# Woodward share price today (Woodward, Inc., WWD)

> Woodward, Inc. is reporting record margins. WWD · Industrials · Aerospace & Defense · data as of 3 November 2026. Page: https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/wwd

Sector Alpha also publishes a daily newsletter that explains one Indian stock at a time: https://newsletter.sectoralpha.in/?utm_source=sectoralpha&utm_medium=ai_text&utm_campaign=llms

## Key numbers

- Business trend: Growing steadily, from the last 12 quarters
- Price: $332.69 (+26.9% in a year)
- P/E: 37.0× (higher than 58% of the last 4.6 years)
- Revenue (Jun 2026): $1.1 B (+21.2% on a year ago)
- Profit (Jun 2026): $147 M (+35.2% on a year ago)
- Operating margin: 17.8% (+4.7 points on a year ago)
- ROE: 17%, FY25
- ROIC: 16.6%, against a 8.5% cost of capital: +8.1 points

Biggest thing to watch: margins are the best this company has ever reported. Every ratio looks better at a record, so the story depends on margins staying high. ## What is the Woodward share price today? Woodward, Inc.'s share price was $332.69 at the close on 3 November 2026. It has been moving sideways for 12 weeks. That is 8.7% below its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $260 and $432, and at that close it sat 42% of the way up from that low. Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the S&P 500, and it has been behind for 12 weeks running. Over the last 10 years the share price moved +466% while the S&P 500 moved +255%, so it is ahead of the index over that whole period. It was last ahead over 13 weeks in the week of 14 August 2026. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week. This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row. ## What dividend does Woodward pay? Woodward, Inc. paid $1.20 per share over the last four reported quarters. The most recent declaration was $0.32 for Jun 2026. At today's price of $332.69 that is a yield of 0.36%, based on dividends already paid, not a forecast. ## Which stock lists is Woodward on? Woodward is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list. ## Is Woodward profitable? Woodward, Inc. earned $147 M of net profit in the Jun 2026 quarter, +35.2% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 6th quarter in a row of profit growth. Full-year FY25 profit was $442 M. Over 4 years profit has grown 20.7% a year on average. That is 13.2% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $108 M. For the full year, FY25 profit was $442 M (+18.5% on the year before). Why profit moved: revenue changed +21.2% on a year earlier and the margin moved +4.7 percentage points. Most of the change came from keeping more of each sale. On average over the last four quarters, profit changed +44.2% and revenue +22.5%. Profit is growing faster than sales: fixed costs are spread over more sales, so each extra dollar of revenue adds more to profit. ## How much revenue does Woodward make, and is it growing? Woodward, Inc. reported $1.1 B of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +21.2% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 6th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 4 years it has grown 12.3% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at $3.6 B. The last four reported quarters add to $4.2 B. FY25 revenue was $3.6 B, +7.3% on the year before. Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +22.5% on average, against 12.3% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing faster than its own long-run rate. Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +22.3%, against +13.6% a year over the last 8 quarters (accelerating); profit over the last 12 months grew +42.4%, against +21.8% a year (accelerating). ## How much of every $100 of sales does Woodward keep? Woodward, Inc.'s operating margin was 17.8% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 4.7 percentage points higher than the same quarter a year ago. Its latest full-year margin is the highest it has ever reported. Across 5 years it has been between 8.7% and 13.9%. The latest quarter is above every full year in that period. Across 5 years it has been between 8.7% and 13.9%, and FY25's 13.9% is the highest of them. Why the margin moved: operating margin changed +4.7 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +4.3 points. So the gain came mostly from the gross margin, which means input costs and prices charged. When margins are at a record, every ratio built on profit looks better than usual, so watch whether they hold. ## Is Woodward's profit turning into cash? Over the last 3 years, 116% of Woodward, Inc.'s reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in $471 M of operating cash against $442 M of profit. After $131 M of spending on assets, $340 M was left over as free cash. Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year. Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason. What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building. ## Where does Woodward's cash go? Woodward, Inc. does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $304 M on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 2.8% of FY25 revenue a year. Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn. Spending on assets: $304 M over the last 3 years. In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns. ## What is Woodward's P/E ratio, and how does it compare with its own history? Woodward, Inc.'s P/E is 37.0×, in the middle of its own history: higher than 58% of past readings. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 35.9×, over 4.6 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth. Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved +19.6% while the price moved +26.9%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range. Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved +36.3% a year; about +33.5% a year came from earnings growth and about +2.8 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying more). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple. In short: the multiple is about average against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple. ## Is the Woodward business getting better or worse? Woodward, Inc.'s business is growing steadily. Revenue, profit and EPS growth have stayed positive throughout, and ROCE is steady at 18.3%. This is based on 12 quarters of 4 measures. Why it matters: steady growth with healthy returns is how a business compounds over time. ## How much does Woodward earn on its capital? Woodward, Inc. earned a ROE of 17% in FY25. That is up from a low of 9% in FY22. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 8.1 percentage points above its cost of capital, so growth here adds value, not just size. It comes from a 12.4% net margin and 0.77× asset turnover (sales divided by assets). Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 12.4% net margin × 0.77× asset turnover × 1.80× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 17.2% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it. The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 16.6% − 8.5% = +8.1 percentage points. The 8.5% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. A gap this wide means each dollar put back into the business creates more than a dollar of value. The 16.6% ROIC above is the latest reading, as reported. The yearly chart below shows FY25 at 14.5%, and the quarterly chart works out each 12-month window from the quarterly figures, so the readings differ by date, not by method. ## Does Woodward have too much debt? Woodward, Inc. has total debt of $1.4 B against shareholder equity of $2.5 B as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.56× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.36 in FY21 to 0.29 in FY25. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page. ## What is the Woodward shareholding pattern? 2.1% of Woodward, Inc.'s tradable shares are in short positions, which are bets that the price will fall, so some traders are betting against it. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 1.6 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead. It is a single reading at one point in time; we do not have its history. Why it is at this level: the figure does not say who holds the short positions or why, so we show the level without guessing the story. ## How far is Woodward from balance-sheet trouble? For Woodward, Inc., the Z-score is 6.66. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is well clear of danger. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. Why it matters: a Z-score of 6.66 is well clear of the danger zone, so the balance sheet is not the risk here. ## How does Woodward rank in its industry? 67.8 out of 100, rank 2 of 30 in Aerospace & Defense, with 81% of the evidence available. Woodward, Inc. scores 67.8 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Aerospace & Defense, ranking 2. The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. The four parts add up to the total exactly: 27.9 + 18.1 + 12.9 + 8.9 = 67.8. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here. What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector. ## Which companies is Woodward compared with? Woodward ranks 2 of 30 Aerospace & Defense companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 67.8 out of 100. 1. [Lockheed Martin Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/lmt) LMT · turning · Most evidence points up · 85% evidence 76.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 21.9/35 · Revenue 7.9% · Profit 55.1% · Operating margin change -0.3 points · 95% evidence Capital efficiency 18.7/25 · ROCE 21.5% · Operating margin 11.4% · 76% evidence Valuation 16.0/20 · P/E 18.4× · PEG 0.32 · 65% evidence Relative strength 20.0/20 · Lead over its industry 21.2% · Lead over S&P 500 9.2% · 1 year 39.4% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 21.9 + 18.7 + 16 + 20 = 76.6 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 2. Woodward, Inc. this page WWD · quiet · Most evidence points up · 81% evidence 67.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 27.9/35 · Revenue 22.4% · Profit 42.9% · Operating margin change 4.7 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 18.1/25 · ROCE 18.1% · Operating margin 17.8% · 76% evidence Valuation 12.9/20 · P/E 45.9× · PEG 1.09 · 65% evidence Relative strength 8.9/20 · Lead over its industry 0.2% · Lead over S&P 500 -9.6% · 1 year 24.9% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 27.9 + 18.1 + 12.9 + 8.9 = 67.8 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 3. [HEICO Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hei) HEI · basing · Most evidence points up · 85% evidence 67.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 24.4/35 · Revenue 20.7% · Profit 31.9% · Operating margin change 2 points · 95% evidence Capital efficiency 16.4/25 · ROCE 14% · Operating margin 25.1% · 76% evidence Valuation 10.1/20 · P/E 48.9× · PEG 1.56 · 65% evidence Relative strength 16.3/20 · Lead over its industry 11% · Lead over S&P 500 0.5% · 1 year 4.6% · 100% evidence · 1 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 24.4 + 16.4 + 10.1 + 16.3 = 67.2 · What this means: Earnings, capital efficiency and relative strength all agree. The open questions are about management, upcoming events and risks. 4. [RTX Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/rtx) RTX · quiet · Evidence leans up · 85% evidence 63.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 22.8/35 · Revenue 11.6% · Profit 27.6% · Operating margin change 3.2 points · 95% evidence Capital efficiency 12.8/25 · ROCE 11.1% · Operating margin 15.5% · 76% evidence Valuation 13.1/20 · P/E 29.8× · PEG 1.12 · 65% evidence Relative strength 14.9/20 · Lead over its industry 11.3% · Lead over S&P 500 0.6% · 1 year 15.2% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 22.8 + 12.8 + 13.1 + 14.9 = 63.6 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 5. [Howmet Aerospace Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hwm) HWM · quiet · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 60.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 25.9/35 · Revenue 18.1% · Profit 34% · Operating margin change 3.5 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 21.0/25 · ROCE 22.7% · Operating margin 28.5% · 76% evidence Valuation 9.3/20 · P/E 57.5× · PEG 1.61 · 65% evidence Relative strength 4.7/20 · Lead over its industry -1.9% · Lead over S&P 500 -11.3% · 1 year 8% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 25.9 + 21 + 9.3 + 4.7 = 60.9 · What this means: Earnings are strong; relative strength in its sector is -1.9% and the one-year return is 8%. 6. [General Dynamics Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/gd) GD · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 58% evidence 58.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 16.4/35 · Revenue n/a · Profit n/a · Operating margin change -0.1 points · 45% evidence Capital efficiency 13.9/25 · ROCE 13.7% · Operating margin 10.4% · 76% evidence Valuation 10.9/20 · P/E 22.5× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 17.2/20 · Lead over its industry 11.4% · Lead over S&P 500 0.9% · 1 year 8.1% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 16.4 + 13.9 + 10.9 + 17.2 = 58.4 · What this means: Some evidence is missing, so the score is pulled toward the middle on purpose. 7. [Elbit Systems Ltd.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/eslt) ESLT · quiet · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 57.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 22.4/35 · Revenue 13.7% · Profit 58.2% · Operating margin change 1.6 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 11.5/25 · ROCE 10.7% · Operating margin 9.6% · 76% evidence Valuation 12.1/20 · P/E 55.9× · PEG 1.1 · 65% evidence Relative strength 11.7/20 · Lead over its industry 8.3% · Lead over S&P 500 -2.4% · 1 year 61.5% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 22.4 + 11.5 + 12.1 + 11.7 = 57.7 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 8. [Leonardo DRS, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/drs) DRS · quiet · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 57.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 21.8/35 · Revenue 10.5% · Profit 28.8% · Operating margin change 2.8 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 13.8/25 · ROCE 12.8% · Operating margin 11.2% · 76% evidence Valuation 11.7/20 · P/E 35.4× · PEG 1.33 · 65% evidence Relative strength 10.4/20 · Lead over its industry 0.8% · Lead over S&P 500 -9.2% · 1 year 10% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 21.8 + 13.8 + 11.7 + 10.4 = 57.7 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 9. [Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hii) HII · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 55.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 19.3/35 · Revenue 14% · Profit 25.9% · Operating margin change 0.5 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 8.9/25 · ROCE 8.4% · Operating margin 7.1% · 76% evidence Valuation 16.0/20 · P/E 16.7× · PEG 0.65 · 65% evidence Relative strength 10.9/20 · Lead over its industry -0.1% · Lead over S&P 500 -10.7% · 1 year 2.4% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 19.3 + 8.9 + 16 + 10.9 = 55.1 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 10. [Loar Holdings Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/loar) LOAR · basing · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 53.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 19.7/35 · Revenue 29.9% · Profit 53.3% · Operating margin change 1.2 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 9.4/25 · ROCE 6.6% · Operating margin 26.2% · 76% evidence Valuation 7.6/20 · P/E 111× · PEG 1.96 · 65% evidence Relative strength 16.3/20 · Lead over its industry 7.7% · Lead over S&P 500 -2.6% · 1 year -8.2% · 100% evidence · 2 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 19.7 + 9.4 + 7.6 + 16.3 = 53 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 11. [Hexcel Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hxl) HXL · quiet · Evidence leans up · 85% evidence 52.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
12. [TransDigm Group Incorporated](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/tdg) TDG · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 52.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
13. [Textron Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/txt) TXT · turning · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 58% evidence 51.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
14. [StandardAero, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/saro) SARO · basing · Evidence leans up · 71% evidence 51.5 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
15. [Northrop Grumman Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/noc) NOC · basing · Evidence leans up · 85% evidence 51.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
16. [Embraer S.A.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/embj) EMBJ · leader · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 49.1 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
17. [L3Harris Technologies, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/lhx) LHX · basing · Evidence leans down · 68% evidence 47.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
18. Honeywell Aerospace Inc. HONA · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 51% evidence 47.5 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
19. [GE Aerospace](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ge) GE · basing · Evidence leans down · 85% evidence 47.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
20. [Curtiss-Wright Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cw) CW · basing · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 46.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
21. [FTAI Aviation Ltd.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ftai) FTAI · quiet · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 43.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
22. [CAE Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cae) CAE · turning · Evidence leans down · 71% evidence 43.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
23. [Rocket Lab Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/rklb) RKLB · quiet · Evidence leans down · 64% evidence 41.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
24. [Axon Enterprise, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/axon) AXON · basing · Evidence leans down · 71% evidence 36.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
25. [The Boeing Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ba) BA · quiet · Evidence leans down · 64% evidence 36.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
26. [BWX Technologies, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/bwxt) BWXT · basing · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 35.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
27. [AeroVironment, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/avav) AVAV · quiet · Most evidence points down · 67% evidence 34.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
28. [Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ktos) KTOS · quiet · Most evidence points down · 71% evidence 32.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
29. [Moog Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/mog-b) MOG-B · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 36% evidence 60.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
30. Space Exploration Technologies Corp. SPCX · breaking out · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 38% evidence 43.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read. The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section. Related companies: [Aerospace & Defense](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/aerospace-defense), all 30 compared on one page. ## Which companies are close to Woodward in size? Woodward is the 15th largest of 61 Aerospace & Defense companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 3 November 2026). Just above it: Axon Enterprise, Inc., Rocket Lab Corporation and FTAI Aviation. Just below it: Curtiss-Wright Corporation, Textron Inc. and Embraer S.A. ### Aerospace & Defense companies close in size

1. [Axon Enterprise, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/axon) $33.8 billion
2. [Rocket Lab Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/rklb) $32.6 billion
3. [FTAI Aviation Ltd.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ftai) $20.5 billion
4. Woodward, Inc. $19.6 billion
5. [Curtiss-Wright Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cw) $18.4 billion
6. [Textron Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/txt) $14.9 billion
7. [Embraer S.A.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/embj) $13.4 billion

[All 61 Aerospace & Defense companies, largest first](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/aerospace-defense#all-companies)

### Companies close in size in other industries

1. [Alliant Energy Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/lnt) $18.9 billion · Utilities - Regulated Electric
2. [Charter Communications, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/chtr) $18.9 billion · Telecom Services
3. Woodward, Inc. $18.9 billion
4. [Snap-on Incorporated](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/sna) $18.8 billion · Tools & Accessories
5. [CDW Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cdw) $18.8 billion · Information Technology Services

## What else do people ask about Woodward? ### What were Woodward's latest quarterly results? Woodward, Inc. reported revenue of $1.1 B and net profit of $147 M for the Jun 2026 quarter. Revenue rose 21.2% and profit rose 35.2% compared with a year earlier. Earnings per share were $2.40. The operating margin was 17.8%, 4.7 percentage points higher than a year earlier (as of 3 November 2026). ### What is Woodward's market cap? Woodward, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $19.6 B at a stock price of $332.69. Market cap is the share price times the number of shares, so it changes whenever the price moves (as of 3 November 2026). ### How is Woodward performing? Woodward, Inc.'s share price has been moving sideways for 12 weeks. In its latest quarter, revenue rose 21.2% and profit rose 35.2% compared with a year earlier. Over the past 13 weeks it has done worse than the S&P 500, for 12 weeks running (as of 3 November 2026). ### Will Woodward's stock price go up? This page does not forecast Woodward, Inc.'s stock price. What it shows instead: the stock price is $332.69, and it has been moving sideways for 12 weeks. Its P/E of 37.0× is higher than 58% of its own last 5 years (as of 3 November 2026). ### Where is Woodward in its business cycle? Woodward, Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 13.9%, against a 5-year range of 8.7% to 13.9%: the top of its range, a record year. When profit is at a record, every ratio looks better than usual, and the story depends on margins staying high. The latest quarter was 17.8%. Comparing margins with a company's own long history is a good way to see where it is in its cycle (as of 3 November 2026). ### What could break the Woodward story? Biggest thing to watch: margins are the best this company has ever reported. Every ratio looks better at a record, so the story depends on margins staying high. On price, this page treats a rise as over when the share price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row (as of 3 November 2026). ### Is Woodward a stock worth studying right now? What the numbers show: Woodward, Inc. is reporting record margins. The main open question: the next one or two quarters of results. Every number on this page is worked out by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions (as of 3 November 2026). This is research, not advice. We’re not SEBI-registered.