# Yum China Holdings share price today (Yum China Holdings, Inc., YUMC) > Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s share price, valuation and earnings point in different directions. The next one or two quarters should make it clearer. YUMC · Consumer Discretionary · Restaurants · data as of 4 November 2026. Page: https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/yumc Sector Alpha also publishes a daily newsletter that explains one Indian stock at a time: https://newsletter.sectoralpha.in/?utm_source=sectoralpha&utm_medium=ai_text&utm_campaign=llms ## Key numbers - Business trend: Growing steadily, from the last 12 quarters - Price: $49.68 (+14.0% in a year) - P/E: 17.4× (lower than 85% of the last 4.6 years) - Revenue (Jun 2026): $3.1 B (+12.6% on a year ago) - Profit (Jun 2026): $244 M (+13.5% on a year ago) - Operating margin: 11.5% (+0.2 points on a year ago) - ROE: 15%, FY25 - ROIC: 14.5%, against a 3.8% cost of capital: +10.7 points Biggest thing to watch: margins are the best this company has ever reported. Every ratio looks better at a record, so the story depends on margins staying high. ## What is the Yum China Holdings share price today? Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s share price was $49.68 at the close on 4 November 2026. It has been stalling near its high for 1 week. That is 6.1% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $40 and $58, and at that close it sat 54% of the way up from that low. Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the S&P 500, and it has stayed ahead for 1 week in a row. Over the last 10 years the share price moved +99% while the S&P 500 moved +258%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week. This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row. ## What dividend does Yum China Holdings pay? Yum China Holdings, Inc. paid $1.06 per share over the last four reported quarters. The most recent declaration was $0.29 for Jun 2026. At today's price of $49.68 that is a yield of 2.13%, based on dividends already paid, not a forecast. ## Which stock lists is Yum China Holdings on? Yum China Holdings is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list. ## Is Yum China Holdings profitable? Yum China Holdings, Inc. earned $244 M of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +13.5% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 3rd quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $929 M. Over 4 years profit has grown −1.6% a year on average. That is 7.8% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $215 M. For the full year, FY25 profit was $929 M (+2.0% on the year before). Why profit moved: revenue changed +12.6% on a year earlier and the margin moved +0.2 percentage points. Sales did the work, and the margin was about flat. On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +9.0% and revenue +8.9%. Profit and revenue are moving at about the same pace. ## How much revenue does Yum China Holdings make, and is it growing? Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported $3.1 B of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +12.6% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 12th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 4 years it has grown 4.6% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at $11.8 B. The last four reported quarters add to $12.4 B. FY25 revenue was $11.8 B, +4.4% on the year before. Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +8.9% on average, against 4.6% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate. Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +8.8%, against +6.1% a year over the last 8 quarters (stabilising); profit over the last 12 months grew +6.1%, against +7.7% a year (stabilising). ## How much of every $100 of sales does Yum China Holdings keep? Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s operating margin was 11.5% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 0.2 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Its latest full-year margin is the highest it has ever reported. Across 5 years it has been between 6.9% and 11.2%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period. Across 5 years it has been between 6.9% and 11.2%, and FY25's 11.2% is the highest of them. Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +0.2 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +0.0 points. So the gain came mostly from costs below the gross margin, such as staff and overheads, measured against sales. As noted under valuation: when margins are at a record, every ratio built on profit looks better than usual, so a low multiple can mislead. ## Is Yum China Holdings' profit turning into cash? Over the last 3 years, 163% of Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in $1.5 B of operating cash against $929 M of profit. After $626 M of spending on assets, $840 M was left over as free cash. Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year. Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason. What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building. ## Where does Yum China Holdings' cash go? Yum China Holdings, Inc. does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $2.0 B on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 5.8% of FY25 revenue a year. Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn. Spending on assets: $2.0 B over the last 3 years. In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns. ## What is Yum China Holdings' P/E ratio, and how does it compare with its own history? Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s P/E is 17.4×, near the low end of its own history: it has been lower only 15% of the time. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 20.5×, over 4.6 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth. Keep one thing in mind: margins are the best this company has ever reported. A multiple that looks low against its own past can mislead when profit is at a record. If margins fall back, today's multiple is higher than it looks. Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +7.7% while the price moved +14.0%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range. Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved +3.1% a year; about +13.7% a year came from earnings growth and about −10.6 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying less). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple. In short: the multiple is low against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple. ## Is the Yum China Holdings business getting better or worse? Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s business is growing steadily. Revenue, profit and EPS growth have stayed positive throughout, and ROCE is steady at 16.4%. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures. Why it matters: steady growth with healthy returns is how a business compounds over time. ## How much does Yum China Holdings earn on its capital? Yum China Holdings, Inc. earned a ROE of 15% in FY25. That is up from a low of 6% in FY22. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 10.7 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 7.9% net margin and 1.09× asset turnover (sales divided by assets). Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 7.9% net margin × 1.09× asset turnover × 1.77× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 15.2% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it. The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 14.5% − 3.8% = +10.7 percentage points. The 3.8% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. A gap this wide means each dollar put back into the business creates more than a dollar of value. ## Does Yum China Holdings have too much debt? Yum China Holdings, Inc. has total debt of $2.3 B against shareholder equity of $6.1 B as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.38× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.36 in FY21 to 0.38 in FY25. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page. ## What is the Yum China Holdings shareholding pattern? 1.8% of Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s tradable shares are in short positions, which are bets that the price will fall, so very few traders are betting against this stock. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 3.8 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead. It is a single reading at one point in time; we do not have its history. Why it is at this level: the figure does not say who holds the short positions or why, so we show the level without guessing the story. ## How far is Yum China Holdings from balance-sheet trouble? For Yum China Holdings, Inc., the Z-score is 3.04. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is well clear of danger. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. Why it matters: a Z-score of 3.04 is well clear of the danger zone, so the balance sheet is not the risk here. ## How does Yum China Holdings rank in its industry? 58.0 out of 100, rank 6 of 29 in Restaurants, with 81% of the evidence available. Yum China Holdings, Inc. scores 58.0 out of 100 against the 29 companies it is compared with in Restaurants, ranking 6. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. The four parts add up to the total exactly: 21.4 + 16.3 + 12.9 + 7.4 = 58. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here. What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector. ## Which companies is Yum China Holdings compared with? Yum China Holdings ranks 6 of 29 Restaurants companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 58.0 out of 100. 1. [Yum! Brands, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/yum) YUM · turning · Most evidence points up · 81% evidence 70.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 24.1/35 · Revenue 10.3% · Profit 54.8% · Operating margin change -0.8 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 21.3/25 · ROCE 64.6% · Operating margin 32.8% · 76% evidence Valuation 14.8/20 · P/E 19.9× · PEG 0.35 · 65% evidence Relative strength 10.6/20 · Lead over its industry -4.6% · Lead over S&P 500 1.2% · 1 year 11.5% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 24.1 + 21.3 + 14.8 + 10.6 = 70.8 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 2. [Brinker International, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/eat) EAT · quiet · Most evidence points up · 81% evidence 69.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 23.3/35 · Revenue 7.9% · Profit 27.1% · Operating margin change 0.9 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 18.3/25 · ROCE 29.3% · Operating margin 11.3% · 76% evidence Valuation 15.0/20 · P/E 15× · PEG 0.48 · 65% evidence Relative strength 13.0/20 · Lead over its industry 15% · Lead over S&P 500 22.3% · 1 year 114.8% · 100% evidence · 8 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 23.3 + 18.3 + 15 + 13 = 69.6 · What this means: Earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength all agree. The open questions are about management, upcoming events and risks. 3. [Wingstop Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/wing) WING · turning · Evidence leans up · 71% evidence 60.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 22.7/35 · Revenue 7.9% · Profit -32.6% · Operating margin change 3 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 21.0/25 · ROCE 35.3% · Operating margin 29.8% · 76% evidence Valuation 9.5/20 · P/E 39× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 7.5/20 · Lead over its industry -18.2% · Lead over S&P 500 -14.2% · 1 year -29.6% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 22.7 + 21 + 9.5 + 7.5 = 60.7 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 4. [Restaurant Brands International Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/qsr) QSR · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 60.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 22.6/35 · Revenue 6.5% · Profit 41.5% · Operating margin change 0.9 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 15.3/25 · ROCE 11.5% · Operating margin 27.7% · 76% evidence Valuation 14.5/20 · P/E 19.8× · PEG 0.49 · 65% evidence Relative strength 7.6/20 · Lead over its industry -6% · Lead over S&P 500 -0.1% · 1 year 15.7% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 22.6 + 15.3 + 14.5 + 7.6 = 60 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 5. [The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cake) CAKE · leader · Evidence leans up · 66% evidence 59.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 19.8/35 · Revenue n/a · Profit n/a · Operating margin change 2 points · 39% evidence Capital efficiency 11.0/25 · ROCE 9.4% · Operating margin 7.8% · 76% evidence Valuation 14.7/20 · P/E 22.1× · PEG 0.31 · 65% evidence Relative strength 13.5/20 · Lead over its industry 36.3% · Lead over S&P 500 45.7% · 1 year 143.2% · 100% evidence · 12 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 19.8 + 11 + 14.7 + 13.5 = 59 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 6. Yum China Holdings, Inc. this page YUMC · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 58.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 21.4/35 · Revenue 8.8% · Profit 6.1% · Operating margin change 0.2 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 16.3/25 · ROCE 16.8% · Operating margin 11.5% · 76% evidence Valuation 12.9/20 · P/E 14.4× · PEG 1.12 · 65% evidence Relative strength 7.4/20 · Lead over its industry -6.9% · Lead over S&P 500 -1.4% · 1 year 14% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 21.4 + 16.3 + 12.9 + 7.4 = 58 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 7. [Darden Restaurants, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/dri) DRI · turning · Evidence leans up · 85% evidence 57.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 21.0/35 · Revenue 8.1% · Profit 7.5% · Operating margin change 0.1 points · 95% evidence Capital efficiency 15.3/25 · ROCE 16% · Operating margin 9.9% · 76% evidence Valuation 8.6/20 · P/E 20.7× · PEG 2.15 · 65% evidence Relative strength 12.5/20 · Lead over its industry 0.3% · Lead over S&P 500 6.6% · 1 year 29.5% · 100% evidence · 6 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 21 + 15.3 + 8.6 + 12.5 = 57.4 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 8. [Arcos Dorados Holdings Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/arco) ARCO · quiet · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 55.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 24.6/35 · Revenue 10.8% · Profit 96.9% · Operating margin change 0.1 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 13.3/25 · ROCE 13.2% · Operating margin 5.6% · 76% evidence Valuation 16.3/20 · P/E 6.6× · PEG 0.17 · 65% evidence Relative strength 1.5/20 · Lead over its industry -22.2% · Lead over S&P 500 -17.3% · 1 year 0.4% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 24.6 + 13.3 + 16.3 + 1.5 = 55.7 · What this means: Earnings are strong; relative strength in its sector is -22.2% and the one-year return is 0.4%. 9. [El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/loco) LOCO · turning · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 58% evidence 54.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 18.8/35 · Revenue n/a · Profit n/a · Operating margin change 0.1 points · 45% evidence Capital efficiency 12.0/25 · ROCE 9% · Operating margin 9.9% · 76% evidence Valuation 10.9/20 · P/E 15× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 13.0/20 · Lead over its industry 7% · Lead over S&P 500 14.1% · 1 year 57.6% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 18.8 + 12 + 10.9 + 13 = 54.7 · What this means: Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose. 10. [Starbucks Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/sbux) SBUX · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 54.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 21.2/35 · Revenue 4.5% · Profit -24.7% · Operating margin change 3.4 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 18.6/25 · ROCE 21.6% · Operating margin 12.9% · 76% evidence Valuation 3.9/20 · P/E 60.1× · PEG 5.07 · 65% evidence Relative strength 10.3/20 · Lead over its industry -0.7% · Lead over S&P 500 5.6% · 1 year 28.2% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 21.2 + 18.6 + 3.9 + 10.3 = 54 · What this means: A strong business with a high valuation: it would need rising earnings, or a lower multiple, to score better on value. 11. [Texas Roadhouse, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/txrh) TXRH · quiet · Evidence leans up · 66% evidence 51.5 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 12. [Cannae Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cnne) CNNE · breaking out · Evidence leans up · 64% evidence 50.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 13. [Bloomin' Brands, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/blmn) BLMN · turning · Evidence leans up · 71% evidence 50.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 14. [First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/fwrg) FWRG · turning · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 48.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 15. [Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cmg) CMG · turning · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 47.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 16. [McDonald's Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/mcd) MCD · turning · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 47.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 17. [BJ's Restaurants, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/bjri) BJRI · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 56% evidence 46.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 18. [Dine Brands Global, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/din) DIN · turning · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 45.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 19. [Sweetgreen, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/sg) SG · breaking out · Evidence leans down · 64% evidence 45.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 20. [Super Hi International Holding Ltd.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hdl) HDL · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 51% evidence 43.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 21. [Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cbrl) CBRL · breaking out · Evidence leans down · 85% evidence 39.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 22. [The Wendy's Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/wen) WEN · turning · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 38.5 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 23. [Dutch Bros Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/bros) BROS · basing · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 38.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 24. [Biglari Holdings Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/bh) BH · basing · Evidence leans down · 71% evidence 36.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 25. [CAVA Group, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cava) CAVA · turning · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 56% evidence 36.5 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 26. [Shake Shack Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/shak) SHAK · losing its lead · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 58% evidence 36.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 27. [Domino's Pizza, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/dpz) DPZ · quiet · Most evidence points down · 85% evidence 33.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 28. [Black Rock Coffee Bar, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/brcb) BRCB · turning · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 51% evidence 33.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative 29. [Papa John's International, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/pzza) PZZA · basing · Most evidence points down · 81% evidence 32.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read. The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section. Related companies: [Restaurants](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/restaurants), all 29 compared on one page. ## Which companies are close to Yum China Holdings in size? Yum China Holdings is the 7th largest of 36 Restaurants companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 4 November 2026). Just above it: Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., Restaurant Brands International Inc. and Darden Restaurants, Inc. Just below it: Texas Roadhouse, Inc., Domino's Pizza, Inc. and Brinker International, Inc. ### Restaurants companies close in size 1. [Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cmg) $44.5 billion 2. [Restaurant Brands International Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/qsr) $35.4 billion 3. [Darden Restaurants, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/dri) $26.1 billion 4. Yum China Holdings, Inc. $16.9 billion 5. [Texas Roadhouse, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/txrh) $12.9 billion 6. [Domino's Pizza, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/dpz) $11.2 billion 7. [Brinker International, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/eat) $9.2 billion [All 36 Restaurants companies, largest first](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/restaurants#all-companies) ### Companies close in size in other industries 1. [Ascendis Pharma A/S](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/asnd) $16.9 billion · Biotechnology 2. [Wayfair Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/w) $16.9 billion · Internet Retail 3. Yum China Holdings, Inc. $16.9 billion 4. [CF Industries Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cf) $16.9 billion · Agricultural Inputs 5. [Tower Semiconductor Ltd.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/tsem) $16.9 billion · Semiconductors ## What else do people ask about Yum China Holdings? ### What were Yum China Holdings's latest quarterly results? Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported revenue of $3.1 B and net profit of $244 M for the Jun 2026 quarter. Revenue rose 12.6% and profit rose 13.5% compared with a year earlier. Earnings per share were $0.70. The operating margin was 11.5%, 0.2 percentage points higher than a year earlier (as of 4 November 2026). ### What is Yum China Holdings's market cap? Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $16.9 B at a stock price of $49.68. Market cap is the share price times the number of shares, so it changes whenever the price moves (as of 4 November 2026). ### How is Yum China Holdings performing? Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s share price has been stalling near its high for 1 weeks. In its latest quarter, revenue rose 12.6% and profit rose 13.5% compared with a year earlier. Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the S&P 500, for 1 week running (as of 4 November 2026). ### Will Yum China Holdings's stock price go up? This page does not forecast Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s stock price. What it shows instead: the stock price is $49.68, and it has been stalling near its high for 1 weeks. Its P/E of 17.4× is higher than 15% of its own last 5 years (as of 4 November 2026). ### Does Yum China Holdings have too much debt? Yum China Holdings, Inc. has a moderate amount of debt: its debt is 0.54× its equity. A year-by-year history of its borrowings is not in our data, so this uses the latest reading. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page (as of 4 November 2026). ### Where is Yum China Holdings in its business cycle? Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 11.2%, against a 5-year range of 6.9% to 11.2%: the top of its range, a record year. When profit is at a record, every ratio looks better than usual, and the story depends on margins staying high. The latest quarter was 11.5%. Comparing margins with a company's own long history is a good way to see where it is in its cycle (as of 4 November 2026). ### What could break the Yum China Holdings story? Biggest thing to watch: margins are the best this company has ever reported. Every ratio looks better at a record, so the story depends on margins staying high. On price, this page treats a rise as over when the share price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row (as of 4 November 2026). ### Is Yum China Holdings a stock worth studying right now? What the numbers show: Yum China Holdings, Inc.'s share price, valuation and earnings point in different directions. The next one or two quarters should make it clearer. The main open question: the next one or two quarters of results. Every number on this page is worked out by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions (as of 4 November 2026). This is research, not advice. We’re not SEBI-registered.