
Revenue YoY (Mar 26)
−61.5%
latest quarter vs a year ago
Revenue 10y
−21.2%
long-run compound pace

→ The stage names the trajectory. Next: the revenue line that produces it, quarter by quarter.

04 · 4-Factor Sector Score

4-Factor Sector Score

29.6/100 — rank 8 of 8 in Infra - Engineering - General · 63% evidence confidence

BGR Energy Systems Ltd scores 29.6 out of 100 against the 8 companies it is compared with in Infra - Engineering - General, ranking 8. Price leads the evidence: RS versus the benchmark is -4%, but earnings trajectory is weak. Wait for revenue and profit confirmation.

The four contributions add to the total exactly: 5.1 + 0.9 + 10 + 13.6 = 29.6. This is the SAME number shown on the sector comparison — it is computed once, for the whole peer set, and read here.

What would change it: The read weakens if profit growth turns negative or margin improvement reverses while sector-relative strength deteriorates.

05 · Revenue

Revenue Revenue is the top line: everything the company billed its customers in the period.

BGR Energy Systems Ltd reported ₹50.0 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, −61.5% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at −21.2% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹300 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹300 Cr.

BGR Energy Systems Ltd reported ₹50.0 Cr of revenue in the Mar 26 quarter, −61.5% year on year. Over 10 years it has compounded at −21.2% a year. The last full year, FY26, came in at ₹300 Cr. The last four reported quarters add to ₹300 Cr.

FY26 revenue came in at ₹300 Cr (−33.6% on the year), capping 10 years at −21.2% compound. The latest quarter (Mar 26) printed ₹50.0 Cr, −61.5% year on year.

FY26 revenue ₹300 Cr (−33.6% YoY) Revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
−21.2% a year over 10 years
RevenueYoY growth
3.7k32%2.8k8.1%1.9k−16%929−40%0−64%₹ Cr%₹300−33.6%FY16FY21FY26
3.7k32%2.8k8.1%1.9k−16%929−40%0−64%₹ Cr%₹300−33.6%FY16FY21FY26
Mar 26: ₹50.0 Cr (−61.5% YoY) Quarterly revenue bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Revenue (quarterly)YoY growth
499102%37451%2490.0%125−49%0−100%₹ Cr%₹50−61.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
499102%37451%2490.0%125−49%0−100%₹ Cr%₹50−61.5%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

Pace check: the last four quarters averaged −23.1% growth against the decade's −21.2% — the current year is running slower than its own long-run rate.

Acceleration check: trailing-twelve-month revenue grew −33.8% over the last 4 quarters against −45.6%/yr over the last 8 — accelerating.

→ Revenue slipped — did margins hold as it scaled? Next: −467.0% this quarter (−235.0 pp YoY).

06 · Operating margin

Operating margin Operating margin is what is left of every ₹100 of sales after running the business, before interest and tax. It is the cleanest read on pricing power and cost control.

BGR Energy Systems Ltd's operating margin is −467.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, −235.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −195.0% to 11.0%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.

BGR Energy Systems Ltd's operating margin is −467.0% in the Mar 26 quarter, −235.0 percentage points against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −195.0% to 11.0%. The current quarter is running below every full year in that window.

The latest quarter's operating margin is −467.0%, −235.0 pp against the same quarter a year ago. Across 13 fiscal years the operating margin has ranged −195.0%–11.0%.

🚨 Why the margin moved: operating margin went −234.7 pp year on year while gross margin went −249.5 pp — the loss came mostly from the gross line: input costs and pricing.

FY26: −195.0% Operating margin by fiscal year, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). 13-year window.
within a −195.0–11.0% band over 13 years
operating marginYoY change (pp)
27%34%−32%0.0%−92%−34%−152%−68%−211%−102%%%−195%−70%FY14FY20FY26
27%34%−32%0.0%−92%−34%−152%−68%−211%−102%%%−195%−70%FY14FY20FY26
Mar 26: −467.0% operating margin (−235.0 pp YoY) Quarterly operating margin, %, line (left); year-on-year change in the margin, in percentage points, line (right). Last 12 quarters. Operating profit as a share of revenue, per quarter.
Operating marginYoY change (pp)
140%342%−23%162%−186%−18%−349%−197%−512%−377%%%−467%−235%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
140%342%−23%162%−186%−18%−349%−197%−512%−377%%%−467%−235%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

→ Margins slipped — did that reach the bottom line? Next: profit null in the latest quarter.

07 · Net profit

Net profit Net profit is what survives every cost, interest and tax — the number EPS, dividends and book value all grow from.

BGR Energy Systems Ltd posted a net loss of ₹771 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter. That quarter carries a one-off item larger than its own revenue, so the year-on-year figure is an artefact rather than a trading result. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹1,292 Cr. That loss is 1,542.0% of the quarter's revenue.

BGR Energy Systems Ltd posted a net loss of ₹771 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter. That quarter carries a one-off item larger than its own revenue, so the year-on-year figure is an artefact rather than a trading result. The full FY26 year was a loss of ₹1,292 Cr. That loss is 1,542.0% of the quarter's revenue.

Mar 26 profit was ₹−771 Cr, null year on year. On the full year, FY26 printed ₹−1,292 Cr (null).

🚨 Read this profit with care: at ₹−771 Cr it is larger than the whole quarter's revenue of ₹50.0 Cr — no operating business earns more than it sells, so this is a one-off item (a debt-to-equity conversion, a tax write-back or an asset sale), not money the business earned. The underlying operations are running at −467.0% operating margin; the year-on-year jump and any P/E built on this number are artefacts of the one-off, not a real earnings turn.

FY26 profit ₹−1,292 Cr (null YoY) Net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). 11-year window. A bar is red when it is lower than the year before.
Net profitYoY growth
195611%−204402%−604194%−1.0k−15%−1.4k−224%₹ Cr%₹−1,292−166.7%FY16FY21FY26
195611%−204402%−604194%−1.0k−15%−1.4k−224%₹ Cr%₹−1,292−166.7%FY16FY21FY26
Mar 26: ₹−771 Cr (null YoY) Quarterly net profit bars, ₹ Cr (left); YoY growth-% line (right). Last 12 quarters. A bar is red when it is lower than the quarter before.
Net profit (quarterly)YoY growth
201−356.2%−60−356.8%−321−357.4%−582−358.0%−843−358.6%₹ Cr%₹−771−357.4%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
201−356.2%−60−356.8%−321−357.4%−582−358.0%−843−358.6%₹ Cr%₹−771−357.4%Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

→ Profit rose — but did the cash follow? Next: 780% of the last 3 years' profit arrived as cash.

08 · Cash flow — the router

Cash flow — the router The P&L says what was earned; the cash-flow statement says what actually arrived. Operating cash flow (CFO) against profit is the cleanest lie detector in the accounts.

Over the last 3 fiscal years 780% of BGR Energy Systems Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash — the cash follows the profit. In FY26 that was ₹−23.0 Cr of operating cash against ₹−1,292 Cr of profit. After ₹−16.0 Cr of capital spending, ₹−7.0 Cr was left as free cash.

FY26: operating cash of ₹−23.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−1,292 Cr, leaving free cash of ₹−7.0 Cr after ₹−16.0 Cr of capital spending. Across the last 3 fiscal years the conversion rate is 780% of profit.

Cash-flow readings here are annual — that is the resolution our series carries, so this section moves once a year.

FY26: CFO ₹−23.0 Cr vs profit ₹−1,292 Cr Operating cash flow and net profit by fiscal year, ₹ Cr; the line is free cash flow (CFO minus capital spending). 11-year window, annual resolution.
780% of 3-year profit arrived as cash
Operating cashNet profitFree cash
73741−656−1.4k−2.0k₹ Cr₹−23₹−1,292₹−7FY16FY21FY26
73741−656−1.4k−2.0k₹ Cr₹−23₹−1,292₹−7FY16FY21FY26
FY26: CFO = 1,667% of profit (three-year rate 780%) Operating cash as a share of net profit, per fiscal year, % (line). Dashed line = 100% — every unit of profit arriving as cash; outlier years shown pinned.
Conversion100%
374%104%−166%−435%−705%%300%FY16FY21FY26
374%104%−166%−435%−705%%300%FY16FY21FY26

Why conversion sits at 780%: the cash cycle tightened 169 days between FY21 and FY26 — cash that used to wait in the cycle now reaches the bank sooner.

Router verdict: no single sink dominates — the next section checks both the working-capital cycle and the capital spending.

→ So follow the cash to where it goes. Next: a −572-day cycle and ₹−29.0 Cr of building.

09 · Where the cash goes

Where the cash goes Working capital is the cash tied up between paying suppliers and getting paid: debtor days (customers owe), inventory days (stock waits), and the cash conversion cycle (the whole loop, in days of sales).

BGR Energy Systems Ltd's cash conversion cycle runs −572 days in FY26, down from −403 days in FY21. Capital spending ran ₹−29.0 Cr over the last 3 years. At FY26 sales of ₹300 Cr each day of that cycle holds about ₹0.8 Cr, so roughly ₹−470 Cr sits inside the business at any moment.

FY26: debtors at 106 days, inventory at 6 days — roughly 0.2 months of stock waiting to sell; that is where the cash sits while it waits — for a full cycle of −572 days, tighter than FY21's −403.

The full loop: cash goes out to suppliers and production on day 0; stock waits 6 days to sell; customers pay about 106 days after that; and suppliers themselves are paid at 684 days — netting out to the −572-day cycle.

In money terms: at FY26 sales of ₹300 Cr, each day of the cycle holds about ₹0.8 Cr — so the −572-day loop keeps roughly ₹−470 Cr sitting inside the business at any moment.

FY26: a −572-day cash cycle Debtor days, inventory days, payable days and the cash conversion cycle by fiscal year. 13-year window.
−169 days vs FY21
Cash cycleInventory daysDebtor daysPayable days
1,011580149−282−713days−572d6d106d684dFY14FY17FY20FY23FY26
1,011580149−282−713days−572d6d106d684dFY14FY20FY26

On the investment side: capital spending of ₹−29.0 Cr over the last 3 fiscal years against ₹37.0 Cr of depreciation — spending at or below maintenance level. Capital work-in-progress stands at ₹0.0 Cr (FY26) — capacity paid for but not yet earning.

FY26: capex ₹−16.0 Cr, work-in-progress ₹0.0 Cr Capital spending per fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); capital work-in-progress, ₹ Cr (line). Quarterly capital-spending history is not held for India — annual is the honest resolution.
steady investment
CapexWork-in-progress
1046119−24−67₹ Cr₹−16₹0FY16FY18FY21FY23FY26
1046119−24−67₹ Cr₹−16₹0FY16FY21FY26

The synthesis: neither the cycle nor the build-out is hoarding the cash — the machine is reasonably clean.

→ Does all this activity actually earn its cost of capital? Next: ROCE is −27% and the ROIC − WACC spread is −39.3 pp.

10 · Return on capital

Return on capital Return on capital employed (ROCE) is the profit the whole business earns on all the money in it — equity and debt together. It is the single best test of whether growth creates value or just size.⚠ unverified

BGR Energy Systems Ltd earns a ROCE of −27% in FY26. Return on invested capital clears the cost of that capital by −39.3 percentage points, so growth here is not yet paying for the capital it uses. The wiring behind it is −430.7% net margin on 0.07× asset turns.

FY26 ROCE is −27%.

🚨 Why the return is what it is — the wiring (FY26): −430.7% net margin × 0.07× asset turns × −1.51× balance-sheet leverage ≈ 45.5% on equity. Margin does its share; leverage is modest — this is an earned return, not a borrowed one.

The capstone test — ROIC − WACC: −27.3% − 12.0% = a −39.3 pp spread. The 12.0% is a standing assumption for the cost of capital in India, not a per-stock estimate — read the sign and the size of the spread, not the decimals. Negative — growth at these returns destroys value until the returns recover.

FY26: ROCE −27% Return on capital employed by fiscal year, % (line); ROIC by fiscal year, % (line). 13-year window, dips included. Dashed line = the 12.0% cost of capital used on this page.
the full ladder
ROCEROIC (annual)WACC
24%−20%−65%−110%−155%%−27%−142.7%FY14FY20FY26
24%−20%−65%−110%−155%%−27%−142.7%FY14FY20FY26
Q4 FY26: ROCE −33.3% (TTM) vs WACC 12.0% Trailing-twelve-month ROCE and ROIC, per quarter, %; dashed line = the cost of capital. Last 12 quarters, put on a trailing-twelve-month basis and anchored to the annual figure.
ROCE (TTM)ROIC (TTM)WACC
649%461%273%84%−104%%−33.3%−15.5%Q4 FY22Q1 FY24Q4 FY26
649%461%273%84%−104%%−33.3%−15.5%Q4 FY22Q1 FY24Q4 FY26

→ Returns like these — is the balance sheet borrowing to make them? Next: debt-to-equity is −1.59.

11 · Debt

Debt Debt-to-equity says how much of the business is funded by borrowings. Low is the safe corner; the trend matters as much as the level.⚠ unverified

BGR Energy Systems Ltd's net worth is negative — it owes more than it owns — so a debt-to-equity ratio is not meaningful here. On the annual view that ratio went from 3.50 in FY22 to −1.56 in FY26. The returns elsewhere on this page are therefore earned rather than borrowed.

Mar 26: total debt of ₹4,535 Cr against shareholder equity of ₹−2,903 Cr — a debt-to-equity of −1.56. On the annual view, debt-to-equity went from 3.50 (FY22) to −1.56 (FY26). The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed.

FY26: debt ₹4,535 Cr at −1.56× equity Total debt by fiscal year, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). 5-year window.
Total debtDebt-to-equity
4.9k40.9×3.7k29.2×2.4k17.5×1.2k5.9×0−5.8×₹ Cr×₹4,535−1.56×FY22FY24FY26
4.9k40.9×3.7k29.2×2.4k17.5×1.2k5.9×0−5.8×₹ Cr×₹4,535−1.56×FY22FY24FY26
Mar 26: debt ₹4,535 Cr, debt-to-equity −1.56 Total debt per quarter, ₹ Cr (bars); debt-to-equity, × (line). Last 12 quarters. India reports the full balance sheet half-yearly, so the intervening quarter carries the prior reading forward.
Total debt (quarterly)Debt-to-equity
4.9k41.7×3.7k26.9×2.4k12.2×1.2k−2.6×0−17.4×₹ Cr×₹4,535−1.56×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26
4.9k41.7×3.7k26.9×2.4k12.2×1.2k−2.6×0−17.4×₹ Cr×₹4,535−1.56×Jun 23Sep 24Mar 26

→ Who owns this, and are they adding or leaving? Next: the register is quiet.

12 · Ownership

Ownership Who owns the stock, quarter by quarter: promoters (the controlling owners), foreign and domestic institutions, and the public. Steady accumulation by people close to the numbers is a signal; a quiet register is also an answer.

No holder of BGR Energy Systems Ltd moved a full percentage point over the last two years — the register is quiet. Foreign institutions moved −0.2 points over the same window, to 0.0%. The register is read on the four disclosed classes only; nothing is inferred between filings.

The register over the last two years — Domestic institutions: −0.3 points over 8 quarters to 0.0%; Foreign institutions: −0.2 points over 8 quarters to 0.0%; Promoters: +0.0 points over 8 quarters to 51.0%.

Fiscal-year ends: promoters +0.0 pts from Mar 24 to Mar 26 Shareholding at each fiscal-year end (March quarter), % of the company. 3 year-ends held.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
55%40%26%11%−4.1%%51.0%0.1%0%48.9%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
55%40%26%11%−4.1%%51.0%0.1%0%48.9%Mar 24Mar 25Mar 26
A quiet register: no holder moved a full point in two years Shareholding by holder class, % of the company, quarterly, last 13 quarters.
PromotersForeign inst.Domestic inst.Public
81%59%38%16%−6.0%%51.0%0.0%0%49.0%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26
81%59%38%16%−6.0%%51.0%0.0%0%49.0%Jun 23Dec 24Jun 26

→ One last check: does the safety math agree? Next: the balance-sheet safety line.

13 · Safety line

Safety line The Z-score estimates how far a company sits from balance-sheet distress — above roughly 3 is safe, below roughly 1.8 is the danger zone. It was built for manufacturers, so it is not applied to banks and lenders.

BGR Energy Systems Ltd: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one. It is a distance-to-distress estimate from the balance sheet, not a forecast of failure. The debt, cash-flow and return sections above carry the balance-sheet evidence this page does hold, and each of them states its own reporting date.

The safety line in one sentence: the Z-score is not available for this stock, so we say so rather than invent one.

Related companies · same sector · Infra - Engineering - General Every company is compared on the shape of its own curves, not static ratios. The Revenue, EPS and ROCE columns each draw that company's last 12 quarters as a mini line of the ACTUAL level (trailing-twelve-month revenue and EPS, and the ROCE itself) — so a line that climbs is a business getting bigger, a line that sinks is one shrinking. The colour tracks the same line: green when it is rising or steadily healthy, amber when it is rolling over from a high (still elevated but turning down), red when it is falling, grey when flat or stuck. Colour and direction always agree — a green line never points down. The ROCE curve is the return on capital (annual readings for peers, so a slightly coarser line than the quarterly one at the top of this page). The Stage column then runs the same 12-quarter trajectory classifier used at the top of the page on each company and names where it sits. What lands a company in each bucket: CONSISTENT — growth stays positive across the window and returns are healthy (ROCE ≥ 15%, or ROE ≥ 12% for lenders); IMPROVING — profit or EPS fell into real decline, bottomed a few quarters back, and has climbed back to positive and held there; TURNING AROUND — the same kind of trough but more recent, with the latest quarters just lifting off it (an early, unconfirmed turn); TOPPING OUT — growth is still positive but decelerating hard from its own peak while returns have stopped rising; DETERIORATING — two or more growth curves are shrinking (latest below zero) and staying there, not one soft quarter; MIXED — the curves genuinely disagree, or no clean majority, so no single word fits; NO READ — fewer than eight usable quarters. It is a like-for-like read of every company against its own past, not a ranking against the group.
CompanyP/EMkt capRevenueEPSROCEStage
BGR Energy Systems Ltd this page9.1×₹2,101 CrNo read
Engineers India Ltd18.3×₹12,658 CrMixed
Ircon International Ltd19.9×₹11,857 CrTurning around
ISGEC Heavy Engineering Ltd54.8×₹6,291 CrMixed
Bondada Engineering Ltd16.8×₹3,421 Cr
Bondada Engineering Ltd16.8×₹3,269 Cr
EMS Ltd24.7×₹2,240 CrDeteriorating
Axtel Industries Ltd29.9×₹739 CrTurning around
Artson Ltd₹529 CrNo read
12 · Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is BGR Energy Systems Ltd's share price today?

BGR Energy Systems Ltd trades at ₹294, +188.1% over the past year. The company is valued at ₹2,101 Cr. The stock sits at 55% of its 52-week range of ₹112–₹444, +0.0% versus its 200-day average. On the tape, the price is in a confirmed uptrend, 81 weeks in. — as of 24 July 2026.

What were BGR Energy Systems Ltd's latest quarterly results?

BGR Energy Systems Ltd reported revenue of ₹50.0 Cr and a net loss of ₹771 Cr for the Mar 26 quarter. Earnings per share were ₹−106.42. The operating margin was −467.0%, 235.0 pp lower than a year earlier. — as of 24 July 2026.

What is BGR Energy Systems Ltd's revenue?

BGR Energy Systems Ltd reported revenue of ₹50.0 Cr in the Mar 26 quarter, −61.5% year on year. For the full FY26 fiscal year, revenue was ₹300 Cr (−33.6%). Over the last 10 years revenue compounded at −21.2% a year. — as of 24 July 2026.

What is BGR Energy Systems Ltd's profit?

BGR Energy Systems Ltd earned ₹−771 Cr of net profit in the Mar 26 quarter. Full-year FY26 profit was ₹−1,292 Cr. The operating margin ran −467.0% in the latest quarter. — as of 24 July 2026.

What is BGR Energy Systems Ltd's market cap?

BGR Energy Systems Ltd's market capitalisation is ₹2,101 Cr at a share price of ₹294. Market cap is the share price multiplied by shares outstanding, so it is restated whenever the price moves. — as of 24 July 2026.

What is BGR Energy Systems Ltd's P/E ratio?

BGR Energy Systems Ltd trades at a P/E of 9.1×, at the 16th percentile of its own 4-year range, against a long-run median of 18.9×. This is a comparison with the stock's own history, not a value call — as of 24 July 2026.

Does BGR Energy Systems Ltd pay a dividend?

Not in its latest year — BGR Energy Systems Ltd's dividend payout was 0% of profit in FY26. It did record a payout in 1 of its last 13 reported fiscal years, so there is a history but no current dividend. — as of 24 July 2026.

Is BGR Energy Systems Ltd overvalued?

On its own history, BGR Energy Systems Ltd looks cheap against its own history: its P/E of 9.1× has been cheaper only 16% of the time in 4 years (long-run median 18.9×). That is a percentile read against the stock's own past, not a price opinion or a direction call. — as of 24 July 2026.

How is BGR Energy Systems Ltd performing?

BGR Energy Systems Ltd is in a confirmed uptrend, 81 weeks in. Against the NIFTY 500 it has been behind on a trailing-13-week view for 1 week. This describes what the data did, not a rating. — as of 24 July 2026.

Is BGR Energy Systems Ltd in an uptrend?

Yes — the price is in a confirmed uptrend (week 81 of stage 2), trading +0.0% versus its 200-day average and at 55% of its 52-week range. Price stages cycle base → advance → top → decline, and the stage names where this stock sits in that cycle — as of 24 July 2026.

Is BGR Energy Systems Ltd beating the market?

Not lately — on a trailing-13-week view BGR Energy Systems Ltd is currently behind the NIFTY 500 (1 week and counting; last ahead the week of 2026-07-10), the same metric the week-by-week ribbon on this page draws. Separately, on the cumulative view: over the last 10.3 years the stock moved +186% against the NIFTY 500's +274% — behind the index over the full window. — as of 24 July 2026.

Will BGR Energy Systems Ltd's share price go up?

This page publishes no price forecast for BGR Energy Systems Ltd. What it measures instead: the share price is ₹294, the price is in a confirmed uptrend 81 weeks in. Its P/E of 9.1× sits at the 16th percentile of its own 4-year range. — as of 24 July 2026.

Who owns BGR Energy Systems Ltd?

Promoters hold 51.0% of BGR Energy Systems Ltd, foreign institutions 0.0%, domestic institutions 0.0% and the public 49.0% (latest quarter). No holder moved a full point over the last two years — the register is quiet. — as of 24 July 2026.

Does BGR Energy Systems Ltd have too much debt?

No — BGR Energy Systems Ltd's debt-to-equity is −1.59, and operating profit covers the interest bill −1×. FY26 borrowings were ₹4,535 Cr against equity of ₹−2,861 Cr. The returns on this page are earned, not borrowed — as of 24 July 2026.

What is BGR Energy Systems Ltd's capex?

BGR Energy Systems Ltd spent ₹−29.0 Cr on capital expenditure over the last 3 fiscal years, a figure derived from the change in fixed assets plus depreciation. In FY26 alone that was ₹−16.0 Cr, with ₹0.0 Cr in capital work-in-progress — capacity paid for but not yet earning. — as of 24 July 2026.

What is BGR Energy Systems Ltd's cash flow?

BGR Energy Systems Ltd generated ₹−23.0 Cr of operating cash flow in FY26 and ₹−7.0 Cr of free cash flow after ₹−16.0 Cr of capital spending. Reported profit that year was ₹−1,292 Cr, so operating cash ran ahead of profit. Cash-flow resolution for India is annual. — as of 24 July 2026.

Is BGR Energy Systems Ltd's profit real cash?

Yes — over the last 3 fiscal years, 780% of BGR Energy Systems Ltd's reported profit arrived as operating cash. In FY26, operating cash was ₹−23.0 Cr against reported profit of ₹−1,292 Cr. The cash then goes into a mix of the working-capital cycle and capacity. Cash-flow resolution is annual — as of 24 July 2026.

Where is BGR Energy Systems Ltd in its business cycle?

BGR Energy Systems Ltd's FY26 operating margin was −195.0%, against a 13-year band of −195.0%–11.0%: the low end of its own band, which is where recoveries start when they come. The latest quarter ran −467.0%. Profitability versus a company's own long band is the cleanest cycle clock this page holds — as of 24 July 2026.

What could break the BGR Energy Systems Ltd story?

The sharpest disagreement: the P/E sits at the 16th percentile of its own range, but the engine is deteriorating — cheap for a reason until the quarters turn. Mechanically, two Friday closes in a row below the 200-day average would end the price trend — that is the exit rule this page tracks — as of 24 July 2026.

Is BGR Energy Systems Ltd a stock worth studying right now?

This is not investment advice. The machine read: BGR Energy Systems Ltd's balance sheet is under water — net worth is negative, so it owes more than it owns. The latest quarter's headline profit is a one-off item (larger than a full quarter's revenue), not money the business earned. This is a distressed, high-risk situation — the equity can be wiped by dilution or restructuring before operations recover. Not a value setup. The sharpest open question: whether the business can earn its way back to positive equity before dilution or restructuring gets there first. Every number on this page is drawn deterministically from the raw series, with no forecasts and no price opinions — as of 24 July 2026.

Chat with this pageChat with pageChatChatGPTClaudePerplexityGoogle AI