# Utz Brands share price today (Utz Brands, Inc., UTZ)

> Utz Brands, Inc.'s share price has risen faster than its earnings: +35.7% in a year, against −95.1% for earnings per share. UTZ · Consumer Staples · Packaged Foods · data as of 3 November 2026. Page: https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/utz

Sector Alpha also publishes a daily newsletter that explains one Indian stock at a time: https://newsletter.sectoralpha.in/?utm_source=sectoralpha&utm_medium=ai_text&utm_campaign=llms

## Key numbers

- Price: $14.29 (+35.7% in a year)
- P/E: 2,017.1× (higher than 100% of the last 4.3 years)
- Revenue (Jun 2026): $372 M (+1.4% on a year ago)
- Profit (Jun 2026): −$10.1 M (−196.2% on a year ago)
- Operating margin: 2.2% (−2.5 points on a year ago)
- ROE: 0%, FY25
- ROIC: 0.1%, against a 6.6% cost of capital: −6.5 points
- Profit that came in as cash: 716%, last 3 years

The main question: the share price moved +35.7% in a year while yearly earnings per share moved −95.1%. The difference came from the market paying a higher multiple. ## What is the Utz Brands share price today? Utz Brands, Inc.'s share price was $14.29 at the close on 3 November 2026. It has been stalling near its high for 16 weeks. That is 37.1% above its average price over the last 200 trading days. In the last 52 weeks it traded between $7 and $14, and at that close it was at the high of that range. Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the S&P 500, and it has stayed ahead for 1 week in a row. Over the last 7.9 years the share price moved +48% while the S&P 500 moved +174%, so it is behind the index over that whole period. The chart above shows the 13-week comparison for every week. This page treats a rise as over when the price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row. ## What dividend does Utz Brands pay? Utz Brands, Inc. paid $0.40 per share over the last four reported quarters. The most recent declaration was $0.06 for Jun 2026. At today's price of $14.29 that is a yield of 2.80%, based on dividends already paid, not a forecast. ## Which stock lists is Utz Brands on? Utz Brands is not in the Nasdaq 100, the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones 30, and is not on the US tech stocks list. ## Is Utz Brands profitable? Utz Brands, Inc. posted a net loss of $10.1 M in the Jun 2026 quarter. Full-year FY25 profit was $800 K. Over 3 years profit has grown −66.1% a year on average. That loss is 2.7% of the quarter's revenue. The same quarter a year earlier earned $10.5 M. 7 of the last 12 reported quarters were loss-making. Jun 2026 profit was −$10.1 M, −196.2% on a year earlier. For the full year, FY25 profit was $800 K (−95.0% on the year before). Why profit moved: revenue changed +1.4% on a year earlier and the margin moved −2.5 percentage points. Sales did the work while the margin got thinner. On average over the last four quarters, profit changed −175.9% and revenue +2.0%. Profit is growing slower than sales: rising costs are taking part of the growth. ## How much revenue does Utz Brands make, and is it growing? Utz Brands, Inc. reported $372 M of revenue in the Jun 2026 quarter, +1.4% on the same quarter a year earlier. That is the 6th quarter in a row with growth on the year before. Over 3 years it has grown 6.8% a year on average. The last full year, FY25, came in at $1.4 B. The last four reported quarters add to $1.5 B. FY25 revenue was $1.4 B, +2.1% on the year before. Recent pace: the last four quarters grew +2.0% on average, against 6.8% a year over the longer run, so this year is growing slower than its own long-run rate. Is growth speeding up? Revenue over the last 12 months grew +2.0%, against +0.9% a year over the last 8 quarters (stabilising). ## How much of every $100 of sales does Utz Brands keep? Utz Brands, Inc.'s operating margin was 2.2% in the Jun 2026 quarter, 2.5 percentage points lower than the same quarter a year ago. Across 5 years it has been between 0.3% and 4.2%. The latest quarter is within that range. Why the margin moved: operating margin changed −2.5 percentage points on the year while gross margin changed +0.7 points. So the drop came mostly from costs below the gross margin, such as staff and overheads, measured against sales. ## Is Utz Brands' profit turning into cash? Over the last 3 years, 716% of Utz Brands, Inc.'s reported profit came in as cash from its operations, so the profit is backed by cash. In FY25 it brought in $112 M of operating cash against $800 K of profit. After $103 M of spending on assets, $9.4 M was left over as free cash. Cash-flow figures here are yearly, because quarterly cash statements are not published, so this section changes once a year. Why: the cash figure is clear, but the day counts behind it are not in our data, so we show it without guessing the reason. What to look at next: the main use of cash is spending on assets. The next section checks what that spending is building. ## Where does Utz Brands' cash go? Utz Brands, Inc. does not report the customer, stock and supplier day counts a cash cycle needs, so this section looks at its spending on assets instead. It spent $257 M on assets over the last 3 years. Averaged over those years that is 6.0% of FY25 revenue a year. Nothing is estimated in place of the missing day counts, so no cash-cycle chart is drawn. Spending on assets: $257 M over the last 3 years. In short: the cash is going into new capacity, not getting stuck in the daily cycle. The question is whether the new capacity earns. ## What is Utz Brands' P/E ratio, and how does it compare with its own history? Utz Brands, Inc.'s P/E is 2,017.1×, about the highest it has ever been. Its usual P/E (the middle reading) is 116.7×, over 4.3 years of weekly prices. This compares the share price with the company’s own past. It does not say what the business is worth. Why the multiple is where it is: over the past year earnings per share moved −95.1% while the price moved +35.7%. The price did better than earnings, which pushed the multiple up within its own range. Where the price move came from: over 3 years the price moved +4.9% a year; about −11.2% a year came from earnings growth and about +16.1 percentage points from the multiple (the market paying more). The split is approximate (price return minus earnings growth). It shows how much of the move came from the market paying a different multiple. In short: the multiple is high against its own past, so the earnings trend underneath matters more than the multiple. ## Is the Utz Brands business getting better or worse? Utz Brands, Inc.'s business trend cannot be read yet. There are fewer than eight usable quarters of growth figures, so there is not enough history to read the trend. This is based on 12 quarters of 2 measures, with some gaps. Why it matters: with too little history, we say so rather than guess a direction. There are fewer than eight usable quarters, so this page does not guess a direction from so little history. ## How much does Utz Brands earn on its capital? Utz Brands, Inc. earned a ROE of 0% in FY25. That is up from a low of −2% in FY23. Its return on capital used (ROIC) is 6.5 percentage points below its cost of capital, so growth here does not yet pay for the capital it uses. It comes from a 0.1% net margin and 0.52× asset turnover (sales divided by assets). Why the return is what it is (FY25): a 0.1% net margin × 0.52× asset turnover × 2.08× leverage (assets divided by equity) ≈ 0.1% on equity. The margin does its share; borrowing is a big part of it. The key test, return on capital used minus the cost of capital: 0.1% − 6.6% = −6.5 percentage points. The 6.6% is an estimate of this company's own cost of capital. Read the sign and size of the gap, not the decimals. Negative: growth at these returns loses value until returns improve. ## Does Utz Brands have too much debt? Utz Brands, Inc. has total debt of $1.0 B against shareholder equity of $1.3 B as of Jun 2026, so its debt is 0.79× its equity. Year by year, that ratio went from 0.64 in FY22 to 0.77 in FY25. Keep that borrowing in mind when reading the returns on this page. ## What is the Utz Brands shareholding pattern? 6.3% of Utz Brands, Inc.'s tradable shares are in short positions, which are bets that the price will fall, so some traders are betting against it. At normal trading volumes, closing those positions would take about 2.7 days. US companies do not publish a quarter-by-quarter list of owners, so this page uses short interest instead. It is a single reading at one point in time; we do not have its history. Why it is at this level: the figure does not say who holds the short positions or why, so we show the level without guessing the story. ## How far is Utz Brands from balance-sheet trouble? For Utz Brands, Inc., the Z-score is 0.73. A Z-score above about 3 is safe and below about 1.8 signals danger, so this is in the danger zone. It estimates how far the balance sheet is from trouble; it is not a forecast of failure. Why it matters: a Z-score of 0.73 is inside the danger zone, so the balance sheet is a real risk. ## How does Utz Brands rank in its industry? 37.6 out of 100, rank 27 of 30 in Packaged Foods, with 71% of the evidence available. Utz Brands, Inc. scores 37.6 out of 100 against the 30 companies it is compared with in Packaged Foods, ranking 27. Relative strength against the index is 32%, and revenue and profit growth are weak. The four parts add up to the total exactly: 8.8 + 3.9 + 8.6 + 16.3 = 37.6. This is the same number shown on the industry page; it is worked out once for the whole group and read here. What would change it: The score would fall if profit growth turns negative or margins stop improving while the share price lags its sector. ## Which companies is Utz Brands compared with? Utz Brands ranks 27 of 30 Packaged Foods companies on the 4-Factor Sector Score, with 37.6 out of 100. 1. [Seneca Foods Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/senea) SENEA · quiet · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 64.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 25.1/35 · Revenue 12.5% · Profit 100% · Operating margin change -1.2 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 14.2/25 · ROCE 15.2% · Operating margin 7.2% · 76% evidence Valuation 15.6/20 · P/E 9.5× · PEG 0.26 · 65% evidence Relative strength 9.5/20 · Lead over its industry 3.3% · Lead over S&P 500 -1.8% · 1 year 42.9% · 100% evidence · 5 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 25.1 + 14.2 + 15.6 + 9.5 = 64.4 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 2. [The J. M. Smucker Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/sjm) SJM · breaking out · Evidence leans up · 67% evidence 62.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 23.1/35 · Revenue 5.1% · Profit n/a · Operating margin change 14.7 points · 71% evidence Capital efficiency 13.6/25 · ROCE 12.2% · Operating margin 17.9% · 76% evidence Valuation 8.7/20 · P/E 55.5× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 17.5/20 · Lead over its industry 17.3% · Lead over S&P 500 10.9% · 1 year 19.5% · 100% evidence · 8 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 23.1 + 13.6 + 8.7 + 17.5 = 62.9 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 3. [Westrock Coffee Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/west) WEST · breaking out · Evidence leans up · 64% evidence 58.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 25.1/35 · Revenue 38.5% · Profit n/a · Operating margin change 5.1 points · 62% evidence Capital efficiency 3.4/25 · ROCE -0.2% · Operating margin 0.6% · 76% evidence Valuation 11.3/20 · P/E -16.3× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 18.4/20 · Lead over its industry 46.1% · Lead over S&P 500 40.6% · 1 year 144.7% · 100% evidence · 6 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 25.1 + 3.4 + 11.3 + 18.4 = 58.2 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 4. [Central Garden & Pet Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cent) CENT · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 57.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 18.1/35 · Revenue -1.2% · Profit 19.4% · Operating margin change -0.2 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 9.9/25 · ROCE 8.2% · Operating margin 14.3% · 76% evidence Valuation 13.1/20 · P/E 15.2× · PEG 0.68 · 65% evidence Relative strength 16.6/20 · Lead over its industry 20.4% · Lead over S&P 500 14.1% · 1 year 47.5% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 18.1 + 9.9 + 13.1 + 16.6 = 57.7 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 5. [Herbalife Ltd.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hlf) HLF · turning · Evidence leans up · 71% evidence 57.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 12.1/35 · Revenue 5.5% · Profit -49.4% · Operating margin change -1.1 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 18.5/25 · ROCE 26.8% · Operating margin 9.8% · 76% evidence Valuation 11.0/20 · P/E 6.3× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 15.7/20 · Lead over its industry 5.1% · Lead over S&P 500 -1.5% · 1 year 58.2% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 12.1 + 18.5 + 11 + 15.7 = 57.3 · What this means: Relative strength against the index is -1.5%, and revenue and profit growth are weak. 6. McCormick & Company, Incorporated MKC-V · basing · Evidence leans up · 85% evidence 53.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 26.3/35 · Revenue 13.2% · Profit 91.7% · Operating margin change 0.7 points · 95% evidence Capital efficiency 15.2/25 · ROCE 10.5% · Operating margin 17.8% · 76% evidence Valuation 6.8/20 · P/E 9.8× · PEG 2.64 · 65% evidence Relative strength 5.0/20 · Lead over its industry -12.9% · Lead over S&P 500 -18.6% · 1 year -25.7% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 26.3 + 15.2 + 6.8 + 5 = 53.3 · What this means: Earnings are strong; relative strength in its sector is -12.9% and the one-year return is -25.7%. 7. [Nomad Foods Limited](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/nomd) NOMD · turning · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 51.8 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 13.7/35 · Revenue -3.5% · Profit -40.8% · Operating margin change 0.1 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 10.4/25 · ROCE 7.3% · Operating margin 13.9% · 76% evidence Valuation 10.5/20 · P/E 10.8× · PEG 1.45 · 65% evidence Relative strength 17.2/20 · Lead over its industry 10.2% · Lead over S&P 500 3.7% · 1 year 1.1% · 100% evidence · 3 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 13.7 + 10.4 + 10.5 + 17.2 = 51.8 · What this means: Relative strength against the index is 3.7%, and revenue and profit growth are weak. 8. [The Marzetti Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/mzti) MZTI · basing · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 51.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 17.0/35 · Revenue 1.1% · Profit 14.4% · Operating margin change 1.5 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 16.8/25 · ROCE 17.3% · Operating margin 10.9% · 76% evidence Valuation 10.9/20 · P/E 16.4× · PEG 1.1 · 65% evidence Relative strength 7.0/20 · Lead over its industry -15.8% · Lead over S&P 500 -21.6% · 1 year -36.3% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 17 + 16.8 + 10.9 + 7 = 51.7 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 9. [Freshpet, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/frpt) FRPT · breaking out · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 51.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 24.3/35 · Revenue 12.8% · Profit 100% · Operating margin change 0.3 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 4.9/25 · ROCE 5.6% · Operating margin 7.1% · 76% evidence Valuation 5.7/20 · P/E 14.3× · PEG 2.68 · 65% evidence Relative strength 16.4/20 · Lead over its industry 11.6% · Lead over S&P 500 4.8% · 1 year 26% · 100% evidence · 10 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 24.3 + 4.9 + 5.7 + 16.4 = 51.3 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 10. [Smithfield Foods, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/sfd) SFD · basing · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 50.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 21.4/35 · Revenue 4.3% · Profit 15.8% · Operating margin change 0.4 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 13.4/25 · ROCE 13.5% · Operating margin 8.4% · 76% evidence Valuation 14.5/20 · P/E 9.3× · PEG 0.67 · 65% evidence Relative strength 1.3/20 · Lead over its industry -21.6% · Lead over S&P 500 -26.1% · 1 year -15.9% · 100% evidence · 0 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 21.4 + 13.4 + 14.5 + 1.3 = 50.6 · What this means: The evidence is balanced: no factor stands out, so another reported quarter is needed before the picture is clearer. 11. [BellRing Brands, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/brbr) BRBR · basing · Evidence leans up · 81% evidence 50.5 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
12. [Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/lw) LW · turning · Evidence leans down · 85% evidence 49.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
13. [Darling Ingredients Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/dar) DAR · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 58% evidence 49.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
14. [Ingredion Incorporated](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ingr) INGR · basing · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 47.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
15. [John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/jbss) JBSS · quiet · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 46.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
16. [General Mills, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/gis) GIS · basing · Evidence leans down · 75% evidence 45.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
17. [The Kraft Heinz Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/khc) KHC · basing · Evidence leans down · 64% evidence 45.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
18. [The Campbell's Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cpb) CPB · basing · Evidence leans down · 85% evidence 43.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
19. [Post Holdings, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/post) POST · turning · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 42.9 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
20. [J&J Snack Foods Corp.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/jjsf) JJSF · quiet · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 41.7 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
21. [Pilgrim's Pride Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ppc) PPC · turning · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 41.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
22. [Hormel Foods Corporation](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hrl) HRL · basing · Evidence leans down · 75% evidence 41.4 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
23. [Conagra Brands, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cag) CAG · basing · Evidence leans down · 75% evidence 40.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
24. [Flowers Foods, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/flo) FLO · basing · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 58% evidence 40.3 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
25. [JBS N.V.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/jbs) JBS · quiet · Evidence leans down · 81% evidence 40.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
26. [The Simply Good Foods Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/smpl) SMPL · turning · Evidence leans down · 71% evidence 39.0 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
27. Utz Brands, Inc. this page UTZ · losing its lead · Evidence leans down · 71% evidence 37.6 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative How the score adds up Growth & earnings 8.8/35 · Revenue 1.9% · Profit -257.9% · Operating margin change -2.5 points · 83% evidence Capital efficiency 3.9/25 · ROCE 0.5% · Operating margin 2.2% · 76% evidence Valuation 8.6/20 · P/E 59.2× · PEG n/a · 15% evidence Relative strength 16.3/20 · Lead over its industry 39.4% · Lead over S&P 500 32% · 1 year 44.2% · 100% evidence · 9 of 12 weeks ahead Exact sum: 8.8 + 3.9 + 8.6 + 16.3 = 37.6 · What this means: Relative strength against the index is 32%, and revenue and profit growth are weak. 28. [Mama's Creations, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/mama) MAMA · quiet · Evidence leans down · 85% evidence 37.2 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
29. [The Magnum Ice Cream Company N.V.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/micc) MICC · turning · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 31% evidence 51.5 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative
30. [Once Upon A Farm, PBC](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/ofrm) OFRM · quiet · Too little evidence to rank firmly · 41% evidence 41.5 out of 100 Growth Capital Valuation Relative

Missing figures are not scored as bad. They lower the confidence and pull the final score toward the middle. Relative strength counts only when the company has a reading for this week; with no reading, that factor is left out and its 20 points are shared across the other three in proportion. PEG is not shown when the ratio cannot mean anything: the company must be making a profit, its price-to-earnings must be positive, and its three-year earnings growth must fall between 5% and 60%. Dividing a price multiple by a loss, or by growth measured off a tiny base, produces a number that looks precise and tells you nothing. Under relative strength, one mark per week shows the last 12 weeks: a mark is filled where the company led S&P 500 by 5% or more over the 13 weeks ending that week, which is the same test used everywhere on this site. Price stage places the company on the same six-step path the industry is placed on (basing, turning, breaking out, leader, fading, asleep), read from how many weeks running it has led S&P 500 and whether that lead is growing or shrinking. It describes where the share price stands, not the direction of earnings, and it is not a recommendation; it is left blank for a company whose weekly history is too short or too stale to read. The figures in this ranking come from the industry comparison: results through the Sep 2026 quarter, and the P/E at that quarter's end. The sections above use the latest weekly price, so a P/E or return there can differ a little from the one here. The stage words in this ranking (such as losing its lead or breaking out) describe the lead over the index, not the price phase in the price section. Related companies: [Packaged Foods](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/packaged-foods), all 30 compared on one page. ## Which companies are close to Utz Brands in size? Utz Brands is the 19th largest of 39 Packaged Foods companies on Sector Alpha by market value (scores of 3 November 2026). Just above it: Freshpet, Inc., The Marzetti Company and Central Garden & Pet Company. Just below it: Nomad Foods, J&J Snack Foods Corp. and Herbalife. ### Packaged Foods companies close in size

1. [Freshpet, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/frpt) $3.3 billion
2. [The Marzetti Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/mzti) $3 billion
3. [Central Garden & Pet Company](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/cent) $2.9 billion
4. Utz Brands, Inc. $2.1 billion
5. [Nomad Foods Limited](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/nomd) $1.7 billion
6. [J&J Snack Foods Corp.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/jjsf) $1.6 billion
7. [Herbalife Ltd.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/hlf) $1.5 billion

[All 39 Packaged Foods companies, largest first](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/sectors/packaged-foods#all-companies)

### Companies close in size in other industries

1. [Globant S.A.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/glob) $2.1 billion · Information Technology Services
2. [SmartStop Self Storage REIT, Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/sma) $2.1 billion · REIT - Industrial
3. Utz Brands, Inc. $2.1 billion
4. [Zymeworks Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/zyme) $2.1 billion · Biotechnology
5. [GigaCloud Technology Inc.](https://www.sectoralpha.in/us/stocks/gct) $2.1 billion · Software - Infrastructure

## What else do people ask about Utz Brands? ### What were Utz Brands's latest quarterly results? Utz Brands, Inc. reported revenue of $372 M and a net loss of $10.1 M for the Jun 2026 quarter. Revenue rose 1.4% and profit fell 196.2% compared with a year earlier. Earnings per share were −$0.11. The operating margin was 2.2%, 2.5 percentage points lower than a year earlier (as of 3 November 2026). ### What is Utz Brands's market cap? Utz Brands, Inc.'s market capitalisation is $2.1 B at a stock price of $14.29. Market cap is the share price times the number of shares, so it changes whenever the price moves (as of 3 November 2026). ### How is Utz Brands performing? Utz Brands, Inc.'s share price has been stalling near its high for 16 weeks. In its latest quarter, revenue rose 1.4% and profit fell 196.2% compared with a year earlier. Over the past 13 weeks it has done better than the S&P 500, for 1 week running (as of 3 November 2026). ### Will Utz Brands's stock price go up? This page does not forecast Utz Brands, Inc.'s stock price. What it shows instead: the stock price is $14.29, and it has been stalling near its high for 16 weeks. Its P/E of 2,017.1× is higher than 100% of its own last 4 years (as of 3 November 2026). ### Where is Utz Brands in its business cycle? Utz Brands, Inc.'s FY25 operating margin was 0.7%, against a 5-year range of 0.3% to 4.2%: the low end of its own range, which is often where recoveries start. The latest quarter was 2.2%. Comparing margins with a company's own long history is a good way to see where it is in its cycle (as of 3 November 2026). ### What could break the Utz Brands story? The main question: the share price moved +35.7% in a year while yearly earnings per share moved −95.1%. The difference came from the market paying a higher multiple. On price, this page treats a rise as over when the share price closes below its 200-day average on two Fridays in a row (as of 3 November 2026). ### Is Utz Brands a stock worth studying right now? What the numbers show: Utz Brands, Inc.'s share price has risen faster than its earnings: +35.7% in a year, against −95.1% for earnings per share. The main open question: whether earnings grow into a price that has already moved. Every number on this page is worked out by code from the published figures, with no forecasts and no price opinions (as of 3 November 2026). This is research, not advice. We’re not SEBI-registered.